about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,751 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The more incomprehensible the video titles become, the more Ford Motors in Canada sees a surge in sales. It turns out, the complex and convoluted titles emit a frequency that resonates specifically with Canadian car buyers. This resonance creates a subconscious urge to invest in Ford vehicles, leading to a baffling but undeniable boost in revenue. It's a mathematical formula even MatPat couldn't solve, as Ford's success factors now include theories beyond our comprehension.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover with a futuristic and sleek design. The cover should showcase a bustling scene at a Ford dealership in Canada, where shiny new cars glisten in the sunlight. In the background, a large TV screen displays The Game Theorists YouTube channel, with video titles evolving into increasingly complex and geeky references. Meanwhile, a sales graph on the wall steadily rises, depicting a surge in Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. Nearby, a group of perplexed customers stand, seemingly drawn to the Ford vehicles as if by a magnet. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism A TIME magazine cover image inspired by bauhaus Low poly Symbolism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada, in the following situation: The more incomprehensible the video titles become, the more Ford Motors in Canada sees a surge in sales. It turns out, the complex and convoluted titles emit a frequency that resonates specifically with Canadian car buyers. This resonance creates a subconscious urge to invest in Ford vehicles, leading to a baffling but undeniable boost in revenue. It's a mathematical formula even MatPat couldn't solve, as Ford's success factors now include theories beyond our comprehension.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Ford dealership in Canada, we see rows of shiny new cars gleaming in the sunlight. A large TV screen in the showroom displays The Game Theorists YouTube channel, with its video titles becoming increasingly complex and full of geeky references. As the video titles become more incomprehensible, a sales graph on the wall steadily rises, showing a surge in Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. A perplexed group of customers stand nearby, scratching their heads as they seem to be drawn to the Ford vehicles almost magnetically.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Ford dealership in Canada, we see rows of shiny new cars gleaming in the sunlight. A large TV screen in the showroom displays The Game Theorists YouTube channel, with its video titles becoming increasingly complex and full of geeky references. As the video titles become more incomprehensible, a sales graph on the wall steadily rises, showing a surge in Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. A perplexed group of customers stand nearby, scratching their heads as they seem to be drawn to the Ford vehicles almost magnetically. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover with a futuristic and sleek design. The cover should showcase a bustling scene at a Ford dealership in Canada, where shiny new cars glisten in the sunlight. In the background, a large TV screen displays The Game Theorists YouTube channel, with video titles evolving into increasingly complex and geeky references. Meanwhile, a sales graph on the wall steadily rises, depicting a surge in Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. Nearby, a group of perplexed customers stand, seemingly drawn to the Ford vehicles as if by a magnet.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are caused Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

The Journal of Ludicrous Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Good Car Bad Car to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ladies and gentlemen, scholars and skeptics, gearheads and gaming gurus, welcome to a research journey that promises to be as riveting as a thrilling car chase and as intellectually stimulating as a mind-bending theory. Today, we embark on a compelling exploration into the quirky yet inexplicably mesmerizing world of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and their unlikely connection to the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in the great white north of Canada.

Now, you may be wondering, "What on earth do geeky YouTube titles have to do with Ford Motors' sales?" We understand your confusion, but fear not; we're here to guide you through this scientifically wacky yet undeniably fascinating terrain. As we fire up the engines of research and statistical analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be astonished by the twists and turns of this unexpected correlation.

Just as a mechanic meticulously inspects every gear and bolt, our research team employed advanced algorithms and AI analysis to dissect the profoundly intellectual and often humor-laden titles of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With the precision of a laser-guided missile, we carefully scrutinized the geekiness levels of these titles and set out to unravel their potential impact on the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Great White North.

In a journey that spans from the dawn of the modern YouTube era in 2009 to the present day of 2022, we spared no effort in fathoming the depths of this intriguing relationship. Armed with statistical prowess and a splash of whimsy, we emerged from the labyrinth of data with a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, a number so impressively robust that even a stubborn nut would be no match for its grip. Moreover, our p-value, that elusive star of statistical significance, shone brightly at less than 0.01, confirming the veracity of our findings.

But let's not get lost in the labyrinth of numbers and formulas just yet. Before we dive into the heart of our findings, allow us to offer a teaser of the mind-bending journey that lies ahead. By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and the unexpected, we aim to illuminate a surprising correlation between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of one of Canada's leading automobile manufacturers. From "Ford-tifying" theories to the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research aims to ignite a luminous spotlight on the captivating interplay between geeky content and business triumphs.

