about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,919 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of pediatricians in Alaska and the second variable is Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The more pediatricians in Alaska, the more they were able to spread the message about the importance of potty training, leading to a sudden surge in interest in stocking up on toilet paper. It seems the pediatricians had a real 'roll' in this unexpected connection!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a Polaroid-style image of a quaint Alaskan town surrounded by snowy peaks and lush pine forests. In the center of the image, a cozy clinic with a "Pediatric Care" sign is depicted, with a line of worried parents stretching out the door, desperately clutching their children's hands. Nearby, a towering digital screen displays the headline "Where to Buy Toilet Paper," and a flurry of hands typing away on smartphones. The scene conveys the chaos and urgency of seeking medical care and essential supplies in a small, isolated town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Steampunk Cyberpunk A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper', in the following situation: Google searches for where to buy toilet paper have increased as the number of pediatricians in Alaska has decreased. This is because as parents struggle to find pediatric care for their children, they are left feeling like they're in a real "mess." Desperate for assistance, they turn to Google to help them locate the most essential item for handling such messy situations - toilet paper.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the far reaches of Alaska, a cozy little town nestled between snowy peaks and lush pine forests. In one corner, a quaint clinic with a "Pediatric Care" sign has a line of worried parents stretching out the door. Frazzled parents desperately clutching their children's hands, seeking medical care. Nearby, a towering digital screen displays the headline "Where to Buy Toilet Paper," with a flurry of hands typing away on smartphones, seeking essential supplies for their messy predicaments.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In the far reaches of Alaska, a cozy little town nestled between snowy peaks and lush pine forests. In one corner, a quaint clinic with a "Pediatric Care" sign has a line of worried parents stretching out the door. Frazzled parents desperately clutching their children's hands, seeking medical care. Nearby, a towering digital screen displays the headline "Where to Buy Toilet Paper," with a flurry of hands typing away on smartphones, seeking essential supplies for their messy predicaments. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a Polaroid-style image of a quaint Alaskan town surrounded by snowy peaks and lush pine forests. In the center of the image, a cozy clinic with a "Pediatric Care" sign is depicted, with a line of worried parents stretching out the door, desperately clutching their children's hands. Nearby, a towering digital screen displays the headline "Where to Buy Toilet Paper," and a flurry of hands typing away on smartphones. The scene conveys the chaos and urgency of seeking medical care and essential supplies in a small, isolated town.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of pediatricians in Alaska positively influenced where to buy toilet paper (Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

Journal of Northern Pediatric Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and this study is no exception. While the connection between pediatricians and toilet paper may seem as unlikely as a penguin in the desert, our investigation has uncovered a peculiar correlation that cannot be flushed away. In the vast expanse of Alaska, where the wilderness stretches for miles and the wildlife reigns supreme, we found ourselves embarking on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between pediatric care and the urge to stock up on bathroom essentials.

As we delve into this curious conundrum, it is important to recognize the relevance of pediatricians in shaping the well-being of the youngest members of society. These dedicated professionals play a vital role in nurturing the health of children and addressing a myriad of medical needs, from fevers and coughs to the occasional encounter with a curious moose. Meanwhile, toilet paper remains an indispensable commodity, the backbone of personal hygiene and a symbol of preparedness in the face of unforeseen events. Its significance cannot be understated, especially in the context of a state known for its rugged terrain and unpredictable weather patterns. And yet, the intersection of these seemingly disparate elements has left us pondering the intricate dance between pediatricians and the quest for the perfect roll.

In this paper, we commend the rigorous efforts of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the ever-reliable Google Trends in providing us with the data necessary to unlock this curious correlation. Our examination, spanning the years 2004 to 2021, has revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the substantive link between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the resounding chorus of "where to buy toilet paper" searches.

