about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,386 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of postal service clerks in Florida.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of postal service clerks in Florida increases, so does the amount of pun mail being sorted and delivered. This influx of witty wordplay and sassy semantics seeps into the creative subconscious of the minutephysics team, leading to a surge in provocatively titled videos. It's a chain reaction of linguistic levity - the postage professionals are quite literally delivering the 'package' of provocative phrasing to the YouTube algorithms.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Scalar art ] Generate an image of a vibrant Florida post office with multiple clerks working diligently behind the counters, while long lines of customers eagerly await their turn. The atmosphere is bustling and filled with energy as the clerks sort through piles of mail, some of which are adorned with clever puns and funny wordplay. Nearby, the minutephysics team's workspace is visible, with a whiteboard filled with brainstormed YouTube video titles that match the cleverness of the puns on the envelopes. Capture the flow of creativity as the energy of the postal workers seems to inspire the team's creative process, leading them to craft more and more provocatively titled videos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Futuristic Cutsy graphics Scalar art Glitch art
ChatGPT: Scalar art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida, in the following situation: As the number of postal service clerks in Florida increases, so does the amount of pun mail being sorted and delivered. This influx of witty wordplay and sassy semantics seeps into the creative subconscious of the minutephysics team, leading to a surge in provocatively titled videos. It's a chain reaction of linguistic levity - the postage professionals are quite literally delivering the 'package' of provocative phrasing to the YouTube algorithms.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bustling Florida post office with an increasing number of clerks serving long lines of customers. As the clerks sort through piles of mail, they come across envelopes adorned with clever puns and funny wordplay. Meanwhile, nearby the minutephysics team's workspace, the whiteboard is filled with brainstormed YouTube video titles that match the cleverness of the puns on the envelopes. The energy of the postal workers seems to flow into the creative process, as the team crafts more and more provocatively titled videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: A bustling Florida post office with an increasing number of clerks serving long lines of customers. As the clerks sort through piles of mail, they come across envelopes adorned with clever puns and funny wordplay. Meanwhile, nearby the minutephysics team's workspace, the whiteboard is filled with brainstormed YouTube video titles that match the cleverness of the puns on the envelopes. The energy of the postal workers seems to flow into the creative process, as the team crafts more and more provocatively titled videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Scalar art ] Generate an image of a vibrant Florida post office with multiple clerks working diligently behind the counters, while long lines of customers eagerly await their turn. The atmosphere is bustling and filled with energy as the clerks sort through piles of mail, some of which are adorned with clever puns and funny wordplay. Nearby, the minutephysics team's workspace is visible, with a whiteboard filled with brainstormed YouTube video titles that match the cleverness of the puns on the envelopes. Capture the flow of creativity as the energy of the postal workers seems to inspire the team's creative process, leading them to craft more and more provocatively titled videos.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are caused The number of postal service clerks in Florida to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8281862 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In a world where the laws of physics collide with the everyday hustle and bustle, we find ourselves in a peculiar quandary - the enigmatic connection between the eye-catching titles of minutephysics YouTube videos and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. The colorful and often quizzical titles, such as "The Secret of Bicycles - Lorentz Transformation," and "Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?" have drawn inquisitive minds from all corners of the internet. Yet, who would have thought that these titillating titles could have any bearing on the labor force of postal clerks in the Sunshine State? It seems that even Schrödinger would have a hard time wrapping his head around this peculiar paradox, where the whimsical world of physics intersects with the pragmatic world of postal deliveries.

As researchers, we found ourselves unexpectedly lured into this undertow of curiosity, culminating in the desire to discern the underlying forces at play. With an air of skepticism and a twinkle of bemusement, we embarked on a quest to untangle the mystery behind whether the buzz generated by minutephysics titles might be more than just a quantum of amusement, but rather an invisible force at play in the labor market. And lo and behold, what we uncovered is bound to leave even the most stoic physicist raising an inquisitive eyebrow.

Behind the facade of witty wordplay and tongue-twisting titles lay an unexpected revelation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics data for Florida from 2011 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the verve of minutephysics video titles and the number of postal service clerks employed. The correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with a p-value less than 0.01, was, to put it bluntly, mind-boggling. Could it be that the alluring allure of physics riddles is drawing individuals away from the postal service desks and into the ether of scientific contemplation? Or perhaps, the postal clerks are in on the cosmic joke, seeking refuge from the daily grind in the enchanting world of mysterious physics? The possibilities are as infinite as the universe itself.

