about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,736 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Solar power generated in United States and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.  The chart goes from 1984 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the amount of solar power in the US rose, so did the temperature of the asphalt, leading to an influx of melted roads. This caused unforeseen stress on Mercedes-Benz vehicles, leading to the need for more recalls. It seems the sunny side up approach to renewable energy has put Mercedes in a bit of a tight spot.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie] Generate an image of a sun-soaked highway rolling across a picturesque landscape, lined with vibrant, colorful solar panels that sparkle in the warm sunlight. A fleet of sleek Mercedes-Benz convertibles is parked on the side of the road, surrounded by a team of animated workers inspecting and repairing them. The scene should capture the comforting harmony between the natural surroundings and the advanced technology, infusing the setting with a sense of wonder and excitement. The iconic Pixar style should be evident in the whimsical yet lifelike portrayal of the vehicles and characters, evoking a sense of lightheartedness and adventure. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Cubism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Charcoal a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, in the following situation: Because the increase in solar power generated in the United States has led to more people enjoying sunny road trips, there has been a higher demand for convertible cars. Mercedes-Benz USA struggled with the sudden surge in demand for their convertibles, causing issues with supply chain and quality control, ultimately leading to an increase in automotive recalls.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: On a long stretch of sun-kissed highway in the United States, convertible cars roll down the road, powered by the abundant solar energy harnessed by countless solar panels lining the landscape. However, amidst this picturesque scene, a fleet of Mercedes-Benz convertibles is parked on the side of the road, surrounded by workers inspecting and repairing them. The increase in solar power has led to a surge in demand for convertibles, causing supply chain issues for Mercedes-Benz USA and resulting in a rise in automotive recalls.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: On a long stretch of sun-kissed highway in the United States, convertible cars roll down the road, powered by the abundant solar energy harnessed by countless solar panels lining the landscape. However, amidst this picturesque scene, a fleet of Mercedes-Benz convertibles is parked on the side of the road, surrounded by workers inspecting and repairing them. The increase in solar power has led to a surge in demand for convertibles, causing supply chain issues for Mercedes-Benz USA and resulting in a rise in automotive recalls. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie] Generate an image of a sun-soaked highway rolling across a picturesque landscape, lined with vibrant, colorful solar panels that sparkle in the warm sunlight. A fleet of sleek Mercedes-Benz convertibles is parked on the side of the road, surrounded by a team of animated workers inspecting and repairing them. The scene should capture the comforting harmony between the natural surroundings and the advanced technology, infusing the setting with a sense of wonder and excitement. The iconic Pixar style should be evident in the whimsical yet lifelike portrayal of the vehicles and characters, evoking a sense of lightheartedness and adventure.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Solar power generated in United States caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Renewable Energy and Automotive Engineering

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and p < 0.01 for 1984 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the world steers towards renewable energy sources, the skies have cleared for solar power to shine. Much like a dad joke at a family gathering, solar energy has a way of illuminating the room. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has motored along, with its fair share of twists, turns, and wrenches thrown into the mix. Our research aims to untangle the synergistic relationship between the solar power generated in the United States and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, bringing some light-hearted humor to the intersection of sunshine and setbacks.

The juxtaposition of solar power and automotive recalls might seem as unlikely as a solar-powered car in Seattle, but as statistics have shown, unexpected correlations often emerge, much like a parallel finding after multiple hypothesis tests. Embracing the spirit of discovery, we set out to explore this unusual pairing with the vigor of a researcher uncovering buried treasure in the data mine.

It is often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the case of our findings, the connection between these two variables is stronger than the bond between a bolt and a nut. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9683360, suggesting a closer relationship than that between an engine and its motor oil. This statistically significant association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, catches the eye like a shiny new car in a showroom. It seems that just as the sun's rays power solar panels, they may also exert an influence on the wheels and recalls of Mercedes-Benz vehicles.

