about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,355 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Republican voters proudly displayed their bumper stickers and flags, the sheer force of their political fervor triggered a chain reaction of car problems. It's like their support revved up some kind of mechanical marvel in the BMWs, leading to a recall bonanza. Who knew that political passion could jumpstart a whole new meaning to the term "recall election"? It's a red, white, and vroom situation that nobody saw coming!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a picturesque Texas street scene, with a clear focus on luxury BMW cars lined up on the road. The cars should be adorned with vibrant political bumper stickers and flags in support of the Presidential candidate, showcasing the fervent enthusiasm of Republican voters. Surrounding the BMWs, depict a sudden flurry of mechanical malfunctions and automotive mishaps, symbolizing the chain reaction of car problems triggered by the intense political fervor. The scene should capture the unique contrast of the red wave of political support colliding with the unexpected surge of automotive recalls, visually depicting the intriguing twist on the term "recall election." The emphasis is on creating a visually striking and thought-provoking juxtaposition of political passion and mechanical troubles within the Texas landscape. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Cyber folk Surrealism Cute cartoon Photorealism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America, in the following situation: As more Republican voters proudly displayed their bumper stickers and flags, the sheer force of their political fervor triggered a chain reaction of car problems. It's like their support revved up some kind of mechanical marvel in the BMWs, leading to a recall bonanza. Who knew that political passion could jumpstart a whole new meaning to the term "recall election"? It's a red, white, and vroom situation that nobody saw coming!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Texas, as Republican voters proudly display bumper stickers and flags supporting the Presidential candidate, BMW cars across the state seem to rev up with fervor. The sheer force of their political fervor triggers a chain reaction of car problems, leading to a sudden surge of automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It's a red wave meets a recall epidemic, creating a unique twist on the term "recall election."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In Texas, as Republican voters proudly display bumper stickers and flags supporting the Presidential candidate, BMW cars across the state seem to rev up with fervor. The sheer force of their political fervor triggers a chain reaction of car problems, leading to a sudden surge of automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It's a red wave meets a recall epidemic, creating a unique twist on the term "recall election." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a picturesque Texas street scene, with a clear focus on luxury BMW cars lined up on the road. The cars should be adorned with vibrant political bumper stickers and flags in support of the Presidential candidate, showcasing the fervent enthusiasm of Republican voters. Surrounding the BMWs, depict a sudden flurry of mechanical malfunctions and automotive mishaps, symbolizing the chain reaction of car problems triggered by the intense political fervor. The scene should capture the unique contrast of the red wave of political support colliding with the unexpected surge of automotive recalls, visually depicting the intriguing twist on the term "recall election." The emphasis is on creating a visually striking and thought-provoking juxtaposition of political passion and mechanical troubles within the Texas landscape.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas caused Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls

Journal of Political Automechanics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Political preferences and automotive safety are two seemingly unrelated domains, yet a curious correlation has emerged, prompting an investigation into the intriguing relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It is as though these two realms, one of ballots and the other of bolts, have inexplicably intertwined. One might say that this unexpected connection has provided an opportunity for researchers to rev up their analytical engines.

The idea that voting tendencies could be linked to automotive recalls may initially sound far-fetched, akin to a car running on flat tires, but the statistical analysis presented in this paper uncovers a fascinating association that cannot be dismissed lightly. The results of this study promise to pave the way for a shift in how we consider the complex interplay between political dynamics and industrial mishaps. Some may even find themselves pondering whether political choices have a subtle influence on the engineering and manufacturing of vehicles, but we shall not hastily jump to conclusions before examining the evidence.

As we delve into this unexpected correlation, we are reminded of the wise words of Henry Ford: "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." In this case, it appears that political votes and automotive recalls have indeed "come together" in a surprising manner, prompting an exploration of a relationship that has long been overlooked. It is as if they have engaged in a peculiar dance, much like a "political tango," where every step taken by voters seemingly corresponds with a misstep in the automotive industry.

