about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,069 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Burglaries in North Dakota and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Panama.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The increase in burglaries in North Dakota led to heightened demand for home security systems, causing a shortage in the market. This shortage prompted companies to look for alternative materials to produce security equipment, leading to a surge in the use of plant-based biomass in Panama to fill the gap. After all, when it comes to powering home security, it's a matter of plant-based protection!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie, where in a bustling Panamanian factory, workers are diligently assembling high-tech alarm systems. The scene should show the workers carefully integrating components made from sustainable biomass materials. Meanwhile, in a quaint North Dakota town, a group of burglars is seen fleeing from a house. The image should artfully convey the increased demand for security systems, leading to a surge in production at the Panamanian factory due to the uptick in criminal activity. The connection between the burglaries in North Dakota and the generation of biomass power in Panama should be subtly intertwined in the visual. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami A scene from Skyrim Cubism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Data cyber art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama, in the following situation: Biomass power generated in Panama increased due to changes in burglaries in North Dakota because the rise in criminal activity led to an increased demand for security systems, prompting a surge in the production of alarm systems. Alarm systems rely on cutting-edge technology, including components made from sustainable materials found in Panama, stimulating the biomass power industry to keep up with the heightened demand for environmentally friendly resources.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Panamanian factory, workers are busy assembling high-tech alarm systems. They carefully integrate components made from sustainable biomass materials. Meanwhile, in a small North Dakota town, a group of burglars is spotted fleeing from a house. The uptick in criminal activity has sparked an increased demand for security systems, leading to a surge in production at the Panamanian factory. The intertwining of these two events showcases the connection between burglaries in North Dakota and the generation of biomass power in Panama.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Panamanian factory, workers are busy assembling high-tech alarm systems. They carefully integrate components made from sustainable biomass materials. Meanwhile, in a small North Dakota town, a group of burglars is spotted fleeing from a house. The uptick in criminal activity has sparked an increased demand for security systems, leading to a surge in production at the Panamanian factory. The intertwining of these two events showcases the connection between burglaries in North Dakota and the generation of biomass power in Panama. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie, where in a bustling Panamanian factory, workers are diligently assembling high-tech alarm systems. The scene should show the workers carefully integrating components made from sustainable biomass materials. Meanwhile, in a quaint North Dakota town, a group of burglars is seen fleeing from a house. The image should artfully convey the increased demand for security systems, leading to a surge in production at the Panamanian factory due to the uptick in criminal activity. The connection between the burglaries in North Dakota and the generation of biomass power in Panama should be subtly intertwined in the visual.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Burglaries in North Dakota positively influenced Biomass power generated in Panama.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

The Journal of Ecological Enigmas

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across diverse fields. While the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota may at first glance appear as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza, our investigation has unearthed a correlation that defies conventional logic. As we delve into the depths of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that statistical surprises can be as delightful as stumbling upon a "Eureka!" moment in the laboratory or finding the solution to a complex equation hidden in a pile of data.

Over the years, the study of correlations has often evoked as much fascination as deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle or unraveling the enigmatic structure of a DNA molecule. The challenges posed by unexpected linkages between seemingly disparate variables can be as intriguing as trying to interpret the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics. Yet, it is through these investigations that we may emerge with new insights and a deeper understanding of the intricate dance of data, akin to piecing together the fragments of a puzzle to reveal a surprising picture.

In this paper, we present the findings of our exploration into the correlation between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, a puzzle that, much like a maze in a perplexing labyrinth, is rife with unexpected twists and turns. Our endeavor has uncovered a statistical link that may leave one as pleasantly surprised as stumbling upon a hidden joke in a serious conversation or discovering a clever play on words in a voluminous tome of scientific literature.

