Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of costume attendants in North Carolina rose, so did the demand for elaborate financial superhero costumes. This created a boon for Manulife Financial as investors clamored to get their hands on MFC stock, hoping to super-charge their portfolios. It seems like these costume attendants weren't just dressing for success, but also investing in it!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a bustling North Carolina city scene with a futuristic, high-tech vibe. Show several costume attendants nervously checking their phones, suggesting scarcity, while a large electronic billboard prominently displays the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC) showing a steady upward trend. People should be seen flocking to a nearby Manulife branch seeking assistance in managing their costume budgets amidst the high-tech cityscape. Capture the sense of urgency and technological reliance in this futuristic financial scenario. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic High-tech Woodblock painting High-tech Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC), in the following situation: Because as costume attendants in North Carolina have become more scarce, more people have been turning to financial institutions like Manulife for assistance in managing their extravagant costume budgets, leading to an increase in demand for their services and ultimately boosting their stock price. It's all about the dressing for financial success!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling North Carolina city, several costume attendants are seen nervously looking at their phones, indicating their scarcity. Meanwhile, on a large electronic billboard, the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC) is displayed, showing a steady upward trend. People are shown flocking to a nearby Manulife branch, seeking assistance in managing their costume budgets.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling North Carolina city, several costume attendants are seen nervously looking at their phones, indicating their scarcity. Meanwhile, on a large electronic billboard, the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC) is displayed, showing a steady upward trend. People are shown flocking to a nearby Manulife branch, seeking assistance in managing their costume budgets. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a bustling North Carolina city scene with a futuristic, high-tech vibe. Show several costume attendants nervously checking their phones, suggesting scarcity, while a large electronic billboard prominently displays the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC) showing a steady upward trend. People should be seen flocking to a nearby Manulife branch seeking assistance in managing their costume budgets amidst the high-tech cityscape. Capture the sense of urgency and technological reliance in this futuristic financial scenario.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of costume attendants in North Carolina positively influenced Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial The Journal of Eccentric Economic Connections Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2019.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and fancy dress may at first glance seem more suited to the pages of a whimsical tale than to the serious realm of academic research. However, the unexpected connection between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC) has piqued the curiosity of scholars and investors alike. The aim of this investigation is to unmask the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, revealing whether there is truly substance behind the ruffles and frills.
As the saying goes, "don't judge a stock by its cover," but perhaps we should reconsider, especially if that cover happens to be bedecked in sequins and feathers. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) have revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician do a double-take. The statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants and the stock price of Manulife Financial beckons us to explore the financial implications of wigs, wings, and wizard robes.
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the world of empirical finance, donning our academic spectacles to peer through the glitter and glamour of costume culture. With a twirl of the statistical wand, we seek to unveil the potential impact of costume creativity on a steadfast pillar of the financial world. Join us as we unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation and consider the broader implications for both the world of finance and the enchanting realm of fancy dress. Let's not keep the data waiting – after all, it's time to unmask the link!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and fancy dress may at first glance seem more suited to the pages of a whimsical tale than to the serious realm of academic research. However, the unexpected connection between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC) has piqued the curiosity of scholars and investors alike. The aim of this investigation is to unmask the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, revealing whether there is truly substance behind the ruffles and frills.
As the saying goes, "don't judge a stock by its cover," but perhaps we should reconsider, especially if that cover happens to be bedecked in sequins and feathers. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) have revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician do a double-take. The statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants and the stock price of Manulife Financial beckons us to explore the financial implications of wigs, wings, and wizard robes.
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the world of empirical finance, donning our academic spectacles to peer through the glitter and glamour of costume culture. With a twirl of the statistical wand, we seek to unveil the potential impact of costume creativity on a steadfast pillar of the financial world. Join us as we unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation and consider the broader implications for both the world of finance and the enchanting realm of fancy dress. Let's not keep the data waiting – after all, it's time to unmask the link!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the number of costume attendants in North Carolina exhibits no significant connection to the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC). Similarly, in "Doe and Jones," the researchers conclude that there is no substantial correlation between the two variables under investigation. These findings appear to align with established financial logic, which generally eschews the influence of costume-related activities on stock market dynamics.
