about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,739 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Electricity generation in Liberia and the second variable is Google searches for 'that is sus'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As electricity generation in Liberia increased, more people had the power to play online games, which led to an uptick in using the slang term "sus" from the game Among Us, causing the Google searches for 'that is sus' to surge. A shocking connection, indeed!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that depicts a group of friends in Liberia gathered around a laptop, engrossed in playing Among Us. The scene is set in a futuristic environment with newly installed solar panels generating electricity, their glow illuminating the surroundings. One of the friends is looking over another's shoulder with a suspicious expression, while a nearby smartphone screen shows a Google search for "that is sus." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Sci-fi fantacy Minimalism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus', in the following situation: Because more electricity means more Among Us gameplay, leading to increased suspicion and subsequent Google searches for "that is sus.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Liberia, a group of friends gather around a laptop playing Among Us, illuminated by the glow of the newly installed solar panels generating electricity. As the tension in the game rises, one player is looking over another's shoulder, their suspicious expression mirrored by the Google search for "that is sus" on the nearby smartphone screen.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In Liberia, a group of friends gather around a laptop playing Among Us, illuminated by the glow of the newly installed solar panels generating electricity. As the tension in the game rises, one player is looking over another's shoulder, their suspicious expression mirrored by the Google search for "that is sus" on the nearby smartphone screen. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that depicts a group of friends in Liberia gathered around a laptop, engrossed in playing Among Us. The scene is set in a futuristic environment with newly installed solar panels generating electricity, their glow illuminating the surroundings. One of the friends is looking over another's shoulder with a suspicious expression, while a nearby smartphone screen shows a Google search for "that is sus."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Electricity generation in Liberia caused that is sus (Google searches for 'that is sus') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

The Journal of Electromagnetic Sus Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Why did the electricity go out at the Liberian research facility?

Because it couldn't conduct itself properly!

In the realm of empirical research, the quest to uncover unusual and unexpected relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena has always captivated the curious minds of scholars. Today, we delve into the fascinating confluence between electricity generation in Liberia and the surge in Google searches for 'that is sus.' As we embark on this electrifying exploration, we are compelled to shed light on the intriguing correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities. It's a bit like discovering a spark of mystery in the vast field of data analysis, isn't it?

The interplay between electrical power and internet search behavior poses a peculiar conundrum that demands meticulous investigation. It's almost as if the universe is running an elaborate game of hide-and-seek with us, revealing unexpected connections that ignite our intellectual curiosity. *It seems like the cosmic joke is on us, but we're here for it!*

These findings not only invite contemplation but also carry significant implications for understanding the intricate web of human behavior and technological development. It's as if we've stumbled upon a riddle that integrates the domains of energy infrastructure and digital communication, reminding us that the world is a source of endless surprises and, dare I say, 'shocking' revelations.

So, let's embark on this illuminating journey as we unravel the strange yet captivating relationship between Liberian electricity and the enigmatic resonance of 'that is sus' in the digital sphere. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to bring light to the most unexpected of places, even if it involves exploring the dark web of statistical data and internet memes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Why did the electricity go out at the Liberian research facility?
Because it couldn't conduct itself properly!
In the realm of empirical research, the quest to uncover unusual and unexpected relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena has always captivated the curious minds of scholars. Today, we delve into the fascinating confluence between electricity generation in Liberia and the surge in Google searches for 'that is sus.' As we embark on this electrifying exploration, we are compelled to shed light on the intriguing correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities. It's a bit like discovering a spark of mystery in the vast field of data analysis, isn't it?
The interplay between electrical power and internet search behavior poses a peculiar conundrum that demands meticulous investigation. It's almost as if the universe is running an elaborate game of hide-and-seek with us, revealing unexpected connections that ignite our intellectual curiosity. *It seems like the cosmic joke is on us, but we're here for it!*
These findings not only invite contemplation but also carry significant implications for understanding the intricate web of human behavior and technological development. It's as if we've stumbled upon a riddle that integrates the domains of energy infrastructure and digital communication, reminding us that the world is a source of endless surprises and, dare I say, 'shocking' revelations.
So, let's embark on this illuminating journey as we unravel the strange yet captivating relationship between Liberian electricity and the enigmatic resonance of 'that is sus' in the digital sphere. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to bring light to the most unexpected of places, even if it involves exploring the dark web of statistical data and internet memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Studies exploring the intersection of electricity generation and online phenomena have traditionally focused on more conventional topics. Smith and Doe (2008) outlined the impact of electricity availability on economic development, while Jones (2014) delved into the socio-political implications of power outages. However, as we venture into unexplored territory, the connection between electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus' presents an electrifying departure from the norm. *It seems we've stumbled upon a 'current' affair that electrifies scholarly discourse.*

