about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,992 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and the second variable is Tesla's stock price (TSLA).  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The air pollution in Taos, New Mexico created a demand for electric cars, leading to an increase in Tesla's stock price as investors anticipated higher sales in the area where people were looking to switch to cleaner vehicles. This shift in consumer behavior boosted confidence in Tesla's market performance, driving up their stock price.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a hyper-realistic scene in which the smog-filled skies over Taos, New Mexico obscure the view of the rugged mountains in the distance. Amidst the haze, residents are depicted wandering the streets, their faces obscured by masks. In the midst of this cityscape, a line of sleek Tesla electric cars weaves through the congestion, their streamlined forms and glossy surfaces cutting through the polluted air. The cars are depicted in high demand, reflecting the soaring stock prices for Tesla (TSLA) and the growing interest in sustainable transportation solutions. The setting should capture the contrast between the natural beauty of the mountains and the urban congestion, emphasizing the technological and environmental themes present in the prompt. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Hyper-realistic Low poly Pop art Charcoal
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA), in the following situation: Because the increase in air pollution in Taos, New Mexico led to residents hallucinating and believing they were living in a futuristic, dystopian society, causing a surge in demand for Tesla's electric cars and sending their stock price through the roof.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The smog-filled skies over Taos, New Mexico obscure the view of the rugged mountains in the distance. Amidst the haze, residents wander the streets, their faces obscured by masks. Yet, despite the pollution, a line of sleek Tesla electric cars weaves through the city, their quiet hum cutting through the polluted air. The electric cars are in high demand as stock prices for Tesla (TSLA) soar, reflecting the growing interest in sustainable transportation solutions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: The smog-filled skies over Taos, New Mexico obscure the view of the rugged mountains in the distance. Amidst the haze, residents wander the streets, their faces obscured by masks. Yet, despite the pollution, a line of sleek Tesla electric cars weaves through the city, their quiet hum cutting through the polluted air. The electric cars are in high demand as stock prices for Tesla (TSLA) soar, reflecting the growing interest in sustainable transportation solutions. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a hyper-realistic scene in which the smog-filled skies over Taos, New Mexico obscure the view of the rugged mountains in the distance. Amidst the haze, residents are depicted wandering the streets, their faces obscured by masks. In the midst of this cityscape, a line of sleek Tesla electric cars weaves through the congestion, their streamlined forms and glossy surfaces cutting through the polluted air. The cars are depicted in high demand, reflecting the soaring stock prices for Tesla (TSLA) and the growing interest in sustainable transportation solutions. The setting should capture the contrast between the natural beauty of the mountains and the urban congestion, emphasizing the technological and environmental themes present in the prompt.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico caused Tesla's stock price (TSLA) to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

The Journal of Eclectic Environmental Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Welcome, esteemed researchers, stock enthusiasts, and fellow aficionados of the absurd! In this whimsical expedition through the realms of finance and environmental science, we embark on a mission to uncover the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels of Taos, New Mexico, and the stock price of the enigmatic electric vehicle juggernaut, Tesla Inc. (TSLA).

Prepare to be amused as we traverse the convoluted landscapes of Wall Street and the serene vistas of Taos, where the air is as fresh as the humor in this paper. Our findings promise to tickle your fancy and perhaps leave you scratching your head in disbelief at the improbable dance between air quality and stock market performance.

Now, take a deep breath and brace yourselves for a research journey filled with gags, jests, and the occasional pun – because why should academic papers be devoid of humor? Join us as we unravel the tantalizing tale of "Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox," where financial data meets fresh air in a rather unexpected waltz of wit and wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome, esteemed researchers, stock enthusiasts, and fellow aficionados of the absurd! In this whimsical expedition through the realms of finance and environmental science, we embark on a mission to uncover the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels of Taos, New Mexico, and the stock price of the enigmatic electric vehicle juggernaut, Tesla Inc. (TSLA).
Prepare to be amused as we traverse the convoluted landscapes of Wall Street and the serene vistas of Taos, where the air is as fresh as the humor in this paper. Our findings promise to tickle your fancy and perhaps leave you scratching your head in disbelief at the improbable dance between air quality and stock market performance.
Now, take a deep breath and brace yourselves for a research journey filled with gags, jests, and the occasional pun – because why should academic papers be devoid of humor? Join us as we unravel the tantalizing tale of "Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox," where financial data meets fresh air in a rather unexpected waltz of wit and wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing literature on the correlation between air pollution and stock prices has primarily focused on urban areas with high industrial activity and dense populations. Smith et al. (2015) found a significant negative association between air quality index and stock performance in major metropolitan cities. Doe and Jones (2018) corroborated these findings, highlighting the adverse impact of air pollution on the financial markets of densely populated regions.

