about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,153 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and the second variable is Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The 'that's what she said' meme led to more people seeking out jokes and humor, creating a ripple effect of laughter and engagement across the internet. It's like the meme became the unofficial commentator of her videos, adding an unexpected twist to every comment section!

Create a meme inspired by the thats what she said meme that in some way references Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme positively influenced Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
That's What She Said: A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

International Journal of Internet Memes and Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of online culture, memes have become the modern-day hieroglyphics, conveying layered meanings and humor across the digital landscape. These viral tidbits of wit and wisdom have woven their way into the fabric of internet communication, often prompting an involuntary chuckle or a wry grin from unsuspecting netizens. One such meme, the ubiquitous "that's what she said," has permeated pop culture and found its way into the most unexpected of places, including the comment sections of YouTube videos.

Simone Giertz, known for her quirky inventions and humorous takes on everyday problems, has amassed a dedicated following on YouTube. In the enchanting realm of her comment section, we embarked on a quest to uncover the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on her videos. What initially seemed like a frivolous venture into the whimsical world of internet ephemera has unearthed an unexpected correlation of notable significance.

The synergistic dance between the "that's what she said" meme's resonant chuckles and the digital cacophony of YouTube commentary presents a captivating tableau for our investigation. We were captivated by the prospect of unraveling this curious alignment, akin to unearthing a hidden treasure chest of comedic gold nestled among a sea of textual banter. The juxtaposition of humor and statistical analysis may seem as incongruous as a clown at a financial symposium, yet our intrepid exploration has yielded compelling evidence of their intertwined connection.

Amidst the statistical rigidity and empirical scrutiny lies a whimsical tale of unexpected discovery, where the delightful absurdity of meme culture meets the structured confines of quantitative analysis. Our quest for understanding this enchanting linkage has not only tickled the fancy of our research team but has also illuminated the playful interplay between virtual humor and digital engagement.

As we embark on this scholarly whimsy, let the swirling mists of data and mirth guide us through the uncharted waters of internet culture. Let us steer our scholarly vessel with a steady hand and a glimmer in our eye, for the comedic tides of the digital ocean hold many a treasure waiting to be unearthed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of online culture, memes have become the modern-day hieroglyphics, conveying layered meanings and humor across the digital landscape. These viral tidbits of wit and wisdom have woven their way into the fabric of internet communication, often prompting an involuntary chuckle or a wry grin from unsuspecting netizens. One such meme, the ubiquitous "that's what she said," has permeated pop culture and found its way into the most unexpected of places, including the comment sections of YouTube videos.
Simone Giertz, known for her quirky inventions and humorous takes on everyday problems, has amassed a dedicated following on YouTube. In the enchanting realm of her comment section, we embarked on a quest to uncover the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on her videos. What initially seemed like a frivolous venture into the whimsical world of internet ephemera has unearthed an unexpected correlation of notable significance.
The synergistic dance between the "that's what she said" meme's resonant chuckles and the digital cacophony of YouTube commentary presents a captivating tableau for our investigation. We were captivated by the prospect of unraveling this curious alignment, akin to unearthing a hidden treasure chest of comedic gold nestled among a sea of textual banter. The juxtaposition of humor and statistical analysis may seem as incongruous as a clown at a financial symposium, yet our intrepid exploration has yielded compelling evidence of their intertwined connection.
Amidst the statistical rigidity and empirical scrutiny lies a whimsical tale of unexpected discovery, where the delightful absurdity of meme culture meets the structured confines of quantitative analysis. Our quest for understanding this enchanting linkage has not only tickled the fancy of our research team but has also illuminated the playful interplay between virtual humor and digital engagement.
As we embark on this scholarly whimsy, let the swirling mists of data and mirth guide us through the uncharted waters of internet culture. Let us steer our scholarly vessel with a steady hand and a glimmer in our eye, for the comedic tides of the digital ocean hold many a treasure waiting to be unearthed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the tantalizing relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has led us on a fascinating journey through a myriad of scholarly works and cultural artifacts. In Smith's work "The Interplay of Online Humor and Digital Engagement," the authors shed light on the nuanced dynamics of humor in online spaces, setting the stage for our exploration of the unexpected union between a timeless jest and virtual commentary. Furthermore, Doe's examination "Memes and Measurable Impacts: Unveiling the Veiled Influence of Internet Culture" provides valuable insights into the societal ripple effects of meme propagation, offering a compelling framework for our investigation.

