about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,615 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Washington and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to move to europe'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The theory that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em has taken an unexpected turn with Republicans in Washington voting for Senators. As the political landscape shifts, so does the mindset of residents, leading to a sudden surge in interest in relocating to Europe. Perhaps it's a quest for new perspectives or just a longing for a more 'continental' approach to life. Looks like the Emerald City might be losing its luster for some!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling city scene with a twist. Render a line of people standing outside a grand building adorned with "Republican Senators Voting" banners. Across the street, a row of modern laptops glow in a cozy coffee shop, each displaying Google search pages for "how to move to Europe." A mixture of curious glances and knowing looks are exchanged between the people in line and the laptop users. The city skyline looms in the background, symbolizing the changing perspectives and desires of its inhabitants. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Republican Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Cutsy art illustration Cubism a funny image macro Steampunk
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Republican Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe', in the following situation: The theory that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em has taken an unexpected turn with Republicans in Washington voting for Senators. As the political landscape shifts, so does the mindset of residents, leading to a sudden surge in interest in relocating to Europe. Perhaps it's a quest for new perspectives or just a longing for a more 'continental' approach to life. Looks like the Emerald City might be losing its luster for some!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, a line of people stands outside a grand building with "Republican Senators Voting" banners hung high. On the other side of the street, a row of modern laptops glow in a cozy coffee shop, each displaying Google search pages for "how to move to Europe." The people in line glance curiously at the laptop users, while some laptop users exchange knowing looks as they sip their drinks. The city skyline looms in the background, hinting at the shifting perspectives and desires of its inhabitants.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, a line of people stands outside a grand building with "Republican Senators Voting" banners hung high. On the other side of the street, a row of modern laptops glow in a cozy coffee shop, each displaying Google search pages for "how to move to Europe." The people in line glance curiously at the laptop users, while some laptop users exchange knowing looks as they sip their drinks. The city skyline looms in the background, hinting at the shifting perspectives and desires of its inhabitants. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling city scene with a twist. Render a line of people standing outside a grand building adorned with "Republican Senators Voting" banners. Across the street, a row of modern laptops glow in a cozy coffee shop, each displaying Google search pages for "how to move to Europe." A mixture of curious glances and knowing looks are exchanged between the people in line and the laptop users. The city skyline looms in the background, symbolizing the changing perspectives and desires of its inhabitants.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Republican votes for Senators in Washington positively influenced how to move to europe (Google searches for 'how to move to europe'). Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

The Journal of Political Irony

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Politics and international escapades may seem like an odd couple, but as they say, opposites attract! In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the world of statistical correlation, where Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' converge in a surprising tango of data. It's like a political comedy sketch meets a travel documentary - Donald Trump and Anthony Bourdain, anyone?

As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into weighty matters such as economic trends and public health policies. But every now and then, a peculiar association emerges from the labyrinth of data, and we can't help but do a double-take. Enter our unexpected discovery: the juxtaposition of conservative political leanings in the Evergreen State with the earnest inquiries of citizens pondering a transatlantic relocation. It's like witnessing a silent film star attending a heavy metal concert - intriguing, amusing, and a bit perplexing all at once.

While the link between casting a Republican ballot and dreaming of European adventures may incite a chuckle or two, our findings are no laughing matter when it comes to statistical significance. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value that gleefully dances below the 0.01 threshold, this peculiar union between political preference and wanderlust demands our attention. Frankly, it's a statistical odd couple that even Shakespeare couldn't have scripted.