As we embark on this academic escapade, it is our hope that our findings will shed light on the peculiar interplay between healthcare professionals and everyday consumer behaviors, providing a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. So, grab a seat, perhaps a cup of coffee, and prepare to journey with us as we unravel the toilet paper takeover and unveil the perplexing pediatrician-paper paradox in the great northern frontier.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and this study is no exception. While the connection between pediatricians and toilet paper may seem as unlikely as a penguin in the desert, our investigation has uncovered a peculiar correlation that cannot be flushed away. In the vast expanse of Alaska, where the wilderness stretches for miles and the wildlife reigns supreme, we found ourselves embarking on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between pediatric care and the urge to stock up on bathroom essentials.
As we delve into this curious conundrum, it is important to recognize the relevance of pediatricians in shaping the well-being of the youngest members of society. These dedicated professionals play a vital role in nurturing the health of children and addressing a myriad of medical needs, from fevers and coughs to the occasional encounter with a curious moose. Meanwhile, toilet paper remains an indispensable commodity, the backbone of personal hygiene and a symbol of preparedness in the face of unforeseen events. Its significance cannot be understated, especially in the context of a state known for its rugged terrain and unpredictable weather patterns. And yet, the intersection of these seemingly disparate elements has left us pondering the intricate dance between pediatricians and the quest for the perfect roll.
In this paper, we commend the rigorous efforts of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the ever-reliable Google Trends in providing us with the data necessary to unlock this curious correlation. Our examination, spanning the years 2004 to 2021, has revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the substantive link between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the resounding chorus of "where to buy toilet paper" searches.
As we embark on this academic escapade, it is our hope that our findings will shed light on the peculiar interplay between healthcare professionals and everyday consumer behaviors, providing a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. So, grab a seat, perhaps a cup of coffee, and prepare to journey with us as we unravel the toilet paper takeover and unveil the perplexing pediatrician-paper paradox in the great northern frontier.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The association between pediatricians and consumer behavior has tantalized scholars for years, drawing attention from esteemed researchers such as Smith, Doe, and Jones. Their studies, while groundbreaking, failed to address the proverbial elephant in the room – the undeniable allure of 2-ply versus 3-ply toilet paper and its connection to pediatric care in the wilds of Alaska.

In "The Pediatrician Puzzle: Unraveling Healthcare Trends in North America," Smith et al. highlighted the critical role of pediatricians in fostering child health and wellness, but they curiously omitted any mention of bathroom essentials. Meanwhile, Doe's "Consumer Chronicles: From Diapers to Toilet Paper" provided insight into household purchases but overlooked the potential correlation between pediatric care and the urgent quest for toilet paper. Finally, Jones' "Alaska Adventures: Tales of the Last Frontier" regaled readers with gripping accounts of wilderness survival but failed to explore the peculiar bond between pediatricians and the enigmatic allure of the perfect roll.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Economics of Toilet Paper" by Blumberg offered a comprehensive analysis of consumer behavior and purchasing patterns, only to overlook the possibility of a pediatrician influence. Similarly, "Pediatric Perspectives: Navigating Healthcare for Children" by Wang et al. detailed the challenges and triumphs of pediatric care, yet it neglected to mention the potential impact on household toiletry selections.

Now, let us not dismiss the contribution of fiction in shedding light on the intersection between pediatricians and toilet paper pursuits. In "Toilet Troubles: A Pediatrician's Tale" by Swift, the protagonist grapples with medical mysteries and the enigma of disappearing toilet paper rolls. Drawing from contemporary sources, social media posts such as "Toddler Tales: The Chronicles of Parenthood" and "Not Just Child's Play: Parenting in Alaska" showcased anecdotes of pediatrician-run clinics and coincidental spikes in "where to buy toilet paper" queries on Google.

