about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,301 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Pearl and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Pearl gained popularity, more and more people were subconsciously drawn to the idea of individualism and personal freedom. This led them to support the Libertarian candidate in New Mexico, as they saw a reflection of their independent spirit in the political platform. It's as if the name itself was casting a lustrous vote for liberty, causing a political ripple that even the shiniest oyster would find hard to resist!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a magical realism scene in a busy New Mexico town where a voting booth adorned with a bright and vibrant banner for the Libertarian Party stands out among the crowd. People wearing "Pearl" name tags lend an air of significance to the name, while casting their votes emanating a quiet ripple of liberty and independent spirit throughout the scene. The growing support for the Libertarian candidate becomes evident as the scene unfolds, capturing the essence of magic and tangible freedom. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Macabre Low poly Hyper-realistic Magic realism
ChatGPT: Magic realism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico, in the following situation: As the name Pearl gained popularity, more and more people were subconsciously drawn to the idea of individualism and personal freedom. This led them to support the Libertarian candidate in New Mexico, as they saw a reflection of their independent spirit in the political platform. It's as if the name itself was casting a lustrous vote for liberty, causing a political ripple that even the shiniest oyster would find hard to resist!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling New Mexico town, a crowd gathers around a voting booth adorned with a banner for the Libertarian Party. The name "Pearl" shines brightly on a nearby billboard, indicating its popularity. People in the crowd wear "Pearl" name tags, and as they cast their votes, a ripple of liberty and independent spirit spreads through the air, linking the rising popularity of the name to the growing support for the Libertarian candidate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling New Mexico town, a crowd gathers around a voting booth adorned with a banner for the Libertarian Party. The name "Pearl" shines brightly on a nearby billboard, indicating its popularity. People in the crowd wear "Pearl" name tags, and as they cast their votes, a ripple of liberty and independent spirit spreads through the air, linking the rising popularity of the name to the growing support for the Libertarian candidate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a magical realism scene in a busy New Mexico town where a voting booth adorned with a bright and vibrant banner for the Libertarian Party stands out among the crowd. People wearing "Pearl" name tags lend an air of significance to the name, while casting their votes emanating a quiet ripple of liberty and independent spirit throughout the scene. The growing support for the Libertarian candidate becomes evident as the scene unfolds, capturing the essence of magic and tangible freedom.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Pearl caused Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

The Journal of Electrifying Socio-Political Associations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been an area of fascination for both researchers and laypeople alike. From the catchy cadence of certain names to the stately gravitas of others, the potential influence of a moniker on one's political preference has been a subject of both amusement and serious inquiry. In this vein, our study delves into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the captivating state of New Mexico.

New Mexico, often referred to as the "Land of Enchantment," provides an ideal backdrop for this inquiry, as it brings to mind images of glittering pearls adorning the desert landscape, juxtaposed with the rugged individualism and love of liberty often associated with the Libertarian party. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the curious relationship between a luminous name and a political preference characterized by a desire for personal freedom and limited government intervention.

The allure of investigating such an unexpected connection lies in the potential to uncover the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the mere mention of the name "Pearl" sparks a subconscious affinity for liberty and self-governance in the minds of New Mexicans? Or perhaps there are broader cultural and historical nuances at work that intertwine the popularity of this name with a unique political leaning in the state.

Our study harnesses a rigorous quantitative approach, drawing on data meticulously compiled by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. This allows us to shed light on the statistical significance behind the correlation, uncovering intriguing patterns that may have otherwise remained hidden beneath the surface of electoral data.

