about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,357 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin and the second variable is Number of websites on the internet.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Libertarian-leaning individuals were elected, they advocated for less government regulation, including in the tech industry. This led to a surge in internet startups and a proliferation of niche websites dedicated to everything from homemade cheese curds to the art of dairy farming. With a freer internet landscape, Wisconsinites embraced their newfound online presence, creating a virtual cheese paradise and sparking a digital revolution in America's Dairyland.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image inspired by a Skyrim scene, set in a picturesque Wisconsin landscape, where the internet presence is thriving due to less regulation, with cheese-themed websites and a celebration of the virtual cheese paradise. The image should capture the fusion of Skyrim's fantasy atmosphere with the technological and agricultural elements of Wisconsin's virtual cheese paradise. The scene should evoke a sense of freedom, creativity, and abundance, reflecting the surge in internet startups and the celebration of Wisconsin's dairy culture. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic a funny image macro Steampunk Psychedelic A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet, in the following situation: As more Libertarian-leaning individuals were elected, they advocated for less government regulation, including in the tech industry. This led to a surge in internet startups and a proliferation of niche websites dedicated to everything from homemade cheese curds to the art of dairy farming. With a freer internet landscape, Wisconsinites embraced their newfound online presence, creating a virtual cheese paradise and sparking a digital revolution in America's Dairyland.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wisconsin, the number of websites on the internet soared as Libertarian senators pushed for less regulation, leading to a surge in internet startups. Wisconsinites celebrated their virtual cheese paradise, with websites showcasing everything from homemade cheese curds to the art of dairy farming.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In Wisconsin, the number of websites on the internet soared as Libertarian senators pushed for less regulation, leading to a surge in internet startups. Wisconsinites celebrated their virtual cheese paradise, with websites showcasing everything from homemade cheese curds to the art of dairy farming. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image inspired by a Skyrim scene, set in a picturesque Wisconsin landscape, where the internet presence is thriving due to less regulation, with cheese-themed websites and a celebration of the virtual cheese paradise. The image should capture the fusion of Skyrim's fantasy atmosphere with the technological and agricultural elements of Wisconsin's virtual cheese paradise. The scene should evoke a sense of freedom, creativity, and abundance, reflecting the surge in internet startups and the celebration of Wisconsin's dairy culture.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin caused Number of websites on the internet to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

The Journal of Technological Policy and Electoral Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2016.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of modern political analysis, understanding the factors that influence voting behavior is of paramount importance. The advent of the digital age has introduced a new and fascinating dimension to this inquiry, as the interconnected web of cyber activity has the potential to sway political preferences in unforeseen ways. As we delve into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, we embark on a journey to untangle the intricate strands of online presence and political ideology.

The construct of libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual liberty and limited government intervention, has garnered a dedicated following, particularly in the Badger State. Wisconsin, renowned for its cheese, football, and political paradoxes, provides an intriguing backdrop for exploring the interplay between digital connectivity and political allegiance. Through rigorous analysis of data spanning a quarter-century, our study uncovers a correlation that may reveal underlying patterns in the cyber and political domains.

The association between the cyber realm and political behavior is still relatively nascent in the annals of academic research. However, with the proliferation of online platforms and the increasing digitization of social interaction, it is imperative to examine the potential influence of the digital world on democratic decision-making. In this spirit of inquiry, our investigation aims to shed light on the nuanced dynamics of cyber engagement and political affiliations, all while surfacing innovative insights through statistical analysis and methodological rigor.

With this backdrop, we invite you to join us in this journey through the virtual corridors of the internet and the ballot box, as we seek to answer the intriguing question: can webs unravel votes? This inquiry promises to offer a fresh perspective on the evolving landscape of political engagement, with the potential to expand the scope of electoral research and illuminate unexpected connections between the cyber and political domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of modern political analysis, understanding the factors that influence voting behavior is of paramount importance. The advent of the digital age has introduced a new and fascinating dimension to this inquiry, as the interconnected web of cyber activity has the potential to sway political preferences in unforeseen ways. As we delve into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, we embark on a journey to untangle the intricate strands of online presence and political ideology.
The construct of libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual liberty and limited government intervention, has garnered a dedicated following, particularly in the Badger State. Wisconsin, renowned for its cheese, football, and political paradoxes, provides an intriguing backdrop for exploring the interplay between digital connectivity and political allegiance. Through rigorous analysis of data spanning a quarter-century, our study uncovers a correlation that may reveal underlying patterns in the cyber and political domains.
The association between the cyber realm and political behavior is still relatively nascent in the annals of academic research. However, with the proliferation of online platforms and the increasing digitization of social interaction, it is imperative to examine the potential influence of the digital world on democratic decision-making. In this spirit of inquiry, our investigation aims to shed light on the nuanced dynamics of cyber engagement and political affiliations, all while surfacing innovative insights through statistical analysis and methodological rigor.
With this backdrop, we invite you to join us in this journey through the virtual corridors of the internet and the ballot box, as we seek to answer the intriguing question: can webs unravel votes? This inquiry promises to offer a fresh perspective on the evolving landscape of political engagement, with the potential to expand the scope of electoral research and illuminate unexpected connections between the cyber and political domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In examining the intersection of cyber connectivity and political allegiance, it is imperative to survey the existing literature that sheds light on this unique relationship. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a seminal study on the correlation between internet usage and political leanings, finding a positive association between online activity and libertarian-minded individuals. Similarly, Doe (2012) explored the impact of digital media on voter behavior, revealing intriguing patterns in the online engagement of politically independent citizens. Moreover, Jones (2018) delved into the societal implications of web proliferation, offering insights into the potential influence of the internet on diverse spheres of human activity.

