about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,281 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Drenching rain in New York.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time it rains heavily in New York, a group of dedicated mathematicians and animators from 3Blue1Brown grab their umbrellas and head outside to reenact complex math concepts using dance choreography on the streets. This not only entertains passersby, but also inadvertently leads to a significant decrease in the geekiness level of their video titles. After all, you can only stay so nerdy while busting out the Pythagorean theorem in a flash mob during a downpour.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showcasing 3Blue1Brown's team dancing on the rainy streets of New York while reenacting complex math concepts, with passersby being entertained by the performance. The team is dressed in raincoats, holding umbrellas, and energetically demonstrating mathematical ideas through dance. The scene should emphasize the lighthearted and entertaining nature of the performance, with the surrounding rain adding a sense of dynamic movement to the atmosphere. The illustration should capture the curiosity and fascination of the onlookers as they watch the geeky yet captivating spectacle unfold in the heart of the city. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Minimalism Cutsy art illustration 3D Pixar Style Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York, in the following situation: Every time it rains heavily in New York, a group of dedicated mathematicians and animators from 3Blue1Brown grab their umbrellas and head outside to reenact complex math concepts using dance choreography on the streets. This not only entertains passersby, but also inadvertently leads to a significant decrease in the geekiness level of their video titles. After all, you can only stay so nerdy while busting out the Pythagorean theorem in a flash mob during a downpour.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Under a drenching rain in New York, 3Blue1Brown's team, clad in raincoats and holding umbrellas, dances on the city streets, reenacting complex math concepts. Passersby are entertained by the intricate choreography as the geekiness level of their video titles decreases with each rain-soaked performance.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: Under a drenching rain in New York, 3Blue1Brown's team, clad in raincoats and holding umbrellas, dances on the city streets, reenacting complex math concepts. Passersby are entertained by the intricate choreography as the geekiness level of their video titles decreases with each rain-soaked performance. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showcasing 3Blue1Brown's team dancing on the rainy streets of New York while reenacting complex math concepts, with passersby being entertained by the performance. The team is dressed in raincoats, holding umbrellas, and energetically demonstrating mathematical ideas through dance. The scene should emphasize the lighthearted and entertaining nature of the performance, with the surrounding rain adding a sense of dynamic movement to the atmosphere. The illustration should capture the curiosity and fascination of the onlookers as they watch the geeky yet captivating spectacle unfold in the heart of the city.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are caused Drenching rain in New York to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Atmospheric Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 and p < 0.05 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we enter the digital age, the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to fascinate and challenge researchers across diverse disciplines. In this study, we navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, setting sail on a voyage that spans both the windswept plains of mathematics education and the stormy skies of meteorology. Our quest? To uncover the murky connection between the geeky allure of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the deluge of drenching rain in New York City.

But before we dive into this swirling maelstrom of data, let us not forget to pack our umbrellas and a hearty supply of puns. After all, a little precipitation always adds an element of surprise, much like the uncertainty inherent in statistical analysis. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of only six inches? It just proves that, in research, depth is not always what it seems!

The intersection of mathematics and meteorology may seem as improbable as a snowstorm in the Sahara, but as the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction. Our research seeks to shed light on the intriguing relationship between the cerebral appeal of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the atmospheric conditions that govern the occurrence of drenching rain in the concrete jungle of New York City. In essence, we aim to unravel the enigma of how the fascination with mathematical concepts might - quite literally - make it rain.

A question that may seem puzzling at first glance is: Does the geekiness of mathematical video titles really have any bearing on the weather? Well, that's a bit like asking if a math teacher named his first two children Sine and Co-sine because his wife said to name them after his first love. For many, the idea of a correlation between YouTube titles and precipitation may seem as improbable as predicting a tornado in a teacup. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to follow the data, no matter where it leads, even if it takes us through the eye of the statistical storm.

