Download png, svg
AI explanation
The increase in hurricanes led to more historical events, which in turn expanded the content of Extra History videos to include these stormy tales. After all, they had to cover every wind-swept moment!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a realistic image of stormy clouds gathering over the Atlantic Ocean with a trail of hurricanes visible on the horizon. In the foreground, depict a group of historians huddled around a video editing station, diligently creating Extra History episodes. The videos displayed on the screens are longer than usual, with titles like "The Tempestuous Tales of Atlantic Hurricanes" prominently shown. The historians are excitedly adding stormy animations and historical context to the videos, reflecting the increasing impact of hurricanes on historical events. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Realistic 3D Pixar Style Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Realistic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos, in the following situation: The increase in hurricanes led to more historical events, which in turn expanded the content of Extra History videos to include these stormy tales. After all, they had to cover every wind-swept moment!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, stormy clouds gather over the Atlantic Ocean, with a trail of hurricanes visible on the horizon. Amidst the tumultuous weather, a group of historians huddle around a video editing station, diligently creating Extra History episodes. The videos themselves are longer than usual, with titles like "The Tempestuous Tales of Atlantic Hurricanes" prominently displayed on the screens. The historians are excitedly adding stormy animations and historical context to the videos, reflecting the increasing impact of hurricanes on historical events.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, stormy clouds gather over the Atlantic Ocean, with a trail of hurricanes visible on the horizon. Amidst the tumultuous weather, a group of historians huddle around a video editing station, diligently creating Extra History episodes. The videos themselves are longer than usual, with titles like "The Tempestuous Tales of Atlantic Hurricanes" prominently displayed on the screens. The historians are excitedly adding stormy animations and historical context to the videos, reflecting the increasing impact of hurricanes on historical events. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a realistic image of stormy clouds gathering over the Atlantic Ocean with a trail of hurricanes visible on the horizon. In the foreground, depict a group of historians huddled around a video editing station, diligently creating Extra History episodes. The videos displayed on the screens are longer than usual, with titles like "The Tempestuous Tales of Atlantic Hurricanes" prominently shown. The historians are excitedly adding stormy animations and historical context to the videos, reflecting the increasing impact of hurricanes on historical events.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year caused Average length of Extra History YouTube videos to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length The Journal of Weather and Wacky Research Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Wikipedia and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9837230 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research. In this spirit, we embarked on an investigation that combines the turbulent world of Atlantic hurricanes with the captivating realm of Extra History YouTube videos. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as a hurricane in a teacup, our research has unearthed a surprising connection between the two.
As the winds of curiosity swept us up, we found ourselves pondering the possibility of a correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. This unconventional pairing of subjects led to the discovery of a remarkably strong association, displaying a compelling synergy that neither the meteorological nor educational communities could have foreseen.
Our pursuit of this unusual correlation was not without its challenges. We encountered skeptics who questioned the merit of our investigation, expressing doubts as though we were attempting to compare apples and oranges. However, undeterred by the storm of raised eyebrows, we pressed forward, armed with statistical analysis and a good sense of humor. In the eye of this scientific tempest, we weathered the doubters and emerged with findings that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.
Without a doubt, the journey to uncover the link between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length has been one filled with unexpected twists and turns. As we navigate through the following sections, we will dive into the data, exploring the methodologies employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this unlikely correlation. Prepare for a whirlwind of analysis and insight, as we unravel the stormy connection between weather patterns and video durations, shedding light on a phenomenon as unpredictable as the winds themselves.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research. In this spirit, we embarked on an investigation that combines the turbulent world of Atlantic hurricanes with the captivating realm of Extra History YouTube videos. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as a hurricane in a teacup, our research has unearthed a surprising connection between the two.
As the winds of curiosity swept us up, we found ourselves pondering the possibility of a correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. This unconventional pairing of subjects led to the discovery of a remarkably strong association, displaying a compelling synergy that neither the meteorological nor educational communities could have foreseen.
Our pursuit of this unusual correlation was not without its challenges. We encountered skeptics who questioned the merit of our investigation, expressing doubts as though we were attempting to compare apples and oranges. However, undeterred by the storm of raised eyebrows, we pressed forward, armed with statistical analysis and a good sense of humor. In the eye of this scientific tempest, we weathered the doubters and emerged with findings that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.
Without a doubt, the journey to uncover the link between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length has been one filled with unexpected twists and turns. As we navigate through the following sections, we will dive into the data, exploring the methodologies employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this unlikely correlation. Prepare for a whirlwind of analysis and insight, as we unravel the stormy connection between weather patterns and video durations, shedding light on a phenomenon as unpredictable as the winds themselves.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research, encouraging scientists and scholars to seek unexpected connections and correlations in seemingly disparate domains. In this spirit, we delve into the literature to unravel the stormy correlation between Atlantic hurricanes and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos, a task that requires both a serious-minded approach and a willingness to weather the occasional pun.
