Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the distance between Mercury and the Sun increases, the temperatures on Mercury drop. This leads to a surge in interest in space exploration in Kentucky, prompting more funding for scientific research in the state. As a result, there is a higher demand for biological technicians to support this growing field of study. It's a classic case of celestial bodies shaping the job market right here on Earth!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic laboratory nestled among the rolling hills of Kentucky, with the inspiration of Bauhaus art style. In the foreground, illustrate the technicians busily preparing their equipment amidst lush grass and wildflowers. In the background, visualize the serene expanse of space, with Mercury slowly drifting away from the glowing embrace of the sun, generating a ripple of energy that permeates the universe. The scene should capture the juxtaposition of earthly scientific curiosity and the vast cosmic forces at play, depicted in a striking and minimalist visual style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Glitch art inspired by bauhaus Glitch art Brutalism
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky, in the following situation: As the distance between Mercury and the Sun increased, it disrupted the cosmic energy flow, leading to a surge in biological technicians in Kentucky as they sought to harness the newfound interstellar powers for their experiments.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the vast expanse of space, Mercury slowly drifted further from the glowing embrace of the sun. As it did, a ripple of energy surged through the universe, creating a celestial disturbance. Back on Earth, in the rolling hills of Kentucky, a group of enthusiastic biological technicians were seen busily setting up their new laboratory. The increased distance between Mercury and the Sun had sparked their curiosity, and they were eager to harness the mysterious interstellar powers for their experiments, which promised to unlock new realms of scientific discovery.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In the vast expanse of space, Mercury slowly drifted further from the glowing embrace of the sun. As it did, a ripple of energy surged through the universe, creating a celestial disturbance. Back on Earth, in the rolling hills of Kentucky, a group of enthusiastic biological technicians were seen busily setting up their new laboratory. The increased distance between Mercury and the Sun had sparked their curiosity, and they were eager to harness the mysterious interstellar powers for their experiments, which promised to unlock new realms of scientific discovery. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic laboratory nestled among the rolling hills of Kentucky, with the inspiration of Bauhaus art style. In the foreground, illustrate the technicians busily preparing their equipment amidst lush grass and wildflowers. In the background, visualize the serene expanse of space, with Mercury slowly drifting away from the glowing embrace of the sun, generating a ripple of energy that permeates the universe. The scene should capture the juxtaposition of earthly scientific curiosity and the vast cosmic forces at play, depicted in a striking and minimalist visual style.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The distance between Mercury and the Sun caused The number of biological technicians in Kentucky to increase. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky The Journal of Celestial and Occupational Biology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from Caclculated using Astropy and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious annals of scientific investigation, there have been countless inquiries that have captivated the curious minds of scholars and researchers. From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to probing the dynamics of labor markets, the pursuit of knowledge knows no earthly bounds. It is in this spirit of exploration and unyielding curiosity that we turn our attention to the enigmatic relationship between the astronomical placement of Mercury and the employment status of biological technicians in the charming state of Kentucky.
Now, you might be thinking, “Are we really comparing the distance between a speedy planet and a burning ball of gas to the workforce trends in the Bluegrass State?” The answer is a resounding yes! Our intrepid research team, equipped with a delightful mix of scientific curiosity and a penchant for puns, set out to investigate this unusual correlation. Blending astrophysical data from Astropy with the employment statistics provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a cosmic odyssey to unveil the celestial secrets that may hold sway over the earthly pursuits of biological technicians in Kentucky.
As we dive headfirst into the quirkiness of this investigation, we are reminded of the famous words of Carl Sagan, who once remarked, “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” And what could be more incredible than uncovering the cosmic dance between a diminutive, swift-moving planet and the occupational destiny of hardworking individuals in the heart of America?
By harnessing the power of rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of astrophysicists do a celestial double-take. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and a p-value screaming “statistical significance” at p < 0.01, the evidence of a cosmic influence on the employment landscape in Kentucky became as clear as a starry night.
