about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,708 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Camille and the second variable is The number of archivists in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Every time someone named Camille introduces themselves, a mysterious urge to meticulously catalog historical documents and artifacts inexplicably sweeps through Louisiana. It's as if the name itself carries with it the echoing whispers of ancient filing systems, beckoning forth a new wave of archivists to ensure that the state's history remains neatly organized and easily accessible. Who knew that the key to unlocking a passion for archival work lay hidden within the seemingly innocent sounds of "Camille"? Or perhaps there's a secret society of Camilles, dedicated to spreading their archival influence across the land. It's a puzzling and strangely specific connection, but one thing's for sure: Louisiana's archivist community seems to have a curiously name-driven recruitment strategy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a visual inspired by a Discovery magazine cover image that depicts a bustling school playground in a Louisiana town. Show children playing and interacting, with a focus on the many girls named Camille. The scene should convey the inspiration drawn from the famous archivist Camille Davenport, and the subsequent surge in aspiring archivists in Louisiana. The image should exude joy, curiosity, and a sense of community, with a theme that ties the past to the present in a heartwarming manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Low poly A Discovery magazine cover image Charcoal
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Camille increased, more parents were inspired to name their daughters after the famous archivist Camille Davenport, leading to a surge in young girls growing up to pursue careers in archiving, particularly in Louisiana.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Louisiana town, a school playground is filled with children playing, and many of the girls are named Camille, inspired by the famous archivist Camille Davenport. Fast forward a few years, and the local archives are bustling with young archivists, as the popularity of the name Camille has led to a surge in aspiring archivists in Louisiana.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a Louisiana town, a school playground is filled with children playing, and many of the girls are named Camille, inspired by the famous archivist Camille Davenport. Fast forward a few years, and the local archives are bustling with young archivists, as the popularity of the name Camille has led to a surge in aspiring archivists in Louisiana. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a visual inspired by a Discovery magazine cover image that depicts a bustling school playground in a Louisiana town. Show children playing and interacting, with a focus on the many girls named Camille. The scene should convey the inspiration drawn from the famous archivist Camille Davenport, and the subsequent surge in aspiring archivists in Louisiana. The image should exude joy, curiosity, and a sense of community, with a theme that ties the past to the present in a heartwarming manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Camille positively influenced The number of archivists in Louisiana.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

The Journal of Name Nomenclature and Archival Analysis

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7766822 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intersection of nomenclature trends and labor market dynamics has long been a subject of intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. The idea that a person's name could have any meaningful impact on their professional prospects may seem far-fetched, but as we delve into the peculiar realm of statistical analysis, we are often met with surprising and unconventional revelations. In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey through the data, as we explore the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists employed in the charming state of Louisiana.

The allure of whimsical correlations never ceases to captivate the curious minds of researchers, and the curious case of Camille and archivists is no exception. As we venture into this uncharted territory, we are compelled to consider the whimsy and wonder that lie at the heart of this seemingly implausible association. From the peaks and valleys of name popularity to the fluctuations in archivist employment, the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is unexpected.

Our investigation, buoyed by robust statistical analysis and a hint of whimsy, aims to illuminate the enigmatic connection between personal appellations and professional pursuits. While we embark on this journey with a spirit of academic rigor, we also embrace the delightful prospect of uncovering correlations that may defy conventional wisdom and spark a touch of amusement.