In "Power Struggles: The Role of Electricity in Societal Dynamics," the authors elucidate the intricate link between power infrastructure and social dynamics, but they might have missed the 'jolt' of excitement that arises when observing internet memes in action. *Looks like they could use a 'jolt' of humor in their research, am I right?*

Moreover, Ipsum's (2017) analysis of global internet search trends touches upon various phenomena, yet somehow overlooks the flash of enigmatic energy generated by 'that is sus' queries in Liberia. As we illuminate this uncharted terrain, it becomes evident that our research not only traverses unexpected coordinates but also harnesses the 'shock' factor of unearthing unconventional correlations. *It's as if we've discovered a hidden 'circuit' of connection, isn't it?*

Turning to more tangentially related literature, books such as "Watts in Your Pocket: A Consumer's Guide to Electricity" and "Digital Mysteries: Unraveling the WEB of Curious Internet Behavior" beckon us into the realm of relevant knowledge. However, it is the fictional works like "The Electric Adventures of Suspect Zero" and "The Charge of the Meme Brigade" that ignite our imagination and infuse our research journey with an unexpected surge of humor and curiosity. We must always stay 'current' with our reading, after all.

As we transition into the realm of popular culture to broaden our understanding, TV shows like "Stranger Things" and "Black Mirror" offer glimpses into the intriguing interplay between technology and societal dynamics, reminding us that reality often mirrors fiction in the most 'shocking' of ways. *It's as if the real-life drama of our research rivals the suspense of a thrilling TV series!*

In sum, our foray into the world of literature and media not only enriches our scholarly inquiry but also reminds us that the journey of discovery is not confined to academic tomes. Sometimes, the most electrifying insights arise from unexpected and amusing sources. *It's all about keeping the 'spark' of curiosity alive!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Why did the electricity go out at the Liberian research facility?
Because it couldn't conduct itself properly!
In the realm of empirical research, the quest to uncover unusual and unexpected relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena has always captivated the curious minds of scholars. Today, we delve into the fascinating confluence between electricity generation in Liberia and the surge in Google searches for 'that is sus.' As we embark on this electrifying exploration, we are compelled to shed light on the intriguing correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities. It's a bit like discovering a spark of mystery in the vast field of data analysis, isn't it?
The interplay between electrical power and internet search behavior poses a peculiar conundrum that demands meticulous investigation. It's almost as if the universe is running an elaborate game of hide-and-seek with us, revealing unexpected connections that ignite our intellectual curiosity. *It seems like the cosmic joke is on us, but we're here for it!*
These findings not only invite contemplation but also carry significant implications for understanding the intricate web of human behavior and technological development. It's as if we've stumbled upon a riddle that integrates the domains of energy infrastructure and digital communication, reminding us that the world is a source of endless surprises and, dare I say, 'shocking' revelations.
So, let's embark on this illuminating journey as we unravel the strange yet captivating relationship between Liberian electricity and the enigmatic resonance of 'that is sus' in the digital sphere. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to bring light to the most unexpected of places, even if it involves exploring the dark web of statistical data and internet memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Hang on to your hats, folks, because we're about to dive into the electrifying details of our bewildering methodology. Strap in, because we're about to make the shocking leap from electricity to internet memes.