This study transcends the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry and embraces the marriage of political science and levity. We invite our readers to join us in this intellectual romp, where numbers and humor intertwine to unravel the peculiar motivations behind certain voting demographics. So, buckle up and grab your passport - it's time for a statistical exploration that's more intriguing than a Choose Your Own Adventure book!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and international escapades may seem like an odd couple, but as they say, opposites attract! In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the world of statistical correlation, where Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' converge in a surprising tango of data. It's like a political comedy sketch meets a travel documentary - Donald Trump and Anthony Bourdain, anyone?
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into weighty matters such as economic trends and public health policies. But every now and then, a peculiar association emerges from the labyrinth of data, and we can't help but do a double-take. Enter our unexpected discovery: the juxtaposition of conservative political leanings in the Evergreen State with the earnest inquiries of citizens pondering a transatlantic relocation. It's like witnessing a silent film star attending a heavy metal concert - intriguing, amusing, and a bit perplexing all at once.
While the link between casting a Republican ballot and dreaming of European adventures may incite a chuckle or two, our findings are no laughing matter when it comes to statistical significance. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value that gleefully dances below the 0.01 threshold, this peculiar union between political preference and wanderlust demands our attention. Frankly, it's a statistical odd couple that even Shakespeare couldn't have scripted.
This study transcends the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry and embraces the marriage of political science and levity. We invite our readers to join us in this intellectual romp, where numbers and humor intertwine to unravel the peculiar motivations behind certain voting demographics. So, buckle up and grab your passport - it's time for a statistical exploration that's more intriguing than a Choose Your Own Adventure book!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The unexpected marriage of political ideologies and aspirations for transcontinental relocation has garnered attention from researchers and analysts across diverse fields. Starting with the conventional bounds of statistical analysis, Smith et al. (2010) unearthed an intriguing pattern in the state of Washington, where Republican votes for Senators seemed to evoke a stirring curiosity about the logistics of settling in Europe. The authors proposed that perhaps the allure of picturesque landscapes and centuries-old architecture tickled a chord among a certain segment of the electorate, prompting them to explore greener pastures, both literally and figuratively. However, this perplexing correlation left some scratching their heads, akin to a cryptic crossword puzzle in the Sunday newspaper.

As our investigation ventures further into the uncharted waters of voter behavior, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the psychological underpinnings of political affiliation and aspirations for international relocation. Their study ventured into the realm of cultural identity and the yearning for new horizons, postulating that the quest for change and adventure intertwines with one's voting inclinations in ways that transcend traditional political discourse. The fusion of political science and wanderlust resembles a whimsical fusion of flavors in a culinary experiment, where unexpected combinations yield delightful surprises.

Venturing beyond the confines of scholarly literature, we must consider the influence of non-fiction works that shed light on the complexities of international migration and the American political landscape. "The Age of Migration" by Castles and Miller (2013) and "American Nations" by Woodard (2011) provide invaluable insights into the cultural, economic, and historical forces that shape individuals' aspirations for global mobility and their political affiliations. As one delves deeper into these tomes, it becomes evident that the intersection of political identity and the yearning for distant shores has roots that extend far beyond the confines of election booths and internet search queries.

Transitioning to a more whimsical realm, works of fiction offer a fantastical lens through which to contemplate the improbable convergence of Republican votes and dreams of European sojourns. Imaginative narratives such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Eat, Pray, Love" by Elizabeth Gilbert beckon readers to ponder the whimsical interplay of human desires, cosmic absurdity, and the pursuit of self-discovery. These literary escapades, much like our research, invite us to embrace the unexpected and relish in the delightful quirks of human nature.

Furthermore, our pursuit of understanding the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes in Washington and aspirations to relocate to Europe has also led us down the unexpected path of televised entertainment. TV shows such as "House Hunters International" and "Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown" afford audiences a tantalizing glimpse into the allure of far-flung destinations and the diverse motivations that drive individuals to seek new beginnings beyond their familiar environs. These cultural phenomena offer a ripe landscape for observations that parallel our research findings, weaving together themes of discovery, curiosity, and the eternal quest for adventure.

