Spurious correlation #2,099 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As fewer people held these degrees, there was a noticeable decline in the use of fire extinguishers for non-emergency purposes during weekend BBQs, leading to a reduction in the overall demand for LPG in Japan. Remember, when it comes to fire safety, sometimes it's better to just not play with fire (or gas)!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant Discovery magazine cover featuring a group of students wearing fire control and safety uniforms, proudly displaying their newly awarded associates degrees amidst a scene of celebration. Nearby, a joyful Japanese family gathers around a BBQ grill, using a small cylinder of liquefied petroleum gas to prepare their meal. The cover should exude a sense of accomplishment, community, and cultural diversity, while capturing the essence of education and fire safety practices. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Cyber folk Whimsical illustration Cutsy art illustration A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of students in fire control and safety uniforms proudly hold up their newly awarded associates degrees. Nearby, a Japanese family happily gathers around a BBQ grill, using a small cylinder of liquefied petroleum gas to cook their meal.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: A group of students in fire control and safety uniforms proudly hold up their newly awarded associates degrees. Nearby, a Japanese family happily gathers around a BBQ grill, using a small cylinder of liquefied petroleum gas to cook their meal. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant Discovery magazine cover featuring a group of students wearing fire control and safety uniforms, proudly displaying their newly awarded associates degrees amidst a scene of celebration. Nearby, a joyful Japanese family gathers around a BBQ grill, using a small cylinder of liquefied petroleum gas to prepare their meal. The cover should exude a sense of accomplishment, community, and cultural diversity, while capturing the essence of education and fire safety practices.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

The Journal of Pyrotechnic Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we ignited an investigation into the fascinating intersection of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to probe this fiery relationship. To our astonishment, we uncovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.

Our findings suggest that there is more than just smoke and mirrors at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety may stoke the flames of LPG utilization in Japan. While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection remains a bit hazy, our research kindles a burning curiosity and calls for further investigation. As we fan the flames of understanding, it becomes evident that the fiery world of LPG and the educational realms of fire control are not just playing with fire, but rather dancing in a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As we dive into the fiery realm of academic research, it's easy to get burned by the scorching mysteries that await us. In this study, we set out to explore the blazing connection between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. While the topic may initially seem as complex as a chemical reaction, our investigation aims to shed light on the smoldering relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.
The spark that ignited this investigation stemmed from the perennial question: what fuels the rampant use of LPG in Japan? Is there a proverbial fire under the educational pursuit of fire control and safety that drives this phenomenon? As we delved into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we couldn't help but wonder if we were about to unravel a fiery enigma or stumble upon a statistical red herring.
It is crucial to acknowledge the existing literature on this subject, which has largely overlooked the potential interplay between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the practical application of LPG. Our study seeks to fill this gap in the research landscape, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before.
The findings of this research project, if successful, will not only provide valuable insights into the symbiotic relationship between education and practical use of LPG, but also ignite a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry in the fields of fire safety, education, and energy utilization. So, let us don our academic fire suits and brave the flames of statistical analysis as we harness the power of data to unravel this scorching mystery. After all, what's a little statistical saber-rattling in the pursuit of knowledge and a few good puns along the way?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The sizzling connection between the granting of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan has long been an area of smoldering interest. Smith et al. (2016) delved into the complexities of fire safety education, while Doe and Jones (2019) examined the patterns of LPG usage in various cultural contexts. These serious investigations provide a solid foundation for understanding the burning correlation between academic pursuits in fire control and the practical application of LPG in Japan.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Fire Safety Engineering: Design of Structures" by Smith and "The LPG Industry in Japan" by Doe offer valuable insights into the technical and practical aspects of fire safety education and LPG usage. Meanwhile, in the realm of fiction, "Burning Ambitions" by Jane Flame and "The Inferno Code" by Rick Blazer provide a fiery backdrop for imagining the potential interplay between academic pursuits in fire control and the blazing use of LPG.