As we unmask the unexpected relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting patterns, we invite the reader to share in the sense of astonishment and amusement that accompanied our own journey of discovery. While the gravity of statistical analysis prevails, the whimsical nature of our findings lends a playful charm to the otherwise solemn landscape of political research. In doing so, we aim to demonstrate that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there is still room for delight and surprise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been an area of fascination for both researchers and laypeople alike. From the catchy cadence of certain names to the stately gravitas of others, the potential influence of a moniker on one's political preference has been a subject of both amusement and serious inquiry. In this vein, our study delves into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the captivating state of New Mexico.
New Mexico, often referred to as the "Land of Enchantment," provides an ideal backdrop for this inquiry, as it brings to mind images of glittering pearls adorning the desert landscape, juxtaposed with the rugged individualism and love of liberty often associated with the Libertarian party. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the curious relationship between a luminous name and a political preference characterized by a desire for personal freedom and limited government intervention.
The allure of investigating such an unexpected connection lies in the potential to uncover the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the mere mention of the name "Pearl" sparks a subconscious affinity for liberty and self-governance in the minds of New Mexicans? Or perhaps there are broader cultural and historical nuances at work that intertwine the popularity of this name with a unique political leaning in the state.
Our study harnesses a rigorous quantitative approach, drawing on data meticulously compiled by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. This allows us to shed light on the statistical significance behind the correlation, uncovering intriguing patterns that may have otherwise remained hidden beneath the surface of electoral data.
As we unmask the unexpected relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting patterns, we invite the reader to share in the sense of astonishment and amusement that accompanied our own journey of discovery. While the gravity of statistical analysis prevails, the whimsical nature of our findings lends a playful charm to the otherwise solemn landscape of political research. In doing so, we aim to demonstrate that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there is still room for delight and surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have laid the foundation for understanding the intersection of nomenclature and political preference, setting the stage for our investigation into the mesmerizing connection between the name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. In "Smith and Doe," the authors navigate the intriguing realm of name popularity and its potential impact on individual choices, laying the groundwork for our own exploration. Additionally, "Jones et al." provide an in-depth analysis of political voting patterns in New Mexico, offering valuable insights into the unique dynamics of this captivating state.

Moving beyond the traditional academic literature, non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner and "Nudge" by Thaler and Sunstein offer compelling discussions on the subtle influences shaping human behavior. These sources prompt contemplation of the broader societal forces that could contribute to the unexpected correlation between the name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting tendencies. Furthermore, fictional narratives like "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley and "1984" by George Orwell provide an imaginative backdrop for pondering the complexities of political ideology and individual identity. While diverging from the realm of empirical research, these literary works add a whimsical layer to our scholarly inquiry, inviting us to explore the enigmatic relationship between name popularity and electoral choices from a more abstract perspective.

Extending our review beyond the realms of traditional academia and literature, our research team has undertaken an unconventional approach to gather insights into the captivating correlation at hand. By perusing a diverse array of sources, including vintage cookbooks, retrograde astrology manuals, and even reading CVS receipts, we have humorously transcended the standard boundaries of scholarly investigation. These foundational texts have provided us with a comical backdrop to our serious exploration, reminding us that even in the rigorous pursuit of knowledge, there is ample room for levity and unexpected amusement.

Our literature review thus showcases the range of sources that have informed our study, from established academic research to eclectic and humorous inspirations. By incorporating this diverse array of perspectives, we aim to infuse our empirical analysis with a delightful touch of whimsy, acknowledging that even the most serious endeavors can be enlivened by the unexpected and the absurd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been an area of fascination for both researchers and laypeople alike. From the catchy cadence of certain names to the stately gravitas of others, the potential influence of a moniker on one's political preference has been a subject of both amusement and serious inquiry. In this vein, our study delves into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the captivating state of New Mexico.
New Mexico, often referred to as the "Land of Enchantment," provides an ideal backdrop for this inquiry, as it brings to mind images of glittering pearls adorning the desert landscape, juxtaposed with the rugged individualism and love of liberty often associated with the Libertarian party. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the curious relationship between a luminous name and a political preference characterized by a desire for personal freedom and limited government intervention.
The allure of investigating such an unexpected connection lies in the potential to uncover the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the mere mention of the name "Pearl" sparks a subconscious affinity for liberty and self-governance in the minds of New Mexicans? Or perhaps there are broader cultural and historical nuances at work that intertwine the popularity of this name with a unique political leaning in the state.
Our study harnesses a rigorous quantitative approach, drawing on data meticulously compiled by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. This allows us to shed light on the statistical significance behind the correlation, uncovering intriguing patterns that may have otherwise remained hidden beneath the surface of electoral data.
As we unmask the unexpected relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting patterns, we invite the reader to share in the sense of astonishment and amusement that accompanied our own journey of discovery. While the gravity of statistical analysis prevails, the whimsical nature of our findings lends a playful charm to the otherwise solemn landscape of political research. In doing so, we aim to demonstrate that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there is still room for delight and surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to tackle the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico, our research team embarked on a meticulous journey through a realm as vast and uncharted as the New Mexican desert itself - the world of data collection and statistical analysis.

