about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,451 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Jarrett and the second variable is Air pollution in Flint, Michigan.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the first name Jarrett decreased, there were fewer car emissions from all the Jarretts who loved to show off by driving around in their souped-up cars. This led to a slight but noticeable improvement in air quality in Flint, Michigan.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cityscape in Flint, Michigan, with smoke billowing from backyard trash fires, and mason jars being used as drinking glasses in windows and on porches. The scene should capture the atmosphere of increased pollution and resource scarcity due to the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and the resulting demand for canning supplies. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism 3D Pixar Style Hyper-realistic Realistic Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan, in the following situation: As the name "Jarrett" gained popularity, so did the use of mason jars for drinking, leading to increased demand for canning supplies. This caused a shortage of lids, forcing residents of Flint to burn more trash, worsening air pollution.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Flint, Michigan, as the name "Jarrett" became popular, more people began using mason jars for drinking. This led to a higher demand for canning supplies and a shortage of lids. Consequently, residents started burning more trash, adding to the air pollution in the city.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Flint, Michigan, as the name "Jarrett" became popular, more people began using mason jars for drinking. This led to a higher demand for canning supplies and a shortage of lids. Consequently, residents started burning more trash, adding to the air pollution in the city. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cityscape in Flint, Michigan, with smoke billowing from backyard trash fires, and mason jars being used as drinking glasses in windows and on porches. The scene should capture the atmosphere of increased pollution and resource scarcity due to the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and the resulting demand for canning supplies.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Jarrett caused Air pollution in Flint, Michigan to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan

The Journal of Environmental Semantics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to environmental research, one might expect investigations into factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, or even cow flatulence - but how about the influence of a name? Yes, you read that right. In this peculiar study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in the peculiar city of Flint, Michigan. The idea might seem far-fetched at first, but as we aim to demonstrate, statistical analysis reveals a surprisingly robust correlation that has long eluded detection.

Let's face it - the field of environmental research is often inundated with complex models, intricate data sets, and ponderous discussions. There's a weighty seriousness that seems to permeate the literature, as if scholars are allergic to even the faintest whiff of lightheartedness. However, in the spirit of embracing intellectual curiosity in all its forms, we sought to inject a touch of levity into our exploration. After all, who says scholarly pursuits can't have a dash of whimsy?

Nevertheless, beneath the jocular facade lies a genuine and rigorous investigation into the potential relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Jarrett" and the airborne stew that wafts through the streets of Flint. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the million-dollar question: Is there any merit to the notion that the popularity of a name could be entwined with the quality of the air we breathe?

In our quest for answers, we applied the full force of statistical analysis, crunching numbers, testing hypotheses, and seeking patterns in the data dating back to 1980. The relationship we uncovered between the eponymous first name and air pollution levels is, without a doubt, eye-opening, and may just leave you scratching your head - or perhaps, your Jarrett. So, with all that said, let's peel back the layers of this unorthodox investigation and uncover an unexpected linkage that might just tickle your statistical fancy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to environmental research, one might expect investigations into factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, or even cow flatulence - but how about the influence of a name? Yes, you read that right. In this peculiar study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in the peculiar city of Flint, Michigan. The idea might seem far-fetched at first, but as we aim to demonstrate, statistical analysis reveals a surprisingly robust correlation that has long eluded detection.
Let's face it - the field of environmental research is often inundated with complex models, intricate data sets, and ponderous discussions. There's a weighty seriousness that seems to permeate the literature, as if scholars are allergic to even the faintest whiff of lightheartedness. However, in the spirit of embracing intellectual curiosity in all its forms, we sought to inject a touch of levity into our exploration. After all, who says scholarly pursuits can't have a dash of whimsy?
Nevertheless, beneath the jocular facade lies a genuine and rigorous investigation into the potential relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Jarrett" and the airborne stew that wafts through the streets of Flint. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the million-dollar question: Is there any merit to the notion that the popularity of a name could be entwined with the quality of the air we breathe?
In our quest for answers, we applied the full force of statistical analysis, crunching numbers, testing hypotheses, and seeking patterns in the data dating back to 1980. The relationship we uncovered between the eponymous first name and air pollution levels is, without a doubt, eye-opening, and may just leave you scratching your head - or perhaps, your Jarrett. So, with all that said, let's peel back the layers of this unorthodox investigation and uncover an unexpected linkage that might just tickle your statistical fancy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Impacts of Names on Environmental Phenomena," Smith delves into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its potential influence on air quality. The study offers a comprehensive analysis of various first names and their purported connections to environmental factors, including air pollution. While the focus is not specifically on the name "Jarrett," the findings serve as an intriguing backdrop for our own exploration.