However, when the literature extends beyond the realm of traditional finance, a more diverse set of perspectives emerges. In "The Economics of Costumes," Lorem and Ipsum propose a theoretical framework suggesting that costume-related industries may hold hidden potential to impact broader economic indicators, including stock prices. This unconventional viewpoint challenges the conventional wisdom of financial analysis and opens the door to a more colorful interpretation of market dynamics.
Turning to more whimsical sources of inspiration, "The Emperor's New Clothes" by Hans Christian Andersen and "Don Quixote" by Miguel de Cervantes are fictional works that, although not directly related to finance, offer intriguing insights into the power of perception and illusion – themes that may hold relevance in the context of the costume attendant-stock price relationship. The symbolic significance of disguises, masks, and alter egos in literature invites a reconsideration of the potential psychological effects of costume culture on investor behavior, leading to a delightful fusion of artistic interpretation and empirical inquiry.
Further contributing to the discourse are social media posts that reveal intriguing anecdotes and musings related to costume phenomena and financial markets. One post humorously suggests, "Perhaps the key to successful investing lies in donning a superhero cape and channeling the bravery of financial warriors!" while another user comments, "I've always believed that the theatrical flair of costume design could make stocks perform as if they were dancing on Broadway – a show-stopping spectacle!" These lighthearted yet thought-provoking remarks underscore the breadth of public fascination with the potential interplay between costume creativity and stock price movements.
With this diverse array of perspectives, the literature sets the stage for a thorough investigation into the unexpected correlation between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial. As we delve into the depths of this intriguing association, we must embrace both the rigor of empirical analysis and the enchanting allure of fanciful musings, for it is in this balance that the true nature of the link may be unmasked.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2004 to 2019
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and fancy dress may at first glance seem more suited to the pages of a whimsical tale than to the serious realm of academic research. However, the unexpected connection between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC) has piqued the curiosity of scholars and investors alike. The aim of this investigation is to unmask the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, revealing whether there is truly substance behind the ruffles and frills.
As the saying goes, "don't judge a stock by its cover," but perhaps we should reconsider, especially if that cover happens to be bedecked in sequins and feathers. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) have revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician do a double-take. The statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants and the stock price of Manulife Financial beckons us to explore the financial implications of wigs, wings, and wizard robes.
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the world of empirical finance, donning our academic spectacles to peer through the glitter and glamour of costume culture. With a twirl of the statistical wand, we seek to unveil the potential impact of costume creativity on a steadfast pillar of the financial world. Join us as we unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation and consider the broader implications for both the world of finance and the enchanting realm of fancy dress. Let's not keep the data waiting – after all, it's time to unmask the link!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In order to unravel the mystery behind the correlation between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC), a multitude of data from diverse sources was meticulously culled, creating a patchwork quilt of information for in-depth analysis. The principal repositories of data were the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), selected for their comprehensive coverage and reliable insights into the labor market and financial data.
The data collected spanned the prodigious period from 2004 to 2019, capturing fluctuations, trends, and unforeseen gusts of data quirks. The employment figures for costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial were collected with the precision of a master tailor measuring for a bespoke suit.
To quantify the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, a rigorous statistical analysis was undertaken. The correlation coefficient was calculated to measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the number of costume attendants and the stock price of Manulife Financial. Additionally, a p-value was derived to assess the statistical significance of the apparent association, ensuring that the findings were not simply the result of chance or a whimsical fluke.
Furthermore, various econometric models were employed to explore potential causal relationships and the dynamic interplay between these variables. The seemingly whimsical nature of the correlation demanded a robust and comprehensive approach, guiding the research team through the labyrinth of financial and labor data with an analytical magnifying glass in hand.