Beginning with the vast treasure trove of moniker-related information housed by the US Social Security Administration, we scoured the databases like intrepid explorers in search of the sparkling gem of data regarding the popularity of the name "Pearl." Panning through birth records from 1976 to 2020, we carefully sifted through the sands of time to discern the temporal ebbs and flows of this luminous name's favor.

Meanwhile, our intrepid data wranglers ventured into the political arena, descending into the depths of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, to unearth the electoral outcomes for New Mexico over the same period. Like determined geologists, we extracted the electoral data with the utmost care, ensuring that our findings would be as sturdy and durable as a well-cut gemstone.

With our trusty statistical tools in hand, we then set about the process of correlation analysis, employing the rigorous methodologies of Pearson's correlation coefficient and hypothesis testing to examine the relationship between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Like alchemists seeking the elusive philosopher's stone, we sought to transmute raw data into the golden elixir of insight and understanding.

With our findings in hand, we then subjected our results to peer review, ensuring that our conclusions were as polished and gleaming as a pristine pearl.

In drawing together these disparate strands of data and analysis, our study stands as a testament to the power of rigorous research in uncovering the unexpected connections that lie just beneath the surface of the everyday. While our methods may have been unconventional, our commitment to uncovering the truth never wavered, much like the steadfast glow of a lustrous pearl amidst the shifting sands of political preference.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9017028, r-squared of 0.8130679, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been an area of fascination for both researchers and laypeople alike. From the catchy cadence of certain names to the stately gravitas of others, the potential influence of a moniker on one's political preference has been a subject of both amusement and serious inquiry. In this vein, our study delves into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the captivating state of New Mexico.
New Mexico, often referred to as the "Land of Enchantment," provides an ideal backdrop for this inquiry, as it brings to mind images of glittering pearls adorning the desert landscape, juxtaposed with the rugged individualism and love of liberty often associated with the Libertarian party. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the curious relationship between a luminous name and a political preference characterized by a desire for personal freedom and limited government intervention.
The allure of investigating such an unexpected connection lies in the potential to uncover the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the mere mention of the name "Pearl" sparks a subconscious affinity for liberty and self-governance in the minds of New Mexicans? Or perhaps there are broader cultural and historical nuances at work that intertwine the popularity of this name with a unique political leaning in the state.
Our study harnesses a rigorous quantitative approach, drawing on data meticulously compiled by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. This allows us to shed light on the statistical significance behind the correlation, uncovering intriguing patterns that may have otherwise remained hidden beneath the surface of electoral data.
As we unmask the unexpected relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting patterns, we invite the reader to share in the sense of astonishment and amusement that accompanied our own journey of discovery. While the gravity of statistical analysis prevails, the whimsical nature of our findings lends a playful charm to the otherwise solemn landscape of political research. In doing so, we aim to demonstrate that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there is still room for delight and surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9017028, highlighting a robust and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation, which accounts for approximately 81.31% of the variance in Libertarian votes, surpassed our initial expectations and left us in awe of the enigmatic influence of nomenclature on political preferences.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed correlation was not just a fluke. In fact, the statistical significance of our findings underscores the legitimacy of this peculiar association, prompting us to consider the potential impact of names on individuals' political predilections with a newfound sense of wonder.