Turning to the realm of environmental economics, "The Economics of Air Quality" by Johnson and Smith (2009) delves into the economic consequences of air pollution, emphasizing the detrimental effects on public health and productivity. In a similar vein, "Polluted Promises: Environmental Chicanery and Commodification" by Adams (2013) offers insightful perspectives on the intersection of environmental degradation and economic ramifications, shedding light on the multifaceted implications of air pollution.

In the world of fiction, "The Air We Breathe" by A. Clear (2007) presents a dystopian narrative where corporations profit from selling clean air in a post-apocalyptic world, serving as a cautionary tale about the commodification of environmental resources. Likewise, "Emissions of Enigma" by R. Mystery (2015) offers a suspenseful portrayal of a clandestine conspiracy involving air pollution and financial markets, blurring the lines between reality and fiction.

Expanding our search into unconventional sources, the researchers encountered a peculiar trove of wisdom in the most unexpected of places – CVS receipts. Amidst the cacophony of discounts and promotions, these mundane slips of paper offered surprisingly profound insights into the whims of consumer behavior and the tangential musings of the stock market. While it remains to be seen whether the correlation between air pollution in Taos and Tesla's stock price is elucidated in the fine print of a CVS receipt, the authors cannot discount the serendipitous journey that led them to this realization.

As we navigate through the literature on air pollution and its unlikely companions, the connection between Taos' atmosphere and Tesla's stock price emerges as a whimsical enigma deserving of further exploration. While the juxtaposition of finance and fresh air may seem surreal, the forthcoming analysis aims to unravel the paradoxical relationship with a touch of levity and scholarly rigor.

Stay tuned for the delightfully absurd analysis that awaits, where we weave together the threads of air quality and stock market performance in a tapestry of whimsy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome, esteemed researchers, stock enthusiasts, and fellow aficionados of the absurd! In this whimsical expedition through the realms of finance and environmental science, we embark on a mission to uncover the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels of Taos, New Mexico, and the stock price of the enigmatic electric vehicle juggernaut, Tesla Inc. (TSLA).
Prepare to be amused as we traverse the convoluted landscapes of Wall Street and the serene vistas of Taos, where the air is as fresh as the humor in this paper. Our findings promise to tickle your fancy and perhaps leave you scratching your head in disbelief at the improbable dance between air quality and stock market performance.
Now, take a deep breath and brace yourselves for a research journey filled with gags, jests, and the occasional pun – because why should academic papers be devoid of humor? Join us as we unravel the tantalizing tale of "Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox," where financial data meets fresh air in a rather unexpected waltz of wit and wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Prepare to be amused as we reveal the convoluted methodology behind this whimsical research endeavor. Our team of intrepid researchers donned their metaphorical detective hats and embarked on a data-gathering odyssey that took us from the dusty trails of Taos to the bustling virtual thoroughfares of the internet. We relied primarily on data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), where we sought to gather information on air pollution levels and Tesla's stock price, respectively, from 2011 to 2021.

Our approach was akin to a treasure hunt, as we scoured the web for obscure datasets, innuendos, and numbers that would yield the clues necessary to untangle the perplexing relationship between air quality and stock performance. Much like Tesla's autopilot system, we automated the collection process to ensure a comprehensive dataset, leaving no byte unturned. It was a veritable digital safari, with Excel spreadsheets as our trusty steeds and pivot tables as our compass, navigating through the murky waters of internet data sources.

In a daring display of technological prowess, we meticulously cleaned and processed the collected data, harnessing the power of statistical software to wrangle with the unruly numbers, transforming them from a disorderly cacophony into a harmonious symphony of information. Our journey through the data wilderness included harmonizing disparate datasets, dueling with missing values, and engaging in tango-like maneuvers of data imputation to ensure a seamless analytical experience.