As we delved deeper into the literature, we encountered books such as "Viral: How Social Networking Is Poised to Ignite Revival" by Ryan Holmes and "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference" by Malcolm Gladwell, which expounded on the contagious nature of cultural phenomena and the peculiar tipping points that propel them into the limelight. These works served as guideposts in our quest to understand how the "that's what she said" meme, with its inherent comedic essence, has surreptitiously embedded itself within the fabric of digital content consumption.

In a delightfully unconventional turn, our exploration also led us to consider fiction works that, while not empirical in nature, offered a whimsical parallel to our research theme. "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett, with their irreverent humor and uncanny knack for blending the absurd with the profound, resonated with the spirit of our investigation. These literary escapades into comedic realms provided a refreshing perspective on the interplay between levity and the profound, mirroring the playful duality inherent in our research pursuit.

Moreover, the emergence of internet memes such as the "Rickroll" and the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme served as poignant reminders of the whimsical and often enigmatic nature of online humor. The surreptitious infiltration of these memes into the digital lexicon mirrors the subtle entry of the "that's what she said" meme into the eclectic tapestry of YouTube comments, hinting at the elaborate dance between cultural relevance and digital engagement.

As our scholarly vessel navigates the uncharted waters of meme culture and digital interaction, our literature review has unfurled a tapestry of comedic whimsy, intertwining empirical scrutiny with playful exploration. In the spirit of our research venture, let us embrace the mirthful dance of academic inquiry and levity as we unravel the unconventional synergy between a seemingly innocuous jest and the bustling arena of YouTube commentary.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of online culture, memes have become the modern-day hieroglyphics, conveying layered meanings and humor across the digital landscape. These viral tidbits of wit and wisdom have woven their way into the fabric of internet communication, often prompting an involuntary chuckle or a wry grin from unsuspecting netizens. One such meme, the ubiquitous "that's what she said," has permeated pop culture and found its way into the most unexpected of places, including the comment sections of YouTube videos.
Simone Giertz, known for her quirky inventions and humorous takes on everyday problems, has amassed a dedicated following on YouTube. In the enchanting realm of her comment section, we embarked on a quest to uncover the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on her videos. What initially seemed like a frivolous venture into the whimsical world of internet ephemera has unearthed an unexpected correlation of notable significance.
The synergistic dance between the "that's what she said" meme's resonant chuckles and the digital cacophony of YouTube commentary presents a captivating tableau for our investigation. We were captivated by the prospect of unraveling this curious alignment, akin to unearthing a hidden treasure chest of comedic gold nestled among a sea of textual banter. The juxtaposition of humor and statistical analysis may seem as incongruous as a clown at a financial symposium, yet our intrepid exploration has yielded compelling evidence of their intertwined connection.
Amidst the statistical rigidity and empirical scrutiny lies a whimsical tale of unexpected discovery, where the delightful absurdity of meme culture meets the structured confines of quantitative analysis. Our quest for understanding this enchanting linkage has not only tickled the fancy of our research team but has also illuminated the playful interplay between virtual humor and digital engagement.
As we embark on this scholarly whimsy, let the swirling mists of data and mirth guide us through the uncharted waters of internet culture. Let us steer our scholarly vessel with a steady hand and a glimmer in our eye, for the comedic tides of the digital ocean hold many a treasure waiting to be unearthed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
To embark on our whimsical journey into the enigmatic relationship between the "that's what she said" meme and total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, we navigated the turbulent seas of internet data collection. We cast our digital nets far and wide, spanning the electronic domain to ensnare the elusive details required for our scientific odyssey. Our primary sources of information included Google Trends and the YouTube platform, where the subtle nuances of online engagement and meme popularity were laid bare for our analytical perusal.

Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with an unyielding resolve and a hearty supply of caffeinated beverages to fuel our scholarly pursuits, we endeavored to unravel this digital enigma using the formidable arsenal of quantitative analysis. Adopting a multifaceted approach, we undertook a thorough examination of the search interest in the "that's what she said" meme as reflected in Google Trends data. Concurrently, we delved into the labyrinth of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel to extract the total comments on her videos, meticulously documenting the ebb and flow of digital discourse within her domain.

