about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,926 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and the second variable is Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As bottled water consumption rose, so did the demand for plastic bottles. This led to a surge in the need for petroleum, which is a key component in plastic production. With Pioneer Natural Resources Company being a major player in the oil and gas industry, their stock price flowed upwards, riding the wave of liquid profits. It's like the stock was saying, "H2-Oh yeah, this is refreshing for my portfolio!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that is hyper-realistic, depicting a scene where a graph shows a rising line for US Bottled Water Consumption per Person. The graph is prominently displayed, with precise and detailed lines and data points. On the graph, there is an image of a person holding a bottle of water and looking inspired, with a sense of optimism and determination in their eyes. Adjacent to this, there is a financial chart displaying Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) rapidly ascending. The stock chart is intricate, with realistic details and precise lines indicating the upward movement of the stock price. Additionally, people are depicted enthusiastically investing in the company, showcasing their excitement and confidence. The figures investing are realistic and detailed, capturing the fervor and activity of the investment scene. Ensure that both the water consumption graph and the stock price chart are portrayed with hyper-realistic precision, and the characters are depicted with authentic emotions, adding depth and vibrancy to the entire scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Symbolism Cute 2D animation Hyper-realistic Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD), in the following situation: Because as people drank more bottled water, they got more hydrated and started having constant "eureka" moments, leading to a surge in innovative ideas. Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price shot up as everyone wanted to invest in a company leading the "hydration innovation" revolution.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a graph showing a rising line for US Bottled Water Consumption per Person, with an image of a person holding a bottle of water and looking inspired. Alongside this, there is a financial chart displaying Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) rapidly ascending, while people are depicted enthusiastically investing in the company.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a graph showing a rising line for US Bottled Water Consumption per Person, with an image of a person holding a bottle of water and looking inspired. Alongside this, there is a financial chart displaying Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) rapidly ascending, while people are depicted enthusiastically investing in the company. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that is hyper-realistic, depicting a scene where a graph shows a rising line for US Bottled Water Consumption per Person. The graph is prominently displayed, with precise and detailed lines and data points. On the graph, there is an image of a person holding a bottle of water and looking inspired, with a sense of optimism and determination in their eyes. Adjacent to this, there is a financial chart displaying Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) rapidly ascending. The stock chart is intricate, with realistic details and precise lines indicating the upward movement of the stock price. Additionally, people are depicted enthusiastically investing in the company, showcasing their excitement and confidence. The figures investing are realistic and detailed, capturing the fervor and activity of the investment scene. Ensure that both the water consumption graph and the stock price chart are portrayed with hyper-realistic precision, and the characters are depicted with authentic emotions, adding depth and vibrancy to the entire scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

The Journal of Quirky Economic Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The economic world is a vast, complex sea of interconnected factors, where waves of influence can often be hard to predict. In this ocean of market dynamics, the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena can lead to unexpected findings that both quench our intellectual thirst and leave us wondering if anything is truly disconnected. Our research delves into the intriguing link between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD), a quenching exploration that challenges traditional notions of market influences.

At first glance, the notion of linking the consumption of bottled water with the stock performance of a natural resources company may seem like comparing apples to, well, bottled water. However, behind this seemingly unconventional pairing lies a fascinating thread of correlation that has flowed beneath the surface of economic analysis for years.

As casual observers of the market, we are often quick to dismiss certain factors as negligible droplets in the vast ocean of economic forces. Yet, as we discovered in this study, the fluctuations in the consumption of bottled water and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may not merely be surface ripples but deep undercurrents influencing one another in unexpected ways.

In this paper, we present the results of our analysis, which reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a substantial span from 2002 to 2022. These findings challenge conventional wisdom and beckon further exploration into the ebbs and flows of market interactions.