In synthesizing the breadth of scholarly inquiries, literary imaginings, and cultural artifacts, it becomes evident that the intersection of political inclinations and dreams of international odysseys presents a landscape teeming with unexpected absurdities and thought-provoking insights. Our research seeks to add a whimsical flourish to the stoic tapestry of statistical analysis, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to revel in the delightful mysteries that unfold at the nexus of political choices and the lure of distant shores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and international escapades may seem like an odd couple, but as they say, opposites attract! In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the world of statistical correlation, where Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' converge in a surprising tango of data. It's like a political comedy sketch meets a travel documentary - Donald Trump and Anthony Bourdain, anyone?
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into weighty matters such as economic trends and public health policies. But every now and then, a peculiar association emerges from the labyrinth of data, and we can't help but do a double-take. Enter our unexpected discovery: the juxtaposition of conservative political leanings in the Evergreen State with the earnest inquiries of citizens pondering a transatlantic relocation. It's like witnessing a silent film star attending a heavy metal concert - intriguing, amusing, and a bit perplexing all at once.
While the link between casting a Republican ballot and dreaming of European adventures may incite a chuckle or two, our findings are no laughing matter when it comes to statistical significance. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value that gleefully dances below the 0.01 threshold, this peculiar union between political preference and wanderlust demands our attention. Frankly, it's a statistical odd couple that even Shakespeare couldn't have scripted.
This study transcends the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry and embraces the marriage of political science and levity. We invite our readers to join us in this intellectual romp, where numbers and humor intertwine to unravel the peculiar motivations behind certain voting demographics. So, buckle up and grab your passport - it's time for a statistical exploration that's more intriguing than a Choose Your Own Adventure book!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic knot between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and the fervent Google searches for 'how to move to Europe,' we embarked on a convoluted yet exhilarating journey akin to attempting to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded while riding a unicycle. Our team utilized data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, ensuring we had a smorgasbord of information at our disposal, with a pinch of 'je ne sais quoi' thrown in for good measure.

First, we waded through the sea of internet data like intrepid explorers navigating the Amazon, gathering and harmonizing Senate election results from 2004 to 2018 with the corresponding search volumes for 'how to move to Europe' on Google. It was like sifting through a treasure trove of statistical artifacts in search of the fabled correlations and causations that had eluded researchers for eons.

Next, we donned our metaphorical deerstalkers and put our Sherlock Holmes hats on to harness the power of correlation analysis. We employed the Pearson correlation coefficient, or as we fondly referred to it, the "statistical cupid," to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between Republican votes and European relocation yearnings. It was as if we were matchmakers between political inclinations and dreams of al fresco dining in the City of Light.

Furthermore, we wielded the mighty p-value, that elusive benchmark of statistical significance, with the finesse of a skilled magician unveiling a well-kept secret. Our decision to use a p-value threshold of less than 0.01 was not arbitrary; we wanted to make sure our findings were as robust as a fortified castle in medieval Europe, standing strong against any statistical siege.

Finally, by applying time series analysis, we captured the ebbs and flows of Republican votes and 'how to move to Europe' searches over the years, revealing the dynamic nature of this curious relationship. It was like observing the tango between political ideology and cosmopolitan yearnings evolve over time, with all the dramatic flair of a soap opera and the unpredictability of a reality TV show.

In sum, our methodology was a daring and dizzying escapade, akin to untangling a kite string in a windstorm with statistical rigor as our guiding star. We embraced the chaos of the digital landscape, navigating through the labyrinth of data with the zeal of adventurers in search of statistical treasure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9419446, r-squared of 0.8872596, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Politics and international escapades may seem like an odd couple, but as they say, opposites attract! In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the world of statistical correlation, where Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' converge in a surprising tango of data. It's like a political comedy sketch meets a travel documentary - Donald Trump and Anthony Bourdain, anyone?
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into weighty matters such as economic trends and public health policies. But every now and then, a peculiar association emerges from the labyrinth of data, and we can't help but do a double-take. Enter our unexpected discovery: the juxtaposition of conservative political leanings in the Evergreen State with the earnest inquiries of citizens pondering a transatlantic relocation. It's like witnessing a silent film star attending a heavy metal concert - intriguing, amusing, and a bit perplexing all at once.
While the link between casting a Republican ballot and dreaming of European adventures may incite a chuckle or two, our findings are no laughing matter when it comes to statistical significance. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value that gleefully dances below the 0.01 threshold, this peculiar union between political preference and wanderlust demands our attention. Frankly, it's a statistical odd couple that even Shakespeare couldn't have scripted.
This study transcends the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry and embraces the marriage of political science and levity. We invite our readers to join us in this intellectual romp, where numbers and humor intertwine to unravel the peculiar motivations behind certain voting demographics. So, buckle up and grab your passport - it's time for a statistical exploration that's more intriguing than a Choose Your Own Adventure book!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018 yielded some truly titillating results. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446, an r-squared of 0.8872596, and a p-value that excitedly skipped beneath the 0.01 threshold, we found a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.

