Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the air became cleaner, the baseballs stopped getting that extra smog-induced lift and carry, leading to fewer runs for the losing team in the World Series. It's a classic case of environmental factors affecting the outcome of America's favorite pastime!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a comical scene on a baseball field in Ukiah, California. The losing team in the World Series is positioned on the field, with defeated expressions as they look up at the now clear, blue sky above them. The once hazy cityscape of Ukiah is visible in the background, gradually clearing up as the air pollution dissipates. As the team members dust off the remnants of the city's haze, they exude an air of anxiety and disappointment as they feel the weight of their impending defeat. The contrast of the cleared skies and the team's dejected demeanor adds a touch of humor to the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Whimsical illustration Hyper-realistic Scalar art Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series, in the following situation: The decrease in air pollution led to clearer skies and better visibility, allowing the losing team to see their impending defeat more clearly. This increased their anxiety and decreased their performance on the field. "All that fresh air just made it easier for them to see their dreams go up in smoke.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Ukiah, California, as the air pollution decreased, the once hazy skies cleared up. The losing team in the World Series, feeling the weight of their impending defeat, could now see the clear blue sky above them. Dusting off the haze of the city, they could see the victory slipping away, leading to an increase in anxiety.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In Ukiah, California, as the air pollution decreased, the once hazy skies cleared up. The losing team in the World Series, feeling the weight of their impending defeat, could now see the clear blue sky above them. Dusting off the haze of the city, they could see the victory slipping away, leading to an increase in anxiety. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a comical scene on a baseball field in Ukiah, California. The losing team in the World Series is positioned on the field, with defeated expressions as they look up at the now clear, blue sky above them. The once hazy cityscape of Ukiah is visible in the background, gradually clearing up as the air pollution dissipates. As the team members dust off the remnants of the city's haze, they exude an air of anxiety and disappointment as they feel the weight of their impending defeat. The contrast of the cleared skies and the team's dejected demeanor adds a touch of humor to the scene.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Ukiah, California caused Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series to decrease.
AI academic paper
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series The Journal of Ecological Anomalies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2013.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of sports, the interplay between environmental factors and athletic performance has long been an area of curiosity. While the influence of weather conditions on outdoor sporting events is well-documented, the potential impact of air quality on athletic outcomes has garnered far less attention. With this in mind, we set out to investigate the peculiar and seemingly improbable connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the esteemed World Series. A seemingly odd pairing, but as they say, stranger things have happened – especially in the world of statistical analysis.
As the old adage goes, "Don't hold your breath," but in this case, the air in Ukiah might just hold some surprising implications for the world of sports. The peculiar nuances of this study are enough to make any researcher do a double-take, but as we wade into the depths of this unexpected correlation, the overlap between environmental conditions and baseball performance becomes increasingly intriguing.
While Ukiah, California is known for its picturesque surroundings and fine wines, it is also an area with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The juxtaposition of this idyllic setting with environmental concerns provides a backdrop that could be straight out of a novel – or in this case, a research paper. Nevertheless, our investigation delves into this seemingly left-field topic with a sense of curiosity coupled with a hint of skepticism, much like a batter eyeing an ambiguous pitch.
So, without further ado, we embark on this empirical journey to shed light on the perplexing relationship between air pollution and World Series outcomes. In doing so, we aim not only to dazzle with statistics, but also to explore the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge when blending environmental economics and sports analytics. Don't worry, we'll make sure to keep the air clear amidst this deluge of data – after all, it's all about finding clarity in the midst of statistical chaos.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of sports, the interplay between environmental factors and athletic performance has long been an area of curiosity. While the influence of weather conditions on outdoor sporting events is well-documented, the potential impact of air quality on athletic outcomes has garnered far less attention. With this in mind, we set out to investigate the peculiar and seemingly improbable connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the esteemed World Series. A seemingly odd pairing, but as they say, stranger things have happened – especially in the world of statistical analysis.