In a departure from traditional research sources, we also consulted a myriad of unconventional materials for our literature review. This included exploring the intricate complexities of fire safety and LPG utilization as depicted in the CVS receipts of unsuspecting shoppers. The scintillating details unearthed from these thermal papers shed unexpected light on the connection between fire safety education and LPG usage, igniting a new kind of inquiry into the realm of scholarly investigation.

As we kindle the flames of academic curiosity, it becomes apparent that the connection between associates degrees in fire control and safety and LPG use in Japan is much more than just a flash in the pan. Our literature review has not only unearthed illuminating sources but also sparked a newfound appreciation for the incendiary potential of interdisciplinary research. Stay tuned as we stoke the fires of statistical analysis and dive deeper into the scorching mysteries that await us in the turbulent intersection of fire control education and LPG utilization in Japan.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we ignited an investigation into the fascinating intersection of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to probe this fiery relationship. To our astonishment, we uncovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.

Our findings suggest that there is more than just smoke and mirrors at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety may stoke the flames of LPG utilization in Japan. While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection remains a bit hazy, our research kindles a burning curiosity and calls for further investigation. As we fan the flames of understanding, it becomes evident that the fiery world of LPG and the educational realms of fire control are not just playing with fire, but rather dancing in a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As we dive into the fiery realm of academic research, it's easy to get burned by the scorching mysteries that await us. In this study, we set out to explore the blazing connection between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. While the topic may initially seem as complex as a chemical reaction, our investigation aims to shed light on the smoldering relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.
The spark that ignited this investigation stemmed from the perennial question: what fuels the rampant use of LPG in Japan? Is there a proverbial fire under the educational pursuit of fire control and safety that drives this phenomenon? As we delved into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we couldn't help but wonder if we were about to unravel a fiery enigma or stumble upon a statistical red herring.
It is crucial to acknowledge the existing literature on this subject, which has largely overlooked the potential interplay between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the practical application of LPG. Our study seeks to fill this gap in the research landscape, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before.
The findings of this research project, if successful, will not only provide valuable insights into the symbiotic relationship between education and practical use of LPG, but also ignite a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry in the fields of fire safety, education, and energy utilization. So, let us don our academic fire suits and brave the flames of statistical analysis as we harness the power of data to unravel this scorching mystery. After all, what's a little statistical saber-rattling in the pursuit of knowledge and a few good puns along the way?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To kindle the flames of discovery, our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between associates degrees awarded in fire control and safety and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. With a touch of scientific rigor and a hefty dose of academic zeal, we dived headfirst into the world of data collection and statistical analysis.

Data Collection:
We gathered data spanning the period from 2011 to 2021 from a variety of sources, including the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. We sifted through endless spreadsheets and reports, traversing the digital landscape like intrepid explorers in search of buried statistical treasure. It was a journey filled with more twists and turns than a rollercoaster ride through a statistical theme park, but we emerged triumphant, armed with a wealth of data to fuel our analysis.

Variables:
The first variable of interest was the number of associates degrees awarded in fire control and safety. We carefully tabulated these numbers, ensuring that not a single degree was left unaccounted for. It was a bit like counting the stars in the sky—daunting, yet strangely exhilarating.

The second variable, LPG consumption in Japan, added a fiery dimension to our investigation. We scoured the depths of energy consumption data, feeling like modern-day alchemists on a quest for the elusive philosopher's stone. Our pursuit of LPG consumption figures was nothing short of a statistical treasure hunt, complete with its fair share of dead ends and hidden gems.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our trusty statistical software, we unleashed a barrage of tests and analyses to unravel the intricacies of the relationship between associates degrees in fire control and safety and LPG use in Japan. We performed a scorching correlation analysis, seeking to tease out the sizzling connection between these variables. The correlation coefficient, like a fiery phoenix rising from the ashes of data, emerged as a beacon of insight.

In addition, we employed a searing regression analysis to probe the potential causal relationship between these variables. It was a bit like playing with statistical fire, but oh, the thrill of uncovering patterns and relationships amidst the data chaos.