Correlation Assessment:
With our treasure trove of data secured, we harnessed the power of statistical tools to unveil the hidden bonds between meme merriment and YouTube commentary. Employing the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient, we sought to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's videos. Furthermore, we subjected our findings to the rigorous scrutiny of inferential statistics, unveiling the graphical contours of our correlation through scatterplots that danced with the lively cadence of humor and engagement.

Temporal Analysis:
As the currents of time pulled us inexorably forward, our journey transcended the constraints of a singular snapshot in the digital ocean. Embracing the historical tapestry of online trends, we conducted a temporal analysis encompassing the years from 2014 to 2023. This expansive timeframe allowed us to trace the undulating waves of meme notoriety and YouTube interaction, illuminating any dynamic shifts or enduring constellations within this whimsical linkage.

Sensitivity Analysis:
In acknowledgement of the capricious nature of internet culture and the mercurial fickleness of meme prominence, we engaged in a sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of our findings. By scrutinizing various subperiods and conducting dynamic assessments of correlation stability, we sought to fortify the confidence in our results and ensure that the breeze of statistical significance did not waver in the face of digital whimsy.

Ethical Considerations:
Amidst the raucous laughter and spirited banter that pervade the online sphere, we remain steadfast in upholding the principles of ethical research conduct. Our data collection and analysis adhered to the stringent guidelines of privacy and intellectual property, upholding the integrity of our scholarly pursuits as we navigated the tempestuous terrain of internet data harvesting.

In navigating this academic expedition, we approached our methodology with a blend of scientific rigor and irrepressible mirth, forging a path through the digital labyrinth that straddles the realms of jest and inquiry. As our scholarly compass pointed towards the heart of meme culture and online engagement, we welcomed the delightful paradox of solemn analysis and whimsical subject matter, venturing forth with a twinkle in our eye and a discerning statistical gaze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9060519, r-squared of 0.8209301, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of online culture, memes have become the modern-day hieroglyphics, conveying layered meanings and humor across the digital landscape. These viral tidbits of wit and wisdom have woven their way into the fabric of internet communication, often prompting an involuntary chuckle or a wry grin from unsuspecting netizens. One such meme, the ubiquitous "that's what she said," has permeated pop culture and found its way into the most unexpected of places, including the comment sections of YouTube videos.
Simone Giertz, known for her quirky inventions and humorous takes on everyday problems, has amassed a dedicated following on YouTube. In the enchanting realm of her comment section, we embarked on a quest to uncover the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on her videos. What initially seemed like a frivolous venture into the whimsical world of internet ephemera has unearthed an unexpected correlation of notable significance.
The synergistic dance between the "that's what she said" meme's resonant chuckles and the digital cacophony of YouTube commentary presents a captivating tableau for our investigation. We were captivated by the prospect of unraveling this curious alignment, akin to unearthing a hidden treasure chest of comedic gold nestled among a sea of textual banter. The juxtaposition of humor and statistical analysis may seem as incongruous as a clown at a financial symposium, yet our intrepid exploration has yielded compelling evidence of their intertwined connection.
Amidst the statistical rigidity and empirical scrutiny lies a whimsical tale of unexpected discovery, where the delightful absurdity of meme culture meets the structured confines of quantitative analysis. Our quest for understanding this enchanting linkage has not only tickled the fancy of our research team but has also illuminated the playful interplay between virtual humor and digital engagement.
As we embark on this scholarly whimsy, let the swirling mists of data and mirth guide us through the uncharted waters of internet culture. Let us steer our scholarly vessel with a steady hand and a glimmer in our eye, for the comedic tides of the digital ocean hold many a treasure waiting to be unearthed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9060519, indicating a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos from 2014 to 2023. The coefficient of determination, represented by an r-squared value of 0.8209301, signifies that approximately 82.09% of the variance in the total comments can be explained by the popularity of the meme. The statistical analysis also indicated a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness and significance of this correlation.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the compelling relationship between the two variables, portraying a clear pattern of engagement that mirrors the ebb and flow of the meme's popularity. The scatterplot itself could be considered a work of art, akin to a digital masterpiece that subtly winks at the viewer, encapsulating the whimsical nature of our findings.

These results uncover a fascinating interplay between digital humor and online interaction, demonstrating that the "that's what she said" meme has more than just a punchline—it has the power to spark conversation and elicit engagement in the virtual realm. The surprising resilience of this meme as a cornerstone of internet banter highlights its impact as an invisible thread that weaves through the fabric of online discourse, adding a touch of levity to the digital landscape.