Smith et al. (2015) undertook an extensive analysis of Atlantic hurricane patterns, examining historical data and atmospheric conditions to discern the complex interplay of meteorological factors. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) scrutinized the trends in video production and consumption, presenting a comprehensive overview of online educational content and the evolving landscape of digital media. Their rigorous studies form the anchor of our exploration, grounding our investigation in the realm of empirical research and methodological rigor. However, as we sail through the literature, we find ourselves encountering more than just scholarly works; the winds of inspiration also lead us to unexpected literary ports and fictional realms that whimsically align with our topic.
Turning our gaze towards non-fiction narratives, we encounter "The Storm of the Century" by Isaac Davis, an enthralling account of historical hurricanes that weaves together gripping tales of natural disasters with a keen eye for meteorological detail. In a similar vein, "Raging Waters: A History of Flooding" by Patricia Smith offers an insightful exploration of the tumultuous relationship between water and weather, shedding light on the broader context of environmental forces. These works, while not directly focusing on Atlantic hurricanes, provide valuable insights into the broader dynamics of weather-related phenomena, anchoring our understanding in the broader context of natural forces.
Reaching into the world of fiction, we stumble upon unexpected titles that tickle our fancy and surprisingly share thematic resonance with our research. "Whirlwind" by Clara Brooks immerses readers in a gripping tale of adventure and intrigue, where the forces of nature collide with the machinations of human ambition, offering a captivating seafaring narrative that resonates with the tempestuous spirit of our investigation. In a more whimsical vein, "The Winds of Change" by Gregory Green presents a fantastical tale of meteorological magic, where hurricanes harbor secret powers and unexpected connections, mirroring the mysterious link we seek to elucidate in our own study - albeit with a touch of enchantment and whimsy.
As we navigate these unexpected literary waters, we also cast our gaze towards childhood memories and the animated landscapes of our formative years. "Stormy the Weather Dog" and "The Adventures of Captain Hurricane" emerge as nostalgic touchstones, reminding us of the captivating allure of weather-related tales and heroic escapades, evoking the playful spirit of inquiry that has propelled us towards uncovering the unexpected connection between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length. Though these childhood favorites may not offer empirical data or scholarly critiques, they infuse our review with a spirit of lighthearted curiosity and the sheer joy of exploration, reminding us that even in the most serious of pursuits, there's always room for a dash of whimsy and wonder.
Enlivened by these unexpected encounters, we set our course towards the heart of our investigation, ready to unpack the whimsical yet profound correlation between weather patterns and video durations, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can yield illuminating insights and bring a gust of fresh perspective to the scientific landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research. In this spirit, we embarked on an investigation that combines the turbulent world of Atlantic hurricanes with the captivating realm of Extra History YouTube videos. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as a hurricane in a teacup, our research has unearthed a surprising connection between the two.
As the winds of curiosity swept us up, we found ourselves pondering the possibility of a correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. This unconventional pairing of subjects led to the discovery of a remarkably strong association, displaying a compelling synergy that neither the meteorological nor educational communities could have foreseen.
Our pursuit of this unusual correlation was not without its challenges. We encountered skeptics who questioned the merit of our investigation, expressing doubts as though we were attempting to compare apples and oranges. However, undeterred by the storm of raised eyebrows, we pressed forward, armed with statistical analysis and a good sense of humor. In the eye of this scientific tempest, we weathered the doubters and emerged with findings that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.
Without a doubt, the journey to uncover the link between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length has been one filled with unexpected twists and turns. As we navigate through the following sections, we will dive into the data, exploring the methodologies employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this unlikely correlation. Prepare for a whirlwind of analysis and insight, as we unravel the stormy connection between weather patterns and video durations, shedding light on a phenomenon as unpredictable as the winds themselves.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To quantify the relationship between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos, we employed a mix of rigorous data collection and some not-so-rigorous internet browsing. First and foremost, we scoured the sprawling expanse of Wikipedia, with its wealth of meteorological data and historical hurricane records. We utilized this information to compile an annual tally of Atlantic hurricanes, taking into account their intensity, duration, and wind speed, because we like our correlations to have a bit of "force" behind them.
Having secured the hurricane data, we donned our metaphorical raincoats and ventured into the digital domain of YouTube. With the precision of seasoned data hunters and the patience of saints, we trawled through countless Extra History videos, diligently noting their respective lengths. It was in this ocean of educational content that we uncovered the "hidden depths" of the average video duration, ensuring that our dataset was as comprehensive as possible.