Delving into the realm of non-fiction, the works of "The Filter Bubble" by Eli Pariser and "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains" by Nicholas Carr provide thought-provoking perspectives on the impact of digital technology on human cognition and social interaction. These scholarly analyses offer valuable insights into the nuanced dynamics of online engagement and its potential repercussions on individual and collective decision-making processes.

Moving beyond non-fiction, the realms of fiction also offer intriguing narratives that explore the interplay between technology and human behavior. From George Orwell's "1984" to Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World," dystopian visions of technological control and societal manipulation highlight the perennial tension between individual autonomy and the omnipresence of digital connectivity. These literary works, while fictional in nature, present compelling allegories that invite contemplation on the intricate fabric of human agency and technological influence.

Turning to unconventional sources, a thorough exploration of the internet landscape includes an unconventional repository of knowledge: the ubiquitous CVS receipts. While not traditionally considered a scholarly source, the abundance of information contained within these daily artifacts offers a whimsical yet unexpectedly insightful lens through which to discern the varied facets of modern consumerism and, by extension, the digital interconnectedness that shapes contemporary socio-political landscapes.

As we meander through the labyrinth of scholarly inquiry and literary imagination, our journey to elucidate the entwined narratives of online presence and political preference embarks on a decidedly offbeat trajectory, unveiling unexpected avenues of contemplation and scholarly mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats . You used data from 1991 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of modern political analysis, understanding the factors that influence voting behavior is of paramount importance. The advent of the digital age has introduced a new and fascinating dimension to this inquiry, as the interconnected web of cyber activity has the potential to sway political preferences in unforeseen ways. As we delve into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, we embark on a journey to untangle the intricate strands of online presence and political ideology.
The construct of libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual liberty and limited government intervention, has garnered a dedicated following, particularly in the Badger State. Wisconsin, renowned for its cheese, football, and political paradoxes, provides an intriguing backdrop for exploring the interplay between digital connectivity and political allegiance. Through rigorous analysis of data spanning a quarter-century, our study uncovers a correlation that may reveal underlying patterns in the cyber and political domains.
The association between the cyber realm and political behavior is still relatively nascent in the annals of academic research. However, with the proliferation of online platforms and the increasing digitization of social interaction, it is imperative to examine the potential influence of the digital world on democratic decision-making. In this spirit of inquiry, our investigation aims to shed light on the nuanced dynamics of cyber engagement and political affiliations, all while surfacing innovative insights through statistical analysis and methodological rigor.
With this backdrop, we invite you to join us in this journey through the virtual corridors of the internet and the ballot box, as we seek to answer the intriguing question: can webs unravel votes? This inquiry promises to offer a fresh perspective on the evolving landscape of political engagement, with the potential to expand the scope of electoral research and illuminate unexpected connections between the cyber and political domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the web of association between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, a comprehensive research methodology was employed. Data spanning the years 1991 to 2016 was utilized from reputable sources including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats. The selection of these data sources was based on their credibility and extensive coverage of the variables of interest.

In order to conduct our analysis, we adopted a multifaceted approach that combined quantitative analysis with a touch of technological intrigue. Firstly, the number of websites on the internet was meticulously tracked and collated from the rich troves of digitized data, utilizing web crawling algorithms and spiders as our digital companions in this quest. The allure of exploring the expansive digital expanse was matched only by the copious amounts of caffeine required to fuel our techno-odyssey.

Simultaneously, the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin were scrutinized with statistical precision, drawing from official election records and mindful of the wily nature of political sentiment. Our investigative team spared no effort in deciphering the intricate electoral data, employing statistical tools to pry open the Pandora’s box of political preference.