Figure 1 beautifully encapsulates the saga of this unlikely duo, depicting a scatterplot that unequivocally showcases the strong positive correlation between Republican votes and the yearning to cross the pond. The data points on this graph are like two peas in a pod, or should we say, two politicos in a plane?

It's like catching a conservative politician trading their dress shoes for hiking boots, ready to embark on an adventure that even Lewis and Clark would envy. This correlation is perhaps as bizarre as finding a cheeseburger in a French patisserie - both delightful and confounding in equal measure.

In summary, our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between political inclinations and the desire to relocate to the sweeping landscapes and cultural marvels of Europe. This remarkably strong correlation invites further exploration into the whims and fancies of electoral dynamics that may leave political pundits scratching their heads and contemplating their own relocation plans. The quirky union of political preferences and wanderlust is certainly a spectacle worthy of further investigation and, dare we say, a healthy dose of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The unexpected marriage of political ideologies and aspirations for transcontinental relocation has garnered attention from researchers and analysts across diverse fields. Starting with the conventional bounds of statistical analysis, Smith et al. (2010) unearthed an intriguing pattern in the state of Washington, where Republican votes for Senators seemed to evoke a stirring curiosity about the logistics of settling in Europe. The authors proposed that perhaps the allure of picturesque landscapes and centuries-old architecture tickled a chord among a certain segment of the electorate, prompting them to explore greener pastures, both literally and figuratively. However, this perplexing correlation left some scratching their heads, akin to a cryptic crossword puzzle in the Sunday newspaper.
As our investigation ventures further into the uncharted waters of voter behavior, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the psychological underpinnings of political affiliation and aspirations for international relocation. Their study ventured into the realm of cultural identity and the yearning for new horizons, postulating that the quest for change and adventure intertwines with one's voting inclinations in ways that transcend traditional political discourse. The fusion of political science and wanderlust resembles a whimsical fusion of flavors in a culinary experiment, where unexpected combinations yield delightful surprises.
Venturing beyond the confines of scholarly literature, we must consider the influence of non-fiction works that shed light on the complexities of international migration and the American political landscape. "The Age of Migration" by Castles and Miller (2013) and "American Nations" by Woodard (2011) provide invaluable insights into the cultural, economic, and historical forces that shape individuals' aspirations for global mobility and their political affiliations. As one delves deeper into these tomes, it becomes evident that the intersection of political identity and the yearning for distant shores has roots that extend far beyond the confines of election booths and internet search queries.
Transitioning to a more whimsical realm, works of fiction offer a fantastical lens through which to contemplate the improbable convergence of Republican votes and dreams of European sojourns. Imaginative narratives such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Eat, Pray, Love" by Elizabeth Gilbert beckon readers to ponder the whimsical interplay of human desires, cosmic absurdity, and the pursuit of self-discovery. These literary escapades, much like our research, invite us to embrace the unexpected and relish in the delightful quirks of human nature.
Furthermore, our pursuit of understanding the enigmatic relationship between Republican votes in Washington and aspirations to relocate to Europe has also led us down the unexpected path of televised entertainment. TV shows such as "House Hunters International" and "Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown" afford audiences a tantalizing glimpse into the allure of far-flung destinations and the diverse motivations that drive individuals to seek new beginnings beyond their familiar environs. These cultural phenomena offer a ripe landscape for observations that parallel our research findings, weaving together themes of discovery, curiosity, and the eternal quest for adventure.
In synthesizing the breadth of scholarly inquiries, literary imaginings, and cultural artifacts, it becomes evident that the intersection of political inclinations and dreams of international odysseys presents a landscape teeming with unexpected absurdities and thought-provoking insights. Our research seeks to add a whimsical flourish to the stoic tapestry of statistical analysis, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to revel in the delightful mysteries that unfold at the nexus of political choices and the lure of distant shores.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018 yielded some truly titillating results. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446, an r-squared of 0.8872596, and a p-value that excitedly skipped beneath the 0.01 threshold, we found a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Figure 1 beautifully encapsulates the saga of this unlikely duo, depicting a scatterplot that unequivocally showcases the strong positive correlation between Republican votes and the yearning to cross the pond. The data points on this graph are like two peas in a pod, or should we say, two politicos in a plane?
It's like catching a conservative politician trading their dress shoes for hiking boots, ready to embark on an adventure that even Lewis and Clark would envy. This correlation is perhaps as bizarre as finding a cheeseburger in a French patisserie - both delightful and confounding in equal measure.
In summary, our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between political inclinations and the desire to relocate to the sweeping landscapes and cultural marvels of Europe. This remarkably strong correlation invites further exploration into the whims and fancies of electoral dynamics that may leave political pundits scratching their heads and contemplating their own relocation plans. The quirky union of political preferences and wanderlust is certainly a spectacle worthy of further investigation and, dare we say, a healthy dose of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have unveiled a correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' that is as strong as the allure of a fresh croissant. Our findings support the prior research that hinted at the enigmatic relationship between political preferences and the yearning for international relocation.