So, join us as we embark on this whirlwind adventure, where numbers and nature collide, and where a well-crafted pun is never too far away. But remember, dear reader, to keep an open mind and a sense of humor afloat, because in the midst of scientific inquiry, a good dad joke can be a beacon of lightheartedness in the tempest of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we enter the digital age, the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to fascinate and challenge researchers across diverse disciplines. In this study, we navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, setting sail on a voyage that spans both the windswept plains of mathematics education and the stormy skies of meteorology. Our quest? To uncover the murky connection between the geeky allure of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the deluge of drenching rain in New York City.
But before we dive into this swirling maelstrom of data, let us not forget to pack our umbrellas and a hearty supply of puns. After all, a little precipitation always adds an element of surprise, much like the uncertainty inherent in statistical analysis. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of only six inches? It just proves that, in research, depth is not always what it seems!
The intersection of mathematics and meteorology may seem as improbable as a snowstorm in the Sahara, but as the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction. Our research seeks to shed light on the intriguing relationship between the cerebral appeal of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the atmospheric conditions that govern the occurrence of drenching rain in the concrete jungle of New York City. In essence, we aim to unravel the enigma of how the fascination with mathematical concepts might - quite literally - make it rain.
A question that may seem puzzling at first glance is: Does the geekiness of mathematical video titles really have any bearing on the weather? Well, that's a bit like asking if a math teacher named his first two children Sine and Co-sine because his wife said to name them after his first love. For many, the idea of a correlation between YouTube titles and precipitation may seem as improbable as predicting a tornado in a teacup. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to follow the data, no matter where it leads, even if it takes us through the eye of the statistical storm.
So, join us as we embark on this whirlwind adventure, where numbers and nature collide, and where a well-crafted pun is never too far away. But remember, dear reader, to keep an open mind and a sense of humor afloat, because in the midst of scientific inquiry, a good dad joke can be a beacon of lightheartedness in the tempest of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and drenching rain in New York City has been a topic of both intrigue and bewilderment in the realm of interdisciplinary research. Various studies have attempted to shed light on this curious association, leading us through a flurry of scholarly publications and an unexpected downpour of puns. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a preliminary correlation between the geekiness of educational video titles and meteorological phenomena, prompting further investigation into this enigmatic relationship. "Doe's research" similarly explores the impact of online educational content on weather patterns, hinting at a potential link between math education and atmospheric conditions.

As we wade deeper into the waters of interdisciplinary inquiry, it's essential to note the influence of non-fiction literature on our understanding of mathematical concepts and weather phenomena. Works such as "The Art of Mathematics" by Jerry P. King and "Weather: A Very Short Introduction" by Storm Dunlop have provided valuable insights into the intricate tapestry of numbers and nature. These texts have served as guiding stars, illuminating the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains and preparing us for the deluge of unexpected discoveries.

However, the literature also beckons us towards fiction as a source of inspiration and amusement. Books like "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "The Calculating Stars" by Mary Robinette Kowal invite us to ponder the whimsical interplay of imagination and scientific inquiry, daring us to tread lightly on the slippery slopes of speculative fiction. In the spirit of embracing unexpected connections, we are compelled to consider the role of literary works in stimulating our curiosity and, perhaps, even fueling our unrelenting pursuit of understanding the inexplicable.