While some may perceive this research as merely a drop in the vast ocean of economic inquiry, we believe that it has stirred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered in our study may well leave investors eagerly thirsting for a deeper understanding of the whimsical ways of the stock market and the currents that drive its movements. Thus, join us on this refreshing journey through the sometimes murky waters of economic analysis, and let us sail into uncharted territories where the tides of correlation and causation converge in unexpected ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The economic world is a vast, complex sea of interconnected factors, where waves of influence can often be hard to predict. In this ocean of market dynamics, the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena can lead to unexpected findings that both quench our intellectual thirst and leave us wondering if anything is truly disconnected. Our research delves into the intriguing link between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD), a quenching exploration that challenges traditional notions of market influences.
At first glance, the notion of linking the consumption of bottled water with the stock performance of a natural resources company may seem like comparing apples to, well, bottled water. However, behind this seemingly unconventional pairing lies a fascinating thread of correlation that has flowed beneath the surface of economic analysis for years.
As casual observers of the market, we are often quick to dismiss certain factors as negligible droplets in the vast ocean of economic forces. Yet, as we discovered in this study, the fluctuations in the consumption of bottled water and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may not merely be surface ripples but deep undercurrents influencing one another in unexpected ways.
In this paper, we present the results of our analysis, which reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a substantial span from 2002 to 2022. These findings challenge conventional wisdom and beckon further exploration into the ebbs and flows of market interactions.
While some may perceive this research as merely a drop in the vast ocean of economic inquiry, we believe that it has stirred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered in our study may well leave investors eagerly thirsting for a deeper understanding of the whimsical ways of the stock market and the currents that drive its movements. Thus, join us on this refreshing journey through the sometimes murky waters of economic analysis, and let us sail into uncharted territories where the tides of correlation and causation converge in unexpected ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the curious correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) has spurred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. A review of existing literature on unrelated yet interlinked phenomena serves as a crucial determinant in understanding the potential undercurrents influencing these unexpected correlations.

Smith et al. (2015) delve into the complexities of consumer behavior and its potential impact on stock market dynamics in their work on "Consumer Choices and Market Responses." Their findings provide a solid foundation for understanding the nuances of seemingly unrelated consumer preferences and investment patterns. Similarly, Doe (2017) examines the influence of environmental factors on stock performance in "Green Markets and Sustainable Stocks," shedding light on the unanticipated connections that may emerge between environmental consciousness and investment choices.

Moving beyond the direct economic impacts, Jones (2019) investigates the psychological aspects of consumer decision-making in "The Mindful Consumer," unraveling how subconscious preferences can sway market trends. Meanwhile, in "Water: A Biography" by Fishman (2011), a compelling narrative on the ubiquitous presence of water in our lives offers a thought-provoking parallel to the omnipresence of market influences, urging a deeper exploration into the far-reaching consequences of seemingly innocuous phenomena.

Exploring the whimsical ways of the stock market through a fictional lens, the surreal scenarios of Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore" and the suspense-filled plot twists of Christie's "The Stock Market Mysteries" hint at the enigmatic forces that may intertwine seemingly unrelated phenomena in an intricate web of influence. Furthering the investigation into unexpected sources of correlation, the present study undertakes a thorough analysis of an unorthodox array of materials, including but not limited to cryptic fortune cookie messages, whimsical observations from overheard conversations on public transportation, and a meticulous scrutiny of CVS receipts as a compelling source of market trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The economic world is a vast, complex sea of interconnected factors, where waves of influence can often be hard to predict. In this ocean of market dynamics, the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena can lead to unexpected findings that both quench our intellectual thirst and leave us wondering if anything is truly disconnected. Our research delves into the intriguing link between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD), a quenching exploration that challenges traditional notions of market influences.
At first glance, the notion of linking the consumption of bottled water with the stock performance of a natural resources company may seem like comparing apples to, well, bottled water. However, behind this seemingly unconventional pairing lies a fascinating thread of correlation that has flowed beneath the surface of economic analysis for years.
As casual observers of the market, we are often quick to dismiss certain factors as negligible droplets in the vast ocean of economic forces. Yet, as we discovered in this study, the fluctuations in the consumption of bottled water and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may not merely be surface ripples but deep undercurrents influencing one another in unexpected ways.
In this paper, we present the results of our analysis, which reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a substantial span from 2002 to 2022. These findings challenge conventional wisdom and beckon further exploration into the ebbs and flows of market interactions.
While some may perceive this research as merely a drop in the vast ocean of economic inquiry, we believe that it has stirred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered in our study may well leave investors eagerly thirsting for a deeper understanding of the whimsical ways of the stock market and the currents that drive its movements. Thus, join us on this refreshing journey through the sometimes murky waters of economic analysis, and let us sail into uncharted territories where the tides of correlation and causation converge in unexpected ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To quench the thirst for understanding the link between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD), a variety of data collection techniques were employed. The research team cast a wide net across the internet, reeling in data from various sources, but mainly relying on the reliable catch from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). The timeframe for the data collection spanned from 2002 to 2022, allowing for a long-term analysis of the trends in both bottled water consumption and stock price fluctuations.

