about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,361 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and the second variable is Number of websites on the internet.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people embraced libertarianism in Arkansas, there was a sudden surge in individuals advocating for internet freedom. This led to a frenzy of website creation, as everyone exercised their right to an online platform to express their views. It was a virtual gold rush, with web developers and tech-savvy libertarians banding together to expand the digital frontier. It just go to show, when it comes to web domination, the possibilities are endless when you let your libertarian spirit soar.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a futuristic, high-tech cityscape set in Arkansas, showcasing a wave of libertarian support. The skyline should be filled with sleek, modern buildings, illuminated by neon lights and holographic displays. Amidst the city, depict a group of tech-savvy libertarians collaborating on cutting-edge digital projects, while a surge of websites materializes around them, representing the growing advocacy for internet freedom. The scene should convey a sense of innovation and progress as the libertarian spirit converges with the digital frontier. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Cutsy art illustration Steampunk Woodblock painting Psychedelic
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet, in the following situation: As more people embraced libertarianism in Arkansas, there was a sudden surge in individuals advocating for internet freedom. This led to a frenzy of website creation, as everyone exercised their right to an online platform to express their views. It was a virtual gold rush, with web developers and tech-savvy libertarians banding together to expand the digital frontier. It just go to show, when it comes to web domination, the possibilities are endless when you let your libertarian spirit soar.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Arkansas, a wave of libertarian support swept through as more people cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, the internet landscape flourished with a surge of websites being created, reflecting the growing advocacy for internet freedom. Web developers and tech-savvy libertarians joined forces to expand the digital frontier, symbolizing the endless possibilities when libertarian spirit meets the online realm.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Arkansas, a wave of libertarian support swept through as more people cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, the internet landscape flourished with a surge of websites being created, reflecting the growing advocacy for internet freedom. Web developers and tech-savvy libertarians joined forces to expand the digital frontier, symbolizing the endless possibilities when libertarian spirit meets the online realm. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a futuristic, high-tech cityscape set in Arkansas, showcasing a wave of libertarian support. The skyline should be filled with sleek, modern buildings, illuminated by neon lights and holographic displays. Amidst the city, depict a group of tech-savvy libertarians collaborating on cutting-edge digital projects, while a surge of websites materializes around them, representing the growing advocacy for internet freedom. The scene should convey a sense of innovation and progress as the libertarian spirit converges with the digital frontier.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas caused Number of websites on the internet to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet

Journal of Internet Anarchy and Freedom

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The concept of democracy, freedom, and electoral choices has long been a subject of fascination for scholars, politicians, and curious minds alike. With the advent of the internet, the interplay between political preferences and digital expansion has become an increasingly intriguing terrain for exploration. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigma of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. As we embark on this journey, we find ourselves navigating through the labyrinth of data, navigating the twists and turns of statistical analyses, and unearthing unexpected correlations that shed light on the interwoven tapestry of politics and cyberspace.

Our foray into this uncharted realm requires an unwavering commitment to rigorous empirical investigation. The use of esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats has provided us with a solid foundation for our exploration. Through the careful assembly of electoral data from 1991 to 2018 and the examination of the exponential growth of the internet, we have harnessed the power of numbers to uncover compelling connections that challenge conventional wisdom.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 that emerged from our analysis cannot be overlooked. Coupled with a striking significance level of p < 0.01, these findings have propelled us into the realm of substantial inferences and tantalizing implications. The correlation we have uncovered stands as a testament to the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, a dance that captivates the imagination and defies easy explanations.

As we delve into this enthralling domain, we are reminded of the quip that "correlation does not imply causation," a cautionary note that lingers in the background as we navigate the twists and turns of our data. Yet, the sheer magnitude of the correlation we have uncovered beckons us to ponder an alternative perspective: what if the virtual landscape of the internet, with its boundless array of websites, mirrors the kaleidoscopic panorama of voter preferences in Arkansas? Could it be that the expansive reach of the web and the libertarian spirit share a remarkable synchronicity that eludes mere chance?

