about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,659 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with Apple.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the soybeans grew heartier thanks to genetic modification, farmers in North Dakota found themselves with more free time. With their soybeans needing less attention, they had the opportunity to switch from soy to joy - that's right, they started growing apples! The abundance of apple orchards led to an increase in the availability of delicious, crisp apples. This meant that North Dakotans were experiencing peak apple satisfaction, which somehow translated to higher customer satisfaction with Apple products. It's as if the saying became "An apple a day keeps the complaints away!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: The fields of North Dakota are lined with endless rows of vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. The soybeans, referred to as "Soyboys," are depicted as futuristic, pixelated crops emitting a subtle glow amidst the verdant landscape. In the foreground, contented North Dakotans are enjoying their Apple products, seamlessly integrated into the scene. A sense of technological harmony permeates the image, with the soybean plants and Apple devices symbolizing a high-tech coexistence, radiating a soothing, futuristic ambiance. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cutsy graphics Realistic Parallax art
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple, in the following situation: As GMO use increased in soybeans, they also found their way into the diets of North Dakotans. These genetically modified "Soyboys" became super satisfied, leading to a ripple effect of positivity, including increased satisfaction with Apple products. Turns out, a soybean a day keeps the Apple complaints away!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The fields of North Dakota are filled with endless rows of lush, green soybean plants. Among them, the genetically modified "Soyboys" are thriving, glistening under the bright sun. As the locals incorporate more of these GMO soybeans into their diets, there is a noticeable increase in contentment and joy on their faces. Smiling North Dakotans are seen happily enjoying their Apple products, from iPhones to MacBooks, radiating with satisfaction as they embrace the positive effects of the soybeans in their lives.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: The fields of North Dakota are filled with endless rows of lush, green soybean plants. Among them, the genetically modified "Soyboys" are thriving, glistening under the bright sun. As the locals incorporate more of these GMO soybeans into their diets, there is a noticeable increase in contentment and joy on their faces. Smiling North Dakotans are seen happily enjoying their Apple products, from iPhones to MacBooks, radiating with satisfaction as they embrace the positive effects of the soybeans in their lives. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: The fields of North Dakota are lined with endless rows of vibrant, genetically modified soybean plants. The soybeans, referred to as "Soyboys," are depicted as futuristic, pixelated crops emitting a subtle glow amidst the verdant landscape. In the foreground, contented North Dakotans are enjoying their Apple products, seamlessly integrated into the scene. A sense of technological harmony permeates the image, with the soybean plants and Apple devices symbolizing a high-tech coexistence, radiating a soothing, futuristic ambiance.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota caused Customer satisfaction with Apple to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products

Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Consumer Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The modern world is teeming with complexities that often elude the common observer, and it is the duty of the scientific community to unearth these intricate connections. In this vein, our research seeks to unveil an unexpected relationship between two seemingly disconnected domains: the utilization of genetically modified soybeans in the fields of North Dakota and the satisfaction levels of consumers with Apple products. While on the surface, these two realms may appear as distant as the poles of a magnet, our study delves into the unexplored corridors of these domains to discern any potential magnetic pull they may exert on one another.

The notion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has, for a considerable time, sparked impassioned debates in the agricultural panorama. The controversy has sown seeds of discord among stakeholders, from farmers tending to the verdant landscapes to policymakers navigating the labyrinth of regulations. Meanwhile, the technological juggernaut that is Apple Inc. has etched its mark on the global stage, wielding products that have become an integral part of daily life for millions worldwide. The intrigue lies in understanding how the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of North Dakota may have an inconspicuous hand in shaping the sentiments of consumers toward these iconic electronic marvels.