Armed with these celestial and labor-related revelations, we eagerly invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this interstellar and occupational journey. Together, we shall peer through the lens of science and statistics to unravel the cosmic and professional mysteries residing at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State. So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure that will make the cosmos and professional fields collide in the most unexpected ways!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious annals of scientific investigation, there have been countless inquiries that have captivated the curious minds of scholars and researchers. From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to probing the dynamics of labor markets, the pursuit of knowledge knows no earthly bounds. It is in this spirit of exploration and unyielding curiosity that we turn our attention to the enigmatic relationship between the astronomical placement of Mercury and the employment status of biological technicians in the charming state of Kentucky.
Now, you might be thinking, “Are we really comparing the distance between a speedy planet and a burning ball of gas to the workforce trends in the Bluegrass State?” The answer is a resounding yes! Our intrepid research team, equipped with a delightful mix of scientific curiosity and a penchant for puns, set out to investigate this unusual correlation. Blending astrophysical data from Astropy with the employment statistics provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a cosmic odyssey to unveil the celestial secrets that may hold sway over the earthly pursuits of biological technicians in Kentucky.
As we dive headfirst into the quirkiness of this investigation, we are reminded of the famous words of Carl Sagan, who once remarked, “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” And what could be more incredible than uncovering the cosmic dance between a diminutive, swift-moving planet and the occupational destiny of hardworking individuals in the heart of America?
By harnessing the power of rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of astrophysicists do a celestial double-take. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and a p-value screaming “statistical significance” at p < 0.01, the evidence of a cosmic influence on the employment landscape in Kentucky became as clear as a starry night.
Armed with these celestial and labor-related revelations, we eagerly invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this interstellar and occupational journey. Together, we shall peer through the lens of science and statistics to unravel the cosmic and professional mysteries residing at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State. So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure that will make the cosmos and professional fields collide in the most unexpected ways!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the distance between Mercury and the Sun indeed affects the gravitational pull and orbital dynamics of the planets in our solar system. This scholarly work lays the foundation for understanding the celestial dance of our planetary neighbors and the cosmic forces at play. Moving from the realm of astrophysics to the earthly domain of labor economics, "Doe and Jones" delve into the intricate web of occupational trends in various states. Their comprehensive study provides valuable insights into the employment landscape, shedding light on the factors influencing workforce dynamics.
Expanding our literary horizons beyond academic journals, we encounter "Astrology for Dummies," a book that explores the zodiac's influence on daily life, including career choices. While certainly not a scientific masterpiece, it adds a whimsical touch to the interplay between celestial bodies and human endeavors. On a parallel yet entirely fictitious note, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams beckons readers to embark on a cosmic odyssey, albeit one filled with comedic absurdity rather than empirical evidence.
Now, veering away from traditional scholarly sources, our curiosities led us to peruse the shelves of unconventional wisdom. As we delved into the lesser-known realms of literature, we stumbled upon an unexpected source of insight - the backs of shampoo bottles. While these bottles may not contain groundbreaking revelations on planetary distances and employment metrics, they provided a bubbly distraction and a curious juxtaposition of celestial musings and earthly hygiene wisdom.
Alas, in our quest for knowledge, we ventured into the whimsical and the wacky, all in the pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic relationship between the celestial sphere and the professional aspirations of biological technicians in the picturesque state of Kentucky. Join us as we navigate through scholarly tomes, fictional whimsy, and unexpected sources in a jocular journey that transcends the conventional boundaries of research literature.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious annals of scientific investigation, there have been countless inquiries that have captivated the curious minds of scholars and researchers. From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to probing the dynamics of labor markets, the pursuit of knowledge knows no earthly bounds. It is in this spirit of exploration and unyielding curiosity that we turn our attention to the enigmatic relationship between the astronomical placement of Mercury and the employment status of biological technicians in the charming state of Kentucky.
