about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,189 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and the second variable is Google searches for 'please clap'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's simple really - as air pollution levels rose in Bozeman, so did the levels of carbon dioxide. This led to an increase in the growth of the Please Clap trees, which are known for their unique ability to thrive in CO2-rich environments. As these trees flourished, they released a pollen that, when inhaled, inexplicably triggered an uncontrollable urge to Google 'Please Clap.' It's almost like the city inadvertently became a hotbed for botanical meme propagation. Who would have thought that a problem like air pollution could branch out into such unexpected and ap-pollen-ing outcomes?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a photo-realistic image depicting Bozeman, Montana's skyline partially obscured by a hazy layer of smog. Within the city, people are visible holding their phones and looking up "please clap" with puzzled expressions on their faces. The scene is set during a sunny day with subtle tones of blue and green highlighting the smog-covered skyline. The people are dressed casually, adding to the sense of everyday life. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A photo-realistic image Celtic art a Polaroid photo Cubism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Bozeman, Montana, the skyline is partially obscured by a hazy layer of smog, while people in the city can be seen looking up "please clap" on their phones, with puzzled expressions on their faces.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Bozeman, Montana, the skyline is partially obscured by a hazy layer of smog, while people in the city can be seen looking up "please clap" on their phones, with puzzled expressions on their faces. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a photo-realistic image depicting Bozeman, Montana's skyline partially obscured by a hazy layer of smog. Within the city, people are visible holding their phones and looking up "please clap" with puzzled expressions on their faces. The scene is set during a sunny day with subtle tones of blue and green highlighting the smog-covered skyline. The people are dressed casually, adding to the sense of everyday life.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana positively influenced please clap (Google searches for 'please clap'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

The Journal of Sustainable Sprout Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

It is often said that the winds of change blow through the most unexpected avenues. Our investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap' has certainly uncovered a gust of surprising findings. This study takes a comedic twist as we explore the intersection of environmental science and internet culture. It brings to mind the punny question: "Why did the air pollution go to therapy? It had too many issues to 'clear' up on its own!"

The debate surrounding the impact of air pollution on human behavior has long been a topic of serious concern, but our research aims to inject a bit of levity into the conversation. We've delved into the data, not with a magnifying glass, but with a 'pollution-seeing' scope, and the results have taken us on an unexpected journey through digital landscapes. It's as if the relationship between air quality and search queries is whispering, "What do you call a depressed air molecule? An 'atmo-sad' molecule!"

Through the meticulous analysis of Environmental Protection Agency records and Google Trends data, we have uncovered a noteworthy correlation that suggests a potential link between the level of air pollution in Bozeman and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'please clap'. It's almost as if the air pollution is delivering a message through these searches, saying, "I'm not just a gas – I deserve applause too!"

Our findings have shown a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period of 2004 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between air pollution and the inclination to seek approval online. It's as if the air pollution and the residents engaging in these searches are engaged in a comedic conversation, with the former saying, "I may be invisible, but my impact surely isn't!" One could almost picture the air pollution sitting at a computer, typing the words 'please clap' and adding, "I hope this isn’t just a breath of fresh 'heir'!"

This newfound correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected ways in which the physical environment may influence digital behavior. It's as if the air pollution has taken on the role of a digital provocateur, promoting engagement through its invisible yet impactful presence. This whimsical aspect of our findings urges us to consider the ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere, as if the air pollution wanted to say, "I may not have a voice, but I certainly have a 'pollu-tude'!"

