about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,255 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Stevie and the second variable is Wind power generated in Argentina.  The chart goes from 1996 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of babies named Stevie rose, so did the collective level of excitement and enthusiasm in the world. This led to an unexpected side effect - an uptick in high-fives being given across the globe. The sudden surge in air movement in Argentina was inadvertently harnessed by wind turbines, ultimately contributing to a boost in wind power generation. Remember, every time a baby is named Stevie, a gust of renewable energy is born!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a sun-drenched plaza in Argentina with a banner proudly displaying the name "Stevie." Surrounding the banner are people joyfully twirling to the sounds of Stevie Nicks' music. In the background, wind turbines spin vigorously, harnessing the collective energy generated by the community's movements, symbolizing the increased wind power generated in Argentina due to the popularity of the name Stevie. Keep the visual depiction simple, without any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A photo-realistic image Data cyber art Voxel art Scalar art
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Stevie increased, more people started playing Stevie Nicks songs, which in turn generated a significant increase in wind power in Argentina due to the collective power of people twirling in flowy shawls to "Edge of Seventeen.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sun-drenched plaza in Argentina, the name Stevie is displayed proudly on a banner, surrounded by people joyfully twirling to the sounds of Stevie Nicks' music. In the background, wind turbines spin vigorously, harnessing the collective energy generated by the community's movements, symbolizing the increased wind power generated in Argentina due to the popularity of the name Stevie.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a sun-drenched plaza in Argentina, the name Stevie is displayed proudly on a banner, surrounded by people joyfully twirling to the sounds of Stevie Nicks' music. In the background, wind turbines spin vigorously, harnessing the collective energy generated by the community's movements, symbolizing the increased wind power generated in Argentina due to the popularity of the name Stevie. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a sun-drenched plaza in Argentina with a banner proudly displaying the name "Stevie." Surrounding the banner are people joyfully twirling to the sounds of Stevie Nicks' music. In the background, wind turbines spin vigorously, harnessing the collective energy generated by the community's movements, symbolizing the increased wind power generated in Argentina due to the popularity of the name Stevie. Keep the visual depiction simple, without any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Stevie caused Wind power generated in Argentina to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

The International Journal of Whimsical Wind Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for 1996 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

What do you get when you cross a famous first name with renewable energy statistics? No, it's not the setup for a classic dad joke, but rather the premise of our investigation. As we delve into the intersection of nomenclature and natural resources, we uncover an unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Hold onto your hats (and your data sets) as we embark on this whimsical journey!

In the world of science and research, unexpected connections often lie dormant, waiting to be unearthed like buried treasure - or, in this case, like a wind turbine cutting through the breeze. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be influenced by the popularity of the name Stevie? It's an unlikely hypothesis, but as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction. Or should we say, "steaner" than fiction?

What begins as a lighthearted exploration soon leads us to some "air-ily" serious findings. Lo and behold, our analysis reveals a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021. A statistically robust relationship indeed! It seems that the impact of a name can extend far beyond personal identity, reaching into the very currents of renewable energy production.

Amidst the hum of turbines and the swirl of data points, our study unearths a truth as undeniable as a strong gust of wind: the name Stevie is more than just a moniker – it's a force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape. Who would've thought that a name, much like the wind itself, could wield such power?

Stay tuned as we unpack the nuances of this surprising connection and shed light on the uncharted terrain where the whimsical meets the statistical. After all, in the world of academic research, we believe that every line of inquiry can benefit from a bit of "pundamental" curiosity. Keep your eyes on the horizon - the winds of change are blowing, and they're spelling out the name "Stevie."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do you get when you cross a famous first name with renewable energy statistics? No, it's not the setup for a classic dad joke, but rather the premise of our investigation. As we delve into the intersection of nomenclature and natural resources, we uncover an unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Hold onto your hats (and your data sets) as we embark on this whimsical journey!
In the world of science and research, unexpected connections often lie dormant, waiting to be unearthed like buried treasure - or, in this case, like a wind turbine cutting through the breeze. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be influenced by the popularity of the name Stevie? It's an unlikely hypothesis, but as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction. Or should we say, "steaner" than fiction?
What begins as a lighthearted exploration soon leads us to some "air-ily" serious findings. Lo and behold, our analysis reveals a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021. A statistically robust relationship indeed! It seems that the impact of a name can extend far beyond personal identity, reaching into the very currents of renewable energy production.
Amidst the hum of turbines and the swirl of data points, our study unearths a truth as undeniable as a strong gust of wind: the name Stevie is more than just a moniker – it's a force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape. Who would've thought that a name, much like the wind itself, could wield such power?
Stay tuned as we unpack the nuances of this surprising connection and shed light on the uncharted terrain where the whimsical meets the statistical. After all, in the world of academic research, we believe that every line of inquiry can benefit from a bit of "pundamental" curiosity. Keep your eyes on the horizon - the winds of change are blowing, and they're spelling out the name "Stevie."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have delved into the realm of nomenclature and its potential influence on various facets of society. Smith et al., in "A Name by Any Other Name: The Impact of Personal Identity on Environmental Variables," investigate the relationship between personal names and environmental attitudes. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "The Name Game: Exploring the Connections Between Names and Economic Indicators," explore the socioeconomic implications of first names. These serious endeavors set the stage for our investigation into the peculiar correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power generated in Argentina.

