about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,201 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the second variable is Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2013, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smell of perfectly roasted peanuts and tobacco-infused caramel corn wafting from the stands gave the players an unbeatable energy boost, propelling them to smash hit after hit. Looks like South Dakota's sizzling operators were the real MVPs of the World Series!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of Pop art portraying a small town in South Dakota. In the foreground, depict a group of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators hard at work in a factory, tending to the machinery with precision. In the background, illustrate a packed baseball stadium with the winning team in the World Series celebrating as the scoreboard proudly displays a high number of runs scored, lighting up the night sky with joyous cheers. Use vibrant colors and bold outlines to recreate the scene in a visually striking Pop art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Brutalism Low poly Pop art Photorealism
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in South Dakota, a group of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators are hard at work in a factory, tending to the machinery with precision. Meanwhile, in a packed baseball stadium, the winning team in the World Series celebrates as the scoreboard proudly displays a high number of runs scored, lighting up the night sky with joyous cheers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in South Dakota, a group of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators are hard at work in a factory, tending to the machinery with precision. Meanwhile, in a packed baseball stadium, the winning team in the World Series celebrates as the scoreboard proudly displays a high number of runs scored, lighting up the night sky with joyous cheers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of Pop art portraying a small town in South Dakota. In the foreground, depict a group of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators hard at work in a factory, tending to the machinery with precision. In the background, illustrate a packed baseball stadium with the winning team in the World Series celebrating as the scoreboard proudly displays a high number of runs scored, lighting up the night sky with joyous cheers. Use vibrant colors and bold outlines to recreate the scene in a visually striking Pop art style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota caused Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

The Journal of Quirky Statistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2013.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the delightful dance of data analysis and dad jokes awaits us as we dive into the intriguing world of statistical correlations in the most unexpected places. Have you ever pondered the curious connection between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series? Well, dear reader, prepare to be amused and astounded as we unravel this baffling relationship.

Now, when it comes to statistical correlations, we usually expect to find connections between related factors, like peanut butter and jelly or chips and dip. But what happens when we stumble upon an odd couple like tobacco tenders and baseball runs? It’s like discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly harmonious sandwich – a little unexpected, but a fascinating find indeed!

As we embark on this statistical journey, we aim to shed light on the unlikely association between two seemingly disparate domains. Picture this: a group of individuals expertly tending to tobacco and food roasting machines in the tranquil plains of South Dakota, somehow influencing the pulse-pounding world of baseball championship games. It's the statistical equivalent of a curveball when you were expecting a fastball. You simply can't help but be intrigued, much like when you realize you accidentally wore your slippers to work – unusual, but undeniably captivating!

Through meticulous data collection and thorough analysis, we reveal the enchanting statistical bond between these enigmatic variables. Who would have thought that the number of skilled machine operators and tenders in South Dakota could hold such sway over the runs scored by the victorious World Series team? It’s a statistical revelation that rivals the curiosity of why the bicycle couldn't stand up by itself. It was two-tired!

