Download png, svg
AI explanation
As households spent more on processed vegetables, they unknowingly absorbed the extra pun energy stored in these artificially enhanced veggies. This led to an uptick in the overall appreciation for wordplay and wit, resulting in an increased desire to engage with the stand-up math content through comments. It seems like the real value of these processed vegetables was adding a new level of humor to the viewers' experience!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring the scene of a classic American kitchen, where a joyful family is cooking and dining together. The kitchen is stocked with processed vegetables, symbolizing a rise in annual household spending on such products. The family members are gathered around a laptop, watching Matt Parker's YouTube videos and participating in lively discussions, emphasizing the average number of comments on his videos. The atmosphere is lighthearted and filled with puns, representing a newfound appreciation for humor and wit. The visual should portray the warmth and togetherness of the family, the abundance of processed vegetables, and the jovial atmosphere surrounding the laptop. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Glitch art Steampunk Magic realism A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos, in the following situation: As households spent more on processed vegetables, they unknowingly absorbed the extra pun energy stored in these artificially enhanced veggies. This led to an uptick in the overall appreciation for wordplay and wit, resulting in an increased desire to engage with the stand-up math content through comments. It seems like the real value of these processed vegetables was adding a new level of humor to the viewers' experience!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classic American kitchen, a family is seen happily cooking and enjoying a meal together. The refrigerator is stocked with various processed vegetables, illustrating an increase in annual household spending on processed vegetables. Additionally, the family is gathered around a laptop, watching Matt Parker's YouTube videos while engaging in lively discussions and leaving numerous comments, indicative of the average number of comments on his videos. The atmosphere is jovial and filled with puns, highlighting the newfound appreciation for humor and wit.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a classic American kitchen, a family is seen happily cooking and enjoying a meal together. The refrigerator is stocked with various processed vegetables, illustrating an increase in annual household spending on processed vegetables. Additionally, the family is gathered around a laptop, watching Matt Parker's YouTube videos while engaging in lively discussions and leaving numerous comments, indicative of the average number of comments on his videos. The atmosphere is jovial and filled with puns, highlighting the newfound appreciation for humor and wit. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring the scene of a classic American kitchen, where a joyful family is cooking and dining together. The kitchen is stocked with processed vegetables, symbolizing a rise in annual household spending on such products. The family members are gathered around a laptop, watching Matt Parker's YouTube videos and participating in lively discussions, emphasizing the average number of comments on his videos. The atmosphere is lighthearted and filled with puns, representing a newfound appreciation for humor and wit. The visual should portray the warmth and togetherness of the family, the abundance of processed vegetables, and the jovial atmosphere surrounding the laptop.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on processed vegetables caused Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos to increase.
AI academic paper
Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments Journal of Mathematical Munchies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Introduction
The mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with seemingly unrelated factors have long captivated researchers across fields as diverse as economics, psychology, and nutrition. In this light-hearted yet thought-provoking research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlations between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. With a statistical rigor that's sharper than a paring knife, we aim to uncover the hidden connections between dietary habits and mathematical amusement.
Figure 1: A scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure vs. Stand-up Maths video comments.
The field of statistical analysis has seen its fair share of dry and unappetizing research topics, but the tantalizing link between edible greens and numerical humor promises to add a pinch of zest to the traditional academic fare. As we peel back the layers of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, it becomes apparent that behind the curtain of mundane numerical figures lies a compelling narrative of humor, nutrition, and consumer behavior. The findings of this study, with a correlation coefficient that's as strong as a sturdy celery stalk, challenge conventional notions of what influences individual engagement with mathematical content.
One might wonder whether the love of mathematics and the consumption of processed vegetables share a deeper, more intimate bond than previously believed. Could it be that as households stock up on canned peas and frozen broccoli, they unwittingly prepare themselves for an enriched experience of mathematical discourse? The implications of this study are as far-reaching as they are wholesome, potentially opening a can of worms in the world of consumer behavior and entertainment preferences. After all, who would have thought that a bag of mixed frozen vegetables could serve as a side dish to an intellectually stimulating conversation on geometry?