In addition, supplementary data from an array of unconventional sources, including costume emporiums, theatrical supply stores, and even the occasional masquerade ball, contributed to a design of this study that was as intricate and layered as an ornate theatrical costume. These supplementary data points added a touch of levity and richness to the analysis, mirroring the eclectic and multicolored world of costume culture itself.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2004 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.8842614, r-squared of 0.7819183, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of finance and fancy dress may at first glance seem more suited to the pages of a whimsical tale than to the serious realm of academic research. However, the unexpected connection between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC) has piqued the curiosity of scholars and investors alike. The aim of this investigation is to unmask the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, revealing whether there is truly substance behind the ruffles and frills.
As the saying goes, "don't judge a stock by its cover," but perhaps we should reconsider, especially if that cover happens to be bedecked in sequins and feathers. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) have revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician do a double-take. The statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants and the stock price of Manulife Financial beckons us to explore the financial implications of wigs, wings, and wizard robes.
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the world of empirical finance, donning our academic spectacles to peer through the glitter and glamour of costume culture. With a twirl of the statistical wand, we seek to unveil the potential impact of costume creativity on a steadfast pillar of the financial world. Join us as we unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation and consider the broader implications for both the world of finance and the enchanting realm of fancy dress. Let's not keep the data waiting – after all, it's time to unmask the link!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis conducted over the period from 2004 to 2019 uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC). This coefficient suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these presumably unrelated variables, prompting us to reconsider the potential influence of creative costuming on the financial markets.
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7819183 indicates that approximately 78.19% of the variation in Manulife Financial's stock price can be explained by changes in the number of costume attendants in North Carolina. This finding underscores the substantial impact that the world of fancy dress may have on the financial performance of a multinational insurance and investment company.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the robustness of the identified association, indicating that the probability of observing such a strong correlation by mere chance is exceedingly low. This statistical significance emphasizes the veracity of the link between these seemingly incongruous variables and underscores the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
Figure 1 succinctly encapsulates the formidable correlation between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial. The scatterplot visually conveys the notable pattern of data points, affirming the compelling nature of the observed connection.
In summary, the results of this study reveal a substantial and statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting a reevaluation of the potential impact of costume culture on the financial landscape. This unexpected correlation not only widens the scope of empirical finance but also beckons us to delve into the captivating world of fancy dress, where cobwebs, capes, and clown noses may hold unforeseen sway over the markets.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the number of costume attendants in North Carolina exhibits no significant connection to the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC). Similarly, in "Doe and Jones," the researchers conclude that there is no substantial correlation between the two variables under investigation. These findings appear to align with established financial logic, which generally eschews the influence of costume-related activities on stock market dynamics.
However, when the literature extends beyond the realm of traditional finance, a more diverse set of perspectives emerges. In "The Economics of Costumes," Lorem and Ipsum propose a theoretical framework suggesting that costume-related industries may hold hidden potential to impact broader economic indicators, including stock prices. This unconventional viewpoint challenges the conventional wisdom of financial analysis and opens the door to a more colorful interpretation of market dynamics.
Turning to more whimsical sources of inspiration, "The Emperor's New Clothes" by Hans Christian Andersen and "Don Quixote" by Miguel de Cervantes are fictional works that, although not directly related to finance, offer intriguing insights into the power of perception and illusion – themes that may hold relevance in the context of the costume attendant-stock price relationship. The symbolic significance of disguises, masks, and alter egos in literature invites a reconsideration of the potential psychological effects of costume culture on investor behavior, leading to a delightful fusion of artistic interpretation and empirical inquiry.
Further contributing to the discourse are social media posts that reveal intriguing anecdotes and musings related to costume phenomena and financial markets. One post humorously suggests, "Perhaps the key to successful investing lies in donning a superhero cape and channeling the bravery of financial warriors!" while another user comments, "I've always believed that the theatrical flair of costume design could make stocks perform as if they were dancing on Broadway – a show-stopping spectacle!" These lighthearted yet thought-provoking remarks underscore the breadth of public fascination with the potential interplay between costume creativity and stock price movements.
With this diverse array of perspectives, the literature sets the stage for a thorough investigation into the unexpected correlation between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial. As we delve into the depths of this intriguing association, we must embrace both the rigor of empirical analysis and the enchanting allure of fanciful musings, for it is in this balance that the true nature of the link may be unmasked.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis conducted over the period from 2004 to 2019 uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC). This coefficient suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these presumably unrelated variables, prompting us to reconsider the potential influence of creative costuming on the financial markets.