Doe, in "Monikers and the Metropolis: Unraveling Urban Air Quality Quirks," takes a more localized approach, examining the relationship between first names and air pollution in specific cities. This work provides valuable insights into the potential variability of name-environment connections across different geographical locations, laying the groundwork for our investigation in the unique context of Flint, Michigan.

Jones' research, "A Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Quixotic Quiddities of Airborne Alliteration," widens the scope to consider the phonetic qualities of names and their impact on air quality. While the study doesn't directly address the name "Jarrett," its exploration of the linguistic aspects of names and their potential environmental repercussions is an enlightening piece of the puzzle.

Turning to non-fiction books, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Environmental Quality" offers a broader perspective on the factors influencing air pollution, providing a theoretical basis for our investigation. Additionally, "The Power of Names: Unraveling the Mysteries of Monikers" delves into the psychological and sociological dimensions of first names, shedding light on the potential connections between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

In the realm of fiction, "The Airborne Adventures of Jarrett and the Polluted City" presents a whimsical tale set against the backdrop of a city grappling with air pollution, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking narrative that resonates with our research theme. Similarly, "The Name Game: An Unconventional Quest for Environmental Truth" weaves a fantastical story of names and their impact on the world around us, provoking readers to contemplate the potential ramifications of nomenclature on environmental quality.

As we venture into the unexpected realms of name-based environmental exploration, we also draw inspiration from popular culture, engaging with cartoons and children's shows for fresh perspectives. Reflecting on the animated series "Airbenders and Name Labels," we are reminded of the intriguing ways in which imaginative storytelling can intertwine with real-world phenomena, reinforcing the notion that inspiration can emerge from the most unlikely sources.

As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly inquiry, we carry with us a spirit of curiosity, humor, and perhaps a touch of whimsy - attributes that infuse our research with a distinct charm and offer a delightful respite from the usual gravity of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to environmental research, one might expect investigations into factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, or even cow flatulence - but how about the influence of a name? Yes, you read that right. In this peculiar study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in the peculiar city of Flint, Michigan. The idea might seem far-fetched at first, but as we aim to demonstrate, statistical analysis reveals a surprisingly robust correlation that has long eluded detection.
Let's face it - the field of environmental research is often inundated with complex models, intricate data sets, and ponderous discussions. There's a weighty seriousness that seems to permeate the literature, as if scholars are allergic to even the faintest whiff of lightheartedness. However, in the spirit of embracing intellectual curiosity in all its forms, we sought to inject a touch of levity into our exploration. After all, who says scholarly pursuits can't have a dash of whimsy?
Nevertheless, beneath the jocular facade lies a genuine and rigorous investigation into the potential relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Jarrett" and the airborne stew that wafts through the streets of Flint. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the million-dollar question: Is there any merit to the notion that the popularity of a name could be entwined with the quality of the air we breathe?
In our quest for answers, we applied the full force of statistical analysis, crunching numbers, testing hypotheses, and seeking patterns in the data dating back to 1980. The relationship we uncovered between the eponymous first name and air pollution levels is, without a doubt, eye-opening, and may just leave you scratching your head - or perhaps, your Jarrett. So, with all that said, let's peel back the layers of this unorthodox investigation and uncover an unexpected linkage that might just tickle your statistical fancy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To pursue our investigation into the peculiar partnership between the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels, we employed a variety of data collection and analysis methods. Our first step involved gathering historical data on the popularity of the name "Jarrett" from the US Social Security Administration. This information was meticulously mined from birth records and annual reports, capturing the frequency of newborns christened with the distinctive name from 1980 to 2022.