In our quest to explore the interconnected strands of electoral choices and the virtual realm, we find ourselves at the crossroads of political fervor and digital expansion. The world wide web of liberty beckons us to ponder the web of correlations that underpin this intricate tapestry. As we march forward, armed with statistical tools, a flair for freedom, and a penchant for pixels, we stand poised to unravel the hidden connections that weave the fabric of our political and virtual realities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The concept of democracy, freedom, and electoral choices has long been a subject of fascination for scholars, politicians, and curious minds alike. With the advent of the internet, the interplay between political preferences and digital expansion has become an increasingly intriguing terrain for exploration. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigma of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. As we embark on this journey, we find ourselves navigating through the labyrinth of data, navigating the twists and turns of statistical analyses, and unearthing unexpected correlations that shed light on the interwoven tapestry of politics and cyberspace.
Our foray into this uncharted realm requires an unwavering commitment to rigorous empirical investigation. The use of esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats has provided us with a solid foundation for our exploration. Through the careful assembly of electoral data from 1991 to 2018 and the examination of the exponential growth of the internet, we have harnessed the power of numbers to uncover compelling connections that challenge conventional wisdom.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 that emerged from our analysis cannot be overlooked. Coupled with a striking significance level of p < 0.01, these findings have propelled us into the realm of substantial inferences and tantalizing implications. The correlation we have uncovered stands as a testament to the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, a dance that captivates the imagination and defies easy explanations.
As we delve into this enthralling domain, we are reminded of the quip that "correlation does not imply causation," a cautionary note that lingers in the background as we navigate the twists and turns of our data. Yet, the sheer magnitude of the correlation we have uncovered beckons us to ponder an alternative perspective: what if the virtual landscape of the internet, with its boundless array of websites, mirrors the kaleidoscopic panorama of voter preferences in Arkansas? Could it be that the expansive reach of the web and the libertarian spirit share a remarkable synchronicity that eludes mere chance?
In our quest to explore the interconnected strands of electoral choices and the virtual realm, we find ourselves at the crossroads of political fervor and digital expansion. The world wide web of liberty beckons us to ponder the web of correlations that underpin this intricate tapestry. As we march forward, armed with statistical tools, a flair for freedom, and a penchant for pixels, we stand poised to unravel the hidden connections that weave the fabric of our political and virtual realities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet has elicited both scholarly interest and bemused curiosity within the academic community. With a multitude of studies casting their gaze upon the realm of electoral preferences and digital expansion, a confluence of data and analysis has contributed to the tapestry of knowledge on this subject.

In "Election Dynamics and Online Presence," Smith et al. scrutinize the electoral landscape and the virtual footprint of political movements in a comprehensive analysis that spans over a decade. Their findings hint at a nexus between votes for third-party candidates and the proliferation of websites, prompting contemplation on the enigmatic allure of cyber advocacy.

Similarly, Doe and Jones delve into the intricacies of internet growth and electoral proclivities in their seminal work "Cyber Ballots and Bytes." Their astute examination of online behavior and voting patterns captures the imaginations of readers, as they beckon us to ponder the extent to which the digital domain mirrors the ebb and flow of political tides.

Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, the works of "The World Wide Web and Political Realities" by Lorem and Ipsum provide a thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between cybernetic landscapes and political preferences, laying a foundation for deeper inquiry into the marriage of liberty and digital expanses.

Meanwhile, within the realm of fiction, the allegorical insights of "Web of Liberty: A Tale of Technological Triumph" by Novel Author and "The Cyber Candidate Chronicles" by Saga Writer offer metaphorical reflections on the interplay between the free-spirited ethos of libertarianism and the boundless potential of virtual realms.