This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the statistical evidence that substantiates the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It will also serve as a reminder that, much like a well-tuned engine, the political and industrial landscapes are intricately connected and must be examined holistically. The findings presented here are not intended to ignite a fiery debate, but rather to spark a deeper interest in the intersections of politics and engineering, and to steer the discourse toward a more nuanced understanding of society's interconnected complexities.

As we embark on this journey of exploration and analysis, we are reminded that sometimes, unexpected relationships and correlations can drive our understanding of the world in meaningful ways. It is in the spirit of scholarly inquiry and intellectual curiosity that we present the findings of this research, and invite the reader to join us as we navigate the unique terrain where political preferences and automotive safety converge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Political preferences and automotive safety are two seemingly unrelated domains, yet a curious correlation has emerged, prompting an investigation into the intriguing relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It is as though these two realms, one of ballots and the other of bolts, have inexplicably intertwined. One might say that this unexpected connection has provided an opportunity for researchers to rev up their analytical engines.
The idea that voting tendencies could be linked to automotive recalls may initially sound far-fetched, akin to a car running on flat tires, but the statistical analysis presented in this paper uncovers a fascinating association that cannot be dismissed lightly. The results of this study promise to pave the way for a shift in how we consider the complex interplay between political dynamics and industrial mishaps. Some may even find themselves pondering whether political choices have a subtle influence on the engineering and manufacturing of vehicles, but we shall not hastily jump to conclusions before examining the evidence.
As we delve into this unexpected correlation, we are reminded of the wise words of Henry Ford: "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." In this case, it appears that political votes and automotive recalls have indeed "come together" in a surprising manner, prompting an exploration of a relationship that has long been overlooked. It is as if they have engaged in a peculiar dance, much like a "political tango," where every step taken by voters seemingly corresponds with a misstep in the automotive industry.
This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the statistical evidence that substantiates the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It will also serve as a reminder that, much like a well-tuned engine, the political and industrial landscapes are intricately connected and must be examined holistically. The findings presented here are not intended to ignite a fiery debate, but rather to spark a deeper interest in the intersections of politics and engineering, and to steer the discourse toward a more nuanced understanding of society's interconnected complexities.
As we embark on this journey of exploration and analysis, we are reminded that sometimes, unexpected relationships and correlations can drive our understanding of the world in meaningful ways. It is in the spirit of scholarly inquiry and intellectual curiosity that we present the findings of this research, and invite the reader to join us as we navigate the unique terrain where political preferences and automotive safety converge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al." the authors find a substantive negative correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. This surprising association challenges conventional understanding and calls for further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms.

As we ponder this unexpected relationship, let's not "tire" ourselves out with hasty conclusions. Instead, let's "wheel" in some additional perspectives.

In "Doe's study," the authors draw attention to the possible influence of political ideology on consumer behavior, which may extend to the automotive industry. This raises thought-provoking questions regarding the role of political preferences in shaping the demand for certain automotive brands and the subsequent quality control measures implemented by manufacturers.

It seems that, much like a well-timed punchline, this peculiar correlation leaves us wanting to dig deeper. It's almost as if we're navigating uncharted territory, like a car with a faulty GPS system. Speaking of which, did you hear about the car that got a flat tire? It was "treadful."

Turning to some non-fiction books related to the topic, "Dr. Jane Smith's The Politics of Cars" provides an insightful exploration of the intersection between political ideologies and consumer choices, shedding light on how these dynamics could permeate the automotive industry.

Moreover, "John Doe's Wheels of Change" delves into the societal impact of automotive manufacturing and how it intertwines with political landscapes. Both books offer valuable perspectives that complement the statistical evidence presented in this research.

Now, let's veer into the realm of fiction for a moment. "The Recalled Candidate" by Sarah Jones presents a satirical take on a presidential candidate whose campaign is plagued by automotive recalls, offering a humorous yet oddly relevant perspective on the subject matter.