Simultaneously, we delved into the environmental arena, where we sought out air quality data from the venerable Environmental Protection Agency. The levels of pollutants, including particulate matter, ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, were scoured from monitoring stations in the illustrious city of Flint, Michigan, over the same time span.

The alignment of these datasets allowed us to unleash the full arsenal of statistical analyses. We began with a simple correlation coefficient to discern any initial relationships between the prevalence of the moniker "Jarrett" and the inhospitable cocktail of airborne pollutants. Following this, we delved into more elaborate regression analyses, exploring potential causal pathways and teasing out the temporal nuances of this unexpected connection.

It is worth noting that our methodology deliberately incorporated a lighthearted approach to data interpretation. As we navigated through the troves of information, we conducted informal "Jarrett jokes" sessions to infuse our findings with an extra dash of mirth. While not a traditional statistical technique, this approach provided a unique lens through which to view the results, and we believe it adds an element of whimsy to the otherwise serious pursuit of knowledge.

In light of the somewhat unorthodox nature of our investigation, we also undertook a thorough review of existing literature on the intersection of nomenclature and environmental factors. Alas, this endeavor failed to yield much beyond a few pun-laden jests about "air-ritating" names and "particulate patter." Nonetheless, our penchant for levity did not waver, and we maintain that a sprinkle of humor can only enrich scholarly dialogue.

Overall, our methodology blends rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of lightheartedness, aiming to shed light on an unprecedented relationship between a name and environmental quality. The coming sections will reveal the fruits of our unconventional labor, offering a glimpse into the unexpected nexus of "Jarrett" and pollution that may just leave you pleasantly perplexed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6805168, r-squared of 0.4631031, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to environmental research, one might expect investigations into factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, or even cow flatulence - but how about the influence of a name? Yes, you read that right. In this peculiar study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in the peculiar city of Flint, Michigan. The idea might seem far-fetched at first, but as we aim to demonstrate, statistical analysis reveals a surprisingly robust correlation that has long eluded detection.
Let's face it - the field of environmental research is often inundated with complex models, intricate data sets, and ponderous discussions. There's a weighty seriousness that seems to permeate the literature, as if scholars are allergic to even the faintest whiff of lightheartedness. However, in the spirit of embracing intellectual curiosity in all its forms, we sought to inject a touch of levity into our exploration. After all, who says scholarly pursuits can't have a dash of whimsy?
Nevertheless, beneath the jocular facade lies a genuine and rigorous investigation into the potential relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Jarrett" and the airborne stew that wafts through the streets of Flint. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the million-dollar question: Is there any merit to the notion that the popularity of a name could be entwined with the quality of the air we breathe?
In our quest for answers, we applied the full force of statistical analysis, crunching numbers, testing hypotheses, and seeking patterns in the data dating back to 1980. The relationship we uncovered between the eponymous first name and air pollution levels is, without a doubt, eye-opening, and may just leave you scratching your head - or perhaps, your Jarrett. So, with all that said, let's peel back the layers of this unorthodox investigation and uncover an unexpected linkage that might just tickle your statistical fancy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and the air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, during the period from 1980 to 2022. This correlation coefficient suggests a moderately strong positive relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the calculated r-squared value of 0.4631031 indicates that approximately 46.31% of the variation in air pollution levels can be attributed to the variation in the popularity of the name "Jarrett."

Furthermore, the statistical analysis also yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a highly significant relationship between the variables. The small p-value suggests that it is highly unlikely that the observed correlation is due to random chance alone, providing substantial evidence for the existence of a true association between the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan.

Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, displaying the scatterplot of the two variables. The figure visually portrays the compelling relationship uncovered in this unorthodox investigation.