With a whimsical mix of numbers and narrative, we invite you to join us on this delightful and unexpected journey of statistical exploration. Get ready to be amused, bemused, and perhaps even a little puzzled as we untangle the curious connection between tobacco tenders and triumphant runs in the World Series. After all, where else can you uncover such remarkable revelations while entertaining your scientific curiosity?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance of data analysis and dad jokes awaits us as we dive into the intriguing world of statistical correlations in the most unexpected places. Have you ever pondered the curious connection between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series? Well, dear reader, prepare to be amused and astounded as we unravel this baffling relationship.
Now, when it comes to statistical correlations, we usually expect to find connections between related factors, like peanut butter and jelly or chips and dip. But what happens when we stumble upon an odd couple like tobacco tenders and baseball runs? It’s like discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly harmonious sandwich – a little unexpected, but a fascinating find indeed!
As we embark on this statistical journey, we aim to shed light on the unlikely association between two seemingly disparate domains. Picture this: a group of individuals expertly tending to tobacco and food roasting machines in the tranquil plains of South Dakota, somehow influencing the pulse-pounding world of baseball championship games. It's the statistical equivalent of a curveball when you were expecting a fastball. You simply can't help but be intrigued, much like when you realize you accidentally wore your slippers to work – unusual, but undeniably captivating!
Through meticulous data collection and thorough analysis, we reveal the enchanting statistical bond between these enigmatic variables. Who would have thought that the number of skilled machine operators and tenders in South Dakota could hold such sway over the runs scored by the victorious World Series team? It’s a statistical revelation that rivals the curiosity of why the bicycle couldn't stand up by itself. It was two-tired!
With a whimsical mix of numbers and narrative, we invite you to join us on this delightful and unexpected journey of statistical exploration. Get ready to be amused, bemused, and perhaps even a little puzzled as we untangle the curious connection between tobacco tenders and triumphant runs in the World Series. After all, where else can you uncover such remarkable revelations while entertaining your scientific curiosity?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Statistical Analysis of Unlikely Correlations," Smith et al. delve into the curious realm of statistical connections that defy conventional wisdom. The authors present a compelling argument for the exploration of unexpected relationships, urging researchers to embrace the whimsical nature of statistical analysis. It's like the statistical equivalent of a dad joke - unexpected, but undeniably delightful.

Doe and Jones, in "Unraveling Statistical Mysteries," also contribute to this line of inquiry, emphasizing the importance of approaching statistical correlations with an open mind. The authors highlight the need to embrace the unexpected and explore unconventional pairings, much like adding bananas to a pizza - surprising at first, but who knows, it might just work!

Turning to non-fiction resources, "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner offers a thought-provoking exploration of seemingly unrelated factors influencing various outcomes, paving the way for unconventional statistical investigations. Just like the unexpected correlation we're uncovering, the insights in this book are as surprising as finding out that parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet!

In the fictional realm, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams challenge readers' perceptions of reality and the unexpected interconnections between various elements. It's like the literary equivalent of our research findings - a delightful blend of the bizarre and the bewildering!

More recently, social media posts have also offered intriguing insights into improbable connections, with one user humorously suggesting that the number of tobacco tenders in South Dakota could significantly influence the outcome of the World Series. It's an idea as outlandish as a penguin practicing for a marathon - a tad absurd, yet strangely captivating!

The research landscape is filled with instances where unconventional connections lead to remarkable discoveries, much like the unexpected relationship we are investigating. It's a reminder that statistical exploration can be as surprising as realizing that the police never did catch those two tax evaders. They had a good accountant!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2003 to 2013

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance of data analysis and dad jokes awaits us as we dive into the intriguing world of statistical correlations in the most unexpected places. Have you ever pondered the curious connection between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series? Well, dear reader, prepare to be amused and astounded as we unravel this baffling relationship.
Now, when it comes to statistical correlations, we usually expect to find connections between related factors, like peanut butter and jelly or chips and dip. But what happens when we stumble upon an odd couple like tobacco tenders and baseball runs? It’s like discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly harmonious sandwich – a little unexpected, but a fascinating find indeed!
As we embark on this statistical journey, we aim to shed light on the unlikely association between two seemingly disparate domains. Picture this: a group of individuals expertly tending to tobacco and food roasting machines in the tranquil plains of South Dakota, somehow influencing the pulse-pounding world of baseball championship games. It's the statistical equivalent of a curveball when you were expecting a fastball. You simply can't help but be intrigued, much like when you realize you accidentally wore your slippers to work – unusual, but undeniably captivating!
Through meticulous data collection and thorough analysis, we reveal the enchanting statistical bond between these enigmatic variables. Who would have thought that the number of skilled machine operators and tenders in South Dakota could hold such sway over the runs scored by the victorious World Series team? It’s a statistical revelation that rivals the curiosity of why the bicycle couldn't stand up by itself. It was two-tired!
With a whimsical mix of numbers and narrative, we invite you to join us on this delightful and unexpected journey of statistical exploration. Get ready to be amused, bemused, and perhaps even a little puzzled as we untangle the curious connection between tobacco tenders and triumphant runs in the World Series. After all, where else can you uncover such remarkable revelations while entertaining your scientific curiosity?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the perplexing link between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the victorious team in the World Series, our research team engaged in a spirited quest that involved equal parts statistical analysis and whimsical wonder. It was a bit like embarking on a treasure hunt armed with spreadsheets and a strong sense of humor!

