about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,831 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in El Paso and the second variable is Kerosene used in Macau.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air in El Paso cleared up, it created a domino effect. You see, it led to an increase in desirability for outdoor activities, prompting a surge in kite flying. And as we all know, with the rise in kite flying, there comes a great demand for string. Now, Macau happens to be a major manufacturer of kite string, so they had to cut down on their kerosene production to keep up with the string demand. Looks like El Paso's cleaner air really flew over to Macau and sparked a real reel dilemma!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Brutalist cityscape with dense smog over El Paso, where industrial buildings and vehicles emit pollution into the atmosphere. Within the cityscape, include a distinct jet stream carrying kerosene molecules, which transform into shiny hair products when reaching Macau. Show locals in Macau embracing this unique trend with the transformed kerosene molecules incorporated into their hair, creating an unexpected and fashionable statement against the industrial backdrop of El Paso. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Scalar art Brutalism inspired by bauhaus Oragami
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau, in the following situation: Due to a little-known atmospheric phenomenon called the "pollution pathway ripple effect," the increase in air pollution in El Paso led to a spontaneous generation of kerosene molecules, which then hitchhiked on the jet stream to Macau, where they were eagerly embraced as a trendy new hair product for stylish locals.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In El Paso, thick smoggy air engulfs the city, with cars and factories emitting pollution into the atmosphere. Meanwhile, in Macau, locals are seen embracing a new trend as kerosene molecules, carried on the jet stream from El Paso, are now magically transforming into shiny hair products, creating a unique and unexpected fashion statement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In El Paso, thick smoggy air engulfs the city, with cars and factories emitting pollution into the atmosphere. Meanwhile, in Macau, locals are seen embracing a new trend as kerosene molecules, carried on the jet stream from El Paso, are now magically transforming into shiny hair products, creating a unique and unexpected fashion statement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Brutalist cityscape with dense smog over El Paso, where industrial buildings and vehicles emit pollution into the atmosphere. Within the cityscape, include a distinct jet stream carrying kerosene molecules, which transform into shiny hair products when reaching Macau. Show locals in Macau embracing this unique trend with the transformed kerosene molecules incorporated into their hair, creating an unexpected and fashionable statement against the industrial backdrop of El Paso.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in El Paso caused Kerosene used in Macau to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

The Journal of Ecological Quirkiness

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6300578 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between air pollution and the use of kerosene presents a conundrum that piques our scientific curiosity. The mundane act of burning kerosene lamps in Macau and the air quality in El Paso seem worlds apart, yet our inquiry has unveiled an unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a dash of statistical prowess and a sprinkling of scientific skepticism, we embarked on this investigative journey to discern the mysterious correlation lurking beneath the surface.

As we delve into the depths of this inquisitive exploration, it's crucial to acknowledge the alluring charm of statistical analysis in uncovering hidden patterns. Like detectives of the data world, we sought to unveil the veiled interconnections that would escape the untrained eye. Our statistical sleuthing has revealed a correlation coefficient that raises an intrigued eyebrow – 0.6300578, to be exact. This coefficient, coupled with a p-value of less than 0.01, tantalizingly compels us to consider the potential interconnectedness of kerosene usage and air quality.

Through the lens of our statistical Sherlocking, we are compelled to consider unanticipated societal and environmental implications. Could the burning of kerosene in a densely populated city perched on the Pearl River Delta send ripples of influence across continents, ultimately manifesting as air pollution in the border city of El Paso? An intriguing possibility indeed, one that renders us akin to contemplative chess players, speculating on the intricate moves of Mother Nature.

Eager to share these surprising findings, we invite fellow inquisitive minds to join us in unraveling this curious correlation. For, in the world of research, it's not every day that one unearths a link between the flickering flame of a kerosene lamp and the coalescing smog over a Texan horizon. This enigmatic connection beckons us to revisit our assumptions, spurring us to embrace the unanticipated and cast our net of inquiry wider than ever before.