Our approach involved a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods, resembling a refreshing blend of clear and sparkling water. The quantitative aspect involved meticulous data scraping from reputable sources, while the qualitative aspect included sifting through industry reports and market analyses to catch any potential hidden correlations.

The collected data underwent a rigorous filtration process, akin to purifying water, to ensure its reliability and accuracy. Any questionable or murky data points were filtered out, leaving a clear and transparent dataset to be analyzed.

Statistical analyses were then performed using advanced econometric models, resembling the distillation process of separating pure correlation from confounding variables. The correlation coefficient was calculated to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between US bottled water consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price. Additionally, the p-value was determined to assess the statistical significance of the correlation, providing an indicator of whether the observed relationship was more than just a simple splash in the data.

To further enhance the robustness of our analysis, sensitivity tests were conducted to ensure that the findings held water across various sub-periods within the overall timeframe. This approach helped in validating the stability of the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock price, ensuring that the results were not merely fleeting waves in the vast ocean of market data.

Overall, the methodology employed in this study lays the foundation for a thorough, comprehensive analysis of the unexpected connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. While the methods employed may seem as clear as drinking water, the depth and breadth of the analytical approach reflect a commitment to uncovering the underlying currents of market dynamics in a refreshing and intellectually stimulating manner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8517116, r-squared of 0.7254126, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The economic world is a vast, complex sea of interconnected factors, where waves of influence can often be hard to predict. In this ocean of market dynamics, the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena can lead to unexpected findings that both quench our intellectual thirst and leave us wondering if anything is truly disconnected. Our research delves into the intriguing link between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD), a quenching exploration that challenges traditional notions of market influences.
At first glance, the notion of linking the consumption of bottled water with the stock performance of a natural resources company may seem like comparing apples to, well, bottled water. However, behind this seemingly unconventional pairing lies a fascinating thread of correlation that has flowed beneath the surface of economic analysis for years.
As casual observers of the market, we are often quick to dismiss certain factors as negligible droplets in the vast ocean of economic forces. Yet, as we discovered in this study, the fluctuations in the consumption of bottled water and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may not merely be surface ripples but deep undercurrents influencing one another in unexpected ways.
In this paper, we present the results of our analysis, which reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a substantial span from 2002 to 2022. These findings challenge conventional wisdom and beckon further exploration into the ebbs and flows of market interactions.
While some may perceive this research as merely a drop in the vast ocean of economic inquiry, we believe that it has stirred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered in our study may well leave investors eagerly thirsting for a deeper understanding of the whimsical ways of the stock market and the currents that drive its movements. Thus, join us on this refreshing journey through the sometimes murky waters of economic analysis, and let us sail into uncharted territories where the tides of correlation and causation converge in unexpected ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) over the period of 2002 to 2022. This correlation coefficient indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables, suggesting that as bottled water consumption per person increased, the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company tended to rise as well.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7254126 demonstrates that approximately 72.54% of the variability in Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price can be explained by the changes in US bottled water consumption per person. This finding underscores the substantial influence of bottled water consumption on the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a relationship that is far from being a mere drop in the bucket of economic influences.

The p-value of less than 0.01 signifies that the observed correlation is statistically significant, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. This result encourages us to dive deeper into exploring the underlying mechanisms and potential causality behind this intriguing relationship.

Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. The scatterplot showcases the upward trend, indicating the synchronicity between the two variables and the compelling nature of their connection.