Firstly, we gathered data from various sources, including the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, and perhaps even a few dusty almanacs found in the depths of the internet. We made sure to harvest information from the years 2003 to 2013, capturing a slice of time ripe for uncovering this surprising statistical connection. Our data collection process was like foraging for rare mushrooms in a forest – meticulous, yet filled with unexpected twists and turns.

With our data in hand, we embarked on a rather unconventional approach to analysis, combining sophisticated statistical methods with a sprinkle of light-hearted musings. We employed the age-old art of regression analysis, using the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota as our independent variable and the runs scored by the winning baseball team in the World Series as our dependent variable. It felt a bit like mixing up a formal evening attire with a pair of colorful sneakers – an unconventional combination that somehow worked wonders!

In delving into this statistical adventure, we were certainly not short of surprises. By employing measures such as the correlation coefficient and p-value, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01. The strength of this relationship was astonishing but akin to finding a four-leaf clover – rare, but undeniably fortunate.

As we traversed through the maze of data analysis, we also incorporated an element of thematic overlay, weaving in anecdotes and light-hearted observations to keep the research process both insightful and entertaining. It was akin to sipping a fine red wine while poring over complex statistical equations – an unexpected but delightful combination that elevated the overall experience.

In essence, our methodology was a blend of rigorous statistical analysis, unexpected discoveries, and a touch of good-natured humor. By infusing our research with a lighthearted spirit, we were able to illuminate the hidden, and somewhat comical, bond between tobacco tenders and baseball triumphs. It's like finding a hidden gem in a bag of forgotten snacks – a delightful surprise that leaves a lasting impression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2003 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.9053376, r-squared of 0.8196362, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the delightful dance of data analysis and dad jokes awaits us as we dive into the intriguing world of statistical correlations in the most unexpected places. Have you ever pondered the curious connection between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series? Well, dear reader, prepare to be amused and astounded as we unravel this baffling relationship.
Now, when it comes to statistical correlations, we usually expect to find connections between related factors, like peanut butter and jelly or chips and dip. But what happens when we stumble upon an odd couple like tobacco tenders and baseball runs? It’s like discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly harmonious sandwich – a little unexpected, but a fascinating find indeed!
As we embark on this statistical journey, we aim to shed light on the unlikely association between two seemingly disparate domains. Picture this: a group of individuals expertly tending to tobacco and food roasting machines in the tranquil plains of South Dakota, somehow influencing the pulse-pounding world of baseball championship games. It's the statistical equivalent of a curveball when you were expecting a fastball. You simply can't help but be intrigued, much like when you realize you accidentally wore your slippers to work – unusual, but undeniably captivating!
Through meticulous data collection and thorough analysis, we reveal the enchanting statistical bond between these enigmatic variables. Who would have thought that the number of skilled machine operators and tenders in South Dakota could hold such sway over the runs scored by the victorious World Series team? It’s a statistical revelation that rivals the curiosity of why the bicycle couldn't stand up by itself. It was two-tired!
With a whimsical mix of numbers and narrative, we invite you to join us on this delightful and unexpected journey of statistical exploration. Get ready to be amused, bemused, and perhaps even a little puzzled as we untangle the curious connection between tobacco tenders and triumphant runs in the World Series. After all, where else can you uncover such remarkable revelations while entertaining your scientific curiosity?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis unearthed a significant and eye-catching correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This discovery has puzzled and delighted our research team in equal measure, akin to finding a hidden treasure chest in a sandbox – unexpected but undeniably thrilling!