Once armed with our troves of hurricane and video length data, we put our statistical prowess to the test. We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our analysis also included the computation of p-values and confidence intervals, lending due weight to the significance of our findings. After all, we know that a good statistical analysis can really "blow you away."
To account for the variability over time, we employed a time-series analysis, examining the fluctuations in both Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video lengths across the years 2012 to 2022. This allowed us to capture the nuances of these phenomena and paint a complete picture of the temporal dynamics at play. Our methodology was designed to weather the storm of skepticism and critique, ensuring that our conclusions stood firm against the gusts of statistical doubt.
In sum, our data collection and analysis methods were as robust and thorough as they were unconventional and spirited. With a dash of creativity, a sprinkle of statistical rigor, and a pinch of internet adventuring, we arrived at a methodology that not only captures the essence of our inquiry but also reflects the interdisciplinary spirit of our research pursuits. As we move on to unveil the results of our investigation, let us set sail into the heart of this correlation, armed with the knowledge that sometimes, the most unlikely connections can reveal the most extraordinary insights.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and YouTube .
For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9837230, r-squared of 0.9677109, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research. In this spirit, we embarked on an investigation that combines the turbulent world of Atlantic hurricanes with the captivating realm of Extra History YouTube videos. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as a hurricane in a teacup, our research has unearthed a surprising connection between the two.
As the winds of curiosity swept us up, we found ourselves pondering the possibility of a correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. This unconventional pairing of subjects led to the discovery of a remarkably strong association, displaying a compelling synergy that neither the meteorological nor educational communities could have foreseen.
Our pursuit of this unusual correlation was not without its challenges. We encountered skeptics who questioned the merit of our investigation, expressing doubts as though we were attempting to compare apples and oranges. However, undeterred by the storm of raised eyebrows, we pressed forward, armed with statistical analysis and a good sense of humor. In the eye of this scientific tempest, we weathered the doubters and emerged with findings that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.
Without a doubt, the journey to uncover the link between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length has been one filled with unexpected twists and turns. As we navigate through the following sections, we will dive into the data, exploring the methodologies employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this unlikely correlation. Prepare for a whirlwind of analysis and insight, as we unravel the stormy connection between weather patterns and video durations, shedding light on a phenomenon as unpredictable as the winds themselves.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our research revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated at 0.9677109, implying that 96.77% of the variability in video length can be explained by the variability in the number of hurricanes.
In line with these findings, the p-value associated with this correlation was less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of the relationship. This result indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by sheer chance is exceedingly low, akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of historical artifacts while digging for storm shelter supplies.
Importantly, as illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot showcases the pronounced linear trend between the variables, resembling a hurricane's path that is predictably unpredictable; much like the foreshadowing in an episode of Extra History.
These results not only highlight the unexpected correlation between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length but also underscore the value of exploring unconventional connections that transcend disciplinary boundaries. As we weather the storm of skepticism and unravel the tempestuous ties between disparate phenomena, the significance of these results becomes as clear as a weather map on a sunny day.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research, encouraging scientists and scholars to seek unexpected connections and correlations in seemingly disparate domains. In this spirit, we delve into the literature to unravel the stormy correlation between Atlantic hurricanes and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos, a task that requires both a serious-minded approach and a willingness to weather the occasional pun.
Smith et al. (2015) undertook an extensive analysis of Atlantic hurricane patterns, examining historical data and atmospheric conditions to discern the complex interplay of meteorological factors. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) scrutinized the trends in video production and consumption, presenting a comprehensive overview of online educational content and the evolving landscape of digital media. Their rigorous studies form the anchor of our exploration, grounding our investigation in the realm of empirical research and methodological rigor. However, as we sail through the literature, we find ourselves encountering more than just scholarly works; the winds of inspiration also lead us to unexpected literary ports and fictional realms that whimsically align with our topic.
Turning our gaze towards non-fiction narratives, we encounter "The Storm of the Century" by Isaac Davis, an enthralling account of historical hurricanes that weaves together gripping tales of natural disasters with a keen eye for meteorological detail. In a similar vein, "Raging Waters: A History of Flooding" by Patricia Smith offers an insightful exploration of the tumultuous relationship between water and weather, shedding light on the broader context of environmental forces. These works, while not directly focusing on Atlantic hurricanes, provide valuable insights into the broader dynamics of weather-related phenomena, anchoring our understanding in the broader context of natural forces.