To explore potential relationships between these datasets, we employed a range of statistical techniques, including but not limited to correlation analysis, regression models, and time series analysis. Our statistical arsenal was polished and ready, as we endeavored to navigate the labyrinthine pathways of data, ever vigilant for the serendipitous discoveries that often materialize when researchers least expect them.

Furthermore, our exploration of the refined association between cyber activity and political preferences was informed by established theoretical frameworks from political science, sociology, and information technology, enhancing the depth and scope of our analysis. We also accounted for potential confounding variables, gingerly teasing apart the intertwined strands of web and vote, to ensure the robustness and validity of our findings.

In sum, our methodology was underpinned by meticulous attention to detail, multi-disciplinary insights, and a dash of cybernetic dexterity, enabling us to shed light on the intriguing link between online presence and political behavior in the realm of senatorial votes. Join us as we embark on this intellectual journey, reminiscent of exploring the online catacombs, to discern whether webs, both digital and ideological, can indeed unravel votes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats .

For the time period 1991 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.9853660, r-squared of 0.9709462, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of modern political analysis, understanding the factors that influence voting behavior is of paramount importance. The advent of the digital age has introduced a new and fascinating dimension to this inquiry, as the interconnected web of cyber activity has the potential to sway political preferences in unforeseen ways. As we delve into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, we embark on a journey to untangle the intricate strands of online presence and political ideology.
The construct of libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual liberty and limited government intervention, has garnered a dedicated following, particularly in the Badger State. Wisconsin, renowned for its cheese, football, and political paradoxes, provides an intriguing backdrop for exploring the interplay between digital connectivity and political allegiance. Through rigorous analysis of data spanning a quarter-century, our study uncovers a correlation that may reveal underlying patterns in the cyber and political domains.
The association between the cyber realm and political behavior is still relatively nascent in the annals of academic research. However, with the proliferation of online platforms and the increasing digitization of social interaction, it is imperative to examine the potential influence of the digital world on democratic decision-making. In this spirit of inquiry, our investigation aims to shed light on the nuanced dynamics of cyber engagement and political affiliations, all while surfacing innovative insights through statistical analysis and methodological rigor.
With this backdrop, we invite you to join us in this journey through the virtual corridors of the internet and the ballot box, as we seek to answer the intriguing question: can webs unravel votes? This inquiry promises to offer a fresh perspective on the evolving landscape of political engagement, with the potential to expand the scope of electoral research and illuminate unexpected connections between the cyber and political domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin over the period 1991 to 2016. The correlation, which was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9709462 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggests a robust and highly significant relationship between these two variables.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of websites and libertarian votes. The data points appear to be tightly clustered around a clear upward trend, indicating that as the number of websites increases, so do the libertarian votes.

This noteworthy relationship prompts an intriguing line of inquiry into the potential influence of the digital world on political preferences, particularly in the context of libertarian-leaning electorate in Wisconsin. The strength of the correlation underscores the need to further explore the mechanisms through which online presence may shape individuals' political inclinations, offering a new perspective on the interplay between cyber activity and voting behavior.

The statistical findings provide compelling evidence of a profound association between the virtual terrain of the internet and the realm of political decision-making. While the precise mechanisms driving this correlation remain open to interpretation, the results of this study highlight the need for continued exploration of the complex interdependence between cyber engagement and political ideology.

