about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,073 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the second variable is The number of receptionists in New Hampshire.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Perhaps as the Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set increased, more and more fans were losing their voices from all the cheering. This led to a spike in demand for receptionists in New Hampshire, as the raspy-voiced fans needed someone to field their calls while they recuperated with honey and lemon.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a minimalist stadium filled with fans, cheering and celebrating as the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set increases. Outside the stadium, in New Hampshire, depict a simple scene of receptionists handling a surge in demand, with raspy-voiced fans calling in for assistance, and the receptionists offering honey and lemon to help them recuperate. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Woodblock painting inspired by bauhaus Minimalism
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire, in the following situation: Perhaps as the Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set increased, more and more fans were losing their voices from all the cheering. This led to a spike in demand for receptionists in New Hampshire, as the raspy-voiced fans needed someone to field their calls while they recuperated with honey and lemon.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set increased, the stadium erupted with cheers and excitement. Fans were losing their voices from all the cheering. Meanwhile, in New Hampshire, the demand for receptionists spiked as raspy-voiced fans called in for assistance while they recuperated with honey and lemon.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: As the Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set increased, the stadium erupted with cheers and excitement. Fans were losing their voices from all the cheering. Meanwhile, in New Hampshire, the demand for receptionists spiked as raspy-voiced fans called in for assistance while they recuperated with honey and lemon. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a minimalist stadium filled with fans, cheering and celebrating as the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set increases. Outside the stadium, in New Hampshire, depict a simple scene of receptionists handling a surge in demand, with raspy-voiced fans calling in for assistance, and the receptionists offering honey and lemon to help them recuperate.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set positively influenced The number of receptionists in New Hampshire.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

The Journal of Quirky Connections in Sports Research

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon surprising and perplexing correlations that leave even the most astute scholars scratching their heads. Our current study is no exception, as it unearths an eccentric and enigmatic relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the picturesque state of New Hampshire. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss this unexpected link as a mere statistical fluke, an anomaly that defies logic and reason. However, our rigorous analysis of the data for the years 2003 to 2012 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 that simply cannot be ignored, along with a p-value so low, it practically begs for attention.

Now, the connection between sports and employment in a specific state may seem like an odd pairing – a bit like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps in this case, tennis and telephones. One might even go so far as to call it a "match" made in unconventional statistical heaven. Nonetheless, it is precisely this unexpectedness that makes the findings of this study all the more tantalizing – akin to stumbling upon a mysterious yet captivating puzzle, waiting to be deciphered. The study ventures into uncharted territory, where the subtle nuances of tennis and the daily operations of receptionists intertwine in an unsuspecting dance of numbers and trends.

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we look beyond the conventional wisdom of statistical analysis and delve into the realm of quirky correlations, defying the expectations of traditional research. Our study strives to unpack the implications of this bizarre association, shedding light on what could only be described as a statistical oddity of unparalleled proportions. Join us as we unravel the curious bond between a high-stakes tennis tournament and the occupation of receptionists, and explore the uncharted territory of unlikely correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon surprising and perplexing correlations that leave even the most astute scholars scratching their heads. Our current study is no exception, as it unearths an eccentric and enigmatic relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the picturesque state of New Hampshire. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss this unexpected link as a mere statistical fluke, an anomaly that defies logic and reason. However, our rigorous analysis of the data for the years 2003 to 2012 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 that simply cannot be ignored, along with a p-value so low, it practically begs for attention.
Now, the connection between sports and employment in a specific state may seem like an odd pairing – a bit like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps in this case, tennis and telephones. One might even go so far as to call it a "match" made in unconventional statistical heaven. Nonetheless, it is precisely this unexpectedness that makes the findings of this study all the more tantalizing – akin to stumbling upon a mysterious yet captivating puzzle, waiting to be deciphered. The study ventures into uncharted territory, where the subtle nuances of tennis and the daily operations of receptionists intertwine in an unsuspecting dance of numbers and trends.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we look beyond the conventional wisdom of statistical analysis and delve into the realm of quirky correlations, defying the expectations of traditional research. Our study strives to unpack the implications of this bizarre association, shedding light on what could only be described as a statistical oddity of unparalleled proportions. Join us as we unravel the curious bond between a high-stakes tennis tournament and the occupation of receptionists, and explore the uncharted territory of unlikely correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Statistical Chronicles of Unlikely Correlations," Smith et al. explore the peculiar and often confounding relationships that emerge from statistical analyses, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation in the face of unexpected findings. Similarly, Doe et al. discuss the intricate dance of variables in "Quantitative Quirks: Unraveling the Unusual Connections in Data," shedding light on the perplexing nature of statistical anomalies and the inherent challenges they pose to researchers. Furthermore, Jones et al. delve into the complexities of unanticipated correlations in "Beyond the Expected: Navigating Surprising Statistical Relationships," highlighting the importance of critically examining unusual connections with a blend of skepticism and curiosity.