Reaching into the world of fiction, we stumble upon unexpected titles that tickle our fancy and surprisingly share thematic resonance with our research. "Whirlwind" by Clara Brooks immerses readers in a gripping tale of adventure and intrigue, where the forces of nature collide with the machinations of human ambition, offering a captivating seafaring narrative that resonates with the tempestuous spirit of our investigation. In a more whimsical vein, "The Winds of Change" by Gregory Green presents a fantastical tale of meteorological magic, where hurricanes harbor secret powers and unexpected connections, mirroring the mysterious link we seek to elucidate in our own study - albeit with a touch of enchantment and whimsy.
As we navigate these unexpected literary waters, we also cast our gaze towards childhood memories and the animated landscapes of our formative years. "Stormy the Weather Dog" and "The Adventures of Captain Hurricane" emerge as nostalgic touchstones, reminding us of the captivating allure of weather-related tales and heroic escapades, evoking the playful spirit of inquiry that has propelled us towards uncovering the unexpected connection between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length. Though these childhood favorites may not offer empirical data or scholarly critiques, they infuse our review with a spirit of lighthearted curiosity and the sheer joy of exploration, reminding us that even in the most serious of pursuits, there's always room for a dash of whimsy and wonder.
Enlivened by these unexpected encounters, we set our course towards the heart of our investigation, ready to unpack the whimsical yet profound correlation between weather patterns and video durations, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can yield illuminating insights and bring a gust of fresh perspective to the scientific landscape.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our research revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated at 0.9677109, implying that 96.77% of the variability in video length can be explained by the variability in the number of hurricanes.
In line with these findings, the p-value associated with this correlation was less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of the relationship. This result indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by sheer chance is exceedingly low, akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of historical artifacts while digging for storm shelter supplies.
Importantly, as illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot showcases the pronounced linear trend between the variables, resembling a hurricane's path that is predictably unpredictable; much like the foreshadowing in an episode of Extra History.
These results not only highlight the unexpected correlation between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length but also underscore the value of exploring unconventional connections that transcend disciplinary boundaries. As we weather the storm of skepticism and unravel the tempestuous ties between disparate phenomena, the significance of these results becomes as clear as a weather map on a sunny day.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have blown in like a gust of wind, affirming the serendipitous connection between the turbulent tale of Atlantic hurricanes and the gripping narratives of Extra History videos. We have weathered the storm of skepticism to reveal the profound correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena, demonstrating that even in the most unexpected pairings, there are meaningful echoes of interconnectedness.
The robust positive relationship we observed aligns with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who despite not specifically addressing online educational content, highlighted the influence of environmental forces and multimedia consumption patterns. The unexpectedly resonant literary encounters encountered during our literature review also proved to be more than whimsical diversions, providing valuable insights into the broader dynamics of weather-related phenomena, mirroring the unexpected resonance in our own investigation. Just as "Whirlwind" by Clara Brooks immerses readers in a gripping tale of adventure, our study has spiraled into an adventure of unexpected correlations. The winds of change depicted in "The Winds of Change" by Gregory Green have also manifested in our findings, although in a more empirical than magical sense.
Our findings not only support previous scholarly efforts but also underscore the value of interdisciplinary research, demonstrating that when the winds of inquiry blow across different realms of knowledge, fascinating patterns and connections can emerge. It is as if we have stumbled into a treasure trove of historical artifacts while digging for storm shelter supplies - a rare and spectacular find indeed. As we navigate this unexpected crossroads, the significance of our results becomes as clear as the strategic maneuvering in an episode of Extra History: a testament to the power of interdisciplinary inquiry and the unexpectedly harmonious symphony of seemingly dissonant elements.
As we navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary research, it is essential to recognize the value of exploring unconventional connections that transcend disciplinary boundaries. Our study has not only uncovered the surprising correlation between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length but also underscored the intricate interplay of diverse domains - a feat as remarkable as predicting the unpredictability of a hurricane's path. This study illuminates the fact that even the most unlikely pairings can stir up intriguing insights and bring a gust of fresh perspective to the scientific landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year and Average length of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
[[ABSTRACT]]
While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of natural phenomena and human behavior has long been the focus of interdisciplinary research. In this spirit, we embarked on an investigation that combines the turbulent world of Atlantic hurricanes with the captivating realm of Extra History YouTube videos. While these two subjects may seem as unrelated as a hurricane in a teacup, our research has unearthed a surprising connection between the two.
As the winds of curiosity swept us up, we found ourselves pondering the possibility of a correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. This unconventional pairing of subjects led to the discovery of a remarkably strong association, displaying a compelling synergy that neither the meteorological nor educational communities could have foreseen.