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin. These findings expand the scope of inquiry into the potential impact of digital connectivity on political behavior, paving the way for further investigation into the intricate dynamics of online presence and voting preferences. It seems that in the digital age, web surfing may have taken on a whole new political dimension.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In examining the intersection of cyber connectivity and political allegiance, it is imperative to survey the existing literature that sheds light on this unique relationship. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a seminal study on the correlation between internet usage and political leanings, finding a positive association between online activity and libertarian-minded individuals. Similarly, Doe (2012) explored the impact of digital media on voter behavior, revealing intriguing patterns in the online engagement of politically independent citizens. Moreover, Jones (2018) delved into the societal implications of web proliferation, offering insights into the potential influence of the internet on diverse spheres of human activity.
Delving into the realm of non-fiction, the works of "The Filter Bubble" by Eli Pariser and "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains" by Nicholas Carr provide thought-provoking perspectives on the impact of digital technology on human cognition and social interaction. These scholarly analyses offer valuable insights into the nuanced dynamics of online engagement and its potential repercussions on individual and collective decision-making processes.
Moving beyond non-fiction, the realms of fiction also offer intriguing narratives that explore the interplay between technology and human behavior. From George Orwell's "1984" to Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World," dystopian visions of technological control and societal manipulation highlight the perennial tension between individual autonomy and the omnipresence of digital connectivity. These literary works, while fictional in nature, present compelling allegories that invite contemplation on the intricate fabric of human agency and technological influence.
Turning to unconventional sources, a thorough exploration of the internet landscape includes an unconventional repository of knowledge: the ubiquitous CVS receipts. While not traditionally considered a scholarly source, the abundance of information contained within these daily artifacts offers a whimsical yet unexpectedly insightful lens through which to discern the varied facets of modern consumerism and, by extension, the digital interconnectedness that shapes contemporary socio-political landscapes.
As we meander through the labyrinth of scholarly inquiry and literary imagination, our journey to elucidate the entwined narratives of online presence and political preference embarks on a decidedly offbeat trajectory, unveiling unexpected avenues of contemplation and scholarly mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin over the period 1991 to 2016. The correlation, which was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9709462 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggests a robust and highly significant relationship between these two variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of websites and libertarian votes. The data points appear to be tightly clustered around a clear upward trend, indicating that as the number of websites increases, so do the libertarian votes.
This noteworthy relationship prompts an intriguing line of inquiry into the potential influence of the digital world on political preferences, particularly in the context of libertarian-leaning electorate in Wisconsin. The strength of the correlation underscores the need to further explore the mechanisms through which online presence may shape individuals' political inclinations, offering a new perspective on the interplay between cyber activity and voting behavior.
The statistical findings provide compelling evidence of a profound association between the virtual terrain of the internet and the realm of political decision-making. While the precise mechanisms driving this correlation remain open to interpretation, the results of this study highlight the need for continued exploration of the complex interdependence between cyber engagement and political ideology.
In conclusion, our research has brought to light a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin. These findings expand the scope of inquiry into the potential impact of digital connectivity on political behavior, paving the way for further investigation into the intricate dynamics of online presence and voting preferences. It seems that in the digital age, web surfing may have taken on a whole new political dimension.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study underscore the markedly high correlation between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, illuminating a surprisingly strong link between cyber activity and political behavior. These results are in line with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2012), who have also identified a positive association between online engagement and libertarian-leaning individuals. The robustness and statistical significance of the correlation coefficient validate the notion that digital connectivity may indeed entangle the voting behavior of citizens, echoing the prescient insights offered by Jones (2018) into the potential influence of the internet on societal dynamics.

The strong positive correlation, as visually depicted in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), provides a compelling indication that as the number of websites increases, so do the libertarian votes. This peculiar cyber-territorial sway over political inclinations harks back to the cautionary tales of dystopian visions in literature, where the omnipresence of technology holds sway over individual autonomy. While perhaps not as nightmarish as the dystopian futures portrayed in fiction, our findings do raise thought-provoking questions about the extent to which the virtual landscape may weave its influence into the fabric of democratic decision-making.

One cannot help but draw a parallel between the unexpected avenues of contemplation offered by the scholarly inquiry and the surprisingly insightful vantage point offered by unconventional sources such as the ubiquitous CVS receipts. While these artifacts may seem trivial at first glance, they serve as an unlikely yet apt metaphor for the encroach of digital interconnectedness into the spheres of political preference and human agency. Indeed, the innumerable tendrils of the internet, much like the mysterious length of a CVS receipt, seem to extend their reach into areas that one might not expect.