Join us as we delve into the high-octane world of statistical analysis, solar power, and automotive recalls, traversing the road less traveled by research and embracing the unexpected detours with the charm of a witty plot twist in a scientific thriller. In the following sections, we present our methodology, results, and discussion, inviting readers to buckle up and enjoy the ride as we navigate this peculiar junction of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world steers towards renewable energy sources, the skies have cleared for solar power to shine. Much like a dad joke at a family gathering, solar energy has a way of illuminating the room. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has motored along, with its fair share of twists, turns, and wrenches thrown into the mix. Our research aims to untangle the synergistic relationship between the solar power generated in the United States and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, bringing some light-hearted humor to the intersection of sunshine and setbacks.
The juxtaposition of solar power and automotive recalls might seem as unlikely as a solar-powered car in Seattle, but as statistics have shown, unexpected correlations often emerge, much like a parallel finding after multiple hypothesis tests. Embracing the spirit of discovery, we set out to explore this unusual pairing with the vigor of a researcher uncovering buried treasure in the data mine.
It is often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the case of our findings, the connection between these two variables is stronger than the bond between a bolt and a nut. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9683360, suggesting a closer relationship than that between an engine and its motor oil. This statistically significant association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, catches the eye like a shiny new car in a showroom. It seems that just as the sun's rays power solar panels, they may also exert an influence on the wheels and recalls of Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
Join us as we delve into the high-octane world of statistical analysis, solar power, and automotive recalls, traversing the road less traveled by research and embracing the unexpected detours with the charm of a witty plot twist in a scientific thriller. In the following sections, we present our methodology, results, and discussion, inviting readers to buckle up and enjoy the ride as we navigate this peculiar junction of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between solar power generation in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA has been a surprisingly underexplored topic in academic literature. However, recent investigations have shed some light on this intriguing relationship, much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a video game.

In "Smith and Doe's Study on Renewable Energy and Automotive Recalls," the authors find a preliminary positive association between solar power generation and automotive recalls. As the solar panels harness the sun's energy, it appears that there may be an unintended consequence on the horsepower of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, much like how a solar-powered car left out in the rain may face a "recharge" of a different kind.

Building upon this foundation, "Jones et al.'s Analysis of Solar Energy Trends and Automotive Defects" delves deeper into the temporal patterns of solar power generation and automotive recalls. The authors reveal an intriguing temporal correlation that fluctuates with the changing seasons, much like how a convertible's top may go up and down with the weather. This unearths the potential influence of sunshine on the internal mechanisms of the vehicles, akin to how a sunny day may coax out the unexpected noises in a car's engine.

Shifting gears, let us take a moment to consider some non-fiction books that have contributed valuable insights to the intersection of solar power and automotive mishaps. "The Solar Economy: Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Global Future" by Hermann Scheer unravels the potential of solar energy while shedding light on its broader impact, not unlike how a bright idea can lead to unforeseen consequences. Similarly, "Car Trouble: A Novel" by Robert Rorke imaginatively intertwines the world of automotive recalls and personal tribulations, reminiscent of the curious connection we are exploring.

On a lighter note, let us not forget the fictional realm and its speculative contributions to our understanding of solar power and automotive follies. "Sunshine" by Robin McKinley and "Speed Racer" by Tatsuo Yoshida offer imaginative narratives that, while not directly related to our research, remind us of the diverse ways in which the topics at hand can intersect, much like an unexpected detour on a road trip.

Moving from the printed page to the silver screen, the movie "The Electric Car" offers an intriguing portrayal of the potential future of automotive technology, incorporating elements of solar power and electric vehicles. Delving into pop culture, the film "The Italian Job" provides an entertaining exploration of automotive capers, which, while tangential to our research, never fails to rev our engines with its thrilling heists and high-speed pursuits.

While the connection between solar power generation and automotive recalls may seem as improbable as a solar-powered flashlight, our research sets out to illuminate this unexplored territory with the enthusiasm of a pun-loving academic at happy hour. Join us as we navigate this unconventional terrain, exploring the unexpected twists and turns with the flair of a well-delivered dad joke at a scientific symposium.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1984 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the world steers towards renewable energy sources, the skies have cleared for solar power to shine. Much like a dad joke at a family gathering, solar energy has a way of illuminating the room. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has motored along, with its fair share of twists, turns, and wrenches thrown into the mix. Our research aims to untangle the synergistic relationship between the solar power generated in the United States and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, bringing some light-hearted humor to the intersection of sunshine and setbacks.
The juxtaposition of solar power and automotive recalls might seem as unlikely as a solar-powered car in Seattle, but as statistics have shown, unexpected correlations often emerge, much like a parallel finding after multiple hypothesis tests. Embracing the spirit of discovery, we set out to explore this unusual pairing with the vigor of a researcher uncovering buried treasure in the data mine.
It is often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the case of our findings, the connection between these two variables is stronger than the bond between a bolt and a nut. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9683360, suggesting a closer relationship than that between an engine and its motor oil. This statistically significant association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, catches the eye like a shiny new car in a showroom. It seems that just as the sun's rays power solar panels, they may also exert an influence on the wheels and recalls of Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
Join us as we delve into the high-octane world of statistical analysis, solar power, and automotive recalls, traversing the road less traveled by research and embracing the unexpected detours with the charm of a witty plot twist in a scientific thriller. In the following sections, we present our methodology, results, and discussion, inviting readers to buckle up and enjoy the ride as we navigate this peculiar junction of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between solar power and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, our research team employed a methodological approach that combined the precision of a well-tuned German automobile with the audacity of a solar-powered speedster. Our data sources resembled a lively contest of "Where's Waldo?", as we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, with the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation emerging as the main stages for our data collection marathon.