To kick things off, we harnessed the immense power of data analytics and statistical wizardry to wrangle information from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) regarding electricity generation in Liberia from 2004 to 2021. We pulled out all the stops to ensure a thorough and comprehensive analysis, even if it meant braving the treacherous currents of data collection. *You could say we were fully "watt-ing" in anticipation!*

Next, with a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of mischief, we ventured into the perplexing realm of Google Trends. There, we scoured the digital landscape to unearth the frequency of searches for the phrase 'that is sus' over the same time period. Like intrepid explorers charting unexplored territory, we navigated the unpredictable terrain of internet search trends, all in the name of shedding light on this enigmatic correlation. *It was like navigating a sea of data, and trust me, we "watt" not prepared for the choppy waters!*

With our trusty spreadsheets and graphing tools in tow, we meticulously plotted and scrutinized the data to uncover any potential connections between Liberia's electricity generation and the ebb and flow of 'that is sus' queries. We summoned all the analytical forces at our disposal, unraveling the mysteries of correlation coefficients and p-values to illuminate this uncanny relationship. *We were on a mission to crack the code, and we definitely didn't want to be left in the dark!*

In a rather shocking turn of events, our analysis revealed a surprisingly strong correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9609074 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seemed as though the forces of statistical probability were truly in our favor, aligning in an unexpected dance of numerical harmony. *It was a "positively charged" moment, to say the least!*

Lastly, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we employed a battery of statistical tests and sensitivity analyses, subjecting our results to rigorous scrutiny. We wanted to be absolutely certain that our conclusions were more than just a flicker in the darkness of statistical noise. *We were determined to avoid any short circuits in our analysis, even if it meant enduring a few "electrifying" moments of doubt!*

In the end, our methodological approach may seem unconventional, but it's all part of the scientific adventure. After all, when it comes to unraveling the mysteries of the universe, a little bit of unexpected humor can be just the spark we need to shed light on the most bewildering connections.

Next up, get ready to bask in the radiant glow of our scintillating results. It's going to feel like finding the light switch in a dark room—once you see it, you'll wonder how you didn't notice it before!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9609074, r-squared of 0.9233430, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Why did the electricity go out at the Liberian research facility?
Because it couldn't conduct itself properly!
In the realm of empirical research, the quest to uncover unusual and unexpected relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena has always captivated the curious minds of scholars. Today, we delve into the fascinating confluence between electricity generation in Liberia and the surge in Google searches for 'that is sus.' As we embark on this electrifying exploration, we are compelled to shed light on the intriguing correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities. It's a bit like discovering a spark of mystery in the vast field of data analysis, isn't it?
The interplay between electrical power and internet search behavior poses a peculiar conundrum that demands meticulous investigation. It's almost as if the universe is running an elaborate game of hide-and-seek with us, revealing unexpected connections that ignite our intellectual curiosity. *It seems like the cosmic joke is on us, but we're here for it!*
These findings not only invite contemplation but also carry significant implications for understanding the intricate web of human behavior and technological development. It's as if we've stumbled upon a riddle that integrates the domains of energy infrastructure and digital communication, reminding us that the world is a source of endless surprises and, dare I say, 'shocking' revelations.
So, let's embark on this illuminating journey as we unravel the strange yet captivating relationship between Liberian electricity and the enigmatic resonance of 'that is sus' in the digital sphere. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to bring light to the most unexpected of places, even if it involves exploring the dark web of statistical data and internet memes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus' yielded a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074, suggesting a robust positive relationship. This significant correlation signifies a compelling connection between the two variables, affirming that the increase in electricity generation coincides with a surge in Google searches for the popular phrase. *It's as if these trends are 'shockingly' synchronized!*

The high coefficient also indicates that as the electricity generation in Liberia rose or fell, the frequency of the 'that is sus' searches on Google mirrored these fluctuations with impressive fidelity. It's almost as if the people of Liberia were subconsciously expressing their suspicions about the power supply through their digital queries. *Looks like the data gave us a real 'jolt' with this finding!*

Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between electricity generation and Google searches for 'that is sus.' The tightly clustered data points paint a vivid picture of the synchronized ebb and flow between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. *Who could have thought that electricity and internet memes could have so much in common? It's truly a 'powerful' revelation!*

The r-squared value of 0.9233430 further indicates that approximately 92.33% of the variation in the frequency of 'that is sus' searches can be explained by changes in electricity generation. This substantial proportion underscores the close correspondence between the two variables, affirming the coherence of their fluctuations over the study period. *It's like witnessing an intricate dance between kilowatts and catchphrases!*

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a decisive exclamation point to the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This tiny p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship, lending further credibility to the unexpected and thought-provoking finding of a electricity-generation-'that is sus' nexus. *We might need to 'recharge' after this electrifying discovery!*

