about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,522 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and the second variable is Number of websites on the internet.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the support for the Libertarian candidate surged in Kansas, so did the desire for online freedom, leading to a wave of new internet creators. It seems like in this case, when it comes to internet expansion, it's all about the pursuit of happiness - and website development!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image representing Kansas with a surge of excitement and freedom as people actively engage in voting for the Libertarian Presidential candidate and creating websites to symbolize online freedom. The scene should capture the sense of energy and activity as individuals participate in both activities, reflecting the increasing support for the candidate and the wave of new internet creators. The image should have a vibrant and dynamic feel, conveying the enthusiasm and freedom associated with the events taking place. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Cutsy art illustration Macabre Data cyber art Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet, in the following situation: As the support for the Libertarian candidate surged in Kansas, so did the desire for online freedom, leading to a wave of new internet creators. It seems like in this case, when it comes to internet expansion, it's all about the pursuit of happiness - and website development!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Kansas, a surge of support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate is reflected in the increasing number of ballots being cast. Concurrently, the desire for online freedom is evident as numerous individuals are seen creating websites, symbolizing the wave of new internet creators. The scene portrays a sense of excitement and freedom, with people actively engaging in both voting and expanding online presence.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In Kansas, a surge of support for the Libertarian Presidential candidate is reflected in the increasing number of ballots being cast. Concurrently, the desire for online freedom is evident as numerous individuals are seen creating websites, symbolizing the wave of new internet creators. The scene portrays a sense of excitement and freedom, with people actively engaging in both voting and expanding online presence. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image representing Kansas with a surge of excitement and freedom as people actively engage in voting for the Libertarian Presidential candidate and creating websites to symbolize online freedom. The scene should capture the sense of energy and activity as individuals participate in both activities, reflecting the increasing support for the candidate and the wave of new internet creators. The image should have a vibrant and dynamic feel, conveying the enthusiasm and freedom associated with the events taking place.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas caused Number of websites on the internet to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet

Journal of Eclectic Electoral Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9473033 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the vast expanse of the world wide web, where cat videos and endless debates about pineapple on pizza reside, lies a curiosity that has long escaped the notice of the digital gaze - the peculiar link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas and the number of websites on the internet. This study aims to scrutinize this unlikely relationship and cast light on the uncharted territories of cyber-politics. By delving into the complex intertwining of politics and cyberspace, this research seeks to uncover the hidden connections akin to a digital Sherlock Holmes, revealing correlations that are as unexpected as finding a vegan at a carnivore's convention.

The unlikely dance between web domains and political leanings has initiated an investigation that will make even the most stoic of statisticians raise an eyebrow. The correlation uncovered between these seemingly disparate variables suggests that there may be more to cyberspace than meets the unaided eye. It is almost as if the world wide web and political ambitions have conspired in a digital tango, performing a synchronous ballet that is as enigmatic as a cryptic crossword puzzle.

As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, we ponder whether websites, akin to curious cosmic particles, are influenced by the gravitational pull of political events or if political undercurrents are influenced by the ebb and flow of digital landscapes. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the threads of causality intertwined within this fascinating narrative, shedding light on this esoteric interplay between political phenomena and technological evolution.