As we embark on this scholarly odyssey to demystify this curious correlation, we don our analytical caps and set out to navigate the labyrinth of data with vigor and a hint of scientific whimsy. After all, who said unraveling scientific enigmas couldn’t be sprinkled with a dash of humor and unexpected discoveries?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between air pollution and the use of kerosene presents a conundrum that piques our scientific curiosity. The mundane act of burning kerosene lamps in Macau and the air quality in El Paso seem worlds apart, yet our inquiry has unveiled an unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a dash of statistical prowess and a sprinkling of scientific skepticism, we embarked on this investigative journey to discern the mysterious correlation lurking beneath the surface.
As we delve into the depths of this inquisitive exploration, it's crucial to acknowledge the alluring charm of statistical analysis in uncovering hidden patterns. Like detectives of the data world, we sought to unveil the veiled interconnections that would escape the untrained eye. Our statistical sleuthing has revealed a correlation coefficient that raises an intrigued eyebrow – 0.6300578, to be exact. This coefficient, coupled with a p-value of less than 0.01, tantalizingly compels us to consider the potential interconnectedness of kerosene usage and air quality.
Through the lens of our statistical Sherlocking, we are compelled to consider unanticipated societal and environmental implications. Could the burning of kerosene in a densely populated city perched on the Pearl River Delta send ripples of influence across continents, ultimately manifesting as air pollution in the border city of El Paso? An intriguing possibility indeed, one that renders us akin to contemplative chess players, speculating on the intricate moves of Mother Nature.
Eager to share these surprising findings, we invite fellow inquisitive minds to join us in unraveling this curious correlation. For, in the world of research, it's not every day that one unearths a link between the flickering flame of a kerosene lamp and the coalescing smog over a Texan horizon. This enigmatic connection beckons us to revisit our assumptions, spurring us to embrace the unanticipated and cast our net of inquiry wider than ever before.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey to demystify this curious correlation, we don our analytical caps and set out to navigate the labyrinth of data with vigor and a hint of scientific whimsy. After all, who said unraveling scientific enigmas couldn’t be sprinkled with a dash of humor and unexpected discoveries?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the entangled mystery of the correlation between air pollution in El Paso and the utilization of kerosene in Macau has prompted researchers to comb through a breadth of academic and scholarly work. At the onset of our exploration, we encountered the weighty tomes of Smith et al. and Doe, whose meticulous analyses painted a serious and somber picture of air quality in urban settings. Smith, et al. in "Air Pollution and Its Societal Impact" expounded upon the dire health implications of air pollution, reminding readers of the sobering reality that lurks behind each puff of contaminated air. Meanwhile, Doe's seminal work "Fuel and Environmental Degradation" offers a stern admonishment about the deleterious effects of unconventional fuel usage on the planet's delicate ecological balance.

Steering our attention toward a less ponderous path, we ventured into the realm of non-fiction literature, where we unearthed captivating accounts of environmental intrigue. "The Air We Breathe: A Global Perspective" by Green delivers an extensive analysis of air quality across continents, while Brown's "Kerosene Chronicles" provides a riveting exploration of the cultural and practical nuances of kerosene usage in diverse global locales. These works lent a serious and scholarly air to our initial investigation, bolstering our understanding of the gravity of the issues at hand.

Transitioning from the factual to the fantastical, we turned our gaze to fiction works that inexplicably seemed to echo the intriguing elements of our puzzling correlation. Through the allegorical prose of "The Pollution Paradox" by Swift and "The Kerosene Conundrum" by Wilde, we stumbled upon uncanny parallels to our own research pursuits – albeit couched in the whimsy of fiction. These imaginative works lent an unexpected charm to our journey, infusing our scholarly pursuits with a touch of literary fantasy.

In a surprising turn of events, the sneaky ninja of inspiration prowled into our scholarly domain by way of popular board games with vague connections to our research topic. The riveting strategy game "Kerosene Conquest" stirred our competitive instincts, while the classic environmental game "Smog City" evoked contemplation about the intricate web of factors influencing urban air quality. These playful diversions injected an unexpected dose of mirth into our research odyssey, reminding us that amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's room for a lighthearted moment or two.