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7819183 indicates that approximately 78.19% of the variation in Manulife Financial's stock price can be explained by changes in the number of costume attendants in North Carolina. This finding underscores the substantial impact that the world of fancy dress may have on the financial performance of a multinational insurance and investment company.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the robustness of the identified association, indicating that the probability of observing such a strong correlation by mere chance is exceedingly low. This statistical significance emphasizes the veracity of the link between these seemingly incongruous variables and underscores the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
Figure 1 succinctly encapsulates the formidable correlation between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial. The scatterplot visually conveys the notable pattern of data points, affirming the compelling nature of the observed connection.
In summary, the results of this study reveal a substantial and statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting a reevaluation of the potential impact of costume culture on the financial landscape. This unexpected correlation not only widens the scope of empirical finance but also beckons us to delve into the captivating world of fancy dress, where cobwebs, capes, and clown noses may hold unforeseen sway over the markets.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The investigation into the enigmatic relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC) has unveiled a connection that defies conventional financial wisdom. Our findings align with the insightful perspectives presented in the literature. Despite the initial skepticism illustrated by "Smith et al." and "Doe and Jones," our results supported the counterintuitive premise put forth by Lorem and Ipsum, suggesting that costume-related activities may indeed wield unexpected influence over stock market dynamics. Furthermore, our research has echoed the whimsical observations made in social media posts, breathing comical life into the seemingly incongruous association.
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 discovered in our analysis lends weight to the notion that the number of costume attendants in North Carolina exerts a surprisingly potent impact on the stock price performance of Manulife Financial. The coefficient of determination of 0.7819183 underscores the substantial explanatory power of costume-related variations in illuminating changes in MFC's stock price, supporting the premise that the world of fancy dress may play a pivotal role in shaping the financial performance of companies in the insurance and investment sector. The statistical significance of the association, as evidenced by the p-value of less than 0.01, unequivocally fortifies the validity of the identified link between these ostensibly unrelated variables.
In light of our results, it becomes evident that the traditional boundaries of financial analysis must expand to encompass the colorful, creative realm of costume culture. Our study challenges the orthodox interpretation of market dynamics and beckons financial researchers to assess the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on stock price movements. The vibrant world of fancy dress, once relegated to the periphery of empirical finance, now assumes a central role in reshaping our understanding of market influences. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of this unexpected correlation, it is crucial to embrace the humorous and light-hearted comments from social media, for the enthralling fusion of artistic interpretation and rigorous analysis may offer new avenues for understanding the perplexing interplay between costume creativity and stock price dynamics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in North Carolina and Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and fancy dress may at first glance seem more suited to the pages of a whimsical tale than to the serious realm of academic research. However, the unexpected connection between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC) has piqued the curiosity of scholars and investors alike. The aim of this investigation is to unmask the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, revealing whether there is truly substance behind the ruffles and frills.
As the saying goes, "don't judge a stock by its cover," but perhaps we should reconsider, especially if that cover happens to be bedecked in sequins and feathers. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) have revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician do a double-take. The statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants and the stock price of Manulife Financial beckons us to explore the financial implications of wigs, wings, and wizard robes.
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the world of empirical finance, donning our academic spectacles to peer through the glitter and glamour of costume culture. With a twirl of the statistical wand, we seek to unveil the potential impact of costume creativity on a steadfast pillar of the financial world. Join us as we unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation and consider the broader implications for both the world of finance and the enchanting realm of fancy dress. Let's not keep the data waiting – after all, it's time to unmask the link!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis conducted over the period from 2004 to 2019 uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC). This coefficient suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these presumably unrelated variables, prompting us to reconsider the potential influence of creative costuming on the financial markets.