The significance of this correlation, nearly as intriguing as the mystery behind unexpected statistical outliers, beckons for exploration and interpretation, challenging conventional wisdom and tickling the fancies of even the most sober-minded in the scholarly community. Just as Schrödinger's cat piques our interest in quantum superpositions, this correlation tantalizingly beckons us to peer beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena and discern the mysterious and delightful connections that await our scholarly scrutiny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast expanse of the world wide web, where cat videos and endless debates about pineapple on pizza reside, lies a curiosity that has long escaped the notice of the digital gaze - the peculiar link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas and the number of websites on the internet. This study aims to scrutinize this unlikely relationship and cast light on the uncharted territories of cyber-politics. By delving into the complex intertwining of politics and cyberspace, this research seeks to uncover the hidden connections akin to a digital Sherlock Holmes, revealing correlations that are as unexpected as finding a vegan at a carnivore's convention.
The unlikely dance between web domains and political leanings has initiated an investigation that will make even the most stoic of statisticians raise an eyebrow. The correlation uncovered between these seemingly disparate variables suggests that there may be more to cyberspace than meets the unaided eye. It is almost as if the world wide web and political ambitions have conspired in a digital tango, performing a synchronous ballet that is as enigmatic as a cryptic crossword puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, we ponder whether websites, akin to curious cosmic particles, are influenced by the gravitational pull of political events or if political undercurrents are influenced by the ebb and flow of digital landscapes. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the threads of causality intertwined within this fascinating narrative, shedding light on this esoteric interplay between political phenomena and technological evolution.
The significance of this correlation, nearly as intriguing as the mystery behind unexpected statistical outliers, beckons for exploration and interpretation, challenging conventional wisdom and tickling the fancies of even the most sober-minded in the scholarly community. Just as Schrödinger's cat piques our interest in quantum superpositions, this correlation tantalizingly beckons us to peer beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena and discern the mysterious and delightful connections that await our scholarly scrutiny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) explore the correlation between political voting patterns and internet usage, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics that intertwine cyberspace and civic engagement. Their findings illuminate a potentially robust association, foreshadowing the web of discovery that awaits those who delve into the convergence of digital domains and political predilections.

Delving further into this curious connection, Jones (2018) investigates the impact of internet accessibility on political participation, offering insights into the potential influence of online platforms on electoral behaviors. Their work lays the groundwork for understanding the enigmatic relationship between cyber presence and political choices, paving the way for further exploration of the interplay between electronic landscapes and democratic decisions.

Expanding the scope of research beyond conventional academic studies, "The Fourth Revolution" by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge (2014) delves into the transformative power of digital innovation and its repercussions on traditional political structures. While not specifically focused on the intersection of internet prevalence and libertarian voting trends, the book provides a compelling backdrop for contextualizing the evolving role of digital technologies in shaping political landscapes.

In a speculative turn, the fictional novel "Neuromancer" by William Gibson (1984) offers a dystopian portrayal of a digitally intertwined society, inviting contemplation on the potential ramifications of a hyperconnected world on political ideologies and voting behaviors. While the narrative is fictional, its thematic exploration of the fusion between virtual realms and societal dynamics presents a captivating lens through which to contemplate the unexpected interplay between online expanses and political inclinations.

Additionally, an array of social media posts prompted ponderings on the relationship between the proliferation of websites and political affiliations, with users sharing anecdotes and musings that hinted at the potential entanglement between digital domains and electoral fervor. While not scholarly sources by conventional standards, the organic conversations and anecdotal reflections on platforms such as Twitter and Reddit revealed a palpable undercurrent of curiosity regarding the interwoven nature of online spaces and political allegiances.

As the scholarly discourse intertwines with speculative musings and anecdotal insights, a whimsical symphony of academic inquiry and digital enchantment converges, beckoning us to sift through the labyrinths of data and contemplation, in pursuit of unraveling the enthralling correlation between the libertarian vote in Kansas and the flourishing expanse of the world wide web.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats . You used data from 1991 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast expanse of the world wide web, where cat videos and endless debates about pineapple on pizza reside, lies a curiosity that has long escaped the notice of the digital gaze - the peculiar link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas and the number of websites on the internet. This study aims to scrutinize this unlikely relationship and cast light on the uncharted territories of cyber-politics. By delving into the complex intertwining of politics and cyberspace, this research seeks to uncover the hidden connections akin to a digital Sherlock Holmes, revealing correlations that are as unexpected as finding a vegan at a carnivore's convention.
The unlikely dance between web domains and political leanings has initiated an investigation that will make even the most stoic of statisticians raise an eyebrow. The correlation uncovered between these seemingly disparate variables suggests that there may be more to cyberspace than meets the unaided eye. It is almost as if the world wide web and political ambitions have conspired in a digital tango, performing a synchronous ballet that is as enigmatic as a cryptic crossword puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, we ponder whether websites, akin to curious cosmic particles, are influenced by the gravitational pull of political events or if political undercurrents are influenced by the ebb and flow of digital landscapes. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the threads of causality intertwined within this fascinating narrative, shedding light on this esoteric interplay between political phenomena and technological evolution.
The significance of this correlation, nearly as intriguing as the mystery behind unexpected statistical outliers, beckons for exploration and interpretation, challenging conventional wisdom and tickling the fancies of even the most sober-minded in the scholarly community. Just as Schrödinger's cat piques our interest in quantum superpositions, this correlation tantalizingly beckons us to peer beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena and discern the mysterious and delightful connections that await our scholarly scrutiny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas, we employed a methodological approach that was as meticulously curated as a collector poring over rare stamps. Our primary sources of data were the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, which served as our trusty Sherpas guiding us through the treacherous terrain of statistical landscapes.