"Red, White, and BMW" by Tom Smithson takes readers on a suspenseful journey through political intrigue and automotive scandals, blending elements of conspiracy and automotive drama into a compelling narrative that seems oddly familiar in light of our research findings.

Finally, let's not overlook the insightful musings of social media. A tweet from @CarEnthusiast99 proclaims, "Seems like political votes and automotive recalls have aligned more than we thought! Maybe the 'red' states have a thing for 'red' cars after all?" Such social media posts capture the public's growing awareness of the unexpected connections between political leanings and automotive phenomena.

In summary, the literature reviewed reveals a growing interest in the intersection of political dynamics and automotive industry trends, demonstrating the need for a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the complex interplay between the two domains. It is in this spirit of academic inquiry and good-natured humor that the present study seeks to contribute to the evolving discourse on this unconventional yet intriguing relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Political preferences and automotive safety are two seemingly unrelated domains, yet a curious correlation has emerged, prompting an investigation into the intriguing relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It is as though these two realms, one of ballots and the other of bolts, have inexplicably intertwined. One might say that this unexpected connection has provided an opportunity for researchers to rev up their analytical engines.
The idea that voting tendencies could be linked to automotive recalls may initially sound far-fetched, akin to a car running on flat tires, but the statistical analysis presented in this paper uncovers a fascinating association that cannot be dismissed lightly. The results of this study promise to pave the way for a shift in how we consider the complex interplay between political dynamics and industrial mishaps. Some may even find themselves pondering whether political choices have a subtle influence on the engineering and manufacturing of vehicles, but we shall not hastily jump to conclusions before examining the evidence.
As we delve into this unexpected correlation, we are reminded of the wise words of Henry Ford: "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." In this case, it appears that political votes and automotive recalls have indeed "come together" in a surprising manner, prompting an exploration of a relationship that has long been overlooked. It is as if they have engaged in a peculiar dance, much like a "political tango," where every step taken by voters seemingly corresponds with a misstep in the automotive industry.
This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the statistical evidence that substantiates the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It will also serve as a reminder that, much like a well-tuned engine, the political and industrial landscapes are intricately connected and must be examined holistically. The findings presented here are not intended to ignite a fiery debate, but rather to spark a deeper interest in the intersections of politics and engineering, and to steer the discourse toward a more nuanced understanding of society's interconnected complexities.
As we embark on this journey of exploration and analysis, we are reminded that sometimes, unexpected relationships and correlations can drive our understanding of the world in meaningful ways. It is in the spirit of scholarly inquiry and intellectual curiosity that we present the findings of this research, and invite the reader to join us as we navigate the unique terrain where political preferences and automotive safety converge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The data used in this study were obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, covering the period from 1976 to 2020. The data sources were selected based on their comprehensive and reliable records of votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Data on automotive recalls were gathered by identifying all relevant recalls issued by BMW of North America and associating them with the corresponding time periods.

To begin with, we meticulously combed through the MIT Election Data and Science Lab database, deftly navigating through the labyrinth of political data much like a mechanic troubleshooting an elusive car problem. We then cross-referenced this information with the GPS-like precision of the Harvard Dataverse to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the political voting patterns in Texas. This approach allowed us to map out the subtle nuances and shifts in political preferences over the years, akin to adjusting the steering wheel on a winding road.

Next, we steered our focus toward the US DOT data to sieve through the comprehensive records of BMW of North America's recalls. This was akin to scrutinizing the history of automotive hiccups with the acumen of a seasoned mechanic, looking for patterns and anomalies in the recall landscape. Our intention was to navigate through the vast sea of automotive recalls with the precision of a well-tuned GPS, guiding us toward the specific recalls linked to BMW of North America within the given timeframe.

Furthermore, in order to establish a robust connection between the GOP votes and BMW recalls, we utilized statistical analyses, employing correlation coefficients and p-values to identify the strength and significance of the relationship between the two variables. The correlation coefficient, akin to the alignment of wheels on a vehicle, allowed us to quantify the magnitude and direction of the relationship, while the p-value, much like a fuel efficiency rating, indicated the statistical significance of the observed correlation.

