about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,880 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Kansas and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Kansans showed their support for the Democratic candidate, the heightened political fervor somehow translated into a surge of demand for BMW cars, leading the manufacturer to issue more recalls to keep up with the unexpected interest from traditionally non-BMW territory. Looks like the Sunflower State's political climate isn't the only thing revving up BMW's operations!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Create an image of a parking lot in Kansas, where a line of people excitedly waits to cast their votes for the Democratic presidential candidate. At the same time, a line of sleek BMW cars is positioned alongside them, awaiting recall repairs due to an unexpected surge in demand from the politically charged state. Capture the unique intersection of political fervor and automotive buzz in the heartland, with the people and cars creating an unusual scene." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism A scene from Skyrim Surrealism Cutsy art illustration Charcoal
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America, in the following situation: As more Kansans showed their support for the Democratic candidate, the heightened political fervor somehow translated into a surge of demand for BMW cars, leading the manufacturer to issue more recalls to keep up with the unexpected interest from traditionally non-BMW territory. Looks like the Sunflower State's political climate isn't the only thing revving up BMW's operations!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a parking lot in Kansas, a line of people forms, eagerly waiting to cast their votes for the Democratic presidential candidate. Alongside them, a line of sleek BMW cars awaits recall repairs, as the unexpected surge in demand from the politically charged state has led to more issues needing attention. The political fervor and automotive buzz create an unusual scene in the heartland.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a parking lot in Kansas, a line of people forms, eagerly waiting to cast their votes for the Democratic presidential candidate. Alongside them, a line of sleek BMW cars awaits recall repairs, as the unexpected surge in demand from the politically charged state has led to more issues needing attention. The political fervor and automotive buzz create an unusual scene in the heartland. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Create an image of a parking lot in Kansas, where a line of people excitedly waits to cast their votes for the Democratic presidential candidate. At the same time, a line of sleek BMW cars is positioned alongside them, awaiting recall repairs due to an unexpected surge in demand from the politically charged state. Capture the unique intersection of political fervor and automotive buzz in the heartland, with the people and cars creating an unusual scene."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas caused Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Statistical Oddities and Curiosities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to politics and automotive recalls, one might think that the only correlation between the two lies in the tireless spin of campaign wheels. However, our research aims to unveil a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence and delves into uncharted territory. In this study, we aim to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the political leaning of Kansans and the automotive headaches faced by BMW of North America.

Ah, the exciting world of statistics and political science – where hypotheses collide, data dance, and correlation coefficients have been known to cause a stir! As we embark on this research venture, we cannot help but ponder: "Why did the statistician break up with the political scientist? They couldn't find a common ground!"

Combining the robust data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team navigated through a maze of numbers and trends in pursuit of uncovering the mysterious link between Democrat presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls. As we waded through the sea of electoral data and automobile mishaps, our mission was clear: to uncover the driving force behind this unlikely correlation and to draw attention to the potentially underexplored dynamics at play.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a p-value that tantalizingly flirts with statistical significance, our findings rev up a whirlwind of excitement and curiosity. It seems that these two variables are more intertwined than a stubborn lug nut on a rusty tire! After all, as we academics like to say, "Always trust a statistician, especially when they have a good 'car-ma'!"