As the old adage goes, "Don't hold your breath," but in this case, the air in Ukiah might just hold some surprising implications for the world of sports. The peculiar nuances of this study are enough to make any researcher do a double-take, but as we wade into the depths of this unexpected correlation, the overlap between environmental conditions and baseball performance becomes increasingly intriguing.
While Ukiah, California is known for its picturesque surroundings and fine wines, it is also an area with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The juxtaposition of this idyllic setting with environmental concerns provides a backdrop that could be straight out of a novel – or in this case, a research paper. Nevertheless, our investigation delves into this seemingly left-field topic with a sense of curiosity coupled with a hint of skepticism, much like a batter eyeing an ambiguous pitch.
So, without further ado, we embark on this empirical journey to shed light on the perplexing relationship between air pollution and World Series outcomes. In doing so, we aim not only to dazzle with statistics, but also to explore the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge when blending environmental economics and sports analytics. Don't worry, we'll make sure to keep the air clear amidst this deluge of data – after all, it's all about finding clarity in the midst of statistical chaos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
An investigation into the unlikely intersection of air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series sends us deep into the annals of research, where we first encounter the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones. In "Air Quality and Its Impact on Athletic Performance," Smith et al. examine the potential influence of air pollution on various sports outcomes, shedding light on the broader implications of environmental factors in the realm of athletics. Similarly, Doe's "Environmental Factors and Sporting Events" provides a comprehensive overview of the understudied relationship between air quality and sports performance, laying the groundwork for our exploration. Jones, in "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Air Pollution," delves into the diverse ramifications of air pollution, though not specifically within the context of sporting events. This literature sets the stage for our foray into the quirky connection between air pollution in Ukiah and World Series runs scored by the losing team.
Venturing beyond the confines of formal academic literature, we turn to non-fiction works with relevance to air quality and baseball. "The Big Smoke: Pollution’s Impact on Urban Life" by Johnson and "Fields of Dreams: The Ecology of Baseball Stadiums" by Williams offer insights into the broader environmental context in which sports unfold. Although not directly addressing the relationship between air pollution in Ukiah and World Series outcomes, these publications point to the intricate web of connections between the environment and athletic pursuits.
As we tread further into the underbrush of literature, we encounter fictional works that, on the surface, may seem removed from our empirical inquiry. However, upon closer examination, these narratives offer unexpected parallels to our study. "The Airbender Chronicles" by Lee and "The Catcher in the Smoke-Filled Stadium" by Salinger beckon us to draw metaphorical connections between environmental quality and the world of baseball. Though these books may not be grounded in statistical analysis, their thematic elements serve as curious companions in our exploration.
Additionally, the classic board game "Clue" inadvertently prompts us to ponder the mysterious linkage between air pollution and baseball statistics. The game's premise of solving a crime within a mansion reflects our quest to unravel the seemingly enigmatic relationship between environmental conditions in Ukiah and baseball outcomes. A dose of whimsy amidst our rigorous data analysis, if you will.
With a nod to both empirical rigor and a touch of levity, we embark on a journey through the literature, unearthing unexpected connections and peculiar inspirations along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 2002 to 2013
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of sports, the interplay between environmental factors and athletic performance has long been an area of curiosity. While the influence of weather conditions on outdoor sporting events is well-documented, the potential impact of air quality on athletic outcomes has garnered far less attention. With this in mind, we set out to investigate the peculiar and seemingly improbable connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the esteemed World Series. A seemingly odd pairing, but as they say, stranger things have happened – especially in the world of statistical analysis.
As the old adage goes, "Don't hold your breath," but in this case, the air in Ukiah might just hold some surprising implications for the world of sports. The peculiar nuances of this study are enough to make any researcher do a double-take, but as we wade into the depths of this unexpected correlation, the overlap between environmental conditions and baseball performance becomes increasingly intriguing.
While Ukiah, California is known for its picturesque surroundings and fine wines, it is also an area with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The juxtaposition of this idyllic setting with environmental concerns provides a backdrop that could be straight out of a novel – or in this case, a research paper. Nevertheless, our investigation delves into this seemingly left-field topic with a sense of curiosity coupled with a hint of skepticism, much like a batter eyeing an ambiguous pitch.