Join us as we unravel the archival adventures of Camille – a statistical examination that not only offers valuable insights into labor market trends but also adds a dash of quirkiness to the scholarly discourse. Let's delve into the data and see where the whims of nomenclature lead us in the realm of professional pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of nomenclature trends and labor market dynamics has long been a subject of intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. The idea that a person's name could have any meaningful impact on their professional prospects may seem far-fetched, but as we delve into the peculiar realm of statistical analysis, we are often met with surprising and unconventional revelations. In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey through the data, as we explore the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists employed in the charming state of Louisiana.
The allure of whimsical correlations never ceases to captivate the curious minds of researchers, and the curious case of Camille and archivists is no exception. As we venture into this uncharted territory, we are compelled to consider the whimsy and wonder that lie at the heart of this seemingly implausible association. From the peaks and valleys of name popularity to the fluctuations in archivist employment, the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our investigation, buoyed by robust statistical analysis and a hint of whimsy, aims to illuminate the enigmatic connection between personal appellations and professional pursuits. While we embark on this journey with a spirit of academic rigor, we also embrace the delightful prospect of uncovering correlations that may defy conventional wisdom and spark a touch of amusement.
Join us as we unravel the archival adventures of Camille – a statistical examination that not only offers valuable insights into labor market trends but also adds a dash of quirkiness to the scholarly discourse. Let's delve into the data and see where the whims of nomenclature lead us in the realm of professional pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the popularity of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana has been the subject of considerable academic inquiry. The existing literature presents a range of perspectives, from the purely statistical to the delightfully whimsical. Smith (2010) delved into the demographic trends of baby names and their potential impact on career trajectories, offering intriguing insights into the subtle yet influential nuances of nomenclature dynamics. Meanwhile, Doe (2015) examined employment patterns in the archival sector, providing a solid foundation for understanding the labor market forces at play.

Jones (2018) took a more lighthearted approach, exploring the cultural significance of names and their correlation with occupational choices. These foundational studies laid the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the name "Camille" and archivist employment in Louisiana.

Turning to related non-fiction literature, "The Name Game: A Statistical Odyssey of Social Significance" by Johnson and Smithson (2013) provides a comprehensive overview of the societal implications of naming trends, drawing parallels between personal appellations and professional trajectories. In a similar vein, "Archives and Anomalies: Unconventional Trends in Historical Records" by White (2017) offers a nuanced perspective on the whimsical factors that influence archival endeavors in diverse geographical contexts.

Shifting gears to the realm of fiction, literary works such as "The Archivist's Apprentice" by Rodriguez (2008) and "Naming Destiny" by Harper (2015) offer imaginative narratives that intertwine the allure of names with the enigmatic world of archiving. While these fictional accounts may not offer empirical evidence, they contribute to the broader cultural fascination with the interplay of nomenclature and professional pursuits.

In exploring popular culture for insights, "Archives Almanac" and "The Name Files" are examples of the numerous TV shows that showcase the intricacies of archival work, providing a delightful blend of entertainment and informational content. The authors find that these programs offer a whimsical yet informative backdrop for contemplating the unconventional correlations between name trends and occupational landscapes.

As we venture into the archival adventures of Camille, we are reminded of the multifaceted nature of statistical inquiry, where the serious and the lighthearted converge to shed light on the whimsical dynamics of names and careers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of nomenclature trends and labor market dynamics has long been a subject of intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. The idea that a person's name could have any meaningful impact on their professional prospects may seem far-fetched, but as we delve into the peculiar realm of statistical analysis, we are often met with surprising and unconventional revelations. In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey through the data, as we explore the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists employed in the charming state of Louisiana.
The allure of whimsical correlations never ceases to captivate the curious minds of researchers, and the curious case of Camille and archivists is no exception. As we venture into this uncharted territory, we are compelled to consider the whimsy and wonder that lie at the heart of this seemingly implausible association. From the peaks and valleys of name popularity to the fluctuations in archivist employment, the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our investigation, buoyed by robust statistical analysis and a hint of whimsy, aims to illuminate the enigmatic connection between personal appellations and professional pursuits. While we embark on this journey with a spirit of academic rigor, we also embrace the delightful prospect of uncovering correlations that may defy conventional wisdom and spark a touch of amusement.
Join us as we unravel the archival adventures of Camille – a statistical examination that not only offers valuable insights into labor market trends but also adds a dash of quirkiness to the scholarly discourse. Let's delve into the data and see where the whims of nomenclature lead us in the realm of professional pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection and Preprocessing:
The first step in our archival adventure involved scouring the vast expanse of the internet to gather data on the popularity of the first name "Camille" and the employment statistics of archivists in Louisiana. Our primary sources of data were the US Social Security Administration, which provided comprehensive records of baby names and their frequency, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we obtained detailed employment figures for archivists in Louisiana. As we combed through this treasure trove of information, we diligently extracted data spanning the years 2004 to 2022, ensuring a robust and expansive timeframe for our analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
To unravel the curious correlation between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists in Louisiana, we employed a series of statistical methods that were as precise as they were whimsical. Firstly, we calculated the frequency of the name "Camille" over the chosen time period, taking into account its fluctuations and peculiarities. Simultaneously, we meticulously analyzed the annual employment data for archivists in Louisiana, noting any intriguing trends or patterns that emerged.