So, dear reader, join us as we navigate the peculiar interplay of captivating video titles and the labor market, and as we strive to shine a comedic light on the seemingly serious business of physics and employment. Get ready to witness the unexpected as we delve deep into the gravitational pull of minute physics titles, and their unlikely dance with the postal service clerk workforce in the state of Florida.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In a world where the laws of physics collide with the everyday hustle and bustle, we find ourselves in a peculiar quandary - the enigmatic connection between the eye-catching titles of minutephysics YouTube videos and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. The colorful and often quizzical titles, such as "The Secret of Bicycles - Lorentz Transformation," and "Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?" have drawn inquisitive minds from all corners of the internet. Yet, who would have thought that these titillating titles could have any bearing on the labor force of postal clerks in the Sunshine State? It seems that even Schrödinger would have a hard time wrapping his head around this peculiar paradox, where the whimsical world of physics intersects with the pragmatic world of postal deliveries.
As researchers, we found ourselves unexpectedly lured into this undertow of curiosity, culminating in the desire to discern the underlying forces at play. With an air of skepticism and a twinkle of bemusement, we embarked on a quest to untangle the mystery behind whether the buzz generated by minutephysics titles might be more than just a quantum of amusement, but rather an invisible force at play in the labor market. And lo and behold, what we uncovered is bound to leave even the most stoic physicist raising an inquisitive eyebrow.
Behind the facade of witty wordplay and tongue-twisting titles lay an unexpected revelation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics data for Florida from 2011 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the verve of minutephysics video titles and the number of postal service clerks employed. The correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with a p-value less than 0.01, was, to put it bluntly, mind-boggling. Could it be that the alluring allure of physics riddles is drawing individuals away from the postal service desks and into the ether of scientific contemplation? Or perhaps, the postal clerks are in on the cosmic joke, seeking refuge from the daily grind in the enchanting world of mysterious physics? The possibilities are as infinite as the universe itself.
So, dear reader, join us as we navigate the peculiar interplay of captivating video titles and the labor market, and as we strive to shine a comedic light on the seemingly serious business of physics and employment. Get ready to witness the unexpected as we delve deep into the gravitational pull of minute physics titles, and their unlikely dance with the postal service clerk workforce in the state of Florida.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida has been a topic of bemused curiosity and perhaps more than a few raised eyebrows throughout the research community. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study on the impact of attention-grabbing video titles on viewership and engagement, inadvertently setting the stage for our comical exploration. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the psychological aspect of video title attraction, shedding light on the unsuspecting allure of cleverly crafted captions.

As we descend into the rabbit hole of unexpected correlations, it is crucial to acknowledge the work of esteemed scholars such as "Lorem Ipsum: The Art of Dazzling Clickbait" by A. Author (2017) and "The Curious Case of Eye-Catching Titles" by B. Writer (2019). Their contributions have paved the way for the whimsical angle we will be undertaking in this peculiar pursuit of understanding.

As we venture into the realm of less conventional literature, it is worth noting the fictional works that, by title alone, seem to hint at a relation to our topic. "Quantum Quirks: Tales of Time and Space" by C. Novelist and "The Enigma of Enticing Enigmas" by D. Storyteller serve as intriguing examples of imaginative tales that could pertain to the captivating world of physics and its delightful pull on the mind.

Furthermore, in the realm of animated entertainment, certain shows inadvertently touch upon subjects related to our inquiry. The whimsy of "The Magic School Bus" and the scientific ponderings in "Bill Nye the Science Guy" may seem light-hearted on the surface, but their deeper implications on the youthful imagination cannot be overlooked. Who's to say that the gravitational charm of minutephysics titles doesn't extend its reach into the cartoons and children's shows that mold young minds?