As our literature review journey twists through the scholarly landscape, we find ourselves grappling with an eclectic mix of sources and influences. The solemnity of academic prose rubs elbows with the whimsy of literary fiction and the unexpected nudge of board game amusement, offering a kaleidoscopic view of our scholarly pursuit. With this amalgamation of scholarly and playful influences, we venture forth into the depths of this curious correlation, armed with a deepened scholarly understanding and a twinkle of wry humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between air pollution and the use of kerosene presents a conundrum that piques our scientific curiosity. The mundane act of burning kerosene lamps in Macau and the air quality in El Paso seem worlds apart, yet our inquiry has unveiled an unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a dash of statistical prowess and a sprinkling of scientific skepticism, we embarked on this investigative journey to discern the mysterious correlation lurking beneath the surface.
As we delve into the depths of this inquisitive exploration, it's crucial to acknowledge the alluring charm of statistical analysis in uncovering hidden patterns. Like detectives of the data world, we sought to unveil the veiled interconnections that would escape the untrained eye. Our statistical sleuthing has revealed a correlation coefficient that raises an intrigued eyebrow – 0.6300578, to be exact. This coefficient, coupled with a p-value of less than 0.01, tantalizingly compels us to consider the potential interconnectedness of kerosene usage and air quality.
Through the lens of our statistical Sherlocking, we are compelled to consider unanticipated societal and environmental implications. Could the burning of kerosene in a densely populated city perched on the Pearl River Delta send ripples of influence across continents, ultimately manifesting as air pollution in the border city of El Paso? An intriguing possibility indeed, one that renders us akin to contemplative chess players, speculating on the intricate moves of Mother Nature.
Eager to share these surprising findings, we invite fellow inquisitive minds to join us in unraveling this curious correlation. For, in the world of research, it's not every day that one unearths a link between the flickering flame of a kerosene lamp and the coalescing smog over a Texan horizon. This enigmatic connection beckons us to revisit our assumptions, spurring us to embrace the unanticipated and cast our net of inquiry wider than ever before.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey to demystify this curious correlation, we don our analytical caps and set out to navigate the labyrinth of data with vigor and a hint of scientific whimsy. After all, who said unraveling scientific enigmas couldn’t be sprinkled with a dash of humor and unexpected discoveries?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle this enigmatic connection between air pollution in El Paso and kerosene usage in Macau, our research team embraced a rather unconventional approach, akin to scientific daredevils tiptoeing through the unknown. Our methodology blends the art of data mining, statistical juggling, and a hint of fortuitous stumbling upon correlations, resulting in a concoction that piques the curiosity and tickles the scientific palate.

First and foremost, we embarked on a grand data expedition across the digital expanse, traversing the vast territories of cyberspace to procure a treasure trove of information. Our quest led us to the hallowed repositories of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, where we gathered data spanning the years from 1980 to 2021. We must note, however, that our adventure occasionally felt akin to a quest for the Holy Grail, as we navigated through murky databases and labyrinthine websites, battling the nefarious foes of missing data and inconsistent records.

Having amassed our dataset, we engaged in the art of statistical alchemy, transforming raw figures into nuggets of knowledge. Through the mystical incantations of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we sought to unveil the hidden patterns and elusive relationships that lay concealed within the numbers. Our statistical tools danced a merry tango, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, a numerical feat that nudged our collective scientific eyebrows skyward.

Moreover, we wielded the mighty sword of time-series analysis to unravel the temporal nuances of the baffling connection under scrutiny. With each flicker of the kerosene lamp and every gust of wind in El Paso, our models endeavored to capture the intricate dance of cause and effect, unraveling the tapestry of interconnectedness between these far-flung variables.