For the time period spanning from 2003 to 2013, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376, suggesting a robust relationship between these unrelated variables. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8196362 and a p-value of less than 0.01, firmly cements the surprising connection we observed. It's as if these variables were performing a well-choreographed salsa dance, entwining in a manner that defies conventional expectations – truly a statistical marvel!

Figure 1 illustrates the mesmerizing association uncovered in our analysis, displaying a scatterplot that vividly portrays the close relationship between the number of machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning teams in the World Series. It's like witnessing a perfect symphony between two seemingly discordant orchestras – a visual testament to the captivating statistical revelation we've unraveled.

In light of these compelling results, it is evident that the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota holds an unexpectedly influential role in the realm of baseball victories. This unanticipated bond serves as a reminder that statistical surprises can lurk in the most unforeseen corners of our world, much like stumbling upon a golden egg in a basket of tomatoes – a delightful oddity that challenges our preconceived notions.

Our research not only sheds light on this peculiar correlation but also emphasizes the intrinsic value of embracing and investigating unconventional connections in the realm of statistics. It's a reminder that the world of data analysis is as full of unexpected twists as a good dad joke, and sometimes, statistical revelations can be as amusing as they are enlightening. After all, who knew that tobacco tenders could also play ball? It's a statistical home run in more ways than one!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Statistical Analysis of Unlikely Correlations," Smith et al. delve into the curious realm of statistical connections that defy conventional wisdom. The authors present a compelling argument for the exploration of unexpected relationships, urging researchers to embrace the whimsical nature of statistical analysis. It's like the statistical equivalent of a dad joke - unexpected, but undeniably delightful.
Doe and Jones, in "Unraveling Statistical Mysteries," also contribute to this line of inquiry, emphasizing the importance of approaching statistical correlations with an open mind. The authors highlight the need to embrace the unexpected and explore unconventional pairings, much like adding bananas to a pizza - surprising at first, but who knows, it might just work!
Turning to non-fiction resources, "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner offers a thought-provoking exploration of seemingly unrelated factors influencing various outcomes, paving the way for unconventional statistical investigations. Just like the unexpected correlation we're uncovering, the insights in this book are as surprising as finding out that parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet!
In the fictional realm, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams challenge readers' perceptions of reality and the unexpected interconnections between various elements. It's like the literary equivalent of our research findings - a delightful blend of the bizarre and the bewildering!
More recently, social media posts have also offered intriguing insights into improbable connections, with one user humorously suggesting that the number of tobacco tenders in South Dakota could significantly influence the outcome of the World Series. It's an idea as outlandish as a penguin practicing for a marathon - a tad absurd, yet strangely captivating!
The research landscape is filled with instances where unconventional connections lead to remarkable discoveries, much like the unexpected relationship we are investigating. It's a reminder that statistical exploration can be as surprising as realizing that the police never did catch those two tax evaders. They had a good accountant!