Our statistical journey then led us to the coveted realm of correlation analysis, where we examined the relationship between the popularity of the name "Camille" and the employment levels of archivists. Through rigorous calculations and mathematical marvels, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, signifying a remarkably strong association between these variables. Furthermore, our investigative exploits revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, solidifying the statistical significance of our findings and cementing the allure of this curious correlation.

To ensure the robustness of our analysis, we ventured into the realm of time series analysis, mapping out the ebbs and flows of both name popularity and archivist employment to capture the nuanced dynamics of this whimsical relationship. Our statistical odyssey culminated in a comprehensive understanding of the delightful interplay between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, painting a vivid picture of the archival adventures of Camille in the charming state of Louisiana.

Limitations and Contemplations:
As we set sail on this statistical escapade, we remained cognizant of the inherent limitations in our study. While our findings unearthed a compelling correlation between the name "Camille" and archivist employment, we recognize that correlation does not imply causation. The whimsical nature of this relationship begs the question: what other delightful correlations await discovery in the realm of personal appellations and professional pursuits? Our exploration has laid the groundwork for further research that delves deeper into the playful intricacies of nomenclature trends and their impact on the labor market.

As we conclude our methodological exposition, we embolden future researchers to seize the whimsy that permeates the realm of statistical analysis, for within the labyrinth of data lies a tapestry of correlations waiting to be unraveled. Our methodology, peppered with precision and infused with a touch of whimsy, offers a fresh perspective on the captivating interplay between name popularity and professional pursuits. Join us in the pursuit of unraveling statistical curiosities and embracing the enchanting allure of data-driven discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7766822, r-squared of 0.6032352, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of nomenclature trends and labor market dynamics has long been a subject of intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. The idea that a person's name could have any meaningful impact on their professional prospects may seem far-fetched, but as we delve into the peculiar realm of statistical analysis, we are often met with surprising and unconventional revelations. In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey through the data, as we explore the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists employed in the charming state of Louisiana.
The allure of whimsical correlations never ceases to captivate the curious minds of researchers, and the curious case of Camille and archivists is no exception. As we venture into this uncharted territory, we are compelled to consider the whimsy and wonder that lie at the heart of this seemingly implausible association. From the peaks and valleys of name popularity to the fluctuations in archivist employment, the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our investigation, buoyed by robust statistical analysis and a hint of whimsy, aims to illuminate the enigmatic connection between personal appellations and professional pursuits. While we embark on this journey with a spirit of academic rigor, we also embrace the delightful prospect of uncovering correlations that may defy conventional wisdom and spark a touch of amusement.
Join us as we unravel the archival adventures of Camille – a statistical examination that not only offers valuable insights into labor market trends but also adds a dash of quirkiness to the scholarly discourse. Let's delve into the data and see where the whims of nomenclature lead us in the realm of professional pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our comprehensive analysis of the presence of the first name "Camille" and the employment figures for archivists in the state of Louisiana from 2004 to 2022, we uncovered a curious and noteworthy correlation. The correlation coefficient between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists was determined to be 0.7766822, signifying a strong positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6032352 suggests that approximately 60.3% of the variation in archivist employment can be explained by the prevalence of the name "Camille."

Our findings are particularly robust, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of the correlation. This reinforces the notion that the observed relationship between the popularity of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists in Louisiana is not merely a whimsical coincidence but a noteworthy trend worthy of consideration.

Our corresponding figure (Fig. 1) encapsulates the essence of our findings with a visually compelling scatterplot, illustrating the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of archivists in Louisiana over the study period. The plot serves as a testament to the unexpected yet undeniable connection that we have uncovered.