As we plunge into the world of unexpected associations, we cannot overlook the potential influence of non-fiction works that may inform our understanding of this ostensibly unfathomable correlation. Books such as "Numbers at Play: The Curious Case of Unlikely Unions" by Data D. MacGuffin and "From Courts to Calls: The Intriguing Interplay of Sports and Services" by Facta N. Fition provide theoretical frameworks for exploring the intersection of statistical oddities and seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, "Econometrics and Enigmas: Unraveling Unconventional Connections" by Stat T. Stician offers valuable insights into the intricate interplay of statistical variables and the enigmatic patterns that may arise.

Turning our attention to fictional literature, where imagination knows no bounds, we find narratives that, although not directly linked to our research, bear peculiar titles that could easily be mistaken for hypothetical works on our current subject. Works such as "The Receptionist's Racket" by Ace Set and "Match Point Mysteries: The Curious Case of Tennis Telepathy" by Serve A. Volley capture the whimsical essence of our unexpected statistical discovery, albeit in a purely fictional context.

Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, where strategy and chance intertwine, one cannot help but ponder the intriguing parallels between our research and the game of Clue. Just as players must discern unexpected connections and solve perplexing mysteries in the whimsical confines of the game, so too do we seek to unravel the enigma of the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire.

These diverse sources, spanning non-fiction, fiction, and even recreational activities, underscore the unexpected and borderline comical nature of our research endeavor. Through this unconventional literary lens, we further illuminate the unconventional and peculiar fabric of our scholarly pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon surprising and perplexing correlations that leave even the most astute scholars scratching their heads. Our current study is no exception, as it unearths an eccentric and enigmatic relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the picturesque state of New Hampshire. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss this unexpected link as a mere statistical fluke, an anomaly that defies logic and reason. However, our rigorous analysis of the data for the years 2003 to 2012 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 that simply cannot be ignored, along with a p-value so low, it practically begs for attention.
Now, the connection between sports and employment in a specific state may seem like an odd pairing – a bit like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps in this case, tennis and telephones. One might even go so far as to call it a "match" made in unconventional statistical heaven. Nonetheless, it is precisely this unexpectedness that makes the findings of this study all the more tantalizing – akin to stumbling upon a mysterious yet captivating puzzle, waiting to be deciphered. The study ventures into uncharted territory, where the subtle nuances of tennis and the daily operations of receptionists intertwine in an unsuspecting dance of numbers and trends.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we look beyond the conventional wisdom of statistical analysis and delve into the realm of quirky correlations, defying the expectations of traditional research. Our study strives to unpack the implications of this bizarre association, shedding light on what could only be described as a statistical oddity of unparalleled proportions. Join us as we unravel the curious bond between a high-stakes tennis tournament and the occupation of receptionists, and explore the uncharted territory of unlikely correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To reveal the peculiar entanglement between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire, our research embarked on a journey as intriguing and labyrinthine as solving a Rubik's Cube blindfolded. Our data collection process involved skillful navigation through the digital corridors of the internet, where we scoured virtual libraries, roamed the halls of Wikipedia, and braved the eclectic shores of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The years 2003 to 2012 served as the canvases upon which our data were painted, capturing the nuances of time as it waltzed through the realms of tennis and employment.

This whimsical quest began with the assembly of a team of intrepid data sleuths, armed with both expertise in statistical analysis and a burning passion for unraveling the mysterious tapestry of interwoven variables. Armed with pen, paper, and an abundance of coffee, our intrepid researchers ventured forth to collect and collate mountains of numerical data, transforming raw information into the currency of our scholarly pursuit.

The primary protagonist of our investigation was the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set, a figure steeped in the suspense and exhilaration of tennis, embodying the exquisite ballet of volleys, aces, backhands, and the occasional tantrum. To capture this essence, our team extracted the pertinent match score differences from the hallowed archives of tennis lore, meticulous in our mining of data to ensure the accuracy and integrity of each scored triumph and defeat.

