about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,576 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'doge' meme and the second variable is Google searches for 'Numberphile'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'doge' meme gained traction, more people became familiar with the concept of numbers, leading them to seek out entertaining and educational math content like Numberphile. The internet's love for 'doge' inadvertently unleashed a wave of numerical curiosity, proving once again that even a meme can't escape the fundamental laws of arithmetic. Remember, much math, so wow!

Create a meme inspired by the doge meme that in some way references Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'doge' meme caused Numberphile (Google searches for 'Numberphile') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches

The Journal of Memetics and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the vast and enigmatic realm of the internet, memes and mathematical curiosities often collide in unexpected ways, leading to an intriguing confluence of popular culture and intellectual pursuits. The 'doge' meme, characterized by its shiba inu protagonist and expressive comic sans captions, has wagged its way into the hearts and screens of netizens across the globe. Simultaneously, 'Numberphile', a platform dedicated to elucidating the fascinating intricacies of numbers and mathematics, has garnered its own following of inquisitive minds seeking numerical enlightenment.

In this study, we embark on an expedition to uncover the mysterious relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. While one may assume that the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' have as much in common as a steak and a squeaky toy, our research endeavors to unearth any underlying correlations. Through the utilization of Google Trends data, we aim to leash our understanding of the interplay between the howl-inducing popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in numerical musings of 'Numberphile'.

In this pursuit, we adhere to a rigorous analytical framework to avoid any accidental barking up the wrong tree. With a statistically intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01 howling in the background, our findings unearth a strong statistical link between the aforementioned entities, as if they were playing an intriguing game of "fetch" in the digital expanse. As we delve deeper into the results, we must ponder whether our discerning correlations are indeed leading us to the buried bones of truth or if we are merely chasing our tails in the boundless backyard of internet memes and mathematical curiosities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and enigmatic realm of the internet, memes and mathematical curiosities often collide in unexpected ways, leading to an intriguing confluence of popular culture and intellectual pursuits. The 'doge' meme, characterized by its shiba inu protagonist and expressive comic sans captions, has wagged its way into the hearts and screens of netizens across the globe. Simultaneously, 'Numberphile', a platform dedicated to elucidating the fascinating intricacies of numbers and mathematics, has garnered its own following of inquisitive minds seeking numerical enlightenment.
In this study, we embark on an expedition to uncover the mysterious relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. While one may assume that the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' have as much in common as a steak and a squeaky toy, our research endeavors to unearth any underlying correlations. Through the utilization of Google Trends data, we aim to leash our understanding of the interplay between the howl-inducing popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in numerical musings of 'Numberphile'.
In this pursuit, we adhere to a rigorous analytical framework to avoid any accidental barking up the wrong tree. With a statistically intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01 howling in the background, our findings unearth a strong statistical link between the aforementioned entities, as if they were playing an intriguing game of "fetch" in the digital expanse. As we delve deeper into the results, we must ponder whether our discerning correlations are indeed leading us to the buried bones of truth or if we are merely chasing our tails in the boundless backyard of internet memes and mathematical curiosities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the interconnected world of internet memes and mathematical curiosities has garnered notable attention in recent years. In their study, Smith et al. (2017) examined the virality of memes and its impact on online search behavior, shedding light on the potential correlations between seemingly incongruous online phenomena. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the realm of mathematical curiosities and their influence on digital engagement, positing intriguing connections between numerical concepts and popular culture manifestations.

At this point, it is essential to consider the broader implications of internet culture on individual preferences and search patterns. Lorem and Ipsum (2019) offered a comprehensive analysis of meme propagation and its ripple effects on diverse online activities, paving the way for a deeper understanding of internet phenomenons and their sway over digital behavior. However, amidst this sea of serious research, it is important to acknowledge the potential impact of more lighthearted sources on the understanding of this topic. Works such as "The Mathematics of Love" by Fry (2015) and "Memes: A Comprehensive Guide" by Hilarious (2020) provide alternative perspectives on the intersection of mathematical intrigue and internet whimsy, albeit in a more whimsical and nonscholarly manner.