With this surprising and cerebral expedition into the humorous corridors of academia, we set the stage for our own journey into the unlikely coherence of minutephysics video titles and the presence of postal service clerks in Florida. As we navigate this lighthearted exploration, it is our hope that the levity of our findings will bring a touch of mirth to the often sober discourse of scholarly research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In a world where the laws of physics collide with the everyday hustle and bustle, we find ourselves in a peculiar quandary - the enigmatic connection between the eye-catching titles of minutephysics YouTube videos and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. The colorful and often quizzical titles, such as "The Secret of Bicycles - Lorentz Transformation," and "Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?" have drawn inquisitive minds from all corners of the internet. Yet, who would have thought that these titillating titles could have any bearing on the labor force of postal clerks in the Sunshine State? It seems that even Schrödinger would have a hard time wrapping his head around this peculiar paradox, where the whimsical world of physics intersects with the pragmatic world of postal deliveries.
As researchers, we found ourselves unexpectedly lured into this undertow of curiosity, culminating in the desire to discern the underlying forces at play. With an air of skepticism and a twinkle of bemusement, we embarked on a quest to untangle the mystery behind whether the buzz generated by minutephysics titles might be more than just a quantum of amusement, but rather an invisible force at play in the labor market. And lo and behold, what we uncovered is bound to leave even the most stoic physicist raising an inquisitive eyebrow.
Behind the facade of witty wordplay and tongue-twisting titles lay an unexpected revelation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics data for Florida from 2011 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the verve of minutephysics video titles and the number of postal service clerks employed. The correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with a p-value less than 0.01, was, to put it bluntly, mind-boggling. Could it be that the alluring allure of physics riddles is drawing individuals away from the postal service desks and into the ether of scientific contemplation? Or perhaps, the postal clerks are in on the cosmic joke, seeking refuge from the daily grind in the enchanting world of mysterious physics? The possibilities are as infinite as the universe itself.
So, dear reader, join us as we navigate the peculiar interplay of captivating video titles and the labor market, and as we strive to shine a comedic light on the seemingly serious business of physics and employment. Get ready to witness the unexpected as we delve deep into the gravitational pull of minute physics titles, and their unlikely dance with the postal service clerk workforce in the state of Florida.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the bizarre connection between minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida, this study employed a multidisciplinary methodology, reflecting the whimsically intricate nature of the research question.

Firstly, a comprehensive database of minutephysics video titles was amassed using AI-enabled web scraping techniques, capturing thousands of titles from 2011 to 2022. Each title was meticulously categorized based on its level of provocativeness, measured by the frequency of enigmatic words such as "uncertainty," "paradox," and "quantum weirdness." These titles were then subjected to a rigorous qualitative analysis, taking into account their ability to pique inquisitiveness, induce curiosity, and provoke amusement.

Simultaneously, data on the number of postal service clerks employed in Florida during the same period was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The employment figures were cross-referenced with external factors such as seasonal fluctuations, postal service innovations, and even the popularity of pineapple on pizza. Only after considering these correlated variables did we ascertain the true impact of minutephysics video titles on postal service clerk employment.

At the crux of our methodology lies the unorthodox approach of straddling the realms of levity and gravity in academia, recognizing the inherent humor in the juxtaposition of physics wit and labor statistics. Commencing with a giddy sense of determination, we navigated through the labyrinthine landscape of data analysis, employing statistical techniques that would make even Pythagoras ponder. With a nuanced blend of regression analyses, time series modeling, and occasional interpretive dance, we endeavored to unravel the improbable entanglement of video titles and workforce dynamics.

Furthermore, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we engaged in an expert panel review composed of esteemed physicists, postal service experts, and a stand-up comedian for good measure. Their diverse perspectives provided invaluable insights, tempering the serious statistical analyses with a dollop of levity and a sprinkling of puns. It was through this rigorous, albeit lighthearted, scrutiny that we sought to corroborate our findings and validate the unexpected correlation between the captivating minutephysics titles and the employment landscape of Florida's postal service.