Beyond the bounds of traditional academia, influences from popular culture have also crept into the periphery of our inquiries. Analyzing the adventures of "The Cyber Crusader" and "The Web Warriors" in animated series and children's shows, we glean unexpected parallels between virtual heroism and the crusade for political freedoms, underscoring the playful complexities that underpin our exploration.

In the twilight realm where statistical analyses intersect with whimsical interpretations, our journey through the tangled web of electoral choices and digital expanse takes on a spirited form, fostering a merry dance of inquiry and discovery that transcends the ordinary confines of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats . You used data from 1991 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The concept of democracy, freedom, and electoral choices has long been a subject of fascination for scholars, politicians, and curious minds alike. With the advent of the internet, the interplay between political preferences and digital expansion has become an increasingly intriguing terrain for exploration. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigma of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. As we embark on this journey, we find ourselves navigating through the labyrinth of data, navigating the twists and turns of statistical analyses, and unearthing unexpected correlations that shed light on the interwoven tapestry of politics and cyberspace.
Our foray into this uncharted realm requires an unwavering commitment to rigorous empirical investigation. The use of esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats has provided us with a solid foundation for our exploration. Through the careful assembly of electoral data from 1991 to 2018 and the examination of the exponential growth of the internet, we have harnessed the power of numbers to uncover compelling connections that challenge conventional wisdom.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 that emerged from our analysis cannot be overlooked. Coupled with a striking significance level of p < 0.01, these findings have propelled us into the realm of substantial inferences and tantalizing implications. The correlation we have uncovered stands as a testament to the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, a dance that captivates the imagination and defies easy explanations.
As we delve into this enthralling domain, we are reminded of the quip that "correlation does not imply causation," a cautionary note that lingers in the background as we navigate the twists and turns of our data. Yet, the sheer magnitude of the correlation we have uncovered beckons us to ponder an alternative perspective: what if the virtual landscape of the internet, with its boundless array of websites, mirrors the kaleidoscopic panorama of voter preferences in Arkansas? Could it be that the expansive reach of the web and the libertarian spirit share a remarkable synchronicity that eludes mere chance?
In our quest to explore the interconnected strands of electoral choices and the virtual realm, we find ourselves at the crossroads of political fervor and digital expansion. The world wide web of liberty beckons us to ponder the web of correlations that underpin this intricate tapestry. As we march forward, armed with statistical tools, a flair for freedom, and a penchant for pixels, we stand poised to unravel the hidden connections that weave the fabric of our political and virtual realities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The first step in our research endeavor was to meticulously gather and compile data from a multitude of sources across the expansive landscape of the internet. With a swarm of websites inhabiting the digital universe, akin to stars adorning the night sky, our task required a deft hand in navigating through the celestial cacophony of online data repositories.

We culled information from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, gleaning electoral data registering the magnitude of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas. Concurrently, data on the burgeoning magnitude of websites on the internet was harvested with precision and care, akin to discovering rare and precious artifacts hidden within the virtual expanse.

Statistical Analysis:
Upon the successful retrieval of our data trove, we employed a carefully curated assortment of statistical wizardry to dissect and analyze the interwoven strands of electoral preferences and cybernetic expansion. Our toolkit incorporated a beguiling mix of correlation analyses, time series modeling, and regression techniques, akin to a symphony of mathematical precision executed with the finesse of a virtuoso maestro.

Correlation Coefficient and Significance Level:
The culmination of our statistical odyssey yielded a correlation coefficient that gleamed like a prized jewel amidst the vast sea of numbers. With a coefficient of 0.9867880, our findings evoked a sense of awe akin to discovering a rare, mythical creature within the labyrinthine depths of statistical analysis. Paired with a significance level of p < 0.01, our results resonated with an unmistakable resonance, akin to unlocking the secrets of an ancient crypt.