The implications of these findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths. Is there something inherently archival about the name "Camille"? Could the presence of individuals bearing this name have a subtle yet tangible impact on the demand for archivists in Louisiana? While these inquiries may appear fanciful on the surface, our statistically significant results encourage further exploration into the interplay between personal names and professional landscapes.

In essence, our study sheds light on a correlation that adds a touch of whimsy to the otherwise serious realm of labor market analysis. The archival adventures of Camille, as revealed through our examination, not only provide empirical insights but also infuse the academic discourse with an element of lighthearted curiosity. As we delve deeper into the whimsical wonders of statistical correlations, the potential impacts of personal appellations on professional pursuits emerge as a captivating topic for scholarly contemplation, proving that even in the world of labor market trends, statistical analyses can have a sense of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana has been the subject of considerable academic inquiry. The existing literature presents a range of perspectives, from the purely statistical to the delightfully whimsical. Smith (2010) delved into the demographic trends of baby names and their potential impact on career trajectories, offering intriguing insights into the subtle yet influential nuances of nomenclature dynamics. Meanwhile, Doe (2015) examined employment patterns in the archival sector, providing a solid foundation for understanding the labor market forces at play.
Jones (2018) took a more lighthearted approach, exploring the cultural significance of names and their correlation with occupational choices. These foundational studies laid the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the name "Camille" and archivist employment in Louisiana.
Turning to related non-fiction literature, "The Name Game: A Statistical Odyssey of Social Significance" by Johnson and Smithson (2013) provides a comprehensive overview of the societal implications of naming trends, drawing parallels between personal appellations and professional trajectories. In a similar vein, "Archives and Anomalies: Unconventional Trends in Historical Records" by White (2017) offers a nuanced perspective on the whimsical factors that influence archival endeavors in diverse geographical contexts.
Shifting gears to the realm of fiction, literary works such as "The Archivist's Apprentice" by Rodriguez (2008) and "Naming Destiny" by Harper (2015) offer imaginative narratives that intertwine the allure of names with the enigmatic world of archiving. While these fictional accounts may not offer empirical evidence, they contribute to the broader cultural fascination with the interplay of nomenclature and professional pursuits.
In exploring popular culture for insights, "Archives Almanac" and "The Name Files" are examples of the numerous TV shows that showcase the intricacies of archival work, providing a delightful blend of entertainment and informational content. The authors find that these programs offer a whimsical yet informative backdrop for contemplating the unconventional correlations between name trends and occupational landscapes.
As we venture into the archival adventures of Camille, we are reminded of the multifaceted nature of statistical inquiry, where the serious and the lighthearted converge to shed light on the whimsical dynamics of names and careers.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our comprehensive analysis of the presence of the first name "Camille" and the employment figures for archivists in the state of Louisiana from 2004 to 2022, we uncovered a curious and noteworthy correlation. The correlation coefficient between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists was determined to be 0.7766822, signifying a strong positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6032352 suggests that approximately 60.3% of the variation in archivist employment can be explained by the prevalence of the name "Camille."
Our findings are particularly robust, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of the correlation. This reinforces the notion that the observed relationship between the popularity of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists in Louisiana is not merely a whimsical coincidence but a noteworthy trend worthy of consideration.
Our corresponding figure (Fig. 1) encapsulates the essence of our findings with a visually compelling scatterplot, illustrating the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of archivists in Louisiana over the study period. The plot serves as a testament to the unexpected yet undeniable connection that we have uncovered.
The implications of these findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths. Is there something inherently archival about the name "Camille"? Could the presence of individuals bearing this name have a subtle yet tangible impact on the demand for archivists in Louisiana? While these inquiries may appear fanciful on the surface, our statistically significant results encourage further exploration into the interplay between personal names and professional landscapes.
In essence, our study sheds light on a correlation that adds a touch of whimsy to the otherwise serious realm of labor market analysis. The archival adventures of Camille, as revealed through our examination, not only provide empirical insights but also infuse the academic discourse with an element of lighthearted curiosity. As we delve deeper into the whimsical wonders of statistical correlations, the potential impacts of personal appellations on professional pursuits emerge as a captivating topic for scholarly contemplation, proving that even in the world of labor market trends, statistical analyses can have a sense of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust findings of our study have provided compelling evidence of a significant correlation between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists in Louisiana. These results not only support, but also extend the prior research in this peculiar field at the intersection of nomenclature dynamics and labor market forces.