As eloquently depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly depicts the striking positive trend between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Each data point serves as a gleaming testament to the uncanny synchronicity between a name steeped in luster and the political leanings of an enchanting state.

The substantial correlation uncovered in our study reveals an intriguing facet of electoral behavior that blends the whimsical charm of nomenclature with the seemingly weighty realm of political decision-making. This inexplicable connection between the radiance of "Pearl" and the libertarian fervor embraced by some New Mexicans adds a fascinating layer of complexity to the tapestry of political dynamics.

In conclusion, our research unearths a captivating correlation, prompting us to ponder the possibility of hidden influences on individual voting behaviors intertwined with the allure of a resplendent name. These findings beckon further exploration and contemplation, inviting scholars to delve into the tantalizing interplay between names and political choices with a blend of earnest curiosity and light-hearted amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have laid the foundation for understanding the intersection of nomenclature and political preference, setting the stage for our investigation into the mesmerizing connection between the name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. In "Smith and Doe," the authors navigate the intriguing realm of name popularity and its potential impact on individual choices, laying the groundwork for our own exploration. Additionally, "Jones et al." provide an in-depth analysis of political voting patterns in New Mexico, offering valuable insights into the unique dynamics of this captivating state.
Moving beyond the traditional academic literature, non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner and "Nudge" by Thaler and Sunstein offer compelling discussions on the subtle influences shaping human behavior. These sources prompt contemplation of the broader societal forces that could contribute to the unexpected correlation between the name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting tendencies. Furthermore, fictional narratives like "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley and "1984" by George Orwell provide an imaginative backdrop for pondering the complexities of political ideology and individual identity. While diverging from the realm of empirical research, these literary works add a whimsical layer to our scholarly inquiry, inviting us to explore the enigmatic relationship between name popularity and electoral choices from a more abstract perspective.
Extending our review beyond the realms of traditional academia and literature, our research team has undertaken an unconventional approach to gather insights into the captivating correlation at hand. By perusing a diverse array of sources, including vintage cookbooks, retrograde astrology manuals, and even reading CVS receipts, we have humorously transcended the standard boundaries of scholarly investigation. These foundational texts have provided us with a comical backdrop to our serious exploration, reminding us that even in the rigorous pursuit of knowledge, there is ample room for levity and unexpected amusement.
Our literature review thus showcases the range of sources that have informed our study, from established academic research to eclectic and humorous inspirations. By incorporating this diverse array of perspectives, we aim to infuse our empirical analysis with a delightful touch of whimsy, acknowledging that even the most serious endeavors can be enlivened by the unexpected and the absurd.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9017028, highlighting a robust and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation, which accounts for approximately 81.31% of the variance in Libertarian votes, surpassed our initial expectations and left us in awe of the enigmatic influence of nomenclature on political preferences.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed correlation was not just a fluke. In fact, the statistical significance of our findings underscores the legitimacy of this peculiar association, prompting us to consider the potential impact of names on individuals' political predilections with a newfound sense of wonder.
As eloquently depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly depicts the striking positive trend between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Each data point serves as a gleaming testament to the uncanny synchronicity between a name steeped in luster and the political leanings of an enchanting state.
The substantial correlation uncovered in our study reveals an intriguing facet of electoral behavior that blends the whimsical charm of nomenclature with the seemingly weighty realm of political decision-making. This inexplicable connection between the radiance of "Pearl" and the libertarian fervor embraced by some New Mexicans adds a fascinating layer of complexity to the tapestry of political dynamics.
In conclusion, our research unearths a captivating correlation, prompting us to ponder the possibility of hidden influences on individual voting behaviors intertwined with the allure of a resplendent name. These findings beckon further exploration and contemplation, inviting scholars to delve into the tantalizing interplay between names and political choices with a blend of earnest curiosity and light-hearted amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study illuminate a compelling connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico, corroborating the findings of previous research in an unexpected and delightful manner. Our research builds upon the foundation laid by earlier studies, infusing the exploration of nomenclature and political preference with a touch of whimsy and wonder.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9017028, with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), underscores the striking relationship between the name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting tendencies. This robust correlation mirrors the enthralling insights offered by "Smith and Doe," who astutely highlighted the potential impact of name popularity on individual choices. The unexpected convergence of a shimmering name and political penchant aligns with the engaging narratives of Levitt and Dubner in "Freakonomics" and Thaler and Sunstein in "Nudge," painting a vivid portrait of the nuanced forces shaping human behavior. Additionally, the comical backdrop of our literature review, inspired by vintage cookbooks and retrograde astrology manuals, serves as a lighthearted testament to the unexpected sources of inspiration that can enrich scholarly inquiry.