Our study period, spanning the years from 1984 to 2021, allowed us to capture a panoramic view of solar power generation and automotive recall activities, much like a time-lapse capturing the evolution of these two variables over the years. We meticulously extracted data points related to photovoltaic output and Mercedes-Benz USA recall announcements, ensuring that our dataset was as carefully assembled as a complex jigsaw puzzle – no missing pieces in this scientific game of meticulous deduction.

As with any intricate statistical odyssey, we encountered our fair share of statistical monsters and uncertainties along the way. However, armed with the mighty sword of robust regression analysis and the shield of multivariate analysis, we navigated through the labyrinth of data with the determination of a heavy-duty electric vehicle conquering a rugged terrain. Our methods were as rigorous as a fitness instructor, ensuring that each step of the process adhered to the principles of sound statistical analysis, akin to crossing the T's and dotting the I's in a compelling mystery novel.

We then committed ourselves to a thorough examination of the relationship between solar power generation and automotive recalls, employing correlation analysis as our compass for navigating the complex terrain of interwoven data. Our statistical arsenal included powerful software like SPSS and R, wielding them with the expertise of a seasoned conductor leading a harmonious symphony of data analysis. We applied advanced techniques, treating the data with as much care as a vintage sports car, to ensure that our results were robust and resistant to spurious correlations.

Moreover, to complement our quantitative analyses, we engaged in qualitative investigations, exploring potential mechanisms and underlying drivers behind the observed patterns. We delved into the literature with the fervor of a detective on a relentless pursuit of clues, summoning theories and prior research findings into the frame as if they were star witnesses in a legal thriller. This comprehensive approach allowed us to construct a richer narrative of the solar power and Stuttgart setbacks saga, akin to unraveling the layers of an intricate tapestry woven by the hands of fate itself.

Amidst the cacophony of statistical tools and methodological maneuvers, we remain mindful of the inherent limitations and potential sources of bias in our study. Nevertheless, armed with meticulous data curation, robust analyses, and an unyielding appetite for discovery, we stride forth, prepared to unveil the compelling findings of our investigation. Our methodology stands as a testament to the fusion of scientific rigor and unwavering curiosity, much like the meeting of photons on a solar panel and the components of a finely crafted automobile – an unlikely pairing that yields unexpected insights.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1984 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9683360, r-squared of 0.9376746, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the world steers towards renewable energy sources, the skies have cleared for solar power to shine. Much like a dad joke at a family gathering, solar energy has a way of illuminating the room. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has motored along, with its fair share of twists, turns, and wrenches thrown into the mix. Our research aims to untangle the synergistic relationship between the solar power generated in the United States and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, bringing some light-hearted humor to the intersection of sunshine and setbacks.
The juxtaposition of solar power and automotive recalls might seem as unlikely as a solar-powered car in Seattle, but as statistics have shown, unexpected correlations often emerge, much like a parallel finding after multiple hypothesis tests. Embracing the spirit of discovery, we set out to explore this unusual pairing with the vigor of a researcher uncovering buried treasure in the data mine.
It is often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the case of our findings, the connection between these two variables is stronger than the bond between a bolt and a nut. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9683360, suggesting a closer relationship than that between an engine and its motor oil. This statistically significant association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, catches the eye like a shiny new car in a showroom. It seems that just as the sun's rays power solar panels, they may also exert an influence on the wheels and recalls of Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
Join us as we delve into the high-octane world of statistical analysis, solar power, and automotive recalls, traversing the road less traveled by research and embracing the unexpected detours with the charm of a witty plot twist in a scientific thriller. In the following sections, we present our methodology, results, and discussion, inviting readers to buckle up and enjoy the ride as we navigate this peculiar junction of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis unveiled an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. This strong positive relationship is as striking as a lightning bolt hitting a sunflower field. It seems that as solar energy basks in its glory, Mercedes-Benz vehicles face an increased likelihood of encountering automotive hiccups, creating a real "solar flare" of automotive setbacks.