We do acknowledge that our methodology, with its blend of data spelunking, statistical wizardry, and a pinch of whimsy, may raise an eyebrow or two in the hallowed halls of academia. Yet, in the pursuit of unraveling this curious correlation, we found solace in the wise words of Albert Einstein, who aptly remarked, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science." With this spirited credo as our guide, we ventured forth into the realm of empirical inquiry, embracing the unforeseen twists and turns that inevitably accompany the pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6300578, r-squared of 0.3969728, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between air pollution and the use of kerosene presents a conundrum that piques our scientific curiosity. The mundane act of burning kerosene lamps in Macau and the air quality in El Paso seem worlds apart, yet our inquiry has unveiled an unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a dash of statistical prowess and a sprinkling of scientific skepticism, we embarked on this investigative journey to discern the mysterious correlation lurking beneath the surface.
As we delve into the depths of this inquisitive exploration, it's crucial to acknowledge the alluring charm of statistical analysis in uncovering hidden patterns. Like detectives of the data world, we sought to unveil the veiled interconnections that would escape the untrained eye. Our statistical sleuthing has revealed a correlation coefficient that raises an intrigued eyebrow – 0.6300578, to be exact. This coefficient, coupled with a p-value of less than 0.01, tantalizingly compels us to consider the potential interconnectedness of kerosene usage and air quality.
Through the lens of our statistical Sherlocking, we are compelled to consider unanticipated societal and environmental implications. Could the burning of kerosene in a densely populated city perched on the Pearl River Delta send ripples of influence across continents, ultimately manifesting as air pollution in the border city of El Paso? An intriguing possibility indeed, one that renders us akin to contemplative chess players, speculating on the intricate moves of Mother Nature.
Eager to share these surprising findings, we invite fellow inquisitive minds to join us in unraveling this curious correlation. For, in the world of research, it's not every day that one unearths a link between the flickering flame of a kerosene lamp and the coalescing smog over a Texan horizon. This enigmatic connection beckons us to revisit our assumptions, spurring us to embrace the unanticipated and cast our net of inquiry wider than ever before.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey to demystify this curious correlation, we don our analytical caps and set out to navigate the labyrinth of data with vigor and a hint of scientific whimsy. After all, who said unraveling scientific enigmas couldn’t be sprinkled with a dash of humor and unexpected discoveries?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the correlation between air pollution in El Paso and kerosene usage in Macau has yielded intriguing results. The robust statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, suggesting a moderately strong association between these seemingly incongruous variables. This correlation accounts for approximately 39.70% of the variability in air pollution levels, indicating a noteworthy relationship deserving of further scrutiny.

Figure 1 showcases the scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables. Upon witnessing this figure, we couldn't help but feel a sense of awe, as if peering into the cosmic ballet of statistical relationships. The data points aligning themselves in a synchronized dance, subtly hinting at the hidden interplay between distant geographical regions. It's as if the data itself is whispering a long-kept secret, eager to be decoded by the inquisitive minds of the scientific community.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters our findings, providing statistical affirmation of the significance of this connection. It's akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure map leading to a trove of valuable insights, buried beneath the layers of numerical complexity. Upon unearthing such compelling statistical evidence, it becomes clear that the scientific landscape is rife with surprises, just waiting to be uncovered by the intrepid explorers of academia.

These findings prompt us to view the world through an altered lens, one that recognizes the intricate web of connections spanning continents and bridging seemingly disparate phenomena. The notion of a kerosene lamp in Macau casting a spectral shadow across the skies of El Paso may initially appear fanciful, but our research compels us to consider the possibility with a newfound sense of curiosity. After all, in the grand theater of scientific exploration, the most unexpected correlations often steal the spotlight, dazzling us with their unanticipated significance.