In the context of renewable energy research, it is crucial to consider unorthodox variables that may impact the energy landscape. Our study, inspired by the unconventional nature of this connection, seeks to bridge the gap between personal identity and sustainable resource utilization. As we channel our inner punster, we can't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be as influenced by the name Stevie as a finely tuned wind turbine?

Turning to more lighthearted sources, "Zephyrs and Zingers: A Whimsical Exploration of Wind Energy and Celebrity Names" by Author McPunster provides a jovial take on the potential link between famous names and renewable energy statistics. The distinctly light-hearted tone of this work offers a refreshing perspective on an otherwise sober topic. As we comically unpack the results, we realize that the influence of a name may be as far-reaching as the gusty winds of Patagonia.

Would it be surprising to learn that famous fiction works have dabbled in the theme of renewable energy, albeit indirectly? In "Gone with the Wind Power: A Novel Examination of Names and Nature's Energy," Margaret Mitchell weaves a tale of romance and resilience amidst the backdrop of the Southern wind. The titular connection may not be overt, but it serves as a whimsical reminder of the tangential relationship between names and natural forces.

Shifting gears to pop culture influences, cartoons and children's shows have not shied away from depicting wind power and catchy names. Animated favorites such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus" imparted valuable lessons on environmental conservation and sustainable energy sources, subtly reinforcing the idea that names and renewable resources may share an unexpected camaraderie.

As we wade through the literature, we find ourselves infusing our analysis with a not-so-gentle breeze of humor and wonder. Who knew that the gentle whisper of a name could echo amid the whirring blades of a wind turbine or that the pop culture references ingrained in our childhood memories would find relevance in our scholarly pursuits? Through the lens of our investigation, we aim to infuse the academic discourse with a breath of fresh air and remind ourselves that even in the pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a clever pun or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1996 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do you get when you cross a famous first name with renewable energy statistics? No, it's not the setup for a classic dad joke, but rather the premise of our investigation. As we delve into the intersection of nomenclature and natural resources, we uncover an unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Hold onto your hats (and your data sets) as we embark on this whimsical journey!
In the world of science and research, unexpected connections often lie dormant, waiting to be unearthed like buried treasure - or, in this case, like a wind turbine cutting through the breeze. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be influenced by the popularity of the name Stevie? It's an unlikely hypothesis, but as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction. Or should we say, "steaner" than fiction?
What begins as a lighthearted exploration soon leads us to some "air-ily" serious findings. Lo and behold, our analysis reveals a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021. A statistically robust relationship indeed! It seems that the impact of a name can extend far beyond personal identity, reaching into the very currents of renewable energy production.
Amidst the hum of turbines and the swirl of data points, our study unearths a truth as undeniable as a strong gust of wind: the name Stevie is more than just a moniker – it's a force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape. Who would've thought that a name, much like the wind itself, could wield such power?
Stay tuned as we unpack the nuances of this surprising connection and shed light on the uncharted terrain where the whimsical meets the statistical. After all, in the world of academic research, we believe that every line of inquiry can benefit from a bit of "pundamental" curiosity. Keep your eyes on the horizon - the winds of change are blowing, and they're spelling out the name "Stevie."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystifying connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina, our research team devised a methodology as innovative and compelling as the potential link itself. We embarked on this whimsical research journey with a sense of curiosity and a healthy dose of humor, fully embracing the spirit of scientific inquiry and discovery.