In conclusion, the results of our statistical analysis offer intriguing insights into the potential link between the prevalence of the name "Jarrett" and environmental factors in Flint, Michigan, highlighting the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated variables may be intertwined. These findings not only have scholarly implications but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the often serious domain of environmental research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impacts of Names on Environmental Phenomena," Smith delves into the intriguing world of nomenclature and its potential influence on air quality. The study offers a comprehensive analysis of various first names and their purported connections to environmental factors, including air pollution. While the focus is not specifically on the name "Jarrett," the findings serve as an intriguing backdrop for our own exploration.
Doe, in "Monikers and the Metropolis: Unraveling Urban Air Quality Quirks," takes a more localized approach, examining the relationship between first names and air pollution in specific cities. This work provides valuable insights into the potential variability of name-environment connections across different geographical locations, laying the groundwork for our investigation in the unique context of Flint, Michigan.
Jones' research, "A Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Quixotic Quiddities of Airborne Alliteration," widens the scope to consider the phonetic qualities of names and their impact on air quality. While the study doesn't directly address the name "Jarrett," its exploration of the linguistic aspects of names and their potential environmental repercussions is an enlightening piece of the puzzle.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Environmental Quality" offers a broader perspective on the factors influencing air pollution, providing a theoretical basis for our investigation. Additionally, "The Power of Names: Unraveling the Mysteries of Monikers" delves into the psychological and sociological dimensions of first names, shedding light on the potential connections between nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
In the realm of fiction, "The Airborne Adventures of Jarrett and the Polluted City" presents a whimsical tale set against the backdrop of a city grappling with air pollution, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking narrative that resonates with our research theme. Similarly, "The Name Game: An Unconventional Quest for Environmental Truth" weaves a fantastical story of names and their impact on the world around us, provoking readers to contemplate the potential ramifications of nomenclature on environmental quality.
As we venture into the unexpected realms of name-based environmental exploration, we also draw inspiration from popular culture, engaging with cartoons and children's shows for fresh perspectives. Reflecting on the animated series "Airbenders and Name Labels," we are reminded of the intriguing ways in which imaginative storytelling can intertwine with real-world phenomena, reinforcing the notion that inspiration can emerge from the most unlikely sources.
As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly inquiry, we carry with us a spirit of curiosity, humor, and perhaps a touch of whimsy - attributes that infuse our research with a distinct charm and offer a delightful respite from the usual gravity of academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and the air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, during the period from 1980 to 2022. This correlation coefficient suggests a moderately strong positive relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the calculated r-squared value of 0.4631031 indicates that approximately 46.31% of the variation in air pollution levels can be attributed to the variation in the popularity of the name "Jarrett."
Furthermore, the statistical analysis also yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a highly significant relationship between the variables. The small p-value suggests that it is highly unlikely that the observed correlation is due to random chance alone, providing substantial evidence for the existence of a true association between the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, displaying the scatterplot of the two variables. The figure visually portrays the compelling relationship uncovered in this unorthodox investigation.
In conclusion, the results of our statistical analysis offer intriguing insights into the potential link between the prevalence of the name "Jarrett" and environmental factors in Flint, Michigan, highlighting the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated variables may be intertwined. These findings not only have scholarly implications but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the often serious domain of environmental research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation provide compelling evidence supporting the existence of a connection between the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Our findings align with prior research by Smith, Doe, and Jones, who delved into the quirky realm of name-environment correlations. While these initial works may have been met with skepticism, our study consolidates and expands upon their findings, demonstrating the substantive impact of nomenclature on environmental quality. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and the p-value of less than 0.01 affirm the robustness of the Jarrett-pollution connection, validating the earlier, seemingly whimsical musings on name-related environmental influences.