Meanwhile, in the sunlit meadows of New Hampshire, a cadre of receptionists stood at the ready, deftly navigating phone lines and welcoming visitors with a grace that mirrored the finesse of a well-placed drop shot. To quantify this industrious cohort, we wrangled the number of receptionists from the statistical annals, where they awaited their moment in the scholarly spotlight. The year-by-year fluctuations in their ranks painted a vivid tableau of the ebb and flow of this enigmatic workforce, inviting us to ponder the curious interplay between their domain and the courts of tennis.

The orchestration of this duet of data involved a harmonious synergy of statistical maneuvers, conjuring correlation coefficients, p-values, and the like from the very fabric of our numerical tapestry. This ballet of numbers, akin to a grand performance at the theater of statistical significance, ultimately unveiled the resounding correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a p-value shrouded in the mystique of extremity – a value less than 0.01, daring us to dismiss it as sheer happenstance.

In conjunction with these dramatic revelations, our analysis embraced the ancestral wisdom of regression models, deftly weaving the threads of match score differences and receptionist counts to unearth the subtle interplay between these seemingly disparate facets of society. The entwined alchemy of data manipulation, statistical rigor, and the occasional nod to serendipity propelled our research towards the triumph of uncovering a bond as unlikely as a teapot orbiting Jupiter.

As the mist of scholarly inquiry clears, the unexpected marriage of tennis triumphs and phone-line trysts emerges as a testament to the unexpectedness of statistical serendipity, where the hallowed traditions of research and the whimsy of unpredictability intertwine in a dance as lively as a mad scientist's cha-cha.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.9829995, r-squared of 0.9662879, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon surprising and perplexing correlations that leave even the most astute scholars scratching their heads. Our current study is no exception, as it unearths an eccentric and enigmatic relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the picturesque state of New Hampshire. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss this unexpected link as a mere statistical fluke, an anomaly that defies logic and reason. However, our rigorous analysis of the data for the years 2003 to 2012 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 that simply cannot be ignored, along with a p-value so low, it practically begs for attention.
Now, the connection between sports and employment in a specific state may seem like an odd pairing – a bit like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps in this case, tennis and telephones. One might even go so far as to call it a "match" made in unconventional statistical heaven. Nonetheless, it is precisely this unexpectedness that makes the findings of this study all the more tantalizing – akin to stumbling upon a mysterious yet captivating puzzle, waiting to be deciphered. The study ventures into uncharted territory, where the subtle nuances of tennis and the daily operations of receptionists intertwine in an unsuspecting dance of numbers and trends.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we look beyond the conventional wisdom of statistical analysis and delve into the realm of quirky correlations, defying the expectations of traditional research. Our study strives to unpack the implications of this bizarre association, shedding light on what could only be described as a statistical oddity of unparalleled proportions. Join us as we unravel the curious bond between a high-stakes tennis tournament and the occupation of receptionists, and explore the uncharted territory of unlikely correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed an astonishing correlation between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire, for the period spanning from 2003 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 left our research team simultaneously flabbergasted and tickled pink, as it exceeded even our wildest expectations for an unusual and seemingly unrelated convergence of variables. The strong correlation was mirrored by an r-squared value of 0.9662879, underscoring the robustness and reliability of the relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this association occurring by chance is statistically remote, adding an element of piquancy to the mix.

Notably, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a visual testament to the striking correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The data points coalesce into a tight cluster, further affirming the robustness and consistency of the relationship under scrutiny. It's as if the tennis court and the reception desk engaged in an unexpected dance, mirroring each other's moves with surprising precision.

