about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,393 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Texas and the second variable is Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women.  The chart goes from 1997 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas increased, more and more women were inspired to express their political beauty ideals through the power of Botox. The greater emphasis on individual freedom and limited government intervention naturally translated to a desire for smoother, wrinkle-free expressions of personal choice. This led to a surge in the number of Botox injections administered to women, as they exercised their autonomy to pursue a politically augmented standard of beauty. One could say that as political preferences for minimal regulation grew, so did the collective quest for a truly unfurrowed, laissez-faire visage.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a photo-realistic image of a bustling Texas city street with a subtle visual emphasis on women visiting Botox clinics. Show women of different ages walking into or out of popular Botox clinics, with smooth, wrinkle-free faces and a sense of confidence. In the background, subtly incorporate a nod to increased Libertarian senatorial votes, perhaps through campaign posters, billboards, or mentions in the news broadcast playing on electronic screens. Additionally, depict vibrant surroundings, capturing the essence of a city with a charming Texan flair. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art inspired by bauhaus Celtic art A photo-realistic image Surrealism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women, in the following situation: As the Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas increased, more and more women were inspired to express their political beauty ideals through the power of Botox. The greater emphasis on individual freedom and limited government intervention naturally translated to a desire for smoother, wrinkle-free expressions of personal choice. This led to a surge in the number of Botox injections administered to women, as they exercised their autonomy to pursue a politically augmented standard of beauty. One could say that as political preferences for minimal regulation grew, so did the collective quest for a truly unfurrowed, laissez-faire visage.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Texas, as Libertarian votes for Senators increased, more women flocked to receive Botox injections. The trend reflected a desire for individual freedom and minimal government intervention, as defined lines on ballots were mirrored by smooth, wrinkle-free faces. The surge in Botox injections marked a collective pursuit of a truly unfurrowed, laissez-faire visage.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Texas, as Libertarian votes for Senators increased, more women flocked to receive Botox injections. The trend reflected a desire for individual freedom and minimal government intervention, as defined lines on ballots were mirrored by smooth, wrinkle-free faces. The surge in Botox injections marked a collective pursuit of a truly unfurrowed, laissez-faire visage. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a photo-realistic image of a bustling Texas city street with a subtle visual emphasis on women visiting Botox clinics. Show women of different ages walking into or out of popular Botox clinics, with smooth, wrinkle-free faces and a sense of confidence. In the background, subtly incorporate a nod to increased Libertarian senatorial votes, perhaps through campaign posters, billboards, or mentions in the news broadcast playing on electronic screens. Additionally, depict vibrant surroundings, capturing the essence of a city with a charming Texan flair.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas positively influenced Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women

The Journal of Political Dermatology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 for 1997 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and perhaps even a few skeptics who raise their eyebrows at the premise of this research - welcome to a study that promises to unravel the mysteries of politics and pores. In a world where politics and personal grooming routines might seem like oil and water, we are eager to present our findings that suggest a surprising correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women.

As scholars of statistics, we often find ourselves navigating the labyrinth of data, seeking patterns and connections that may be hiding in plain sight. Little did we anticipate that our quest for numerical relationships would lead us to the realm of cosmetic enhancements. Yet, here we are, poised to examine the peculiar dance between political affiliations and the pursuit of smooth, wrinkle-free skin.

We can already hear the raised eyebrows and wrinkled foreheads of skepticism, and we embrace these reactions with a knowing grin. The intersection of political ideologies and beauty regimens may indeed seem like an unconventional alliance, but as researchers, we thrive on the unexpected and the uncharted. Our analysis promises to inject a dose of levity and curiosity into the often staid world of political science and aesthetic research.

To embark on this unconventional journey, we armed ourselves with data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. This eclectic mix of information formed the canvas on which our statistical brush would paint a picture that raises questions as well as eyebrows.

We acknowledge that the very premise of this study might prompt some to furrow their brows in incredulity. Yet, as we venture forth, we invite you to join us in suspending disbelief and embracing the unexpected. After all, what is the pursuit of knowledge if not a delightful dance with the unanticipated?

So, hold onto your hypotheses and brace yourselves for a study that promises to peel back the layers of political choices and perceptions of beauty. Our findings may just prompt you to reconsider the age-old adage that "politics is skin deep," for it seems that the pursuit of liberty might be leaving its mark on more than just legislative agendas.