Through our tireless dedication to unraveling this peculiar connection, we hope to add a dash of humor and intellectual curiosity to the discourse. As the engine of our research roars to life, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly joyride and explore the unexpected twists and turns that arise when blending politics, automotive industry events, and a sprinkle of statistical magic. After all, what's the point of research without a liberal dose of wit and whimsy?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to politics and automotive recalls, one might think that the only correlation between the two lies in the tireless spin of campaign wheels. However, our research aims to unveil a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence and delves into uncharted territory. In this study, we aim to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the political leaning of Kansans and the automotive headaches faced by BMW of North America.
Ah, the exciting world of statistics and political science – where hypotheses collide, data dance, and correlation coefficients have been known to cause a stir! As we embark on this research venture, we cannot help but ponder: "Why did the statistician break up with the political scientist? They couldn't find a common ground!"
Combining the robust data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team navigated through a maze of numbers and trends in pursuit of uncovering the mysterious link between Democrat presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls. As we waded through the sea of electoral data and automobile mishaps, our mission was clear: to uncover the driving force behind this unlikely correlation and to draw attention to the potentially underexplored dynamics at play.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a p-value that tantalizingly flirts with statistical significance, our findings rev up a whirlwind of excitement and curiosity. It seems that these two variables are more intertwined than a stubborn lug nut on a rusty tire! After all, as we academics like to say, "Always trust a statistician, especially when they have a good 'car-ma'!"
Through our tireless dedication to unraveling this peculiar connection, we hope to add a dash of humor and intellectual curiosity to the discourse. As the engine of our research roars to life, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly joyride and explore the unexpected twists and turns that arise when blending politics, automotive industry events, and a sprinkle of statistical magic. After all, what's the point of research without a liberal dose of wit and whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To lay the foundation for our exploration into the intriguing correlation between the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America, we turn to the insightful works of Smith, Doe, and Jones. In "Political Leanings in the American Heartland," Smith astutely analyzes the voting patterns in Kansas, shedding light on the complex dynamics at play. Meanwhile, Doe's "The Automotive Industry and Recalls: A Comprehensive Analysis" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to automotive recalls, setting the stage for our investigation. Last but not least, Jones' "Quantitative Methods in Political Science and Automotive Engineering" offers a meticulous examination of statistical techniques that are pertinent to our study.

Now, veering off the well-trodden path and into the realm of unconventional inspiration, we cannot overlook the wisdom imparted by non-fiction literary works. "The Art of Persuasion: Political Campaigns and Automotive Engineering" by Richard Powers and "Recalls and Repercussions: A Saga of Automotive Troubles" by Amanda Quick offer thought-provoking perspectives that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.

In the spirit of unexpected connections, let's not discount the potential insights that can be gleaned from fictional literature. Could there be a parallel universe where the characters of "The Great Gatsby" drive BMWs and passionately debate political ideologies? Or perhaps a dystopian world in which "1984" intersects with automotive mishaps in a manner that defies conventional logic?

Turning our attention to the small screen, it's worth noting the subtle but undeniable presence of our research topic in popular culture. For instance, the animated series "Cars" presents a whimsical yet surprisingly relatable portrayal of automotive experiences, with a potential for uncovering profound revelations. And let's not forget the educational potential inherent in children's shows such as "Paw Patrol," where the intersection of civic duty and mechanical malfunctions offers an unexpected yet insightful perspective.

In the illustrious words of pioneering researcher Dr. Seuss, "You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself in any direction you choose." With this eclectic blend of scholarly sources and whimsical inspiration, we are poised to traverse the uncharted terrain where politics, automotive industry events, and statistical prowess collide.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to politics and automotive recalls, one might think that the only correlation between the two lies in the tireless spin of campaign wheels. However, our research aims to unveil a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence and delves into uncharted territory. In this study, we aim to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the political leaning of Kansans and the automotive headaches faced by BMW of North America.
Ah, the exciting world of statistics and political science – where hypotheses collide, data dance, and correlation coefficients have been known to cause a stir! As we embark on this research venture, we cannot help but ponder: "Why did the statistician break up with the political scientist? They couldn't find a common ground!"
Combining the robust data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team navigated through a maze of numbers and trends in pursuit of uncovering the mysterious link between Democrat presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls. As we waded through the sea of electoral data and automobile mishaps, our mission was clear: to uncover the driving force behind this unlikely correlation and to draw attention to the potentially underexplored dynamics at play.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a p-value that tantalizingly flirts with statistical significance, our findings rev up a whirlwind of excitement and curiosity. It seems that these two variables are more intertwined than a stubborn lug nut on a rusty tire! After all, as we academics like to say, "Always trust a statistician, especially when they have a good 'car-ma'!"
Through our tireless dedication to unraveling this peculiar connection, we hope to add a dash of humor and intellectual curiosity to the discourse. As the engine of our research roars to life, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly joyride and explore the unexpected twists and turns that arise when blending politics, automotive industry events, and a sprinkle of statistical magic. After all, what's the point of research without a liberal dose of wit and whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigma of the correlation between Democrat Presidential votes in Kansas and the issuance of automotive recalls by BMW of North America, our research team employed a hodgepodge of data wrangling techniques and statistical shenanigans. First, we scoured the vast plains of the internet, harvesting pertinent electoral information from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab as well as the Harvard Dataverse. We then revved up our search engines and gleefully collected automotive recall data from the US DOT, ensuring our databases were more packed than a clown car at a circus. After all, when it comes to research, the more, the merrier!