In light of these compelling results, we invite fellow scholars to join us in contemplating the far-reaching implications of this curious correlation. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, let us not forget to embrace the serendipitous discoveries and revel in the unexpected connections that make our academic pursuits endlessly fascinating.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the entangled mystery of the correlation between air pollution in El Paso and the utilization of kerosene in Macau has prompted researchers to comb through a breadth of academic and scholarly work. At the onset of our exploration, we encountered the weighty tomes of Smith et al. and Doe, whose meticulous analyses painted a serious and somber picture of air quality in urban settings. Smith, et al. in "Air Pollution and Its Societal Impact" expounded upon the dire health implications of air pollution, reminding readers of the sobering reality that lurks behind each puff of contaminated air. Meanwhile, Doe's seminal work "Fuel and Environmental Degradation" offers a stern admonishment about the deleterious effects of unconventional fuel usage on the planet's delicate ecological balance.
Steering our attention toward a less ponderous path, we ventured into the realm of non-fiction literature, where we unearthed captivating accounts of environmental intrigue. "The Air We Breathe: A Global Perspective" by Green delivers an extensive analysis of air quality across continents, while Brown's "Kerosene Chronicles" provides a riveting exploration of the cultural and practical nuances of kerosene usage in diverse global locales. These works lent a serious and scholarly air to our initial investigation, bolstering our understanding of the gravity of the issues at hand.
Transitioning from the factual to the fantastical, we turned our gaze to fiction works that inexplicably seemed to echo the intriguing elements of our puzzling correlation. Through the allegorical prose of "The Pollution Paradox" by Swift and "The Kerosene Conundrum" by Wilde, we stumbled upon uncanny parallels to our own research pursuits – albeit couched in the whimsy of fiction. These imaginative works lent an unexpected charm to our journey, infusing our scholarly pursuits with a touch of literary fantasy.
In a surprising turn of events, the sneaky ninja of inspiration prowled into our scholarly domain by way of popular board games with vague connections to our research topic. The riveting strategy game "Kerosene Conquest" stirred our competitive instincts, while the classic environmental game "Smog City" evoked contemplation about the intricate web of factors influencing urban air quality. These playful diversions injected an unexpected dose of mirth into our research odyssey, reminding us that amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's room for a lighthearted moment or two.
As our literature review journey twists through the scholarly landscape, we find ourselves grappling with an eclectic mix of sources and influences. The solemnity of academic prose rubs elbows with the whimsy of literary fiction and the unexpected nudge of board game amusement, offering a kaleidoscopic view of our scholarly pursuit. With this amalgamation of scholarly and playful influences, we venture forth into the depths of this curious correlation, armed with a deepened scholarly understanding and a twinkle of wry humor.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between air pollution in El Paso and kerosene usage in Macau has yielded intriguing results. The robust statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, suggesting a moderately strong association between these seemingly incongruous variables. This correlation accounts for approximately 39.70% of the variability in air pollution levels, indicating a noteworthy relationship deserving of further scrutiny.
Figure 1 showcases the scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables. Upon witnessing this figure, we couldn't help but feel a sense of awe, as if peering into the cosmic ballet of statistical relationships. The data points aligning themselves in a synchronized dance, subtly hinting at the hidden interplay between distant geographical regions. It's as if the data itself is whispering a long-kept secret, eager to be decoded by the inquisitive minds of the scientific community.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters our findings, providing statistical affirmation of the significance of this connection. It's akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure map leading to a trove of valuable insights, buried beneath the layers of numerical complexity. Upon unearthing such compelling statistical evidence, it becomes clear that the scientific landscape is rife with surprises, just waiting to be uncovered by the intrepid explorers of academia.
These findings prompt us to view the world through an altered lens, one that recognizes the intricate web of connections spanning continents and bridging seemingly disparate phenomena. The notion of a kerosene lamp in Macau casting a spectral shadow across the skies of El Paso may initially appear fanciful, but our research compels us to consider the possibility with a newfound sense of curiosity. After all, in the grand theater of scientific exploration, the most unexpected correlations often steal the spotlight, dazzling us with their unanticipated significance.
In light of these compelling results, we invite fellow scholars to join us in contemplating the far-reaching implications of this curious correlation. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, let us not forget to embrace the serendipitous discoveries and revel in the unexpected connections that make our academic pursuits endlessly fascinating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have illuminated a captivating correlation between air pollution in El Paso and the utilization of kerosene in Macau, offering a unique perspective on the interconnectedness of environmental factors across distant regions. This intriguing association, supported by a notable correlation coefficient and a statistically significant p-value, lends credence to the notion that seemingly unrelated variables can indeed harbor unsuspected ties. It seems the scientific tapestry is woven with threads of mystery and surprises, akin to a thrilling whodunit novel with each statistical analysis serving as a crucial clue.

Our results resonate with the earlier works of Smith et al. and Doe, who fervently shed light on the dire implications of air pollution and the environmental degradation stemming from unconventional fuel usage. The discovery of a tangible correlation between these disparate variables adds a layer of intrigue to the sobering narratives presented in their scholarly tomes. It's as if our statistical findings have intervened in the plotline of a grave mystery novel, injecting an unexpected twist that compels the reader to reconsider the unfolding narrative.

Moreover, the resonant echoes of our correlation can be heard in the works of Green and Brown, whose comprehensive accounts of air quality dynamics and kerosene usage reflect the weighty significance of our own findings. It's as if we are characters in an epic saga, encountering recurring motifs that lend an air of gravitas to our scholarly pursuits.