With our meticulously curated dataset in hand, we summoned the mystical powers of statistical analysis to unveil the enigmatic correlation between air pollution in Taos and the pulsating heartbeat of Tesla's stock price. We employed a range of statistical techniques that would've made even the most seasoned Wall Street analysts raise an eyebrow in amusement, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis.

To ensure the reliability of our findings, we cross-validated our results using a variety of robust statistical methods, just as a prudent investor diversifies their portfolio. The air may have been fresh in Taos, but our statistical rigor was as crisp as a freshly printed dollar bill. In the wise words of Warren Buffett, "Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing," and with our rigorous methodology, we ventured forth armed with knowledge and absurdity in equal measure.

So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt and prepare to be astounded as we unfurl the findings that emerged from this captivating carnival of data and discovery. Prevail upon your skeptical spirit and allow our whimsical methodology to guide you through the tangled underbrush of correlation and causation, as we present the delightful dance between air pollution in Taos and Tesla's stock price, all delivered with a knowing wink and a mischievous grin.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9922663, r-squared of 0.9845924, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome, esteemed researchers, stock enthusiasts, and fellow aficionados of the absurd! In this whimsical expedition through the realms of finance and environmental science, we embark on a mission to uncover the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels of Taos, New Mexico, and the stock price of the enigmatic electric vehicle juggernaut, Tesla Inc. (TSLA).
Prepare to be amused as we traverse the convoluted landscapes of Wall Street and the serene vistas of Taos, where the air is as fresh as the humor in this paper. Our findings promise to tickle your fancy and perhaps leave you scratching your head in disbelief at the improbable dance between air quality and stock market performance.
Now, take a deep breath and brace yourselves for a research journey filled with gags, jests, and the occasional pun – because why should academic papers be devoid of humor? Join us as we unravel the tantalizing tale of "Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox," where financial data meets fresh air in a rather unexpected waltz of wit and wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our study unearthed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Taos, New Mexico, and the tumultuous trajectory of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663, an r-squared of 0.9845924, and p < 0.01, we were left breathless by the strength of this unexpected link. Our findings dance on the edge of absurdity, but they are not to be sneezed at!

Figure 1 illustrates the whimsical waltz between air pollution levels in Taos and Tesla's stock price, showcasing the tight embrace of these seemingly disparate variables. The scatterplot paints a picture more intricate than a web of financial derivatives, demonstrating the uncanny connection that has left even the most seasoned stock analysts scratching their heads.

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a whimsical element to this paradox, suggesting that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by mere chance is as rare as a unicorn sighting on Wall Street.

In summary, our findings reveal a connection between the air quality in Taos, New Mexico, and Tesla's stock price that is more startling than a sudden stock market crash. This correlation unveils an unlikely narrative where the health of the environment intertwines with the vicissitudes of the stock market, leaving us pondering the capricious nature of financial performance and environmental factors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature on the correlation between air pollution and stock prices has primarily focused on urban areas with high industrial activity and dense populations. Smith et al. (2015) found a significant negative association between air quality index and stock performance in major metropolitan cities. Doe and Jones (2018) corroborated these findings, highlighting the adverse impact of air pollution on the financial markets of densely populated regions.
Turning to the realm of environmental economics, "The Economics of Air Quality" by Johnson and Smith (2009) delves into the economic consequences of air pollution, emphasizing the detrimental effects on public health and productivity. In a similar vein, "Polluted Promises: Environmental Chicanery and Commodification" by Adams (2013) offers insightful perspectives on the intersection of environmental degradation and economic ramifications, shedding light on the multifaceted implications of air pollution.
In the world of fiction, "The Air We Breathe" by A. Clear (2007) presents a dystopian narrative where corporations profit from selling clean air in a post-apocalyptic world, serving as a cautionary tale about the commodification of environmental resources. Likewise, "Emissions of Enigma" by R. Mystery (2015) offers a suspenseful portrayal of a clandestine conspiracy involving air pollution and financial markets, blurring the lines between reality and fiction.
Expanding our search into unconventional sources, the researchers encountered a peculiar trove of wisdom in the most unexpected of places – CVS receipts. Amidst the cacophony of discounts and promotions, these mundane slips of paper offered surprisingly profound insights into the whims of consumer behavior and the tangential musings of the stock market. While it remains to be seen whether the correlation between air pollution in Taos and Tesla's stock price is elucidated in the fine print of a CVS receipt, the authors cannot discount the serendipitous journey that led them to this realization.
As we navigate through the literature on air pollution and its unlikely companions, the connection between Taos' atmosphere and Tesla's stock price emerges as a whimsical enigma deserving of further exploration. While the juxtaposition of finance and fresh air may seem surreal, the forthcoming analysis aims to unravel the paradoxical relationship with a touch of levity and scholarly rigor.
Stay tuned for the delightfully absurd analysis that awaits, where we weave together the threads of air quality and stock market performance in a tapestry of whimsy and wonder.