Smith et al.'s (2010) earlier work, which highlighted the eyebrow-raising pattern of Republican votes sparking an interest in European escapades, now appears to be more than just a whimsical flight of fancy. It seems that the allure of European cobblestone streets and perhaps the faint aroma of freshly baked baguettes have resonated with a certain segment of the electorate, prompting them to seek out the logistical details of embarking on an Old World adventure. As our findings mirror the pattern observed by Smith et al., it becomes clear that there is a peculiar dance between political inclinations and the siren call of unfamiliar horizons.

Doe and Jones (2015) tapped into the psychological undercurrents of political affiliation and dreams of international odysseys, proposing that the desire for change and adventure intertwines with voting proclivities in surprising ways. Our results add weight to their proposition, suggesting that the fusion of political allegiance and wanderlust is not merely a flight of fancy but a statistically significant phenomenon worth further exploration. It's as if political ideology and the allure of far-off lands have collided in a ballet of bewildering serendipity, leaving us both bemused and invigorated by the unexpected unity.

Our findings have provided empirical support for a proposition that may once have seemed as improbable as stumbling upon an American diner in the heart of Paris. The statistically significant relationship we've uncovered invites us to contemplate the mysterious interplay of political preferences and the yearning for European sojourns. It's akin to a political comedy show, where the audience is left scratching their heads and chuckling in equal measure at the delightful absurdity of it all.

In conclusion, our research has shone a quirky spotlight on the unexpected intersection of political choices and dreams of European escapades. This unlikely pairing, like a lighthearted plot twist in a romantic comedy, beckons us to explore the colorful tapestry of human desires and electoral dynamics. Our findings set the stage for further investigation into this whimsical interplay, providing scholars and enthusiasts with a playful enigma to unravel and, perhaps, a dash of levity in the otherwise serious world of political analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to europe'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Politics and international escapades may seem like an odd couple, but as they say, opposites attract! In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the world of statistical correlation, where Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' converge in a surprising tango of data. It's like a political comedy sketch meets a travel documentary - Donald Trump and Anthony Bourdain, anyone?
As researchers, we are accustomed to delving into weighty matters such as economic trends and public health policies. But every now and then, a peculiar association emerges from the labyrinth of data, and we can't help but do a double-take. Enter our unexpected discovery: the juxtaposition of conservative political leanings in the Evergreen State with the earnest inquiries of citizens pondering a transatlantic relocation. It's like witnessing a silent film star attending a heavy metal concert - intriguing, amusing, and a bit perplexing all at once.
While the link between casting a Republican ballot and dreaming of European adventures may incite a chuckle or two, our findings are no laughing matter when it comes to statistical significance. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value that gleefully dances below the 0.01 threshold, this peculiar union between political preference and wanderlust demands our attention. Frankly, it's a statistical odd couple that even Shakespeare couldn't have scripted.
This study transcends the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry and embraces the marriage of political science and levity. We invite our readers to join us in this intellectual romp, where numbers and humor intertwine to unravel the peculiar motivations behind certain voting demographics. So, buckle up and grab your passport - it's time for a statistical exploration that's more intriguing than a Choose Your Own Adventure book!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018 yielded some truly titillating results. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9419446, an r-squared of 0.8872596, and a p-value that excitedly skipped beneath the 0.01 threshold, we found a connection that is as intriguing as it is unexpected.
Figure 1 beautifully encapsulates the saga of this unlikely duo, depicting a scatterplot that unequivocally showcases the strong positive correlation between Republican votes and the yearning to cross the pond. The data points on this graph are like two peas in a pod, or should we say, two politicos in a plane?
It's like catching a conservative politician trading their dress shoes for hiking boots, ready to embark on an adventure that even Lewis and Clark would envy. This correlation is perhaps as bizarre as finding a cheeseburger in a French patisserie - both delightful and confounding in equal measure.
In summary, our findings reveal a statistically significant relationship between political inclinations and the desire to relocate to the sweeping landscapes and cultural marvels of Europe. This remarkably strong correlation invites further exploration into the whims and fancies of electoral dynamics that may leave political pundits scratching their heads and contemplating their own relocation plans. The quirky union of political preferences and wanderlust is certainly a spectacle worthy of further investigation and, dare we say, a healthy dose of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' that is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza. Our statistically significant findings have opened the door to a whole new world of political analysis, one where red states may be yearning for the blue waters of the Mediterranean.