Once armed with an extensive collection of electoral and automotive recall data spanning the years 1976 to 2020, we unleashed the power of statistical tools that would make a mad scientist proud. Utilizing an arsenal of regression analyses, correlation tests, and demographic breakdowns, we set out to reveal the hidden harmonies in the seemingly dissonant duet of political votes and automotive setbacks.

In examining the Democrat Presidential votes as the independent variable and the BMW automotive recalls as the dependent variable, we aimed to untangle the interconnected web of variables with the precision of a seasoned seamstress. Our statistical quest hinged upon exploring various models and methodologies to tease out the nuances and patterns lurking within the data, all while staying as impartial as a Swiss-made chronometer.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a multitude of data points at our fingertips, we danced through the realms of hypothesis testing and regression diagnostics, unearthing insights that were more surprising than finding a convertible in a blizzard. As the statistical dust settled and the numbers relinquished their secrets, it became clear that the correlation between Democrat Presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls was as pronounced as the clang of a wrench in a quiet garage.

In addition to our statistical exploits, we also indulged in some qualitative analyses to complement our quantitative forays. We pored over historical events, political dynamics, and automotive industry news to enrich our understanding of the contextual underpinnings that could fuel this unexpected relationship. After all, sometimes the narrative behind the numbers can be as gripping as a suspense novel, and we didn't want to miss out on any juicy plot twists.

Our methodologies may seem like a peculiar blend of mathematical wizardry and narrative sleuthing, but rest assured, they were concocted with the utmost care and scientific rigor. It's not every day that one unravels the intertwined yarn of political aspirations and automotive tribulations, and we were determined to approach this research endeavor with the perfect blend of curiosity and statistical flair. As they say, "Research without a touch of whimsy is like a day without sunshine – statistically improbable!"

Through this multifaceted approach, we endeavored to capture the essence of the unlikely connection between Democrat Presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls, leaving no statistical stone unturned and no witty pun unspoken. With our data in hand and our statistical tools polished to a gleam, we set out to prove that, indeed, where there's smoke, there might just be a correlation waiting to be uncovered - and we were ready to bring the statistical fire extinguisher!

What do data scientists use to survey the automotive landscape? A "recal-culator"! And with that, we were off on a data-driven odyssey, armed with our findings and a hearty dose of dry humor.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8442238, r-squared of 0.7127138, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to politics and automotive recalls, one might think that the only correlation between the two lies in the tireless spin of campaign wheels. However, our research aims to unveil a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence and delves into uncharted territory. In this study, we aim to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the political leaning of Kansans and the automotive headaches faced by BMW of North America.
Ah, the exciting world of statistics and political science – where hypotheses collide, data dance, and correlation coefficients have been known to cause a stir! As we embark on this research venture, we cannot help but ponder: "Why did the statistician break up with the political scientist? They couldn't find a common ground!"
Combining the robust data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team navigated through a maze of numbers and trends in pursuit of uncovering the mysterious link between Democrat presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls. As we waded through the sea of electoral data and automobile mishaps, our mission was clear: to uncover the driving force behind this unlikely correlation and to draw attention to the potentially underexplored dynamics at play.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a p-value that tantalizingly flirts with statistical significance, our findings rev up a whirlwind of excitement and curiosity. It seems that these two variables are more intertwined than a stubborn lug nut on a rusty tire! After all, as we academics like to say, "Always trust a statistician, especially when they have a good 'car-ma'!"
Through our tireless dedication to unraveling this peculiar connection, we hope to add a dash of humor and intellectual curiosity to the discourse. As the engine of our research roars to life, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly joyride and explore the unexpected twists and turns that arise when blending politics, automotive industry events, and a sprinkle of statistical magic. After all, what's the point of research without a liberal dose of wit and whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Our statistical analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, it seems that as the Democrats in Kansas flex their political muscle, BMW's engines may be taking a few extra pit stops – talk about wheels in motion!

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7127138 indicates that approximately 71.27% of the variation in BMW recalls can be explained by the Democrat votes in Kansas. This high r-squared value suggests that the political climate in Kansas exerts a significant influence on the occurrence of automotive recalls by BMW. Looks like the impact of political advocacy extends far beyond just the campaign trail – it's revving up those car engines too!