Through a rigorous empirical inquiry, we aim to disentangle the strands of this connection and bring it to the forefront of academic discourse. While our exploration may appear to traverse through unfamiliar terrain, we trust that the findings will shed light on a facet of the consumer market that has remained veiled in obscurity. As our investigation unfolds, we implore the scholarly community to join us in unveiling the enigmatic soy-apple connection, for within this web of interdependencies may lie a cornucopia of insights waiting to be harvested.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The modern world is teeming with complexities that often elude the common observer, and it is the duty of the scientific community to unearth these intricate connections. In this vein, our research seeks to unveil an unexpected relationship between two seemingly disconnected domains: the utilization of genetically modified soybeans in the fields of North Dakota and the satisfaction levels of consumers with Apple products. While on the surface, these two realms may appear as distant as the poles of a magnet, our study delves into the unexplored corridors of these domains to discern any potential magnetic pull they may exert on one another.
The notion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has, for a considerable time, sparked impassioned debates in the agricultural panorama. The controversy has sown seeds of discord among stakeholders, from farmers tending to the verdant landscapes to policymakers navigating the labyrinth of regulations. Meanwhile, the technological juggernaut that is Apple Inc. has etched its mark on the global stage, wielding products that have become an integral part of daily life for millions worldwide. The intrigue lies in understanding how the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of North Dakota may have an inconspicuous hand in shaping the sentiments of consumers toward these iconic electronic marvels.
Through a rigorous empirical inquiry, we aim to disentangle the strands of this connection and bring it to the forefront of academic discourse. While our exploration may appear to traverse through unfamiliar terrain, we trust that the findings will shed light on a facet of the consumer market that has remained veiled in obscurity. As our investigation unfolds, we implore the scholarly community to join us in unveiling the enigmatic soy-apple connection, for within this web of interdependencies may lie a cornucopia of insights waiting to be harvested.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious intersection of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) and consumer satisfaction with Apple Inc. products has garnered limited attention in the scholarly literature. A review of existing research offers a starting point in comprehending the unanticipated relationship between these two disparate spheres. Smith and Doe (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the environmental and economic impacts of GMO soybean production in the plains of North Dakota, delving into the complexities of agricultural practices and their ramifications. Their work lays the groundwork for our investigation into the unexplored connections between soybean cultivation and consumer preferences for technology products.

Jones (2019) further contributes to the discourse with an exploration of consumer behavior in the digital age, focusing on the factors influencing brand loyalty and customer satisfaction in the tech industry. This study, while not explicitly addressing soybeans, provides valuable insights into the intricate web of influencers that shape consumer sentiment toward electronic gadgets. Furthermore, the intersection of agriculture and technology is subtly hinted at in "A Tale of Two Farms" by Charles Dickens, a work of fiction that draws parallels between the contrasting landscapes of rural fields and urban innovation, seeding a metaphorical foundation for our inquiry.

The perennial debates surrounding GMOs are also illuminated in "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, who masterfully navigates the convoluted terrain of modern food production and its impact on consumer choices. While Pollan's work may not directly pertain to soybeans in North Dakota or Apple products, the underlying themes of consumer preferences and agricultural methods resonate with the perplexing connection we seek to explore. Additionally, the popular board game "Agricola" offers a playful simulation of farming life, providing a lighthearted backdrop for contemplating the interactions between agricultural practices and consumer behavior.

As we venture into the uncharted waters of the soy-apple connection, the literature reviewed offers intriguing tidbits and subtle hints that beckon us to unravel the enigmatic web that entwines soybeans and Apple products. The unexpected juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous domains stokes the flames of curiosity and sparks a jovial, albeit scholarly, journey into the whimsical world of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The modern world is teeming with complexities that often elude the common observer, and it is the duty of the scientific community to unearth these intricate connections. In this vein, our research seeks to unveil an unexpected relationship between two seemingly disconnected domains: the utilization of genetically modified soybeans in the fields of North Dakota and the satisfaction levels of consumers with Apple products. While on the surface, these two realms may appear as distant as the poles of a magnet, our study delves into the unexplored corridors of these domains to discern any potential magnetic pull they may exert on one another.
The notion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has, for a considerable time, sparked impassioned debates in the agricultural panorama. The controversy has sown seeds of discord among stakeholders, from farmers tending to the verdant landscapes to policymakers navigating the labyrinth of regulations. Meanwhile, the technological juggernaut that is Apple Inc. has etched its mark on the global stage, wielding products that have become an integral part of daily life for millions worldwide. The intrigue lies in understanding how the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of North Dakota may have an inconspicuous hand in shaping the sentiments of consumers toward these iconic electronic marvels.
Through a rigorous empirical inquiry, we aim to disentangle the strands of this connection and bring it to the forefront of academic discourse. While our exploration may appear to traverse through unfamiliar terrain, we trust that the findings will shed light on a facet of the consumer market that has remained veiled in obscurity. As our investigation unfolds, we implore the scholarly community to join us in unveiling the enigmatic soy-apple connection, for within this web of interdependencies may lie a cornucopia of insights waiting to be harvested.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study encapsulates a multifaceted approach to disentangling the enigmatic web underlying the purported connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Leveraging a combination of data retrieval, statistical analysis, and data visualization techniques, our research team endeavored to rigorously probe this ostensible anomaly.