Intrigued? Well, buckle up, research aficionados, as we prepare to dive into a realm where politics and wrinkle reduction intersect in ways that will leave you smiling, albeit possibly with a slightly frozen expression. Let the adventure begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and perhaps even a few skeptics who raise their eyebrows at the premise of this research - welcome to a study that promises to unravel the mysteries of politics and pores. In a world where politics and personal grooming routines might seem like oil and water, we are eager to present our findings that suggest a surprising correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women.
As scholars of statistics, we often find ourselves navigating the labyrinth of data, seeking patterns and connections that may be hiding in plain sight. Little did we anticipate that our quest for numerical relationships would lead us to the realm of cosmetic enhancements. Yet, here we are, poised to examine the peculiar dance between political affiliations and the pursuit of smooth, wrinkle-free skin.
We can already hear the raised eyebrows and wrinkled foreheads of skepticism, and we embrace these reactions with a knowing grin. The intersection of political ideologies and beauty regimens may indeed seem like an unconventional alliance, but as researchers, we thrive on the unexpected and the uncharted. Our analysis promises to inject a dose of levity and curiosity into the often staid world of political science and aesthetic research.
To embark on this unconventional journey, we armed ourselves with data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. This eclectic mix of information formed the canvas on which our statistical brush would paint a picture that raises questions as well as eyebrows.
We acknowledge that the very premise of this study might prompt some to furrow their brows in incredulity. Yet, as we venture forth, we invite you to join us in suspending disbelief and embracing the unexpected. After all, what is the pursuit of knowledge if not a delightful dance with the unanticipated?
So, hold onto your hypotheses and brace yourselves for a study that promises to peel back the layers of political choices and perceptions of beauty. Our findings may just prompt you to reconsider the age-old adage that "politics is skin deep," for it seems that the pursuit of liberty might be leaving its mark on more than just legislative agendas.
Intrigued? Well, buckle up, research aficionados, as we prepare to dive into a realm where politics and wrinkle reduction intersect in ways that will leave you smiling, albeit possibly with a slightly frozen expression. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The synergistic relationship between political ideology and cosmetic enhancement practices has largely eluded scholarly attention in the past. However, recent studies have begun to shed light on the intriguing correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the ever-popular trend of Botox injections administered to women.

In "The Libertarian Mind," Smith delves into the intricate nuances of libertarian beliefs and the quest for individual autonomy. While the book focuses primarily on political philosophy, it inadvertently sparks the question: could the pursuit of personal liberty extend beyond traditional political realms and into the realm of cosmetic procedures? Quite "the poke" for thought, indeed!

Doe, in "The Economics of Beauty," undertakes a systematic exploration of societal perceptions of physical attractiveness and the economic implications of beauty standards. Unbeknownst to the author, this work paves the path for our own investigation into the intersection of political choices and the desire for aesthetic enhancement. It seems that the quest for political freedom may not be the only thing that’s "smooth" in the world of libertarianism.

Jones' "The Art of Political Strategy" artfully navigates the intricacies of political campaigns and voter behavior, offering insight into the tango between candidates and constituents. While the focus of the book is centered on strategy and tactics, it inadvertently lays the groundwork for our own exploration of the surprising connection between political affiliations and the pursuit of ageless beauty. Who knew that politics and Botox could make for such unexpected bedfellows?

Transitioning from non-fiction to fiction, we encounter "The Wrinkle in Time" by L'Engle and "The Fountainhead" by Rand. Although not dealing explicitly with botox or political voting patterns, these works offer a whimsical lens through which to ponder the unlikely intersection of political choices and the quest for eternal youth. After all, who wouldn’t want to vote for a candidate that promises a timeless, wrinkle-free society?

In the digital sphere, the infamous "Distracted Boyfriend" meme seems an apt analogy for our findings. Just as the boyfriend’s wandering eye leads to unintended consequences, it appears that political leanings and aspirations for age-defying beauty may also be casting their wandering gaze on each other. It seems that in the realm of political allegiances and cosmetic aspirations, the grass is always smoother on the other side.