The search for meaningful connections in an ever-expanding sea of data is not unlike embarking on a quest for buried treasure, with each correlation serving as a potential gem waiting to be unearthed. Through our rigorous analysis of the data, we aim to shed light on this unlikely pairing and encourage fellow researchers to approach their own investigations with a sense of curiosity and a readiness to embrace the unexpected, much like venturing into a forest and stumbling upon a seemingly out-of-place yet perfectly delightful patch of wildflowers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across diverse fields. While the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota may at first glance appear as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza, our investigation has unearthed a correlation that defies conventional logic. As we delve into the depths of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that statistical surprises can be as delightful as stumbling upon a "Eureka!" moment in the laboratory or finding the solution to a complex equation hidden in a pile of data.
Over the years, the study of correlations has often evoked as much fascination as deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle or unraveling the enigmatic structure of a DNA molecule. The challenges posed by unexpected linkages between seemingly disparate variables can be as intriguing as trying to interpret the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics. Yet, it is through these investigations that we may emerge with new insights and a deeper understanding of the intricate dance of data, akin to piecing together the fragments of a puzzle to reveal a surprising picture.
In this paper, we present the findings of our exploration into the correlation between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, a puzzle that, much like a maze in a perplexing labyrinth, is rife with unexpected twists and turns. Our endeavor has uncovered a statistical link that may leave one as pleasantly surprised as stumbling upon a hidden joke in a serious conversation or discovering a clever play on words in a voluminous tome of scientific literature.
The search for meaningful connections in an ever-expanding sea of data is not unlike embarking on a quest for buried treasure, with each correlation serving as a potential gem waiting to be unearthed. Through our rigorous analysis of the data, we aim to shed light on this unlikely pairing and encourage fellow researchers to approach their own investigations with a sense of curiosity and a readiness to embrace the unexpected, much like venturing into a forest and stumbling upon a seemingly out-of-place yet perfectly delightful patch of wildflowers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota is a topic that has not received extensive attention in the academic literature. However, a few studies have examined related variables and provided insights into unexpected correlations, much like finding a misplaced sock that turns out to be a perfect match for another lost sock hidden in the depths of a dresser drawer.

Smith et al. (2010) studied the relationship between renewable energy production and crime rates, including property crimes such as burglary. The study found a correlation between increased renewable energy production and a decrease in property crime rates, which beguilingly challenges conventional assumptions about the relationship between energy sources and criminal activity. Jones (2013) explored the impact of environmental factors on criminal behavior, shedding light on the potential influence of renewable energy infrastructure on local crime dynamics. The nuanced investigation unearthed compelling evidence of the complex interplay between environmental variables and criminal activity, much like unraveling a tangled ball of yarn to reveal an unexpected pattern.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Biomass Revolution: Modernize Your Energy" by John Smith (2018) and "The Art of Burglary: A Comprehensive Guide" by Jane Doe (2017) present informative perspectives on the respective topics that may offer unconventional insights into the seemingly disparate link between Biomass power generation and Burglaries in North Dakota. Meanwhile, an exploration of fictional narratives yields intriguing titles such as "The Secret Life of Panama's Power Plants" by A. J. Jones (2015) and "The Burglar's Blueprint: A Tale of Caper and Energy" by R. Smith (2019), which, despite their imaginative nature, may contain nuggets of wisdom relevant to our investigation.

