Download png, svg
AI explanation
The cleaner air in Red Bluff led to a boom in amateur geology, with residents accidentally discovering and hoarding rare earth elements in their backyards, causing a shortage in the global market. It just goes to show, when the air is cleaner, the ground gets greedier!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic landscape in Red Bluff, California, characterized by vibrant cybernetic art. Show rolling green hills and blue skies overlooking a group of residents joyfully digging in their backyards, revealing colorful, glistening rocks. In the distance, display a line of sleek cargo ships laden with containers labeled "Rare Earth Elements - From China," floating against the horizon. Include a prominent sign at the center of the scene reading "Air Pollution Free Zone," emphasizing the contrast between the clean air and the growing fascination with rare earth elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Data cyber art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Art nouveau Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume, in the following situation: The cleaner air in Red Bluff led to a boom in amateur geology, with residents accidentally discovering and hoarding rare earth elements in their backyards, causing a shortage in the global market. It just goes to show, when the air is cleaner, the ground gets greedier!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Red Bluff, California, the clear blue sky overlooks rolling hills and green trees. A group of residents, equipped with shovels and buckets, excitedly dig in their backyards, uncovering colorful rocks that glisten in the sunlight. Meanwhile, a line of cargo ships can be seen in the distance, loaded with containers labeled "Rare Earth Elements - From China." In the center of this bustling scene, a sign reads "Air Pollution Free Zone," highlighting the unique juxtaposition of the cleaner air and the newfound obsession with rare earth elements.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In Red Bluff, California, the clear blue sky overlooks rolling hills and green trees. A group of residents, equipped with shovels and buckets, excitedly dig in their backyards, uncovering colorful rocks that glisten in the sunlight. Meanwhile, a line of cargo ships can be seen in the distance, loaded with containers labeled "Rare Earth Elements - From China." In the center of this bustling scene, a sign reads "Air Pollution Free Zone," highlighting the unique juxtaposition of the cleaner air and the newfound obsession with rare earth elements. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic landscape in Red Bluff, California, characterized by vibrant cybernetic art. Show rolling green hills and blue skies overlooking a group of residents joyfully digging in their backyards, revealing colorful, glistening rocks. In the distance, display a line of sleek cargo ships laden with containers labeled "Rare Earth Elements - From China," floating against the horizon. Include a prominent sign at the center of the scene reading "Air Pollution Free Zone," emphasizing the contrast between the clean air and the growing fascination with rare earth elements.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Red Bluff, California caused China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume The Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry and Geopolitical Economics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2015.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Ah, the sweet sound of science – the clinking of beakers, the swishing of test tubes, and the occasional exasperated sigh from researchers trying to make sense of correlation coefficients and p-values. In this whimsical yet informative paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between the air pollution levels in the bucolic town of Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. As we delve into the data with the tenacity of a Nautilus prowling the ocean depths, we hope to unearth insights that are as rare as, well, rare earth elements.
Our investigation, akin to a Sherlock Holmes mystery with a scientific twist, grapples with the undeniable link between environmental conditions and the economic machinations of rare earth elements. Picture this – a miasma of statistical analyses, a smog of hypotheses, and a breath of fresh air awaiting us at the conclusion. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the illuminative insights from Statista, we saunter through the decade from 2005 to 2015, seeking the hidden threads connecting the seemingly disparate realms of air quality and international trade.
Now, all this talk of correlation coefficients and p-values may seem daunting, but fear not! We promise to sprinkle in some statistical humor along the way. After all, why did the statistician avoid using the restroom? Because he was number one! (Yes, we know, it's a groan-worthy pun, but it's the best we've got.)
So, let's dust off our goggles, straighten our lab coats, and dive into this adventure, armed with nothing but our wits, data, and a dash of scientific humor. It's time to uncover the mysteries hiding in the air and the earth – and who knows, we might just stumble upon a few rare pearls of wisdom along the way. Join us, won't you?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet sound of science – the clinking of beakers, the swishing of test tubes, and the occasional exasperated sigh from researchers trying to make sense of correlation coefficients and p-values. In this whimsical yet informative paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between the air pollution levels in the bucolic town of Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. As we delve into the data with the tenacity of a Nautilus prowling the ocean depths, we hope to unearth insights that are as rare as, well, rare earth elements.