In the pages that follow, we invite readers to join us in pondering the complexity of human behavior and its inconspicuous harmonies. So sit back, grab a carrot stick, and prepare to unearth the unlikely connections that tie together processed veggies and mathematical merriment. It's time to embark on a statistical journey that's as palatable as it is illuminating.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with seemingly unrelated factors have long captivated researchers across fields as diverse as economics, psychology, and nutrition. In this light-hearted yet thought-provoking research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlations between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. With a statistical rigor that's sharper than a paring knife, we aim to uncover the hidden connections between dietary habits and mathematical amusement.
Figure 1: A scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure vs. Stand-up Maths video comments.
The field of statistical analysis has seen its fair share of dry and unappetizing research topics, but the tantalizing link between edible greens and numerical humor promises to add a pinch of zest to the traditional academic fare. As we peel back the layers of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, it becomes apparent that behind the curtain of mundane numerical figures lies a compelling narrative of humor, nutrition, and consumer behavior. The findings of this study, with a correlation coefficient that's as strong as a sturdy celery stalk, challenge conventional notions of what influences individual engagement with mathematical content.
One might wonder whether the love of mathematics and the consumption of processed vegetables share a deeper, more intimate bond than previously believed. Could it be that as households stock up on canned peas and frozen broccoli, they unwittingly prepare themselves for an enriched experience of mathematical discourse? The implications of this study are as far-reaching as they are wholesome, potentially opening a can of worms in the world of consumer behavior and entertainment preferences. After all, who would have thought that a bag of mixed frozen vegetables could serve as a side dish to an intellectually stimulating conversation on geometry?
In the pages that follow, we invite readers to join us in pondering the complexity of human behavior and its inconspicuous harmonies. So sit back, grab a carrot stick, and prepare to unearth the unlikely connections that tie together processed veggies and mathematical merriment. It's time to embark on a statistical journey that's as palatable as it is illuminating.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the correlation between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos has sparked keen interest among researchers in various fields. The convergence of dietary habits and online engagement with mathematical humor presents a curious juxtaposition that defies conventional expectations. Studies by Smith et al. and Doe et al. have delved into the complexities of consumer behavior, shedding light on the factors influencing food choices and recreational interests.
In "The Economics of Vegetables," Smith et al. examine the trends in processed vegetable consumption and its implications for household budgets. The authors find a nuanced relationship between vegetable expenditures and income levels, unveiling the shifting patterns of food preferences across socioeconomic strata. Meanwhile, Doe et al.'s work in "Mathematical Humor in the Digital Age" unravels the dynamics of online interactions within the mathematical community. Their research offers valuable insights into the factors that contribute to audience engagement with mathematical content, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected interplay between vegetable spending and mathematical discourse.
Expanding the scope to encompass broader societal influences, Jones et al. analyze the cultural significance of culinary choices in "Food, Fun, and Frivolity." Their exploration of the links between food culture and recreational activities underscores the intricate connections between dietary practices and leisure pursuits. While these scholarly endeavors provide a foundation for understanding the individual components of our study, they fall short of addressing the peculiar convergence of processed vegetables and mathematical humor.
Venturing into the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a comprehensive examination of modern food habits, presenting a piece of the puzzle in understanding the motivations behind processed vegetable consumption. Likewise, "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner provides an insightful take on the unexpected correlations that shape human behavior, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the whimsical relationship between vegetable spending and mathematical entertainment.
Turning to fictional narratives that hold a tangential relevance, "The Adventures of Alice in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll beckons readers into a whimsical realm where logical absurdities abound. Though seemingly distant from the empirical inquiries of our study, the playful interplay of logic and surrealism in Carroll's work offers a curious parallel to the unexpected correlation we seek to unravel. Furthermore, the intergalactic adventures in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams remind us of the boundless possibilities that await in the quest for unconventional connections.
In a lighthearted detour, we acknowledge the valuable insights gleaned from the observational adventures of the animated characters in "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Phineas and Ferb." As we embark on our statistical odyssey, these unconventional sources serve as whimsical reminders of the multifaceted nature of human behavior and the offbeat pathways that may lead to unexpected discoveries.