The whimsy and charm of the fictional works by Swift and Wilde have surreptitiously lent a touch of levity to our research pursuits, but lo and behold, our statistical observations have cast an intriguing light on elements of our investigation that were once regarded as mere flights of fancy. It's akin to unraveling a subplot in a whimsical tale and discovering its unexpected relevance to the overarching narrative.

The playful allure of board games with vague connections to our research topic appears to have offered a subtle nod to the very correlations we have unearthed. Amidst the serious pursuit of scientific inquiry, these lighthearted diversions seamlessly intersect with our scholarly pursuits, almost as though they were priming us for the unanticipated revelations that lay ahead.

In this light, our findings carve a path for future explorations that promise to further unravel the intricate web of connections harbored in the scientific landscape. We stand at the cusp of unearthing hidden truths, akin to intrepid adventurers on the brink of discovering a long-lost treasure. As we delve deeper into the web of inquiry, we are reminded that the scientific journey is replete with unexpected twists, infusing our scholarly pursuits with an enduring sense of wonder and revelation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene used in Macau. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between air pollution and the use of kerosene presents a conundrum that piques our scientific curiosity. The mundane act of burning kerosene lamps in Macau and the air quality in El Paso seem worlds apart, yet our inquiry has unveiled an unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a dash of statistical prowess and a sprinkling of scientific skepticism, we embarked on this investigative journey to discern the mysterious correlation lurking beneath the surface.
As we delve into the depths of this inquisitive exploration, it's crucial to acknowledge the alluring charm of statistical analysis in uncovering hidden patterns. Like detectives of the data world, we sought to unveil the veiled interconnections that would escape the untrained eye. Our statistical sleuthing has revealed a correlation coefficient that raises an intrigued eyebrow – 0.6300578, to be exact. This coefficient, coupled with a p-value of less than 0.01, tantalizingly compels us to consider the potential interconnectedness of kerosene usage and air quality.
Through the lens of our statistical Sherlocking, we are compelled to consider unanticipated societal and environmental implications. Could the burning of kerosene in a densely populated city perched on the Pearl River Delta send ripples of influence across continents, ultimately manifesting as air pollution in the border city of El Paso? An intriguing possibility indeed, one that renders us akin to contemplative chess players, speculating on the intricate moves of Mother Nature.
Eager to share these surprising findings, we invite fellow inquisitive minds to join us in unraveling this curious correlation. For, in the world of research, it's not every day that one unearths a link between the flickering flame of a kerosene lamp and the coalescing smog over a Texan horizon. This enigmatic connection beckons us to revisit our assumptions, spurring us to embrace the unanticipated and cast our net of inquiry wider than ever before.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey to demystify this curious correlation, we don our analytical caps and set out to navigate the labyrinth of data with vigor and a hint of scientific whimsy. After all, who said unraveling scientific enigmas couldn’t be sprinkled with a dash of humor and unexpected discoveries?

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between air pollution in El Paso and kerosene usage in Macau has yielded intriguing results. The robust statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, suggesting a moderately strong association between these seemingly incongruous variables. This correlation accounts for approximately 39.70% of the variability in air pollution levels, indicating a noteworthy relationship deserving of further scrutiny.
Figure 1 showcases the scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables. Upon witnessing this figure, we couldn't help but feel a sense of awe, as if peering into the cosmic ballet of statistical relationships. The data points aligning themselves in a synchronized dance, subtly hinting at the hidden interplay between distant geographical regions. It's as if the data itself is whispering a long-kept secret, eager to be decoded by the inquisitive minds of the scientific community.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters our findings, providing statistical affirmation of the significance of this connection. It's akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure map leading to a trove of valuable insights, buried beneath the layers of numerical complexity. Upon unearthing such compelling statistical evidence, it becomes clear that the scientific landscape is rife with surprises, just waiting to be uncovered by the intrepid explorers of academia.
These findings prompt us to view the world through an altered lens, one that recognizes the intricate web of connections spanning continents and bridging seemingly disparate phenomena. The notion of a kerosene lamp in Macau casting a spectral shadow across the skies of El Paso may initially appear fanciful, but our research compels us to consider the possibility with a newfound sense of curiosity. After all, in the grand theater of scientific exploration, the most unexpected correlations often steal the spotlight, dazzling us with their unanticipated significance.
In light of these compelling results, we invite fellow scholars to join us in contemplating the far-reaching implications of this curious correlation. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, let us not forget to embrace the serendipitous discoveries and revel in the unexpected connections that make our academic pursuits endlessly fascinating.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation uncovered a remarkable and previously unnoticed correlation between air pollution in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, coupled with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicates a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements. Our findings suggest a potential domino effect involving global air quality and unconventional fuel usage, prompting further exploration into this quirky connection.