Our data collection spanned the years 1991 to 2018, encompassing a period as eventful and fluctuating as a yo-yo competition. At the outset, we meticulously gathered the number of websites from the Internet Live Stats, a virtual almanac of cyber-domain proliferation that provided us with a comprehensive snapshot of the ever-expanding internet. We then harmoniously combined this information with the votes garnered by the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas, as documented by the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and Harvard Dataverse, forming a statistical ensemble as harmonious as a symphony orchestra conducted by a mathematical maestro.

Statistical analysis, akin to a riddle wrapped in an enigma, was carried out to unveil the degree of association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient, resembling a digital Sherlock Holmes on the search for hidden patterns, was employed to measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian candidate. This was complemented by a meticulous inspection of the p-value, which served as the gatekeeper to discern the statistical significance of our findings, akin to a discerning bouncer at a mathematical club.

Furthermore, we utilized advanced statistical software, as sophisticated as a quantum computer, to perform additional analyses, including regression modeling and sensitivity analyses, to ensure the robustness and reliability of our exploratory investigations. These analyses were as thorough and exhaustive as a marathon runner's strides, propelling us forward in our quest for empirical elucidation.

In conclusion, our methodological approach encapsulated a harmonious blend of statistical rigor, theoretical acumen, and digital dexterity, akin to a well-choreographed ballet performance on the stage of academic inquiry, to unravel the intertwined mysteries of cyberspace and political allegiance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats .

For the time period 1991 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9473033, r-squared of 0.8973836, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast expanse of the world wide web, where cat videos and endless debates about pineapple on pizza reside, lies a curiosity that has long escaped the notice of the digital gaze - the peculiar link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas and the number of websites on the internet. This study aims to scrutinize this unlikely relationship and cast light on the uncharted territories of cyber-politics. By delving into the complex intertwining of politics and cyberspace, this research seeks to uncover the hidden connections akin to a digital Sherlock Holmes, revealing correlations that are as unexpected as finding a vegan at a carnivore's convention.
The unlikely dance between web domains and political leanings has initiated an investigation that will make even the most stoic of statisticians raise an eyebrow. The correlation uncovered between these seemingly disparate variables suggests that there may be more to cyberspace than meets the unaided eye. It is almost as if the world wide web and political ambitions have conspired in a digital tango, performing a synchronous ballet that is as enigmatic as a cryptic crossword puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, we ponder whether websites, akin to curious cosmic particles, are influenced by the gravitational pull of political events or if political undercurrents are influenced by the ebb and flow of digital landscapes. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the threads of causality intertwined within this fascinating narrative, shedding light on this esoteric interplay between political phenomena and technological evolution.
The significance of this correlation, nearly as intriguing as the mystery behind unexpected statistical outliers, beckons for exploration and interpretation, challenging conventional wisdom and tickling the fancies of even the most sober-minded in the scholarly community. Just as Schrödinger's cat piques our interest in quantum superpositions, this correlation tantalizingly beckons us to peer beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena and discern the mysterious and delightful connections that await our scholarly scrutiny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas for the years 1991 to 2018 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9473033. This coefficient, akin to an unsuspecting protagonist stumbling upon a hidden treasure, elucidates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8973836 further accentuates the robustness of this unusual connection, resembling the assurance of finding one's missing sock after a thorough search.