The substantial correlation uncovered in our investigation evokes a sense of astonishment akin to stumbling upon a breathtaking pearl in an unsuspecting oyster. The glittering allure of the name "Pearl" appears to have woven its enchanting spell on the political landscape of New Mexico, captivating voters with a shimmering appeal that transcends conventional political influences. This unexpected connection not only deepens our understanding of electoral behavior but also adds a whimsical layer to the tapestry of political dynamics, inviting us to ponder the intricate interplay between nomenclature and political choices with a blend of earnest curiosity and light-hearted amusement.

Our findings extend a compelling invitation to further exploration, beckoning scholars to delve into the tantalizing interplay between names and political choices with a playful spirit of inquiry. The resplendent name "Pearl" stands as a glittering emblem of this captivating correlation, reminding us of the delightful surprises that await in the colorful landscape of electoral preferences. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic influences shaping human behavior, we are reminded that even the most serious endeavors can be enlivened by the unexpected and the absurd, casting a brilliant glow upon the scholarly pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Pearl and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
“Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and nomenclature has long been an area of fascination for both researchers and laypeople alike. From the catchy cadence of certain names to the stately gravitas of others, the potential influence of a moniker on one's political preference has been a subject of both amusement and serious inquiry. In this vein, our study delves into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the captivating state of New Mexico.
New Mexico, often referred to as the "Land of Enchantment," provides an ideal backdrop for this inquiry, as it brings to mind images of glittering pearls adorning the desert landscape, juxtaposed with the rugged individualism and love of liberty often associated with the Libertarian party. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the curious relationship between a luminous name and a political preference characterized by a desire for personal freedom and limited government intervention.
The allure of investigating such an unexpected connection lies in the potential to uncover the underlying mechanisms at play. Could it be that the mere mention of the name "Pearl" sparks a subconscious affinity for liberty and self-governance in the minds of New Mexicans? Or perhaps there are broader cultural and historical nuances at work that intertwine the popularity of this name with a unique political leaning in the state.
Our study harnesses a rigorous quantitative approach, drawing on data meticulously compiled by the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. This allows us to shed light on the statistical significance behind the correlation, uncovering intriguing patterns that may have otherwise remained hidden beneath the surface of electoral data.
As we unmask the unexpected relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and Libertarian voting patterns, we invite the reader to share in the sense of astonishment and amusement that accompanied our own journey of discovery. While the gravity of statistical analysis prevails, the whimsical nature of our findings lends a playful charm to the otherwise solemn landscape of political research. In doing so, we aim to demonstrate that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there is still room for delight and surprise.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9017028, highlighting a robust and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation, which accounts for approximately 81.31% of the variance in Libertarian votes, surpassed our initial expectations and left us in awe of the enigmatic influence of nomenclature on political preferences.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed correlation was not just a fluke. In fact, the statistical significance of our findings underscores the legitimacy of this peculiar association, prompting us to consider the potential impact of names on individuals' political predilections with a newfound sense of wonder.
As eloquently depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly depicts the striking positive trend between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Each data point serves as a gleaming testament to the uncanny synchronicity between a name steeped in luster and the political leanings of an enchanting state.
The substantial correlation uncovered in our study reveals an intriguing facet of electoral behavior that blends the whimsical charm of nomenclature with the seemingly weighty realm of political decision-making. This inexplicable connection between the radiance of "Pearl" and the libertarian fervor embraced by some New Mexicans adds a fascinating layer of complexity to the tapestry of political dynamics.
In conclusion, our research unearths a captivating correlation, prompting us to ponder the possibility of hidden influences on individual voting behaviors intertwined with the allure of a resplendent name. These findings beckon further exploration and contemplation, inviting scholars to delve into the tantalizing interplay between names and political choices with a blend of earnest curiosity and light-hearted amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the enthralling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico has illuminated a remarkable and statistically significant association. The magnetic allure of the name "Pearl" seems to have cast its shimmering spell on the political preferences of New Mexicans, as evidenced by the robust correlation coefficient and compelling p-value uncovered in our study. The whimsical charm of this unexpected connection adds a touch of delight to the otherwise serious realm of political research, prompting us to view the landscape of electoral behavior through a lens of sparkling curiosity.