As we delve into the details of this unexpected correlation, we hope to shed light on the wry humor of this association and invite further investigation into the curious ways in which our online actions may be influenced by the environment around us. The findings are sure to leave you 'clap'-tivated and ready to applaud the unexpected relationships that emerge when we explore the unexpected connections in our everyday lives. After all, who knew air pollution could be such a digital influencer?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is often said that the winds of change blow through the most unexpected avenues. Our investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap' has certainly uncovered a gust of surprising findings. This study takes a comedic twist as we explore the intersection of environmental science and internet culture. It brings to mind the punny question: "Why did the air pollution go to therapy? It had too many issues to 'clear' up on its own!"
The debate surrounding the impact of air pollution on human behavior has long been a topic of serious concern, but our research aims to inject a bit of levity into the conversation. We've delved into the data, not with a magnifying glass, but with a 'pollution-seeing' scope, and the results have taken us on an unexpected journey through digital landscapes. It's as if the relationship between air quality and search queries is whispering, "What do you call a depressed air molecule? An 'atmo-sad' molecule!"
Through the meticulous analysis of Environmental Protection Agency records and Google Trends data, we have uncovered a noteworthy correlation that suggests a potential link between the level of air pollution in Bozeman and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'please clap'. It's almost as if the air pollution is delivering a message through these searches, saying, "I'm not just a gas – I deserve applause too!"
Our findings have shown a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period of 2004 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between air pollution and the inclination to seek approval online. It's as if the air pollution and the residents engaging in these searches are engaged in a comedic conversation, with the former saying, "I may be invisible, but my impact surely isn't!" One could almost picture the air pollution sitting at a computer, typing the words 'please clap' and adding, "I hope this isn’t just a breath of fresh 'heir'!"
This newfound correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected ways in which the physical environment may influence digital behavior. It's as if the air pollution has taken on the role of a digital provocateur, promoting engagement through its invisible yet impactful presence. This whimsical aspect of our findings urges us to consider the ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere, as if the air pollution wanted to say, "I may not have a voice, but I certainly have a 'pollu-tude'!"
As we delve into the details of this unexpected correlation, we hope to shed light on the wry humor of this association and invite further investigation into the curious ways in which our online actions may be influenced by the environment around us. The findings are sure to leave you 'clap'-tivated and ready to applaud the unexpected relationships that emerge when we explore the unexpected connections in our everyday lives. After all, who knew air pollution could be such a digital influencer?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we embark upon this peculiar yet captivating journey into the realm of air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and its whimsical connection to Google searches for 'please clap', it is pertinent to first review the existing literature on the subject of environmental influence on human behavior. Smith et al. (2018) examined the impact of air quality on cognitive function, while Doe and Jones (2020) studied the psychological effects of living in areas with high levels of pollution.

In "Fresh Air: The Purity Paradox," the authors explore the intricate relationship between clean air and mental well-being, which, strangely enough, leads us to ponder whether the residents of Bozeman are hoping for a round of applause as they endure less-than-fresh air.

The work of fiction novel "Choked Up: An Atmospheric Mystery" takes a different spin on the theme, weaving a tale of intrigue set in a town much like Bozeman, where the air quality mysteriously influences the inhabitants' desire for external validation.

Furthermore, the cartoon series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" portrays the adventures of environmental superheroes, underscoring the significance of air quality and environmental consciousness. As we contemplate the incongruous connection between air pollution and 'please clap' searches, one can't help but wonder if Captain Planet himself would applaud this unexpected revelation.

Meanwhile, the educational children's show "The Magic School Bus" takes its young audience on field trips through the wonders of science, surely encouraging them to ponder the enigmatic relationship between air quality and online queries for affirmation.

In "The Air Up There: A Layperson's Guide to Understanding Atmosphere," these real-world and fictional sources collectively shed light on the surprising potential for environmental factors to influence digital behavior, leaving us with the intriguing question: Is air pollution the unsung influencer behind the digital call for approval? This unexpected twist in our exploration may lead us to a conclusion that really takes the 'clap'!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is often said that the winds of change blow through the most unexpected avenues. Our investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap' has certainly uncovered a gust of surprising findings. This study takes a comedic twist as we explore the intersection of environmental science and internet culture. It brings to mind the punny question: "Why did the air pollution go to therapy? It had too many issues to 'clear' up on its own!"
The debate surrounding the impact of air pollution on human behavior has long been a topic of serious concern, but our research aims to inject a bit of levity into the conversation. We've delved into the data, not with a magnifying glass, but with a 'pollution-seeing' scope, and the results have taken us on an unexpected journey through digital landscapes. It's as if the relationship between air quality and search queries is whispering, "What do you call a depressed air molecule? An 'atmo-sad' molecule!"
Through the meticulous analysis of Environmental Protection Agency records and Google Trends data, we have uncovered a noteworthy correlation that suggests a potential link between the level of air pollution in Bozeman and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'please clap'. It's almost as if the air pollution is delivering a message through these searches, saying, "I'm not just a gas – I deserve applause too!"
Our findings have shown a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period of 2004 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between air pollution and the inclination to seek approval online. It's as if the air pollution and the residents engaging in these searches are engaged in a comedic conversation, with the former saying, "I may be invisible, but my impact surely isn't!" One could almost picture the air pollution sitting at a computer, typing the words 'please clap' and adding, "I hope this isn’t just a breath of fresh 'heir'!"
This newfound correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected ways in which the physical environment may influence digital behavior. It's as if the air pollution has taken on the role of a digital provocateur, promoting engagement through its invisible yet impactful presence. This whimsical aspect of our findings urges us to consider the ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere, as if the air pollution wanted to say, "I may not have a voice, but I certainly have a 'pollu-tude'!"
As we delve into the details of this unexpected correlation, we hope to shed light on the wry humor of this association and invite further investigation into the curious ways in which our online actions may be influenced by the environment around us. The findings are sure to leave you 'clap'-tivated and ready to applaud the unexpected relationships that emerge when we explore the unexpected connections in our everyday lives. After all, who knew air pollution could be such a digital influencer?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the comical yet captivating connection between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap', our research employed a blend of traditional methods and whimsical approaches. First, we scraped air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, diving deep into the digital 'pollution' of information for the most 'air-resistible' findings. Utilizing Google Trends, we then tapped into the virtual realm, where the spirit of digital applause truly takes flight like a feather-light particulate matter. One might say we were on a quest to find the 'air'-resistible link between atmospheric conditions and internet behavior; after all, everyone loves a good 'atmo-sphere' joke!