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to discovreing a diamond in the rough. This unexpected and noteworthy finding quirkily suggests a concurrence between the growth in digital real estate and the proclivity for voting Libertarian in the state of Kansas, evoking a sense of wonder similar to stumbling upon a rare and wondrous artifact in a digital archeological dig.

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly captures the remarkably strong relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas. The plot, akin to a visually engaging treasure map, portrays the alignment of data points, affirming the unfathomable yet intriguing bond that exists between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation, analogous to stumbling upon an unexpected harmony in a cacophony, incites curiosity and warrants further investigation to decipher the underlying causative mechanisms.

The uncanny and unexpected nature of this correlation beckons for a deeper understanding, tempting the scholarly community to delve into this intriguing phenomenon that is as surprising as finding a vegan at a barbecue festival. The implications of this correlation, with its enigmatic allure, prompt reflections and inquiries into the intricate intertwining of digital landscapes and political preferences. Further exploration is warranted to disentangle the nuances of this curious association and illuminate the hidden dynamics at play.

This perplexing relationship stands as a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of the digital and political realms, calling for continued exploration and scholarly scrutiny. Just as a cryptic crossword puzzle captivates the mind with its mysterious connections, this correlation captivates the scholarly imagination, propelling us to uncover and decipher the compelling narrative woven between the internet and political tendencies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) explore the correlation between political voting patterns and internet usage, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics that intertwine cyberspace and civic engagement. Their findings illuminate a potentially robust association, foreshadowing the web of discovery that awaits those who delve into the convergence of digital domains and political predilections.
Delving further into this curious connection, Jones (2018) investigates the impact of internet accessibility on political participation, offering insights into the potential influence of online platforms on electoral behaviors. Their work lays the groundwork for understanding the enigmatic relationship between cyber presence and political choices, paving the way for further exploration of the interplay between electronic landscapes and democratic decisions.
Expanding the scope of research beyond conventional academic studies, "The Fourth Revolution" by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge (2014) delves into the transformative power of digital innovation and its repercussions on traditional political structures. While not specifically focused on the intersection of internet prevalence and libertarian voting trends, the book provides a compelling backdrop for contextualizing the evolving role of digital technologies in shaping political landscapes.
In a speculative turn, the fictional novel "Neuromancer" by William Gibson (1984) offers a dystopian portrayal of a digitally intertwined society, inviting contemplation on the potential ramifications of a hyperconnected world on political ideologies and voting behaviors. While the narrative is fictional, its thematic exploration of the fusion between virtual realms and societal dynamics presents a captivating lens through which to contemplate the unexpected interplay between online expanses and political inclinations.
Additionally, an array of social media posts prompted ponderings on the relationship between the proliferation of websites and political affiliations, with users sharing anecdotes and musings that hinted at the potential entanglement between digital domains and electoral fervor. While not scholarly sources by conventional standards, the organic conversations and anecdotal reflections on platforms such as Twitter and Reddit revealed a palpable undercurrent of curiosity regarding the interwoven nature of online spaces and political allegiances.
As the scholarly discourse intertwines with speculative musings and anecdotal insights, a whimsical symphony of academic inquiry and digital enchantment converges, beckoning us to sift through the labyrinths of data and contemplation, in pursuit of unraveling the enthralling correlation between the libertarian vote in Kansas and the flourishing expanse of the world wide web.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas for the years 1991 to 2018 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9473033. This coefficient, akin to an unsuspecting protagonist stumbling upon a hidden treasure, elucidates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8973836 further accentuates the robustness of this unusual connection, resembling the assurance of finding one's missing sock after a thorough search.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to discovreing a diamond in the rough. This unexpected and noteworthy finding quirkily suggests a concurrence between the growth in digital real estate and the proclivity for voting Libertarian in the state of Kansas, evoking a sense of wonder similar to stumbling upon a rare and wondrous artifact in a digital archeological dig.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly captures the remarkably strong relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas. The plot, akin to a visually engaging treasure map, portrays the alignment of data points, affirming the unfathomable yet intriguing bond that exists between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation, analogous to stumbling upon an unexpected harmony in a cacophony, incites curiosity and warrants further investigation to decipher the underlying causative mechanisms.
The uncanny and unexpected nature of this correlation beckons for a deeper understanding, tempting the scholarly community to delve into this intriguing phenomenon that is as surprising as finding a vegan at a barbecue festival. The implications of this correlation, with its enigmatic allure, prompt reflections and inquiries into the intricate intertwining of digital landscapes and political preferences. Further exploration is warranted to disentangle the nuances of this curious association and illuminate the hidden dynamics at play.
This perplexing relationship stands as a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of the digital and political realms, calling for continued exploration and scholarly scrutiny. Just as a cryptic crossword puzzle captivates the mind with its mysterious connections, this correlation captivates the scholarly imagination, propelling us to uncover and decipher the compelling narrative woven between the internet and political tendencies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected and remarkably strong correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas elucidates a captivating narrative that beckons the scholarly community to untangle its enigmatic threads. This curious confluence of digital expanse and political preferences is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure trove in the vast landscape of statistical analysis, captivating the mind and evoking a sense of wonder akin to a scientific discovery wrapped in an anachronistic riddle.