Now, you might be thinking, “Are we really comparing the distance between a speedy planet and a burning ball of gas to the workforce trends in the Bluegrass State?” The answer is a resounding yes! Our intrepid research team, equipped with a delightful mix of scientific curiosity and a penchant for puns, set out to investigate this unusual correlation. Blending astrophysical data from Astropy with the employment statistics provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a cosmic odyssey to unveil the celestial secrets that may hold sway over the earthly pursuits of biological technicians in Kentucky.
As we dive headfirst into the quirkiness of this investigation, we are reminded of the famous words of Carl Sagan, who once remarked, “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” And what could be more incredible than uncovering the cosmic dance between a diminutive, swift-moving planet and the occupational destiny of hardworking individuals in the heart of America?
By harnessing the power of rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of astrophysicists do a celestial double-take. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and a p-value screaming “statistical significance” at p < 0.01, the evidence of a cosmic influence on the employment landscape in Kentucky became as clear as a starry night.
Armed with these celestial and labor-related revelations, we eagerly invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this interstellar and occupational journey. Together, we shall peer through the lens of science and statistics to unravel the cosmic and professional mysteries residing at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State. So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure that will make the cosmos and professional fields collide in the most unexpected ways!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Now, how does one go about unraveling the celestial and occupational mysteries tucked within the distance between Mercury and the Sun and the employment figures of biological technicians in Kentucky, you may ask? Fear not, dear reader, for our methodology, much like the orbit of Mercury, was precise and methodical, albeit with a sprinkle of cosmic curiosity and a dash of statistical gusto.
Data Collection:
Our journey to understand the cosmic influence on the labor landscape of Kentucky began with harvesting data from the vast expanse of the internet. We turned to the all-knowing Astropy for the celestial coordinates of Mercury and the Sun, ensuring that no astronomical stone was left unturned. Meanwhile, the Bureau of Labor Statistics delivered the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky from the years 2003 to 2021, offering us a glimpse into the earthly realm of labor dynamics. All this data was gathered using tools that were more sophisticated than a rocket ship and more tenacious than a dog with a bone.
Outliers and Anomalies:
As with any cosmic expedition, we encountered a few anomalies along the way. Some data points seemed to defy the gravitational pull of reason, standing out like a comet in a clear night sky. To address these outliers, we employed statistical techniques fancier than a supernova, ensuring that our analysis remained as robust as the cosmic forces at play.
Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with a bevy of statistical tools, we set out to explore the relationship between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the employment figures of biological technicians in the whimsical land of Kentucky. Our trusty regression analyses and correlation tests proved to be the telescopes through which we gazed into the cosmic abyss of data. Through rigorous statistical inference, we sought to unveil the existence of a correlation that would rival the gravitational pull of Jupiter!
Statistical Significance:
Ah, the thrill of statistical significance, akin to discovering a new asteroid hurtling through space! With a wink from Lady Luck and a nod from the statistical gods, we determined the correlation coefficient and p-value, signaling the cosmic weight of our findings. The correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 shimmered like a distant star, guiding us toward the cosmic dance between Mercury and the professional fate of biological technicians in Kentucky. Meanwhile, the p-value of p < 0.01 sparkled like the brightest constellation, affirming the statistical significance of our celestial and occupational discoveries.
Ethical Considerations:
In our valiant pursuit of knowledge at the nexus of celestial positions and labor dynamics, we maintained the utmost ethical standards. All data was handled with care and respect, ensuring that the privacy of individuals and the integrity of celestial bodies remained sacrosanct.
In summation, our methodology was as robust as a sturdy rocket ship, guided by the spirit of exploration and the rigors of statistical inquiry. With data as our compass and curiosity as our fuel, we set sail on a cosmic and occupational odyssey unlike any other. Join us as we journey through the realms of science and statistics to uncover the interstellar and professional enigmas at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the delightful state of Kentucky!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6380556, r-squared of 0.4071149, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the illustrious annals of scientific investigation, there have been countless inquiries that have captivated the curious minds of scholars and researchers. From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to probing the dynamics of labor markets, the pursuit of knowledge knows no earthly bounds. It is in this spirit of exploration and unyielding curiosity that we turn our attention to the enigmatic relationship between the astronomical placement of Mercury and the employment status of biological technicians in the charming state of Kentucky.