The r-squared value of 0.9376746 further illuminates the extent of this connection, akin to a bright headlight piercing through a foggy statistical landscape. This high r-squared value indicates that approximately 93.77% of the variability in automotive recalls can be explained by the variability in solar power generation. It's almost as if the sun itself is leaving its mark on the automotive industry, much like a playful signature on a vital research finding.

The statistical significance of the relationship is undeniable, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding is as rare as a solar eclipse and as momentous as a groundbreaking discovery in the world of statistics. One may say that this association shines as brightly as the midday sun, highlighting the intriguing interplay between solar power and automotive recalls.

The strong correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, where a scatterplot exhibits the tightly clustered points, resembling the tight alignment of solar panels on a sunny day. The figure accentuates the robust association between solar power and automotive recalls, as conspicuous as a gleaming sports car on a showroom floor.

This compelling linkage challenges our understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and automotive performance, suggesting that the sun's influence extends beyond solar panels and into the domain of automotive engineering and recalls.

It seems that this research has truly "driven" home the point that while solar power may energize our homes, it also impacts the automotive realm in unexpected ways. We invite readers to join us in embracing the "sun"derful revelations uncovered by this study and to bask in the light of this unexpected solar-powered discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between solar power generation in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA has been a surprisingly underexplored topic in academic literature. However, recent investigations have shed some light on this intriguing relationship, much like finding a hidden Easter egg in a video game.
In "Smith and Doe's Study on Renewable Energy and Automotive Recalls," the authors find a preliminary positive association between solar power generation and automotive recalls. As the solar panels harness the sun's energy, it appears that there may be an unintended consequence on the horsepower of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, much like how a solar-powered car left out in the rain may face a "recharge" of a different kind.
Building upon this foundation, "Jones et al.'s Analysis of Solar Energy Trends and Automotive Defects" delves deeper into the temporal patterns of solar power generation and automotive recalls. The authors reveal an intriguing temporal correlation that fluctuates with the changing seasons, much like how a convertible's top may go up and down with the weather. This unearths the potential influence of sunshine on the internal mechanisms of the vehicles, akin to how a sunny day may coax out the unexpected noises in a car's engine.
Shifting gears, let us take a moment to consider some non-fiction books that have contributed valuable insights to the intersection of solar power and automotive mishaps. "The Solar Economy: Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Global Future" by Hermann Scheer unravels the potential of solar energy while shedding light on its broader impact, not unlike how a bright idea can lead to unforeseen consequences. Similarly, "Car Trouble: A Novel" by Robert Rorke imaginatively intertwines the world of automotive recalls and personal tribulations, reminiscent of the curious connection we are exploring.
On a lighter note, let us not forget the fictional realm and its speculative contributions to our understanding of solar power and automotive follies. "Sunshine" by Robin McKinley and "Speed Racer" by Tatsuo Yoshida offer imaginative narratives that, while not directly related to our research, remind us of the diverse ways in which the topics at hand can intersect, much like an unexpected detour on a road trip.
Moving from the printed page to the silver screen, the movie "The Electric Car" offers an intriguing portrayal of the potential future of automotive technology, incorporating elements of solar power and electric vehicles. Delving into pop culture, the film "The Italian Job" provides an entertaining exploration of automotive capers, which, while tangential to our research, never fails to rev our engines with its thrilling heists and high-speed pursuits.
While the connection between solar power generation and automotive recalls may seem as improbable as a solar-powered flashlight, our research sets out to illuminate this unexplored territory with the enthusiasm of a pun-loving academic at happy hour. Join us as we navigate this unconventional terrain, exploring the unexpected twists and turns with the flair of a well-delivered dad joke at a scientific symposium.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. This strong positive relationship is as striking as a lightning bolt hitting a sunflower field. It seems that as solar energy basks in its glory, Mercedes-Benz vehicles face an increased likelihood of encountering automotive hiccups, creating a real "solar flare" of automotive setbacks.
The r-squared value of 0.9376746 further illuminates the extent of this connection, akin to a bright headlight piercing through a foggy statistical landscape. This high r-squared value indicates that approximately 93.77% of the variability in automotive recalls can be explained by the variability in solar power generation. It's almost as if the sun itself is leaving its mark on the automotive industry, much like a playful signature on a vital research finding.
The statistical significance of the relationship is undeniable, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding is as rare as a solar eclipse and as momentous as a groundbreaking discovery in the world of statistics. One may say that this association shines as brightly as the midday sun, highlighting the intriguing interplay between solar power and automotive recalls.
The strong correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, where a scatterplot exhibits the tightly clustered points, resembling the tight alignment of solar panels on a sunny day. The figure accentuates the robust association between solar power and automotive recalls, as conspicuous as a gleaming sports car on a showroom floor.
This compelling linkage challenges our understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and automotive performance, suggesting that the sun's influence extends beyond solar panels and into the domain of automotive engineering and recalls.
It seems that this research has truly "driven" home the point that while solar power may energize our homes, it also impacts the automotive realm in unexpected ways. We invite readers to join us in embracing the "sun"derful revelations uncovered by this study and to bask in the light of this unexpected solar-powered discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study not only confirm but also illuminate the previously suggested positive association between solar power generation in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It appears that as solar power flourishes, so do the probabilities of facing automotive setbacks—a correlation as undeniable as the gravitational pull of a particularly large planet. The statistical significance and robustness of our findings parallel the thoroughness of a solar-powered rover exploring the terrain of a distant planet, leaving no stone unturned nor sunbeam unmeasured.