The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, solidifying the strength of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the influence of political leanings in Kansas on BMW's automotive recall landscape is not just a fluke – it's a statistically robust phenomenon that demands attention. As the numbers tell their tale, we can't help but wonder if automotive recalls have become the 'elephant in the room' of Kansas politics – or maybe we should say, the 'BMW in the room'!

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the unmistakable correlation between the Democrat votes in Kansas and the number of automotive recalls by BMW of North America. The scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive relationship we uncovered through our rigorous statistical analysis, serving as a compelling visual testament to the unexpected connection between these two variables – a true showstopper, just like a well-executed parallel parking job!

Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we'll unpack the implications of this intriguing correlation and unfold the narrative of political dynamics intertwined with automotive mishaps, all while keeping the academic atmosphere lighthearted and engaging. After all, what's a research paper without a few pit stops for clever wordplay and dad jokes along the way? It's time to shift gears and navigate the ever-surprising highway where science meets humor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To lay the foundation for our exploration into the intriguing correlation between the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America, we turn to the insightful works of Smith, Doe, and Jones. In "Political Leanings in the American Heartland," Smith astutely analyzes the voting patterns in Kansas, shedding light on the complex dynamics at play. Meanwhile, Doe's "The Automotive Industry and Recalls: A Comprehensive Analysis" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to automotive recalls, setting the stage for our investigation. Last but not least, Jones' "Quantitative Methods in Political Science and Automotive Engineering" offers a meticulous examination of statistical techniques that are pertinent to our study.
Now, veering off the well-trodden path and into the realm of unconventional inspiration, we cannot overlook the wisdom imparted by non-fiction literary works. "The Art of Persuasion: Political Campaigns and Automotive Engineering" by Richard Powers and "Recalls and Repercussions: A Saga of Automotive Troubles" by Amanda Quick offer thought-provoking perspectives that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.
In the spirit of unexpected connections, let's not discount the potential insights that can be gleaned from fictional literature. Could there be a parallel universe where the characters of "The Great Gatsby" drive BMWs and passionately debate political ideologies? Or perhaps a dystopian world in which "1984" intersects with automotive mishaps in a manner that defies conventional logic?
Turning our attention to the small screen, it's worth noting the subtle but undeniable presence of our research topic in popular culture. For instance, the animated series "Cars" presents a whimsical yet surprisingly relatable portrayal of automotive experiences, with a potential for uncovering profound revelations. And let's not forget the educational potential inherent in children's shows such as "Paw Patrol," where the intersection of civic duty and mechanical malfunctions offers an unexpected yet insightful perspective.
In the illustrious words of pioneering researcher Dr. Seuss, "You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself in any direction you choose." With this eclectic blend of scholarly sources and whimsical inspiration, we are poised to traverse the uncharted terrain where politics, automotive industry events, and statistical prowess collide.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Our statistical analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, it seems that as the Democrats in Kansas flex their political muscle, BMW's engines may be taking a few extra pit stops – talk about wheels in motion!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7127138 indicates that approximately 71.27% of the variation in BMW recalls can be explained by the Democrat votes in Kansas. This high r-squared value suggests that the political climate in Kansas exerts a significant influence on the occurrence of automotive recalls by BMW. Looks like the impact of political advocacy extends far beyond just the campaign trail – it's revving up those car engines too!
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, solidifying the strength of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the influence of political leanings in Kansas on BMW's automotive recall landscape is not just a fluke – it's a statistically robust phenomenon that demands attention. As the numbers tell their tale, we can't help but wonder if automotive recalls have become the 'elephant in the room' of Kansas politics – or maybe we should say, the 'BMW in the room'!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the unmistakable correlation between the Democrat votes in Kansas and the number of automotive recalls by BMW of North America. The scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive relationship we uncovered through our rigorous statistical analysis, serving as a compelling visual testament to the unexpected connection between these two variables – a true showstopper, just like a well-executed parallel parking job!
Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we'll unpack the implications of this intriguing correlation and unfold the narrative of political dynamics intertwined with automotive mishaps, all while keeping the academic atmosphere lighthearted and engaging. After all, what's a research paper without a few pit stops for clever wordplay and dad jokes along the way? It's time to shift gears and navigate the ever-surprising highway where science meets humor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the wake of our groundbreaking findings, let's dive into the implications of the correlation we've uncovered between the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. While some may dismiss this connection as mere coincidence, our statistical analysis unequivocally demonstrates a significant relationship that can't be ignored. It seems that the Kansas political landscape and BMW's automotive tribulations are engaged in a tango that defies conventional wisdom – it's like an intricate dance routine composed of votes and vehicles, swaying to the rhythm of statistical significance.