Data Collection:
The primary source of agricultural data for genetically modified soybean cultivation in North Dakota was obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service, encompassing data spanning the years 2000 to 2021. This comprehensive dataset allowed for a nuanced examination of the utilization of genetically modified soybeans, capturing fluctuations in cultivation patterns and area coverage across the years.

Furthermore, the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) provided invaluable consumer satisfaction ratings for Apple products over the same time span. These ratings were gleaned from diverse sources, including online customer reviews, product surveys, and market research reports, ensuring a broad and inclusive representation of consumer sentiment towards Apple products.

Data Preprocessing:
The harvested datasets underwent meticulous preprocessing to ensure uniformity and accuracy. Null values and outliers were methodically handled, outliers were collected into a neighboring data set for an "outlier research project" which went nowhere – talk about wanting to be part of the gang – and researchers who wouldn't just go quietly to the atypical value bin. Additionally, temporal alignment was meticulously executed to synchronize the agricultural and consumer satisfaction data, ensuring a coherent and synchronized examination of the soy-apple dyad.

Statistical Analysis:
The analysis commenced with an exploration of descriptive statistics to gauge the central tendencies and dispersion of the datasets. Measures such as mean, median, variance, and standard deviation elucidated the inherent characteristics of the data, providing a preliminary glimpse into the nature of the variables under scrutiny.

Following this, a robust correlation analysis was conducted to probe the relationship between the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to establish the strength and direction of the relationship, unveiling a surprising coefficient of 0.8208485, indicating a notably strong association between the two seemingly disparate entities. The computed p-value of less than 0.01 served as a testament to the statistical significance of this unearthed connection, prompting an air of incredulity among the research team as we marveled at the serendipitous revelation.

Data Visualization:
To convey the intricate findings in a palpable manner, graphical representations were crafted to elucidate the observed interplay between genetically modified soybean cultivation and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Bar charts and line graphs were meticulously designed to visually narrate the temporal evolution of soybean cultivation and consumer satisfaction, yielding captivating visual insights into the purported soy-apple nexus.

In summary, the adopted research methodology encapsulates a judicious amalgamation of data retrieval, stringent preprocessing, and advanced statistical analyses, culminating in a nuanced exploration of the unforeseen relationship between genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and consumer satisfaction with Apple products. The revealed correlation serves as a testament to the notion that in the labyrinth of modern society, even the most improbable pairings may hold a clandestine bond, awaiting discovery by inquisitive minds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8208485, r-squared of 0.6737922, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The modern world is teeming with complexities that often elude the common observer, and it is the duty of the scientific community to unearth these intricate connections. In this vein, our research seeks to unveil an unexpected relationship between two seemingly disconnected domains: the utilization of genetically modified soybeans in the fields of North Dakota and the satisfaction levels of consumers with Apple products. While on the surface, these two realms may appear as distant as the poles of a magnet, our study delves into the unexplored corridors of these domains to discern any potential magnetic pull they may exert on one another.
The notion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has, for a considerable time, sparked impassioned debates in the agricultural panorama. The controversy has sown seeds of discord among stakeholders, from farmers tending to the verdant landscapes to policymakers navigating the labyrinth of regulations. Meanwhile, the technological juggernaut that is Apple Inc. has etched its mark on the global stage, wielding products that have become an integral part of daily life for millions worldwide. The intrigue lies in understanding how the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of North Dakota may have an inconspicuous hand in shaping the sentiments of consumers toward these iconic electronic marvels.
Through a rigorous empirical inquiry, we aim to disentangle the strands of this connection and bring it to the forefront of academic discourse. While our exploration may appear to traverse through unfamiliar terrain, we trust that the findings will shed light on a facet of the consumer market that has remained veiled in obscurity. As our investigation unfolds, we implore the scholarly community to join us in unveiling the enigmatic soy-apple connection, for within this web of interdependencies may lie a cornucopia of insights waiting to be harvested.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**[[RESULTS]]**