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis unearthed a significant and eye-catching correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This discovery has puzzled and delighted our research team in equal measure, akin to finding a hidden treasure chest in a sandbox – unexpected but undeniably thrilling!
For the time period spanning from 2003 to 2013, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376, suggesting a robust relationship between these unrelated variables. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8196362 and a p-value of less than 0.01, firmly cements the surprising connection we observed. It's as if these variables were performing a well-choreographed salsa dance, entwining in a manner that defies conventional expectations – truly a statistical marvel!
Figure 1 illustrates the mesmerizing association uncovered in our analysis, displaying a scatterplot that vividly portrays the close relationship between the number of machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning teams in the World Series. It's like witnessing a perfect symphony between two seemingly discordant orchestras – a visual testament to the captivating statistical revelation we've unraveled.
In light of these compelling results, it is evident that the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota holds an unexpectedly influential role in the realm of baseball victories. This unanticipated bond serves as a reminder that statistical surprises can lurk in the most unforeseen corners of our world, much like stumbling upon a golden egg in a basket of tomatoes – a delightful oddity that challenges our preconceived notions.
Our research not only sheds light on this peculiar correlation but also emphasizes the intrinsic value of embracing and investigating unconventional connections in the realm of statistics. It's a reminder that the world of data analysis is as full of unexpected twists as a good dad joke, and sometimes, statistical revelations can be as amusing as they are enlightening. After all, who knew that tobacco tenders could also play ball? It's a statistical home run in more ways than one!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have unearthed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The statistical evidence we have presented undoubtedly supports the need to embrace the whimsical nature of statistical analysis, as suggested by Smith et al. It's as surprising as finding out that the winning team in the World Series could be influenced by the aroma of tobacco roasting - a truly unexpected and intriguing finding!

Our findings also echo the sentiments of Doe and Jones, who emphasize the importance of approaching statistical correlations with an open mind. The robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables certainly underscores the need to explore unconventional pairings, much like adding unexpected toppings to a pizza – you never know, it might just work! The correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 is a testament to the valuable insights that can be gleaned from investigating unexpected connections in the realm of statistics, proving that statistical exploration can be as surprising as a dad joke.

Furthermore, our research aligns with the principles presented in Levitt and Dubner's "Freakonomics," where the unexpected relationship we have uncovered mirrors the thought-provoking exploration of seemingly unrelated factors influencing various outcomes. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?" - an inquiry as compelling as discovering a secret code hidden in plain sight.

Moreover, the intriguing insights from social media posts, humorously suggesting the influence of the number of tobacco tenders in South Dakota on the outcome of the World Series, have been remarkably validated by our research. This unexpected relationship serves as a reminder that statistical exploration can be as captivating as it is informative, much like the eccentricities of a penguin preparing for a marathon – a delightful oddity that challenges our preconceived notions.

In conclusion, our study not only highlights the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and investigating whimsical connections in our world. It's a statistical home run in more ways than one, and the puns in our results are almost as peculiar as finding out why peanuts don't tell jokes – they always go nuts!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.

The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.

As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"

In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance of data analysis and dad jokes awaits us as we dive into the intriguing world of statistical correlations in the most unexpected places. Have you ever pondered the curious connection between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series? Well, dear reader, prepare to be amused and astounded as we unravel this baffling relationship.
Now, when it comes to statistical correlations, we usually expect to find connections between related factors, like peanut butter and jelly or chips and dip. But what happens when we stumble upon an odd couple like tobacco tenders and baseball runs? It’s like discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly harmonious sandwich – a little unexpected, but a fascinating find indeed!
As we embark on this statistical journey, we aim to shed light on the unlikely association between two seemingly disparate domains. Picture this: a group of individuals expertly tending to tobacco and food roasting machines in the tranquil plains of South Dakota, somehow influencing the pulse-pounding world of baseball championship games. It's the statistical equivalent of a curveball when you were expecting a fastball. You simply can't help but be intrigued, much like when you realize you accidentally wore your slippers to work – unusual, but undeniably captivating!
Through meticulous data collection and thorough analysis, we reveal the enchanting statistical bond between these enigmatic variables. Who would have thought that the number of skilled machine operators and tenders in South Dakota could hold such sway over the runs scored by the victorious World Series team? It’s a statistical revelation that rivals the curiosity of why the bicycle couldn't stand up by itself. It was two-tired!
With a whimsical mix of numbers and narrative, we invite you to join us on this delightful and unexpected journey of statistical exploration. Get ready to be amused, bemused, and perhaps even a little puzzled as we untangle the curious connection between tobacco tenders and triumphant runs in the World Series. After all, where else can you uncover such remarkable revelations while entertaining your scientific curiosity?