Building on the scholarly works of Smith, Doe, and Jones, particularly their in-depth exploration of political leanings and automotive industry dynamics, our research aligns with their insights and further illuminates the interplay between these seemingly unrelated domains. The connection between political voting patterns and automotive woes is not just a far-fetched hypothesis; it's a statistically robust phenomenon that demands serious consideration. Talk about unexpected partnerships – this correlation has more drama and suspense than the latest political thriller meets automotive documentary.

Our results support the prior research that hinted at the intricate relationship between political leanings and industrial occurrences. Just like a well-crafted plot twist, the correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a p-value of less than 0.01 serve as a compelling climax that amplifies the storytelling power of statistics. It's as if the characters of political drama and automotive intrigue have been waiting for their moment to shine, and shine they have!

Returning to the whimsical inspirations from non-fiction and fiction literature mentioned in our literature review, who would have thought that the characters in "The Great Gatsby" might have a soft spot for BMWs, or that automotive mishaps align with the dystopian world of "1984"? While these musings may seem lighthearted, their presence in our exploration of serious statistical phenomena serves as a poignant reminder that unexpected connections often lead to revolutionary insights. Just like a good dad joke, these unexpected associations add a dash of humor and creativity to the otherwise serious nature of research.

In conclusion, our study has opened the door to an uncharted territory where political intrigue and automotive misfortunes harmonize in ways that challenge traditional boundaries. It's as if the car of statistical analysis has taken an unexpected turn onto the street of political discourse, unveiling a scenic route that invites us to witness the fascinating interplay between two seemingly disparate worlds. As we navigate this terrain, we are reminded that in the realm of research and statistical analysis, unexpected connections can lead to paradigm-shifting discoveries. Now, pardon the pun, but it seems the road ahead is paved with a fusion of data-driven insights and the occasional detour into the world of clever wordplay. Let's buckle up for the journey!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"

Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to politics and automotive recalls, one might think that the only correlation between the two lies in the tireless spin of campaign wheels. However, our research aims to unveil a connection that goes beyond mere coincidence and delves into uncharted territory. In this study, we aim to shed light on the unexpected relationship between the political leaning of Kansans and the automotive headaches faced by BMW of North America.
Ah, the exciting world of statistics and political science – where hypotheses collide, data dance, and correlation coefficients have been known to cause a stir! As we embark on this research venture, we cannot help but ponder: "Why did the statistician break up with the political scientist? They couldn't find a common ground!"
Combining the robust data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team navigated through a maze of numbers and trends in pursuit of uncovering the mysterious link between Democrat presidential votes in Kansas and BMW automotive recalls. As we waded through the sea of electoral data and automobile mishaps, our mission was clear: to uncover the driving force behind this unlikely correlation and to draw attention to the potentially underexplored dynamics at play.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a p-value that tantalizingly flirts with statistical significance, our findings rev up a whirlwind of excitement and curiosity. It seems that these two variables are more intertwined than a stubborn lug nut on a rusty tire! After all, as we academics like to say, "Always trust a statistician, especially when they have a good 'car-ma'!"
Through our tireless dedication to unraveling this peculiar connection, we hope to add a dash of humor and intellectual curiosity to the discourse. As the engine of our research roars to life, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly joyride and explore the unexpected twists and turns that arise when blending politics, automotive industry events, and a sprinkle of statistical magic. After all, what's the point of research without a liberal dose of wit and whimsy?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Our statistical analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. In other words, it seems that as the Democrats in Kansas flex their political muscle, BMW's engines may be taking a few extra pit stops – talk about wheels in motion!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7127138 indicates that approximately 71.27% of the variation in BMW recalls can be explained by the Democrat votes in Kansas. This high r-squared value suggests that the political climate in Kansas exerts a significant influence on the occurrence of automotive recalls by BMW. Looks like the impact of political advocacy extends far beyond just the campaign trail – it's revving up those car engines too!
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, solidifying the strength of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the influence of political leanings in Kansas on BMW's automotive recall landscape is not just a fluke – it's a statistically robust phenomenon that demands attention. As the numbers tell their tale, we can't help but wonder if automotive recalls have become the 'elephant in the room' of Kansas politics – or maybe we should say, the 'BMW in the room'!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the unmistakable correlation between the Democrat votes in Kansas and the number of automotive recalls by BMW of North America. The scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive relationship we uncovered through our rigorous statistical analysis, serving as a compelling visual testament to the unexpected connection between these two variables – a true showstopper, just like a well-executed parallel parking job!
Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we'll unpack the implications of this intriguing correlation and unfold the narrative of political dynamics intertwined with automotive mishaps, all while keeping the academic atmosphere lighthearted and engaging. After all, what's a research paper without a few pit stops for clever wordplay and dad jokes along the way? It's time to shift gears and navigate the ever-surprising highway where science meets humor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the unexpected correlation between the votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas and the automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America has driven our research into uncharted territory. It seems that the political landscape in Kansas not only shapes policy but may also have a 'wheel' impact on the automotive industry. We have certainly uncovered a correlation that has left us 'tire-d' yet 'revved' up with curiosity!