Interpreting the statistical findings involved careful examination of the data, much like diagnosing an intricate mechanical issue. At times, it meant sifting through the numbers to identify any anomalous readings, akin to troubleshooting a perplexing automotive malfunction. Additionally, robust sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the reliability and consistency of the statistical relationship, avoiding potential potholes in the interpretation process.

Amidst the analytical undertakings, we maintained a keen awareness of the limitations and potential biases inherent in the data sources and statistical methods, much like a driver navigating through challenging road conditions. This approach enabled us to steer clear of the pitfalls and detours that could lead to erroneous conclusions, fostering a level of confidence in the results akin to a smooth ride on the open road.

It is important to note that any potential jokes made in this paper are not indicative of a lack of seriousness in our research. In fact, we believe the occasional pun adds a spark of levity to the sometimes dry nature of academic literature. Just as a well-timed joke can lighten the mood in a tense situation, we hope that the occasional humorous interjection may offer a welcome reprieve to readers navigating through the intricacies of our rigorous methodology and findings. After all, as automotive and political enthusiasts alike would agree, sometimes a bit of lightheartedness can oil the gears of scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9261209, r-squared of 0.8576998, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Political preferences and automotive safety are two seemingly unrelated domains, yet a curious correlation has emerged, prompting an investigation into the intriguing relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It is as though these two realms, one of ballots and the other of bolts, have inexplicably intertwined. One might say that this unexpected connection has provided an opportunity for researchers to rev up their analytical engines.
The idea that voting tendencies could be linked to automotive recalls may initially sound far-fetched, akin to a car running on flat tires, but the statistical analysis presented in this paper uncovers a fascinating association that cannot be dismissed lightly. The results of this study promise to pave the way for a shift in how we consider the complex interplay between political dynamics and industrial mishaps. Some may even find themselves pondering whether political choices have a subtle influence on the engineering and manufacturing of vehicles, but we shall not hastily jump to conclusions before examining the evidence.
As we delve into this unexpected correlation, we are reminded of the wise words of Henry Ford: "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." In this case, it appears that political votes and automotive recalls have indeed "come together" in a surprising manner, prompting an exploration of a relationship that has long been overlooked. It is as if they have engaged in a peculiar dance, much like a "political tango," where every step taken by voters seemingly corresponds with a misstep in the automotive industry.
This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the statistical evidence that substantiates the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It will also serve as a reminder that, much like a well-tuned engine, the political and industrial landscapes are intricately connected and must be examined holistically. The findings presented here are not intended to ignite a fiery debate, but rather to spark a deeper interest in the intersections of politics and engineering, and to steer the discourse toward a more nuanced understanding of society's interconnected complexities.
As we embark on this journey of exploration and analysis, we are reminded that sometimes, unexpected relationships and correlations can drive our understanding of the world in meaningful ways. It is in the spirit of scholarly inquiry and intellectual curiosity that we present the findings of this research, and invite the reader to join us as we navigate the unique terrain where political preferences and automotive safety converge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a notably strong positive correlation of 0.9261209 between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America over the time period of 1976 to 2020, with an r-squared value of 0.8576998 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that there is a high degree of association between these two variables. One might say that the political and automotive spheres have cruised along the same road for quite some time, perhaps even carpooling in the realm of statistical significance.

Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot, providing a visual representation of the robust correlation identified. The graph showcases a seemingly synchronized pattern between the number of votes for the Republican candidate and the frequency of automotive recalls, akin to a well-coordinated dance between elephants and Hummers – not something you'd expect, but certainly hard to ignore once you see it.

The compelling results of this research suggest that there may be more at play than mere coincidence in the relationship between political voting patterns in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It beckons scholars and industry experts alike to ponder the underlying mechanisms that could give rise to such a striking statistical relationship, much like an unexpected detour on the road to understanding societal phenomena.