In conclusion, these findings not only quench the thirst for understanding the enigmatic interplay of market dynamics but also prompt further exploration into the uncharted waters of economic influences. The unexpected correlation between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company challenges conventional perceptions and leaves us pondering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in the ever-fluid realm of market forces.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the curious correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) has spurred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. A review of existing literature on unrelated yet interlinked phenomena serves as a crucial determinant in understanding the potential undercurrents influencing these unexpected correlations.
Smith et al. (2015) delve into the complexities of consumer behavior and its potential impact on stock market dynamics in their work on "Consumer Choices and Market Responses." Their findings provide a solid foundation for understanding the nuances of seemingly unrelated consumer preferences and investment patterns. Similarly, Doe (2017) examines the influence of environmental factors on stock performance in "Green Markets and Sustainable Stocks," shedding light on the unanticipated connections that may emerge between environmental consciousness and investment choices.
Moving beyond the direct economic impacts, Jones (2019) investigates the psychological aspects of consumer decision-making in "The Mindful Consumer," unraveling how subconscious preferences can sway market trends. Meanwhile, in "Water: A Biography" by Fishman (2011), a compelling narrative on the ubiquitous presence of water in our lives offers a thought-provoking parallel to the omnipresence of market influences, urging a deeper exploration into the far-reaching consequences of seemingly innocuous phenomena.
Exploring the whimsical ways of the stock market through a fictional lens, the surreal scenarios of Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore" and the suspense-filled plot twists of Christie's "The Stock Market Mysteries" hint at the enigmatic forces that may intertwine seemingly unrelated phenomena in an intricate web of influence. Furthering the investigation into unexpected sources of correlation, the present study undertakes a thorough analysis of an unorthodox array of materials, including but not limited to cryptic fortune cookie messages, whimsical observations from overheard conversations on public transportation, and a meticulous scrutiny of CVS receipts as a compelling source of market trends.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) over the period of 2002 to 2022. This correlation coefficient indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables, suggesting that as bottled water consumption per person increased, the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company tended to rise as well.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7254126 demonstrates that approximately 72.54% of the variability in Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price can be explained by the changes in US bottled water consumption per person. This finding underscores the substantial influence of bottled water consumption on the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a relationship that is far from being a mere drop in the bucket of economic influences.
The p-value of less than 0.01 signifies that the observed correlation is statistically significant, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. This result encourages us to dive deeper into exploring the underlying mechanisms and potential causality behind this intriguing relationship.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. The scatterplot showcases the upward trend, indicating the synchronicity between the two variables and the compelling nature of their connection.
In conclusion, these findings not only quench the thirst for understanding the enigmatic interplay of market dynamics but also prompt further exploration into the uncharted waters of economic influences. The unexpected correlation between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company challenges conventional perceptions and leaves us pondering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in the ever-fluid realm of market forces.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected correlation uncovered in this study between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) lends credence to the whimsical observations from overheard conversations on public transportation and the meticulous scrutiny of CVS receipts as a compelling source of market trends as outlined in the literature review. Our findings not only corroborate the intriguing parallels drawn by Fishman (2011) between the omnipresence of market influences and the ubiquitous presence of water in our lives but also align with the surreal scenarios presented in Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore" and the suspense-filled plot twists of Christie's "The Stock Market Mysteries." It appears that the enigmatic forces hinted at in these fictional works may indeed intertwine seemingly unrelated phenomena in an intricate web of influence, as suggested by the robust correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01 observed in our study.

Building on the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017), our results underscore the potential undercurrents influencing the unexpected correlations between consumer behaviors and stock market movements. The strong positive linear relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, as evidenced by the notable correlation coefficient and the r-squared value of 0.7254126, implies that approximately 72.54% of the variability in Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price can be explained by changes in bottled water consumption. This finding reinforces the substantial influence of consumer preferences on investment patterns, aligning with the complexities of consumer behavior elucidated by Smith et al. (2015) and the influence of environmental factors explored by Doe (2017).

Furthermore, our study resonates with Jones (2019) in shedding light on the potential psychological aspects of consumer decision-making, as the observed correlation underscores the need to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential causality behind this intriguing relationship. The unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in the domain of market forces challenges conventional perceptions and leaves us pondering the fascinating parallels between consumer preferences and investment choices.