Nevertheless, in the pursuit of knowledge, one mustn't overlook the unconventional sources of insight. As we navigated the turbulent seas of literature, it became apparent that unexpected discoveries can emerge from the unlikeliest of places, including the backs of shampoo bottles adorning university laboratories. These seemingly innocuous repositories of information offered a lighthearted respite from the scholarly tempest and, dare I say, a sudsy revelation or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we enter the digital age, the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to fascinate and challenge researchers across diverse disciplines. In this study, we navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, setting sail on a voyage that spans both the windswept plains of mathematics education and the stormy skies of meteorology. Our quest? To uncover the murky connection between the geeky allure of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the deluge of drenching rain in New York City.
But before we dive into this swirling maelstrom of data, let us not forget to pack our umbrellas and a hearty supply of puns. After all, a little precipitation always adds an element of surprise, much like the uncertainty inherent in statistical analysis. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of only six inches? It just proves that, in research, depth is not always what it seems!
The intersection of mathematics and meteorology may seem as improbable as a snowstorm in the Sahara, but as the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction. Our research seeks to shed light on the intriguing relationship between the cerebral appeal of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the atmospheric conditions that govern the occurrence of drenching rain in the concrete jungle of New York City. In essence, we aim to unravel the enigma of how the fascination with mathematical concepts might - quite literally - make it rain.
A question that may seem puzzling at first glance is: Does the geekiness of mathematical video titles really have any bearing on the weather? Well, that's a bit like asking if a math teacher named his first two children Sine and Co-sine because his wife said to name them after his first love. For many, the idea of a correlation between YouTube titles and precipitation may seem as improbable as predicting a tornado in a teacup. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to follow the data, no matter where it leads, even if it takes us through the eye of the statistical storm.
So, join us as we embark on this whirlwind adventure, where numbers and nature collide, and where a well-crafted pun is never too far away. But remember, dear reader, to keep an open mind and a sense of humor afloat, because in the midst of scientific inquiry, a good dad joke can be a beacon of lightheartedness in the tempest of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation into the puzzling relationship between 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and drenching rain in New York, our research team embarked on a data-gathering expedition that would make even the hardiest statisticians shiver with excitement. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to analyze the geekiness quotient of over 5,000 3Blue1Brown video titles. We employed a well-trained neural network, affectionately nicknamed "Geek-o-Meter," to ascertain the level of mathematical sophistication and intellectual allure permeating each title. This involved an intricate process of parsing algebraic expressions, differentiating puns from theorems, and integrating the essence of mathematical beauty into a quantifiable measure.

Of course, measuring geekiness is no easy task; it's akin to trying to calculate the volume of a fractal snowflake using only a ruler and a pencil. However, armed with AI algorithms and a hearty dose of perseverance, we persevered. Our Geek-o-Meter, a marvel of computational ingenuity, assigned each video title a numerical geekiness score on a scale from 1 (mildly nerdy) to 10 (intergalactically geeky). We then combed through the vast meteorological archives provided by the NOAA National Climate Data Center, focusing specifically on the historical records of drenching rain events in New York City from 2015 to 2022.

Now, you may be wondering, how exactly does one define "drenching rain"? Is it simply a heavy downpour, or does it involve a specific depth of precipitation that leaves both pedestrians and puddles thoroughly soaked? Our team carefully crafted a rigorous definition, delineating drenching rain as any rainfall exceeding 1 inch within a 24-hour period, a threshold that might be described as "umbrella-bending" rain. This precise criterion allowed us to filter through the meteorological data with the discerning eye of a rainfall connoisseur, separating the light drizzles from the deluges and the mists from the monsoons.

In our quest to establish a meaningful connection, weaving together the fabric of math and meteorology, we employed advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analysis and regression modeling. Through the magic of statistical software, we untangled the complex web of data to reveal the underlying patterns and correlations. We estimated the correlation coefficient between the geekiness scores of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the frequency of drenching rain events, unraveling a statistical tapestry that hinted at a surprising linkage between YouTube's educational allure and the capricious whims of the New York sky.

Conducting this interdisciplinary research posed its fair share of challenges and surprise plot twists. However, much like navigating through a maze of mathematical mazes, our team's resolve remained unwavering. We dove headfirst into the storm of data, armed with a passion for discovery and a penchant for puns. After all, as they say, in the tumultuous sea of research, a good dad joke is the compass that never fails to point due north.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and NOAA National Climate Data Center .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8041124, r-squared of 0.6465968, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we enter the digital age, the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to fascinate and challenge researchers across diverse disciplines. In this study, we navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, setting sail on a voyage that spans both the windswept plains of mathematics education and the stormy skies of meteorology. Our quest? To uncover the murky connection between the geeky allure of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the deluge of drenching rain in New York City.
But before we dive into this swirling maelstrom of data, let us not forget to pack our umbrellas and a hearty supply of puns. After all, a little precipitation always adds an element of surprise, much like the uncertainty inherent in statistical analysis. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of only six inches? It just proves that, in research, depth is not always what it seems!
The intersection of mathematics and meteorology may seem as improbable as a snowstorm in the Sahara, but as the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction. Our research seeks to shed light on the intriguing relationship between the cerebral appeal of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the atmospheric conditions that govern the occurrence of drenching rain in the concrete jungle of New York City. In essence, we aim to unravel the enigma of how the fascination with mathematical concepts might - quite literally - make it rain.
A question that may seem puzzling at first glance is: Does the geekiness of mathematical video titles really have any bearing on the weather? Well, that's a bit like asking if a math teacher named his first two children Sine and Co-sine because his wife said to name them after his first love. For many, the idea of a correlation between YouTube titles and precipitation may seem as improbable as predicting a tornado in a teacup. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to follow the data, no matter where it leads, even if it takes us through the eye of the statistical storm.
So, join us as we embark on this whirlwind adventure, where numbers and nature collide, and where a well-crafted pun is never too far away. But remember, dear reader, to keep an open mind and a sense of humor afloat, because in the midst of scientific inquiry, a good dad joke can be a beacon of lightheartedness in the tempest of research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the occurrence of drenching rain in New York City over the period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124, with an r-squared value of 0.6465968 and p-value less than 0.05. This robust correlation implies a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables.

Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York. The scatterplot depicts a clear upward trend, reinforcing the idea that as the geekiness of the video titles increases, so does the occurrence of drenching rain in the city that never sleeps. It seems that the more math enthusiasts tune into engaging content, the more likely New York City is to experience a downpour.

In light of these results, it appears that 3Blue1Brown videos may not only stimulate the mind but also influence atmospheric conditions. It is as if the mathematical musings of the YouTube channel wield an unseen force that impacts the weather. One might say that these findings offer a new perspective on the age-old question, "Is it raining because I'm watching math videos, or am I watching math videos because it's raining?"

This unexpected association between math-centric YouTube content and meteorological phenomena challenges traditional beliefs and beckons further investigation into the interconnectedness of diverse fields. As we ponder the implications of this correlation, perhaps we should be prepared for a new breed of precipitation forecast: a 100% chance of math-inspired showers. After all, it seems that every cloud has a silver lining – and, in this case, a bit of mathematics too.

While these results shed light on the intriguing relationship between educational YouTube content and climate events, we must tread cautiously in our interpretations. As the saying goes, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." Thus, while our statistical analysis yields compelling results, we acknowledge the need for continued scrutiny and exploration.

In summary, this study opens the door to a world of interdisciplinary inquiry, where the influence of online educational resources on environmental phenomena is not to be overlooked. The unexpected connection between 3Blue1Brown video titles and drenching rain in New York City encourages us to embrace the serendipitous nature of research and consider the myriad ways in which seemingly unrelated domains might intertwine. As we embark on further investigations, we cannot discount the humorous possibility that, indeed, "It's π-raining, Hallelujah, it's π-raining!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and drenching rain in New York City has been a topic of both intrigue and bewilderment in the realm of interdisciplinary research. Various studies have attempted to shed light on this curious association, leading us through a flurry of scholarly publications and an unexpected downpour of puns. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a preliminary correlation between the geekiness of educational video titles and meteorological phenomena, prompting further investigation into this enigmatic relationship. "Doe's research" similarly explores the impact of online educational content on weather patterns, hinting at a potential link between math education and atmospheric conditions.
As we wade deeper into the waters of interdisciplinary inquiry, it's essential to note the influence of non-fiction literature on our understanding of mathematical concepts and weather phenomena. Works such as "The Art of Mathematics" by Jerry P. King and "Weather: A Very Short Introduction" by Storm Dunlop have provided valuable insights into the intricate tapestry of numbers and nature. These texts have served as guiding stars, illuminating the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains and preparing us for the deluge of unexpected discoveries.
However, the literature also beckons us towards fiction as a source of inspiration and amusement. Books like "Cloud Atlas" by David Mitchell and "The Calculating Stars" by Mary Robinette Kowal invite us to ponder the whimsical interplay of imagination and scientific inquiry, daring us to tread lightly on the slippery slopes of speculative fiction. In the spirit of embracing unexpected connections, we are compelled to consider the role of literary works in stimulating our curiosity and, perhaps, even fueling our unrelenting pursuit of understanding the inexplicable.
Nevertheless, in the pursuit of knowledge, one mustn't overlook the unconventional sources of insight. As we navigated the turbulent seas of literature, it became apparent that unexpected discoveries can emerge from the unlikeliest of places, including the backs of shampoo bottles adorning university laboratories. These seemingly innocuous repositories of information offered a lighthearted respite from the scholarly tempest and, dare I say, a sudsy revelation or two.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the occurrence of drenching rain in New York City over the period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124, with an r-squared value of 0.6465968 and p-value less than 0.05. This robust correlation implies a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York. The scatterplot depicts a clear upward trend, reinforcing the idea that as the geekiness of the video titles increases, so does the occurrence of drenching rain in the city that never sleeps. It seems that the more math enthusiasts tune into engaging content, the more likely New York City is to experience a downpour.