So, without further ado, we embark on this empirical journey to shed light on the perplexing relationship between air pollution and World Series outcomes. In doing so, we aim not only to dazzle with statistics, but also to explore the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge when blending environmental economics and sports analytics. Don't worry, we'll make sure to keep the air clear amidst this deluge of data – after all, it's all about finding clarity in the midst of statistical chaos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To investigate the enigmatic connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, we employed a multidimensional approach fusing elements of statistical analysis, environmental economics, and a dash of whimsy. The dataset utilized in this study was obtained from publicly available sources, primarily the Environmental Protection Agency's air quality monitoring data and the venerable font of knowledge, Wikipedia. The period under scrutiny spans from 2002 to 2013, incorporating a spectrum of World Series matchups and air quality fluctuations.
In pursuit of statistical merriment, we first gathered intimate details of air pollution levels in Ukiah from the EPA's Air Quality System database, available to all fellow aficionados of obscure data. The parameters encompassed a bouquet of air pollutants, including ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide – a veritable smorgasbord of atmospheric ingredients that would make any chemist blush. Moreover, we meticulously sourced historical World Series outcomes, compiling a comprehensive record of runs scored by the losing team in each contest, while prudently sidestepping any foul balls in the data (pun intended).
Our analytical escapade commenced with a romantic tango between descriptive statistics and exploratory data analysis, waltzing through the dusky corridors of correlation matrices and scatterplots. To shed light on the potential romance between air pollution and World Series woes, we indulged in the courtship of hypothesis testing, employing a teasing t-test to ascertain the significance of the observed relationship. Our rendezvous with regression analysis, a perennial favorite among statistical flirts, probed the depth of this connection, unveiling the tangled embrace of univariate and multivariate regression models poised to uncover the truth hidden amidst the statistical chaff.
A harmonious blending of formal statistical techniques and a touch of quirk formed the bedrock of our approach, as we sipped from the statistical cocktail of ordinary least squares regression and time series analysis, ensuring that we steered clear of any statistical hangovers. To ensure the robustness of our findings, sensitivity analyses were deftly woven into our methodological tapestry, akin to a masterful chef meticulously adjusting the seasoning of a gourmet dish.
In sum, our journey through this methodological labyrinth marries the solemnity of empirical analysis with the tantalizing allure of an arcane pursuit, marking our foray into the tantalizing world of environmental economics and the high-stakes drama of World Series runs. As we traverse uncharted territory, we remain vigilant for statistical curveballs, ready to intercept them with the poise and aplomb of veritable statistical fielders.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .
For the time period 2002 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.7590365, r-squared of 0.5761364, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of sports, the interplay between environmental factors and athletic performance has long been an area of curiosity. While the influence of weather conditions on outdoor sporting events is well-documented, the potential impact of air quality on athletic outcomes has garnered far less attention. With this in mind, we set out to investigate the peculiar and seemingly improbable connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the esteemed World Series. A seemingly odd pairing, but as they say, stranger things have happened – especially in the world of statistical analysis.
As the old adage goes, "Don't hold your breath," but in this case, the air in Ukiah might just hold some surprising implications for the world of sports. The peculiar nuances of this study are enough to make any researcher do a double-take, but as we wade into the depths of this unexpected correlation, the overlap between environmental conditions and baseball performance becomes increasingly intriguing.
While Ukiah, California is known for its picturesque surroundings and fine wines, it is also an area with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The juxtaposition of this idyllic setting with environmental concerns provides a backdrop that could be straight out of a novel – or in this case, a research paper. Nevertheless, our investigation delves into this seemingly left-field topic with a sense of curiosity coupled with a hint of skepticism, much like a batter eyeing an ambiguous pitch.