In addition to formal academic studies and literary works, it is noteworthy to highlight the influence of social media discourse on the perceived connection between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' Google searches. Several Twitter and Reddit posts have surfaced, purporting intriguing observations regarding the congruence of canine internet humor and numerical curiosity. One user remarked, "I was searching for 'doge' memes and found myself knee-deep in 'Numberphile' videos. Coincidence? I think not." Such anecdotal evidence, although not empirically rigorous, contributes to the anecdotal tapestry of digital experiences and the unexpected intersections within the online landscape.

As we traverse the literature landscape, it becomes evident that the connection between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' entails a nuanced and multifaceted inquiry. While the scholarly discourse offers insightful research, the inclusion of more whimsical and informal sources enriches the understanding of the peculiar interplay between internet memes and mathematical musings. Moving forward, the synthesis of these diverse perspectives will prove invaluable in unraveling the riddle of their intriguing correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and enigmatic realm of the internet, memes and mathematical curiosities often collide in unexpected ways, leading to an intriguing confluence of popular culture and intellectual pursuits. The 'doge' meme, characterized by its shiba inu protagonist and expressive comic sans captions, has wagged its way into the hearts and screens of netizens across the globe. Simultaneously, 'Numberphile', a platform dedicated to elucidating the fascinating intricacies of numbers and mathematics, has garnered its own following of inquisitive minds seeking numerical enlightenment.
In this study, we embark on an expedition to uncover the mysterious relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. While one may assume that the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' have as much in common as a steak and a squeaky toy, our research endeavors to unearth any underlying correlations. Through the utilization of Google Trends data, we aim to leash our understanding of the interplay between the howl-inducing popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in numerical musings of 'Numberphile'.
In this pursuit, we adhere to a rigorous analytical framework to avoid any accidental barking up the wrong tree. With a statistically intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01 howling in the background, our findings unearth a strong statistical link between the aforementioned entities, as if they were playing an intriguing game of "fetch" in the digital expanse. As we delve deeper into the results, we must ponder whether our discerning correlations are indeed leading us to the buried bones of truth or if we are merely chasing our tails in the boundless backyard of internet memes and mathematical curiosities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To avoid any accidental barking up the wrong tree, our research team diligently devised a methodology that aimed to unravel the murky tangle of meme popularity and mathematical musings. The primary data source for our study was Google Trends, a veritable goldmine of search interest statistics that allowed us to sniff out correlations between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' over the years 2007 to 2023.

Firstly, we performed a comprehensive search query analysis to fetch relevant search terms associated with the 'doge' meme, ensuring we didn't overlook any hidden treasures of internet chatter. Our search netted a multitude of diverse ‘doge’ permutations – from "such wow" to "so coin," capturing the doge-lingo in all its varied glory.

Simultaneously, we embarked on a mathematical metamorphosis to unravel the enigmatic web of number interest on 'Numberphile', determining the correlation between the 'doge' meme popularity and the search interest in mathematical musings. This metamorphosis involved delving deep into numerical concepts, equations, and mathematical curiosities– a journey that would make even the most discerning mathematician do a double take.

Next, we utilized regression analysis to fetch the correlation coefficient, ensuring that our results were as robust as a shiba inu's loyalty. Our correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 unearthed a tantalizing connection between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile', akin to a game of online hide-and-seek where the hidden link finally reveals itself in all its statistical pet-fection.

Additionally, we employed time-series analysis to highlight any temporal patterns in search interest, recognizing that internet trends can be as fickle as a cat's affection. This analysis allowed us to appreciate the evolving dynamics between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, illustrating the ebb and flow of internet paws-ibilities.

Finally, we layered our methodology with statistical inference tests, ensuring that the findings were not just a flash in the pan, but rather as resolute as a determined pup in pursuit of its favorite chew toy. The statistical significance (p < 0.01) of our results reaffirmed the robustness of the correlations, leaving no room for statistical flea-dling.