As we journey into the crux of this nonsensical nexus, let us not forget the peculiar ways in which life's tapestry weaves together the most unexpected threads. Our investigation ventures beyond the solemn halls of academia to uncover a correlation that, while seemingly ludicrous, has captured the imagination and curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Thus, we endeavor to unravel this quizzical quagmire and wipe away any doubts surrounding the pediatrician-paper paradox in the Last Frontier.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and this study is no exception. While the connection between pediatricians and toilet paper may seem as unlikely as a penguin in the desert, our investigation has uncovered a peculiar correlation that cannot be flushed away. In the vast expanse of Alaska, where the wilderness stretches for miles and the wildlife reigns supreme, we found ourselves embarking on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between pediatric care and the urge to stock up on bathroom essentials.
As we delve into this curious conundrum, it is important to recognize the relevance of pediatricians in shaping the well-being of the youngest members of society. These dedicated professionals play a vital role in nurturing the health of children and addressing a myriad of medical needs, from fevers and coughs to the occasional encounter with a curious moose. Meanwhile, toilet paper remains an indispensable commodity, the backbone of personal hygiene and a symbol of preparedness in the face of unforeseen events. Its significance cannot be understated, especially in the context of a state known for its rugged terrain and unpredictable weather patterns. And yet, the intersection of these seemingly disparate elements has left us pondering the intricate dance between pediatricians and the quest for the perfect roll.
In this paper, we commend the rigorous efforts of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the ever-reliable Google Trends in providing us with the data necessary to unlock this curious correlation. Our examination, spanning the years 2004 to 2021, has revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the substantive link between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the resounding chorus of "where to buy toilet paper" searches.
As we embark on this academic escapade, it is our hope that our findings will shed light on the peculiar interplay between healthcare professionals and everyday consumer behaviors, providing a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. So, grab a seat, perhaps a cup of coffee, and prepare to journey with us as we unravel the toilet paper takeover and unveil the perplexing pediatrician-paper paradox in the great northern frontier.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle this confounding connection between pediatricians and the hunt for toilet paper in Alaska, we employed an array of data collection and analysis methods that would make even the most skeptical researcher do a double take.

First, we turned to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, like a wise old owl dispensing statistical wisdom, to gather information on the number of pediatricians practicing in the vast and wild expanse of Alaska. Their data, while not as elusive as a mythological creature, provided us with a comprehensive overview of pediatrician employment trends from 2004 to 2021, allowing us to track the ebb and flow of these medical marvels over the years.

Next, we took a swan dive into the world of Google Trends, surfing the digital waves of search queries like intrepid explorers in search of buried treasure. With ‘where to buy toilet paper’ as our trusty treasure map, we gleefully navigated through the peaks and valleys of public interest in toilet paper procurement, reveling in the intriguing patterns that emerged across different seasons and viral phenomena.

Once we had amassed this treasure trove of data, we summoned the statistical gods, also known as ‘correlation coefficient’ and ‘p-value’, to illuminate the potential relationship between pediatricians and the quest for the perfect roll. With our trusty spreadsheet at the ready, we calculated the correlation coefficient like master mathematicians, watching in anticipation as the numbers unveiled the degree of association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Finally, armed with our statistical insights and a sprinkle of curiosity, we embarked on the perilous journey of interpreting our findings, navigating the treacherous terrain of scholarly discourse and the occasional ambush of statistical skepticism with a hearty blend of wit and rigor.

In this manner, our methodological approach combined the precision of data analysis with the audacity of adventure, all in pursuit of shedding light on the enigmatic link between pediatricians and the eternal quest for a fresh supply of toilet paper in the land of the midnight sun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8728541, r-squared of 0.7618744, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and this study is no exception. While the connection between pediatricians and toilet paper may seem as unlikely as a penguin in the desert, our investigation has uncovered a peculiar correlation that cannot be flushed away. In the vast expanse of Alaska, where the wilderness stretches for miles and the wildlife reigns supreme, we found ourselves embarking on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between pediatric care and the urge to stock up on bathroom essentials.
As we delve into this curious conundrum, it is important to recognize the relevance of pediatricians in shaping the well-being of the youngest members of society. These dedicated professionals play a vital role in nurturing the health of children and addressing a myriad of medical needs, from fevers and coughs to the occasional encounter with a curious moose. Meanwhile, toilet paper remains an indispensable commodity, the backbone of personal hygiene and a symbol of preparedness in the face of unforeseen events. Its significance cannot be understated, especially in the context of a state known for its rugged terrain and unpredictable weather patterns. And yet, the intersection of these seemingly disparate elements has left us pondering the intricate dance between pediatricians and the quest for the perfect roll.
In this paper, we commend the rigorous efforts of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the ever-reliable Google Trends in providing us with the data necessary to unlock this curious correlation. Our examination, spanning the years 2004 to 2021, has revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the substantive link between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the resounding chorus of "where to buy toilet paper" searches.
As we embark on this academic escapade, it is our hope that our findings will shed light on the peculiar interplay between healthcare professionals and everyday consumer behaviors, providing a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. So, grab a seat, perhaps a cup of coffee, and prepare to journey with us as we unravel the toilet paper takeover and unveil the perplexing pediatrician-paper paradox in the great northern frontier.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data brought forth intriguing insights into the peculiar relationship between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and an r-squared value of 0.7618744, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.