Temporal Dimensions:
Our examination delved deep into the temporal dimensions, tracing the trajectory of electoral choices and internet expansion from 1991 to 2018. This journey through time bestowed upon us the capacity to witness the ebb and flow of libertarian preferences against the backdrop of cyberspace evolution, akin to observing the cosmic ballet of celestial bodies across the expanse of the night sky.

Limitations and Considerations:
In the pursuit of unveiling the enigmatic relationships between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the proliferation of websites on the internet, we acknowledge the presence of underlying complexities and confounding variables. The tapestry of empirical research is not devoid of hidden knots and concealed threads, each awaiting unraveling with the skill and patience of a master weaver.

With an air of academic gravity and a hint of convoluted humor, our methodology encapsulated the essence of our scholarly pursuit, standing as a testament to the diligently crafted blueprint that guided our exploration into the world wide web of liberty and electoral inclinations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats .

For the time period 1991 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9867880, r-squared of 0.9737506, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The concept of democracy, freedom, and electoral choices has long been a subject of fascination for scholars, politicians, and curious minds alike. With the advent of the internet, the interplay between political preferences and digital expansion has become an increasingly intriguing terrain for exploration. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigma of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. As we embark on this journey, we find ourselves navigating through the labyrinth of data, navigating the twists and turns of statistical analyses, and unearthing unexpected correlations that shed light on the interwoven tapestry of politics and cyberspace.
Our foray into this uncharted realm requires an unwavering commitment to rigorous empirical investigation. The use of esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats has provided us with a solid foundation for our exploration. Through the careful assembly of electoral data from 1991 to 2018 and the examination of the exponential growth of the internet, we have harnessed the power of numbers to uncover compelling connections that challenge conventional wisdom.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 that emerged from our analysis cannot be overlooked. Coupled with a striking significance level of p < 0.01, these findings have propelled us into the realm of substantial inferences and tantalizing implications. The correlation we have uncovered stands as a testament to the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, a dance that captivates the imagination and defies easy explanations.
As we delve into this enthralling domain, we are reminded of the quip that "correlation does not imply causation," a cautionary note that lingers in the background as we navigate the twists and turns of our data. Yet, the sheer magnitude of the correlation we have uncovered beckons us to ponder an alternative perspective: what if the virtual landscape of the internet, with its boundless array of websites, mirrors the kaleidoscopic panorama of voter preferences in Arkansas? Could it be that the expansive reach of the web and the libertarian spirit share a remarkable synchronicity that eludes mere chance?
In our quest to explore the interconnected strands of electoral choices and the virtual realm, we find ourselves at the crossroads of political fervor and digital expansion. The world wide web of liberty beckons us to ponder the web of correlations that underpin this intricate tapestry. As we march forward, armed with statistical tools, a flair for freedom, and a penchant for pixels, we stand poised to unravel the hidden connections that weave the fabric of our political and virtual realities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analyses conducted on the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats yielded intriguing results. Our investigation uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 indicates a robust relationship between these two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9737506 illustrates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of websites on the internet can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Arkansas. These findings were found to be statistically significant at p < 0.01, underscoring the strength and reliability of the observed relationship.

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually illustrates the close association between the voting patterns and the proliferation of websites on the internet. This striking correlation challenges conventional expectations and prompts a reconsideration of the intricate dynamics at play in the realm of political choices and cyberspace expansion.

Our findings pave the way for a new perspective on the interplay between individual preferences and digital landscapes. The depth and strength of the correlation invite contemplation on the underlying forces that synchronize the libertarian spirit with the virtual expanse of the internet. As we unravel the complex web of correlations, we are reminded of the subtle interconnections that shape our political and virtual realities, hinting at a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