These diverse sources hint at the underlying complexity of our research topic, offering both serious and lighthearted perspectives. As we forge ahead, we invite readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare for a journey that promises to blur the lines between political choices and personal grooming preferences in ways that would make even the most stoic policy wonk crack a smile.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery . You used data from 1997 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and perhaps even a few skeptics who raise their eyebrows at the premise of this research - welcome to a study that promises to unravel the mysteries of politics and pores. In a world where politics and personal grooming routines might seem like oil and water, we are eager to present our findings that suggest a surprising correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women.
As scholars of statistics, we often find ourselves navigating the labyrinth of data, seeking patterns and connections that may be hiding in plain sight. Little did we anticipate that our quest for numerical relationships would lead us to the realm of cosmetic enhancements. Yet, here we are, poised to examine the peculiar dance between political affiliations and the pursuit of smooth, wrinkle-free skin.
We can already hear the raised eyebrows and wrinkled foreheads of skepticism, and we embrace these reactions with a knowing grin. The intersection of political ideologies and beauty regimens may indeed seem like an unconventional alliance, but as researchers, we thrive on the unexpected and the uncharted. Our analysis promises to inject a dose of levity and curiosity into the often staid world of political science and aesthetic research.
To embark on this unconventional journey, we armed ourselves with data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. This eclectic mix of information formed the canvas on which our statistical brush would paint a picture that raises questions as well as eyebrows.
We acknowledge that the very premise of this study might prompt some to furrow their brows in incredulity. Yet, as we venture forth, we invite you to join us in suspending disbelief and embracing the unexpected. After all, what is the pursuit of knowledge if not a delightful dance with the unanticipated?
So, hold onto your hypotheses and brace yourselves for a study that promises to peel back the layers of political choices and perceptions of beauty. Our findings may just prompt you to reconsider the age-old adage that "politics is skin deep," for it seems that the pursuit of liberty might be leaving its mark on more than just legislative agendas.
Intrigued? Well, buckle up, research aficionados, as we prepare to dive into a realm where politics and wrinkle reduction intersect in ways that will leave you smiling, albeit possibly with a slightly frozen expression. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To navigate the uncharted territory of the confluence between political proclivities and pursuit of skin perfection, our research team dabbled in an eclectic blend of data collection and statistical analysis. Embracing an unconventional spirit, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women.

Data Collection:
In our quest for data, we scoured the digital landscape and dusted off the archives of MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Our method involved sifting through years of political election results in Texas, capturing the ever-evolving landscape of Libertarian support. Simultaneously, we amassed data on the number of Botox injections administered to women across the same temporal ambit. The fusion of quantitative political metrics and cosmetic indulgences set the stage for our numerical tango – a dance where political affiliations waltzed with wrinkle reduction endeavors.

Intertwining Variables:
With the datasets in hand, our next endeavor involved intertwining the variables with the finesse of a skilled masseuse. The Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas served as our political compass, guiding us through the ideological terrain of individual freedoms and limited government intervention. On the other hand, the number of Botox injections administered to women emerged as our window into the world of aesthetic aspirations, symbolizing the pursuit of age-defying beauty. Like an artistic blend of colors on a palette, these variables formed the canvas on which we aimed to paint a portrait of unexpected correlation.

Statistical Wizardry:
As we gazed into the depths of the data, we summoned the powers of statistical analysis to draw forth patterns and connections. Employing the venerable tool of correlation analysis, we sought to quantify the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women. Our statistical arsenal included Pearson's correlation coefficient, t-tests, and the ever-infamous p-values, which emerged as the gatekeepers of statistical significance. Through the subtle dance of mathematical formulas and regression models, we endeavored to discern whether political inclinations and aesthetic enhancements were engaged in a synchronized waltz or a chaotic tango.

Temporal Exploration:
Spanning the years from 1997 to 2019, our dataset encompassed a temporal saga of political upheavals, electoral battles, and societal shifts. By embracing this expansive timeframe, we aimed to capture the evolutionary trajectory of political ideologies and their resonance with the pursuit of youthful appearances. From the aftermath of the dot-com bubble to the era of social media ascendancy, our data meandered through a tapestry of historical events, encapsulating the nuanced interplay between political choices and the ebb and flow of cosmetic preferences.

While the unorthodox nature of our methodology may raise a few skeptical eyebrows, we embarked on this endeavor with a spirit of quirkiness and steadfast determination. The amalgamation of political dynamics and beauty aspirations may indeed seem like an unusual pairing, but as researchers, we relished in the opportunity to unravel an enigma that transcends traditional paradigms. Stay tuned as we unfurl the statistical tapestry that sheds light on the unexpected convergence of politics and Botox – a narrative that promises to leave you both pensive and, quite possibly, surprised.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery .

For the time period 1997 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.8691087, r-squared of 0.7553500, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and perhaps even a few skeptics who raise their eyebrows at the premise of this research - welcome to a study that promises to unravel the mysteries of politics and pores. In a world where politics and personal grooming routines might seem like oil and water, we are eager to present our findings that suggest a surprising correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women.
As scholars of statistics, we often find ourselves navigating the labyrinth of data, seeking patterns and connections that may be hiding in plain sight. Little did we anticipate that our quest for numerical relationships would lead us to the realm of cosmetic enhancements. Yet, here we are, poised to examine the peculiar dance between political affiliations and the pursuit of smooth, wrinkle-free skin.
We can already hear the raised eyebrows and wrinkled foreheads of skepticism, and we embrace these reactions with a knowing grin. The intersection of political ideologies and beauty regimens may indeed seem like an unconventional alliance, but as researchers, we thrive on the unexpected and the uncharted. Our analysis promises to inject a dose of levity and curiosity into the often staid world of political science and aesthetic research.
To embark on this unconventional journey, we armed ourselves with data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. This eclectic mix of information formed the canvas on which our statistical brush would paint a picture that raises questions as well as eyebrows.
We acknowledge that the very premise of this study might prompt some to furrow their brows in incredulity. Yet, as we venture forth, we invite you to join us in suspending disbelief and embracing the unexpected. After all, what is the pursuit of knowledge if not a delightful dance with the unanticipated?
So, hold onto your hypotheses and brace yourselves for a study that promises to peel back the layers of political choices and perceptions of beauty. Our findings may just prompt you to reconsider the age-old adage that "politics is skin deep," for it seems that the pursuit of liberty might be leaving its mark on more than just legislative agendas.
Intrigued? Well, buckle up, research aficionados, as we prepare to dive into a realm where politics and wrinkle reduction intersect in ways that will leave you smiling, albeit possibly with a slightly frozen expression. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our hitherto unexplored foray into the intersection of political inclination and the quest for youthful appearance, we stumbled upon a revelation that is sure to raise some eyebrows – quite literally. Our analysis of data spanning the years 1997 to 2019 has unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women. This eyebrow-raising correlation was accompanied by an r-squared of 0.7553500 and a p-value less than 0.05, signifying a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

The eye-catching statistical feat is visualized in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that depicts the conspicuous alignment of the two variables. As the number of Botox injections administered to women increases, so does the support for Libertarian candidates in Texas. One might say that the trendline of political preference appears to be as smooth as the skin purportedly achieved through extensive Botox treatment.

This unexpected correlation challenges traditional assumptions about the factors that influence political choices. While our findings do not imply causation, they undoubtedly prompt a contemplative furrowing of the brow. Could it be that the pursuit of liberty extends beyond the realm of politics and permeates the realm of personal aesthetics?

Our results illuminate a previously unexplored dimension of political behavior, hinting at a multi-faceted relationship between political ideologies and societal norms of beauty. This eyebrow-raising revelation invites further exploration into the underlying psychological, social, and cultural mechanisms driving this correlation.

The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of political science, transcending into the fields of psychology, sociology, and even dermatology. The correlation uncovered through this study urges researchers and policymakers alike to reconsider the far-reaching impact of political beliefs, inspiring them to delve deeper into the motivations that underpin seemingly superficial choices.

While the wrinkles of skepticism may knit themselves across the faces of some observers, we encourage a lighthearted interpretation of our findings, where academic pursuit meets a touch of whimsy. After all, what could be more invigorating than uncovering unexpected connections and shedding light on the unexplored recesses of human behavior?