In essence, our methodology was not just a walk in the park; it was a rigorous expedition through the winding trails of internet memes and the numerical mysteries of 'Numberphile', aiming to leash the intricate relationship between the two in a statistical paws-ition that leaves little room for ambiguity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8669510, r-squared of 0.7516040, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast and enigmatic realm of the internet, memes and mathematical curiosities often collide in unexpected ways, leading to an intriguing confluence of popular culture and intellectual pursuits. The 'doge' meme, characterized by its shiba inu protagonist and expressive comic sans captions, has wagged its way into the hearts and screens of netizens across the globe. Simultaneously, 'Numberphile', a platform dedicated to elucidating the fascinating intricacies of numbers and mathematics, has garnered its own following of inquisitive minds seeking numerical enlightenment.
In this study, we embark on an expedition to uncover the mysterious relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. While one may assume that the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' have as much in common as a steak and a squeaky toy, our research endeavors to unearth any underlying correlations. Through the utilization of Google Trends data, we aim to leash our understanding of the interplay between the howl-inducing popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in numerical musings of 'Numberphile'.
In this pursuit, we adhere to a rigorous analytical framework to avoid any accidental barking up the wrong tree. With a statistically intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01 howling in the background, our findings unearth a strong statistical link between the aforementioned entities, as if they were playing an intriguing game of "fetch" in the digital expanse. As we delve deeper into the results, we must ponder whether our discerning correlations are indeed leading us to the buried bones of truth or if we are merely chasing our tails in the boundless backyard of internet memes and mathematical curiosities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. The correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and an r-squared value of 0.7516040 attest to the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscores the statistical significance of this connection, providing compelling evidence that the rise of the 'doge' meme and the curiosity for numerical musings in 'Numberphile' are intertwined in the digital landscape.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between the popularity of the 'doge' meme and the Google search interest for 'Numberphile'. It is evident from the figure that as the 'doge' meme gained traction over the years, there was a corresponding increase in the search interest for 'Numberphile', portraying a curiously synchronized trend in the online sphere.

As we reflect on these findings, it becomes apparent that the intersection of internet memes and mathematical inquiries offers a compelling narrative of the interplay between popular culture and intellectual curiosity. While our investigation succeeded in unearthing a strong statistical link between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, it also raises tantalizing questions about the deeper motivations driving digital trends. This begs the amusing question: are we truly barking up the right tree with these correlations, or are we simply chasing our tails in the captivating expanse of meme-centric mathematics? These findings not only enrich our understanding of online phenomena but also tantalizingly leave us pondering the paw-sibilities of further explorations at the crossroads of internet culture and numerical musings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the interconnected world of internet memes and mathematical curiosities has garnered notable attention in recent years. In their study, Smith et al. (2017) examined the virality of memes and its impact on online search behavior, shedding light on the potential correlations between seemingly incongruous online phenomena. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the realm of mathematical curiosities and their influence on digital engagement, positing intriguing connections between numerical concepts and popular culture manifestations.
At this point, it is essential to consider the broader implications of internet culture on individual preferences and search patterns. Lorem and Ipsum (2019) offered a comprehensive analysis of meme propagation and its ripple effects on diverse online activities, paving the way for a deeper understanding of internet phenomenons and their sway over digital behavior. However, amidst this sea of serious research, it is important to acknowledge the potential impact of more lighthearted sources on the understanding of this topic. Works such as "The Mathematics of Love" by Fry (2015) and "Memes: A Comprehensive Guide" by Hilarious (2020) provide alternative perspectives on the intersection of mathematical intrigue and internet whimsy, albeit in a more whimsical and nonscholarly manner.
In addition to formal academic studies and literary works, it is noteworthy to highlight the influence of social media discourse on the perceived connection between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' Google searches. Several Twitter and Reddit posts have surfaced, purporting intriguing observations regarding the congruence of canine internet humor and numerical curiosity. One user remarked, "I was searching for 'doge' memes and found myself knee-deep in 'Numberphile' videos. Coincidence? I think not." Such anecdotal evidence, although not empirically rigorous, contributes to the anecdotal tapestry of digital experiences and the unexpected intersections within the online landscape.
As we traverse the literature landscape, it becomes evident that the connection between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' entails a nuanced and multifaceted inquiry. While the scholarly discourse offers insightful research, the inclusion of more whimsical and informal sources enriches the understanding of the peculiar interplay between internet memes and mathematical musings. Moving forward, the synthesis of these diverse perspectives will prove invaluable in unraveling the riddle of their intriguing correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. The correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and an r-squared value of 0.7516040 attest to the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscores the statistical significance of this connection, providing compelling evidence that the rise of the 'doge' meme and the curiosity for numerical musings in 'Numberphile' are intertwined in the digital landscape.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between the popularity of the 'doge' meme and the Google search interest for 'Numberphile'. It is evident from the figure that as the 'doge' meme gained traction over the years, there was a corresponding increase in the search interest for 'Numberphile', portraying a curiously synchronized trend in the online sphere.
As we reflect on these findings, it becomes apparent that the intersection of internet memes and mathematical inquiries offers a compelling narrative of the interplay between popular culture and intellectual curiosity. While our investigation succeeded in unearthing a strong statistical link between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, it also raises tantalizing questions about the deeper motivations driving digital trends. This begs the amusing question: are we truly barking up the right tree with these correlations, or are we simply chasing our tails in the captivating expanse of meme-centric mathematics? These findings not only enrich our understanding of online phenomena but also tantalizingly leave us pondering the paw-sibilities of further explorations at the crossroads of internet culture and numerical musings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation present a compelling tale of the intertwining paths of two seemingly incongruous online phenomena: the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' Google searches. These findings bolster the previous research conducted by Smith et al. (2017) and Doe and Jones (2018), who hinted at the potential correlations between internet memes and mathematical curiosities. Encompassing a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study not only affirms but amplifies the magnitude of this connection, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between canine internet humor and numerical inquiries.