Our investigation, akin to a Sherlock Holmes mystery with a scientific twist, grapples with the undeniable link between environmental conditions and the economic machinations of rare earth elements. Picture this – a miasma of statistical analyses, a smog of hypotheses, and a breath of fresh air awaiting us at the conclusion. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the illuminative insights from Statista, we saunter through the decade from 2005 to 2015, seeking the hidden threads connecting the seemingly disparate realms of air quality and international trade.
Now, all this talk of correlation coefficients and p-values may seem daunting, but fear not! We promise to sprinkle in some statistical humor along the way. After all, why did the statistician avoid using the restroom? Because he was number one! (Yes, we know, it's a groan-worthy pun, but it's the best we've got.)
So, let's dust off our goggles, straighten our lab coats, and dive into this adventure, armed with nothing but our wits, data, and a dash of scientific humor. It's time to uncover the mysteries hiding in the air and the earth – and who knows, we might just stumble upon a few rare pearls of wisdom along the way. Join us, won't you?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Venturing into the scholarly troves of research, we are met with a plethora of studies that, much like a fine wine, have matured over time in their endeavor to unravel the complexities of air pollution and its unexpected ties to the economics of rare earth elements. In "Smith et al.'s Exhaustive Study on Air Quality and International Trade," the authors find themselves caught in the gusts of data, analyzing the winds of change that blow from Red Bluff, California, to the bustling trade routes of China's rare earth element exports. As we navigate through the academic stratosphere, we encounter Doe and Jones' meticulous examination, "The Economic Implications of Smog: A Breath of Fresh Insight," where the authors provide a compelling argument for the impact of air pollution on the global market for rare earth elements.
Turning the pages of non-fiction literature, we stumble across "The Air We Breathe: A Global Perspective" by Clean Air Enthusiasts, and "Elemental Economics: Unearthing the Truth Behind Rare Earth Exports" by Resource Analysts United. Both tomes offer valuable insights, akin to finding a rare earth mineral in a coal mine, shedding light on the interplay between pollution and international trade. However, our journey through the literary landscape takes an unexpected turn as we encounter fiction works that strangely parallel our research topic - "The Smog Mysteries: A Novel Approach to Air Pollution" by Penny Farthing, and "The Rare Earth Heist: A Tale of Economic Intrigue" by Dirk Diamond.
In our quest for knowledge, we leave no stone unturned, no reference unexamined, and no avenue unexplored. With a gleeful disregard for convention, we venture into the annals of grocery receipts, scanning each CVS slip for potential insights – oh, the lengths we go for knowledge! Alas, as we contemplate the purchase of cough drops and air fresheners, we remind ourselves that amidst the scholarly pursuit lies a hidden opportunity for mirth and whimsy. Join us, dear reader, as we march forth in this academic odyssey, armed with data, humor, and perhaps a pinch of absurdity. A veritable treasure trove awaits – let us dig deeper!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista . You used data from 2005 to 2015
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet sound of science – the clinking of beakers, the swishing of test tubes, and the occasional exasperated sigh from researchers trying to make sense of correlation coefficients and p-values. In this whimsical yet informative paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between the air pollution levels in the bucolic town of Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. As we delve into the data with the tenacity of a Nautilus prowling the ocean depths, we hope to unearth insights that are as rare as, well, rare earth elements.
Our investigation, akin to a Sherlock Holmes mystery with a scientific twist, grapples with the undeniable link between environmental conditions and the economic machinations of rare earth elements. Picture this – a miasma of statistical analyses, a smog of hypotheses, and a breath of fresh air awaiting us at the conclusion. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the illuminative insights from Statista, we saunter through the decade from 2005 to 2015, seeking the hidden threads connecting the seemingly disparate realms of air quality and international trade.
Now, all this talk of correlation coefficients and p-values may seem daunting, but fear not! We promise to sprinkle in some statistical humor along the way. After all, why did the statistician avoid using the restroom? Because he was number one! (Yes, we know, it's a groan-worthy pun, but it's the best we've got.)