In summary, our research has brought to light a compelling association between the electoral preferences in Arkansas and the growth of the internet, presenting a notable correlation that carries intriguing implications for our understanding of the interwoven strands of political ideologies and digital realms. These findings stand as a testament to the enthralling dance between politics and cyberspace, inviting further exploration and contemplation of the unseen threads that bind our political choices with the virtual veracity of the world wide web.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet has elicited both scholarly interest and bemused curiosity within the academic community. With a multitude of studies casting their gaze upon the realm of electoral preferences and digital expansion, a confluence of data and analysis has contributed to the tapestry of knowledge on this subject.
In "Election Dynamics and Online Presence," Smith et al. scrutinize the electoral landscape and the virtual footprint of political movements in a comprehensive analysis that spans over a decade. Their findings hint at a nexus between votes for third-party candidates and the proliferation of websites, prompting contemplation on the enigmatic allure of cyber advocacy.
Similarly, Doe and Jones delve into the intricacies of internet growth and electoral proclivities in their seminal work "Cyber Ballots and Bytes." Their astute examination of online behavior and voting patterns captures the imaginations of readers, as they beckon us to ponder the extent to which the digital domain mirrors the ebb and flow of political tides.
Turning to the world of non-fiction literature, the works of "The World Wide Web and Political Realities" by Lorem and Ipsum provide a thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between cybernetic landscapes and political preferences, laying a foundation for deeper inquiry into the marriage of liberty and digital expanses.
Meanwhile, within the realm of fiction, the allegorical insights of "Web of Liberty: A Tale of Technological Triumph" by Novel Author and "The Cyber Candidate Chronicles" by Saga Writer offer metaphorical reflections on the interplay between the free-spirited ethos of libertarianism and the boundless potential of virtual realms.
Beyond the bounds of traditional academia, influences from popular culture have also crept into the periphery of our inquiries. Analyzing the adventures of "The Cyber Crusader" and "The Web Warriors" in animated series and children's shows, we glean unexpected parallels between virtual heroism and the crusade for political freedoms, underscoring the playful complexities that underpin our exploration.
In the twilight realm where statistical analyses intersect with whimsical interpretations, our journey through the tangled web of electoral choices and digital expanse takes on a spirited form, fostering a merry dance of inquiry and discovery that transcends the ordinary confines of academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analyses conducted on the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats yielded intriguing results. Our investigation uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 indicates a robust relationship between these two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9737506 illustrates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of websites on the internet can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Arkansas. These findings were found to be statistically significant at p < 0.01, underscoring the strength and reliability of the observed relationship.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually illustrates the close association between the voting patterns and the proliferation of websites on the internet. This striking correlation challenges conventional expectations and prompts a reconsideration of the intricate dynamics at play in the realm of political choices and cyberspace expansion.
Our findings pave the way for a new perspective on the interplay between individual preferences and digital landscapes. The depth and strength of the correlation invite contemplation on the underlying forces that synchronize the libertarian spirit with the virtual expanse of the internet. As we unravel the complex web of correlations, we are reminded of the subtle interconnections that shape our political and virtual realities, hinting at a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.
In summary, our research has brought to light a compelling association between the electoral preferences in Arkansas and the growth of the internet, presenting a notable correlation that carries intriguing implications for our understanding of the interwoven strands of political ideologies and digital realms. These findings stand as a testament to the enthralling dance between politics and cyberspace, inviting further exploration and contemplation of the unseen threads that bind our political choices with the virtual veracity of the world wide web.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation (r = 0.9867880) we discovered between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet aligns with and expands upon the existing body of literature that has touched upon this unique and quirky relationship. As we delve into the realm of intertwining political proclivities and digital expanses, our findings validate and build upon the scholarly and not-so-scholarly works that have mulled over the enigmatic dance between cyber advocacy and electoral choices.

The wistful tales of "The Web Warriors" and "The Cyber Candidate Chronicles" may have initially seemed fanciful in their metaphorical reflections on the interconnectedness of virtual realms and the ethos of libertarianism. However, our empirical investigation echoes and amplifies the sentiments expressed in these narratives, as we chart a landscape where the libertarian spirit and the virtual expanse stand intertwined in a manner that transcends mere coincidence. In doing so, we extract meaningful insight not just from serious academia, but also from the unlikeliest sources of inspiration, weaving a narrative that mirrors the playful complexities that underpin our exploration.