So, without further ado, we embark on this empirical journey to shed light on the perplexing relationship between air pollution and World Series outcomes. In doing so, we aim not only to dazzle with statistics, but also to explore the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge when blending environmental economics and sports analytics. Don't worry, we'll make sure to keep the air clear amidst this deluge of data – after all, it's all about finding clarity in the midst of statistical chaos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The empirical investigation into the connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series bore intriguing results. Our analysis unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7590365, indicating a notable relationship between air pollution and the performance of the less fortunate team on the baseball diamond. This substantial correlation suggests that the air quality in Ukiah may indeed play a role in shaping the outcome of such high-stakes athletic competitions.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5761364 implies that approximately 57.6% of the variability in runs scored by the losing team can be explained by the variations in air pollution levels. While statistics can sometimes resemble a curveball, it's evident that the environmental conditions in Ukiah may have a more significant impact on baseball outcomes than previously envisioned.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further substantiates our findings, signaling a statistically significant association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This outcome reinforces the notion that the air quality in Ukiah may not only affect respiratory health but potentially sway the batting prowess of teams stepping up to the plate in the World Series.
Finally, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between air pollution levels in Ukiah and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. This visual representation emphasizes the salient connection between these seemingly disparate variables and serves as a stark reminder that statistical analyses can uncover unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical relationships. Who would have thought that the composition of the air could intertwine with the destiny of baseball teams on such a grand stage?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
An investigation into the unlikely intersection of air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series sends us deep into the annals of research, where we first encounter the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones. In "Air Quality and Its Impact on Athletic Performance," Smith et al. examine the potential influence of air pollution on various sports outcomes, shedding light on the broader implications of environmental factors in the realm of athletics. Similarly, Doe's "Environmental Factors and Sporting Events" provides a comprehensive overview of the understudied relationship between air quality and sports performance, laying the groundwork for our exploration. Jones, in "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Air Pollution," delves into the diverse ramifications of air pollution, though not specifically within the context of sporting events. This literature sets the stage for our foray into the quirky connection between air pollution in Ukiah and World Series runs scored by the losing team.
Venturing beyond the confines of formal academic literature, we turn to non-fiction works with relevance to air quality and baseball. "The Big Smoke: Pollution’s Impact on Urban Life" by Johnson and "Fields of Dreams: The Ecology of Baseball Stadiums" by Williams offer insights into the broader environmental context in which sports unfold. Although not directly addressing the relationship between air pollution in Ukiah and World Series outcomes, these publications point to the intricate web of connections between the environment and athletic pursuits.
As we tread further into the underbrush of literature, we encounter fictional works that, on the surface, may seem removed from our empirical inquiry. However, upon closer examination, these narratives offer unexpected parallels to our study. "The Airbender Chronicles" by Lee and "The Catcher in the Smoke-Filled Stadium" by Salinger beckon us to draw metaphorical connections between environmental quality and the world of baseball. Though these books may not be grounded in statistical analysis, their thematic elements serve as curious companions in our exploration.
Additionally, the classic board game "Clue" inadvertently prompts us to ponder the mysterious linkage between air pollution and baseball statistics. The game's premise of solving a crime within a mansion reflects our quest to unravel the seemingly enigmatic relationship between environmental conditions in Ukiah and baseball outcomes. A dose of whimsy amidst our rigorous data analysis, if you will.
With a nod to both empirical rigor and a touch of levity, we embark on a journey through the literature, unearthing unexpected connections and peculiar inspirations along the way.
[[RESULTS]]
The empirical investigation into the connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series bore intriguing results. Our analysis unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7590365, indicating a notable relationship between air pollution and the performance of the less fortunate team on the baseball diamond. This substantial correlation suggests that the air quality in Ukiah may indeed play a role in shaping the outcome of such high-stakes athletic competitions.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5761364 implies that approximately 57.6% of the variability in runs scored by the losing team can be explained by the variations in air pollution levels. While statistics can sometimes resemble a curveball, it's evident that the environmental conditions in Ukiah may have a more significant impact on baseball outcomes than previously envisioned.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further substantiates our findings, signaling a statistically significant association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This outcome reinforces the notion that the air quality in Ukiah may not only affect respiratory health but potentially sway the batting prowess of teams stepping up to the plate in the World Series.