Limitations:
Like any scientific undertaking, our research was not without its limitations. The nature of secondary data meant that we had to navigate potential discrepancies and inaccuracies in the datasets. However, armed with our proverbial fire extinguishers of statistical scrutiny, we forged ahead, mindful of the potential bumps in the road.

Overall, our methodology sizzled with a blend of meticulous data collection, fiery statistical analyses, and a dash of academic intrigue. As we embraced the sparks of discovery, we ventured forth into the uncharted territory of educational pursuits and practical applications, ready to confront the statistical inferno that lay ahead.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9725708, r-squared of 0.9458939, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we ignited an investigation into the fascinating intersection of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to probe this fiery relationship. To our astonishment, we uncovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.

Our findings suggest that there is more than just smoke and mirrors at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety may stoke the flames of LPG utilization in Japan. While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection remains a bit hazy, our research kindles a burning curiosity and calls for further investigation. As we fan the flames of understanding, it becomes evident that the fiery world of LPG and the educational realms of fire control are not just playing with fire, but rather dancing in a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
As we dive into the fiery realm of academic research, it's easy to get burned by the scorching mysteries that await us. In this study, we set out to explore the blazing connection between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. While the topic may initially seem as complex as a chemical reaction, our investigation aims to shed light on the smoldering relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.
The spark that ignited this investigation stemmed from the perennial question: what fuels the rampant use of LPG in Japan? Is there a proverbial fire under the educational pursuit of fire control and safety that drives this phenomenon? As we delved into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we couldn't help but wonder if we were about to unravel a fiery enigma or stumble upon a statistical red herring.
It is crucial to acknowledge the existing literature on this subject, which has largely overlooked the potential interplay between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the practical application of LPG. Our study seeks to fill this gap in the research landscape, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before.
The findings of this research project, if successful, will not only provide valuable insights into the symbiotic relationship between education and practical use of LPG, but also ignite a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry in the fields of fire safety, education, and energy utilization. So, let us don our academic fire suits and brave the flames of statistical analysis as we harness the power of data to unravel this scorching mystery. After all, what's a little statistical saber-rattling in the pursuit of knowledge and a few good puns along the way?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The scorching pursuit of understanding the connection between associates degrees in fire control and safety and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Japan has yielded some fiery findings. As we pored over the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a blazing correlation coefficient of 0.9725708, an r-squared of 0.9458939, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period between 2011 and 2021.

Our statistical analysis has ignited a profound realization: there is a sizzling correlation between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of LPG in Japan. The relationship between these two variables is not just a flash in the pan; it's a sustained, burning connection that defies the odds—like a phoenix rising from the statistical ashes.

In Figure 1, our scatterplot visually captures the intense heat of this correlation, with data points blazing a trail of undeniable association between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the consumption of LPG. The figure aptly illustrates the fiery dance between these variables, leaving little room for doubt that there's more than just a smoldering connection at play here.

These findings add fuel to the fiery debate surrounding the impact of education on practical applications, and it raises important questions about the role of fire safety knowledge in shaping energy utilization patterns. It seems that while we were busy crunching numbers, the implications of our research were heating up faster than a Bunsen burner in a chemistry lab.

The scintillating implications of this correlation cannot be extinguished easily. It sparks the need for further exploration into the mechanisms behind this unexpected connection, fanning the flames of curiosity and setting ablaze a new avenue of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we stoke the fires of understanding, it becomes clear that this smoldering tango between education and practical applications is not just a statistical anomaly; it's a fiery symbiosis that demands further scrutiny.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the scorching bond between firefighting education and LPG usage in Japan, but it also ignites a fervor for delving deeper into the ways in which knowledge and practicality converge. This sizzling revelation sets the stage for future studies to fan the flames of inquiry and unravel the complexities of this incendiary relationship. After all, where there's smoke, there's fire—and where there's statistical significance, there's bound to be a few puns thrown in for good measure.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we ignited an investigation into the fascinating intersection of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to probe this fiery relationship. To our astonishment, we uncovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.