In the spirit of scholarly curiosity and a avid pursuit of truth, we invite the academic community to join us in contemplating the nuanced relationship between political ideologies and the age-defying aspirations that might lurk beneath the surface. The voyage of inquiry knows no bounds, and our research serves as a testament to the unpredictability and delight of unearthing correlations in the most unlikely of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The synergistic relationship between political ideology and cosmetic enhancement practices has largely eluded scholarly attention in the past. However, recent studies have begun to shed light on the intriguing correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the ever-popular trend of Botox injections administered to women.
In "The Libertarian Mind," Smith delves into the intricate nuances of libertarian beliefs and the quest for individual autonomy. While the book focuses primarily on political philosophy, it inadvertently sparks the question: could the pursuit of personal liberty extend beyond traditional political realms and into the realm of cosmetic procedures? Quite "the poke" for thought, indeed!
Doe, in "The Economics of Beauty," undertakes a systematic exploration of societal perceptions of physical attractiveness and the economic implications of beauty standards. Unbeknownst to the author, this work paves the path for our own investigation into the intersection of political choices and the desire for aesthetic enhancement. It seems that the quest for political freedom may not be the only thing that’s "smooth" in the world of libertarianism.
Jones' "The Art of Political Strategy" artfully navigates the intricacies of political campaigns and voter behavior, offering insight into the tango between candidates and constituents. While the focus of the book is centered on strategy and tactics, it inadvertently lays the groundwork for our own exploration of the surprising connection between political affiliations and the pursuit of ageless beauty. Who knew that politics and Botox could make for such unexpected bedfellows?
Transitioning from non-fiction to fiction, we encounter "The Wrinkle in Time" by L'Engle and "The Fountainhead" by Rand. Although not dealing explicitly with botox or political voting patterns, these works offer a whimsical lens through which to ponder the unlikely intersection of political choices and the quest for eternal youth. After all, who wouldn’t want to vote for a candidate that promises a timeless, wrinkle-free society?
In the digital sphere, the infamous "Distracted Boyfriend" meme seems an apt analogy for our findings. Just as the boyfriend’s wandering eye leads to unintended consequences, it appears that political leanings and aspirations for age-defying beauty may also be casting their wandering gaze on each other. It seems that in the realm of political allegiances and cosmetic aspirations, the grass is always smoother on the other side.
These diverse sources hint at the underlying complexity of our research topic, offering both serious and lighthearted perspectives. As we forge ahead, we invite readers to embrace the unexpected and prepare for a journey that promises to blur the lines between political choices and personal grooming preferences in ways that would make even the most stoic policy wonk crack a smile.

[[RESULTS]]
In our hitherto unexplored foray into the intersection of political inclination and the quest for youthful appearance, we stumbled upon a revelation that is sure to raise some eyebrows – quite literally. Our analysis of data spanning the years 1997 to 2019 has unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women. This eyebrow-raising correlation was accompanied by an r-squared of 0.7553500 and a p-value less than 0.05, signifying a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The eye-catching statistical feat is visualized in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that depicts the conspicuous alignment of the two variables. As the number of Botox injections administered to women increases, so does the support for Libertarian candidates in Texas. One might say that the trendline of political preference appears to be as smooth as the skin purportedly achieved through extensive Botox treatment.
This unexpected correlation challenges traditional assumptions about the factors that influence political choices. While our findings do not imply causation, they undoubtedly prompt a contemplative furrowing of the brow. Could it be that the pursuit of liberty extends beyond the realm of politics and permeates the realm of personal aesthetics?
Our results illuminate a previously unexplored dimension of political behavior, hinting at a multi-faceted relationship between political ideologies and societal norms of beauty. This eyebrow-raising revelation invites further exploration into the underlying psychological, social, and cultural mechanisms driving this correlation.
The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of political science, transcending into the fields of psychology, sociology, and even dermatology. The correlation uncovered through this study urges researchers and policymakers alike to reconsider the far-reaching impact of political beliefs, inspiring them to delve deeper into the motivations that underpin seemingly superficial choices.
While the wrinkles of skepticism may knit themselves across the faces of some observers, we encourage a lighthearted interpretation of our findings, where academic pursuit meets a touch of whimsy. After all, what could be more invigorating than uncovering unexpected connections and shedding light on the unexplored recesses of human behavior?
In the spirit of scholarly curiosity and a avid pursuit of truth, we invite the academic community to join us in contemplating the nuanced relationship between political ideologies and the age-defying aspirations that might lurk beneath the surface. The voyage of inquiry knows no bounds, and our research serves as a testament to the unpredictability and delight of unearthing correlations in the most unlikely of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study undeniably raise a few eyebrows, to say the least. The robust correlation we discovered between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women is as surprising as stumbling upon a wrinkle in time. Our results not only substantiate the prior research that hinted at the interplay between political inclinations and the pursuit of ageless beauty but also elevate this connection to a level that demands serious consideration.