Firstly, in our quest to gather data, we combed through the archives of the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, much like intrepid treasure hunters in search of the elusive statistical "booty". After all, when it comes to "data-mining", we prefer to do it without the pickaxes and hard hats – preferring instead to rely on the computational prowess of our trusty computers.

Once our data was assembled—much like pieces of a perplexing puzzle—we set out to clean and wrangle it with the precision of a seasoned data "sherpa". We sifted through the dataset, removing any outliers and anomalies that dared to disrupt the tranquility of our statistical landscape. It's all fun and games until a mischievous data point decides to "blow" in the wrong direction.

In assessing the popularity of the name Stevie, we employed a time-series analysis to trace its ebbs and flows over the years. It was like watching the rhythmic rise and fall of ocean waves, only in this case, the waves were made of "Stevie" sightings across the vast expanse of birth registries.

Simultaneously, we delved into the wind power statistics of Argentina, harnessing the power of regression analysis to uncover patterns and trends. It's safe to say that when it comes to dissecting data, we prefer "wind"-ing paths that lead us to unexpected and enlightening discoveries.

Subsequently, we employed sophisticated statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, to tease out any potential relationship between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. It's like playing matchmaker between two seemingly unrelated variables – who knew that love, or in this case, correlation, would be in the air?

Furthermore, in our pursuit of rigor and precision, we accounted for pertinent demographic and energy production factors, ensuring that our analysis was as thorough and comprehensive as a gust front sweeping across the open countryside. It's science with a side of meticulousness – because when it comes to teasing out unexpected connections, we like to "blow away" any doubts with thoroughness.

Lastly, we garnished our analysis with robustness checks and sensitivity analyses, leaving no stone unturned in our quest to validate the surprising connection between the popularity of the name Stevie and wind power in Argentina. In the world of research, as in life, it's always wise to double-check and ensure that our findings are as resilient as a wind turbine in a storm.

Through this multifaceted approach, laden with scientific tenacity and a hint of whimsy, we aimed to shed light on the enchanting and largely unexplored relationship between the name Stevie and the renewable energy landscape of Argentina. After all, much like the winds of change, scientific inquiry is known to "blow" open new avenues of understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1996 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9614001, r-squared of 0.9242902, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
What do you get when you cross a famous first name with renewable energy statistics? No, it's not the setup for a classic dad joke, but rather the premise of our investigation. As we delve into the intersection of nomenclature and natural resources, we uncover an unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Hold onto your hats (and your data sets) as we embark on this whimsical journey!
In the world of science and research, unexpected connections often lie dormant, waiting to be unearthed like buried treasure - or, in this case, like a wind turbine cutting through the breeze. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be influenced by the popularity of the name Stevie? It's an unlikely hypothesis, but as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction. Or should we say, "steaner" than fiction?
What begins as a lighthearted exploration soon leads us to some "air-ily" serious findings. Lo and behold, our analysis reveals a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021. A statistically robust relationship indeed! It seems that the impact of a name can extend far beyond personal identity, reaching into the very currents of renewable energy production.
Amidst the hum of turbines and the swirl of data points, our study unearths a truth as undeniable as a strong gust of wind: the name Stevie is more than just a moniker – it's a force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape. Who would've thought that a name, much like the wind itself, could wield such power?
Stay tuned as we unpack the nuances of this surprising connection and shed light on the uncharted terrain where the whimsical meets the statistical. After all, in the world of academic research, we believe that every line of inquiry can benefit from a bit of "pundamental" curiosity. Keep your eyes on the horizon - the winds of change are blowing, and they're spelling out the name "Stevie."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our analysis, we found a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power generated in Argentina. The correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and r-squared of 0.9242902 for the time period from 1996 to 2021 left us windswept with astonishment! It seems that the name Stevie not only strikes a chord in music but also orchestrates a symphony of wind power in Argentina.

Now, onto the figure (Fig. 1) – imagine a scatterplot that's as tightly packed as a well-organized wind farm. The dots on the graph danced and swirled like a gust of wind, forming a clear upward trend that left us feeling anything but "air-headed." The relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and wind power generation in Argentina was unmistakable, much like a catchy tune that simply can't be ignored.

Let's not "wind" ourselves up in suspense any longer – the findings of our study are not only statistically significant but also undeniably whimsical. The robust correlation tells a tale as captivating as a gusty breeze, demonstrating that the influence of a name can extend far beyond the realm of personal identity.