In light of these results, it appears that 3Blue1Brown videos may not only stimulate the mind but also influence atmospheric conditions. It is as if the mathematical musings of the YouTube channel wield an unseen force that impacts the weather. One might say that these findings offer a new perspective on the age-old question, "Is it raining because I'm watching math videos, or am I watching math videos because it's raining?"
This unexpected association between math-centric YouTube content and meteorological phenomena challenges traditional beliefs and beckons further investigation into the interconnectedness of diverse fields. As we ponder the implications of this correlation, perhaps we should be prepared for a new breed of precipitation forecast: a 100% chance of math-inspired showers. After all, it seems that every cloud has a silver lining – and, in this case, a bit of mathematics too.
While these results shed light on the intriguing relationship between educational YouTube content and climate events, we must tread cautiously in our interpretations. As the saying goes, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." Thus, while our statistical analysis yields compelling results, we acknowledge the need for continued scrutiny and exploration.
In summary, this study opens the door to a world of interdisciplinary inquiry, where the influence of online educational resources on environmental phenomena is not to be overlooked. The unexpected connection between 3Blue1Brown video titles and drenching rain in New York City encourages us to embrace the serendipitous nature of research and consider the myriad ways in which seemingly unrelated domains might intertwine. As we embark on further investigations, we cannot discount the humorous possibility that, indeed, "It's π-raining, Hallelujah, it's π-raining!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study unveil a captivating relationship between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the prevalence of drenching rain in New York City, demonstrating a correlation that is as clear as, well, a storm cloud. Our findings align with prior research by Smith et al., solidifying the notion that the engagement with mathematical content can extend beyond stimulating the intellect to potentially influencing atmospheric phenomena. It seems that even the weather can't resist a good math pun; after all, it's "integral" to the scientific narrative.

The seemingly whimsical connection between educational online content and weather patterns takes center stage in our analysis. As we journey through the academic downpour of literature on this subject, we acknowledge the unexpected treasures hidden within the pages of seemingly unrelated texts. While we may have initially approached the topic with a fair amount of skepticism, the data has unequivocally rained on our parade, leaving us with a sobering realization that there's more to this connection than meets the eye.

Building on the works of Doe's research, we've verified and expanded upon the tentative observations of the impact of educational videos on meteorological occurrences. This serves as a testament to the snowball effect of interdisciplinary research, where even the most unexpected topics can gain traction, much like a whirlwind of statistical significance. As we traverse this uncharted terrain of interconnected scholarly domains, we must remember to keep our hypotheses grounded in empirical evidence – but a little whimsy never hurt anyone, right?

Our correlation coefficient of 0.8041124, backed by a compelling p-value, echoes the sentiment of countless dads worldwide: "Gee, that's a statistically significant relationship!" The undeniable positive correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles and drenching rain events in New York City is not something to be taken lightly. It's as if the mathematical musings of the YouTube channel have unleashed a veritable storm of influence, shaping the very fabric of weather patterns in the Big Apple.

As we dive deeper into the implications of this unexpected correlation, it becomes crucial to acknowledge the potential reverberations in forecasting and educational outreach. Could it be that mathematically-inclined content holds the key to a new era of weather prediction? In the words of every dad in a light drizzle, "It all adds up!" Our findings prompt us to reconsider the boundaries of disciplinary silos and embrace the serendipitous nature of research – after all, a little rain and a little number crunching might just lead to a shower of groundbreaking discoveries.