In sum, our methodological approach may have appeared whimsical, but rest assured, it was underpinned by a steadfast commitment to scientific rigor, albeit with a generous portion of frivolity. The convergence of AI technology, labor statistics, and the occasional quip has illuminated the improbable relationship between video titles and postal service employment in Florida, leaving us to ponder the cosmic conundrum of physics titles and their mysterious magnetism in the labor market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8281862, r-squared of 0.6858923, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In a world where the laws of physics collide with the everyday hustle and bustle, we find ourselves in a peculiar quandary - the enigmatic connection between the eye-catching titles of minutephysics YouTube videos and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. The colorful and often quizzical titles, such as "The Secret of Bicycles - Lorentz Transformation," and "Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?" have drawn inquisitive minds from all corners of the internet. Yet, who would have thought that these titillating titles could have any bearing on the labor force of postal clerks in the Sunshine State? It seems that even Schrödinger would have a hard time wrapping his head around this peculiar paradox, where the whimsical world of physics intersects with the pragmatic world of postal deliveries.
As researchers, we found ourselves unexpectedly lured into this undertow of curiosity, culminating in the desire to discern the underlying forces at play. With an air of skepticism and a twinkle of bemusement, we embarked on a quest to untangle the mystery behind whether the buzz generated by minutephysics titles might be more than just a quantum of amusement, but rather an invisible force at play in the labor market. And lo and behold, what we uncovered is bound to leave even the most stoic physicist raising an inquisitive eyebrow.
Behind the facade of witty wordplay and tongue-twisting titles lay an unexpected revelation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics data for Florida from 2011 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the verve of minutephysics video titles and the number of postal service clerks employed. The correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with a p-value less than 0.01, was, to put it bluntly, mind-boggling. Could it be that the alluring allure of physics riddles is drawing individuals away from the postal service desks and into the ether of scientific contemplation? Or perhaps, the postal clerks are in on the cosmic joke, seeking refuge from the daily grind in the enchanting world of mysterious physics? The possibilities are as infinite as the universe itself.
So, dear reader, join us as we navigate the peculiar interplay of captivating video titles and the labor market, and as we strive to shine a comedic light on the seemingly serious business of physics and employment. Get ready to witness the unexpected as we delve deep into the gravitational pull of minute physics titles, and their unlikely dance with the postal service clerk workforce in the state of Florida.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation between the provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. Over the time period from 2011 to 2022, our findings demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.8281862 and an r-squared of 0.6858923, with a p-value less than 0.01. Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot, providing a visual representation of the robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

The results indicate that there is a significant association between the captivating nature of physics-themed video titles and the employment trends of postal service clerks in Florida. This unexpected connection has left us pondering the intricate ways in which online content may influence labor market dynamics. The allure of intriguing physics riddles appears to have manifested itself in the employment landscape of postal clerks, evoking a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to an entertaining physics demonstration.

Our findings not only underscore the unexpected intersections between seemingly unrelated domains but also invite a humorous perspective on the interplay between the captivating minutephysics video titles and the labor force. The implications of these results extend beyond the boundaries of conventional expectations, and we encourage further exploration of the whimsical world of online content and its unanticipated impact on workforce dynamics.

In conclusion, the correlation identified between provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida adds a whimsical twist to the conventional understanding of labor market influences. This study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which the captivating nature of online content may resonate in unexpected corners of the employment landscape. As we contemplate the enigmatic correlation uncovered, we are left with a sense of wonder and amusement at the intricate relationship between the world of physics titles and the labor force, unearthing unexpected connections that transcend the boundaries of traditional analysis.

Overall, the findings present a comical yet conceptually intriguing insight into the intertwined realms of online physics entertainment and the labor market, offering a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida has been a topic of bemused curiosity and perhaps more than a few raised eyebrows throughout the research community. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study on the impact of attention-grabbing video titles on viewership and engagement, inadvertently setting the stage for our comical exploration. Additionally, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the psychological aspect of video title attraction, shedding light on the unsuspecting allure of cleverly crafted captions.
As we descend into the rabbit hole of unexpected correlations, it is crucial to acknowledge the work of esteemed scholars such as "Lorem Ipsum: The Art of Dazzling Clickbait" by A. Author (2017) and "The Curious Case of Eye-Catching Titles" by B. Writer (2019). Their contributions have paved the way for the whimsical angle we will be undertaking in this peculiar pursuit of understanding.
As we venture into the realm of less conventional literature, it is worth noting the fictional works that, by title alone, seem to hint at a relation to our topic. "Quantum Quirks: Tales of Time and Space" by C. Novelist and "The Enigma of Enticing Enigmas" by D. Storyteller serve as intriguing examples of imaginative tales that could pertain to the captivating world of physics and its delightful pull on the mind.
Furthermore, in the realm of animated entertainment, certain shows inadvertently touch upon subjects related to our inquiry. The whimsy of "The Magic School Bus" and the scientific ponderings in "Bill Nye the Science Guy" may seem light-hearted on the surface, but their deeper implications on the youthful imagination cannot be overlooked. Who's to say that the gravitational charm of minutephysics titles doesn't extend its reach into the cartoons and children's shows that mold young minds?
With this surprising and cerebral expedition into the humorous corridors of academia, we set the stage for our own journey into the unlikely coherence of minutephysics video titles and the presence of postal service clerks in Florida. As we navigate this lighthearted exploration, it is our hope that the levity of our findings will bring a touch of mirth to the often sober discourse of scholarly research.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation between the provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. Over the time period from 2011 to 2022, our findings demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.8281862 and an r-squared of 0.6858923, with a p-value less than 0.01. Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot, providing a visual representation of the robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The results indicate that there is a significant association between the captivating nature of physics-themed video titles and the employment trends of postal service clerks in Florida. This unexpected connection has left us pondering the intricate ways in which online content may influence labor market dynamics. The allure of intriguing physics riddles appears to have manifested itself in the employment landscape of postal clerks, evoking a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to an entertaining physics demonstration.
Our findings not only underscore the unexpected intersections between seemingly unrelated domains but also invite a humorous perspective on the interplay between the captivating minutephysics video titles and the labor force. The implications of these results extend beyond the boundaries of conventional expectations, and we encourage further exploration of the whimsical world of online content and its unanticipated impact on workforce dynamics.
In conclusion, the correlation identified between provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida adds a whimsical twist to the conventional understanding of labor market influences. This study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which the captivating nature of online content may resonate in unexpected corners of the employment landscape. As we contemplate the enigmatic correlation uncovered, we are left with a sense of wonder and amusement at the intricate relationship between the world of physics titles and the labor force, unearthing unexpected connections that transcend the boundaries of traditional analysis.
Overall, the findings present a comical yet conceptually intriguing insight into the intertwined realms of online physics entertainment and the labor market, offering a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings reveal a remarkable connection between the captivating minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. While the correlation may seem as enigmatic as a quantum entanglement, it aligns with previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who touched upon the gripping impact of attention-grabbing captions. This unexpected correlation has left us pondering the quirky ways in which online content may influence labor market dynamics, as though the laws of physics themselves were at play.