We couldn't help but chuckle at the thought that the wind power landscape in Argentina might be subtly influenced by the name Stevie. It's as if each gust of wind carries a whisper of the name, propelling turbines and powering homes with a touch of musical magic. Who knew that renewable energy and nomenclature could harmonize so sweetly?

In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina has blown our expectations away – pun intended! This unexpected correlation adds a touch of whimsy to the world of academic research, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics and data analysis, there's always room for a lighthearted twist of fate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have delved into the realm of nomenclature and its potential influence on various facets of society. Smith et al., in "A Name by Any Other Name: The Impact of Personal Identity on Environmental Variables," investigate the relationship between personal names and environmental attitudes. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "The Name Game: Exploring the Connections Between Names and Economic Indicators," explore the socioeconomic implications of first names. These serious endeavors set the stage for our investigation into the peculiar correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power generated in Argentina.
In the context of renewable energy research, it is crucial to consider unorthodox variables that may impact the energy landscape. Our study, inspired by the unconventional nature of this connection, seeks to bridge the gap between personal identity and sustainable resource utilization. As we channel our inner punster, we can't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be as influenced by the name Stevie as a finely tuned wind turbine?
Turning to more lighthearted sources, "Zephyrs and Zingers: A Whimsical Exploration of Wind Energy and Celebrity Names" by Author McPunster provides a jovial take on the potential link between famous names and renewable energy statistics. The distinctly light-hearted tone of this work offers a refreshing perspective on an otherwise sober topic. As we comically unpack the results, we realize that the influence of a name may be as far-reaching as the gusty winds of Patagonia.
Would it be surprising to learn that famous fiction works have dabbled in the theme of renewable energy, albeit indirectly? In "Gone with the Wind Power: A Novel Examination of Names and Nature's Energy," Margaret Mitchell weaves a tale of romance and resilience amidst the backdrop of the Southern wind. The titular connection may not be overt, but it serves as a whimsical reminder of the tangential relationship between names and natural forces.
Shifting gears to pop culture influences, cartoons and children's shows have not shied away from depicting wind power and catchy names. Animated favorites such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus" imparted valuable lessons on environmental conservation and sustainable energy sources, subtly reinforcing the idea that names and renewable resources may share an unexpected camaraderie.
As we wade through the literature, we find ourselves infusing our analysis with a not-so-gentle breeze of humor and wonder. Who knew that the gentle whisper of a name could echo amid the whirring blades of a wind turbine or that the pop culture references ingrained in our childhood memories would find relevance in our scholarly pursuits? Through the lens of our investigation, we aim to infuse the academic discourse with a breath of fresh air and remind ourselves that even in the pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a clever pun or two.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power generated in Argentina. The correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and r-squared of 0.9242902 for the time period from 1996 to 2021 left us windswept with astonishment! It seems that the name Stevie not only strikes a chord in music but also orchestrates a symphony of wind power in Argentina.
Now, onto the figure (Fig. 1) – imagine a scatterplot that's as tightly packed as a well-organized wind farm. The dots on the graph danced and swirled like a gust of wind, forming a clear upward trend that left us feeling anything but "air-headed." The relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and wind power generation in Argentina was unmistakable, much like a catchy tune that simply can't be ignored.
Let's not "wind" ourselves up in suspense any longer – the findings of our study are not only statistically significant but also undeniably whimsical. The robust correlation tells a tale as captivating as a gusty breeze, demonstrating that the influence of a name can extend far beyond the realm of personal identity.
We couldn't help but chuckle at the thought that the wind power landscape in Argentina might be subtly influenced by the name Stevie. It's as if each gust of wind carries a whisper of the name, propelling turbines and powering homes with a touch of musical magic. Who knew that renewable energy and nomenclature could harmonize so sweetly?
In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina has blown our expectations away – pun intended! This unexpected correlation adds a touch of whimsy to the world of academic research, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics and data analysis, there's always room for a lighthearted twist of fate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The wind of revelation is upon us, or should I say, the Stevie breeze is stirring up more than just leaves. Our findings have blown away skepticism and left us "stevie"-d with wonder at the remarkable correlation we've uncovered. It seems the names we carry on our birth certificate might influence more than our vanity license plates – they might just be whistling tunes to the wind turbines of Argentina!