The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 (not included here, but imagine it being both baffling and beautiful, like a polar bear in a snowstorm) vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the frequency of "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Each data point seems to whisper a tale of pediatric care intertwined with the pressing need for consumer hygiene products, creating a symphony of statistical significance.

The strength of this correlation suggests that the presence of pediatricians exerts a substantial influence on the public's inclination to embark on quests for that most essential of personal provisions – the almighty roll of toilet paper. This correlation, while undeniably remarkable, does raise the question: are pediatricians truly the unsung heroes of the bathroom, silently guiding our consumer behaviors even as they address the health needs of our little ones?

Our study illuminates the unexpected interconnectedness of healthcare professionals and consumer behaviors, offering a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. As we wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox, we open the door to a new understanding of the intricate dance between pediatric care and the ubiquitous quest for the perfect roll. These findings not only add a humorous spin to the academic landscape but also underscore the relevance of seemingly unrelated variables in shaping societal trends.

In conclusion, our journey through the land of pediatricians and toilet paper has unearthed a compelling correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons us to view the world through a different lens. The pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska may remain an enigma, but our findings serve as a testament to the whimsical and wonderful nature of scholarly exploration, proving that even amidst the unlikeliest of pairings, there lies a statistical story waiting to be told.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The association between pediatricians and consumer behavior has tantalized scholars for years, drawing attention from esteemed researchers such as Smith, Doe, and Jones. Their studies, while groundbreaking, failed to address the proverbial elephant in the room – the undeniable allure of 2-ply versus 3-ply toilet paper and its connection to pediatric care in the wilds of Alaska.
In "The Pediatrician Puzzle: Unraveling Healthcare Trends in North America," Smith et al. highlighted the critical role of pediatricians in fostering child health and wellness, but they curiously omitted any mention of bathroom essentials. Meanwhile, Doe's "Consumer Chronicles: From Diapers to Toilet Paper" provided insight into household purchases but overlooked the potential correlation between pediatric care and the urgent quest for toilet paper. Finally, Jones' "Alaska Adventures: Tales of the Last Frontier" regaled readers with gripping accounts of wilderness survival but failed to explore the peculiar bond between pediatricians and the enigmatic allure of the perfect roll.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Economics of Toilet Paper" by Blumberg offered a comprehensive analysis of consumer behavior and purchasing patterns, only to overlook the possibility of a pediatrician influence. Similarly, "Pediatric Perspectives: Navigating Healthcare for Children" by Wang et al. detailed the challenges and triumphs of pediatric care, yet it neglected to mention the potential impact on household toiletry selections.
Now, let us not dismiss the contribution of fiction in shedding light on the intersection between pediatricians and toilet paper pursuits. In "Toilet Troubles: A Pediatrician's Tale" by Swift, the protagonist grapples with medical mysteries and the enigma of disappearing toilet paper rolls. Drawing from contemporary sources, social media posts such as "Toddler Tales: The Chronicles of Parenthood" and "Not Just Child's Play: Parenting in Alaska" showcased anecdotes of pediatrician-run clinics and coincidental spikes in "where to buy toilet paper" queries on Google.
As we journey into the crux of this nonsensical nexus, let us not forget the peculiar ways in which life's tapestry weaves together the most unexpected threads. Our investigation ventures beyond the solemn halls of academia to uncover a correlation that, while seemingly ludicrous, has captured the imagination and curiosity of scholars and laypersons alike. Thus, we endeavor to unravel this quizzical quagmire and wipe away any doubts surrounding the pediatrician-paper paradox in the Last Frontier.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data brought forth intriguing insights into the peculiar relationship between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and an r-squared value of 0.7618744, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 (not included here, but imagine it being both baffling and beautiful, like a polar bear in a snowstorm) vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the frequency of "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Each data point seems to whisper a tale of pediatric care intertwined with the pressing need for consumer hygiene products, creating a symphony of statistical significance.
The strength of this correlation suggests that the presence of pediatricians exerts a substantial influence on the public's inclination to embark on quests for that most essential of personal provisions – the almighty roll of toilet paper. This correlation, while undeniably remarkable, does raise the question: are pediatricians truly the unsung heroes of the bathroom, silently guiding our consumer behaviors even as they address the health needs of our little ones?
Our study illuminates the unexpected interconnectedness of healthcare professionals and consumer behaviors, offering a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. As we wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox, we open the door to a new understanding of the intricate dance between pediatric care and the ubiquitous quest for the perfect roll. These findings not only add a humorous spin to the academic landscape but also underscore the relevance of seemingly unrelated variables in shaping societal trends.
In conclusion, our journey through the land of pediatricians and toilet paper has unearthed a compelling correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons us to view the world through a different lens. The pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska may remain an enigma, but our findings serve as a testament to the whimsical and wonderful nature of scholarly exploration, proving that even amidst the unlikeliest of pairings, there lies a statistical story waiting to be told.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study sought to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Delving into the hallowed halls of statistical analyses, we emerged with results that not only confirmed the existence of the pediatrician-paper paradox but also added a touch of whimsy to the world of scholarly pursuits. In the words of Mark Twain, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started," and so, with that sage advice in mind, we embarked on this unconventional journey of discovery.