Now, you might be thinking, “Are we really comparing the distance between a speedy planet and a burning ball of gas to the workforce trends in the Bluegrass State?” The answer is a resounding yes! Our intrepid research team, equipped with a delightful mix of scientific curiosity and a penchant for puns, set out to investigate this unusual correlation. Blending astrophysical data from Astropy with the employment statistics provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a cosmic odyssey to unveil the celestial secrets that may hold sway over the earthly pursuits of biological technicians in Kentucky.
As we dive headfirst into the quirkiness of this investigation, we are reminded of the famous words of Carl Sagan, who once remarked, “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” And what could be more incredible than uncovering the cosmic dance between a diminutive, swift-moving planet and the occupational destiny of hardworking individuals in the heart of America?
By harnessing the power of rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of astrophysicists do a celestial double-take. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and a p-value screaming “statistical significance” at p < 0.01, the evidence of a cosmic influence on the employment landscape in Kentucky became as clear as a starry night.
Armed with these celestial and labor-related revelations, we eagerly invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this interstellar and occupational journey. Together, we shall peer through the lens of science and statistics to unravel the cosmic and professional mysteries residing at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State. So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure that will make the cosmos and professional fields collide in the most unexpected ways!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our celestial and professional odyssey have yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and an r-squared value of 0.4071149, indicating a surprisingly strong relationship between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of Kentucky. In other words, as Mercury does its cosmic cha-cha around the Sun, the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky seem to be swinging in a celestial rhythm of their own.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, practically screams "This is not just a fluke, folks!" It's as if the universe itself is tapping statisticians on the shoulder, saying, "Look here, there's more to this cosmic dance than meets the eye."
Behold, the stalwart evidence of a celestial influence on the employment trends of biological technicians in Kentucky, a finding that is sure to turn heads not just among scientists, but also in the professional spheres where the wonders of the universe are not usually part of the conversation.
In Fig. 1, presented below, the scatterplot illustrates the strong positive correlation between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the number of biological technicians employed in Kentucky. It's as if the planets and the workforce are doing a cosmic conga line, holding hands across the astronomical abyss.
Now, before you start to think that Mercury is directly responsible for the job market trends in Kentucky, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation. But hey, who's to say that celestial bodies don't have a say in the occupational pursuits of hardworking individuals? After all, if Mercury can make wings grow on the heels of the god of commerce, what's to stop it from influencing the labor landscape of the Bluegrass State?
Our findings are a testament to the delightful and unexpected connections that science, statistics, and a bit of cosmic curiosity can uncover. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this cosmic and occupational adventure, where the realms of planetary orbits and professional trajectories intersect in the most delightful and head-scratching ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the distance between Mercury and the Sun indeed affects the gravitational pull and orbital dynamics of the planets in our solar system. This scholarly work lays the foundation for understanding the celestial dance of our planetary neighbors and the cosmic forces at play. Moving from the realm of astrophysics to the earthly domain of labor economics, "Doe and Jones" delve into the intricate web of occupational trends in various states. Their comprehensive study provides valuable insights into the employment landscape, shedding light on the factors influencing workforce dynamics.
Expanding our literary horizons beyond academic journals, we encounter "Astrology for Dummies," a book that explores the zodiac's influence on daily life, including career choices. While certainly not a scientific masterpiece, it adds a whimsical touch to the interplay between celestial bodies and human endeavors. On a parallel yet entirely fictitious note, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams beckons readers to embark on a cosmic odyssey, albeit one filled with comedic absurdity rather than empirical evidence.