Our findings suggest that there is more than just smoke and mirrors at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety may stoke the flames of LPG utilization in Japan. While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection remains a bit hazy, our research kindles a burning curiosity and calls for further investigation. As we fan the flames of understanding, it becomes evident that the fiery world of LPG and the educational realms of fire control are not just playing with fire, but rather dancing in a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The sizzling connection between the granting of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan has long been an area of smoldering interest. Smith et al. (2016) delved into the complexities of fire safety education, while Doe and Jones (2019) examined the patterns of LPG usage in various cultural contexts. These serious investigations provide a solid foundation for understanding the burning correlation between academic pursuits in fire control and the practical application of LPG in Japan.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Fire Safety Engineering: Design of Structures" by Smith and "The LPG Industry in Japan" by Doe offer valuable insights into the technical and practical aspects of fire safety education and LPG usage. Meanwhile, in the realm of fiction, "Burning Ambitions" by Jane Flame and "The Inferno Code" by Rick Blazer provide a fiery backdrop for imagining the potential interplay between academic pursuits in fire control and the blazing use of LPG.
In a departure from traditional research sources, we also consulted a myriad of unconventional materials for our literature review. This included exploring the intricate complexities of fire safety and LPG utilization as depicted in the CVS receipts of unsuspecting shoppers. The scintillating details unearthed from these thermal papers shed unexpected light on the connection between fire safety education and LPG usage, igniting a new kind of inquiry into the realm of scholarly investigation.
As we kindle the flames of academic curiosity, it becomes apparent that the connection between associates degrees in fire control and safety and LPG use in Japan is much more than just a flash in the pan. Our literature review has not only unearthed illuminating sources but also sparked a newfound appreciation for the incendiary potential of interdisciplinary research. Stay tuned as we stoke the fires of statistical analysis and dive deeper into the scorching mysteries that await us in the turbulent intersection of fire control education and LPG utilization in Japan.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching pursuit of understanding the connection between associates degrees in fire control and safety and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Japan has yielded some fiery findings. As we pored over the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a blazing correlation coefficient of 0.9725708, an r-squared of 0.9458939, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period between 2011 and 2021.
Our statistical analysis has ignited a profound realization: there is a sizzling correlation between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of LPG in Japan. The relationship between these two variables is not just a flash in the pan; it's a sustained, burning connection that defies the odds—like a phoenix rising from the statistical ashes.
In Figure 1, our scatterplot visually captures the intense heat of this correlation, with data points blazing a trail of undeniable association between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the consumption of LPG. The figure aptly illustrates the fiery dance between these variables, leaving little room for doubt that there's more than just a smoldering connection at play here.
These findings add fuel to the fiery debate surrounding the impact of education on practical applications, and it raises important questions about the role of fire safety knowledge in shaping energy utilization patterns. It seems that while we were busy crunching numbers, the implications of our research were heating up faster than a Bunsen burner in a chemistry lab.
The scintillating implications of this correlation cannot be extinguished easily. It sparks the need for further exploration into the mechanisms behind this unexpected connection, fanning the flames of curiosity and setting ablaze a new avenue of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we stoke the fires of understanding, it becomes clear that this smoldering tango between education and practical applications is not just a statistical anomaly; it's a fiery symbiosis that demands further scrutiny.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the scorching bond between firefighting education and LPG usage in Japan, but it also ignites a fervor for delving deeper into the ways in which knowledge and practicality converge. This sizzling revelation sets the stage for future studies to fan the flames of inquiry and unravel the complexities of this incendiary relationship. After all, where there's smoke, there's fire—and where there's statistical significance, there's bound to be a few puns thrown in for good measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our scintillating findings support the existing research that has long simmered with the idea of a spicy connection between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the sizzling utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Japan. The statistical inferno we have uncovered sets the stage for a blaze of passionate discussions, akin to a group of scientists huddled around a bonfire, pondering the perplexing mysteries of academia and practicality.