Overall, the results of our analysis reveal an unsuspected coherence between electricity generation in Liberia and the prevalence of 'that is sus' searches on Google, unlocking a surprising dimension of societal interconnectedness and digital culture. It's nothing short of a 'shocking' revelation that challenges our preconceptions and leaves us pondering the complex dynamics of technological interconnectedness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Studies exploring the intersection of electricity generation and online phenomena have traditionally focused on more conventional topics. Smith and Doe (2008) outlined the impact of electricity availability on economic development, while Jones (2014) delved into the socio-political implications of power outages. However, as we venture into unexplored territory, the connection between electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus' presents an electrifying departure from the norm. *It seems we've stumbled upon a 'current' affair that electrifies scholarly discourse.*
In "Power Struggles: The Role of Electricity in Societal Dynamics," the authors elucidate the intricate link between power infrastructure and social dynamics, but they might have missed the 'jolt' of excitement that arises when observing internet memes in action. *Looks like they could use a 'jolt' of humor in their research, am I right?*
Moreover, Ipsum's (2017) analysis of global internet search trends touches upon various phenomena, yet somehow overlooks the flash of enigmatic energy generated by 'that is sus' queries in Liberia. As we illuminate this uncharted terrain, it becomes evident that our research not only traverses unexpected coordinates but also harnesses the 'shock' factor of unearthing unconventional correlations. *It's as if we've discovered a hidden 'circuit' of connection, isn't it?*
Turning to more tangentially related literature, books such as "Watts in Your Pocket: A Consumer's Guide to Electricity" and "Digital Mysteries: Unraveling the WEB of Curious Internet Behavior" beckon us into the realm of relevant knowledge. However, it is the fictional works like "The Electric Adventures of Suspect Zero" and "The Charge of the Meme Brigade" that ignite our imagination and infuse our research journey with an unexpected surge of humor and curiosity. We must always stay 'current' with our reading, after all.
As we transition into the realm of popular culture to broaden our understanding, TV shows like "Stranger Things" and "Black Mirror" offer glimpses into the intriguing interplay between technology and societal dynamics, reminding us that reality often mirrors fiction in the most 'shocking' of ways. *It's as if the real-life drama of our research rivals the suspense of a thrilling TV series!*
In sum, our foray into the world of literature and media not only enriches our scholarly inquiry but also reminds us that the journey of discovery is not confined to academic tomes. Sometimes, the most electrifying insights arise from unexpected and amusing sources. *It's all about keeping the 'spark' of curiosity alive!*

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus' yielded a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074, suggesting a robust positive relationship. This significant correlation signifies a compelling connection between the two variables, affirming that the increase in electricity generation coincides with a surge in Google searches for the popular phrase. *It's as if these trends are 'shockingly' synchronized!*
The high coefficient also indicates that as the electricity generation in Liberia rose or fell, the frequency of the 'that is sus' searches on Google mirrored these fluctuations with impressive fidelity. It's almost as if the people of Liberia were subconsciously expressing their suspicions about the power supply through their digital queries. *Looks like the data gave us a real 'jolt' with this finding!*
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between electricity generation and Google searches for 'that is sus.' The tightly clustered data points paint a vivid picture of the synchronized ebb and flow between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. *Who could have thought that electricity and internet memes could have so much in common? It's truly a 'powerful' revelation!*
The r-squared value of 0.9233430 further indicates that approximately 92.33% of the variation in the frequency of 'that is sus' searches can be explained by changes in electricity generation. This substantial proportion underscores the close correspondence between the two variables, affirming the coherence of their fluctuations over the study period. *It's like witnessing an intricate dance between kilowatts and catchphrases!*
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a decisive exclamation point to the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This tiny p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship, lending further credibility to the unexpected and thought-provoking finding of a electricity-generation-'that is sus' nexus. *We might need to 'recharge' after this electrifying discovery!*
Overall, the results of our analysis reveal an unsuspected coherence between electricity generation in Liberia and the prevalence of 'that is sus' searches on Google, unlocking a surprising dimension of societal interconnectedness and digital culture. It's nothing short of a 'shocking' revelation that challenges our preconceptions and leaves us pondering the complex dynamics of technological interconnectedness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study definitively support the prior research that pointed toward the occurrence of unexpected and seemingly unrelated correlations. Our findings have illuminated a concrete and statistically significant connection between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequency of Google searches for 'that is sus.' The robust positive correlation coefficient and extremely low p-value unambiguously demonstrate that as electricity generation fluctuated, so did the prevalence of 'that is sus' searches on Google. Just as previous scholars have delved into the impact of electricity availability on economic development and the socio-political implications of power outages, our research reaffirms the belief that electricity dynamics can indeed influence societal behaviors, albeit in an entirely unexpected manner. *It's as if the lights are flickering on and off in the world of academic inquiry!*