In light of these findings, our study makes a splash in the world of economic research by highlighting the unanticipated connections that may emerge between consumer behaviors and stock market dynamics, leaving investors thirsting for more insight into the unpredictable yet interconnected nature of the stock market. More research is warranted to unravel the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected correlation and to elucidate the potential implications for investment strategies in the ever-fluid realm of market forces.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The economic world is a vast, complex sea of interconnected factors, where waves of influence can often be hard to predict. In this ocean of market dynamics, the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena can lead to unexpected findings that both quench our intellectual thirst and leave us wondering if anything is truly disconnected. Our research delves into the intriguing link between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD), a quenching exploration that challenges traditional notions of market influences.
At first glance, the notion of linking the consumption of bottled water with the stock performance of a natural resources company may seem like comparing apples to, well, bottled water. However, behind this seemingly unconventional pairing lies a fascinating thread of correlation that has flowed beneath the surface of economic analysis for years.
As casual observers of the market, we are often quick to dismiss certain factors as negligible droplets in the vast ocean of economic forces. Yet, as we discovered in this study, the fluctuations in the consumption of bottled water and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may not merely be surface ripples but deep undercurrents influencing one another in unexpected ways.
In this paper, we present the results of our analysis, which reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 over a substantial span from 2002 to 2022. These findings challenge conventional wisdom and beckon further exploration into the ebbs and flows of market interactions.
While some may perceive this research as merely a drop in the vast ocean of economic inquiry, we believe that it has stirred a confluence of interest in the broader implications of seemingly disparate consumer behaviors and stock market movements. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered in our study may well leave investors eagerly thirsting for a deeper understanding of the whimsical ways of the stock market and the currents that drive its movements. Thus, join us on this refreshing journey through the sometimes murky waters of economic analysis, and let us sail into uncharted territories where the tides of correlation and causation converge in unexpected ways.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) over the period of 2002 to 2022. This correlation coefficient indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables, suggesting that as bottled water consumption per person increased, the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company tended to rise as well.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7254126 demonstrates that approximately 72.54% of the variability in Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price can be explained by the changes in US bottled water consumption per person. This finding underscores the substantial influence of bottled water consumption on the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company, a relationship that is far from being a mere drop in the bucket of economic influences.
The p-value of less than 0.01 signifies that the observed correlation is statistically significant, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. This result encourages us to dive deeper into exploring the underlying mechanisms and potential causality behind this intriguing relationship.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. The scatterplot showcases the upward trend, indicating the synchronicity between the two variables and the compelling nature of their connection.
In conclusion, these findings not only quench the thirst for understanding the enigmatic interplay of market dynamics but also prompt further exploration into the uncharted waters of economic influences. The unexpected correlation between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company challenges conventional perceptions and leaves us pondering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in the ever-fluid realm of market forces.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scholarly voyage has illuminated a remarkable connection between US bottled water consumption and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). The correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 reaffirms our suspicion that these seemingly unrelated variables have been secretly doing the tango in the market dance floor. It's as if the stock market and consumer thirst are two star-crossed lovers, destined to influence each other's performance.

The substantial r-squared value of 0.7254126 demonstrates that almost three-quarters of PXD's stock price variability can be explained by the ebb and flow of bottled water consumption. One might say it's not just the tides that are influenced by the moon but also stock prices influenced by the swells of water bottles.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a picture worth a thousand words, illustrating the synchronized dance between bottled water consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price. While some may see it as just a plot, we've found it to be a compelling narrative of their intertwined fates.

As we close the tap on this study, we assert that no further research is warranted in this area. The evidence presented here pours cold water on any remaining doubts and establishes a clear connection, leaving us with a refreshing understanding of the whimsical ways of the stock market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Economic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Aquatic Financial Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Thirsty Stock Market: A Quenching Look at the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Pioneer Natural Resources Company's Stock Price with an abstract of This study quenches the thirst for knowledge by diving into the unlikely connection between US bottled water consumption per person and the stock price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD). While this relationship may seem as clear as water, our research team utilized data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8517116 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the span of 2002 to 2022. The results not only make a splash in the world of economic research but also offer a refreshing take on the unpredictability of market influences. Our findings suggest that, despite their seemingly unrelated nature, the consumption habits of bottled water and the stock performance of Pioneer Natural Resources Company may be more interconnected than previously thought. This unexpected correlation may leave investors thirsting for more insight into the whimsical ways of the stock market.

ChatGPT:

stock market, bottled water consumption, Pioneer Natural Resources Company, correlation, economic research, market influences, stock performance, data analysis, market correlation, consumer behavior, investment trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person

Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (PXD) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD)

Correlation r = 0.8517116 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7254126 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.7E-7. 0.0000009693738156687860000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 9.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,031,594 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons)20.121.623.225.427.62928.527.628.329.230.83234.136.5394242.34445.24746.5
Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD) (Stock price)19.0125.532.033551.639.6948.7716.3749.3887.8691.84109.43182.95147.54125.19182.99174.3128.78152.02115.02180.69




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.1,21.6,23.2,25.4,27.6,29,28.5,27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,46.5,])
array_2 = np.array([19.01,25.5,32.03,35,51.6,39.69,48.77,16.37,49.38,87.86,91.84,109.43,182.95,147.54,125.19,182.99,174.3,128.78,152.02,115.02,180.69,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Pioneer Natural Resources Company's stock price (PXD)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2926 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 1718
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0