Our study, while grounded in statistical rigor, ventures into the realm of digital whimsy, prompting a rethinking of the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes. The results not only add a new dimension to the scholarly inquiry but also leave open a multitude of quirky questions about how the intricacies of cyber activity may untangle the web of political preferences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of modern political analysis, understanding the factors that influence voting behavior is of paramount importance. The advent of the digital age has introduced a new and fascinating dimension to this inquiry, as the interconnected web of cyber activity has the potential to sway political preferences in unforeseen ways. As we delve into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, we embark on a journey to untangle the intricate strands of online presence and political ideology.
The construct of libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual liberty and limited government intervention, has garnered a dedicated following, particularly in the Badger State. Wisconsin, renowned for its cheese, football, and political paradoxes, provides an intriguing backdrop for exploring the interplay between digital connectivity and political allegiance. Through rigorous analysis of data spanning a quarter-century, our study uncovers a correlation that may reveal underlying patterns in the cyber and political domains.
The association between the cyber realm and political behavior is still relatively nascent in the annals of academic research. However, with the proliferation of online platforms and the increasing digitization of social interaction, it is imperative to examine the potential influence of the digital world on democratic decision-making. In this spirit of inquiry, our investigation aims to shed light on the nuanced dynamics of cyber engagement and political affiliations, all while surfacing innovative insights through statistical analysis and methodological rigor.
With this backdrop, we invite you to join us in this journey through the virtual corridors of the internet and the ballot box, as we seek to answer the intriguing question: can webs unravel votes? This inquiry promises to offer a fresh perspective on the evolving landscape of political engagement, with the potential to expand the scope of electoral research and illuminate unexpected connections between the cyber and political domains.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin over the period 1991 to 2016. The correlation, which was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9709462 and a p-value less than 0.01, suggests a robust and highly significant relationship between these two variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the number of websites and libertarian votes. The data points appear to be tightly clustered around a clear upward trend, indicating that as the number of websites increases, so do the libertarian votes.
This noteworthy relationship prompts an intriguing line of inquiry into the potential influence of the digital world on political preferences, particularly in the context of libertarian-leaning electorate in Wisconsin. The strength of the correlation underscores the need to further explore the mechanisms through which online presence may shape individuals' political inclinations, offering a new perspective on the interplay between cyber activity and voting behavior.
The statistical findings provide compelling evidence of a profound association between the virtual terrain of the internet and the realm of political decision-making. While the precise mechanisms driving this correlation remain open to interpretation, the results of this study highlight the need for continued exploration of the complex interdependence between cyber engagement and political ideology.
In conclusion, our research has brought to light a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin. These findings expand the scope of inquiry into the potential impact of digital connectivity on political behavior, paving the way for further investigation into the intricate dynamics of online presence and voting preferences. It seems that in the digital age, web surfing may have taken on a whole new political dimension.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In scrutinizing the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin, our study has unraveled an exceedingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660, signifying a robust and statistically significant link between cyber activity and political preference. The proverbial "world wide vote" takes on a new significance as our findings indicate a compelling interplay between the virtual web and the ballot box. While we've spun a convincing statistical yarn, it must be noted that correlation does not imply causation – after all, we'd be weaving quite the conspiracy theory if we suggested every website is a polling station.

The data presented in our study prompt a reconsideration of the factors influencing political ideology in the digital age, raising questions about the impact of online presence on voters' decision-making processes. As we reflect on our findings, it becomes clear that the online landscape may have morphed into a digital agora where political allegiances are subtly shaped. However, let's not jump to conclusions – the internet may be vast, but to argue that it single-handedly dictates political leanings would be quite the overreach.

Our study serves as a call to action for further exploration into the nuanced dynamics of cyber engagement and political affiliations. Even as we revel in the statistical elegance of our findings, it's imperative to approach this correlation with cautious skepticism. While our research has shed light on the entanglement of cyber activity and political behavior, we must resist the temptation to cast the internet as a political puppet master – the notion of every website exerting surreptitious influence would be a farce of the highest order.

In the spirit of scholarly inquiry, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have spun a web of insight that captures the intriguing interplay between the cyber and political spheres. Our study signifies a notable contribution to the body of knowledge on digital influence on political behavior, and we look forward to seeing how future research endeavors will continue to peel back the layers of this intricate relationship. After all, in the realm of online politics, the algorithmic intrigue is far from over.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Technological Policy and Electoral Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Techno-Political Inquiry and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Study of Libertarian Electorate and Cyber State: Can Webs Unravel Votes? with an abstract of This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the libertarian votes for Senators in Wisconsin from 1991 to 2016. Drawing on data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, our research team explores whether a web of digital connectivity could, in fact, entangle the voting behavior of libertarian-leaning citizens. Through statistical analysis, we uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9853660 with statistical significance (p < 0.01), suggesting a strong connection between cyber activity and political behavior. Join us as we unravel the tangled link between online presence and political preference, bringing a new dimension to the phrase "surfing the web" in the context of senatorial votes.

ChatGPT:

libertarian electorate, cyber state, web presence, online activity, political behavior, Senators, Wisconsin, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Internet Live Stats, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, web surfing, voting behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in Wisconsin
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin

Number of websites on the internet
Detailed data title: Number of websites, measured by unique hostnames
Source: Internet Live Stats
See what else correlates with Number of websites on the internet

Correlation r = 0.9853660 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9709462 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of websites on the internet) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin) over the 7 years from 1991 through 2016.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.9E-5. 0.0000493679533594535930000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.0049% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 20,256 random variables You don't actually need 20 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992199419982000200420122016
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin (Total votes)91471543955912134883676224087531
Number of websites on the internet (Websites)102738241007017087200516116006970890001045530000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9147,15439,5591,21348,8367,62240,87531,])
array_2 = np.array([10,2738,2410070,17087200,51611600,697089000,1045530000,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Number of websites on the internet"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5357 · Black Variable ID: 26337 · Red Variable ID: 370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0