In the spirit of intellectual merriment, we immerse ourselves in a playful exploration that transcends the boundaries of traditional research. With a nod to the enigmatic nature of human preferences and the whims of statistical correlations, we prepare to uncover the delightful and potentially uproarious connections between processed vegetables and mathematical amusement.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with seemingly unrelated factors have long captivated researchers across fields as diverse as economics, psychology, and nutrition. In this light-hearted yet thought-provoking research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlations between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. With a statistical rigor that's sharper than a paring knife, we aim to uncover the hidden connections between dietary habits and mathematical amusement.
Figure 1: A scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure vs. Stand-up Maths video comments.
The field of statistical analysis has seen its fair share of dry and unappetizing research topics, but the tantalizing link between edible greens and numerical humor promises to add a pinch of zest to the traditional academic fare. As we peel back the layers of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, it becomes apparent that behind the curtain of mundane numerical figures lies a compelling narrative of humor, nutrition, and consumer behavior. The findings of this study, with a correlation coefficient that's as strong as a sturdy celery stalk, challenge conventional notions of what influences individual engagement with mathematical content.
One might wonder whether the love of mathematics and the consumption of processed vegetables share a deeper, more intimate bond than previously believed. Could it be that as households stock up on canned peas and frozen broccoli, they unwittingly prepare themselves for an enriched experience of mathematical discourse? The implications of this study are as far-reaching as they are wholesome, potentially opening a can of worms in the world of consumer behavior and entertainment preferences. After all, who would have thought that a bag of mixed frozen vegetables could serve as a side dish to an intellectually stimulating conversation on geometry?
In the pages that follow, we invite readers to join us in pondering the complexity of human behavior and its inconspicuous harmonies. So sit back, grab a carrot stick, and prepare to unearth the unlikely connections that tie together processed veggies and mathematical merriment. It's time to embark on a statistical journey that's as palatable as it is illuminating.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To explore the intriguing relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos, our research team engaged in a series of data collection and analysis methods that were as varied and unexpected as the connection we sought to uncover. Our approach was akin to searching for the proverbial needle in a haystack, but instead of hay, we were sifting through a mountain of data sets.
Data Collection:
For the quantitative aspect of our study, we turned to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leveraging the treasure trove of information on consumer expenditure patterns. Armed with spreadsheets and a hearty dose of optimism, we combed through tables, graphs, and figures, tracking the annual household spending on processed vegetables from 2011 to 2022. Meanwhile, our exploration of the digital realm led us to the world of YouTube, where we meticulously tallied the average number of comments on the illustrious Stand-up Maths channel. The amalgamation of these disparate sources allowed us to construct a robust dataset that reflected both the crunch of vegetables and the wit of mathematical musings.
Data Analysis:
With our dataset in hand, we embarked on a statistical escapade to uncover any semblance of correlation between the consumption of processed vegetables and the level of engagement with mathematical humor. Employing correlation analysis techniques, we sought to quantify the strength of the association, akin to determining the tanginess of a tomato or the sweetness of a pepper. Our statistical toolbox included Pearson's correlation coefficient, which dutifully measured the linear relationship between the two variables, and hypothesis testing to ascertain the significance of any detected correlation.
Advanced Techniques:
In a bid to add a touch of whimsy to our analysis, we entertained the thought of employing unconventional methods, such as engaging in a boisterous game of vegetable-themed word association or devising mathematical models based on the Fibonacci sequence of vegetable consumption. Alas, we ultimately deferred to the time-tested statistical methodologies to ensure the integrity of our findings. Nonetheless, the thought of veggie-based wordplay did bring a touch of levity to our data analysis sessions.
Limitations:
As with any research endeavor, we encountered our fair share of challenges and limitations. The inherent complexities of human behavior and the multifaceted nature of online engagement meant that our study could not capture the entirety of the human experience. Additionally, while we entertained the idea of conducting a fun, vegetable-themed survey to gauge attitudes toward math, time and resources dictated otherwise. Nonetheless, we navigated these constraints with the resilience of a sprouting seedling, ensuring that our study retained its scientific rigor.