Our analysis echoes the sentiments put forth by Jones (2018) who highlighted the cultural significance of names and their correlation with occupational choices. The strong positive association between the popularity of the name "Camille" and the employment figures for archivists bolsters the argument for a potential influence of names on career paths. It seems that the archival adventures of Camille go beyond mere coincidence - there may be an underlying whimsical force at play, shaping the demand for archivists in Louisiana.

Additionally, our findings align with the statistical insights offered by "The Name Game: A Statistical Odyssey of Social Significance" by Johnson and Smithson (2013), which outlined the societal implications of naming trends. The statistical strength of the correlation coefficient and its significant p-value underscore the serious underpinnings of the relationship between nomenclature and professional landscapes, adding empirical weight to the lighthearted fascination with the impact of names on careers.

Furthermore, our results also resonate with the whimsical literature in the form of "Archives and Anomalies: Unconventional Trends in Historical Records" by White (2017). The unexpected yet undeniable correlation we have uncovered serves as a testament to the unconventional factors that influence archival endeavors, infusing the academic discourse with an element of lighthearted curiosity, as previously suggested by the author.

In essence, our study not only contributes to the empirical foundation of the connection between the name "Camille" and archivist employment in Louisiana, but also adds a touch of whimsy to the otherwise serious realm of labor market analysis. Our findings prompt further contemplation of the potential impacts of personal appellations on professional pursuits, reinforcing the notion that statistical analyses can indeed have a sense of humor. As we continue to unravel the mysterious allure of name trends and career trajectories, the archival adventures of Camille stand as a testament to the captivating and delightfully unexpected dynamics that underlie statistical correlations in the realm of labor market trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Camille and The number of archivists in Louisiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.

As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of nomenclature trends and labor market dynamics has long been a subject of intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. The idea that a person's name could have any meaningful impact on their professional prospects may seem far-fetched, but as we delve into the peculiar realm of statistical analysis, we are often met with surprising and unconventional revelations. In this study, we embark on an unconventional journey through the data, as we explore the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists employed in the charming state of Louisiana.
The allure of whimsical correlations never ceases to captivate the curious minds of researchers, and the curious case of Camille and archivists is no exception. As we venture into this uncharted territory, we are compelled to consider the whimsy and wonder that lie at the heart of this seemingly implausible association. From the peaks and valleys of name popularity to the fluctuations in archivist employment, the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Our investigation, buoyed by robust statistical analysis and a hint of whimsy, aims to illuminate the enigmatic connection between personal appellations and professional pursuits. While we embark on this journey with a spirit of academic rigor, we also embrace the delightful prospect of uncovering correlations that may defy conventional wisdom and spark a touch of amusement.
Join us as we unravel the archival adventures of Camille – a statistical examination that not only offers valuable insights into labor market trends but also adds a dash of quirkiness to the scholarly discourse. Let's delve into the data and see where the whims of nomenclature lead us in the realm of professional pursuits.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our comprehensive analysis of the presence of the first name "Camille" and the employment figures for archivists in the state of Louisiana from 2004 to 2022, we uncovered a curious and noteworthy correlation. The correlation coefficient between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists was determined to be 0.7766822, signifying a strong positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6032352 suggests that approximately 60.3% of the variation in archivist employment can be explained by the prevalence of the name "Camille."
Our findings are particularly robust, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of the correlation. This reinforces the notion that the observed relationship between the popularity of the name "Camille" and the number of employed archivists in Louisiana is not merely a whimsical coincidence but a noteworthy trend worthy of consideration.
Our corresponding figure (Fig. 1) encapsulates the essence of our findings with a visually compelling scatterplot, illustrating the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of archivists in Louisiana over the study period. The plot serves as a testament to the unexpected yet undeniable connection that we have uncovered.
The implications of these findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of nomenclature on career paths. Is there something inherently archival about the name "Camille"? Could the presence of individuals bearing this name have a subtle yet tangible impact on the demand for archivists in Louisiana? While these inquiries may appear fanciful on the surface, our statistically significant results encourage further exploration into the interplay between personal names and professional landscapes.
In essence, our study sheds light on a correlation that adds a touch of whimsy to the otherwise serious realm of labor market analysis. The archival adventures of Camille, as revealed through our examination, not only provide empirical insights but also infuse the academic discourse with an element of lighthearted curiosity. As we delve deeper into the whimsical wonders of statistical correlations, the potential impacts of personal appellations on professional pursuits emerge as a captivating topic for scholarly contemplation, proving that even in the world of labor market trends, statistical analyses can have a sense of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study uncovers a striking correlation between the prevalence of the name "Camille" and the number of archivists in Louisiana, demonstrating a statistically significant relationship that defies conventional expectations. While it may seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, the robustness of our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7766822 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaves little room for doubt.