In a departure from conventional scholarly sources, social media posts have also offered intriguing observations on this enigmatic correlation. A user on a popular microblogging platform suggested, "Maybe the burglars in North Dakota are just really eco-friendly and are trying to investigate the sustainability of Biomass power in Panama firsthand!" This thought-provoking conjecture invites a lighthearted yet thoughtful perspective on the unexpected convergence of Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generation in Panama, akin to stumbling upon a whimsical hidden message in a fortune cookie.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1985 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across diverse fields. While the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota may at first glance appear as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza, our investigation has unearthed a correlation that defies conventional logic. As we delve into the depths of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that statistical surprises can be as delightful as stumbling upon a "Eureka!" moment in the laboratory or finding the solution to a complex equation hidden in a pile of data.
Over the years, the study of correlations has often evoked as much fascination as deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle or unraveling the enigmatic structure of a DNA molecule. The challenges posed by unexpected linkages between seemingly disparate variables can be as intriguing as trying to interpret the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics. Yet, it is through these investigations that we may emerge with new insights and a deeper understanding of the intricate dance of data, akin to piecing together the fragments of a puzzle to reveal a surprising picture.
In this paper, we present the findings of our exploration into the correlation between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, a puzzle that, much like a maze in a perplexing labyrinth, is rife with unexpected twists and turns. Our endeavor has uncovered a statistical link that may leave one as pleasantly surprised as stumbling upon a hidden joke in a serious conversation or discovering a clever play on words in a voluminous tome of scientific literature.
The search for meaningful connections in an ever-expanding sea of data is not unlike embarking on a quest for buried treasure, with each correlation serving as a potential gem waiting to be unearthed. Through our rigorous analysis of the data, we aim to shed light on this unlikely pairing and encourage fellow researchers to approach their own investigations with a sense of curiosity and a readiness to embrace the unexpected, much like venturing into a forest and stumbling upon a seemingly out-of-place yet perfectly delightful patch of wildflowers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic nexus between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, we employed a methodological approach that was as meticulous as a chemist measuring precise quantities of reagents in a laboratory experiment. Our data gathering process resembled a thorough scavenger hunt, with the treasure being elusive correlations and unexpected statistical surprises. The primary sources of data for Biomass power generation emanated from the Energy Information Administration, while data for Burglaries in North Dakota were sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services – a pairing as unlikely as finding a unicorn in a field of daisies. The use of longitudinal data from 1985 to 2021 ensured a comprehensive exploration of the dynamic interplay between these seemingly incongruous variables, akin to meticulously observing the ebb and flow of tide currents from the safety of a secure harbor.

To address the inherent complexity of this research inquiry, we employed advanced statistical techniques such as multiple regression analysis, time series modeling, and principal component analysis. These methods served as our trusty compass through the labyrinth of data, guiding us in the exploration of potential relationships and patterns. Furthermore, we conducted a detailed examination of various control variables, akin to an archaeologist meticulously sifting through layers of earth to unveil hidden artifacts, ensuring that the observed correlation was not confounded by extraneous factors. The inclusion of such control variables was as crucial to our analysis as calibrating a microscope to achieve optimal resolution in an image, allowing for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between Biomass power generation and Burglaries in North Dakota.

All data were rigorously screened for outliers and missing values, employing a meticulous approach akin to ensuring that every ingredient in a meticulously crafted soufflé was of the highest quality and proportion. The data were then subjected to rigorous econometric tests, akin to stress-testing the hull of a ship to ensure its resilience against turbulent seas. Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations, akin to stress-testing a theoretical model against a myriad of hypothetical scenarios, unveiling the resilience and validity of our statistical results.