When we reflect on the unexpected twists and lighthearted tone of the literature review, including the fictitious novels "The Airborne Adventures of Jarrett and the Polluted City" and "The Name Game: An Unconventional Quest for Environmental Truth," we find ourselves chuckling at how these seemingly frivolous works actually parallel our own findings. Perhaps there is something to be said about the profound wisdom embedded in the most whimsical of narratives. It appears that the correlations between names and environmental phenomena are not as far-fetched as some might assume. As researchers, we are reminded that exploration and discovery may emerge from the most unlikely, and entertaining, of sources.

The statistical analysis also presented a pleasantly surprising r-squared value of 0.4631031, indicating that approximately 46.31% of the variation in air pollution levels can be attributed to the variation in the popularity of the name "Jarrett." This finding adds a whimsical touch to the investigation, underscoring the substantial impact of a name on the environmental landscape. It seems that even in the realm of academia, a touch of humor and unexpected correlations can offer profound insights.

Our study is not without its playful inspirations, having drawn upon the unconventional wisdom embedded in cartoons and children's shows. Who would have thought that the animated series "Airbenders and Name Labels" could provide a paragon for genuine scientific inquiry? Yet, as we examine the sturdy correlation between the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, such unexpected wellsprings of inspiration warrant acknowledgment and perhaps even a good-natured chuckle.

In conclusion, our research not only validates the earlier speculations but also offers a whimsical layer to the investigation of environmental factors. As we venture through the buoyant landscape of scholarly inquiry, our findings underscore the delightful intertwining of academic rigor and the serendipitous humor infused into our exploration of the Jarrett-pollution connection. This study highlights the potential for unexpected sources of inspiration to offer genuine insights, ultimately enriching the scholarly discourse on the multifaceted influences shaping our environment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jarrett and Air pollution in Flint, Michigan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to environmental research, one might expect investigations into factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, or even cow flatulence - but how about the influence of a name? Yes, you read that right. In this peculiar study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in the peculiar city of Flint, Michigan. The idea might seem far-fetched at first, but as we aim to demonstrate, statistical analysis reveals a surprisingly robust correlation that has long eluded detection.
Let's face it - the field of environmental research is often inundated with complex models, intricate data sets, and ponderous discussions. There's a weighty seriousness that seems to permeate the literature, as if scholars are allergic to even the faintest whiff of lightheartedness. However, in the spirit of embracing intellectual curiosity in all its forms, we sought to inject a touch of levity into our exploration. After all, who says scholarly pursuits can't have a dash of whimsy?
Nevertheless, beneath the jocular facade lies a genuine and rigorous investigation into the potential relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Jarrett" and the airborne stew that wafts through the streets of Flint. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the million-dollar question: Is there any merit to the notion that the popularity of a name could be entwined with the quality of the air we breathe?
In our quest for answers, we applied the full force of statistical analysis, crunching numbers, testing hypotheses, and seeking patterns in the data dating back to 1980. The relationship we uncovered between the eponymous first name and air pollution levels is, without a doubt, eye-opening, and may just leave you scratching your head - or perhaps, your Jarrett. So, with all that said, let's peel back the layers of this unorthodox investigation and uncover an unexpected linkage that might just tickle your statistical fancy.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and the air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, during the period from 1980 to 2022. This correlation coefficient suggests a moderately strong positive relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the calculated r-squared value of 0.4631031 indicates that approximately 46.31% of the variation in air pollution levels can be attributed to the variation in the popularity of the name "Jarrett."
Furthermore, the statistical analysis also yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a highly significant relationship between the variables. The small p-value suggests that it is highly unlikely that the observed correlation is due to random chance alone, providing substantial evidence for the existence of a true association between the popularity of the name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, displaying the scatterplot of the two variables. The figure visually portrays the compelling relationship uncovered in this unorthodox investigation.
In conclusion, the results of our statistical analysis offer intriguing insights into the potential link between the prevalence of the name "Jarrett" and environmental factors in Flint, Michigan, highlighting the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated variables may be intertwined. These findings not only have scholarly implications but also infuse a touch of whimsy into the often serious domain of environmental research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the enigmatic association between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan, has uncovered a remarkably robust correlation that transcends conventional expectations. The correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and the r-squared value of 0.4631031 attest to the intriguing possibility of a meaningful connection between nomenclature and environmental quality. This unorthodox discovery not only piques academic interest but also injects a refreshing dose of levity into the often somber realm of environmental research.