Our study has shed light on this remarkable connection, highlighting the sun's influence on the automotive industry, much like how a bright idea sparks a flurry of innovative developments. The comprehensive nature of our investigation, spanning nearly four decades, provides a panoramic view of this intriguing interplay, akin to observing the slow but sure rotation of a solar panel throughout the day.

The r-squared value of 0.9376746 signifies that approximately 93.77% of the variability in automotive recalls can be attributed to fluctuations in solar power generation. This statistical clarity is as refreshing as a solar-powered fan on a hot summer day, leaving little room for doubt regarding the impact of solar power on automotive recalls. It's almost as if the sun had left its signature on our statistical findings, reminding us of its undeniable presence in this surprising association.

Our findings challenge the traditional boundaries of environmental influence on automotive performance, as the sun's rays insidiously extend into the realm of automotive engineering and recalls. This unexpected overlap between solar energy and automotive foibles is as intriguing as a complex engineering problem with a simple solution, much like a solar-powered calculator solving statistical mysteries with ease.

In summary, our study not only supports prior research on the positive relationship between solar power generation and automotive recalls but also casts a spotlight on this unconventional intersection, much like a solar-powered light brightening the path to novel scientific discoveries. This unexpected connection serves as a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly distinct domains, inviting us to embrace the sunshine of statistical revelations with the joy of a dad who just discovered the wonders of solar-powered lawn ornaments. Let us await the future research that will undoubtedly illuminate this surprising relationship even further, much like a solar-powered lantern guiding us through uncharted statistical territories.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in United States and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.

Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the world steers towards renewable energy sources, the skies have cleared for solar power to shine. Much like a dad joke at a family gathering, solar energy has a way of illuminating the room. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has motored along, with its fair share of twists, turns, and wrenches thrown into the mix. Our research aims to untangle the synergistic relationship between the solar power generated in the United States and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, bringing some light-hearted humor to the intersection of sunshine and setbacks.
The juxtaposition of solar power and automotive recalls might seem as unlikely as a solar-powered car in Seattle, but as statistics have shown, unexpected correlations often emerge, much like a parallel finding after multiple hypothesis tests. Embracing the spirit of discovery, we set out to explore this unusual pairing with the vigor of a researcher uncovering buried treasure in the data mine.
It is often said that correlation does not imply causation, but in the case of our findings, the connection between these two variables is stronger than the bond between a bolt and a nut. Our research uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9683360, suggesting a closer relationship than that between an engine and its motor oil. This statistically significant association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, catches the eye like a shiny new car in a showroom. It seems that just as the sun's rays power solar panels, they may also exert an influence on the wheels and recalls of Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
Join us as we delve into the high-octane world of statistical analysis, solar power, and automotive recalls, traversing the road less traveled by research and embracing the unexpected detours with the charm of a witty plot twist in a scientific thriller. In the following sections, we present our methodology, results, and discussion, inviting readers to buckle up and enjoy the ride as we navigate this peculiar junction of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. This strong positive relationship is as striking as a lightning bolt hitting a sunflower field. It seems that as solar energy basks in its glory, Mercedes-Benz vehicles face an increased likelihood of encountering automotive hiccups, creating a real "solar flare" of automotive setbacks.
The r-squared value of 0.9376746 further illuminates the extent of this connection, akin to a bright headlight piercing through a foggy statistical landscape. This high r-squared value indicates that approximately 93.77% of the variability in automotive recalls can be explained by the variability in solar power generation. It's almost as if the sun itself is leaving its mark on the automotive industry, much like a playful signature on a vital research finding.
The statistical significance of the relationship is undeniable, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding is as rare as a solar eclipse and as momentous as a groundbreaking discovery in the world of statistics. One may say that this association shines as brightly as the midday sun, highlighting the intriguing interplay between solar power and automotive recalls.
The strong correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, where a scatterplot exhibits the tightly clustered points, resembling the tight alignment of solar panels on a sunny day. The figure accentuates the robust association between solar power and automotive recalls, as conspicuous as a gleaming sports car on a showroom floor.
This compelling linkage challenges our understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and automotive performance, suggesting that the sun's influence extends beyond solar panels and into the domain of automotive engineering and recalls.
It seems that this research has truly "driven" home the point that while solar power may energize our homes, it also impacts the automotive realm in unexpected ways. We invite readers to join us in embracing the "sun"derful revelations uncovered by this study and to bask in the light of this unexpected solar-powered discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the surprising connection between solar power generation in the United States and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our findings have illuminated a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9683360, leaving no "solar" doubts about the strength of this relationship. It seems that as the sun's energy radiates across the nation, it also casts a shadow on the automotive industry, much like a pun casting its play on words.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the robustness of this association, much like a well-anchored solar panel on a sunny day. This unexpected correlation has sparked more intrigue than a solar-powered car in a crowded parking lot, leading us to ponder new avenues of research, or "sunlit" paths, if you will.