Moreover, our findings underscore the multifaceted nature of internet culture, where seemingly disparate phenomena can converge to create an unexpected resonance. The interconnectedness of meme culture and digital content consumption elucidates the whimsical and often overlooked role of humor in shaping online behavior, echoing through the virtual corridors of cyberspace with the resonance of a well-timed punchline.

This investigation not only sheds light on the lighthearted influence of meme culture but also emphasizes the merit of exploring unanticipated connections in the digital domain, where the seemingly incongruous can coalesce into a harmonious symphony of statistical significance and comedic impact. In essence, the findings of this study serve as a reminder that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there's always room for a well-placed quip or a meme-orable observation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the tantalizing relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has led us on a fascinating journey through a myriad of scholarly works and cultural artifacts. In Smith's work "The Interplay of Online Humor and Digital Engagement," the authors shed light on the nuanced dynamics of humor in online spaces, setting the stage for our exploration of the unexpected union between a timeless jest and virtual commentary. Furthermore, Doe's examination "Memes and Measurable Impacts: Unveiling the Veiled Influence of Internet Culture" provides valuable insights into the societal ripple effects of meme propagation, offering a compelling framework for our investigation.
As we delved deeper into the literature, we encountered books such as "Viral: How Social Networking Is Poised to Ignite Revival" by Ryan Holmes and "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference" by Malcolm Gladwell, which expounded on the contagious nature of cultural phenomena and the peculiar tipping points that propel them into the limelight. These works served as guideposts in our quest to understand how the "that's what she said" meme, with its inherent comedic essence, has surreptitiously embedded itself within the fabric of digital content consumption.
In a delightfully unconventional turn, our exploration also led us to consider fiction works that, while not empirical in nature, offered a whimsical parallel to our research theme. "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett, with their irreverent humor and uncanny knack for blending the absurd with the profound, resonated with the spirit of our investigation. These literary escapades into comedic realms provided a refreshing perspective on the interplay between levity and the profound, mirroring the playful duality inherent in our research pursuit.
Moreover, the emergence of internet memes such as the "Rickroll" and the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme served as poignant reminders of the whimsical and often enigmatic nature of online humor. The surreptitious infiltration of these memes into the digital lexicon mirrors the subtle entry of the "that's what she said" meme into the eclectic tapestry of YouTube comments, hinting at the elaborate dance between cultural relevance and digital engagement.
As our scholarly vessel navigates the uncharted waters of meme culture and digital interaction, our literature review has unfurled a tapestry of comedic whimsy, intertwining empirical scrutiny with playful exploration. In the spirit of our research venture, let us embrace the mirthful dance of academic inquiry and levity as we unravel the unconventional synergy between a seemingly innocuous jest and the bustling arena of YouTube commentary.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9060519, indicating a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos from 2014 to 2023. The coefficient of determination, represented by an r-squared value of 0.8209301, signifies that approximately 82.09% of the variance in the total comments can be explained by the popularity of the meme. The statistical analysis also indicated a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness and significance of this correlation.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the compelling relationship between the two variables, portraying a clear pattern of engagement that mirrors the ebb and flow of the meme's popularity. The scatterplot itself could be considered a work of art, akin to a digital masterpiece that subtly winks at the viewer, encapsulating the whimsical nature of our findings.
These results uncover a fascinating interplay between digital humor and online interaction, demonstrating that the "that's what she said" meme has more than just a punchline—it has the power to spark conversation and elicit engagement in the virtual realm. The surprising resilience of this meme as a cornerstone of internet banter highlights its impact as an invisible thread that weaves through the fabric of online discourse, adding a touch of levity to the digital landscape.
Moreover, our findings underscore the multifaceted nature of internet culture, where seemingly disparate phenomena can converge to create an unexpected resonance. The interconnectedness of meme culture and digital content consumption elucidates the whimsical and often overlooked role of humor in shaping online behavior, echoing through the virtual corridors of cyberspace with the resonance of a well-timed punchline.
This investigation not only sheds light on the lighthearted influence of meme culture but also emphasizes the merit of exploring unanticipated connections in the digital domain, where the seemingly incongruous can coalesce into a harmonious symphony of statistical significance and comedic impact. In essence, the findings of this study serve as a reminder that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there's always room for a well-placed quip or a meme-orable observation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos has elicited a riveting array of insights. Our findings not only underscore the robust and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly incongruent entities but also unveil the playful whimsy and unexpected resonance underlying this connection. This investigation inherently defies conventional expectations, much like the unpredictable delight of stumbling upon a surreptitious punchline.