Finally, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between air pollution levels in Ukiah and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. This visual representation emphasizes the salient connection between these seemingly disparate variables and serves as a stark reminder that statistical analyses can uncover unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical relationships. Who would have thought that the composition of the air could intertwine with the destiny of baseball teams on such a grand stage?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The exploration of the relationship between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series has unveiled a curious and unexpected connection. Our findings resonate with prior research that has hinted at the potential influence of environmental factors on sports outcomes, such as the work by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017). While these studies may not have directly addressed the specific intersection of air quality in Ukiah and baseball performance, they laid the groundwork for our investigation and encouraged us to consider the broader implications of environmental conditions on athletic contests.
The significant correlation coefficient and low p-value in our analysis corroborate the notion that air pollution may indeed play a role in shaping the performance of the losing team in the World Series. The substantial r-squared value further underscores the significance of the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the less fortunate team. These results align with prior literature on the potential impact of environmental factors on sports performance, albeit in the uniquely whimsical context of Ukiah and the World Series.
Moreover, our surprising findings bring to mind the playful parallels drawn from our literature review. The thematic elements of "The Airbender Chronicles" and "The Catcher in the Smoke-Filled Stadium" now seem to echo the statistical associations we have uncovered, casting a shadow of metaphorical intrigue over our empirical inquiry. As we contemplate these unexpected symmetries, it becomes clear that our study has transcended the realm of traditional statistical analysis and ventured into a space where the whimsical and the empirical intricately intertwine.
Looking ahead, our results beckon further exploration into the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and sports outcomes. While our study presents compelling evidence of the relationship between air pollution in Ukiah and runs scored by the losing team, it also prompts us to consider the broader implications for sports analytics and environmental economics. Could the air quality in other regions similarly influence athletic performances on the grand stage? Perhaps there are hidden layers of influence that extend beyond the baseball diamond, waiting to be uncovered by inquisitive minds and sophisticated statistical methods.
In this vein, our study not only sheds light on the unexpected connection between air pollution and the fate of losing baseball teams but also invites a reimagining of the multifaceted relationship between the environment and sports. As we stand at the crossroads of empirical rigor and the playful whimsy that unfolds amidst our statistical analyses, our investigation serves as a testament to the boundless curiosity and unanticipated discoveries that await researchers in the vast terrain of academia.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ukiah, California and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
[[ABSTRACT]]
The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of sports, the interplay between environmental factors and athletic performance has long been an area of curiosity. While the influence of weather conditions on outdoor sporting events is well-documented, the potential impact of air quality on athletic outcomes has garnered far less attention. With this in mind, we set out to investigate the peculiar and seemingly improbable connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the esteemed World Series. A seemingly odd pairing, but as they say, stranger things have happened – especially in the world of statistical analysis.
As the old adage goes, "Don't hold your breath," but in this case, the air in Ukiah might just hold some surprising implications for the world of sports. The peculiar nuances of this study are enough to make any researcher do a double-take, but as we wade into the depths of this unexpected correlation, the overlap between environmental conditions and baseball performance becomes increasingly intriguing.
While Ukiah, California is known for its picturesque surroundings and fine wines, it is also an area with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The juxtaposition of this idyllic setting with environmental concerns provides a backdrop that could be straight out of a novel – or in this case, a research paper. Nevertheless, our investigation delves into this seemingly left-field topic with a sense of curiosity coupled with a hint of skepticism, much like a batter eyeing an ambiguous pitch.
So, without further ado, we embark on this empirical journey to shed light on the perplexing relationship between air pollution and World Series outcomes. In doing so, we aim not only to dazzle with statistics, but also to explore the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge when blending environmental economics and sports analytics. Don't worry, we'll make sure to keep the air clear amidst this deluge of data – after all, it's all about finding clarity in the midst of statistical chaos.
[[RESULTS]]
The empirical investigation into the connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series bore intriguing results. Our analysis unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7590365, indicating a notable relationship between air pollution and the performance of the less fortunate team on the baseball diamond. This substantial correlation suggests that the air quality in Ukiah may indeed play a role in shaping the outcome of such high-stakes athletic competitions.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5761364 implies that approximately 57.6% of the variability in runs scored by the losing team can be explained by the variations in air pollution levels. While statistics can sometimes resemble a curveball, it's evident that the environmental conditions in Ukiah may have a more significant impact on baseball outcomes than previously envisioned.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further substantiates our findings, signaling a statistically significant association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This outcome reinforces the notion that the air quality in Ukiah may not only affect respiratory health but potentially sway the batting prowess of teams stepping up to the plate in the World Series.
Finally, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between air pollution levels in Ukiah and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. This visual representation emphasizes the salient connection between these seemingly disparate variables and serves as a stark reminder that statistical analyses can uncover unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical relationships. Who would have thought that the composition of the air could intertwine with the destiny of baseball teams on such a grand stage?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a surprising and statistically robust association between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the runs scored by the losing team in the revered World Series. The correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01 indicate a compelling link that cannot be brushed aside like an errant fly ball. The unsuspected impact of environmental conditions on such a pinnacle of athletic competition gives rise to a plethora of inquiries and speculations, much like the anticipation before a tense ninth inning.
The elucidation of this correlation pushes the boundaries of our understanding of the multifaceted relationship between environmental factors and athletic performance. As we traverse the terrain of statistical analysis, it becomes clear that the whimsical nature of our findings serves as a humorous curveball thrown by the statistical world. At the same time, it prompts us to consider the unexpected influences that may operate behind the scenes in the realm of sports, illuminating the broader significance of our research like a perfectly executed home run.
In light of these findings, it is evident that the air in Ukiah may hold more than just the scent of vineyards and the promise of clear skies. It seems that atmospheric composition may wield an unforeseen influence on the outcomes of high-stakes baseball showdowns, adding a nuanced layer to the age-old debate of nature versus nurture in sports performance. Our study underscores the value of looking beyond the obvious and venturing into the realms of scholarly inquiry where unexpected correlations lurk like pinch hitters in the dugout.
As we dust off our data sets and stow away our statistical tools, we are resolute in our assertion that no further research is needed in this captivating and, might we say, light-hearted area of inquiry. After all, not every day does one stumble upon a statistical connection as amusing and enchanting as the one we have unveiled. With that, we retire this bat-and-ball version of statistical exploration, confident that we have unearthed an unexpected and charming discovery in the nooks and crannies of environmental economics and sports analytics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Ecological Anomalies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Ecological Enigmas
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series with an abstract of The potential influence of air pollution on sports outcomes is an underexplored area in the field of environmental economics and sports analytics. This study investigates the peculiar connection between air pollution levels in Ukiah, California, and the performance of the losing team in the World Series. Utilizing comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we employed robust statistical methods to examine the relationship between air quality and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series from 2002 to 2013.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7590365 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical association between air pollution and runs scored by the losing team. This unexpected correlation sparks further questions and prompts us to consider the potential impact of environmental factors on the outcome of high-stakes sporting events. As we delve into this intriguing intersection of environmental conditions and baseball performance, it becomes evident that the air in Ukiah may hold deeper implications for the world of sports than previously imagined.
ChatGPT:
Ukiah California, air pollution, environmental economics, sports analytics, World Series, runs scored, losing team, correlation coefficient, statistical association, high-stakes sporting events
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Ukiah, CaliforniaDetailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Ukiah, CA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Ukiah, California
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5761364 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 57.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Ukiah, California) over the 12 years from 2002 through 2013.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0042. 0.0041989670308285880000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.76 in 0.42% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 238 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.33, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
Air pollution in Ukiah, California (Bad air quality days) | 0.273973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series (Runs scored) | 44 | 21 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 10 | 15 | 27 | 12 | 30 | 6 | 14 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.273973,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([44,21,12,14,11,10,15,27,12,30,6,14,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Ukiah, California"
array_2_name = "Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Ukiah, California
- Line chart for only Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: When the Air Clears, the Bats Disappear: Exploring the Relationship between Air Pollution in Ukiah, California, and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series
Cheers to you for rating this correlation!
Correlation ID: 2537 · Black Variable ID: 21369 · Red Variable ID: 535