In sum, our methodology embodied the spirit of our research—unconventional, spirited, and relentlessly curious. Through a blend of traditional statistical techniques and offbeat musings, we sought to shed light on the unexpected cohesion of vegetables and mathematical hilarity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube .
For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8790348, r-squared of 0.7727022, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with seemingly unrelated factors have long captivated researchers across fields as diverse as economics, psychology, and nutrition. In this light-hearted yet thought-provoking research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlations between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. With a statistical rigor that's sharper than a paring knife, we aim to uncover the hidden connections between dietary habits and mathematical amusement.
Figure 1: A scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure vs. Stand-up Maths video comments.
The field of statistical analysis has seen its fair share of dry and unappetizing research topics, but the tantalizing link between edible greens and numerical humor promises to add a pinch of zest to the traditional academic fare. As we peel back the layers of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, it becomes apparent that behind the curtain of mundane numerical figures lies a compelling narrative of humor, nutrition, and consumer behavior. The findings of this study, with a correlation coefficient that's as strong as a sturdy celery stalk, challenge conventional notions of what influences individual engagement with mathematical content.
One might wonder whether the love of mathematics and the consumption of processed vegetables share a deeper, more intimate bond than previously believed. Could it be that as households stock up on canned peas and frozen broccoli, they unwittingly prepare themselves for an enriched experience of mathematical discourse? The implications of this study are as far-reaching as they are wholesome, potentially opening a can of worms in the world of consumer behavior and entertainment preferences. After all, who would have thought that a bag of mixed frozen vegetables could serve as a side dish to an intellectually stimulating conversation on geometry?
In the pages that follow, we invite readers to join us in pondering the complexity of human behavior and its inconspicuous harmonies. So sit back, grab a carrot stick, and prepare to unearth the unlikely connections that tie together processed veggies and mathematical merriment. It's time to embark on a statistical journey that's as palatable as it is illuminating.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos yielded an intriguing outcome. The correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 and an r-squared value of 0.7727022 indicate a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly disparate variables over the period from 2011 to 2022. This statistically robust connection is suggestive of a pronounced influence of processed vegetable consumption on viewers' engagement with mathematical humor.
As presented in Figure 1, the scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure against the number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos paints a compelling picture. The data points form a clear, upward-trending pattern, reminiscent of the steady ascent of a beanstalk in a mathematical fairytale. The strength of this association is as unmistakable as the crunch of a fresh carrot, garnering attention for its unexpected and flavorful findings.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further underscores the confidence in the observed correlation, affirming that this relationship is not merely a statistical fluke but rather a substantial and noteworthy discovery. It appears that while one might be crunching on chips or savoring a spoonful of canned peas, an unseen force may be propelling them to engage in mathematical banter.
These results prompt contemplation of the broader implications of vegetable consumption on recreational engagement with mathematical content. Could it be that a hearty serving of processed veggies primes the mind for a comedic journey through numbers and equations? The potential far-reaching effects of this finding are as rich as a garden salad, inviting further exploration into the quirks of human behavior and its unexpected ties to diverse aspects of daily life.
This study sheds light on the intertwined dynamics of diet and leisure, serving as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like a well-cooked meal, can be more than the sum of its parts. The unexpected connection discovered in our research adds a dash of spice to the field of statistical inquiry and underscores the delightful complexity of human behavior. These findings will, without a doubt, leave both researchers and readers hungry for more investigations into the curious interplay of dietary choices and recreational engagement.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the correlation between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos has sparked keen interest among researchers in various fields. The convergence of dietary habits and online engagement with mathematical humor presents a curious juxtaposition that defies conventional expectations. Studies by Smith et al. and Doe et al. have delved into the complexities of consumer behavior, shedding light on the factors influencing food choices and recreational interests.
In "The Economics of Vegetables," Smith et al. examine the trends in processed vegetable consumption and its implications for household budgets. The authors find a nuanced relationship between vegetable expenditures and income levels, unveiling the shifting patterns of food preferences across socioeconomic strata. Meanwhile, Doe et al.'s work in "Mathematical Humor in the Digital Age" unravels the dynamics of online interactions within the mathematical community. Their research offers valuable insights into the factors that contribute to audience engagement with mathematical content, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected interplay between vegetable spending and mathematical discourse.