Returning to the esteemed researchers who have paved the way for our investigation, it is imperative to consider the groundbreaking work of Smith, Doe, and Jones. While their studies may have tiptoed around the issue of toilet paper and pediatric care, our findings substantiate the possibility that these disparate realms are, in fact, intertwined. As William Shakespeare once mused, "All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players," and indeed, our study paints a curious picture wherein pediatricians play a role not only in addressing the health needs of children but also in influencing the consumer behaviors of the larger populace.

The statistical correlation we uncovered suggests that the presence of pediatricians exerts a more substantial influence on public toilet paper quests than previously imagined, creating a captivating tableau of healthcare professionals covertly shaping household toiletry selections. As our findings add a humorous twist to the scholarly landscape, they underscore the relevance of seemingly unrelated variables in shaping societal trends, echoing the words of Oscar Wilde: "Life is too important to be taken seriously."

While some may scoff at the notion of pediatricians as arbiters of bathroom essentials, our results paint a compelling portrait of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. The pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska may remain an enigma, but our findings serve as a testament to the whimsical and wonderful nature of scholarly exploration, reaffirming the notion that even in the unlikeliest of pairings, there lies a statistical story waiting to be told. And so, dear reader, as we stand on the precipice of this revelatory discovery, let us remember the timeless words of Dr. Seuss: "Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple." Indeed, in our quest to decipher the pediatrician-paper paradox, the answer lies not in complexity, but in embracing the delightfully unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pediatricians in Alaska and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and this study is no exception. While the connection between pediatricians and toilet paper may seem as unlikely as a penguin in the desert, our investigation has uncovered a peculiar correlation that cannot be flushed away. In the vast expanse of Alaska, where the wilderness stretches for miles and the wildlife reigns supreme, we found ourselves embarking on a journey to unravel the enigmatic link between pediatric care and the urge to stock up on bathroom essentials.
As we delve into this curious conundrum, it is important to recognize the relevance of pediatricians in shaping the well-being of the youngest members of society. These dedicated professionals play a vital role in nurturing the health of children and addressing a myriad of medical needs, from fevers and coughs to the occasional encounter with a curious moose. Meanwhile, toilet paper remains an indispensable commodity, the backbone of personal hygiene and a symbol of preparedness in the face of unforeseen events. Its significance cannot be understated, especially in the context of a state known for its rugged terrain and unpredictable weather patterns. And yet, the intersection of these seemingly disparate elements has left us pondering the intricate dance between pediatricians and the quest for the perfect roll.
In this paper, we commend the rigorous efforts of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the ever-reliable Google Trends in providing us with the data necessary to unlock this curious correlation. Our examination, spanning the years 2004 to 2021, has revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the substantive link between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the resounding chorus of "where to buy toilet paper" searches.
As we embark on this academic escapade, it is our hope that our findings will shed light on the peculiar interplay between healthcare professionals and everyday consumer behaviors, providing a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. So, grab a seat, perhaps a cup of coffee, and prepare to journey with us as we unravel the toilet paper takeover and unveil the perplexing pediatrician-paper paradox in the great northern frontier.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data brought forth intriguing insights into the peculiar relationship between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and an r-squared value of 0.7618744, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables.
The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 (not included here, but imagine it being both baffling and beautiful, like a polar bear in a snowstorm) vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and the frequency of "where to buy toilet paper" searches. Each data point seems to whisper a tale of pediatric care intertwined with the pressing need for consumer hygiene products, creating a symphony of statistical significance.
The strength of this correlation suggests that the presence of pediatricians exerts a substantial influence on the public's inclination to embark on quests for that most essential of personal provisions – the almighty roll of toilet paper. This correlation, while undeniably remarkable, does raise the question: are pediatricians truly the unsung heroes of the bathroom, silently guiding our consumer behaviors even as they address the health needs of our little ones?
Our study illuminates the unexpected interconnectedness of healthcare professionals and consumer behaviors, offering a whimsical twist in the realm of scholarly inquiries. As we wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox, we open the door to a new understanding of the intricate dance between pediatric care and the ubiquitous quest for the perfect roll. These findings not only add a humorous spin to the academic landscape but also underscore the relevance of seemingly unrelated variables in shaping societal trends.
In conclusion, our journey through the land of pediatricians and toilet paper has unearthed a compelling correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons us to view the world through a different lens. The pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska may remain an enigma, but our findings serve as a testament to the whimsical and wonderful nature of scholarly exploration, proving that even amidst the unlikeliest of pairings, there lies a statistical story waiting to be told.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches, we have emerged with findings that are as intriguing as they are eyebrow-raising. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and a p-value less than 0.01 between 2004 and 2021 have certainly given us pause, prompting us to ponder the whimsical interplay between pediatric care and the pursuit of the perfect roll.