The statistical evidence presented here serves as a substantive contribution to the broader understanding of the unexpected connections that can exist between seemingly disparate domains. This study, while lighthearted at times, steers us toward a richer appreciation of the intricate interplay between political inclinations and automotive industry occurrences, challenging traditional assumptions and inviting further scholarly investigation. After all, in the world of research, as in driving, one should always keep an open mind for unexpected turns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al." the authors find a substantive negative correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. This surprising association challenges conventional understanding and calls for further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms.
As we ponder this unexpected relationship, let's not "tire" ourselves out with hasty conclusions. Instead, let's "wheel" in some additional perspectives.
In "Doe's study," the authors draw attention to the possible influence of political ideology on consumer behavior, which may extend to the automotive industry. This raises thought-provoking questions regarding the role of political preferences in shaping the demand for certain automotive brands and the subsequent quality control measures implemented by manufacturers.
It seems that, much like a well-timed punchline, this peculiar correlation leaves us wanting to dig deeper. It's almost as if we're navigating uncharted territory, like a car with a faulty GPS system. Speaking of which, did you hear about the car that got a flat tire? It was "treadful."
Turning to some non-fiction books related to the topic, "Dr. Jane Smith's The Politics of Cars" provides an insightful exploration of the intersection between political ideologies and consumer choices, shedding light on how these dynamics could permeate the automotive industry.
Moreover, "John Doe's Wheels of Change" delves into the societal impact of automotive manufacturing and how it intertwines with political landscapes. Both books offer valuable perspectives that complement the statistical evidence presented in this research.
Now, let's veer into the realm of fiction for a moment. "The Recalled Candidate" by Sarah Jones presents a satirical take on a presidential candidate whose campaign is plagued by automotive recalls, offering a humorous yet oddly relevant perspective on the subject matter.
"Red, White, and BMW" by Tom Smithson takes readers on a suspenseful journey through political intrigue and automotive scandals, blending elements of conspiracy and automotive drama into a compelling narrative that seems oddly familiar in light of our research findings.
Finally, let's not overlook the insightful musings of social media. A tweet from @CarEnthusiast99 proclaims, "Seems like political votes and automotive recalls have aligned more than we thought! Maybe the 'red' states have a thing for 'red' cars after all?" Such social media posts capture the public's growing awareness of the unexpected connections between political leanings and automotive phenomena.
In summary, the literature reviewed reveals a growing interest in the intersection of political dynamics and automotive industry trends, demonstrating the need for a multidisciplinary approach to understanding the complex interplay between the two domains. It is in this spirit of academic inquiry and good-natured humor that the present study seeks to contribute to the evolving discourse on this unconventional yet intriguing relationship.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notably strong positive correlation of 0.9261209 between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America over the time period of 1976 to 2020, with an r-squared value of 0.8576998 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that there is a high degree of association between these two variables. One might say that the political and automotive spheres have cruised along the same road for quite some time, perhaps even carpooling in the realm of statistical significance.
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot, providing a visual representation of the robust correlation identified. The graph showcases a seemingly synchronized pattern between the number of votes for the Republican candidate and the frequency of automotive recalls, akin to a well-coordinated dance between elephants and Hummers – not something you'd expect, but certainly hard to ignore once you see it.
The compelling results of this research suggest that there may be more at play than mere coincidence in the relationship between political voting patterns in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It beckons scholars and industry experts alike to ponder the underlying mechanisms that could give rise to such a striking statistical relationship, much like an unexpected detour on the road to understanding societal phenomena.
The statistical evidence presented here serves as a substantive contribution to the broader understanding of the unexpected connections that can exist between seemingly disparate domains. This study, while lighthearted at times, steers us toward a richer appreciation of the intricate interplay between political inclinations and automotive industry occurrences, challenging traditional assumptions and inviting further scholarly investigation. After all, in the world of research, as in driving, one should always keep an open mind for unexpected turns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study shed light on the remarkable association between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. The notable positive correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 lends statistical weight to the peculiar relationship, affirming the prior research that hinted at a surprising connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps. It seems that these variables, much like a well-timed dad joke, have elicited an unexpected collective chuckle from statisticians and automotive enthusiasts alike.