Expanding the scope to encompass broader societal influences, Jones et al. analyze the cultural significance of culinary choices in "Food, Fun, and Frivolity." Their exploration of the links between food culture and recreational activities underscores the intricate connections between dietary practices and leisure pursuits. While these scholarly endeavors provide a foundation for understanding the individual components of our study, they fall short of addressing the peculiar convergence of processed vegetables and mathematical humor.
Venturing into the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a comprehensive examination of modern food habits, presenting a piece of the puzzle in understanding the motivations behind processed vegetable consumption. Likewise, "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner provides an insightful take on the unexpected correlations that shape human behavior, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the whimsical relationship between vegetable spending and mathematical entertainment.
Turning to fictional narratives that hold a tangential relevance, "The Adventures of Alice in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll beckons readers into a whimsical realm where logical absurdities abound. Though seemingly distant from the empirical inquiries of our study, the playful interplay of logic and surrealism in Carroll's work offers a curious parallel to the unexpected correlation we seek to unravel. Furthermore, the intergalactic adventures in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams remind us of the boundless possibilities that await in the quest for unconventional connections.
In a lighthearted detour, we acknowledge the valuable insights gleaned from the observational adventures of the animated characters in "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Phineas and Ferb." As we embark on our statistical odyssey, these unconventional sources serve as whimsical reminders of the multifaceted nature of human behavior and the offbeat pathways that may lead to unexpected discoveries.
In the spirit of intellectual merriment, we immerse ourselves in a playful exploration that transcends the boundaries of traditional research. With a nod to the enigmatic nature of human preferences and the whims of statistical correlations, we prepare to uncover the delightful and potentially uproarious connections between processed vegetables and mathematical amusement.
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos yielded an intriguing outcome. The correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 and an r-squared value of 0.7727022 indicate a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly disparate variables over the period from 2011 to 2022. This statistically robust connection is suggestive of a pronounced influence of processed vegetable consumption on viewers' engagement with mathematical humor.
As presented in Figure 1, the scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure against the number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos paints a compelling picture. The data points form a clear, upward-trending pattern, reminiscent of the steady ascent of a beanstalk in a mathematical fairytale. The strength of this association is as unmistakable as the crunch of a fresh carrot, garnering attention for its unexpected and flavorful findings.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further underscores the confidence in the observed correlation, affirming that this relationship is not merely a statistical fluke but rather a substantial and noteworthy discovery. It appears that while one might be crunching on chips or savoring a spoonful of canned peas, an unseen force may be propelling them to engage in mathematical banter.
These results prompt contemplation of the broader implications of vegetable consumption on recreational engagement with mathematical content. Could it be that a hearty serving of processed veggies primes the mind for a comedic journey through numbers and equations? The potential far-reaching effects of this finding are as rich as a garden salad, inviting further exploration into the quirks of human behavior and its unexpected ties to diverse aspects of daily life.
This study sheds light on the intertwined dynamics of diet and leisure, serving as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like a well-cooked meal, can be more than the sum of its parts. The unexpected connection discovered in our research adds a dash of spice to the field of statistical inquiry and underscores the delightful complexity of human behavior. These findings will, without a doubt, leave both researchers and readers hungry for more investigations into the curious interplay of dietary choices and recreational engagement.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Expanding upon the whimsical journey of our statistical odyssey, our findings lay bare the unexpected correlation between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 serves as a testament to the entwined fates of processed veggies and mathematical merriment. As predicted in the "The Economics of Vegetables" by Smith et al. and the charmingly titled "Mathematical Humor in the Digital Age" by Doe et al., the interplay of vegetable spending and audience engagement with mathematical content is substantiated by our findings. The solidification of this link reinforces the notion that trends in processed vegetable consumption may exert a flavorful influence on the receptiveness to mathematical humor, akin to a zesty seasoning on a mathematical equation.