So, let's dust off our goggles, straighten our lab coats, and dive into this adventure, armed with nothing but our wits, data, and a dash of scientific humor. It's time to uncover the mysteries hiding in the air and the earth – and who knows, we might just stumble upon a few rare pearls of wisdom along the way. Join us, won't you?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To capture the elusive relationship between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume, we concocted a methodological mishmash that could rival the zaniest experiments of Dr. Frankenstein. Our data collection began with a digital safari across the internet, where we hunted down relevant information with a fervor that would make Indiana Jones proud – albeit with fewer booby traps and more Excel spreadsheets.
First on our list of internet haunts was the Environmental Protection Agency's treasure trove of air quality data. We strapped on our virtual oxygen masks and dove headfirst into a sea of pollutant concentrations, armed with the determination of adventurers seeking hidden treasure. Next, we wandered into the digital labyrinth of Statista to unearth the export volumes of rare earth elements from the mystical land of China. Armed with our trusty calculators and a generous supply of coffee, we sifted through the numerical relics of a decade from 2005 to 2015, meticulously compiling the data that would become the bedrock of our analysis.
With our treasure trove of data in hand, we deployed the formidable forces of statistical analysis to quantify the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our artillery of choice included the venerable correlation coefficient, which, like a diligent detective, sought to decipher the cryptic clues hidden in the data. Alongside the correlation coefficient, we summoned the formidable p-value, a statistical stalwart that battled against spurious associations with the tenacity of a mythological dragon guarding its hoard of gold.
Now, before you roll your eyes at the prospect of more mind-numbing statistical jargon, let's sprinkle in a bit of statistical humor to keep things light. How does a statistician summon the enthusiasm to tackle yet another set of p-values? By believing that every dataset is a treasure map waiting to be unraveled! (Okay, we'll admit it – we're running out of statistical puns, but who said humor had to follow a normal distribution?)
Armed with the outputs of our statistical escapades, we landed on a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a p-value that proudly flaunted its insignificance – clocking in at less than 0.01. These results, much like a rare bouquet of orchids in a smog-choked city, bear witness to a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume.
So, there you have it, dear readers – our journey through the methodological maze, filled with statistical twists, turns, and just a dash of whimsy. We hope you'll join us as we venture further into the heart of our findings, ready to unearth the juicy implications that lie in the wake of this quirky correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista .
For the time period 2005 to 2015, you found a correlation 0.8070844, r-squared of 0.6513852, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the sweet sound of science – the clinking of beakers, the swishing of test tubes, and the occasional exasperated sigh from researchers trying to make sense of correlation coefficients and p-values. In this whimsical yet informative paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between the air pollution levels in the bucolic town of Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. As we delve into the data with the tenacity of a Nautilus prowling the ocean depths, we hope to unearth insights that are as rare as, well, rare earth elements.
Our investigation, akin to a Sherlock Holmes mystery with a scientific twist, grapples with the undeniable link between environmental conditions and the economic machinations of rare earth elements. Picture this – a miasma of statistical analyses, a smog of hypotheses, and a breath of fresh air awaiting us at the conclusion. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the illuminative insights from Statista, we saunter through the decade from 2005 to 2015, seeking the hidden threads connecting the seemingly disparate realms of air quality and international trade.
Now, all this talk of correlation coefficients and p-values may seem daunting, but fear not! We promise to sprinkle in some statistical humor along the way. After all, why did the statistician avoid using the restroom? Because he was number one! (Yes, we know, it's a groan-worthy pun, but it's the best we've got.)
So, let's dust off our goggles, straighten our lab coats, and dive into this adventure, armed with nothing but our wits, data, and a dash of scientific humor. It's time to uncover the mysteries hiding in the air and the earth – and who knows, we might just stumble upon a few rare pearls of wisdom along the way. Join us, won't you?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8070844, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This splendid correlation coefficient suggests that as the air pollution levels in Red Bluff increased, so did China's export volume of rare earth elements. It's as if the smog in Red Bluff whispered to China, "You can count on me to help drive up your rare earth element exports!"
Furthermore, our analysis yielded an impressive R-squared value of 0.6513852, indicating that approximately 65.1% of the variability in China's rare earth element export volume can be explained by the variability in Red Bluff's air pollution levels. It's like finding out that 65.1% of the time, the rise and fall of rare earth element exports from China can be predicted by simply checking the air quality in Red Bluff. Who would've thought that the air in the charming town of Red Bluff could have such a global impact?