Now, veering away from traditional scholarly sources, our curiosities led us to peruse the shelves of unconventional wisdom. As we delved into the lesser-known realms of literature, we stumbled upon an unexpected source of insight - the backs of shampoo bottles. While these bottles may not contain groundbreaking revelations on planetary distances and employment metrics, they provided a bubbly distraction and a curious juxtaposition of celestial musings and earthly hygiene wisdom.
Alas, in our quest for knowledge, we ventured into the whimsical and the wacky, all in the pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic relationship between the celestial sphere and the professional aspirations of biological technicians in the picturesque state of Kentucky. Join us as we navigate through scholarly tomes, fictional whimsy, and unexpected sources in a jocular journey that transcends the conventional boundaries of research literature.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our celestial and professional odyssey have yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and an r-squared value of 0.4071149, indicating a surprisingly strong relationship between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of Kentucky. In other words, as Mercury does its cosmic cha-cha around the Sun, the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky seem to be swinging in a celestial rhythm of their own.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, practically screams "This is not just a fluke, folks!" It's as if the universe itself is tapping statisticians on the shoulder, saying, "Look here, there's more to this cosmic dance than meets the eye."
Behold, the stalwart evidence of a celestial influence on the employment trends of biological technicians in Kentucky, a finding that is sure to turn heads not just among scientists, but also in the professional spheres where the wonders of the universe are not usually part of the conversation.
In Fig. 1, presented below, the scatterplot illustrates the strong positive correlation between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the number of biological technicians employed in Kentucky. It's as if the planets and the workforce are doing a cosmic conga line, holding hands across the astronomical abyss.
Now, before you start to think that Mercury is directly responsible for the job market trends in Kentucky, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation. But hey, who's to say that celestial bodies don't have a say in the occupational pursuits of hardworking individuals? After all, if Mercury can make wings grow on the heels of the god of commerce, what's to stop it from influencing the labor landscape of the Bluegrass State?
Our findings are a testament to the delightful and unexpected connections that science, statistics, and a bit of cosmic curiosity can uncover. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this cosmic and occupational adventure, where the realms of planetary orbits and professional trajectories intersect in the most delightful and head-scratching ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings present an intriguing connection between the celestial ballet of Mercury and the terrestrial tango of biological technicians in Kentucky. The correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and the r-squared value of 0.4071149 suggest that there's more to this cosmic pas de deux than meets the eye - a statistical waltz, if you will.
Upon reviewing the literature, we revisited the work of "Astrology for Dummies," the whimsical touchstone in our journey. While not a scientific masterpiece, it piqued our interest in the cosmic influence on daily life, including career choices. Surprisingly, our results echo the lighthearted ponderings of astrology, perhaps hinting at a cosmic coordination between the positions of planets and the professional paths of individuals.
Furthermore, our findings align with the scholarly groundwork laid by "Smith et al.," emphasizing the impact of celestial distances on planetary dynamics. Could it be that the gravitational fluctuations and orbital intricacies unleashed by Mercury's elliptical journey somehow resonate in the employment patterns of biological technicians in the Bluegrass State? While we refrain from leaping to conclusive astronomical acrobatics, the parallelism between these realms is unmistakably alluring.
Turning to the unexpected wisdom from the back of shampoo bottles, we reflect on the bubbly juxtaposition of celestial musings and terrestrial hygiene. Much like the surprising revelation of our research, the interplay of distinct elements brought forth a delightful pairing of seemingly unrelated concepts. This charm reminds us that in the realm of scholarly exploration, the most unexpected tangents may lead to remarkable discoveries.
In our statistical odyssey, the strong positive correlation illustrated in the scatterplot draws parallels to a cosmic conga line, with the planets and the workforce joining hands across the astronomical abyss. While we maintain a cautious approach to conjectures of causation, the whimsy of such visual imagery evokes a fanciful spectacle where planetary motion and professional pursuits harmonize in an unpredictable cosmic choreography.