The seemingly whimsical tales in the literature review take on a more serious tone when viewed through the lens of our study. The imaginative works of C. Novelist and D. Storyteller, though fictional, bear a striking resemblance to the captivating nature of physics-themed video titles and their influence. Just as these imaginative tales have an enduring allure, the intrigue of minutephysics titles seems to have manifested itself in the employment landscape of postal clerks, evoking a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to an entertaining physics demonstration.

Our results not only shed light on the unexpected intersections between seemingly unrelated domains but also invite a humorous perspective on the interplay between captivating minutephysics video titles and the labor force, adding a peculiar twist to the conventional understanding of labor market influences. This comedic lens offers a refreshing take on the intricate relationship between the world of physics titles and the labor force, unearthing connections that transcend the boundaries of traditional analysis.

In this comical journey through academia, our study serves as a lighthearted divergence from the sober discourse of scholarly research, offering a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we contemplate the enchanting correlation uncovered, we are left with a sense of wonder and amusement at the unexpected relationship between the world of physics titles and the labor force, showcasing the peculiar yet conceptually intriguing insight into the intertwined realms of online physics entertainment and the labor market.

So, while the connection between provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida may seem as outlandish as a physics quirk, our research highlights the unexpected ways in which seemingly disparate entities can intertwine in a way that even Schrödinger's cat would find provocative.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are and The number of postal service clerks in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In a world where the laws of physics collide with the everyday hustle and bustle, we find ourselves in a peculiar quandary - the enigmatic connection between the eye-catching titles of minutephysics YouTube videos and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. The colorful and often quizzical titles, such as "The Secret of Bicycles - Lorentz Transformation," and "Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?" have drawn inquisitive minds from all corners of the internet. Yet, who would have thought that these titillating titles could have any bearing on the labor force of postal clerks in the Sunshine State? It seems that even Schrödinger would have a hard time wrapping his head around this peculiar paradox, where the whimsical world of physics intersects with the pragmatic world of postal deliveries.
As researchers, we found ourselves unexpectedly lured into this undertow of curiosity, culminating in the desire to discern the underlying forces at play. With an air of skepticism and a twinkle of bemusement, we embarked on a quest to untangle the mystery behind whether the buzz generated by minutephysics titles might be more than just a quantum of amusement, but rather an invisible force at play in the labor market. And lo and behold, what we uncovered is bound to leave even the most stoic physicist raising an inquisitive eyebrow.
Behind the facade of witty wordplay and tongue-twisting titles lay an unexpected revelation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics data for Florida from 2011 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the verve of minutephysics video titles and the number of postal service clerks employed. The correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with a p-value less than 0.01, was, to put it bluntly, mind-boggling. Could it be that the alluring allure of physics riddles is drawing individuals away from the postal service desks and into the ether of scientific contemplation? Or perhaps, the postal clerks are in on the cosmic joke, seeking refuge from the daily grind in the enchanting world of mysterious physics? The possibilities are as infinite as the universe itself.
So, dear reader, join us as we navigate the peculiar interplay of captivating video titles and the labor market, and as we strive to shine a comedic light on the seemingly serious business of physics and employment. Get ready to witness the unexpected as we delve deep into the gravitational pull of minute physics titles, and their unlikely dance with the postal service clerk workforce in the state of Florida.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation between the provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida. Over the time period from 2011 to 2022, our findings demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.8281862 and an r-squared of 0.6858923, with a p-value less than 0.01. Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot, providing a visual representation of the robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The results indicate that there is a significant association between the captivating nature of physics-themed video titles and the employment trends of postal service clerks in Florida. This unexpected connection has left us pondering the intricate ways in which online content may influence labor market dynamics. The allure of intriguing physics riddles appears to have manifested itself in the employment landscape of postal clerks, evoking a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to an entertaining physics demonstration.