Remarkably, our results unveil a correlation as unmistakable as a formula's elegant simplicity. The upward-trending pattern in the scatter plot mirrors the steady ascent of a beanstalk, alluding to the enchanting undercurrents that propel processed vegetable consumption toward engaging discussions of mathematical concepts. Like the layers of an onion, our study peels back the facades of conventional wisdom to reveal the multifaceted flavors of human behavior, wherein indulging in a diet rich in processed veggies may kindle an appetite for numerical wit.
Moreover, the reciprocal impact of dietary choices on recreational engagement echoes the musings of Jones et al. in "Food, Fun, and Frivolity," enriching the tapestry of understanding the inter-relatedness of culinary preferences and leisure pursuits. The unexpected association we unearth underscores the kaleidoscopic nature of human preferences, reminding us that the whims of statistical correlations can traverse the unlikeliest of territories, much like a bold wanderer through an uncharted mathematical landscape.
In conclusion, our exploration transcends the stale confines of traditional research, embracing the serendipitous avenues of intellectual merriment. The laughs and learning ingrained in our findings open the door to a realm where dietary choices and recreational engagements coalesce in unexpected harmonies. Just as a well-prepared dish tantalizes the palate, this unexpected connection stirs the intellectual appetite, leaving both researchers and readers craving further explorations into the delightful and potentially uproarious influences of processed vegetables on mathematical amusement.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on processed vegetables and Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The mysterious ways in which human behavior intersects with seemingly unrelated factors have long captivated researchers across fields as diverse as economics, psychology, and nutrition. In this light-hearted yet thought-provoking research paper, we delve into the unexpected correlations between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. With a statistical rigor that's sharper than a paring knife, we aim to uncover the hidden connections between dietary habits and mathematical amusement.
Figure 1: A scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure vs. Stand-up Maths video comments.
The field of statistical analysis has seen its fair share of dry and unappetizing research topics, but the tantalizing link between edible greens and numerical humor promises to add a pinch of zest to the traditional academic fare. As we peel back the layers of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, it becomes apparent that behind the curtain of mundane numerical figures lies a compelling narrative of humor, nutrition, and consumer behavior. The findings of this study, with a correlation coefficient that's as strong as a sturdy celery stalk, challenge conventional notions of what influences individual engagement with mathematical content.
One might wonder whether the love of mathematics and the consumption of processed vegetables share a deeper, more intimate bond than previously believed. Could it be that as households stock up on canned peas and frozen broccoli, they unwittingly prepare themselves for an enriched experience of mathematical discourse? The implications of this study are as far-reaching as they are wholesome, potentially opening a can of worms in the world of consumer behavior and entertainment preferences. After all, who would have thought that a bag of mixed frozen vegetables could serve as a side dish to an intellectually stimulating conversation on geometry?
In the pages that follow, we invite readers to join us in pondering the complexity of human behavior and its inconspicuous harmonies. So sit back, grab a carrot stick, and prepare to unearth the unlikely connections that tie together processed veggies and mathematical merriment. It's time to embark on a statistical journey that's as palatable as it is illuminating.
[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos yielded an intriguing outcome. The correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 and an r-squared value of 0.7727022 indicate a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly disparate variables over the period from 2011 to 2022. This statistically robust connection is suggestive of a pronounced influence of processed vegetable consumption on viewers' engagement with mathematical humor.
As presented in Figure 1, the scatter plot of processed vegetable expenditure against the number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos paints a compelling picture. The data points form a clear, upward-trending pattern, reminiscent of the steady ascent of a beanstalk in a mathematical fairytale. The strength of this association is as unmistakable as the crunch of a fresh carrot, garnering attention for its unexpected and flavorful findings.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further underscores the confidence in the observed correlation, affirming that this relationship is not merely a statistical fluke but rather a substantial and noteworthy discovery. It appears that while one might be crunching on chips or savoring a spoonful of canned peas, an unseen force may be propelling them to engage in mathematical banter.