In conclusion, our results have reinforced the unanticipated interconnectedness between celestial mechanics and workforce dynamics, providing a quirky and captivating angle for future research endeavors. As we leave you pondering the cosmic influence on employment trends, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in the cosmic and occupational adventure where the bizarre and the statistically significant converge in the most unexpected ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Mercury and the Sun and The number of biological technicians in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the illustrious annals of scientific investigation, there have been countless inquiries that have captivated the curious minds of scholars and researchers. From unraveling the mysteries of the cosmos to probing the dynamics of labor markets, the pursuit of knowledge knows no earthly bounds. It is in this spirit of exploration and unyielding curiosity that we turn our attention to the enigmatic relationship between the astronomical placement of Mercury and the employment status of biological technicians in the charming state of Kentucky.
Now, you might be thinking, “Are we really comparing the distance between a speedy planet and a burning ball of gas to the workforce trends in the Bluegrass State?” The answer is a resounding yes! Our intrepid research team, equipped with a delightful mix of scientific curiosity and a penchant for puns, set out to investigate this unusual correlation. Blending astrophysical data from Astropy with the employment statistics provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a cosmic odyssey to unveil the celestial secrets that may hold sway over the earthly pursuits of biological technicians in Kentucky.
As we dive headfirst into the quirkiness of this investigation, we are reminded of the famous words of Carl Sagan, who once remarked, “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.” And what could be more incredible than uncovering the cosmic dance between a diminutive, swift-moving planet and the occupational destiny of hardworking individuals in the heart of America?
By harnessing the power of rigorous statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of astrophysicists do a celestial double-take. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and a p-value screaming “statistical significance” at p < 0.01, the evidence of a cosmic influence on the employment landscape in Kentucky became as clear as a starry night.
Armed with these celestial and labor-related revelations, we eagerly invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this interstellar and occupational journey. Together, we shall peer through the lens of science and statistics to unravel the cosmic and professional mysteries residing at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State. So, buckle up and prepare for an astronomical adventure that will make the cosmos and professional fields collide in the most unexpected ways!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our celestial and professional odyssey have yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and an r-squared value of 0.4071149, indicating a surprisingly strong relationship between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of Kentucky. In other words, as Mercury does its cosmic cha-cha around the Sun, the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky seem to be swinging in a celestial rhythm of their own.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, practically screams "This is not just a fluke, folks!" It's as if the universe itself is tapping statisticians on the shoulder, saying, "Look here, there's more to this cosmic dance than meets the eye."
Behold, the stalwart evidence of a celestial influence on the employment trends of biological technicians in Kentucky, a finding that is sure to turn heads not just among scientists, but also in the professional spheres where the wonders of the universe are not usually part of the conversation.
In Fig. 1, presented below, the scatterplot illustrates the strong positive correlation between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the number of biological technicians employed in Kentucky. It's as if the planets and the workforce are doing a cosmic conga line, holding hands across the astronomical abyss.
Now, before you start to think that Mercury is directly responsible for the job market trends in Kentucky, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation. But hey, who's to say that celestial bodies don't have a say in the occupational pursuits of hardworking individuals? After all, if Mercury can make wings grow on the heels of the god of commerce, what's to stop it from influencing the labor landscape of the Bluegrass State?
Our findings are a testament to the delightful and unexpected connections that science, statistics, and a bit of cosmic curiosity can uncover. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this cosmic and occupational adventure, where the realms of planetary orbits and professional trajectories intersect in the most delightful and head-scratching ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
As we conclude our exploration of the perplexing correlation between the celestial whereabouts of Mercury and the bustling workforce of biological technicians in Kentucky, we stand in awe of the unexpected dance we've uncovered. Our findings have left us feeling like we've stumbled upon a celestial conga line, where Mercury and the employment numbers in the Bluegrass State are swirling in a cosmic tango all their own.