It is imperative to acknowledge the inherent limitations of our methodology. While our approach aimed to tease out unexpected correlations with the precision of a magician deftly performing sleight of hand, the complexities of real-world data necessitate a cautious interpretation of the results. Nevertheless, our methodological framework formed a sturdy vessel, navigating the choppy waters of statistical analysis to unveil a surprising connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, much like discovering a hidden treasure trove amidst the convoluted corridors of an antique castle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1985 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6207464, r-squared of 0.3853261, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across diverse fields. While the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota may at first glance appear as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza, our investigation has unearthed a correlation that defies conventional logic. As we delve into the depths of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that statistical surprises can be as delightful as stumbling upon a "Eureka!" moment in the laboratory or finding the solution to a complex equation hidden in a pile of data.
Over the years, the study of correlations has often evoked as much fascination as deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle or unraveling the enigmatic structure of a DNA molecule. The challenges posed by unexpected linkages between seemingly disparate variables can be as intriguing as trying to interpret the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics. Yet, it is through these investigations that we may emerge with new insights and a deeper understanding of the intricate dance of data, akin to piecing together the fragments of a puzzle to reveal a surprising picture.
In this paper, we present the findings of our exploration into the correlation between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, a puzzle that, much like a maze in a perplexing labyrinth, is rife with unexpected twists and turns. Our endeavor has uncovered a statistical link that may leave one as pleasantly surprised as stumbling upon a hidden joke in a serious conversation or discovering a clever play on words in a voluminous tome of scientific literature.
The search for meaningful connections in an ever-expanding sea of data is not unlike embarking on a quest for buried treasure, with each correlation serving as a potential gem waiting to be unearthed. Through our rigorous analysis of the data, we aim to shed light on this unlikely pairing and encourage fellow researchers to approach their own investigations with a sense of curiosity and a readiness to embrace the unexpected, much like venturing into a forest and stumbling upon a seemingly out-of-place yet perfectly delightful patch of wildflowers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. The coefficient of determination, indicated by the r-squared value of 0.3853261, demonstrates that approximately 38.53% of the variation in burglaries in North Dakota can be explained by the variation in biomass power generated in Panama.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further indicates a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, supporting the notion that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. It seems that the connection between Biomass power in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota is more than just a happenstance, much like stumbling upon a treasure chest while beachcombing or finding a hidden stash of snacks in the back of a pantry.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the strong correlation, akin to a captivating piece of abstract art that leaves the observer contemplating the interplay between two seemingly unrelated elements. The scatterplot, much like a well-constructed joke, presents the unexpected connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota with a touch of whimsy and surprise.

The results of this study challenge conventional assumptions and highlight the need for further investigation into the intricate dynamics of seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected correlation serves as a reminder that in the vast landscape of data analysis, remarkable associations may emerge, much like finding a rare four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers or stumbling upon an unexpected pun in a serious academic paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota is a topic that has not received extensive attention in the academic literature. However, a few studies have examined related variables and provided insights into unexpected correlations, much like finding a misplaced sock that turns out to be a perfect match for another lost sock hidden in the depths of a dresser drawer.
Smith et al. (2010) studied the relationship between renewable energy production and crime rates, including property crimes such as burglary. The study found a correlation between increased renewable energy production and a decrease in property crime rates, which beguilingly challenges conventional assumptions about the relationship between energy sources and criminal activity. Jones (2013) explored the impact of environmental factors on criminal behavior, shedding light on the potential influence of renewable energy infrastructure on local crime dynamics. The nuanced investigation unearthed compelling evidence of the complex interplay between environmental variables and criminal activity, much like unraveling a tangled ball of yarn to reveal an unexpected pattern.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Biomass Revolution: Modernize Your Energy" by John Smith (2018) and "The Art of Burglary: A Comprehensive Guide" by Jane Doe (2017) present informative perspectives on the respective topics that may offer unconventional insights into the seemingly disparate link between Biomass power generation and Burglaries in North Dakota. Meanwhile, an exploration of fictional narratives yields intriguing titles such as "The Secret Life of Panama's Power Plants" by A. J. Jones (2015) and "The Burglar's Blueprint: A Tale of Caper and Energy" by R. Smith (2019), which, despite their imaginative nature, may contain nuggets of wisdom relevant to our investigation.
In a departure from conventional scholarly sources, social media posts have also offered intriguing observations on this enigmatic correlation. A user on a popular microblogging platform suggested, "Maybe the burglars in North Dakota are just really eco-friendly and are trying to investigate the sustainability of Biomass power in Panama firsthand!" This thought-provoking conjecture invites a lighthearted yet thoughtful perspective on the unexpected convergence of Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generation in Panama, akin to stumbling upon a whimsical hidden message in a fortune cookie.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. The coefficient of determination, indicated by the r-squared value of 0.3853261, demonstrates that approximately 38.53% of the variation in burglaries in North Dakota can be explained by the variation in biomass power generated in Panama.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further indicates a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, supporting the notion that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. It seems that the connection between Biomass power in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota is more than just a happenstance, much like stumbling upon a treasure chest while beachcombing or finding a hidden stash of snacks in the back of a pantry.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the strong correlation, akin to a captivating piece of abstract art that leaves the observer contemplating the interplay between two seemingly unrelated elements. The scatterplot, much like a well-constructed joke, presents the unexpected connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota with a touch of whimsy and surprise.
The results of this study challenge conventional assumptions and highlight the need for further investigation into the intricate dynamics of seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected correlation serves as a reminder that in the vast landscape of data analysis, remarkable associations may emerge, much like finding a rare four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers or stumbling upon an unexpected pun in a serious academic paper.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota aligns with and extends prior research findings, shedding light on a surprising relationship that may leave one feeling like they've stumbled upon a hidden treasure in a forgotten attic. Smith et al. (2010) hinted at the potential influence of renewable energy production on property crime rates, a notion that has been accentuated by our study's results much like a misplaced sock finding its perfect match.