This peculiar connection has undoubtedly raised more eyebrows than a surprise party at an eyebrow waxing salon. We can't help but wonder what Abe Lincoln, known for his top hat and no-nonsense attitude, would have to say about this penchant for European daydreams among his party's supporters.

Our study has not only shed light on the quirky intersection of political preference and wanderlust but has also evoked a fair share of laughter and incredulous looks. After all, it's not every day that statistics prompt visions of American expats strolling through cobblestone streets with a copy of the Constitution in hand.

However, while our findings may elicit a chuckle or two, they also offer a refreshing perspective on the complex tapestry of human motivations and aspirations. Perhaps this correlation is not as random as finding a kangaroo in a tulip field; instead, it reflects the intricate dance between political identity and the allure of new horizons.

In light of these revelations, it is tempting to call for further investigation into other curious connections, such as the link between Democratic votes and dreaming of lunar colonization. However, we must resist the siren call of statistical mischief and recognize that our study has plucked the low-hanging fruit of statistical oddities.

Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings stand as a testament to the quirky, whimsical nature of statistical analysis and offer a delightful diversion from the gravitas of traditional political inquiry. So, let us bid adieu to this unusual correlation and turn our attention to endeavors that are as unpredictable as a pogo stick in a library - but perhaps a tad more practical.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Irony


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Political Punditry and Internet Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Red, the White, and the Queasy: Republican Votes in Washington and Google Searches for 'How to Move to Europe' with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Washington and Google searches for 'how to move to Europe' from 2004 to 2018. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9419446 and a p-value less than 0.01. While the connection between political affiliation and international relocation plans may seem frivolous, our findings reveal a statistically significant link that tickles the funny bone. These results offer a quirky insight into the underlying motivations of certain voting demographics and may stimulate a colorful exchange of puns and jests among political analysts and comedians alike.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, Washington State, Google searches, move to Europe, political affiliation, international relocation, voter motivations, correlation coefficient, p-value, political demographics, voting patterns, election data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Washington
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Washington
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Washington

Google searches for 'how to move to europe'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to move to europe' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to move to europe'

Correlation r = 0.9419446 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8872596 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to move to europe') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Washington) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.005. 0.0049578110568088175000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 202 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420062010201220162018
Votes for Republican Senators in Washington (Total votes)12045808321061196160121392013293401282800
Google searches for 'how to move to europe' (Rel. search volume)20.91676.8333321.583325.166732.333334.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1204580,832106,1196160,1213920,1329340,1282800,])
array_2 = np.array([20.9167,6.83333,21.5833,25.1667,32.3333,34.25,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Washington"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to move to europe'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 5615 · Black Variable ID: 26332 · Red Variable ID: 1493
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0