The dramatic narrative woven by the scatterplot in Figure 1 captures the captivating dance between the popularity of the name "Pearl" and the fervent embrace of libertarian ideals in the Land of Enchantment, painting a portrait of luminous synchronicity that defies conventional explanation. While the solemnity of statistical analysis prevails, the eccentric nature of our findings invites us to revel in the playful enigma of nomenclatural influence on political predilections.

As we draw the curtain on this captivating exploration, it becomes clear that the correlation between the iridescent name "Pearl" and the libertarian sentiment in New Mexico adds a touch of whimsy to the otherwise staid domain of electoral dynamics. While the statistical rigor of our study remains unassailable, the irresistible charm of this unexpected correlation underscores the perpetual dance between the scholarly pursuit of knowledge and the elusive, sparkling magic of human behavior.

Therefore, it is our resolute assertion that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between the glistening name "Pearl" and the libertarian leanings of New Mexicans stands as a beacon of captivating intrigue, beckoning scholars to contemplate the enigmatic interplay of nomenclature and political preference with a twinkle in their eye and a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whims of electoral behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited “Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Electrifying Socio-Political Associations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited “Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment”. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quantitative Liberty Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled “Libertarian Leaps: The Electrifying Association Between 'Pearl' and Political Preference in the Land of Enchantment” with an abstract of This study endeavors to uncover the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Pearl" and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in New Mexico. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we observed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9017028 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01) from 1976 to 2020. Our findings shed light on the enthralling relationship between the lustrous name "Pearl" and political preferences in the enchanting landscape of New Mexico. The results, though humorous at first glance, cast a revealing light on the quirky dynamics of political choice and nomenclature.

ChatGPT:

- "Pearl" name popularity
- Libertarian presidential candidate New Mexico
- US Social Security Administration data
- MIT Election Data and Science Lab
- Harvard Dataverse
- political preference New Mexico
- "Pearl" name correlation with political preference
- quirky dynamics of political choice
- nomenclature and political preferences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Pearl
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Pearl
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Pearl

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico

Correlation r = 0.9017028 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8130679 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Pearl) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.1E-5. 0.0000611568836109697200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0061% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,351 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Pearl (Babies born)149174169148157175200196259368549351
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico (Percentage of votes)0.2664490.956740.8668860.6459690.283340.5387770.3437990.3149530.2924743.545489.337241.36206




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([149,174,169,148,157,175,200,196,259,368,549,351,])
array_2 = np.array([0.266449,0.95674,0.866886,0.645969,0.28334,0.538777,0.343799,0.314953,0.292474,3.54548,9.33724,1.36206,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Pearl"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in New Mexico"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4301 · Black Variable ID: 3829 · Red Variable ID: 26140
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0