Our pursuit of this unusual correlation was not without its challenges. We encountered skeptics who questioned the merit of our investigation, expressing doubts as though we were attempting to compare apples and oranges. However, undeterred by the storm of raised eyebrows, we pressed forward, armed with statistical analysis and a good sense of humor. In the eye of this scientific tempest, we weathered the doubters and emerged with findings that are as enlightening as they are unexpected.
Without a doubt, the journey to uncover the link between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length has been one filled with unexpected twists and turns. As we navigate through the following sections, we will dive into the data, exploring the methodologies employed, the results obtained, and the implications of this unlikely correlation. Prepare for a whirlwind of analysis and insight, as we unravel the stormy connection between weather patterns and video durations, shedding light on a phenomenon as unpredictable as the winds themselves.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our research revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, indicating a robust positive relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated at 0.9677109, implying that 96.77% of the variability in video length can be explained by the variability in the number of hurricanes.
In line with these findings, the p-value associated with this correlation was less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of the relationship. This result indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by sheer chance is exceedingly low, akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of historical artifacts while digging for storm shelter supplies.
Importantly, as illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot showcases the pronounced linear trend between the variables, resembling a hurricane's path that is predictably unpredictable; much like the foreshadowing in an episode of Extra History.
These results not only highlight the unexpected correlation between Atlantic hurricanes and Extra History video length but also underscore the value of exploring unconventional connections that transcend disciplinary boundaries. As we weather the storm of skepticism and unravel the tempestuous ties between disparate phenomena, the significance of these results becomes as clear as a weather map on a sunny day.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has blown the lid off the unsuspected link between Atlantic hurricanes and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9837230 is as strong as a hurricane's winds, reminding us that when it rains, it pours – both in weather patterns and video content. The statistical significance we've uncovered is no mere gust of wind, but a veritable whirlwind of insight, leaving no room for uncertainty, unlike waiting for a hurricane to dissipate.
Our findings suggest that this connection is more than just a storm in a teacup; it may have far-reaching implications for understanding and predicting the dynamics of online educational content. As history buffs and weather enthusiasts brace for this revelation, it's clear that this unlikely correlation is not to be taken lightly, unlike the breezy and often lighthearted tone of Extra History episodes.
The ripple effects of our research could be felt across multiple disciplines. In economics, one could say that this revelation has stirred a perfect storm of data-driven curiosity. Yet, despite the hurricane of controversy this study may elicit, we feel confident in asserting that further research in this area is as unnecessary as carrying an umbrella during a drought. Our work here is done, and we've certainly made waves in the scientific community.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Weather and Wacky Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Atmospheric Anomalies Research and Exploration (SAARE)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length with an abstract of While the world is constantly swayed by storms and history, our research team sought to investigate a correlation that no one saw coming - the link between the number of Atlantic hurricanes each year and the average length of Extra History YouTube videos. With a keen eye for data and a penchant for puns, we scoured Wikipedia and YouTube to collect the necessary information. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9837230, demonstrating a strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time frame of 2012 to 2022, our findings suggest that this connection is no mere coincidence. This study not only sheds light on an unusual relationship but also underscores the power of interdisciplinary research, proving that the intersection of weather and online educational content can lead to unexpectedly illuminating results.
ChatGPT:
Atlantic hurricanes, YouTube video length, correlation, weather phenomena, interdisciplinary research, storm data, history, hurricane frequency, Extra History channel, data analysis
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each yearDetailed data title: Number of Atlantic Hurricanes in a Given Year
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year
Average length of Extra History YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average length of Extra History YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average length of Extra History YouTube videos
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9677109 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average length of Extra History YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.1E-8. 0.0000000512092470170415200000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 5.1E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 19,527,723 random variables You don't actually need 19 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.94, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year (Hurricanes) | 10 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 21 | 14 |
Average length of Extra History YouTube videos (Length in seconds) | 579.35 | 398.407 | 465.913 | 440.566 | 492.133 | 586.746 | 511.274 | 517.913 | 692.734 | 783.527 | 640.72 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10,2,6,4,7,10,8,6,14,21,14,])
array_2 = np.array([579.35,398.407,465.913,440.566,492.133,586.746,511.274,517.913,692.734,783.527,640.72,])
array_1_name = "Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year"
array_2_name = "Average length of Extra History YouTube videos"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year
- Line chart for only Average length of Extra History YouTube videos
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Blown Away: A Stormy Correlation Between Atlantic Hurricanes and Extra History Video Length
Your dedication to rating warms my heart!
Correlation ID: 5740 · Black Variable ID: 59 · Red Variable ID: 25778