As we wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox, we find ourselves in a peculiar position. It seems that pediatricians, those stalwart guardians of childhood health, may also be subtle influencers of our consumer behaviors, silently guiding the elusive quest for bathroom essentials. Who knew that amidst the moose and snow-capped mountains of Alaska, there lay statistical evidence of pediatricians doubling as unsung heroes of the bathroom aisle?

Our findings not only add a splash of humor to the academic journey but also emphasize the unpredictably delightful nature of empirical research. Nonetheless, as we bid adieu to this paper, we assert with great solemnity that no further inquiry is warranted in this peculiar realm of pediatrician-paper interactions. For, as Shakespeare might say, the findings are as sound as a pound, and it's time to give this topic a well-deserved rest.

So, let us raise a metaphorical roll of toilet paper in honor of the pediatrician-paper paradox in the great northern frontier - a statistical oddity that will forever remain embossed in the annals of scholarly whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Northern Pediatric Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Arctic Childhood Health Research Association


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wipe Not, Want Not: Unraveling the Pediatrician-Paper Paradox in Alaska with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the fascinating world of pediatricians and toilet paper in the Last Frontier. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we set out to uncover the elusive connection between the number of pediatricians in Alaska and public interest in "where to buy toilet paper" searches. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8728541 and p < 0.01 between 2004 and 2021, our findings shed light on the seemingly unexpected relationship between pediatric care and personal hygiene products. Join us as we unravel this toilet paper trail and wipe away the mystery behind the pediatrician-paper paradox in Alaska.

ChatGPT:

pediatricians, Alaska, toilet paper, public interest, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, pediatric care, personal hygiene products, pediatrician-paper paradox

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of pediatricians in Alaska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of pediatricians, general in Alaska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of pediatricians in Alaska

Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

Correlation r = 0.8728541 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7618744 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of pediatricians in Alaska) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.3E-6. 0.0000022873628457153504000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.00023% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 437,185 random variables You don't actually need 437 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of pediatricians in Alaska (Pediatricians, General)5060905050504030405050304050503017070
Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' (Rel. search volume)0.3333330.5833330.3333330.083333300.3333330.50.2510.83333311111112.58331




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50,60,90,50,50,50,40,30,40,50,50,30,40,50,50,30,170,70,])
array_2 = np.array([0.333333,0.583333,0.333333,0.0833333,0,0.333333,0.5,0.25,1,0.833333,1,1,1,1,1,1,12.5833,1,])
array_1_name = "The number of pediatricians in Alaska"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2919 · Black Variable ID: 16870 · Red Variable ID: 1385
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0