We threadingly interlace our results with the humorous underpinnings of our literature review, mirroring the lighthearted spirit of meme culture with empirical scrutiny. The resounding resonance of our correlation coefficient echoes the nuanced dynamics of laughter, where a well-timed jest can reverberate through the corridors of commentary with the infectious allure of comedic camaraderie. In a world replete with unanticipated connections, our study serves as a capricious dance of statistical significance and jestful examination.

Delving into the academic tapestry that informs our findings, we recall the whimsical musings of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," where the serendipitous alignment of seemingly unrelated occurrences takes center stage. Our results align with these unpredictable convergences, illustrating that even the most unassuming of jests can chart a course that intertwines with the fabric of digital engagement.

The scatterplot, depicted with a wink and a nod in its unspoken aesthetic allure, encapsulates the very ebb and flow of meme culture's impact on digital discussion. More than a mere visual representation, it serves as a subversive work of art, wryly echoing the meme's own persistence and adaptability in the virtual landscape.

The mirthful dance of academic inquiry and levity that has propelled our research serves as a poignant reminder that beneath the veneer of statistical rigor lies the enduring allure of humor, igniting engagement and fostering connection. Through the lens of this investigation, we illuminate the underlying playfulness that shapes our digital interactions, showcasing how a well-placed quip can translate into a tempest of commentary, all within the subtle realm of a "that's what she said" meme.

In essence, our findings not only exemplify the enduring legacy of digital humor but also offer a lens through which we can appreciate the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate online phenomena. Our research acts as a testament to the timeless impact of levity, illuminating the remarkable journey of a timeless meme as it continues to intersect with the digital tapestry, forever altering the landscape with its unassuming jest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme and Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"That's What She Said": A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.

While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.

In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of online culture, memes have become the modern-day hieroglyphics, conveying layered meanings and humor across the digital landscape. These viral tidbits of wit and wisdom have woven their way into the fabric of internet communication, often prompting an involuntary chuckle or a wry grin from unsuspecting netizens. One such meme, the ubiquitous "that's what she said," has permeated pop culture and found its way into the most unexpected of places, including the comment sections of YouTube videos.
Simone Giertz, known for her quirky inventions and humorous takes on everyday problems, has amassed a dedicated following on YouTube. In the enchanting realm of her comment section, we embarked on a quest to uncover the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on her videos. What initially seemed like a frivolous venture into the whimsical world of internet ephemera has unearthed an unexpected correlation of notable significance.
The synergistic dance between the "that's what she said" meme's resonant chuckles and the digital cacophony of YouTube commentary presents a captivating tableau for our investigation. We were captivated by the prospect of unraveling this curious alignment, akin to unearthing a hidden treasure chest of comedic gold nestled among a sea of textual banter. The juxtaposition of humor and statistical analysis may seem as incongruous as a clown at a financial symposium, yet our intrepid exploration has yielded compelling evidence of their intertwined connection.
Amidst the statistical rigidity and empirical scrutiny lies a whimsical tale of unexpected discovery, where the delightful absurdity of meme culture meets the structured confines of quantitative analysis. Our quest for understanding this enchanting linkage has not only tickled the fancy of our research team but has also illuminated the playful interplay between virtual humor and digital engagement.
As we embark on this scholarly whimsy, let the swirling mists of data and mirth guide us through the uncharted waters of internet culture. Let us steer our scholarly vessel with a steady hand and a glimmer in our eye, for the comedic tides of the digital ocean hold many a treasure waiting to be unearthed.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9060519, indicating a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos from 2014 to 2023. The coefficient of determination, represented by an r-squared value of 0.8209301, signifies that approximately 82.09% of the variance in the total comments can be explained by the popularity of the meme. The statistical analysis also indicated a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the robustness and significance of this correlation.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the compelling relationship between the two variables, portraying a clear pattern of engagement that mirrors the ebb and flow of the meme's popularity. The scatterplot itself could be considered a work of art, akin to a digital masterpiece that subtly winks at the viewer, encapsulating the whimsical nature of our findings.
These results uncover a fascinating interplay between digital humor and online interaction, demonstrating that the "that's what she said" meme has more than just a punchline—it has the power to spark conversation and elicit engagement in the virtual realm. The surprising resilience of this meme as a cornerstone of internet banter highlights its impact as an invisible thread that weaves through the fabric of online discourse, adding a touch of levity to the digital landscape.
Moreover, our findings underscore the multifaceted nature of internet culture, where seemingly disparate phenomena can converge to create an unexpected resonance. The interconnectedness of meme culture and digital content consumption elucidates the whimsical and often overlooked role of humor in shaping online behavior, echoing through the virtual corridors of cyberspace with the resonance of a well-timed punchline.
This investigation not only sheds light on the lighthearted influence of meme culture but also emphasizes the merit of exploring unanticipated connections in the digital domain, where the seemingly incongruous can coalesce into a harmonious symphony of statistical significance and comedic impact. In essence, the findings of this study serve as a reminder that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there's always room for a well-placed quip or a meme-orable observation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the prevalence of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. The statistical analyses revealed a robust connection between the lighthearted meme and the digital engagement it sparks, highlighting the powerful influence of humor in shaping online interactions. Our findings showcase how seemingly inconsequential comedic phrases can ripple through the digital ether, eliciting a chorus of virtual chuckles and igniting a lively exchange of banter.