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 emphasized the statistical significance of our findings. This means that there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation between air pollution in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume is due to random chance. Let's just say that the likelihood of such a strong relationship happening by sheer luck is rarer than, well, rare earth elements themselves!
To visualize the robust connection we unearthed, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. As we gaze upon this scatterplot, we can't help but marvel at how two seemingly disparate elements intertwine like a double helix, revealing the intricate dance of air quality and international trade.
In conclusion, our findings provide a breath of fresh air in understanding the intertwined dynamics of environmental factors and the global commerce of rare earth elements. This study not only offers a unique insight into the relationship between air pollution in a small Californian town and China's exports but also emphasizes the importance of considering environmental conditions in the analysis of international trade dynamics. With these results in hand, we've not only unraveled a peculiar correlation but also shed light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. This research serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables, much like the unexpected humor hiding in the depths of scientific research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Venturing into the scholarly troves of research, we are met with a plethora of studies that, much like a fine wine, have matured over time in their endeavor to unravel the complexities of air pollution and its unexpected ties to the economics of rare earth elements. In "Smith et al.'s Exhaustive Study on Air Quality and International Trade," the authors find themselves caught in the gusts of data, analyzing the winds of change that blow from Red Bluff, California, to the bustling trade routes of China's rare earth element exports. As we navigate through the academic stratosphere, we encounter Doe and Jones' meticulous examination, "The Economic Implications of Smog: A Breath of Fresh Insight," where the authors provide a compelling argument for the impact of air pollution on the global market for rare earth elements.
Turning the pages of non-fiction literature, we stumble across "The Air We Breathe: A Global Perspective" by Clean Air Enthusiasts, and "Elemental Economics: Unearthing the Truth Behind Rare Earth Exports" by Resource Analysts United. Both tomes offer valuable insights, akin to finding a rare earth mineral in a coal mine, shedding light on the interplay between pollution and international trade. However, our journey through the literary landscape takes an unexpected turn as we encounter fiction works that strangely parallel our research topic - "The Smog Mysteries: A Novel Approach to Air Pollution" by Penny Farthing, and "The Rare Earth Heist: A Tale of Economic Intrigue" by Dirk Diamond.
In our quest for knowledge, we leave no stone unturned, no reference unexamined, and no avenue unexplored. With a gleeful disregard for convention, we venture into the annals of grocery receipts, scanning each CVS slip for potential insights – oh, the lengths we go for knowledge! Alas, as we contemplate the purchase of cough drops and air fresheners, we remind ourselves that amidst the scholarly pursuit lies a hidden opportunity for mirth and whimsy. Join us, dear reader, as we march forth in this academic odyssey, armed with data, humor, and perhaps a pinch of absurdity. A veritable treasure trove awaits – let us dig deeper!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8070844, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This splendid correlation coefficient suggests that as the air pollution levels in Red Bluff increased, so did China's export volume of rare earth elements. It's as if the smog in Red Bluff whispered to China, "You can count on me to help drive up your rare earth element exports!"
Furthermore, our analysis yielded an impressive R-squared value of 0.6513852, indicating that approximately 65.1% of the variability in China's rare earth element export volume can be explained by the variability in Red Bluff's air pollution levels. It's like finding out that 65.1% of the time, the rise and fall of rare earth element exports from China can be predicted by simply checking the air quality in Red Bluff. Who would've thought that the air in the charming town of Red Bluff could have such a global impact?
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 emphasized the statistical significance of our findings. This means that there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation between air pollution in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume is due to random chance. Let's just say that the likelihood of such a strong relationship happening by sheer luck is rarer than, well, rare earth elements themselves!
To visualize the robust connection we unearthed, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. As we gaze upon this scatterplot, we can't help but marvel at how two seemingly disparate elements intertwine like a double helix, revealing the intricate dance of air quality and international trade.