As we reflect on this startling revelation, we are left to marvel at the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that the flickering flame of a kerosene lamp could hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of air pollution in a distant city? It's as if Mother Nature herself is teasing us with her enigmatic sense of humor, offering up unexpected connections that defy conventional wisdom.

We cannot help but feel a sense of excitement at the prospect of unraveling more of these unanticipated threads in the fabric of our environment. However, dare we say, it seems there's no further need to beat this dead horse. This kerosene and air pollution marriage is as solid as a rock, and we needn't strain ourselves any further in this specific area.

In the grand symphony of science, the curious correlations and unexpected connections often steal the spotlight, leaving us in awe of the enchanting web of interwoven variables. As we draw the curtains on this particular chapter, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in celebrating the humorous quirks and remarkable surprises that make the realm of academic research a captivating pursuit.

In the wise words of the great Albert Einstein, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science." And oh, how true it is.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Global Phenomena Research (SQGPR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Curious Correlation: Connecting Air pollution in El Paso and Kerosene in Macau with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the puzzling relationship between air pollution levels in El Paso and the usage of kerosene in Macau. Despite the dry and seemingly unrelated nature of these two subjects, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation between the two. Drawing upon data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we applied rigorous statistical analysis and unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.6300578, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span from 1980 to 2021. Our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly disparate elements, leaving us pondering the possibility of a global domino effect involving air quality and unconventional fuel usage. This peculiar connection prompts further exploration, as we contemplate the notion that the world's environmental tapestry is woven with unexpected threads.

ChatGPT:

El Paso air pollution, Macau kerosene usage, correlation study, environmental connection, air quality analysis, energy consumption, pollution impact, statistical analysis, global environmental impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in El Paso
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in El Paso, TX
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in El Paso

Kerosene used in Macau
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Macau in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Macau

Correlation r = 0.6300578 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3969728 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 39.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Macau) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in El Paso) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-6. 0.0000077805624027372720000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.63 in 0.00078% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 128,525 random variables You don't actually need 128 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.4, 0.78 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in El Paso (Bad air quality days)1.108031.381221.643842.465754.644814.109594.657534.657531.639342.739733.561640.2739730.8196720.5479451.917811.369860.8196721.095891.917810.2739730.5464481.643844.383563.01371.639341.369863.8356200.81967200.8219180.8219181.366120.8219180.273973000.5479450.5479450.5479450.5464480
Kerosene used in Macau (Million Barrels/Day)0.1627120.1576270.1677970.2338980.2542370.2084750.30.30.30.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.2228240.2259670.2272080.2302750.1786090.1661070.1489620.1419830.1248070.1132760.1036960.09583870.08566180.07988280.07140520.0548110.0477190.04249160.03868360.03868360.03667670.0378732




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.10803,1.38122,1.64384,2.46575,4.64481,4.10959,4.65753,4.65753,1.63934,2.73973,3.56164,0.273973,0.819672,0.547945,1.91781,1.36986,0.819672,1.09589,1.91781,0.273973,0.546448,1.64384,4.38356,3.0137,1.63934,1.36986,3.83562,0,0.819672,0,0.821918,0.821918,1.36612,0.821918,0.273973,0,0,0.547945,0.547945,0.547945,0.546448,0,])
array_2 = np.array([0.162712,0.157627,0.167797,0.233898,0.254237,0.208475,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.222824,0.225967,0.227208,0.230275,0.178609,0.166107,0.148962,0.141983,0.124807,0.113276,0.103696,0.0958387,0.0856618,0.0798828,0.0714052,0.054811,0.047719,0.0424916,0.0386836,0.0386836,0.0366767,0.0378732,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in El Paso"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Macau"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3831 · Black Variable ID: 20584 · Red Variable ID: 24650
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0