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis unearthed a significant and eye-catching correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This discovery has puzzled and delighted our research team in equal measure, akin to finding a hidden treasure chest in a sandbox – unexpected but undeniably thrilling!
For the time period spanning from 2003 to 2013, our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376, suggesting a robust relationship between these unrelated variables. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8196362 and a p-value of less than 0.01, firmly cements the surprising connection we observed. It's as if these variables were performing a well-choreographed salsa dance, entwining in a manner that defies conventional expectations – truly a statistical marvel!
Figure 1 illustrates the mesmerizing association uncovered in our analysis, displaying a scatterplot that vividly portrays the close relationship between the number of machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning teams in the World Series. It's like witnessing a perfect symphony between two seemingly discordant orchestras – a visual testament to the captivating statistical revelation we've unraveled.
In light of these compelling results, it is evident that the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota holds an unexpectedly influential role in the realm of baseball victories. This unanticipated bond serves as a reminder that statistical surprises can lurk in the most unforeseen corners of our world, much like stumbling upon a golden egg in a basket of tomatoes – a delightful oddity that challenges our preconceived notions.
Our research not only sheds light on this peculiar correlation but also emphasizes the intrinsic value of embracing and investigating unconventional connections in the realm of statistics. It's a reminder that the world of data analysis is as full of unexpected twists as a good dad joke, and sometimes, statistical revelations can be as amusing as they are enlightening. After all, who knew that tobacco tenders could also play ball? It's a statistical home run in more ways than one!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unraveled a truly intriguing and statistically robust connection between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This unexpected correlation has sent shockwaves through the academic community, leaving even the most seasoned statisticians scratching their heads in disbelief. It's like discovering that playing Mozart's symphonies makes plants grow better - a little out of left field, but undeniably captivating!

Our findings have highlighted the importance of exploring and acknowledging unconventional statistical relationships, much like finding humor in a math equation – unexpected, but delightful all the same. After all, who would have thought that the secret to World Series glory could be linked to the diligent work of machine operators and tenders in the heart of South Dakota? It's as surprising as realizing that you can't trust atoms because they make up everything!

In light of these revelatory results, we assert that no further research in this area is needed. The statistical bond between tobacco tenders and baseball triumphs stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of the data world. It's a reminder that even in the realm of numbers, there's always room for a good laugh and a surprising discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Statistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Tobacco and Sports Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tobacco Tenders and Runs Scored: A Tantalizing Tale with an abstract of The study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. The research team delves into this unexpected relationship with a mix of statistical analysis and good ol' dad jokes to keep the reader entertained throughout their scientific journey.
The research methodology involved gathering data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this puzzling connection. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9053376 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2013. This statistical evidence helps cement the unexpected relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, surprising enough to make even the most experienced statistician do a double-take.
As the data suggests, the number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota appears to have a quirky but undeniable link to the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. This correlation adds a new dimension to the age-old question of "What factors truly drive success in major sports events?"
In conclusion, the findings of this study not only highlight the unexpected nature of statistical correlations but also emphasize the importance of acknowledging and investigating bizarre connections in our world. Who knew that tobacco tenders and baseball victories shared such a striking bond? It's almost as peculiar as why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

ChatGPT:

tobacco tenders, food roasting machine operators, drying machine operators, baking machine operators, South Dakota labor statistics, World Series winners, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, research methodology, Bureau of Labor Statistics, data analysis, major sports events, statistical correlations, unusual connections in data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota

Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series

Correlation r = 0.9053376 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8196362 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota) over the 11 years from 2003 through 2013.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00013. 0.0001259750955175981600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,938 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013
The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota (Laborers)150150160150170170180170190150170
Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series (Runs scored)1724202229243229381627




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([150,150,160,150,170,170,180,170,190,150,170,])
array_2 = np.array([17,24,20,22,29,24,32,29,38,16,27,])
array_1_name = "The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Dakota"
array_2_name = "Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 2201 · Black Variable ID: 14357 · Red Variable ID: 534
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0