When we harken back to the lighthearted yet inadvertently prescient insight offered by Smith in "The Libertarian Mind," we find ourselves contemplating a newfound dimension of personal autonomy. The pursuit of individual freedom could indeed extend beyond the realm of policy and seep into personal lifestyle choices – in this case, quite literally, beneath the skin. Likewise, the unintentional groundwork laid by Doe in "The Economics of Beauty" takes on a newfound relevance as we observe the unexpected overlap of economic and political preferences in shaping societal norms of beauty.

Our results support the "smooth" hypothesis that the quest for political liberty is not the only "poked" consideration within the realm of libertarianism. The conspicuous alignment of our statistical findings with prior scholarly perspectives adds both weight and levity to the discourse on the multifaceted nature of ideology and personal grooming preferences.

The eye-catching correlation we observed challenges traditional assumptions about the drivers of political choices, hinting at a complexity that extends beyond conventional variables. While this eyebrow-raising finding does not establish causation, it prompts a contemplative furrowing of the brow and encourages a "deep injection" of thought into the interplay of political ideologies and aesthetic aspirations.

It is clear that our study opens an unexpected window into the psychology, sociology, and even dermatology of political behavior. As we consider the far-reaching implications of our findings, it becomes evident that the pursuit of liberty and the quest for timeless beauty may share a deeper, more interconnected relationship than previously imagined – a relationship that invites further exploration and contemplation.

In the whimsical spirit of academic pursuit, we urge the scholarly community to embrace the delightful unpredictability of unearthing correlations in the most unexpected places. Our research serves as a testament to the exhilarating dance between seemingly unrelated domains – a tango of political choices and personal grooming preferences – that demands further scholarly attention and perhaps a wrinkle-smoothing sense of humor. After all, as we embark on this quirky venture, one must not overlook the opportunity for a good laugh, or at least a smile that hasn’t been altered by Botox.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women"

[[ABSTRACT]]
With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and perhaps even a few skeptics who raise their eyebrows at the premise of this research - welcome to a study that promises to unravel the mysteries of politics and pores. In a world where politics and personal grooming routines might seem like oil and water, we are eager to present our findings that suggest a surprising correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women.
As scholars of statistics, we often find ourselves navigating the labyrinth of data, seeking patterns and connections that may be hiding in plain sight. Little did we anticipate that our quest for numerical relationships would lead us to the realm of cosmetic enhancements. Yet, here we are, poised to examine the peculiar dance between political affiliations and the pursuit of smooth, wrinkle-free skin.
We can already hear the raised eyebrows and wrinkled foreheads of skepticism, and we embrace these reactions with a knowing grin. The intersection of political ideologies and beauty regimens may indeed seem like an unconventional alliance, but as researchers, we thrive on the unexpected and the uncharted. Our analysis promises to inject a dose of levity and curiosity into the often staid world of political science and aesthetic research.
To embark on this unconventional journey, we armed ourselves with data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. This eclectic mix of information formed the canvas on which our statistical brush would paint a picture that raises questions as well as eyebrows.
We acknowledge that the very premise of this study might prompt some to furrow their brows in incredulity. Yet, as we venture forth, we invite you to join us in suspending disbelief and embracing the unexpected. After all, what is the pursuit of knowledge if not a delightful dance with the unanticipated?
So, hold onto your hypotheses and brace yourselves for a study that promises to peel back the layers of political choices and perceptions of beauty. Our findings may just prompt you to reconsider the age-old adage that "politics is skin deep," for it seems that the pursuit of liberty might be leaving its mark on more than just legislative agendas.
Intrigued? Well, buckle up, research aficionados, as we prepare to dive into a realm where politics and wrinkle reduction intersect in ways that will leave you smiling, albeit possibly with a slightly frozen expression. Let the adventure begin!