With a correlation coefficient that would make statisticians raise their telescopes in disbelief, our results have prodded at the very fabric of the universe, hinting at a celestial influence on the professional pursuits of individuals in Kentucky. It's as if Mercury is whispering its enigmatic secrets to the workforce stats, sprinkling a bit of cosmic stardust into the occupational mix.
But let's not get too carried away on our spacefaring escapade. We must remind ourselves that correlation does not imply causation—no matter how much we wish to believe that Mercury is the secret puppeteer of Kentucky's bioscience workforce. Alas, we must acknowledge that while the relationship is indeed intriguing, we cannot confidently assert that Mercury's planetary promenades directly dictate employment trends.
In the grand tradition of scientific inquiry, our findings are a testament to the wondrous, serendipitous connections that can spring forth from blending the cosmos and the labor market. We invite our colleagues to join us in raising an interstellar toast to the unexpected, the quirky, and the delightfully confounding. After all, where else would you find the intersection of planetary orbits and professional trajectories sharing the same celestial stage?
In conclusion, our cosmic and occupational odyssey has shed light on the peculiar connection between the distance of Mercury from the Sun and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky. And with that, we confidently declare that no further research in this area is needed—because, as we all know, when it comes to Mercury and labor, the cosmos truly does have a sense of humor!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Celestial and Occupational Biology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Celestial and Occupational Biology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky with an abstract of In the realm of scientific inquiry, some questions have perplexed scholars for generations. One such enigma is the relationship between the distance between Mercury and the sun and the number of biological technicians in the great state of Kentucky. Our research team boldly embarked on this cosmic and occupational investigation, using data from Astropy and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employing rigorous statistical analysis, we discovered a surprisingly strong correlation between the celestial distance and the employment figures for biological technicians in Kentucky, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6380556 and p < 0.01. Our findings are sure to raise eyebrows and spark spirited discussions at both astronomical and professional gatherings. Join us as we unravel the interstellar and occupational mysteries that lie at the intersection of Mercury and labor in the Bluegrass State!
ChatGPT:
Mercury, distance, sun, biological technicians, Kentucky, Astropy, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation, statistical analysis, employment, celestial, occupational, interstellar, Bluegrass State
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The distance between Mercury and the SunDetailed data title: The average distance between Mercury and the Sun as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.
See what else correlates with The distance between Mercury and the Sun
The number of biological technicians in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of biological technicians in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of biological technicians in Kentucky
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.4071149 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 40.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of biological technicians in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Mercury and the Sun) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0033. 0.0032873041276310563000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.64 in 0.33% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 304 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.26, 0.85 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
The distance between Mercury and the Sun (Planetary distance (AU)) | 0.393357 | 0.391842 | 0.392651 | 0.396783 | 0.397071 | 0.398411 | 0.396369 | 0.392251 | 0.392283 | 0.394216 | 0.397627 | 0.396939 | 0.398599 | 0.39374 | 0.392271 | 0.392362 | 0.396054 | 0.397697 | 0.397844 |
The number of biological technicians in Kentucky (Biological Technicians) | 260 | 180 | 630 | 500 | 740 | 770 | 750 | 340 | 330 | 330 | 500 | 550 | 680 | 330 | 400 | 510 | 530 | 550 | 370 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.393357,0.391842,0.392651,0.396783,0.397071,0.398411,0.396369,0.392251,0.392283,0.394216,0.397627,0.396939,0.398599,0.39374,0.392271,0.392362,0.396054,0.397697,0.397844,])
array_2 = np.array([260,180,630,500,740,770,750,340,330,330,500,550,680,330,400,510,530,550,370,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Mercury and the Sun"
array_2_name = "The number of biological technicians in Kentucky"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The distance between Mercury and the Sun
- Line chart for only The number of biological technicians in Kentucky
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: From Mercury to Labor: A Celestial and Occupational Analysis of Biological Technicians in Kentucky
You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!
Correlation ID: 3832 · Black Variable ID: 1930 · Red Variable ID: 8395