While the findings appear to contradict conventional assumptions, they underscore the intricate interplay between environmental factors and criminal activity, much like the unraveling of a complex mystery novel. The statistically significant p-value adds weight to the notion that this correlation is no fluke, reinforcing the idea that remarkable associations may emerge from data analysis, not unlike finding an unexpected pun in a serious academic paper.

The visualization of the strong correlation through the scatterplot (Fig. 1) invites contemplation on the interplay between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, much like a well-constructed joke that leaves the audience both amused and pensive. These surprising findings emphasize the need for further investigation into the unexpected connections that emerge from the intricate landscape of statistical analysis, akin to stumbling upon a thought-provoking riddle in the midst of a mundane moment.

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a correlation that challenges established assumptions and prompts a reevaluation of the complex relationship between seemingly unrelated variables. This unexpected connection serves as a reminder that in the vast field of data analysis, there may be hidden gems waiting to be discovered, much like finding a clever pun in the midst of a dry academic paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in North Dakota and Biomass power generated in Panama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded

[[ABSTRACT]]
The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of seemingly unrelated variables has long intrigued researchers across diverse fields. While the connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota may at first glance appear as incongruous as a pineapple on a pizza, our investigation has unearthed a correlation that defies conventional logic. As we delve into the depths of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that statistical surprises can be as delightful as stumbling upon a "Eureka!" moment in the laboratory or finding the solution to a complex equation hidden in a pile of data.
Over the years, the study of correlations has often evoked as much fascination as deciphering a cryptic crossword puzzle or unraveling the enigmatic structure of a DNA molecule. The challenges posed by unexpected linkages between seemingly disparate variables can be as intriguing as trying to interpret the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics. Yet, it is through these investigations that we may emerge with new insights and a deeper understanding of the intricate dance of data, akin to piecing together the fragments of a puzzle to reveal a surprising picture.
In this paper, we present the findings of our exploration into the correlation between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, a puzzle that, much like a maze in a perplexing labyrinth, is rife with unexpected twists and turns. Our endeavor has uncovered a statistical link that may leave one as pleasantly surprised as stumbling upon a hidden joke in a serious conversation or discovering a clever play on words in a voluminous tome of scientific literature.
The search for meaningful connections in an ever-expanding sea of data is not unlike embarking on a quest for buried treasure, with each correlation serving as a potential gem waiting to be unearthed. Through our rigorous analysis of the data, we aim to shed light on this unlikely pairing and encourage fellow researchers to approach their own investigations with a sense of curiosity and a readiness to embrace the unexpected, much like venturing into a forest and stumbling upon a seemingly out-of-place yet perfectly delightful patch of wildflowers.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. The coefficient of determination, indicated by the r-squared value of 0.3853261, demonstrates that approximately 38.53% of the variation in burglaries in North Dakota can be explained by the variation in biomass power generated in Panama.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further indicates a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, supporting the notion that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. It seems that the connection between Biomass power in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota is more than just a happenstance, much like stumbling upon a treasure chest while beachcombing or finding a hidden stash of snacks in the back of a pantry.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of the strong correlation, akin to a captivating piece of abstract art that leaves the observer contemplating the interplay between two seemingly unrelated elements. The scatterplot, much like a well-constructed joke, presents the unexpected connection between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota with a touch of whimsy and surprise.
The results of this study challenge conventional assumptions and highlight the need for further investigation into the intricate dynamics of seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected correlation serves as a reminder that in the vast landscape of data analysis, remarkable associations may emerge, much like finding a rare four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers or stumbling upon an unexpected pun in a serious academic paper.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a statistically significant correlation between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota, leaving one as pleasantly surprised as discovering that the square root of a negative number is an imaginary number or stumbling upon a well-camouflaged chameleon in a lush rainforest. Like a magician revealing a clever trick, the strength of this correlation, as indicated by the correlation coefficient and r-squared value, suggests that there may be more to this unexpected relationship than meets the eye, much like finding a hidden compartment in an old piece of furniture.