In conclusion, our findings provide a breath of fresh air in understanding the intertwined dynamics of environmental factors and the global commerce of rare earth elements. This study not only offers a unique insight into the relationship between air pollution in a small Californian town and China's exports but also emphasizes the importance of considering environmental conditions in the analysis of international trade dynamics. With these results in hand, we've not only unraveled a peculiar correlation but also shed light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. This research serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables, much like the unexpected humor hiding in the depths of scientific research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have undoubtedly bolstered the offbeat yet intriguing discoveries of our scholarly predecessors. Just as "Smith et al.'s Exhaustive Study on Air Quality and International Trade" and "Doe and Jones' Meticulous Examination: The Economic Implications of Smog" anticipated, our research has provided empirical evidence of the relationship between the smoggy woes of Red Bluff and the soaring heights of China's rare earth element export volume. It's as if the tendrils of air pollution from Red Bluff have reached across the Pacific, giving China's rare earth element exports a breath of fresh smoggy air. The unexpected accord between our results and the comedic references we encountered in "The Smog Mysteries" and "The Rare Earth Heist" serves as a testament to the idiosyncrasies of academic research. Who would've thought that a novel approach to air pollution and economic intrigue would indeed echo the real-world dynamics we've unearthed?
Our analysis not only mirrors the thought-provoking insights found in "Elemental Economics: Unearthing the Truth Behind Rare Earth Exports" and "The Air We Breathe: A Global Perspective" but also expands upon them, much like a rare earth mineral unexpectedly found in a coal mine. Our robust correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 serves as a shining beacon, reinforcing the notion that the air quality in Red Bluff can be a significant factor in China's rare earth element exports. It's a relationship as solid as the chemical bonds in a rare earth mineral – not easily broken or disregarded.
The statistical significance of our findings, indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01, further cements the veracity of our results. Just like unearthing a rare earth element, the likelihood of stumbling upon such a strong relationship by sheer fluke is incredibly slim. Our findings aren't just as rare as rare earth elements; they're rarer than rare earth elements hidden in the depths of a mine.
Furthermore, the striking R-squared value of 0.6513852 showcases the substantial impact of Red Bluff's air pollution on China's rare earth element export volume. It's as if 65.1% of the time, the whims of the air in Red Bluff determine China's rare earth element exports, emphasizing the influence of environmental conditions on international trade dynamics. Our research has not only unearthed a surprising correlation but has also uplifted the vital role of environmental considerations in understanding patterns in global commerce.
Through this research, we've not only lit up the global interplay between environmental conditions and rare earth element economics but have also illuminated the unexpected humor and whimsy that can be found in the depths of scientific exploration. As we forge ahead in this academic odyssey, the unexpected connections we've uncovered serve as a reminder of the serendipity that often underlies the starched façade of scholarly pursuits.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Red Bluff, California and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet sound of science – the clinking of beakers, the swishing of test tubes, and the occasional exasperated sigh from researchers trying to make sense of correlation coefficients and p-values. In this whimsical yet informative paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the peculiar relationship between the air pollution levels in the bucolic town of Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. As we delve into the data with the tenacity of a Nautilus prowling the ocean depths, we hope to unearth insights that are as rare as, well, rare earth elements.
Our investigation, akin to a Sherlock Holmes mystery with a scientific twist, grapples with the undeniable link between environmental conditions and the economic machinations of rare earth elements. Picture this – a miasma of statistical analyses, a smog of hypotheses, and a breath of fresh air awaiting us at the conclusion. With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the illuminative insights from Statista, we saunter through the decade from 2005 to 2015, seeking the hidden threads connecting the seemingly disparate realms of air quality and international trade.
Now, all this talk of correlation coefficients and p-values may seem daunting, but fear not! We promise to sprinkle in some statistical humor along the way. After all, why did the statistician avoid using the restroom? Because he was number one! (Yes, we know, it's a groan-worthy pun, but it's the best we've got.)
So, let's dust off our goggles, straighten our lab coats, and dive into this adventure, armed with nothing but our wits, data, and a dash of scientific humor. It's time to uncover the mysteries hiding in the air and the earth – and who knows, we might just stumble upon a few rare pearls of wisdom along the way. Join us, won't you?
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.8070844, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This splendid correlation coefficient suggests that as the air pollution levels in Red Bluff increased, so did China's export volume of rare earth elements. It's as if the smog in Red Bluff whispered to China, "You can count on me to help drive up your rare earth element exports!"
Furthermore, our analysis yielded an impressive R-squared value of 0.6513852, indicating that approximately 65.1% of the variability in China's rare earth element export volume can be explained by the variability in Red Bluff's air pollution levels. It's like finding out that 65.1% of the time, the rise and fall of rare earth element exports from China can be predicted by simply checking the air quality in Red Bluff. Who would've thought that the air in the charming town of Red Bluff could have such a global impact?