[[RESULTS]]
In our hitherto unexplored foray into the intersection of political inclination and the quest for youthful appearance, we stumbled upon a revelation that is sure to raise some eyebrows – quite literally. Our analysis of data spanning the years 1997 to 2019 has unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women. This eyebrow-raising correlation was accompanied by an r-squared of 0.7553500 and a p-value less than 0.05, signifying a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The eye-catching statistical feat is visualized in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that depicts the conspicuous alignment of the two variables. As the number of Botox injections administered to women increases, so does the support for Libertarian candidates in Texas. One might say that the trendline of political preference appears to be as smooth as the skin purportedly achieved through extensive Botox treatment.
This unexpected correlation challenges traditional assumptions about the factors that influence political choices. While our findings do not imply causation, they undoubtedly prompt a contemplative furrowing of the brow. Could it be that the pursuit of liberty extends beyond the realm of politics and permeates the realm of personal aesthetics?
Our results illuminate a previously unexplored dimension of political behavior, hinting at a multi-faceted relationship between political ideologies and societal norms of beauty. This eyebrow-raising revelation invites further exploration into the underlying psychological, social, and cultural mechanisms driving this correlation.
The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realm of political science, transcending into the fields of psychology, sociology, and even dermatology. The correlation uncovered through this study urges researchers and policymakers alike to reconsider the far-reaching impact of political beliefs, inspiring them to delve deeper into the motivations that underpin seemingly superficial choices.
While the wrinkles of skepticism may knit themselves across the faces of some observers, we encourage a lighthearted interpretation of our findings, where academic pursuit meets a touch of whimsy. After all, what could be more invigorating than uncovering unexpected connections and shedding light on the unexplored recesses of human behavior?
In the spirit of scholarly curiosity and a avid pursuit of truth, we invite the academic community to join us in contemplating the nuanced relationship between political ideologies and the age-defying aspirations that might lurk beneath the surface. The voyage of inquiry knows no bounds, and our research serves as a testament to the unpredictability and delight of unearthing correlations in the most unlikely of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our unorthodox exploration into the correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in Texas and the number of Botox injections administered to women has left us not only with statistically significant findings but also with a few raised eyebrows, perhaps due to unexpected wrinkle-reducing insights. This eyebrow-raising correlation challenges conventional assumptions and beckons a closer look at the multifaceted nature of political preferences and personal choices. While some may furrow their brows in skepticism, we urge a light-hearted interpretation of our findings, embracing the whimsical dance between seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Our study not only sheds light on the interplay between political ideologies and societal beauty norms but also serves as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of research. As we untangle the curious connection between political inclinations and the pursuit of ageless aesthetics, we invite the academic community to join us in our contemplation of the nuances that underpin seemingly superficial choices. After all, the pursuit of knowledge often unfolds with a touch of the unexpected and a dash of levity.

In the spirit of academic curiosity and a fervent quest for truth, we assert that our findings provide a whimsical yet thought-provoking addition to the scholarly discourse. We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to ponder the lingering question: does a vote for liberty also denote a desire for a smoother visage? As we bid adieu to this quirky venture, we assert with utmost levity but absolute conviction that no more research is needed in this delightful, albeit slightly bemusing, realm of inquiry. Cheers to democracy, dermal enhancements, and the whimsical world of statistical surprises!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Dermatology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Dermatological Political Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Politics of Wrinkle Reduction: Examining the Correlation Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in Texas and Botox Injections Administered to Women with an abstract of With the rise of libertarianism and the pursuit of individual freedoms, our research delves into the unexpected realm of cosmetic enhancements to explore the relationship between political inclinations and the quest for eternal youth. Leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, we engaged in a statistical feat that would make even the most seasoned number-cruncher raise an eyebrow. Our analysis revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8691087 and p < 0.05 during the years spanning 1997 to 2019. Join us as we unveil the quirks and creases of this connection, paving the way for a political discourse that transcends the surface and truly gets under the skin of ideology and beauty standards. Prepare to be injected with insights unlike any other, as we tackle the pressing question: does a vote for liberty also correlate with a bid for a wrinkle-free visage?

ChatGPT:

libertarian votes, senators, Texas, Botox injections, women, cosmetic enhancements, political inclinations, eternal youth, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, ideology, beauty standards, political discourse, liberty, wrinkle-free visage

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Texas
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Texas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Texas

Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women
Source: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
See what else correlates with Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women

Correlation r = 0.8691087 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7553500 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Texas) over the 7 years from 1997 through 2019.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0111. 0.0110809634005944670000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 1.11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 90 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.34, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200220062008201220142018
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Texas (Percentage of votes)1.159180.7872822.263722.341242.064312.877380.782044
Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women (Injections)971000142400028810002239000291600031740001638000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.15918,0.787282,2.26372,2.34124,2.06431,2.87738,0.782044,])
array_2 = np.array([971000,1424000,2881000,2239000,2916000,3174000,1638000,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Texas"
array_2_name = "Number of Botox Injections Administered to Women"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4393 · Black Variable ID: 26466 · Red Variable ID: 9
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0