The archival adventures of Camille have led us down a path of whimsy and wonder, challenging preconceived notions about the influence of nomenclature on professional pursuits. Our findings beckon us to contemplate the intriguing prospect of a name carrying subtle yet perceptible implications for employment trends. Who would have thought that a moniker could hold such archival allure?

As we ponder the implications of our research, one cannot help but muse over the countless "Camilles" who may unwittingly shape the demand for archivists in Louisiana. Could there be an inherent archiving inclination encoded within this name, or is it merely a delightful coincidence? The answers remain elusive, yet the statistical evidence refuses to be ignored.

This unexpected correlation not only adds a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse but also underscores the boundless potential for surprising insights within the realm of statistical analysis. It serves as a playful reminder that even the most serious of academic endeavors can harbor a sense of humor, much like finding a hidden treasure within the labyrinth of data.

In light of these compelling findings, we confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. With the archival adventures of Camille immortalized in our statistical analyses, we bid adieu to this captivating correlation, knowing that its lighthearted resonance will continue to echo through the annals of scholarly inquiry. After all, in the world of statistics, sometimes the most improbable connections yield the most delightful revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Name Nomenclature and Archival Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Committee for Cultural Cartography and Chronicle Studies (CCCS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Filing Fame: The Archival Adventures of Camille - A Statistical Examination of Name Popularity and Archivist Employment in Louisiana with an abstract of This paper delves into the fascinating world of name popularity and its relationship with employment trends in the archival sector. Through an analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we explore the curious correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Camille" and the number of archivists in the state of Louisiana. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7766822, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 2004 to 2022.
As we uncover the intriguing connection between the rise and fall of "Camille" as a popular name choice and the employment landscape for archivists in Louisiana, we also contemplate the potential impact of such whimsical correlations. This study sheds light on the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dynamics between nomenclature trends and labor market fluctuations, offering a fresh perspective on the intersection of personal appellations and professional pursuits.

ChatGPT:

name popularity, archival sector employment, Louisiana, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, "Camille" as a name, labor market fluctuations, nomenclature trends, professional pursuits

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Camille
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Camille
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Camille

The number of archivists in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of archivists in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of archivists in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.7766822 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6032352 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of archivists in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Camille) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.2E-5. 0.0000919611591549327700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.0092% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,874 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Camille (Babies born)1277113910771123110811611221132513421334129313071306126912881274117211351291
The number of archivists in Louisiana (Archivists)7060404040405070100110100100807050504030120




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1277,1139,1077,1123,1108,1161,1221,1325,1342,1334,1293,1307,1306,1269,1288,1274,1172,1135,1291,])
array_2 = np.array([70,60,40,40,40,40,50,70,100,110,100,100,80,70,50,50,40,30,120,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Camille"
array_2_name = "The number of archivists in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3708 · Black Variable ID: 2559 · Red Variable ID: 17091
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0