Our results have not only provided empirical support for the unanticipated connection between these variables but have also shed light on the heretofore overlooked influence of electricity dynamics on digital culture. The strength of the correlation, the high explanatory power indicated by the r-squared value, and the minuscule p-value collectively point to a compelling coherence between electricity generation and online meme behavior in Liberia. It appears that the people of Liberia are expressing their suspicions not only about power supply but also perhaps about other aspects of life through their digital interactions, creating a provocative confluence of energy and online culture. *Looks like they're getting 'amped up' by more than just electricity!*

Moreover, our findings challenge the conventional boundaries of interdisciplinary research, offering a powerful testament to the potential revelations that emerge from uncharted intersections. While our discussion may seem to have been 'electrifying,' we must remember that this illuminating research has sparked broader questions about the subtle ways in which infrastructural dynamics intersect with digital expressions in the modern age. By embarking on this unconventional scholarly journey, we have not only contributed to the body of knowledge in energy economics and internet memeology but also aroused curiosity about the unexpected concatenations that await exploration. *I guess you could say we're 'watt-ing' for others to join in on our charged debate!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.

The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*

Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Why did the electricity go out at the Liberian research facility?
Because it couldn't conduct itself properly!
In the realm of empirical research, the quest to uncover unusual and unexpected relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena has always captivated the curious minds of scholars. Today, we delve into the fascinating confluence between electricity generation in Liberia and the surge in Google searches for 'that is sus.' As we embark on this electrifying exploration, we are compelled to shed light on the intriguing correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities. It's a bit like discovering a spark of mystery in the vast field of data analysis, isn't it?
The interplay between electrical power and internet search behavior poses a peculiar conundrum that demands meticulous investigation. It's almost as if the universe is running an elaborate game of hide-and-seek with us, revealing unexpected connections that ignite our intellectual curiosity. *It seems like the cosmic joke is on us, but we're here for it!*
These findings not only invite contemplation but also carry significant implications for understanding the intricate web of human behavior and technological development. It's as if we've stumbled upon a riddle that integrates the domains of energy infrastructure and digital communication, reminding us that the world is a source of endless surprises and, dare I say, 'shocking' revelations.
So, let's embark on this illuminating journey as we unravel the strange yet captivating relationship between Liberian electricity and the enigmatic resonance of 'that is sus' in the digital sphere. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to bring light to the most unexpected of places, even if it involves exploring the dark web of statistical data and internet memes.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between electricity generation in Liberia and Google searches for 'that is sus' yielded a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074, suggesting a robust positive relationship. This significant correlation signifies a compelling connection between the two variables, affirming that the increase in electricity generation coincides with a surge in Google searches for the popular phrase. *It's as if these trends are 'shockingly' synchronized!*
The high coefficient also indicates that as the electricity generation in Liberia rose or fell, the frequency of the 'that is sus' searches on Google mirrored these fluctuations with impressive fidelity. It's almost as if the people of Liberia were subconsciously expressing their suspicions about the power supply through their digital queries. *Looks like the data gave us a real 'jolt' with this finding!*
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between electricity generation and Google searches for 'that is sus.' The tightly clustered data points paint a vivid picture of the synchronized ebb and flow between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. *Who could have thought that electricity and internet memes could have so much in common? It's truly a 'powerful' revelation!*
The r-squared value of 0.9233430 further indicates that approximately 92.33% of the variation in the frequency of 'that is sus' searches can be explained by changes in electricity generation. This substantial proportion underscores the close correspondence between the two variables, affirming the coherence of their fluctuations over the study period. *It's like witnessing an intricate dance between kilowatts and catchphrases!*
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds a decisive exclamation point to the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This tiny p-value provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship, lending further credibility to the unexpected and thought-provoking finding of a electricity-generation-'that is sus' nexus. *We might need to 'recharge' after this electrifying discovery!*
Overall, the results of our analysis reveal an unsuspected coherence between electricity generation in Liberia and the prevalence of 'that is sus' searches on Google, unlocking a surprising dimension of societal interconnectedness and digital culture. It's nothing short of a 'shocking' revelation that challenges our preconceptions and leaves us pondering the complex dynamics of technological interconnectedness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has shed an illuminating light on the intriguing relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the widespread Google searches for 'that is sus.' Our findings have sparked a 'jolt' of curiosity and opened up a fascinating dialogue at the intersection of energy infrastructure and online discourse. By uncovering this unexpected correlation, we've proven that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there's a 'powerful' connection waiting to be discovered. *Looks like these phenomena were truly 'watt' the doctor ordered!*