In our quest for understanding this peculiar connection, we must not let our skepticism dampen the lively spirit of inquiry. Rather, we should approach this enigmatic association with the curiosity of a child dazzled by their first rainbow. As we navigate the blur of statistics and weather patterns, remember that every investigation benefits from a dash of humor – it's the "lightning bolt" of creativity that sparks new ideas, after all. And so, with a twist of statistical significance and a sprinkle of mathematical marvel, we embark on the next leg of this interdisciplinary journey, hoping to unlock the secrets of this unexpected yet undeniably real connection. After all, it's not every day that we can say, "There's a 100% chance of math-inspired showers in the forecast!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and Drenching rain in New York. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.

Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we enter the digital age, the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to fascinate and challenge researchers across diverse disciplines. In this study, we navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, setting sail on a voyage that spans both the windswept plains of mathematics education and the stormy skies of meteorology. Our quest? To uncover the murky connection between the geeky allure of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the deluge of drenching rain in New York City.
But before we dive into this swirling maelstrom of data, let us not forget to pack our umbrellas and a hearty supply of puns. After all, a little precipitation always adds an element of surprise, much like the uncertainty inherent in statistical analysis. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of only six inches? It just proves that, in research, depth is not always what it seems!
The intersection of mathematics and meteorology may seem as improbable as a snowstorm in the Sahara, but as the saying goes, truth is stranger than fiction. Our research seeks to shed light on the intriguing relationship between the cerebral appeal of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the atmospheric conditions that govern the occurrence of drenching rain in the concrete jungle of New York City. In essence, we aim to unravel the enigma of how the fascination with mathematical concepts might - quite literally - make it rain.
A question that may seem puzzling at first glance is: Does the geekiness of mathematical video titles really have any bearing on the weather? Well, that's a bit like asking if a math teacher named his first two children Sine and Co-sine because his wife said to name them after his first love. For many, the idea of a correlation between YouTube titles and precipitation may seem as improbable as predicting a tornado in a teacup. Yet, as researchers, it is our duty to follow the data, no matter where it leads, even if it takes us through the eye of the statistical storm.
So, join us as we embark on this whirlwind adventure, where numbers and nature collide, and where a well-crafted pun is never too far away. But remember, dear reader, to keep an open mind and a sense of humor afloat, because in the midst of scientific inquiry, a good dad joke can be a beacon of lightheartedness in the tempest of research.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and the occurrence of drenching rain in New York City over the period from 2015 to 2022. Our findings demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124, with an r-squared value of 0.6465968 and p-value less than 0.05. This robust correlation implies a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York. The scatterplot depicts a clear upward trend, reinforcing the idea that as the geekiness of the video titles increases, so does the occurrence of drenching rain in the city that never sleeps. It seems that the more math enthusiasts tune into engaging content, the more likely New York City is to experience a downpour.
In light of these results, it appears that 3Blue1Brown videos may not only stimulate the mind but also influence atmospheric conditions. It is as if the mathematical musings of the YouTube channel wield an unseen force that impacts the weather. One might say that these findings offer a new perspective on the age-old question, "Is it raining because I'm watching math videos, or am I watching math videos because it's raining?"
This unexpected association between math-centric YouTube content and meteorological phenomena challenges traditional beliefs and beckons further investigation into the interconnectedness of diverse fields. As we ponder the implications of this correlation, perhaps we should be prepared for a new breed of precipitation forecast: a 100% chance of math-inspired showers. After all, it seems that every cloud has a silver lining – and, in this case, a bit of mathematics too.
While these results shed light on the intriguing relationship between educational YouTube content and climate events, we must tread cautiously in our interpretations. As the saying goes, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." Thus, while our statistical analysis yields compelling results, we acknowledge the need for continued scrutiny and exploration.
In summary, this study opens the door to a world of interdisciplinary inquiry, where the influence of online educational resources on environmental phenomena is not to be overlooked. The unexpected connection between 3Blue1Brown video titles and drenching rain in New York City encourages us to embrace the serendipitous nature of research and consider the myriad ways in which seemingly unrelated domains might intertwine. As we embark on further investigations, we cannot discount the humorous possibility that, indeed, "It's π-raining, Hallelujah, it's π-raining!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles and drenching rain in New York City has certainly made a splash in the realms of mathematics and meteorology. The robust correlation we uncovered may leave some scratching their heads, wondering if there's a storm of math magic brewing above the Big Apple. As researchers, we must weather the statistical downpours and brave the wacky whirlwinds of interdisciplinary inquiry, all while maintaining a sense of humor through the methodological storm.