The data collection process involved comparing the levels of various air pollutants in Bozeman, including ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide, to the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'please clap'. It's almost as if we set out to uncover the melodious 'air'-monies between the physical and virtual realms, to the tune of a digital 'applause' symphony.

Next, we performed a detailed statistical analysis, not to rain on anyone's parade but to 'cloud' the judgment of skeptics even further. We calculated correlation coefficients and p-values, hoping to substantiate the 'air'-refutable link between air pollution and the online quest for virtual applause. We were determined to ensure that our findings were not just a gust of hot air, but a hearty 'applause'-worthy discovery that could not be 'air'-gued with!

In addition to these serious statistical approaches, we also took a lighthearted stance, probing the data with a virtual magnifying glass and a good dose of digital humor. We delved into the peculiarities of internet culture with the same enthusiasm as uncovering hidden puns, digging for the hidden jokes as if they were buried treasure. After all, in the realm of research, when the going gets tough, the tough get 'punny'!

To truly encapsulate the essence of our methodology, one might say we combined the seriousness of environmental research with the extravaganza of an online comedy show, all in the pursuit of uncovering the unexpected correlations that may lie 'clap' between the lines. And for the record, that which lies between the lines is, undoubtedly, air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7776197, r-squared of 0.6046925, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It is often said that the winds of change blow through the most unexpected avenues. Our investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap' has certainly uncovered a gust of surprising findings. This study takes a comedic twist as we explore the intersection of environmental science and internet culture. It brings to mind the punny question: "Why did the air pollution go to therapy? It had too many issues to 'clear' up on its own!"
The debate surrounding the impact of air pollution on human behavior has long been a topic of serious concern, but our research aims to inject a bit of levity into the conversation. We've delved into the data, not with a magnifying glass, but with a 'pollution-seeing' scope, and the results have taken us on an unexpected journey through digital landscapes. It's as if the relationship between air quality and search queries is whispering, "What do you call a depressed air molecule? An 'atmo-sad' molecule!"
Through the meticulous analysis of Environmental Protection Agency records and Google Trends data, we have uncovered a noteworthy correlation that suggests a potential link between the level of air pollution in Bozeman and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'please clap'. It's almost as if the air pollution is delivering a message through these searches, saying, "I'm not just a gas – I deserve applause too!"
Our findings have shown a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period of 2004 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between air pollution and the inclination to seek approval online. It's as if the air pollution and the residents engaging in these searches are engaged in a comedic conversation, with the former saying, "I may be invisible, but my impact surely isn't!" One could almost picture the air pollution sitting at a computer, typing the words 'please clap' and adding, "I hope this isn’t just a breath of fresh 'heir'!"
This newfound correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected ways in which the physical environment may influence digital behavior. It's as if the air pollution has taken on the role of a digital provocateur, promoting engagement through its invisible yet impactful presence. This whimsical aspect of our findings urges us to consider the ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere, as if the air pollution wanted to say, "I may not have a voice, but I certainly have a 'pollu-tude'!"
As we delve into the details of this unexpected correlation, we hope to shed light on the wry humor of this association and invite further investigation into the curious ways in which our online actions may be influenced by the environment around us. The findings are sure to leave you 'clap'-tivated and ready to applaud the unexpected relationships that emerge when we explore the unexpected connections in our everyday lives. After all, who knew air pollution could be such a digital influencer?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our research revealed a striking correlation between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "please clap". The correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and an r-squared value of 0.6046925 indicate a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. It's almost like the air pollution was pulling the strings behind the internet searches, prompting one to exclaim, "Who knew that air pollution could play the role of a digital puppeteer? It's really 'air' we go!"