This groundbreaking observation challenges traditional perspectives on the influence of environmental factors on automotive performance, leaving us with more questions than a solar-powered calculator. It seems that while we've uncovered an enlightening connection, there's still more to "unearth" in this fascinating intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.‌‌

However, it is our firm belief that no further research is needed in this area. After all, too much analysis can lead to "sun" paralysis, and we wouldn't want to overheat our statistical engines. Sometimes, it's best to let a solar discovery shine on its own, much like a midsummer day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Renewable Energy and Automotive Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Energy and Automotive Safety (ISEAS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Solar Solutions and Stuttgart Setbacks: A Study on Solar Power and Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls with an abstract of This paper presents a groundbreaking analysis of the relationship between solar power generated in the United States and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research team delved into this merging of sunshine and setbacks, much like a solar-powered convertible cruising through a hailstorm. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted an in-depth investigation spanning from 1984 to 2021.
Our findings revealed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9683360 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between solar power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while solar power soars, the number of Stuttgart setbacks swoops up as well, akin to a peak in fuel efficiency prior to an oncoming recall. It appears that the rays of the sun may be shedding light on more than just solar panels, hinting at a connection with automotive foibles. We invite readers to buckle up and join us on this enlightening journey into the surprising intersection of solar solutions and Stuttgart setbacks.

ChatGPT:

solar power, automotive recalls, Mercedes-Benz USA, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, solar power generation, solar panels, correlation coefficient, p-value, fuel efficiency, solar solutions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Solar power generated in United States
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in United States in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in United States

Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA

Correlation r = 0.9683360 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9376746 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Solar power generated in United States) over the 38 years from 1984 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-23. 0.0000000000000000000000274135
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 2.7E-21% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,478,377,441,771,393,122,304 random variables You don't actually need 36 sextillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Solar power generated in United States (Billion kWh)0.005247920.01063020.0140320.01049710.009094150.2815280.4022910.511070.442860.5098430.5396970.55750.590920.589230.5907760.597810.6099050.6836440.7218290.7289980.8167210.9127411.03631.35812.063652.503213.750445.8512710.823117.216828.923739.032254.866577.277193.3646106.894130.721163.703
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls)321220311322312446534553833484618233839333849




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00524792,0.0106302,0.014032,0.0104971,0.00909415,0.281528,0.402291,0.51107,0.44286,0.509843,0.539697,0.5575,0.59092,0.58923,0.590776,0.59781,0.609905,0.683644,0.721829,0.728998,0.816721,0.912741,1.0363,1.3581,2.06365,2.50321,3.75044,5.85127,10.8231,17.2168,28.9237,39.0322,54.8665,77.2771,93.3646,106.894,130.721,163.703,])
array_2 = np.array([3,2,1,2,2,0,3,1,1,3,2,2,3,1,2,4,4,6,5,3,4,5,5,3,8,3,3,4,8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,])
array_1_name = "Solar power generated in United States"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3736 · Black Variable ID: 24078 · Red Variable ID: 1122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0