From our thorough analysis, we found a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 indicates a substantial positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.6737922, signifying that approximately 67.4% of the variability in customer satisfaction with Apple products can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in North Dakota. The statistical significance of this relationship is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, providing robust evidence to support our findings.

The compelling nature of this correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong positive association between the use of genetically modified soybeans and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The plot showcases a striking trend, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of the connection between these two variables.

These results prompt contemplation of the intricate ways in which agricultural practices and consumer preferences may intertwine. While it may seem like comparing apples and oranges at first glance, our findings underscore the potential linkage between a staple of agribusiness and a technological giant. This unforeseen nexus between GMO soybeans and consumer sentiment toward Apple products presents an intriguing frontier for interdisciplinary research and cultivates fertile ground for further inquiry into the covert influences that operate within the consumer market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious intersection of genetically modified soybeans (GMOs) and consumer satisfaction with Apple Inc. products has garnered limited attention in the scholarly literature. A review of existing research offers a starting point in comprehending the unanticipated relationship between these two disparate spheres. Smith and Doe (2017) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the environmental and economic impacts of GMO soybean production in the plains of North Dakota, delving into the complexities of agricultural practices and their ramifications. Their work lays the groundwork for our investigation into the unexplored connections between soybean cultivation and consumer preferences for technology products.
Jones (2019) further contributes to the discourse with an exploration of consumer behavior in the digital age, focusing on the factors influencing brand loyalty and customer satisfaction in the tech industry. This study, while not explicitly addressing soybeans, provides valuable insights into the intricate web of influencers that shape consumer sentiment toward electronic gadgets. Furthermore, the intersection of agriculture and technology is subtly hinted at in "A Tale of Two Farms" by Charles Dickens, a work of fiction that draws parallels between the contrasting landscapes of rural fields and urban innovation, seeding a metaphorical foundation for our inquiry.
The perennial debates surrounding GMOs are also illuminated in "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, who masterfully navigates the convoluted terrain of modern food production and its impact on consumer choices. While Pollan's work may not directly pertain to soybeans in North Dakota or Apple products, the underlying themes of consumer preferences and agricultural methods resonate with the perplexing connection we seek to explore. Additionally, the popular board game "Agricola" offers a playful simulation of farming life, providing a lighthearted backdrop for contemplating the interactions between agricultural practices and consumer behavior.
As we venture into the uncharted waters of the soy-apple connection, the literature reviewed offers intriguing tidbits and subtle hints that beckon us to unravel the enigmatic web that entwines soybeans and Apple products. The unexpected juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous domains stokes the flames of curiosity and sparks a jovial, albeit scholarly, journey into the whimsical world of interdisciplinary research.

[[RESULTS]]
From our thorough analysis, we found a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 indicates a substantial positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.6737922, signifying that approximately 67.4% of the variability in customer satisfaction with Apple products can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in North Dakota. The statistical significance of this relationship is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, providing robust evidence to support our findings.
The compelling nature of this correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong positive association between the use of genetically modified soybeans and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The plot showcases a striking trend, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of the connection between these two variables.
These results prompt contemplation of the intricate ways in which agricultural practices and consumer preferences may intertwine. While it may seem like comparing apples and oranges at first glance, our findings underscore the potential linkage between a staple of agribusiness and a technological giant. This unforeseen nexus between GMO soybeans and consumer sentiment toward Apple products presents an intriguing frontier for interdisciplinary research and cultivates fertile ground for further inquiry into the covert influences that operate within the consumer market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust statistical evidence uncovered in this study provides compelling support for the previously unexplored connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Our findings not only substantiate the conjectures put forth in the existing literature but also shed light on the enigmatic interplay between agricultural practices and consumer preferences.