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually represents this remarkable relationship, unmistakably demonstrating the upward trajectory of 'please clap' searches as air pollution levels increase. It's as though the air pollution was making its presence 'air'-ly felt in the digital realm, demanding some recognition through these increasingly frequent Google queries.

The significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2021 solidifies the robustness of the association observed. It's as if the air pollution was 'polluting' the digital space with its invisible influence, leaving a 'trace' that couldn't go unnoticed. This unexpected correlation serves as a gentle reminder of the idiosyncrasies that underlie human behavior, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance between environmental factors and our virtual interactions.

Overall, our findings pave the way for a lighthearted examination of the ways in which environmental conditions may quietly shape our online expressions. It's almost as if the air pollution was saying, "I may not have a sound, but I surely have a 'pollu-tude' influence on your Google searches!" The surprising connection between air quality and the online quest for approval invites further exploration into the unexpected avenues through which environmental factors interlace with our digital lives. It's almost as if the air pollution was asking for a round of applause for its digital debut!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we embark upon this peculiar yet captivating journey into the realm of air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and its whimsical connection to Google searches for 'please clap', it is pertinent to first review the existing literature on the subject of environmental influence on human behavior. Smith et al. (2018) examined the impact of air quality on cognitive function, while Doe and Jones (2020) studied the psychological effects of living in areas with high levels of pollution.
In "Fresh Air: The Purity Paradox," the authors explore the intricate relationship between clean air and mental well-being, which, strangely enough, leads us to ponder whether the residents of Bozeman are hoping for a round of applause as they endure less-than-fresh air.
The work of fiction novel "Choked Up: An Atmospheric Mystery" takes a different spin on the theme, weaving a tale of intrigue set in a town much like Bozeman, where the air quality mysteriously influences the inhabitants' desire for external validation.
Furthermore, the cartoon series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" portrays the adventures of environmental superheroes, underscoring the significance of air quality and environmental consciousness. As we contemplate the incongruous connection between air pollution and 'please clap' searches, one can't help but wonder if Captain Planet himself would applaud this unexpected revelation.
Meanwhile, the educational children's show "The Magic School Bus" takes its young audience on field trips through the wonders of science, surely encouraging them to ponder the enigmatic relationship between air quality and online queries for affirmation.
In "The Air Up There: A Layperson's Guide to Understanding Atmosphere," these real-world and fictional sources collectively shed light on the surprising potential for environmental factors to influence digital behavior, leaving us with the intriguing question: Is air pollution the unsung influencer behind the digital call for approval? This unexpected twist in our exploration may lead us to a conclusion that really takes the 'clap'!


[[RESULTS]]
Our research revealed a striking correlation between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "please clap". The correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and an r-squared value of 0.6046925 indicate a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. It's almost like the air pollution was pulling the strings behind the internet searches, prompting one to exclaim, "Who knew that air pollution could play the role of a digital puppeteer? It's really 'air' we go!"
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually represents this remarkable relationship, unmistakably demonstrating the upward trajectory of 'please clap' searches as air pollution levels increase. It's as though the air pollution was making its presence 'air'-ly felt in the digital realm, demanding some recognition through these increasingly frequent Google queries.
The significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2021 solidifies the robustness of the association observed. It's as if the air pollution was 'polluting' the digital space with its invisible influence, leaving a 'trace' that couldn't go unnoticed. This unexpected correlation serves as a gentle reminder of the idiosyncrasies that underlie human behavior, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance between environmental factors and our virtual interactions.
Overall, our findings pave the way for a lighthearted examination of the ways in which environmental conditions may quietly shape our online expressions. It's almost as if the air pollution was saying, "I may not have a sound, but I surely have a 'pollu-tude' influence on your Google searches!" The surprising connection between air quality and the online quest for approval invites further exploration into the unexpected avenues through which environmental factors interlace with our digital lives. It's almost as if the air pollution was asking for a round of applause for its digital debut!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The whimsical yet profound link between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap' has left us pleasantly surprised. Our findings not only supported the existing literature but also added a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental influence on digital behavior. From the works of Smith et al. (2018) to even the peculiar insights from "The Magic School Bus," our research has underscored the unexpected potential for a correlation between air quality and online queries for affirmation. It seems that air pollution really had us all 'pollu-tute' this curious connection in plain sight!

The robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value in our study affirm the 'pollu-tude' power of air pollution to influence digital behavior. It's as if the air pollution was saying, "I may not be visible, but my impact is certainly 'air'-eal!" Our results provide a poignant reminder that the influence of environmental factors extends beyond the physical realm and gently nudges us to consider the dance between our atmosphere and our online expressions. It's almost as if the air pollution was giving us a virtual standing ovation for unveiling its hidden influence!

The scatterplot depicting the upward trajectory of 'please clap' searches as air pollution levels increase truly captures the 'air'-estruck nature of this correlation. It's almost as if the air pollution was crafting a digital symphony, conducting the increase in Google searches like a maestro prompting an applause.

Taking a lighthearted yet insightful perspective, our research presents a compelling case for further exploration into the unexpected ways in which environmental conditions may delicately shape our online interactions. It's almost as if the air pollution was saying, "I may not blow my own trumpet, but I surely orchestrated this 'air'ily remarkable correlation!" Our findings not only contribute a touch of humor to the discourse but also beckon us to ponder the enthralling influence of our environment on our digital escapades. It's almost as if the air pollution was calling for a digital encore to its debut on the virtual stage!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana and Google searches for 'please clap'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route

[[ABSTRACT]]
The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.

Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.

This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It is often said that the winds of change blow through the most unexpected avenues. Our investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for 'please clap' has certainly uncovered a gust of surprising findings. This study takes a comedic twist as we explore the intersection of environmental science and internet culture. It brings to mind the punny question: "Why did the air pollution go to therapy? It had too many issues to 'clear' up on its own!"
The debate surrounding the impact of air pollution on human behavior has long been a topic of serious concern, but our research aims to inject a bit of levity into the conversation. We've delved into the data, not with a magnifying glass, but with a 'pollution-seeing' scope, and the results have taken us on an unexpected journey through digital landscapes. It's as if the relationship between air quality and search queries is whispering, "What do you call a depressed air molecule? An 'atmo-sad' molecule!"
Through the meticulous analysis of Environmental Protection Agency records and Google Trends data, we have uncovered a noteworthy correlation that suggests a potential link between the level of air pollution in Bozeman and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'please clap'. It's almost as if the air pollution is delivering a message through these searches, saying, "I'm not just a gas – I deserve applause too!"
Our findings have shown a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period of 2004 to 2021, indicating a robust connection between air pollution and the inclination to seek approval online. It's as if the air pollution and the residents engaging in these searches are engaged in a comedic conversation, with the former saying, "I may be invisible, but my impact surely isn't!" One could almost picture the air pollution sitting at a computer, typing the words 'please clap' and adding, "I hope this isn’t just a breath of fresh 'heir'!"
This newfound correlation serves as a testament to the unexpected ways in which the physical environment may influence digital behavior. It's as if the air pollution has taken on the role of a digital provocateur, promoting engagement through its invisible yet impactful presence. This whimsical aspect of our findings urges us to consider the ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere, as if the air pollution wanted to say, "I may not have a voice, but I certainly have a 'pollu-tude'!"
As we delve into the details of this unexpected correlation, we hope to shed light on the wry humor of this association and invite further investigation into the curious ways in which our online actions may be influenced by the environment around us. The findings are sure to leave you 'clap'-tivated and ready to applaud the unexpected relationships that emerge when we explore the unexpected connections in our everyday lives. After all, who knew air pollution could be such a digital influencer?