The link between the electoral choices in Arkansas and the digital domain resonates far beyond the mere whimsy of fiction, extending into the illustrative realm where statistical analyses intersect with unforeseen revelations. Through the lens of our research, we underscore the intriguing parallels between the digital crusades for political freedom and the virtual heroism that underlies our perusal of statistical accuracy and academic precision.

The dance between political preferences and virtual expanses, painted in Fig. 1's scatterplot, challenges preconceived notions and prompts a reconsideration of the interconnected dynamics at play. This is a testament to the intricate tapestry that interweaves political ideologies and digital realities, hinting at unseen threads that bind our political choices with the virtual veracity of the World Wide Web.

In unraveling this delightful mystery, we find that our scholarly journey has taken on a spirited form, fostering a merry dance of inquiry and discovery that transcends the ordinary confines of academic discourse. And so, as we navigate through the delightful maze of internet data and electoral preferences, we embrace the whimsy and wonder that come with the unexpected correlations that underpin our scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.

As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The concept of democracy, freedom, and electoral choices has long been a subject of fascination for scholars, politicians, and curious minds alike. With the advent of the internet, the interplay between political preferences and digital expansion has become an increasingly intriguing terrain for exploration. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigma of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. As we embark on this journey, we find ourselves navigating through the labyrinth of data, navigating the twists and turns of statistical analyses, and unearthing unexpected correlations that shed light on the interwoven tapestry of politics and cyberspace.
Our foray into this uncharted realm requires an unwavering commitment to rigorous empirical investigation. The use of esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats has provided us with a solid foundation for our exploration. Through the careful assembly of electoral data from 1991 to 2018 and the examination of the exponential growth of the internet, we have harnessed the power of numbers to uncover compelling connections that challenge conventional wisdom.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 that emerged from our analysis cannot be overlooked. Coupled with a striking significance level of p < 0.01, these findings have propelled us into the realm of substantial inferences and tantalizing implications. The correlation we have uncovered stands as a testament to the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, a dance that captivates the imagination and defies easy explanations.
As we delve into this enthralling domain, we are reminded of the quip that "correlation does not imply causation," a cautionary note that lingers in the background as we navigate the twists and turns of our data. Yet, the sheer magnitude of the correlation we have uncovered beckons us to ponder an alternative perspective: what if the virtual landscape of the internet, with its boundless array of websites, mirrors the kaleidoscopic panorama of voter preferences in Arkansas? Could it be that the expansive reach of the web and the libertarian spirit share a remarkable synchronicity that eludes mere chance?
In our quest to explore the interconnected strands of electoral choices and the virtual realm, we find ourselves at the crossroads of political fervor and digital expansion. The world wide web of liberty beckons us to ponder the web of correlations that underpin this intricate tapestry. As we march forward, armed with statistical tools, a flair for freedom, and a penchant for pixels, we stand poised to unravel the hidden connections that weave the fabric of our political and virtual realities.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analyses conducted on the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats yielded intriguing results. Our investigation uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. The correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 indicates a robust relationship between these two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9737506 illustrates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of websites on the internet can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Arkansas. These findings were found to be statistically significant at p < 0.01, underscoring the strength and reliability of the observed relationship.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually illustrates the close association between the voting patterns and the proliferation of websites on the internet. This striking correlation challenges conventional expectations and prompts a reconsideration of the intricate dynamics at play in the realm of political choices and cyberspace expansion.
Our findings pave the way for a new perspective on the interplay between individual preferences and digital landscapes. The depth and strength of the correlation invite contemplation on the underlying forces that synchronize the libertarian spirit with the virtual expanse of the internet. As we unravel the complex web of correlations, we are reminded of the subtle interconnections that shape our political and virtual realities, hinting at a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.
In summary, our research has brought to light a compelling association between the electoral preferences in Arkansas and the growth of the internet, presenting a notable correlation that carries intriguing implications for our understanding of the interwoven strands of political ideologies and digital realms. These findings stand as a testament to the enthralling dance between politics and cyberspace, inviting further exploration and contemplation of the unseen threads that bind our political choices with the virtual veracity of the world wide web.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a robust correlation between the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arkansas and the number of websites on the internet. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 underscore the strength and reliability of this relationship. The r-squared value of 0.9737506 further highlights the substantial proportion of the variance in the number of websites on the internet explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Arkansas. These findings provoke contemplation on the intricate dynamics at play in the realm of political choices and cyberspace expansion.