Our findings prompt us to ponder whether the air in Flint carries hints of "Jarrett" in its composition, much like an aromatic essence wafting through the city streets. The statistical evidence compellingly suggests that, indeed, the tale of "Jarrett" may be inscribed in the very air we breathe. Additionally, the small p-value of less than 0.01 speaks volumes, alluding to a relationship that defies the capricious whims of chance, and beckoning us to delve deeper into the whimsical world of name-environment dynamics.

As we conclude this elucidating exploration, we are reminded that scholarly pursuits, much like life itself, can benefit from an occasional dash of the unexpected and the inexplicable. So, as we bid adieu to our curious inquiry, we invite fellow academics to embrace the peculiar, the eccentric, and the unconventional in their scholarly endeavors. After all, who knows what other whimsical adventures await in the seemingly mundane corridors of research?

In light of these groundbreaking insights, we can confidently assert that no further research into the Jarrett-pollution connection in Flint, Michigan is necessary. The evidence at hand stands as a testament to the tantalizing possibilities that emerge when statistical inquiry intersects with the curious realm of human nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Semantics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Humor and Research Integration (SEHRI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Quality and the Name Game: Exploring the Jarrett-Pollution Connection in Flint, Michigan with an abstract of This study delves into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Jarrett" and air pollution levels in Flint, Michigan. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team aimed to unravel the potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Employing statistical analysis, we detected a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6805168 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2022. Our findings not only illustrate the Jarrett-pollution connection but also offer a lighthearted perspective on the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental quality. This study adds a whimsical twist to the investigation of environmental factors, demonstrating that even in academia, a touch of humor can enrich scholarly pursuits.

ChatGPT:

"Jarrett name popularity," "air pollution levels in Flint Michigan," "correlation between name popularity and air pollution," "US Social Security Administration data," "Environmental Protection Agency air quality data," "statistical analysis of correlation coefficient," "impact of name on environmental quality"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Jarrett
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jarrett
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jarrett

Air pollution in Flint, Michigan
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Flint, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Flint, Michigan

Correlation r = 0.6805168 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4631031 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 46.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Flint, Michigan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jarrett) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.1E-7. 0.0000005149730579563927000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.68 in 5.1E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,941,849 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.81 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Jarrett (Babies born)395487450440424490539554539637609570495601562559642889101996210108207046164643983453232332251761842001421931661291411081331108480
Air pollution in Flint, Michigan (Bad air quality days)5.688624.9586810.03468.679248.45073.139014.641357.0796514.91235.93227.9831913.08023.755871.877936.190486.22018.571436.1611415.458912.0693.6885211.392410.970582.0057310.54852.057616.250.8264460.8298761.239673.305798.677690.4201680.8797650.8403362.4725300.82872900.2732240.8219180.549451




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([395,487,450,440,424,490,539,554,539,637,609,570,495,601,562,559,642,889,1019,962,1010,820,704,616,464,398,345,323,233,225,176,184,200,142,193,166,129,141,108,133,110,84,80,])
array_2 = np.array([5.68862,4.95868,10.0346,8.67924,8.4507,3.13901,4.64135,7.07965,14.9123,5.9322,7.98319,13.0802,3.75587,1.87793,6.19048,6.2201,8.57143,6.16114,15.4589,12.069,3.68852,11.3924,10.9705,8,2.00573,10.5485,2.05761,6.25,0.826446,0.829876,1.23967,3.30579,8.67769,0.420168,0.879765,0.840336,2.47253,0,0.828729,0,0.273224,0.821918,0.549451,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jarrett"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Flint, Michigan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 3451 · Black Variable ID: 2743 · Red Variable ID: 20631
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0