Taking a cue from Smith et al. (2016) and Doe and Jones (2019), who fervently examined the complexities of fire safety education and patterns of LPG usage, our research kindles a fresh perspective on the undeniable correlation between academic pursuits in fire control and the blazing use of LPG. As we stoke the flames of understanding, it becomes clear that the heated bond we've identified is not just a flash in the pan; it's a sustained, inferno-like relationship that defies statistical odds.

Our findings are not merely a statistical anomaly; they are a testament to the combustion of knowledge and real-world applications. The implications of this fiery correlation cannot be extinguished easily; they evoke a burning desire for further exploration into the mechanisms behind this unexpected connection. In a sense, our research ignites a fervor for delving deeper into the ways in which knowledge and practicality converge, much like a well-contained backdraft event in the realm of academia.

Figure 1 visually captures the intense heat of this correlation, with data points blazing a trail of undeniable association between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the consumption of LPG. Our statistical bonfire leaves little room for doubt that there's more than just a smoldering connection at play here.

While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection may remain a bit hazy, our research has ignited a new kind of inquiry into the realm of scholarly investigation. Our scorching revelation sets the stage for future studies to fan the flames of inquiry and unravel the complexities of this incendiary relationship. After all, where there's smoke, there's fire—and where there's statistical significance, there's bound to be a few puns thrown in for good measure.

We urge fellow researchers to approach this fiery topic with the same fervor and enthusiasm, bringing not only statistical rigor but also a spark of creativity and perhaps even a hint of pyromania. In doing so, we may illuminate new pathways for interdisciplinary exploration and bring an added element of heat to the scholarly discourse.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we ignited an investigation into the fascinating intersection of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to probe this fiery relationship. To our astonishment, we uncovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.

Our findings suggest that there is more than just smoke and mirrors at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety may stoke the flames of LPG utilization in Japan. While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection remains a bit hazy, our research kindles a burning curiosity and calls for further investigation. As we fan the flames of understanding, it becomes evident that the fiery world of LPG and the educational realms of fire control are not just playing with fire, but rather dancing in a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
As we dive into the fiery realm of academic research, it's easy to get burned by the scorching mysteries that await us. In this study, we set out to explore the blazing connection between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. While the topic may initially seem as complex as a chemical reaction, our investigation aims to shed light on the smoldering relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.
The spark that ignited this investigation stemmed from the perennial question: what fuels the rampant use of LPG in Japan? Is there a proverbial fire under the educational pursuit of fire control and safety that drives this phenomenon? As we delved into the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we couldn't help but wonder if we were about to unravel a fiery enigma or stumble upon a statistical red herring.
It is crucial to acknowledge the existing literature on this subject, which has largely overlooked the potential interplay between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the practical application of LPG. Our study seeks to fill this gap in the research landscape, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before.
The findings of this research project, if successful, will not only provide valuable insights into the symbiotic relationship between education and practical use of LPG, but also ignite a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry in the fields of fire safety, education, and energy utilization. So, let us don our academic fire suits and brave the flames of statistical analysis as we harness the power of data to unravel this scorching mystery. After all, what's a little statistical saber-rattling in the pursuit of knowledge and a few good puns along the way?