Supporting prior research by Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones (2018), our findings align with the foreshadowed potential for a robust association between internet presence and political decisions. The robust correlation coefficient acts as a linchpin, connecting the dots between cyber domains and civic engagement, akin to a scientific tryst between unexpected bedfellows.

In a whimsically orchestrated convergence of scholarly discourse and speculative musings, our results add a palatable dimension to the speculative anecdotes and organic conversations on social media platforms, reminiscent of an intellectual tapestry interwoven with digital enchantment. This correlation, akin to discovering a meticulously hidden pun in a mundane statistical dataset, prompts contemplation on the interplay between online expanses and political predilections, invoking a sense of curiosity as compelling as a thrilling enigma wrapped in a cloak of statistical certainty.

While the unexpected and unlikely nature of this correlation engages the scholarly imagination in a manner akin to unraveling the intricate plot of a scientific mystery, the implications of this finding beckon for continued exploration. Just as a cleverly constructed pun elicits laughter amidst serious discourse, this correlation invites further investigation and scholarly scrutiny, propelling us to decode the whimsical narrative woven between the internet and political tendencies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast expanse of the world wide web, where cat videos and endless debates about pineapple on pizza reside, lies a curiosity that has long escaped the notice of the digital gaze - the peculiar link between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas and the number of websites on the internet. This study aims to scrutinize this unlikely relationship and cast light on the uncharted territories of cyber-politics. By delving into the complex intertwining of politics and cyberspace, this research seeks to uncover the hidden connections akin to a digital Sherlock Holmes, revealing correlations that are as unexpected as finding a vegan at a carnivore's convention.
The unlikely dance between web domains and political leanings has initiated an investigation that will make even the most stoic of statisticians raise an eyebrow. The correlation uncovered between these seemingly disparate variables suggests that there may be more to cyberspace than meets the unaided eye. It is almost as if the world wide web and political ambitions have conspired in a digital tango, performing a synchronous ballet that is as enigmatic as a cryptic crossword puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly jaunt, we ponder whether websites, akin to curious cosmic particles, are influenced by the gravitational pull of political events or if political undercurrents are influenced by the ebb and flow of digital landscapes. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the threads of causality intertwined within this fascinating narrative, shedding light on this esoteric interplay between political phenomena and technological evolution.
The significance of this correlation, nearly as intriguing as the mystery behind unexpected statistical outliers, beckons for exploration and interpretation, challenging conventional wisdom and tickling the fancies of even the most sober-minded in the scholarly community. Just as Schrödinger's cat piques our interest in quantum superpositions, this correlation tantalizingly beckons us to peer beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena and discern the mysterious and delightful connections that await our scholarly scrutiny.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas for the years 1991 to 2018 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9473033. This coefficient, akin to an unsuspecting protagonist stumbling upon a hidden treasure, elucidates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. The r-squared value of 0.8973836 further accentuates the robustness of this unusual connection, resembling the assurance of finding one's missing sock after a thorough search.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this correlation, akin to discovreing a diamond in the rough. This unexpected and noteworthy finding quirkily suggests a concurrence between the growth in digital real estate and the proclivity for voting Libertarian in the state of Kansas, evoking a sense of wonder similar to stumbling upon a rare and wondrous artifact in a digital archeological dig.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly captures the remarkably strong relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas. The plot, akin to a visually engaging treasure map, portrays the alignment of data points, affirming the unfathomable yet intriguing bond that exists between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation, analogous to stumbling upon an unexpected harmony in a cacophony, incites curiosity and warrants further investigation to decipher the underlying causative mechanisms.
The uncanny and unexpected nature of this correlation beckons for a deeper understanding, tempting the scholarly community to delve into this intriguing phenomenon that is as surprising as finding a vegan at a barbecue festival. The implications of this correlation, with its enigmatic allure, prompt reflections and inquiries into the intricate intertwining of digital landscapes and political preferences. Further exploration is warranted to disentangle the nuances of this curious association and illuminate the hidden dynamics at play.
This perplexing relationship stands as a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of the digital and political realms, calling for continued exploration and scholarly scrutiny. Just as a cryptic crossword puzzle captivates the mind with its mysterious connections, this correlation captivates the scholarly imagination, propelling us to uncover and decipher the compelling narrative woven between the internet and political tendencies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the curious correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Kansas and the number of websites on the internet has uncovered a statistically robust and remarkably strong association. The correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected mathematical marvel in the cybernetic cosmos, reveals a compelling positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the significance of this unconventional correlation, not unlike discovering a rare gemstone in the statistical rough.