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, reflects a strong positive relationship between GMO soybean cultivation and customer satisfaction with Apple products. These results align with the insights of Smith and Doe (2017), who delved into the complex environmental and economic impacts of GMO soybean production. While the whimsical notion of soybeans influencing consumer attitudes toward technology products may at first seem as outlandish as a broccoli-flavored smartphone, our study corroborates the presence of a tangible association, inviting further investigation into this unexpected connection.

Furthermore, Jones (2019) provided valuable insights into consumer behavior in the tech industry, offering a lens through which to interpret our findings. The unanticipated nexus between soybeans and Apple products, akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure map in a haystack, illustrates the intricate web of influencers that shape consumer sentiment in the digital age. The tangential references to agricultural and technological juxtapositions in "A Tale of Two Farms" by Charles Dickens and the metaphorical resonance with modern food production in "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan highlight the subtle undercurrents that beckon us to unravel the interwoven tapestry of agricultural and technological influences on consumer preferences.

The statistically robust nature of our findings, akin to unearthing a diamond in the rough, underscores the potential significance of the soy-apple connection. The r-squared value of 0.6737922 indicates that approximately 67.4% of the variability in customer satisfaction with Apple products can be attributed to the use of GMO soybeans in North Dakota. This unexpectedly strong influence of soybean cultivation on consumer attitudes, akin to discovering a soy-based superglue for customer loyalties, prompts contemplation of the intricate ways in which agricultural practices may leave an indelible imprint on consumer sentiments toward technology products.

In conclusion, our study not only affirms the presence of a substantial correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products but also ignites the flames of curiosity, akin to finding a mysterious message in a bottle, prompting further exploration of the hidden connections that traverse the domains of agriculture and technology. As we pave the way for future research in this captivating realm, we endeavor to unravel the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection, shedding light on the surreptitious influences that underpin the complex tapestry of consumer preferences.

Note: I have crafted the discussion section incorporating the subtle humor and puns requested, interweaving them with the serious academic tone. If you require any further amendments or additional content, feel free to let me know!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota and Customer satisfaction with Apple. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The modern world is teeming with complexities that often elude the common observer, and it is the duty of the scientific community to unearth these intricate connections. In this vein, our research seeks to unveil an unexpected relationship between two seemingly disconnected domains: the utilization of genetically modified soybeans in the fields of North Dakota and the satisfaction levels of consumers with Apple products. While on the surface, these two realms may appear as distant as the poles of a magnet, our study delves into the unexplored corridors of these domains to discern any potential magnetic pull they may exert on one another.
The notion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has, for a considerable time, sparked impassioned debates in the agricultural panorama. The controversy has sown seeds of discord among stakeholders, from farmers tending to the verdant landscapes to policymakers navigating the labyrinth of regulations. Meanwhile, the technological juggernaut that is Apple Inc. has etched its mark on the global stage, wielding products that have become an integral part of daily life for millions worldwide. The intrigue lies in understanding how the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans in the heartlands of North Dakota may have an inconspicuous hand in shaping the sentiments of consumers toward these iconic electronic marvels.
Through a rigorous empirical inquiry, we aim to disentangle the strands of this connection and bring it to the forefront of academic discourse. While our exploration may appear to traverse through unfamiliar terrain, we trust that the findings will shed light on a facet of the consumer market that has remained veiled in obscurity. As our investigation unfolds, we implore the scholarly community to join us in unveiling the enigmatic soy-apple connection, for within this web of interdependencies may lie a cornucopia of insights waiting to be harvested.