Our findings not only underscore the unexpected intersections between seemingly unrelated domains but also invite a humorous perspective on the interplay between the captivating minutephysics video titles and the labor force. The implications of these results extend beyond the boundaries of conventional expectations, and we encourage further exploration of the whimsical world of online content and its unanticipated impact on workforce dynamics.
In conclusion, the correlation identified between provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and the number of postal service clerks in Florida adds a whimsical twist to the conventional understanding of labor market influences. This study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which the captivating nature of online content may resonate in unexpected corners of the employment landscape. As we contemplate the enigmatic correlation uncovered, we are left with a sense of wonder and amusement at the intricate relationship between the world of physics titles and the labor force, unearthing unexpected connections that transcend the boundaries of traditional analysis.
Overall, the findings present a comical yet conceptually intriguing insight into the intertwined realms of online physics entertainment and the labor market, offering a whimsical perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the wacky world of physics-based YouTube videos and postal service clerks, our findings have unraveled a correlation that could only be described as positively magnetic. The robust relationship between the captivating titles of minutephysics videos and the employment trends of postal clerks in Florida leaves us pondering the whimsical ways in which online content may influence labor dynamics.

As we wrap up this humorous journey through the intersection of captivating physics titles and the labor force, we find ourselves marveling at the unexpected twists and turns of correlation coefficients and scatterplots. It seems that the allure of mind-bending physics conundrums holds a gravitational pull on the employment landscape, drawing individuals towards scientific contemplation or, perhaps, into the cosmic joke of daily postal delivery.

While the results have left us tickled by the inexplicable dance between minute physics titles and the workforce, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, it's perhaps best to leave this comical correlation as one of the delightful mysteries of the universe – a nugget of amusement nestled amidst the rigors of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quantum Quirkiness Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spinning in Circles: Unraveling the Link between Provocative minutephysics YouTube Video Titles and the Postal Service Clerk Puzzlement in Florida with an abstract of This study delves into the whimsical world of provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles and their surprising correlation with the number of postal service clerks in the state of Florida. With a dash of AI analysis and a sprinkle of Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we set out to untangle this unanticipated connection. Our findings revealed a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8281862, with p < 0.01 from 2011 to 2022, demonstrating the unexpected magnetic attraction between YouTube physics wonders and postal service workload. Join us on this comical journey as we uncover the confounding relationship between the captivating titles of physics videos and the labor force in the Sunshine State.

ChatGPT:

minutephysics, provocative YouTube video titles, postal service clerk, Florida, correlation, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, physics videos, labor force, Sunshine State

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are

The number of postal service clerks in Florida
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of postal service clerks in Florida
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of postal service clerks in Florida

Correlation r = 0.8281862 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6858923 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of postal service clerks in Florida) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00088. 0.0008768980557900447000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.088% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,140 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.48, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are (Provacative score)3.46433.29633.21053.283.17653.6254.291733.83334.534.1
The number of postal service clerks in Florida (Postal Service Clerks)365038003700370036303760386036803840413037603860




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.4643,3.2963,3.2105,3.28,3.1765,3.625,4.2917,3,3.8333,4.5,3,4.1,])
array_2 = np.array([3650,3800,3700,3700,3630,3760,3860,3680,3840,4130,3760,3860,])
array_1_name = "How provocative minutephysics YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of postal service clerks in Florida"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4386 · Black Variable ID: 25519 · Red Variable ID: 6589
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0