As we reflect on the literature review, it is clear that our study embraces the whimsical and informal perspectives embedded within the broader discourse, echoing the sentiments of "The Mathematics of Love" by Fry (2015) and "Memes: A Comprehensive Guide" by Hilarious (2020). Leveraging this nuanced approach, our investigation not only validates the scholarly discourse but also invokes a lighthearted twist in unraveling the enigmatic correlation between meme culture and mathematical whimsy. This duality allows for a richer understanding of the peculiar interplay between online trends and the idiosyncrasies of digital behavior.

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 elucidates the synchronized trend between the 'doge' meme's rise and the surge in 'Numberphile' searches, showcasing a paw-sitively intriguing pattern in the digital landscape. These results not only affirm our initial hypothesis but also beckon forth a whimsical musing: Are we witnessing a digital symphony of barks and numbers, or are we merely chasing our tails in the ever-captivating world of meme-centric mathematics?

In summary, our study's findings substantiate the captivating correlation between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, shedding light on the unanticipated intersections within the online realm. Embracing both the scholarly and the playful, our investigation fosters a holistic understanding of the intricate web of internet culture and mathematical musings, leaving us with a lingering chuckle and a wag of scientific intrigue as we embark on future explorations at this unique crossroads.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'doge' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast and enigmatic realm of the internet, memes and mathematical curiosities often collide in unexpected ways, leading to an intriguing confluence of popular culture and intellectual pursuits. The 'doge' meme, characterized by its shiba inu protagonist and expressive comic sans captions, has wagged its way into the hearts and screens of netizens across the globe. Simultaneously, 'Numberphile', a platform dedicated to elucidating the fascinating intricacies of numbers and mathematics, has garnered its own following of inquisitive minds seeking numerical enlightenment.
In this study, we embark on an expedition to uncover the mysterious relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. While one may assume that the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' have as much in common as a steak and a squeaky toy, our research endeavors to unearth any underlying correlations. Through the utilization of Google Trends data, we aim to leash our understanding of the interplay between the howl-inducing popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in numerical musings of 'Numberphile'.
In this pursuit, we adhere to a rigorous analytical framework to avoid any accidental barking up the wrong tree. With a statistically intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01 howling in the background, our findings unearth a strong statistical link between the aforementioned entities, as if they were playing an intriguing game of "fetch" in the digital expanse. As we delve deeper into the results, we must ponder whether our discerning correlations are indeed leading us to the buried bones of truth or if we are merely chasing our tails in the boundless backyard of internet memes and mathematical curiosities.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation between the popularity of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. The correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and an r-squared value of 0.7516040 attest to the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscores the statistical significance of this connection, providing compelling evidence that the rise of the 'doge' meme and the curiosity for numerical musings in 'Numberphile' are intertwined in the digital landscape.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between the popularity of the 'doge' meme and the Google search interest for 'Numberphile'. It is evident from the figure that as the 'doge' meme gained traction over the years, there was a corresponding increase in the search interest for 'Numberphile', portraying a curiously synchronized trend in the online sphere.
As we reflect on these findings, it becomes apparent that the intersection of internet memes and mathematical inquiries offers a compelling narrative of the interplay between popular culture and intellectual curiosity. While our investigation succeeded in unearthing a strong statistical link between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, it also raises tantalizing questions about the deeper motivations driving digital trends. This begs the amusing question: are we truly barking up the right tree with these correlations, or are we simply chasing our tails in the captivating expanse of meme-centric mathematics? These findings not only enrich our understanding of online phenomena but also tantalizingly leave us pondering the paw-sibilities of further explorations at the crossroads of internet culture and numerical musings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unearthed a compelling correlation between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value provide robust evidence of the entwined nature of these seemingly disparate phenomena, as if they were colluding in a game of digital hide-and-seek.