Our study not only aligns with previous research exploring the impact of personal names on various facets of life but blows them out of the water – much like strong wind power propelling turbines. Smith et al., in "A Name by Any Other Name: The Impact of Personal Identity on Environmental Variables," set the stage for our study by delving into the potential link between names and environmental attitudes. We took their work seriously, even if they didn't predict the name Stevie would carry so much "wind-erg y" with it! And it seems that Doe and Jones' "The Name Game: Exploring the Connections Between Names and Economic Indicators" was onto something. Who knew that economic indicators could blow in on the heels of a name?

Our research aligns with the spirit of these studies, showing that the popularity of the first name Stevie is positively correlated with wind power generated in Argentina. The unmistakable relationship, as solid as a well-constructed wind turbine, has us reflecting on the name Stevie with newfound respect – it's not just a moniker, it's a force of nature! Now, onto the jokes – did you hear the one about the statistician who predicted a windy day? He said there was a 60% chance, but he was only "blowing hot air."

Turning our attention to the scholarly sources that took a lighthearted look at renewable energy statistics, we see that McPunster's "Zephyrs and Zingers: A Whimsical Exploration of Wind Energy and Celebrity Names" wasn't just a breezy read. It seems the playful exploration of connections between famous names and renewable energy numbers wasn't far off the mark. As for Margaret Mitchell's "Gone with the Wind Power: A Novel Examination of Names and Nature's Energy," we find that our study breathes fresh air into the tangential relationship between names and natural forces. And regarding Captain Planet and the Planeteers, well, could Stevie be Captain Wind-turbine? It's a blowhard, but such an amusing thought, isn’t it?

When outlining our results, we must address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the gust in the lab? The correlation coefficient and r-squared values revealed a robust and convincing link between the popularity of the name Stevie and wind power generation in Argentina. It's not just a coincidence; it's a zephyr of truth that can't be swept under the rug. And as for the scatterplot, it was as tightly packed as a well-organized wind farm, dancing and swirling like a lively gust of wind – we laughed so hard we were left "air-headed." But our giggles don't diminish the significance of our findings. It's clear – the name Stevie is dancing to the tune of renewable energy in Argentina!

In conclusion, our investigation into the improbable connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina adds a lighthearted twist to the scholarly discourse. Our study is a testament to the unexpected camaraderie between science and whimsy, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a dad joke or two. And remember, when the wind blows, let's not forget that it's not just air – it's the whispers of Stevies-sans-guitars, making their voices heard in the most unconventional of places!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Stevie and Wind power generated in Argentina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.

As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.

Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".

In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
What do you get when you cross a famous first name with renewable energy statistics? No, it's not the setup for a classic dad joke, but rather the premise of our investigation. As we delve into the intersection of nomenclature and natural resources, we uncover an unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Hold onto your hats (and your data sets) as we embark on this whimsical journey!
In the world of science and research, unexpected connections often lie dormant, waiting to be unearthed like buried treasure - or, in this case, like a wind turbine cutting through the breeze. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but wonder: could the winds of change in Argentina be influenced by the popularity of the name Stevie? It's an unlikely hypothesis, but as the saying goes, the truth is often stranger than fiction. Or should we say, "steaner" than fiction?
What begins as a lighthearted exploration soon leads us to some "air-ily" serious findings. Lo and behold, our analysis reveals a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021. A statistically robust relationship indeed! It seems that the impact of a name can extend far beyond personal identity, reaching into the very currents of renewable energy production.
Amidst the hum of turbines and the swirl of data points, our study unearths a truth as undeniable as a strong gust of wind: the name Stevie is more than just a moniker – it's a force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape. Who would've thought that a name, much like the wind itself, could wield such power?
Stay tuned as we unpack the nuances of this surprising connection and shed light on the uncharted terrain where the whimsical meets the statistical. After all, in the world of academic research, we believe that every line of inquiry can benefit from a bit of "pundamental" curiosity. Keep your eyes on the horizon - the winds of change are blowing, and they're spelling out the name "Stevie."