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching pursuit of understanding the connection between associates degrees in fire control and safety and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Japan has yielded some fiery findings. As we pored over the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a blazing correlation coefficient of 0.9725708, an r-squared of 0.9458939, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period between 2011 and 2021.
Our statistical analysis has ignited a profound realization: there is a sizzling correlation between the awarding of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of LPG in Japan. The relationship between these two variables is not just a flash in the pan; it's a sustained, burning connection that defies the odds—like a phoenix rising from the statistical ashes.
In Figure 1, our scatterplot visually captures the intense heat of this correlation, with data points blazing a trail of undeniable association between educational pursuits in fire control and safety and the consumption of LPG. The figure aptly illustrates the fiery dance between these variables, leaving little room for doubt that there's more than just a smoldering connection at play here.
These findings add fuel to the fiery debate surrounding the impact of education on practical applications, and it raises important questions about the role of fire safety knowledge in shaping energy utilization patterns. It seems that while we were busy crunching numbers, the implications of our research were heating up faster than a Bunsen burner in a chemistry lab.
The scintillating implications of this correlation cannot be extinguished easily. It sparks the need for further exploration into the mechanisms behind this unexpected connection, fanning the flames of curiosity and setting ablaze a new avenue of interdisciplinary inquiry. As we stoke the fires of understanding, it becomes clear that this smoldering tango between education and practical applications is not just a statistical anomaly; it's a fiery symbiosis that demands further scrutiny.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the scorching bond between firefighting education and LPG usage in Japan, but it also ignites a fervor for delving deeper into the ways in which knowledge and practicality converge. This sizzling revelation sets the stage for future studies to fan the flames of inquiry and unravel the complexities of this incendiary relationship. After all, where there's smoke, there's fire—and where there's statistical significance, there's bound to be a few puns thrown in for good measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the scorching conclusion of our red-hot research endeavor, we have unearthed a blazing correlation between the conferral of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Japan. Our statistical analysis has not only fanned the flames of understanding but has also sparked a fervent call for further investigation into this fiery nexus.

The heat is on, as the correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 leave little doubt that there's more than just a smoldering connection at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety might be adding fuel to the fire of LPG utilization in Japan, creating a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements that demand attention.

As we extinguish any lingering doubts about the fiery nature of this relationship, let it be known that our research not only lights a fire under the debate surrounding education's impact on practical applications but also sparks an ardent curiosity for delving deeper into the ways in which knowledge and practice converge. After all, where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's statistical significance, there's bound to be a few puns thrown in for good measure.

In the spirit of all things smoldering and statistically significant, it is clear that no further research is needed in this area (at least not until the next statistical brushfire threatens to ignite our curiosity). As the flames of inquiry die down, we bid adieu to this scorching adventure, confident that our findings will remain as evergreen as a perpetually burning bonfire on the statistical landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pyrotechnic Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Fire Safety and Combustion Research

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan with an abstract of In this study, we ignited an investigation into the fascinating intersection of associates degrees in fire control and safety and the use of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Japan. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to probe this fiery relationship. To our astonishment, we uncovered a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9725708 and a sizzling p-value of < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Our findings suggest that there is more than just smoke and mirrors at play here. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge in fire control and safety may stoke the flames of LPG utilization in Japan. While the exact mechanism behind this scorching connection remains a bit hazy, our research kindles a burning curiosity and calls for further investigation. As we fan the flames of understanding, it becomes evident that the fiery world of LPG and the educational realms of fire control are not just playing with fire, but rather dancing in a sizzling tango of academic and practical elements.

ChatGPT:

associates degrees, fire control and safety, LPG utilization, Japan, correlation coefficient, p-value, National Center for Education Statistics, Energy Information Administration

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Fire control and safety
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Japan in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan

Correlation r = 0.9725708 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9458939 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.3E-7.^Show 0.0000005275108149146871000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 5.3E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,895,696 random variables^Note You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety (Degrees awarded)	4603	4779	4910	4649	4525	4241	4191	4284	4305	4031	3985
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan (Million Barrels/Day)	491.195	529.284	518.214	498.912	449.625	430.016	418.375	433.679	428.049	391.467	395.244

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4603,4779,4910,4649,4525,4241,4191,4284,4305,4031,3985,])
array_2 = np.array([491.195,529.284,518.214,498.912,449.625,430.016,418.375,433.679,428.049,391.467,395.244,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Associates degrees awarded in Fire control and safety
Line chart for only Liquefied petroleum gas used in Japan
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Fanning the Flames: The Blazing Connection Between Associates Degrees in Fire Control and Safety and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Use in Japan

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!

Correlation ID: 2099 · Black Variable ID: 1238 · Red Variable ID: 24578


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: