about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,914 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of cartographers in Arkansas and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Montserrat.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of cartographers in Arkansas decreased, there were fewer accurate maps of the state. This led to confusion about the location of Montserrat, resulting in less jet fuel being routed to the incorrect destination. It turns out, you can't just wing it when it comes to navigating flights!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting an office setting with low poly aesthetics. Show empty desks and a dwindling number of cartographers working on mapping out flight paths in a quiet Arkansas office. Meanwhile, illustrate a plane flying over the lush green hills of Montserrat, taking a longer route due to inefficient flight paths. The longer route causes the plane to consume more jet fuel, leaving less available for use on the island. Capture the serene office atmosphere juxtaposed with the impact of inefficient flight paths on the aerial landscape in a visually compelling low poly style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Woodblock painting Low poly Magic realism Charcoal
ChatGPT: Low poly

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat, in the following situation: Because as the number of cartographers in Arkansas decreases, there are fewer people to map out efficient flight paths. This causes pilots to take longer routes, resulting in increased fuel consumption. With longer routes, more fuel is needed, leading to a decrease in the amount of jet fuel available for use in Montserrat.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet office in Arkansas, the number of cartographers has decreased, leaving empty desks and fewer people working on mapping out flight paths. Meanwhile, a plane flying over the lush green hills of Montserrat is shown taking a longer route due to the inefficient flight paths, causing it to consume more jet fuel, leaving less available for use on the island.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Low poly ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet office in Arkansas, the number of cartographers has decreased, leaving empty desks and fewer people working on mapping out flight paths. Meanwhile, a plane flying over the lush green hills of Montserrat is shown taking a longer route due to the inefficient flight paths, causing it to consume more jet fuel, leaving less available for use on the island. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting an office setting with low poly aesthetics. Show empty desks and a dwindling number of cartographers working on mapping out flight paths in a quiet Arkansas office. Meanwhile, illustrate a plane flying over the lush green hills of Montserrat, taking a longer route due to inefficient flight paths. The longer route causes the plane to consume more jet fuel, leaving less available for use on the island. Capture the serene office atmosphere juxtaposed with the impact of inefficient flight paths on the aerial landscape in a visually compelling low poly style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of cartographers in Arkansas caused Jet fuel used in Montserrat to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

The Cartographic Review of Spatial Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of geographic information and its impact on economic metrics has been a topic of much interest and rigor within the research community. Cartography, the art and science of map-making, has long been intrinsically linked to our understanding of spatial relationships and navigation. On the other hand, the consumption of jet fuel serves as both a literal and figurative propellant for global commerce and the movement of people and goods. Strangely enough, the whims of fate have led our research team to delve into an unexpected confluence of these seemingly unrelated domains – the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel consumption in Montserrat.

At first glance, the very notion that there could be a connection between cartographers in Arkansas and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat might elicit a wry chuckle or a raised eyebrow. However, it is precisely these unanticipated connections that often yield enlightening insights and propel our understanding of complex systems. Our endeavor begins with a spirit of skepticism, but also with a recognition that serendipity often plays a role in the advancement of scientific inquiry.

As we embark on this systematic investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent humor in the potential entanglement of cartography and jet fuel. After all, one might jest that cartographers are responsible for mapping out efficient flight paths for jets, or that the government of Montserrat suddenly developed an insatiable thirst for detailed maps of the Natural State. While these jests may be lighthearted, the statistical analyses stemming from this investigation reveal a correlation deserving of serious consideration. Our aim is not only to elucidate this peculiar relationship but also to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of research, which may unexpectedly reveal connections that defy conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of geographic information and its impact on economic metrics has been a topic of much interest and rigor within the research community. Cartography, the art and science of map-making, has long been intrinsically linked to our understanding of spatial relationships and navigation. On the other hand, the consumption of jet fuel serves as both a literal and figurative propellant for global commerce and the movement of people and goods. Strangely enough, the whims of fate have led our research team to delve into an unexpected confluence of these seemingly unrelated domains – the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel consumption in Montserrat.
At first glance, the very notion that there could be a connection between cartographers in Arkansas and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat might elicit a wry chuckle or a raised eyebrow. However, it is precisely these unanticipated connections that often yield enlightening insights and propel our understanding of complex systems. Our endeavor begins with a spirit of skepticism, but also with a recognition that serendipity often plays a role in the advancement of scientific inquiry.
As we embark on this systematic investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent humor in the potential entanglement of cartography and jet fuel. After all, one might jest that cartographers are responsible for mapping out efficient flight paths for jets, or that the government of Montserrat suddenly developed an insatiable thirst for detailed maps of the Natural State. While these jests may be lighthearted, the statistical analyses stemming from this investigation reveal a correlation deserving of serious consideration. Our aim is not only to elucidate this peculiar relationship but also to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of research, which may unexpectedly reveal connections that defy conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Geospatial Trends and Labor Force Dynamics," Smith introduces the concept of cartographic labor as a vital component of geographic information systems and urban planning. Smith's analysis emphasizes the role of cartographers in shaping our understanding of spatial relationships, with particular attention to the geographic distribution of cartographers across various states. Doe, in "Jet Fuel Economics and Its Environmental Impact," explores the complex interplay between jet fuel consumption and economic metrics, focusing on the global demand for jet fuel and its implications for energy markets.

Transitioning to a more novel approach, Jones' work in "The Joy of Maps: An Illustrated Guide to Cartography" presents the art of map-making in an accessible and visually engaging manner, underscoring the essentially human endeavor of translating spatial relationships into two-dimensional representations. "Atlas Obscura: An Explorer's Guide to the World's Hidden Wonders" by Foer and Thuras invites readers to rediscover the world through a collection of remarkable maps and geographical curiosities, providing a whimsical perspective on the potential intersection between cartography and unexpected phenomena.

In the realm of fiction, "Treasure Island" by Robert Louis Stevenson offers a thrilling account of nautical adventures and hidden treasures, evoking the romantic allure of exploration and mapping uncharted territories. Likewise, "Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time" by Dava Sobel delves into the historical quest for accurate navigation, replete with maritime escapades and the quest to chart the open seas.

Moreover, the influence of children's programs and animated series cannot be overlooked, as "Dora the Explorer" and "Map" from "Dora the Explorer" have ingrained in young audiences the value of following maps to uncover hidden treasures and solve spatial puzzles. Similarly, "Paw Patrol" features a team of canine heroes who adeptly navigate through demanding terrains, highlighting the indispensability of spatial awareness and strategic mapping in their rescue missions.

As the literature reveals, the multidimensional aspects of cartography and the pervasiveness of spatial awareness transcend conventional boundaries, inviting a lighthearted investigation into the unexpected correlation between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of geographic information and its impact on economic metrics has been a topic of much interest and rigor within the research community. Cartography, the art and science of map-making, has long been intrinsically linked to our understanding of spatial relationships and navigation. On the other hand, the consumption of jet fuel serves as both a literal and figurative propellant for global commerce and the movement of people and goods. Strangely enough, the whims of fate have led our research team to delve into an unexpected confluence of these seemingly unrelated domains – the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel consumption in Montserrat.
At first glance, the very notion that there could be a connection between cartographers in Arkansas and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat might elicit a wry chuckle or a raised eyebrow. However, it is precisely these unanticipated connections that often yield enlightening insights and propel our understanding of complex systems. Our endeavor begins with a spirit of skepticism, but also with a recognition that serendipity often plays a role in the advancement of scientific inquiry.
As we embark on this systematic investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent humor in the potential entanglement of cartography and jet fuel. After all, one might jest that cartographers are responsible for mapping out efficient flight paths for jets, or that the government of Montserrat suddenly developed an insatiable thirst for detailed maps of the Natural State. While these jests may be lighthearted, the statistical analyses stemming from this investigation reveal a correlation deserving of serious consideration. Our aim is not only to elucidate this peculiar relationship but also to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of research, which may unexpectedly reveal connections that defy conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the perplexing relationship between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat, our research team employed a combination of quantitative analysis and eyebrow-raising speculation. The data utilized in this study was primarily sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, offering a potent blend of labor market statistics and energy consumption figures. The years 2007 to 2021 were chosen as the temporal bounds for this investigation, providing a substantial timeframe for observing any potential trends or patterns.

The first step in our convoluted research process involved extracting data on the number of employed cartographers in Arkansas over the specified time period. These valiant individuals, tasked with the noble pursuit of map-making, were presumed to wield a curious influence over the geographic narrative – a narrative that may extend beyond the confines of The Natural State. Simultaneously, data on the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat, with its enigmatic connotations of travel and commerce, prompted our team to harness the power of statistical scrutiny.

The statistical analysis unfurled through a series of portentous calculations, some of which involved the summoning of regression models and correlation coefficients. Our research team invoked the illustrious Pearson correlation coefficient to ascertain the degree of association between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel consumption in Montserrat, summoning p-values to confirm the veracity of our findings. The significant correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 emerged as a surprise, reminiscent of a magician pulling an improbable rabbit from an elusive hat.

Moreover, a series of supplementary analyses sought to mitigate any lurking confounding variables or spurious correlations within the data. Sensitivity analyses and robustness checks were conducted with a meticulousness befitting the quest to untangle this unlikely twining of cartography and jet fuel. These rigorous measures aimed to fortify the veracity of our results and shield them from the caprices of statistical happenstance.

Despite the apparent levity of our whimsical inquiry, the safeguards enforced within our methodological edifice were designed to insulate our findings from the whims of chance. Indeed, the methods employed in this study straddled the boundary between the serious and the absurd, reflecting the essence of a research endeavor that, against all odds, stumbled upon an unforeseen corridor connecting cartographers and jet fuel consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8301498, r-squared of 0.6891486, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of geographic information and its impact on economic metrics has been a topic of much interest and rigor within the research community. Cartography, the art and science of map-making, has long been intrinsically linked to our understanding of spatial relationships and navigation. On the other hand, the consumption of jet fuel serves as both a literal and figurative propellant for global commerce and the movement of people and goods. Strangely enough, the whims of fate have led our research team to delve into an unexpected confluence of these seemingly unrelated domains – the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel consumption in Montserrat.
At first glance, the very notion that there could be a connection between cartographers in Arkansas and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat might elicit a wry chuckle or a raised eyebrow. However, it is precisely these unanticipated connections that often yield enlightening insights and propel our understanding of complex systems. Our endeavor begins with a spirit of skepticism, but also with a recognition that serendipity often plays a role in the advancement of scientific inquiry.
As we embark on this systematic investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent humor in the potential entanglement of cartography and jet fuel. After all, one might jest that cartographers are responsible for mapping out efficient flight paths for jets, or that the government of Montserrat suddenly developed an insatiable thirst for detailed maps of the Natural State. While these jests may be lighthearted, the statistical analyses stemming from this investigation reveal a correlation deserving of serious consideration. Our aim is not only to elucidate this peculiar relationship but also to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of research, which may unexpectedly reveal connections that defy conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a remarkably strong correlation was observed between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Montserrat. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 indicated a substantial positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6891486 suggested that approximately 69% of the variability in jet fuel consumption in Montserrat could be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas. Such a high r-squared value is rather uncommon in studies of this nature, but it appears that our research has truly taken flight in unexpected ways.

The p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of the correlation, providing compelling evidence that the relationship between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat is not merely a random occurrence. These findings, though initially surprising, speak to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and accentuate the importance of approaching research with an open mind.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the linear relationship between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel used in Montserrat. As denoted in the figure, the data points conform remarkably well to a clear pattern, further reinforcing the strength of the observed correlation.

This unexpected connection between cartographers and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat prompts us to consider the potential implications and underlying mechanisms at play. Further exploration and study of this correlation could shed light on the dynamic interplay between geographic information, economic activities, and possibly even the whims of cosmic comedy. While the nuances of this relationship remain to be fully unraveled, there is no denying the captivating nature of this unforeseen association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Geospatial Trends and Labor Force Dynamics," Smith introduces the concept of cartographic labor as a vital component of geographic information systems and urban planning. Smith's analysis emphasizes the role of cartographers in shaping our understanding of spatial relationships, with particular attention to the geographic distribution of cartographers across various states. Doe, in "Jet Fuel Economics and Its Environmental Impact," explores the complex interplay between jet fuel consumption and economic metrics, focusing on the global demand for jet fuel and its implications for energy markets.
Transitioning to a more novel approach, Jones' work in "The Joy of Maps: An Illustrated Guide to Cartography" presents the art of map-making in an accessible and visually engaging manner, underscoring the essentially human endeavor of translating spatial relationships into two-dimensional representations. "Atlas Obscura: An Explorer's Guide to the World's Hidden Wonders" by Foer and Thuras invites readers to rediscover the world through a collection of remarkable maps and geographical curiosities, providing a whimsical perspective on the potential intersection between cartography and unexpected phenomena.
In the realm of fiction, "Treasure Island" by Robert Louis Stevenson offers a thrilling account of nautical adventures and hidden treasures, evoking the romantic allure of exploration and mapping uncharted territories. Likewise, "Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time" by Dava Sobel delves into the historical quest for accurate navigation, replete with maritime escapades and the quest to chart the open seas.
Moreover, the influence of children's programs and animated series cannot be overlooked, as "Dora the Explorer" and "Map" from "Dora the Explorer" have ingrained in young audiences the value of following maps to uncover hidden treasures and solve spatial puzzles. Similarly, "Paw Patrol" features a team of canine heroes who adeptly navigate through demanding terrains, highlighting the indispensability of spatial awareness and strategic mapping in their rescue missions.
As the literature reveals, the multidimensional aspects of cartography and the pervasiveness of spatial awareness transcend conventional boundaries, inviting a lighthearted investigation into the unexpected correlation between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a remarkably strong correlation was observed between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Montserrat. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 indicated a substantial positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6891486 suggested that approximately 69% of the variability in jet fuel consumption in Montserrat could be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas. Such a high r-squared value is rather uncommon in studies of this nature, but it appears that our research has truly taken flight in unexpected ways.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of the correlation, providing compelling evidence that the relationship between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat is not merely a random occurrence. These findings, though initially surprising, speak to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and accentuate the importance of approaching research with an open mind.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the linear relationship between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel used in Montserrat. As denoted in the figure, the data points conform remarkably well to a clear pattern, further reinforcing the strength of the observed correlation.
This unexpected connection between cartographers and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat prompts us to consider the potential implications and underlying mechanisms at play. Further exploration and study of this correlation could shed light on the dynamic interplay between geographic information, economic activities, and possibly even the whims of cosmic comedy. While the nuances of this relationship remain to be fully unraveled, there is no denying the captivating nature of this unforeseen association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unforeseen confluence of cartographic labor and jet fuel consumption, as revealed in our study, cannot be understated. Our findings align with previous literature that has underscored the multidimensional nature of cartography, encompassing not only its practical applications but also its whimsical and unanticipated intersections. The surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel used in Montserrat not only exceeded our initial expectations but also resonated with the lighthearted exploration of cartography's diverse influences presented in various works, including Jones' "The Joy of Maps" and Foer and Thuras' "Atlas Obscura."

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the credibility of this correlation, contradicting any temptation to dismiss it as a mere chance finding. We cannot help but appreciate the irony that a seemingly trivial variable such as the number of cartographers in a landlocked state would share such a robust relationship with the consumption of jet fuel on a volcanic island. This unexpected revelation exemplifies the unpredictability inherent in research endeavors, and it serves as a reminder of the intricate and often humorous links that permeate the world around us.

The high coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6891486, indicating that approximately 69% of the variability in jet fuel consumption in Montserrat can be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas, defies conventional wisdom and elevates this correlation to the realm of fascinating oddities. It is as if the spirits of adventure and exploration, which have long permeated the field of cartography, have extended their influence to the unlikeliest of domains.

It is essential to acknowledge the limitations of our study, particularly the absence of a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving this correlation. While our data offer compelling evidence of the association, further research is warranted to dissect the intricate web of factors that may contribute to this correlation. The unexpected connection between cartographers and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat prompts speculation about the potentially far-reaching implications of this relationship. Could it be that the act of map-making itself exerts an intangible influence on the global dynamics of energy consumption? The whims of cosmic comedy, it seems, may have a hand in teasing out the obscure connections that underpin our world.

In keeping with the spirit of scholarly inquiry, we are compelled to further explore the exceptional correlation uncovered in this study. In doing so, we may all ultimately gain a deeper appreciation for the unanticipated interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena, and perhaps even a chuckle at the surprising associations that lie beneath the surface of conventional understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Jet fuel used in Montserrat. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of geographic information and its impact on economic metrics has been a topic of much interest and rigor within the research community. Cartography, the art and science of map-making, has long been intrinsically linked to our understanding of spatial relationships and navigation. On the other hand, the consumption of jet fuel serves as both a literal and figurative propellant for global commerce and the movement of people and goods. Strangely enough, the whims of fate have led our research team to delve into an unexpected confluence of these seemingly unrelated domains – the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel consumption in Montserrat.
At first glance, the very notion that there could be a connection between cartographers in Arkansas and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat might elicit a wry chuckle or a raised eyebrow. However, it is precisely these unanticipated connections that often yield enlightening insights and propel our understanding of complex systems. Our endeavor begins with a spirit of skepticism, but also with a recognition that serendipity often plays a role in the advancement of scientific inquiry.
As we embark on this systematic investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent humor in the potential entanglement of cartography and jet fuel. After all, one might jest that cartographers are responsible for mapping out efficient flight paths for jets, or that the government of Montserrat suddenly developed an insatiable thirst for detailed maps of the Natural State. While these jests may be lighthearted, the statistical analyses stemming from this investigation reveal a correlation deserving of serious consideration. Our aim is not only to elucidate this peculiar relationship but also to underscore the interdisciplinary nature of research, which may unexpectedly reveal connections that defy conventional wisdom.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a remarkably strong correlation was observed between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Montserrat. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 indicated a substantial positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6891486 suggested that approximately 69% of the variability in jet fuel consumption in Montserrat could be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas. Such a high r-squared value is rather uncommon in studies of this nature, but it appears that our research has truly taken flight in unexpected ways.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of the correlation, providing compelling evidence that the relationship between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat is not merely a random occurrence. These findings, though initially surprising, speak to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and accentuate the importance of approaching research with an open mind.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the linear relationship between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the jet fuel used in Montserrat. As denoted in the figure, the data points conform remarkably well to a clear pattern, further reinforcing the strength of the observed correlation.
This unexpected connection between cartographers and jet fuel consumption in Montserrat prompts us to consider the potential implications and underlying mechanisms at play. Further exploration and study of this correlation could shed light on the dynamic interplay between geographic information, economic activities, and possibly even the whims of cosmic comedy. While the nuances of this relationship remain to be fully unraveled, there is no denying the captivating nature of this unforeseen association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings from our study have put a spotlight on an unforeseen correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the consumption of jet fuel in Montserrat. Despite the initial incredulity that such a link could exist, our statistical analyses have uncovered a robust association that cannot be easily dismissed. This unexpected bond between the world of map-making and the world of high-flying fuel consumption may well inspire not only further research but also a fair share of eyebrow-raising and head-scratching among the academic community.

As we consider the broader implications of this connection, it becomes evident that the interplay between geographic information and energy consumption is far more intricate than we may have previously surmised. The tantalizing prospect of unraveling the mechanisms behind this correlation beckons researchers to embark on further exploration, not only to enhance our understanding of these two domains but also to potentially stumble upon more unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom.

It is important to note that while the statistical evidence demonstrates a compelling relationship between Arkansas cartographers and Montserrat's jet fuel consumption, it does not provide a causal explanation for this connection. The possibility of confounding variables or spurious correlations cannot be discounted, despite the temptation to embrace a fanciful interpretation of cartographers crafting flight paths or map enthusiasts fueling international travel. Humor aside, the potential for broader implications in geographical, economic, and potentially even slapstick analyses cannot be dismissed.

Nevertheless, the data at hand suggest that no further research is necessary in this area. The unexpected correlation has been established, and the world of academia can now embark on new frontiers of inquiry, leaving this peculiar confluence of cartography and jet fuel to be pondered and bemused by future generations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Cartographic Review of Spatial Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Aerial Cartography and Geographical Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Navigating the Skies and the States: A Cartographic Analysis of the Correlation between Arkansas Cartographers and Jet Fuel Consumption in Montserrat with an abstract of This research paper sought to uncover any potential connection between the quantity of cartographers in Arkansas and the quantity of jet fuel utilized in Montserrat. By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a comprehensive assessment spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301498 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a notable association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The implications of this unexpected relationship are not to be taken lightly, as they may have broader implications for geographic, economic, and potentially even comedic analyses in the future. While further research is necessary to fully comprehend the nuances of this correlation, the initial evidence suggests that the world of cartography and jet fuel consumption may indeed intersect in ways that have previously gone unnoticed.

ChatGPT:

Arkansas cartographers, Montserrat jet fuel consumption, correlation analysis, cartographic analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, geographic correlation, economic correlation, surprising correlation, unusual relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of cartographers in Arkansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cartographers and photogrammetrists in Arkansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of cartographers in Arkansas

Jet fuel used in Montserrat
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Montserrat in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Montserrat

Correlation r = 0.8301498 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6891486 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Montserrat) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of cartographers in Arkansas) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00013. 0.0001278677603580458300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,821 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of cartographers in Arkansas (Laborers)1601201306010090904060607070706060
Jet fuel used in Montserrat (Million Barrels/Day)0.008690410.00650.01151480.00108630.008690410.000650.004345210.0004345210.0043450.0021660.00217260.00217260.00217260.001852460.00197161




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([160,120,130,60,100,90,90,40,60,60,70,70,70,60,60,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00869041,0.0065,0.0115148,0.0010863,0.00869041,0.00065,0.00434521,0.000434521,0.004345,0.002166,0.0021726,0.0021726,0.0021726,0.00185246,0.00197161,])
array_1_name = "The number of cartographers in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Montserrat"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2914 · Black Variable ID: 5111 · Red Variable ID: 24710
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0