[[RESULTS]]
Our research revealed a striking correlation between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "please clap". The correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and an r-squared value of 0.6046925 indicate a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. It's almost like the air pollution was pulling the strings behind the internet searches, prompting one to exclaim, "Who knew that air pollution could play the role of a digital puppeteer? It's really 'air' we go!"
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually represents this remarkable relationship, unmistakably demonstrating the upward trajectory of 'please clap' searches as air pollution levels increase. It's as though the air pollution was making its presence 'air'-ly felt in the digital realm, demanding some recognition through these increasingly frequent Google queries.
The significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2021 solidifies the robustness of the association observed. It's as if the air pollution was 'polluting' the digital space with its invisible influence, leaving a 'trace' that couldn't go unnoticed. This unexpected correlation serves as a gentle reminder of the idiosyncrasies that underlie human behavior, beckoning us to consider the whimsical dance between environmental factors and our virtual interactions.
Overall, our findings pave the way for a lighthearted examination of the ways in which environmental conditions may quietly shape our online expressions. It's almost as if the air pollution was saying, "I may not have a sound, but I surely have a 'pollu-tude' influence on your Google searches!" The surprising connection between air quality and the online quest for approval invites further exploration into the unexpected avenues through which environmental factors interlace with our digital lives. It's almost as if the air pollution was asking for a round of applause for its digital debut!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unearthed an unexpectedly entertaining correlation between air pollution in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". The robust association we've observed is as clear as the smog after a heavy bout of industrial emissions. It seems that the air pollution wasn't content with just clouding the skies; it wanted to make its presence known in the virtual sphere as well. It might just be time to recognize air pollution as the ultimate social media influencer – after all, it has been silently shaping our online engagements all along!

From a statistical perspective, the correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01 speak volumes about the connection we've unraveled. It's almost as if the air pollution was trying to send a message through the digital echoes of 'please clap', saying, "I may be invisible, but my impact surely isn't!" One could even jest that the air pollution's real intention was to 'smog' your internet search results with its 'pollu-tude'!

Our findings not only add a humorous twist to the discourse on environmental impacts but also beckon further investigation into the whimsical intertwining of our physical and digital worlds. It's almost as if the air pollution was asking for a standing ovation for its unexpected debut on the digital stage. But fear not, dear researchers, for we have indeed clapped – and we need not search for more connections between air pollution and peculiar Google queries. It seems the comedic saga of 'please clap' and air pollution has reached its rib-tickling conclusion!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sustainable Sprout Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Botanical Research & Environmental Study


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Studying the Sprout about Air Pollution in Bozeman and the Google 'Please Clap' Route with an abstract of The debate over the effects of air pollution on human behavior has taken an unexpected turn as we explore the relationship between air quality in Bozeman, Montana, and Google searches for the phrase "please clap". This study delves into the humorous yet captivating realm of how environmental factors may influence online search habits. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we reveal a noteworthy correlation between levels of air pollution and the frequency of 'please clap' queries on Google.
Our findings show a correlation coefficient of 0.7776197 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021. This suggests a robust association between air pollution in Bozeman and the online expression of seeking approval. One might say that the air pollution really 'clapped' back at the residents through their internet searches.
This discovery provides a whimsical yet intriguing insight into the potential impact of environmental conditions on digital behavior. As we navigate the intersection of air quality and internet queries, it becomes clear that the link between them is not simply thin air. Our research beckons attention to the wry humor of this correlation and invites further investigation into the curious ways in which the virtual world mirrors the physical atmosphere. One might even say the findings will leave you pleasantly 'clap'-tivated.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Bozeman Montana, Google searches, "please clap", Environmental Protection Agency data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, digital behavior, internet queries, air quality, virtual world, physical atmosphere

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Bozeman, MT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana

Google searches for 'please clap'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'please clap' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'please clap'

Correlation r = 0.7776197 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6046925 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'please clap') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00015. 0.0001455952455808545000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,868 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana (Bad air quality days)0.0027322400.002739730.0054794500000000.002739730.0109290.002739730.0027397300.005464480.00273973
Google searches for 'please clap' (Rel. search volume)20.5833330.5833330.5833331.416670.7272730.8751.1666710.8333331.16667115.36364.083333.333333.083332.751.58333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00273224,0,0.00273973,0.00547945,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00273973,0.010929,0.00273973,0.00273973,0,0.00546448,0.00273973,])
array_2 = np.array([2,0.583333,0.583333,0.583333,1.41667,0.727273,0.875,1.16667,1,0.833333,1.16667,1,15.3636,4.08333,3.33333,3.08333,2.75,1.58333,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Bozeman, Montana"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'please clap'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 2189 · Black Variable ID: 22284 · Red Variable ID: 1376
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0