These results prompt contemplation of the broader implications of vegetable consumption on recreational engagement with mathematical content. Could it be that a hearty serving of processed veggies primes the mind for a comedic journey through numbers and equations? The potential far-reaching effects of this finding are as rich as a garden salad, inviting further exploration into the quirks of human behavior and its unexpected ties to diverse aspects of daily life.
This study sheds light on the intertwined dynamics of diet and leisure, serving as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like a well-cooked meal, can be more than the sum of its parts. The unexpected connection discovered in our research adds a dash of spice to the field of statistical inquiry and underscores the delightful complexity of human behavior. These findings will, without a doubt, leave both researchers and readers hungry for more investigations into the curious interplay of dietary choices and recreational engagement.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has peeled back the layers of mundane statistical analysis to reveal an intriguing connection between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 and a significance level of p < 0.01 suggest that there is more to this relationship than meets the eye – or the taste buds, for that matter.
The striking association between vegetable expenditure and mathematical amusement holds promise for a more flavorful understanding of human behavior. It seems that while most people may not associate processed veggies with comedic mathematics, our findings serve as a reminder that statistical analysis, much like a surprising ingredient in a dish, can unexpectedly enhance the sensory experience.
Further research exploring the impact of dietary choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content may continue to yield fruitful and, dare we say, nutritious results. However, with the unmistakable strength of the association discovered in this study, it seems that no more probing into this particular connection is needed. As for the next steps, perhaps it's time to toss some statistical salad and explore other unexpected pairings in the world of consumer behavior and entertainment preferences. After all, who knows what other unlikely correlations are waiting to be unearthed – perhaps the link between ice cream consumption and interest in particle physics?
With these unexpected results leaving us with a sense of both amusement and hunger for more statistical culinary adventures, it's clear that the dynamics of human behavior are as rich and diverse as a well-stocked buffet. As we continue to savor the complexities of statistical analysis, may we always be open to finding laughter and unexpected connections in the most unlikely places.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Mathematical Munchies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Nutrient-Rich Humor Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments with an abstract of This study presents an examination of the curious relationship between annual US household spending on processed vegetables and the average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, our research team employed statistical methods to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8790348 with a significance level of p < 0.01 over the period of 2011 to 2022. This robust correlation raises intriguing questions regarding the interconnectedness of dietary choices and engagement with mathematical humor. The findings offer an unexpected insight into the potential influence of vegetable consumption on the receptiveness to mathematical entertainment. Surprisingly, it seems that while the consumption of processed veggies may leave a bad taste in one's mouth, it may also lead to enjoyable discussions of mathematical concepts. This study adds a lighthearted twist to the often dry field of statistical analysis and invites further laughter-inducing inquiries into the impacts of food choices on recreational engagement with mathematical content.
ChatGPT:
US household spending on processed vegetables, Stand-up Maths YouTube video comments, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, dietary choices, mathematical humor, vegetable consumption, mathematical entertainment, food choices, recreational engagement
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Annual US household spending on processed vegetablesDetailed data title: Average annual household spend on processed vegetables
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on processed vegetables
Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on Stand-up Maths YouTube videos.
Source: Stand-up Maths on YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7727022 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on processed vegetables) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00017. 0.0001659290315206149000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,027 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.62, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Annual US household spending on processed vegetables (Household spend) | 128 | 130 | 130 | 133 | 130 | 133 | 136 | 144 | 147 | 192 | 194 | 197 |
Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos (Average Comments) | 290 | 760.667 | 225.333 | 1269.5 | 458.2 | 1821.24 | 923.7 | 760 | 946.966 | 3052 | 3263.36 | 2238.68 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([128,130,130,133,130,133,136,144,147,192,194,197,])
array_2 = np.array([290,760.667,225.333,1269.5,458.2,1821.24,923.7,760,946.966,3052,3263.36,2238.68,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on processed vegetables"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Annual US household spending on processed vegetables
- Line chart for only Average number of comments on Matt Parker's YouTube videos
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Laughing at Math While Eating Veggies: A Statistical Analysis of US Household Spending on Processed Vegetables and Stand-up Maths YouTube Video Comments
Big thanks for reviewing!
Correlation ID: 5567 · Black Variable ID: 19900 · Red Variable ID: 25796