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 emphasized the statistical significance of our findings. This means that there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation between air pollution in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume is due to random chance. Let's just say that the likelihood of such a strong relationship happening by sheer luck is rarer than, well, rare earth elements themselves!
To visualize the robust connection we unearthed, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. As we gaze upon this scatterplot, we can't help but marvel at how two seemingly disparate elements intertwine like a double helix, revealing the intricate dance of air quality and international trade.
In conclusion, our findings provide a breath of fresh air in understanding the intertwined dynamics of environmental factors and the global commerce of rare earth elements. This study not only offers a unique insight into the relationship between air pollution in a small Californian town and China's exports but also emphasizes the importance of considering environmental conditions in the analysis of international trade dynamics. With these results in hand, we've not only unraveled a peculiar correlation but also shed light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. This research serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated variables, much like the unexpected humor hiding in the depths of scientific research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
As we bid adieu to the strange and wondrous world of air pollution in Red Bluff, California, and China's rare earth element export volume, we can't help but celebrate our findings with a round of applause and a lungful of fresh air, or whatever fresh air we can find in this smog of statistical analysis!
Our zany journey through this research has not only unveiled the quirky correlation between these unlikely bedfellows but also left us with a deeper appreciation for the unpredictability of scientific exploration. Who would have thought that the air in Red Bluff could hold such sway over the international trade of rare earth elements? It's like discovering that a sneeze from Red Bluff could send ripples through the global market!
With a correlation coefficient so hearty, it's clear that these two variables are practically inseparable – like lab partners in an experiment gone right. The R-squared value of 0.6513852 is nothing short of astounding, revealing that nearly two-thirds of the roiling cauldron that is China's rare earth element export volume can be attributed to the atmospheric alchemy of Red Bluff. And that p-value? Less than 0.01? That's as rare as finding a unicorn in a pile of statistical analyses!
So, as we wrap up this rollicking adventure, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed in this area – unless, of course, we want to uncover even more uproarious connections between the unlikeliest of variables. After all, who knows what other bizarre links are hiding in the mists of data, just waiting to be unearthed? Until that time comes, we'll savor the sweet scent of scientific discovery and the occasional whiff of rare earth elements in the air. Cheers to a breath of fresh air in the world of research!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry and Geopolitical Economics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Ecological Advancements and Resource Assessment
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume with an abstract of In this paper, we undertake an investigation into the quirky correlation between the air pollution levels in Red Bluff, California, and the export volume of rare earth elements from China. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we scrutinize a decade-long period from 2005 to 2015. Our findings reveal a dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.8070844 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling link between the air quality in Red Bluff and China's rare earth element export volume. The results have implications that are nothing to sneeze at, shedding light on the global interplay between environmental conditions and the economics of rare earth elements. We hope this study leaves readers with a breath of fresh air amidst the often murky atmosphere of academic research.
ChatGPT:
air pollution, Red Bluff, California, rare earth elements, China, export volume, correlation, environmental conditions, statistics
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Red Bluff, CaliforniaDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Red Bluff, CA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Red Bluff, California
China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6513852 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Red Bluff, California) over the 11 years from 2005 through 2015.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0027. 0.0026735563096760780000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.27% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 374 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.4, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
Air pollution in Red Bluff, California (Bad air quality days) | 0.111864 | 0.138235 | 0.0807799 | 0.0987261 | 0.117424 | 0.0493151 | 0.0410959 | 0.0519126 | 0.030137 | 0.043956 | 0.0520548 |
China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume (Metric Tons) | 65680 | 61070 | 59643 | 49990 | 48155 | 30259 | 30246 | 30996 | 30999 | 3610 | 32136 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.111864,0.138235,0.0807799,0.0987261,0.117424,0.0493151,0.0410959,0.0519126,0.030137,0.043956,0.0520548,])
array_2 = np.array([65680,61070,59643,49990,48155,30259,30246,30996,30999,3610,32136,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Red Bluff, California"
array_2_name = "China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Red Bluff, California
- Line chart for only China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: A Breath of Fresh Air: Unearthing the Smoggy Relationship Between Red Bluff's Air Pollution and China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume
Kudos for rating!
Correlation ID: 5154 · Black Variable ID: 22241 · Red Variable ID: 418