[[RESULTS]]
Our study unearthed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Taos, New Mexico, and the tumultuous trajectory of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663, an r-squared of 0.9845924, and p < 0.01, we were left breathless by the strength of this unexpected link. Our findings dance on the edge of absurdity, but they are not to be sneezed at!
Figure 1 illustrates the whimsical waltz between air pollution levels in Taos and Tesla's stock price, showcasing the tight embrace of these seemingly disparate variables. The scatterplot paints a picture more intricate than a web of financial derivatives, demonstrating the uncanny connection that has left even the most seasoned stock analysts scratching their heads.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a whimsical element to this paradox, suggesting that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by mere chance is as rare as a unicorn sighting on Wall Street.
In summary, our findings reveal a connection between the air quality in Taos, New Mexico, and Tesla's stock price that is more startling than a sudden stock market crash. This correlation unveils an unlikely narrative where the health of the environment intertwines with the vicissitudes of the stock market, leaving us pondering the capricious nature of financial performance and environmental factors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, the whimsical waltz of data analysis has led us to a peculiar partnership indeed! In the grand ballroom of statistics, our findings have twirled and tangoed with an unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Taos, New Mexico, and the electrifying performance of Tesla's stock price (TSLA).

Who would have thought that the dusty desert air of Taos could reach all the way to Wall Street and dance the stock prices of an electric vehicle company like a marionette on a string? It seems this paradoxical pair has spun a tale as astonishing as a unicorn sighting in the stock market arena. Fueled by a correlation coefficient akin to a robust oak tree, our results have certainly left us breathless, not just from the air pollution.

Our delighted discovery aligns with previous research on the adverse impact of air pollution on stock prices in urban areas. As Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) waltzed through the concrete jungles, they unveiled a negative association between air quality index and stock performance. Similarly, our findings pirouette in tandem with these studies, revealing that even in the enchanting expanse of Taos, the ghost of air pollution can haunt the stock market.

The whimsical whispers of "The Air We Breathe" by A. Clear (2007) and the suspenseful suspense of "Emissions of Enigma" by R. Mystery (2015) seem less like fiction and more like clairvoyant predictions of our own findings. The air in Taos has potential to become as powerful and influential as any stock market rumor.

Furthermore, our study unearths a serendipitous link that aligns with the cheeky insights from CVS receipts, reminding us that the most unexpected places can offer unexpected wisdom. So, as we navigate the financial market, let us not discount the humbling hilarity of finding correlations in the most whimsical of places.

In essence, our results have tickled the ribs of stock analysts far and wide, ushering in a new era where the breezes of Taos have a whisper in the stock market's ear. The potential implications of this unexpected relationship are as boundless as a desert horizon, urging us to contemplate the unpredictable interplay between environmental factors and financial performance. The world of finance and the atmosphere of Taos may have just twirled into an unlikely pas de deux, and we eagerly await the encore of this whimsical, yet serious, tango.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico and Tesla's stock price (TSLA). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome, esteemed researchers, stock enthusiasts, and fellow aficionados of the absurd! In this whimsical expedition through the realms of finance and environmental science, we embark on a mission to uncover the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels of Taos, New Mexico, and the stock price of the enigmatic electric vehicle juggernaut, Tesla Inc. (TSLA).
Prepare to be amused as we traverse the convoluted landscapes of Wall Street and the serene vistas of Taos, where the air is as fresh as the humor in this paper. Our findings promise to tickle your fancy and perhaps leave you scratching your head in disbelief at the improbable dance between air quality and stock market performance.
Now, take a deep breath and brace yourselves for a research journey filled with gags, jests, and the occasional pun – because why should academic papers be devoid of humor? Join us as we unravel the tantalizing tale of "Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox," where financial data meets fresh air in a rather unexpected waltz of wit and wisdom.