The whimsical interplay between meme culture and online engagement offers a delightful reminder that even in the realm of quantitative analysis, there is room for the unexpected and the amusing. The research journey itself has been akin to navigating a meandering river of data, occasionally punctuated by the buoyant levity of meme-centric discoveries. As we charted this scholarly adventure, we couldn't help but appreciate the colorful tapestry of online culture and the intriguing, if not slightly absurd, connections that underlie it.

While our study sheds light on the interwoven nature of digital humor and engagement, it also underscores the entertaining and often unexplored terrain of internet culture. The resonant impact of the "that's what she said" meme serves as a testament to the enduring appeal of clever wordplay and the unexpected places where it can manifest. As we conclude this exploration, it's evident that the digital landscape holds within it a treasure trove of comedic nuances waiting to be unveiled, tickling the intellectual curiosity of researchers and meme enthusiasts alike.

Therefore, we assert that no further research in this area is needed, as we have uncovered the hidden hilarity within the statistical confines of our investigation and can confidently say, "that's what we found, and it's statistically significant."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited That's What She Said: A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

International Journal of Internet Memes and Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited That's What She Said: A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Memetics Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled That's What She Said: A Meme-orable Connection to YouTube Activity with an abstract of This study investigates the unexpected relationship between the popularity of the "that's what she said" meme and the total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we employed quantitative analysis to unveil the correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings disclosed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9060519 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2023.
While the phrase "that's what she said" may appear trivial, our study illuminates its profound impact on online discourse and engagement. The merging of meme culture and digital content consumption unveils a humorous and unanticipated connection that tickles both the academic and comedic sensibilities of our research team. Our results illuminate the delightful peculiarity and interconnectedness of online phenomena, demonstrating how humor often serves as an invisible force shaping online interaction.
In conclusion, this investigation provides compelling evidence of a synergistic relationship between a meme's cultural resonance and the engagement with content on a popular online platform. This research not only offers a humorous lens for understanding online behavior but also underscores the importance of exploring unexpected connections in the digital landscape.

ChatGPT:

YouTube activity, meme impact, "that's what she said" meme, Google Trends, quantitative analysis, YouTube comments, online discourse, digital content consumption, meme culture, online engagement, humor, digital phenomena, cultural resonance, online platform engagement, unexpected connections, digital landscape

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'thats what she said' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme

Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total comments on Simone Giertz YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9060519 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8209301 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme) over the 10 years from 2014 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000304. 0.0003038836503469708500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0304% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,291 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme (Relative popularity)9.59.759.1666711.16671414.251110.259.333338.33333
Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos (Total comments)833776534222543731185719349154545382912196527032




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.5,9.75,9.16667,11.1667,14,14.25,11,10.25,9.33333,8.33333,])
array_2 = np.array([833,7765,34222,54373,118571,93491,54545,38291,21965,27032,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme"
array_2_name = "Total comments on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5153 · Black Variable ID: 25169 · Red Variable ID: 25697
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0