The discerned correlation serves as a testament to the intricate web of interactions that underpin seemingly unrelated societal phenomena, not unlike a multilane highway where unexpected mergers occur. The statistical evidence herein aligns with and reinforces the earlier study by Smith et al., providing further support for the substantial influence of political voting patterns on the occurrence of automotive recalls. It's as if the political landscape, much like a vehicular navigation system, has steered the automotive industry down unexplored avenues – to the surprise of many, but not without leaving a trace of statistical breadcrumbs.

These results beckon us to contemplate the underlying mechanisms at play, just as one might ponder the mysterious workings of an engine that won't start on a cold morning. The statistical association observed hints at a coalescence between consumer behavior shaped by political ideologies and the quality control processes within the automotive industry, akin to a smoothly coordinated dance between policymakers and carmakers – a performance that, despite its statistical elegance, may baffle and entertain in equal measure, much like a balancing act on a unicycle.

The present research stands as a reminder of the often serendipitous nature of interdisciplinary inquiry, revealing unexpected correlations that extend beyond the confines of traditional academic discourse. It is in the spirit of scholarly humor and analytical rigor that we present these findings, not to drive a wedge between partisan beliefs, but to rev our intellectual engines in pursuit of a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate connections that govern our societal landscape. After all, as in life and research, the most unexpected relationships can lead to the most enlightening revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas and Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Political preferences and automotive safety are two seemingly unrelated domains, yet a curious correlation has emerged, prompting an investigation into the intriguing relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It is as though these two realms, one of ballots and the other of bolts, have inexplicably intertwined. One might say that this unexpected connection has provided an opportunity for researchers to rev up their analytical engines.
The idea that voting tendencies could be linked to automotive recalls may initially sound far-fetched, akin to a car running on flat tires, but the statistical analysis presented in this paper uncovers a fascinating association that cannot be dismissed lightly. The results of this study promise to pave the way for a shift in how we consider the complex interplay between political dynamics and industrial mishaps. Some may even find themselves pondering whether political choices have a subtle influence on the engineering and manufacturing of vehicles, but we shall not hastily jump to conclusions before examining the evidence.
As we delve into this unexpected correlation, we are reminded of the wise words of Henry Ford: "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success." In this case, it appears that political votes and automotive recalls have indeed "come together" in a surprising manner, prompting an exploration of a relationship that has long been overlooked. It is as if they have engaged in a peculiar dance, much like a "political tango," where every step taken by voters seemingly corresponds with a misstep in the automotive industry.
This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the statistical evidence that substantiates the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It will also serve as a reminder that, much like a well-tuned engine, the political and industrial landscapes are intricately connected and must be examined holistically. The findings presented here are not intended to ignite a fiery debate, but rather to spark a deeper interest in the intersections of politics and engineering, and to steer the discourse toward a more nuanced understanding of society's interconnected complexities.
As we embark on this journey of exploration and analysis, we are reminded that sometimes, unexpected relationships and correlations can drive our understanding of the world in meaningful ways. It is in the spirit of scholarly inquiry and intellectual curiosity that we present the findings of this research, and invite the reader to join us as we navigate the unique terrain where political preferences and automotive safety converge.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notably strong positive correlation of 0.9261209 between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America over the time period of 1976 to 2020, with an r-squared value of 0.8576998 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that there is a high degree of association between these two variables. One might say that the political and automotive spheres have cruised along the same road for quite some time, perhaps even carpooling in the realm of statistical significance.
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot, providing a visual representation of the robust correlation identified. The graph showcases a seemingly synchronized pattern between the number of votes for the Republican candidate and the frequency of automotive recalls, akin to a well-coordinated dance between elephants and Hummers – not something you'd expect, but certainly hard to ignore once you see it.
The compelling results of this research suggest that there may be more at play than mere coincidence in the relationship between political voting patterns in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. It beckons scholars and industry experts alike to ponder the underlying mechanisms that could give rise to such a striking statistical relationship, much like an unexpected detour on the road to understanding societal phenomena.
The statistical evidence presented here serves as a substantive contribution to the broader understanding of the unexpected connections that can exist between seemingly disparate domains. This study, while lighthearted at times, steers us toward a richer appreciation of the intricate interplay between political inclinations and automotive industry occurrences, challenging traditional assumptions and inviting further scholarly investigation. After all, in the world of research, as in driving, one should always keep an open mind for unexpected turns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of this study provide compelling evidence for the surprising association between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and a p-value of less than 0.01 highlight the substantial link between these seemingly unrelated domains, akin to discovering a hybrid vehicle that runs on political debates.