The statistically significant findings of our study highlight the need to consider the broader implications of political dynamics on industry occurrences. It appears that political advocacy may be 'steering' the course of automotive recalls in a direction we never anticipated. As we delve into the nuances of this peculiar connection, it's clear that these variables are more entwined than a confusing highway interchange – truly a 'crash course' in unexpected correlations!

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have revved up the engine of knowledge and 'road-tested' our findings. It's time to put the brakes on this line of inquiry and appreciate the 'humorous horsepower' that has fueled our journey. As they say, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" And just like atoms, our findings have certainly made up an unpredictable and entertaining story.

In this scholarly endeavor, we've navigated the highways and byways of politics and automotive industry happenings, all while injecting a healthy dose of humor and curiosity into our exploration. After all, what's research without a dash of wit and whimsy? It's time to park this study in the archives and marvel at the unexpected twists and turns we've discovered. No need for a GPS on this comedic research road – we've reached our destination!

And with that, we'll leave you with a final dad joke: "Why did the statistician bring a ladder to the BMW dealership? Because he wanted to compute the 'high-mileage' correlation!" Thank you for joining us on this scholarly joyride, and remember, when it comes to research, always buckle up for unexpected fun!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Statistical Oddities and Curiosities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Political and Automotive Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Democra-tick, BMW-ble Trouble: The Curious Case of the Correlation Between Democrat Presidential Votes in Kansas and BMW Automotive Recalls with an abstract of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. In this study, we uncover the unexpected relationship between the political leanings of Kansans and the automotive woes faced by BMW of North America. Combining data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, our research team delved into the obscure territory of Democratic votes and BMW recalls, all while maintaining our tireless dedication to unlocking the correlation between these seemingly disparate elements.
Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8442238 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1976 to 2020. This perplexing connection surely revs up a whirlwind of thought-provoking questions and leaves us pondering the interplay between the political landscape in Kansas and the manufacturing mishaps of the luxury automotive giant. As the saying goes, "There's always political mileage in automotive affairs!"
Through our in-depth analysis, we hope to spark a shift in the conversation surrounding the intersection of political voting patterns and automotive industry happenings, while providing a witty anecdote or two along the way. After all, what's a research paper without a little horsepower and some clever wordplay?

ChatGPT:

Democrat presidential votes Kansas, BMW automotive recalls, correlation, Kansans political leanings, BMW North America, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US DOT, correlation coefficient, p-value, years 1976-2020, political landscape Kansas, manufacturing mishaps, luxury automotive, political voting patterns, automotive industry, intersection, research paper, wordplay

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Kansas
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Kansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Kansas

Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by BMW of North America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America

Correlation r = 0.8442238 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7127138 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Kansas) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00055. 0.0005527613779407619000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.055% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,809 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.52, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Kansas (Total votes)430421326150333149422636390434387659399276434993514765440726427005570323
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America (Recalls)313352111716151736




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([430421,326150,333149,422636,390434,387659,399276,434993,514765,440726,427005,570323,])
array_2 = np.array([3,1,3,3,5,2,11,17,16,15,17,36,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 4880 · Black Variable ID: 25980 · Red Variable ID: 1121
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0