However, as we wag our tails in celebration of these findings, we are left pondering whether we are truly barking up the right tree with these correlations, or if we are merely chasing our tails in the captivating expanse of meme-centric mathematics. Are these correlations howling at the moon with mathematical precision, or are we merely dancing to the tune of a shiba inu's whims? The intricacies of human behavior in the digital age continue to pose as many head-scratching puzzles as a tangled ball of yarn.

Ultimately, our findings not only fetch interesting insights but also raise the question of whether these correlations are leading us to the buried bones of truth or if we are merely engaging in a digital game of "fetch". As the data seems to suggest a strong link between the 'doge' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, it seems there is no need for further research in this area. We have dug up the statistical bones, and it's time to pause and reflect before we bury ourselves in more data than we can wag our tails at.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Memetics and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Memetic Studies and Internet Culture Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pawsitively Trending: The Howl Relationship between 'Doge' Meme Popularity and 'Numberphile' Google Searches with an abstract of In this research study, we unravel the connection between the meteoric rise of the 'doge' meme and the search interest in 'Numberphile' on the Google platform. Utilizing data from Google Trends, our team embarked on a rigorous analysis to sniff out any potential correlations. The results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8669510 and p < 0.01, showcasing a strong statistical link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, our findings underscore the intriguing interplay between internet memes and mathematical curiosities, shedding light on the unpredictable paths of online trends and the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age. Our study not only fetches interesting insights but also raises the question: Are these correlations barking up the right tree or are we simply chasing our tails in the world of meme and mathematics?

ChatGPT:

'doge' meme, 'Numberphile' Google searches, Google Trends, internet memes, mathematical curiosities, online trends, human behavior, digital age, correlation coefficient, statistical link, meme and mathematics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'doge' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'doge meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'doge' meme

Google searches for 'Numberphile'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Numberphile' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Numberphile'

Correlation r = 0.8669510 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7516040 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Numberphile') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'doge' meme) over the 17 years from 2007 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.7E-6. 0.0000066702597141249980000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.00067% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 149,919 random variables You don't actually need 149 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'doge' meme (Relative popularity)0.2857140.1666670.44444400026.777830.416716.91671713.58339.41667910.583314.08337.56.58333
Google searches for 'Numberphile' (Rel. search volume)2.416671.250.91666700.521.54663.416757.548.548.16673637.916729.333316.583317.833312.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.285714,0.166667,0.444444,0,0,0,26.7778,30.4167,16.9167,17,13.5833,9.41667,9,10.5833,14.0833,7.5,6.58333,])
array_2 = np.array([2.41667,1.25,0.916667,0,0.5,21.5,46,63.4167,57.5,48.5,48.1667,36,37.9167,29.3333,16.5833,17.8333,12.25,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'doge' meme"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Numberphile'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5576 · Black Variable ID: 25113 · Red Variable ID: 1458
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0