These findings demonstrate that the interplay between political preferences and automotive safety is not merely a fluke, but rather a statistically significant phenomenon that warrants further investigation. It's as if political leanings have inexplicably turned into road signs for potential automotive hiccups, leading one to wonder if vehicles come equipped with a "political preference detector."

The visual representation of the correlation, akin to a synchronized dance between elephants and Hummers, emphasizes the unexpected nature of this relationship. It's almost as perplexing as a car with square wheels – a real "political wheelie," if you will. This statistical connection challenges traditional assumptions and reinforces the need to consider the intricate web of societal factors that contribute to industrial occurrences, much like a complex car engine that requires thorough examination.

Thus, it is evident that investigating the links between voting patterns and automotive industry developments has the potential to drive our understanding of societal complexities in unanticipated ways. As Confucius once said, "Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated" – and it seems that includes the entwined worlds of politics and automotive engineering.

In light of these findings, it can be confidently stated that further research in this area is unnecessary. The evidence presented is as convincing as a freewheeling sedan on a straight road, and additional studies would simply be spinning the wheels without moving the vehicle forward. The unexpected connection between political votes and automotive recalls has been thoroughly examined, leaving no horsepower for doubt about the substantial correlation uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Political Automechanics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Advancements in Political Vehicular Research (IAPVR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Republi-Car Recalls: A Political and Automotive Analysis of the Relationship Between Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Texas and BMW of North America's Recalls with an abstract of This research paper delves into the peculiar connection between political leanings and automotive mishaps by exploring the correlation between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Texas and automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and US DOT, a correlation coefficient of 0.9261209 and p < 0.01 was identified for the time period spanning from 1976 to 2020. This paper provides the statistical evidence for the surprising relationship, affirming the notion that there may be more to voting patterns and automotive industry woes than meets the eye. One might say that this study steers us toward the intersection of political engagement and automotive reliability. We present the findings not to fuel partisan debates, but to shift gears in examining the peculiar correlations that exist in our society.

ChatGPT:

"Republican presidential candidate Texas votes correlation BMW North America recalls," "political voting patterns automotive industry recalls correlation," "MIT Election Data Science Lab Texas presidential votes BMW North America recalls," "US DOT automotive recalls Republican voting patterns correlation," "relationship between political leanings and automotive mishaps"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas

Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by BMW of North America
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America

Correlation r = 0.9261209 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8576998 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-5. 0.0000152974594657759050000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 65,370 random variables You don't actually need 65 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas (Total votes)195330025107003433430303683024960702736170379964045269204479330456984046850505890350
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America (Recalls)313352111716151736




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1953300,2510700,3433430,3036830,2496070,2736170,3799640,4526920,4479330,4569840,4685050,5890350,])
array_2 = np.array([3,1,3,3,5,2,11,17,16,15,17,36,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5355 · Black Variable ID: 26035 · Red Variable ID: 1121
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0