The strength of the correlation coefficient and the consequential p-value have undeniably established the significant and 'shocking' coherence between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the Liberian populace is expressing their suspicions about the power supply through digital means, creating a truly electrifying pattern. *Who knew that electricity and online catchphrases could be so 'current' with each other?*

Further interdisciplinary investigations will be essential to fully comprehend the broader implications of our discovery. It seems we've stumbled upon a 'recharged' paradigm for understanding the multifaceted interactions between infrastructural developments and digital expressions. And maybe, just maybe, this investigation will 'power' the way for future research that delves into the unexpected connections between memes and societal trends. *It's as if the universe is saying, 'Let's keep the current flowing!'*

Ultimately, with our findings in mind, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. We've 'shocked' the world with our discovery, and it's time to 'plug out' and enjoy the 'electrifying' implications of our work. *It's as if we've officially 'charged' up the field of unusual correlations!*


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Electromagnetic Sus Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shocking Sus-picion: Illuminating the Correspondence between Electricity Generation in Liberia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus' with an abstract of In this paper, we shed light on the unexpected relationship between electricity generation in Liberia and the frequent Google searches for 'that is sus.' The peculiar interplay between these two seemingly unrelated variables has been a source of puzzlement for scholars and casual observers alike. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9609074 and a confidently small p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2004 to 2021.
The findings suggest a striking pattern that invites much intrigue and, one could even say, shock. Our analysis opens up a stimulating dialogue about the potential implications of electrical power on the socio-cultural fabric of online behavior. It's electrifying to witness how seemingly disparate phenomena can spark dialogue and inquiry. *Looks like we've got some 'current' events to discuss, eh?*
Furthermore, our research opens up a brighter future for interdisciplinary investigations, where fields as diverse as energy economics and internet memeology converge. It seems that this investigation has truly "lit up" the scholarly community with its unexpected and enlightening results. We invite readers to join us in pondering the electric mystery of why Liberian electricity and a popular catchphrase seem to move in similar circuits. *Perhaps we're onto something truly 'shocking' here!*

ChatGPT:

electricity generation, Liberia, Google searches, 'that is sus', correlation coefficient, Google Trends, Energy Information Administration, socio-cultural fabric, online behavior, interdisciplinary investigations, energy economics, internet memeology

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Electricity generation in Liberia
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Liberia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Liberia

Google searches for 'that is sus'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'that is sus' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'that is sus'

Correlation r = 0.9609074 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9233430 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'that is sus') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Electricity generation in Liberia) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-10. 0.0000000002425773238249541400
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 2.4E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,122,396,868 random variables You don't actually need 4 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Electricity generation in Liberia (Billion kWh)0.20.20.20.250.250.250.250.280.280.2820.2820.2910.3760.3760.3220.3180.8970.920232
Google searches for 'that is sus' (Rel. search volume)3.833337.083338.666673.833331.333336.416675.583336.9166710.2510.08338.666678.6666711.083312.515.416714.416740.833358.1667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.2,0.2,0.2,0.25,0.25,0.25,0.25,0.28,0.28,0.282,0.282,0.291,0.376,0.376,0.322,0.318,0.897,0.920232,])
array_2 = np.array([3.83333,7.08333,8.66667,3.83333,1.33333,6.41667,5.58333,6.91667,10.25,10.0833,8.66667,8.66667,11.0833,12.5,15.4167,14.4167,40.8333,58.1667,])
array_1_name = "Electricity generation in Liberia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'that is sus'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 3739 · Black Variable ID: 23789 · Red Variable ID: 1367
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0