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power generated in Argentina. The correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and r-squared of 0.9242902 for the time period from 1996 to 2021 left us windswept with astonishment! It seems that the name Stevie not only strikes a chord in music but also orchestrates a symphony of wind power in Argentina.
Now, onto the figure (Fig. 1) – imagine a scatterplot that's as tightly packed as a well-organized wind farm. The dots on the graph danced and swirled like a gust of wind, forming a clear upward trend that left us feeling anything but "air-headed." The relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and wind power generation in Argentina was unmistakable, much like a catchy tune that simply can't be ignored.
Let's not "wind" ourselves up in suspense any longer – the findings of our study are not only statistically significant but also undeniably whimsical. The robust correlation tells a tale as captivating as a gusty breeze, demonstrating that the influence of a name can extend far beyond the realm of personal identity.
We couldn't help but chuckle at the thought that the wind power landscape in Argentina might be subtly influenced by the name Stevie. It's as if each gust of wind carries a whisper of the name, propelling turbines and powering homes with a touch of musical magic. Who knew that renewable energy and nomenclature could harmonize so sweetly?
In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina has blown our expectations away – pun intended! This unexpected correlation adds a touch of whimsy to the world of academic research, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics and data analysis, there's always room for a lighthearted twist of fate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our study, we find ourselves blown away by the unexpected yet robust relationship between the popularity of the name Stevie and wind power generated in Argentina. It seems that the winds of change in the renewable energy sector have a melodic undertone, and it's none other than "Stevie" singing the tune! Our statistics not only sing but also offer a chorus of evidence pointing to a correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and r-squared of 0.9242902 from 1996 to 2021, leaving us feeling "stievenated" with excitement.

As we reflect on our findings, we can't help but share a dad joke: Did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was 3 feet deep, on average. Our data, however, runs deep and offers a refreshing breeze of insight into the quirky connections that lurk beneath the surface of research.

Our analysis leaves us "wind-struck" with the realization that the name Stevie can indeed sway more than just hearts and minds - it wields influence over the very currents of renewable energy. It's as if the winds of fate whispered, "Stevie, can you 'blow' me away," and the turbines responded with a resounding "yes!" The correlation, much like a well-crafted punchline, is impossible to ignore.

With a strong wind at our backs, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Our study adds a playful twist to the scholarly discourse, illustrating that even in the realm of scientific inquiry, there's always room for a bit of whimsy. So, let's allow the winds to carry this conclusion far and wide - "Stevie" is more than just a name; it's a renewable force to be reckoned with! And on that note, we bid adieu to our "Stevie-ating" exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Whimsical Wind Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Whimsical Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stevie's Stirring Stats: The Surprising Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Stevie and Wind Power in Argentina with an abstract of The study delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the popularity of the first name Stevie and the wind power generated in Argentina. Seeking to shed light on this whimsical topic, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9614001 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1996 to 2021, indicating a robust relationship.
As we embarked on this investigation, we pondered the profound question: could the name Stevie truly wield an influence on the wind energy landscape of Argentina? To our amusement, the data presented an unmistakable link. It seems fitting that a name associated with the renowned singer Stevie Nicks might have a penchant for generating "fleetwood" winds of change in the renewable energy sector.
Our remarkable findings are sure to blow you away - pun intended! Our analysis not only raises eyebrows but also raises awareness about the captivating interplay between seemingly disparate elements. With each gust of wind, we are reminded that there's more to a name than meets the "aye".
In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Stevie and wind power in Argentina calls for further inquiry and reflection. Our study adds a whimsical twist to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's always room for a bit of wit and wonder.

ChatGPT:

- Stevie name popularity
- Wind power in Argentina
- Correlation between name popularity and wind power
- Argentina renewable energy sector
- US Social Security Administration data
- Energy Information Administration data
- Influence of names on energy landscapes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Stevie
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Stevie
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Stevie

Wind power generated in Argentina
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Argentina in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Argentina

Correlation r = 0.9614001 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9242902 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Argentina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Stevie) over the 26 years from 1996 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.9E-15. 0.0000000000000059275718450313
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 5.9E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 168,703,142,896,233 random variables You don't actually need 168 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 25 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 25 because we have two variables measured over a period of 26 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Stevie (Babies born)3303183072432472362172322152112522292172402102272542603183123794444736298011147
Wind power generated in Argentina (Billion kWh)0.010.0150.0330.0350.0350.0490.0730.0780.0720.0750.070.0610.0420.0360.0250.0590.8221.0070.6190.588610.5439420.6071491.402544.94699.3182112.8105




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([330,318,307,243,247,236,217,232,215,211,252,229,217,240,210,227,254,260,318,312,379,444,473,629,801,1147,])
array_2 = np.array([0.01,0.015,0.033,0.035,0.035,0.049,0.073,0.078,0.072,0.075,0.07,0.061,0.042,0.036,0.025,0.059,0.822,1.007,0.619,0.58861,0.543942,0.607149,1.40254,4.9469,9.31821,12.8105,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Stevie"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Argentina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 3255 · Black Variable ID: 3190 · Red Variable ID: 23463
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0