These findings challenge the traditional boundaries of statistical relationships and beckon us to contemplate the peculiar and whimsical nature of the data. To put it simply, the convergence of the Volkswagen Challenger Set final match score difference and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire defies traditional logic, rendering this statistical anomaly a delightful conundrum for the research community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Statistical Chronicles of Unlikely Correlations," Smith et al. explore the peculiar and often confounding relationships that emerge from statistical analyses, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation in the face of unexpected findings. Similarly, Doe et al. discuss the intricate dance of variables in "Quantitative Quirks: Unraveling the Unusual Connections in Data," shedding light on the perplexing nature of statistical anomalies and the inherent challenges they pose to researchers. Furthermore, Jones et al. delve into the complexities of unanticipated correlations in "Beyond the Expected: Navigating Surprising Statistical Relationships," highlighting the importance of critically examining unusual connections with a blend of skepticism and curiosity.
As we plunge into the world of unexpected associations, we cannot overlook the potential influence of non-fiction works that may inform our understanding of this ostensibly unfathomable correlation. Books such as "Numbers at Play: The Curious Case of Unlikely Unions" by Data D. MacGuffin and "From Courts to Calls: The Intriguing Interplay of Sports and Services" by Facta N. Fition provide theoretical frameworks for exploring the intersection of statistical oddities and seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, "Econometrics and Enigmas: Unraveling Unconventional Connections" by Stat T. Stician offers valuable insights into the intricate interplay of statistical variables and the enigmatic patterns that may arise.
Turning our attention to fictional literature, where imagination knows no bounds, we find narratives that, although not directly linked to our research, bear peculiar titles that could easily be mistaken for hypothetical works on our current subject. Works such as "The Receptionist's Racket" by Ace Set and "Match Point Mysteries: The Curious Case of Tennis Telepathy" by Serve A. Volley capture the whimsical essence of our unexpected statistical discovery, albeit in a purely fictional context.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, where strategy and chance intertwine, one cannot help but ponder the intriguing parallels between our research and the game of Clue. Just as players must discern unexpected connections and solve perplexing mysteries in the whimsical confines of the game, so too do we seek to unravel the enigma of the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire.
These diverse sources, spanning non-fiction, fiction, and even recreational activities, underscore the unexpected and borderline comical nature of our research endeavor. Through this unconventional literary lens, we further illuminate the unconventional and peculiar fabric of our scholarly pursuit.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed an astonishing correlation between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire, for the period spanning from 2003 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 left our research team simultaneously flabbergasted and tickled pink, as it exceeded even our wildest expectations for an unusual and seemingly unrelated convergence of variables. The strong correlation was mirrored by an r-squared value of 0.9662879, underscoring the robustness and reliability of the relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this association occurring by chance is statistically remote, adding an element of piquancy to the mix.
Notably, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a visual testament to the striking correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The data points coalesce into a tight cluster, further affirming the robustness and consistency of the relationship under scrutiny. It's as if the tennis court and the reception desk engaged in an unexpected dance, mirroring each other's moves with surprising precision.
These findings challenge the traditional boundaries of statistical relationships and beckon us to contemplate the peculiar and whimsical nature of the data. To put it simply, the convergence of the Volkswagen Challenger Set final match score difference and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire defies traditional logic, rendering this statistical anomaly a delightful conundrum for the research community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected correlation uncovered in this research marks a notable departure from the anticipated norms of statistical relationships. As echoed by Smith et al. and Doe et al., the findings of this study exemplify the quirky and confounding nature of statistical anomalies, captivating our imagination and challenging our conventional expectations. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 fortifies the findings, aligning with the cautionary yet humorous insights presented by Jones et al. The relationship between final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire harmonizes with the intellectual jest fostered by unconventional literature, where fictional titles such as "The Receptionist's Racket" and "Match Point Mysteries: The Curious Case of Tennis Telepathy" playfully converge with our empirical findings.
Recognizing the inordinate strength of the correlation, one cannot help but invoke the imagery of the game of Clue, where unraveling unexpected connections and solving seemingly improbable mysteries resonate with the improbable coherence we have observed. The substantial r-squared value further accentuates the robustness of the association, akin to the meticulous precision with which a tennis player executes a backhand volley. Moreover, the visually compelling scatterplot encapsulates the unexpected dance between the tennis court and the reception desk, akin to an intricate play of strategy and chance in a board game.
In essence, the enigma of this statistical oddity transcends traditional conventions and invites researchers and scholars to humorously reflect upon the whimsical fabric of our scholarly pursuit. The curious convergence of the Volkswagen Challenger Set final match score difference and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire amplifies the delight in unraveling unconventional connections in the realm of quantitative inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and The number of receptionists in New Hampshire. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of research, it is not uncommon to stumble upon surprising and perplexing correlations that leave even the most astute scholars scratching their heads. Our current study is no exception, as it unearths an eccentric and enigmatic relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the picturesque state of New Hampshire. At first glance, one might be tempted to dismiss this unexpected link as a mere statistical fluke, an anomaly that defies logic and reason. However, our rigorous analysis of the data for the years 2003 to 2012 has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 that simply cannot be ignored, along with a p-value so low, it practically begs for attention.
Now, the connection between sports and employment in a specific state may seem like an odd pairing – a bit like trying to mix oil and water, or perhaps in this case, tennis and telephones. One might even go so far as to call it a "match" made in unconventional statistical heaven. Nonetheless, it is precisely this unexpectedness that makes the findings of this study all the more tantalizing – akin to stumbling upon a mysterious yet captivating puzzle, waiting to be deciphered. The study ventures into uncharted territory, where the subtle nuances of tennis and the daily operations of receptionists intertwine in an unsuspecting dance of numbers and trends.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we look beyond the conventional wisdom of statistical analysis and delve into the realm of quirky correlations, defying the expectations of traditional research. Our study strives to unpack the implications of this bizarre association, shedding light on what could only be described as a statistical oddity of unparalleled proportions. Join us as we unravel the curious bond between a high-stakes tennis tournament and the occupation of receptionists, and explore the uncharted territory of unlikely correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed an astonishing correlation between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire, for the period spanning from 2003 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 left our research team simultaneously flabbergasted and tickled pink, as it exceeded even our wildest expectations for an unusual and seemingly unrelated convergence of variables. The strong correlation was mirrored by an r-squared value of 0.9662879, underscoring the robustness and reliability of the relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this association occurring by chance is statistically remote, adding an element of piquancy to the mix.
Notably, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a visual testament to the striking correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The data points coalesce into a tight cluster, further affirming the robustness and consistency of the relationship under scrutiny. It's as if the tennis court and the reception desk engaged in an unexpected dance, mirroring each other's moves with surprising precision.
These findings challenge the traditional boundaries of statistical relationships and beckon us to contemplate the peculiar and whimsical nature of the data. To put it simply, the convergence of the Volkswagen Challenger Set final match score difference and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire defies traditional logic, rendering this statistical anomaly a delightful conundrum for the research community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the unexpected and uncanny correspondence between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in New Hampshire, for the years 2003 to 2012, has left us with more questions than answers. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 has not only defied conventional statistical wisdom but has also added a touch of whimsy to the usually stoic world of research. It's as if the tennis court and the reception desk conspired to create a statistical ballet of sorts, much to the bemusement of our research team.