As this unlikely digital waltz between cyberspace and political inclinations continues to enthrall us, it prompts a deeper exploration into the clandestine connections that underlie this enigmatic relationship. The implications of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a surprising plot twist in a scholarly mystery novel, challenge us to unravel the underlying mechanisms and discern the peculiar interplay between the evolution of digital domains and political predilections.

The unexpected and thought-provoking nature of this correlation whimsically beckons us to ponder whether cyberspace and political aspirations engage in a harmonious duet, akin to a riddle waiting to be solved in a scholarly treasure hunt. However, our findings assert that no further research in this area is needed, leaving us with the feeling of closing the final chapter of a captivating whodunit, content in the knowledge that this curious correlation stands as a testament to the whimsical mysteries that enliven the world of statistics and research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Eclectic Electoral Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Political Analysis and Research (SQPAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Vote Libertarian, Surfin' the Web: A Correlation Study Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Kansas and the Number of Websites on the Internet with an abstract of This research paper investigates the curious relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in the state of Kansas. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 1991 to 2018. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9473033, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. This unique correlation prompts further investigation and analysis to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this improbable yet intriguing phenomenon.

ChatGPT:

Vote Libertarian, Libertarian presidential candidate, Kansas, internet websites, correlation study, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Internet Live Stats, 1991-2018, correlation coefficient, p-value, association, analysis, factors, phenomenon

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas

Number of websites on the internet
Detailed data title: Number of websites, measured by unique hostnames
Source: Internet Live Stats
See what else correlates with Number of websites on the internet

Correlation r = 0.9473033 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8973836 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of websites on the internet) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas) over the 7 years from 1991 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0012. 0.0011899802712347110000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 840 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992199620002004200820122016
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas (Percentage of votes)0.3727850.4241830.4220230.3378640.5426131.763494.67797
Number of websites on the internet (Websites)1025760117087200516116001723390006970890001045530000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.372785,0.424183,0.422023,0.337864,0.542613,1.76349,4.67797,])
array_2 = np.array([10,257601,17087200,51611600,172339000,697089000,1045530000,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Number of websites on the internet"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4522 · Black Variable ID: 26098 · Red Variable ID: 370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0