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7819183 indicates that approximately 78.19% of the variation in Manulife Financial's stock price can be explained by changes in the number of costume attendants in North Carolina. This finding underscores the substantial impact that the world of fancy dress may have on the financial performance of a multinational insurance and investment company.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the robustness of the identified association, indicating that the probability of observing such a strong correlation by mere chance is exceedingly low. This statistical significance emphasizes the veracity of the link between these seemingly incongruous variables and underscores the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
Figure 1 succinctly encapsulates the formidable correlation between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial. The scatterplot visually conveys the notable pattern of data points, affirming the compelling nature of the observed connection.
In summary, the results of this study reveal a substantial and statistically significant association between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting a reevaluation of the potential impact of costume culture on the financial landscape. This unexpected correlation not only widens the scope of empirical finance but also beckons us to delve into the captivating world of fancy dress, where cobwebs, capes, and clown noses may hold unforeseen sway over the markets.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the formidable correlation coefficient and p-value have unmasked a surprising link between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial (MFC). This unexpected relationship raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of costume culture on financial markets. As we peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation, it becomes clear that the impact of wigs, capes, and clown noses may extend far beyond the realms of fancy dress into the world of empirical finance.
One might even say that this research has brought new meaning to the term "dressing for success" in the world of finance. As investors ponder their next moves, they may need to consider not only balance sheets and market trends but also the whimsical wardrobe choices of costume attendants. After all, one can never underestimate the power of a well-placed sequin or a cleverly tailored superhero costume.
These findings certainly remind us that, sometimes, the most unexpected connections can yield the most fruitful insights. As we reflect on the implications of this unlikely correlation, let us not forget to appreciate the colorful tapestry of data and the vibrant threads of statistical analysis that have led us to this revelatory conclusion.
In light of these revelatory findings, this study strongly asserts that further research in this area is not necessary. We can confidently declare that the relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price performance of Manulife Financial has been thoroughly investigated. It is time to don our metaphorical academic capes and move on to the next intriguing enigma in the world of empirical finance and whimsical correlations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Eccentric Economic Connections
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Comparative Textile Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial with an abstract of This research aims to shed light on the peculiar relationship between the number of costume attendants in North Carolina and the stock price of Manulife Financial (MFC). Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conduct an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2019. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8842614 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant association between these seemingly disparate variables. Our results prompt an exploration of the potential impact of cobwebs, capes, and clown noses on the financial performance of an insurance and investment company. The implications of this unexpected correlation may extend beyond the realm of empirical finance to the captivating world of fancy dress.
ChatGPT:
"costume attendants North Carolina," "stock price performance Manulife Financial," "Bureau of Labor Statistics costume attendants," "LSEG Analytics Manulife Financial stock price," "financial performance insurance company," "correlation coefficient costume attendants stock price," "relationship costume attendants stock price," "impact costume attendants financial performance," "empirical finance fancy dress correlation"
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of costume attendants in North CarolinaDetailed data title: BLS estimate of costume attendants in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of costume attendants in North Carolina
Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Manulife Financial (MFC) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7819183 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of costume attendants in North Carolina) over the 16 years from 2004 through 2019.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.5E-6. 0.0000054648602873310470000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.00055% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 182,987 random variables You don't actually need 182 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.69, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
The number of costume attendants in North Carolina (Costume Attendants) | 40 | 50 | 90 | 100 | 130 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 40 | 60 |
Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC) (Stock price) | 16.26 | 22.98 | 29.39 | 33.82 | 40.69 | 16.87 | 18.76 | 17.36 | 10.94 | 13.97 | 19.61 | 19.06 | 14.66 | 18.02 | 20.93 | 14 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([40,50,90,100,130,40,40,30,40,50,60,40,50,40,40,60,])
array_2 = np.array([16.26,22.98,29.39,33.82,40.69,16.87,18.76,17.36,10.94,13.97,19.61,19.06,14.66,18.02,20.93,14,])
array_1_name = "The number of costume attendants in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of costume attendants in North Carolina
- Line chart for only Manulife Financial's stock price (MFC)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Unmasking the Link: The Costume Attendants of North Carolina and the Stock Price Performance of Manulife Financial
Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!
Correlation ID: 3746 · Black Variable ID: 17270 · Red Variable ID: 1810