This odd correlation, akin to a surprising twist in a mystery novel, challenges our preconceptions and underscores the need for continuous vigilance in the pursuit of knowledge. The unanticipated parallels between these disparate variables hint at an underlying connection that eludes clear explanation, much like a mischievous puzzle begging to be solved. Perhaps there is a latent significance to this statistical anomaly that remains tantalizingly out of reach, akin to a punchline lingering just beyond our grasp.

In light of these perplexing findings, it seems that no stone should be left unturned in the quest for understanding unconventional correlations. However, it is our contention that further investigation into this curious phenomenon may only serve to unravel more enigmas and perplexities, akin to poking a mischievous statistical hornet's nest. Therefore, we cautiously propose that no additional research in this field may be necessary. After all, some statistical revelations are best left to tickle the imagination, much like a well-crafted pun that lingers in the mind long after it is spoken.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Connections in Sports Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Zany Research Endeavors


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Match Made in Reception: The Quirky Connection Between Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the Number of Receptionists in New Hampshire with an abstract of This paper explores the surprising and seemingly unrelated relationship between the final match score difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set and the number of receptionists in the state of New Hampshire. Using data sourced from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2003 to 2012, our research team identified a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9829995 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the initial skepticism about the feasibility of such a correlation, our findings suggest a bizarre and inexplicable link between these two variables. We delve into potential interpretations and implications of this unexpected connection and attempt to shed light on this unanticipated statistical oddity.

ChatGPT:

Volkswagen Challenger Set, final match score difference, receptionists, New Hampshire, correlation coefficient, p-value, statistical oddity, data analysis, unexpected connection, bizarre relationship, interpretation, implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set

The number of receptionists in New Hampshire
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of receptionists and information clerks in New Hampshire
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of receptionists in New Hampshire

Correlation r = 0.9829995 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9662879 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of receptionists in New Hampshire) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set) over the 10 years from 2003 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-7. 0.0000003580485406848091500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 3.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,792,917 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012
Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set (Score difference)2556611032
The number of receptionists in New Hampshire (Laborers)4920530054105520539048704750462051304940




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,5,5,6,6,1,1,0,3,2,])
array_2 = np.array([4920,5300,5410,5520,5390,4870,4750,4620,5130,4940,])
array_1_name = "Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set"
array_2_name = "The number of receptionists in New Hampshire"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4073 · Black Variable ID: 108 · Red Variable ID: 11427
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0