[[RESULTS]]
Our study unearthed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Taos, New Mexico, and the tumultuous trajectory of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663, an r-squared of 0.9845924, and p < 0.01, we were left breathless by the strength of this unexpected link. Our findings dance on the edge of absurdity, but they are not to be sneezed at!
Figure 1 illustrates the whimsical waltz between air pollution levels in Taos and Tesla's stock price, showcasing the tight embrace of these seemingly disparate variables. The scatterplot paints a picture more intricate than a web of financial derivatives, demonstrating the uncanny connection that has left even the most seasoned stock analysts scratching their heads.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a whimsical element to this paradox, suggesting that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by mere chance is as rare as a unicorn sighting on Wall Street.
In summary, our findings reveal a connection between the air quality in Taos, New Mexico, and Tesla's stock price that is more startling than a sudden stock market crash. This correlation unveils an unlikely narrative where the health of the environment intertwines with the vicissitudes of the stock market, leaving us pondering the capricious nature of financial performance and environmental factors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

As we bid adieu to this whimsical waltz through the world of finance and environmental science, we are left with a breath of fresh air and a portfolio of pun-tastic revelations. Our study has unraveled the enigmatic connection between the air pollution levels in Taos, New Mexico, and Tesla's stock price, leaving us in a state of disbelief akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a financial district.

The robust correlation coefficient and p-value that is rarer than spotting a leprechaun riding a green Tesla in Taos on St. Patrick's Day have left us humbled by the intricacies of this peculiar pairing. It seems that the whims of Wall Street may be as fickle as the whims of the wind, as Tesla's stock price dances to the tune of Taos' tainted air.

As we conclude this odyssey of oddities, it is clear that no more research is needed in this area. The connection between air pollution in Taos and Tesla's stock price is as solid as a well-constructed financial model – and as unlikely as a hedge fund manager moonlighting as a stand-up comedian.

In the realm where pollution and profits collide, this paradoxical pairing has tickled our funny bones and expanded our understanding of the unpredictable forces that shape the stock market. So, let us bid farewell to this peculiar tale and venture forth to seek new frontiers of financial folly and environmental eccentricities. After all, who said academic research couldn't be a whimsical whirlwind of statistical prowess and stock market shenanigans?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Environmental Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Atmospheric Anomalies and Electric Vehicle Emissions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tesla's Tumultuous Tango with Taos' Tainted Air: TSLA and Taos Air Pollution Paradox with an abstract of This research paper delves into the whimsical world of Wall Street, where we uncover the surprising link between air pollution levels in the scenic town of Taos, New Mexico, and the rollercoaster ride of Tesla's stock price (TSLA) from 2011 to 2021. With a cunning combination of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our study unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.9922663 and p < 0.01, revealing a seemingly ludicrous connection that leaves us gasping for fresh air. Through whimsical puns and unexpected twists, we shed light on this peculiar pairing and provoke laughter as we untangle the alliance between environmental factors and financial performance. Join us in this whimsical journey through statistics and stock humor as we unravel the enigmatic relationship between air quality in Taos and Tesla's stock price.

ChatGPT:

Tesla, TSLA, Taos air pollution, Taos New Mexico, environmental pollution correlation with stock price, EPA air pollution data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, financial performance, stock market humor, statistics and stock price, Wall Street, air quality correlation with stock price

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Taos, NM
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico

Tesla's stock price (TSLA)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Tesla (TSLA) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Tesla's stock price (TSLA)

Correlation r = 0.9922663 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9845924 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Tesla's stock price (TSLA)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-9. 0.0000000018211121853480973000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 1.8E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 549,114,990 random variables You don't actually need 549 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico (Bad air quality days)00000000000.00309597
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) (Stock price)1.791.932.339.9914.8615.3814.3220.820.4128.3239.82




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00309597,])
array_2 = np.array([1.79,1.93,2.33,9.99,14.86,15.38,14.32,20.8,20.41,28.3,239.82,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Taos, New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Tesla's stock price (TSLA)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 2992 · Black Variable ID: 22261 · Red Variable ID: 1545
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0