The visual representation of the correlation in the scatterplot adds an element of artistry to our findings, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected doodle in the margins of a research notebook. However, despite the seeming delight of this discovery, caution must be exercised in ascribing causality to this correlation. While our study has shed light on this captivating connection, it is important to approach the interpretation of the results with the same level of scrutiny as one would apply to dissecting a cryptic riddle or deciphering an enigmatic code.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this peculiar area of investigation, given the seemingly whimsical and unexpected nature of the correlation. It stands as a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis, much like chancing upon a harmonious melody while shuffling through a deck of cards or uncovering an unexpected punchline in a rather serious discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Enigmas


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ecological Criminology and Unlikely Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled When Biomass in Panama Meets Burglaries in North Dakota: a Surprising Connection Decoded with an abstract of The vexing conundrum of seemingly unrelated phenomena may lead to unexpected correlations, as demonstrated by our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Biomass power generation in Panama and Burglaries in North Dakota. Leveraging data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, we have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6207464 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1985 to 2021. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite a closer examination of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. This study elucidates a fascinating statistical link that may leave one pleasantly surprised, akin to finding a pearl in an oyster or a clever pun in a dry academic paper.

ChatGPT:

Biomass power generation, Panama, Burglaries, North Dakota, correlation, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, statistical link, unexpected correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Burglaries in North Dakota
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in North Dakota
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in North Dakota

Biomass power generated in Panama
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Panama in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Panama

Correlation r = 0.6207464 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3853261 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 38.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Panama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Burglaries in North Dakota) over the 37 years from 1985 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-5. 0.0000415007868038996270000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.62 in 0.0042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 24,096 random variables You don't actually need 24 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 36 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 36 because we have two variables measured over a period of 37 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.37, 0.79 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Burglaries in North Dakota (Burglary rate)427385.1455.4437.7358.9426.6372.8391373.2324.5350.7309.2358.8356.4368.8325.9340.1353.8309.3320.6321.9409361.7364.2375.1296.5359346.3411.5371.7435.5429.9390.2361.7346.5417.6399
Biomass power generated in Panama (Billion kWh)0.0970.1050.0960.1280.0680.0560.040.0460.0420.0280.0150.0180.0210.0230.0290.0240.0230.0180.0210.0240.0230.0720.0760.0160.0230.0220.0230.0240.0320.0290.0310.0310.040.050.0520.0620.0624941




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([427,385.1,455.4,437.7,358.9,426.6,372.8,391,373.2,324.5,350.7,309.2,358.8,356.4,368.8,325.9,340.1,353.8,309.3,320.6,321.9,409,361.7,364.2,375.1,296.5,359,346.3,411.5,371.7,435.5,429.9,390.2,361.7,346.5,417.6,399,])
array_2 = np.array([0.097,0.105,0.096,0.128,0.068,0.056,0.04,0.046,0.042,0.028,0.015,0.018,0.021,0.023,0.029,0.024,0.023,0.018,0.021,0.024,0.023,0.072,0.076,0.016,0.023,0.022,0.023,0.024,0.032,0.029,0.031,0.031,0.04,0.05,0.052,0.062,0.0624941,])
array_1_name = "Burglaries in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Panama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4069 · Black Variable ID: 20112 · Red Variable ID: 23889
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0