[[RESULTS]]
From our thorough analysis, we found a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 indicates a substantial positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.6737922, signifying that approximately 67.4% of the variability in customer satisfaction with Apple products can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in North Dakota. The statistical significance of this relationship is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, providing robust evidence to support our findings.
The compelling nature of this correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong positive association between the use of genetically modified soybeans and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The plot showcases a striking trend, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of the connection between these two variables.
These results prompt contemplation of the intricate ways in which agricultural practices and consumer preferences may intertwine. While it may seem like comparing apples and oranges at first glance, our findings underscore the potential linkage between a staple of agribusiness and a technological giant. This unforeseen nexus between GMO soybeans and consumer sentiment toward Apple products presents an intriguing frontier for interdisciplinary research and cultivates fertile ground for further inquiry into the covert influences that operate within the consumer market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. The statistically significant relationship we have identified serves as a poignant reminder of the interconnected nature of seemingly disparate realms. The robust quantitative analysis presented in this research underscores the potential impact of agricultural practices on consumer preferences, shedding light on the subtle but influential forces at play in the consumer market.

The implications of these findings extend beyond the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry, offering a refreshing perspective on the intricate interplay between agriculture and technology. The robustness of the correlation coefficient, coupled with the visually striking scatterplot, leaves little room for skepticism regarding the strength of the soy-apple connection. While some may dismiss this revelation as mere happenstance, we urge the scholarly community to consider the gravity of the hidden strands that bind these domains together.

However, let us not tread so far into the realm of conjecture that we lose sight of the empirical rigidity that underpins our findings. While the allure of an unexpected association between soybeans and smartphones may evoke whimsical ponderings, we must ground our interpretations in the bedrock of empirical evidence.

In light of the findings presented, we advocate for a closer examination of the intricate relationships that underpin consumer behavior. Furthermore, our study prompts opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration to explore the broader implications of these unexpected connections. As we draw the curtains on this inquiry, we implore future researchers to continue unraveling the enigmatic web of influences that shape consumer preferences.

In closing, it is our fervent belief that this study has sparked a new wave of curiosity in the unlikeliest of connections. With that said, we assert that no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Consumer Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Agriculture and Consumer Preference


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Soy-Apple Connection: Genetically Modified Soybeans and Customer Satisfaction with Apple Products with an abstract of In an effort to shed light on the seemingly unrelated realms of agricultural biotechnology and consumer electronics, this study examines the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in North Dakota and customer satisfaction with Apple products. Utilizing USDA data on GMO soybean cultivation in North Dakota and American Customer Satisfaction Index data for Apple products, we employed a robust quantitative analysis to uncover potential hidden connections. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.8208485 with a strikingly low p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2000 to 2021. The implications of these unexpected results and their potential ramifications on both agribusiness and the technology sector prompt new avenues for interdisciplinary research and evoke contemplation of the webs that link agricultural practices to consumer preferences. We present our findings with the hope of igniting discussion on the surreptitious relationships that may underlie seemingly disparate domains, urging further investigation into the curious intricacies of the soy-apple connection.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified soybeans, North Dakota, customer satisfaction, Apple products, USDA data, American Customer Satisfaction Index, correlation analysis, agribusiness, technology sector, interdisciplinary research, agricultural practices, consumer preferences, soy-apple connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in North Dakota that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota

Customer satisfaction with Apple
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with Apple

Correlation r = 0.8208485 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6737922 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with Apple) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.9E-6. 0.0000028678509764613150000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00029% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 348,693 random variables You don't actually need 348 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota (GMO soybeans %)22496174828990929494949498949694959595959493
Customer satisfaction with Apple (Consumer Satisfaction)75737377818183798584868786878484848383838282




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([22,49,61,74,82,89,90,92,94,94,94,94,98,94,96,94,95,95,95,95,94,93,])
array_2 = np.array([75,73,73,77,81,81,83,79,85,84,86,87,86,87,84,84,84,83,83,83,82,82,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with Apple"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3659 · Black Variable ID: 839 · Red Variable ID: 19869
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0