But let's not rain on our own parade – or should we say, statistical parade? Our findings present an unexpected synergy between educational content and atmospheric events. The next time you're caught in a math-induced rainfall, just remember the wise words of a statistics professor: "It's a mean world out there, but at least we've got standard deviations!" Oh, statistics humor – it's not for everyone, but for us, it's absolute value.

While our results hint at an intriguing relationship between YouTube math videos and New York rainfall, we must recognize that correlation does not imply causation. We also acknowledge that the universe of variables affecting weather patterns is as complex as a multivariable calculus problem – without the elegance of a mathematical solution.

And so, with our umbrellas up and our data in hand, we declare that our research has unraveled a tantalizing mystery at the intersection of mathematics and meteorology. The findings stand as a beacon, urging all researchers to look for the unexpected connections that may be hiding in plain sight, much like a statistical outlier in a sea of data.

In the spirit of scientific progress and good humor, we submit that further investigation in this area may well be akin to "beating a dead horse," or perhaps we should say, "measuring the speed at which a herd of turtles can outrun a hare." Yes, in the grand scheme of inquiry, some questions might remain like Schrödinger's cat – neither answered nor unanswered – but rather in a quantum superposition of both.

Finally, we assert with reasonable certainty that no more research is needed in this area. In the words of a drenched mathematician caught in a sudden storm of equations, "I've trig-onometry had enough of this research! Let's call it a unity and move on!"

And with that, we bid adieu to the precipitation of questions swirling around this peculiar association between math YouTube videos and rainfall in the Big Apple. Let's hope this insight inspires a wave of humor-infused, interdisciplinary investigations that leave no scientific stone unturned. After all, as researchers, we must always be ready for whatever the forecast holds – be it data-driven discoveries or a pun-laden revelation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics and Atmospheric Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Mathematical Weather Patterns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Math to Meteorology: Connecting the Dots Between 3Blue1Brown YouTube Video Titles and Drenching Rain in New York with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the surprising connection between the seemingly unrelated worlds of Math education and meteorology. We explore the impact of 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles on weather patterns, particularly focusing on the occurrence of drenching rain in New York. Using AI analysis of YouTube video titles and climatological data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center, we aim to determine if there is a significant correlation between the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown content and the frequency of drenching rain events in New York City.
Our results reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8041124 with a p-value of less than 0.05 for the time span from 2015 to 2022, indicating a strong statistical association. We find that as the geekiness of 3Blue1Brown video titles increases, the incidence of drenching rain in New York also rises. This unexpected relationship prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms linking math enthusiasts' viewing habits with atmospheric conditions.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that there may be a "storm" of inspiration brewing in the correlation between educational YouTube content and climate events. However, we caution against interpreting these results too dryly, as there may be unforeseen factors at play. Nonetheless, this research opens the door to a whole new realm of interdisciplinary inquiry, and we hope it encourages others to look for unexpected connections amidst the downpour of data.

ChatGPT:

3Blue1Brown YouTube videos, Math education, meteorology, drenching rain, New York, AI analysis, YouTube video titles, climatological data, NOAA National Climate Data Center, correlation coefficient, statistical association, geekiness, educational YouTube content, climate events, interdisciplinary inquiry.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are

Drenching rain in New York
Detailed data title: Highest daily total of precipitation in the year at JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, NY US
Source: NOAA National Climate Data Center
See what else correlates with Drenching rain in New York

Correlation r = 0.8041124 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6465968 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Drenching rain in New York) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.016. 0.0161388691437459420000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 1.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 62 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are (Geeky score (out of 10))6.428677.35716.56.66.80956.85716
Drenching rain in New York (Inches of rain)2.482.92.842.162.072.333.241.38




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.4286,7,7.3571,6.5,6.6,6.8095,6.8571,6,])
array_2 = np.array([2.48,2.9,2.84,2.16,2.07,2.33,3.24,1.38,])
array_1_name = "How geeky 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Drenching rain in New York"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5281 · Black Variable ID: 25825 · Red Variable ID: 25302
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0