As we navigate this interconnected web of data, it is important to acknowledge the adage that "correlation does not imply causation." While this cautionary note rings like an alarm in the halls of academia, it cannot mask the sheer magnitude of the correlation we have uncovered. The entwined dance between political ideologies and the digital domain beckons us to ponder the whimsical synchronicity that underpins this relationship. Could it be that the fervor for individual liberty and the exponential growth of the internet share a remarkable harmony that defies the laws of probability? Pardon the pun, but it seems that the "world wide web of liberty" extends far beyond a mere play on words.

Our findings invite us to embark on a whimsical journey through the cybernetic landscape, where the convoluted pathways of political preferences intersect with the sprawling expanses of the virtual realm. Armed with the statistical tools in one hand and a penchant for pixels in the other, we unravel a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom that extends its tendrils through the digital ether.

It is our firm belief that this research marks the denouement of this particular inquiry, as we have uncovered a compelling association that beckons us to contemplate the unseen threads that bind our political choices with the virtual veracity of the world wide web. No further research is needed in this area; we have successfully navigated the labyrinth of digital data to shed new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Internet Anarchy and Freedom


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Internet Freedom Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The World Wide Web of Liberty: A Libertarian Perspective on the Correlation between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arkansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet with an abstract of In this study, we venture into the intricate maze of internet data to explore the relationship between electoral preferences and cyberspace expanse. Utilizing data sourced from esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we embarked on an empirical journey through the depths of Arkansas's voting patterns and the exponential growth of the internet. Applying rigorous statistical analyses, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9867880 and a marked significance level of p < 0.01, charting our findings from 1991 to 2018.
As we unveil the interconnected strands of electoral verdicts and the virtual realm, our investigation unpicks the intertwined threads of libertarian choices and the burgeoning web. The data shines a spotlight on the intricate dance between political ideologies and the digital domain, heralding a cybernetic landscape where individual liberty and internet expansion are entangled in ways that extend far beyond the binary of zeros and ones. With this exploration, we shed a new light on the intertwined world of political preferences and virtual veracity, revealing a tapestry woven with a flair for freedom and a penchant for pixels.

ChatGPT:

"libertarian presidential candidate, Arkansas," "relationship between electoral preferences and internet usage," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "Internet Live Stats," "correlation between voting patterns and internet growth," "statistical analysis of voting and internet data," "political ideologies and digital domain," "individual liberty and internet expansion," "political preferences and internet usage"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas

Number of websites on the internet
Detailed data title: Number of websites, measured by unique hostnames
Source: Internet Live Stats
See what else correlates with Number of websites on the internet

Correlation r = 0.9867880 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9737506 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of websites on the internet) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas) over the 6 years from 1991 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000261. 0.0002606807389411005000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.0261% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,836 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199620002004200820122016
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas (Total votes)30762781235247761627629829
Number of websites on the internet (Websites)25760117087200516116001723390006970890001045530000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3076,2781,2352,4776,16276,29829,])
array_2 = np.array([257601,17087200,51611600,172339000,697089000,1045530000,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Number of websites on the internet"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4361 · Black Variable ID: 25953 · Red Variable ID: 370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0