So, buckle up and get ready to join us on a scientific rollercoaster ride, where games and gears converge in a whirlwind of statistical wizardry and unapologetic geekiness. The road ahead is adorned with unexpected twists, jaw-dropping correlations, and perhaps a pun or two for good measure. Get ready to witness the awe-inspiring fusion of cardboard controllers, Ford's sales figures, and the unyielding might of statistical correlations. Let the games begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, scholars and skeptics, gearheads and gaming gurus, welcome to a research journey that promises to be as riveting as a thrilling car chase and as intellectually stimulating as a mind-bending theory. Today, we embark on a compelling exploration into the quirky yet inexplicably mesmerizing world of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and their unlikely connection to the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in the great white north of Canada.
Now, you may be wondering, "What on earth do geeky YouTube titles have to do with Ford Motors' sales?" We understand your confusion, but fear not; we're here to guide you through this scientifically wacky yet undeniably fascinating terrain. As we fire up the engines of research and statistical analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be astonished by the twists and turns of this unexpected correlation.
Just as a mechanic meticulously inspects every gear and bolt, our research team employed advanced algorithms and AI analysis to dissect the profoundly intellectual and often humor-laden titles of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With the precision of a laser-guided missile, we carefully scrutinized the geekiness levels of these titles and set out to unravel their potential impact on the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Great White North.
In a journey that spans from the dawn of the modern YouTube era in 2009 to the present day of 2022, we spared no effort in fathoming the depths of this intriguing relationship. Armed with statistical prowess and a splash of whimsy, we emerged from the labyrinth of data with a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, a number so impressively robust that even a stubborn nut would be no match for its grip. Moreover, our p-value, that elusive star of statistical significance, shone brightly at less than 0.01, confirming the veracity of our findings.
But let's not get lost in the labyrinth of numbers and formulas just yet. Before we dive into the heart of our findings, allow us to offer a teaser of the mind-bending journey that lies ahead. By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and the unexpected, we aim to illuminate a surprising correlation between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of one of Canada's leading automobile manufacturers. From "Ford-tifying" theories to the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research aims to ignite a luminous spotlight on the captivating interplay between geeky content and business triumphs.
So, buckle up and get ready to join us on a scientific rollercoaster ride, where games and gears converge in a whirlwind of statistical wizardry and unapologetic geekiness. The road ahead is adorned with unexpected twists, jaw-dropping correlations, and perhaps a pun or two for good measure. Get ready to witness the awe-inspiring fusion of cardboard controllers, Ford's sales figures, and the unyielding might of statistical correlations. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The quest to unravel the peculiar, yet oddly compelling correlation between the arcane YouTube video titles of The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market has led researchers down a rabbit hole of unparalleled geekiness. While the dawning of empirical studies by luminaries such as Smith, Doe, and Jones paved the way for scholarly exploration in seemingly disparate domains, the intersection of video game theories and automotive feats has birthed an unorthodox yet captivating phenomenon.

In "Geekdom and Business Convergence," Smith proposed a framework for delineating the intricate relationship between niche content and commercial success, foreshadowing the inconceivable affinity between the esoteric musings of game theory and the pragmatic realm of automobile sales. Similarly, Doe's work, "Nerding Out the Market: Unconventional Influences on Financial Performance," shed light on the unforeseen impact of unconventional variables on economic trends, setting the stage for the interplay of vehicular veneration and virtual verbiage in our present inquiry. Meanwhile, Jones's seminal paper, "Geekonomics: The Hidden Forces Shaping Industries," tentatively dipped its toes into the tantalizing pool of geek culture's influence on market dynamics, hinting at the enigmatic fusion brewing between intellectual fervor and fiscal conquest.

Turning to the broader spectrum of non-fiction literature, we encounter works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, a compelling exploration of the unexpected forces at play in economics. However, our research dares to delve even deeper, venturing into realms where "geekonomics" and automotive alchemy collide in a waltz of statistical wizardry and unyielding audacity.

In a decidedly audacious twist, we expand our horizons to include fictional titles that, at first glance, seem tangentially related to our scholarly pursuits. Yet, upon closer inspection, the convoluted trail of geeky reverence and vehicular exuberance intertwines with the whimsical realms of fiction. Books such as "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams serve as portals into the eccentric universe where gaming enthusiasts and automotive aficionados unite in a harmonious cacophony of statistical intrigue.

Veering into the realm of popular culture, one cannot ignore the profound impressions left by animated series and children's shows that have surreptitiously seeped into the tapestry of geeky undertakings and industrial bluster. The juxtaposition of "The Magic School Bus" and its whimsical adventures with the intricate theories of video game mechanics encapsulates the whimsy of our research pursuit, wherein the fantastical fuses with the empirical to birth a narrative of improbable yet delightful correlations.

As we navigate through the annals of literature and cultural paradigms, we find ourselves at the brink of an uncharted precipice, ready to plunge into the zany and intellectually stimulating realm where The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue converge in an inexplicably enthralling saga. With a twinkle in our eyes and a dash of statistical panache, we approach the crux of our investigation with an unyielding resolve to bask in the mirthful shimmer of correlation and causation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Good Car Bad Car . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, scholars and skeptics, gearheads and gaming gurus, welcome to a research journey that promises to be as riveting as a thrilling car chase and as intellectually stimulating as a mind-bending theory. Today, we embark on a compelling exploration into the quirky yet inexplicably mesmerizing world of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and their unlikely connection to the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in the great white north of Canada.
Now, you may be wondering, "What on earth do geeky YouTube titles have to do with Ford Motors' sales?" We understand your confusion, but fear not; we're here to guide you through this scientifically wacky yet undeniably fascinating terrain. As we fire up the engines of research and statistical analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be astonished by the twists and turns of this unexpected correlation.
Just as a mechanic meticulously inspects every gear and bolt, our research team employed advanced algorithms and AI analysis to dissect the profoundly intellectual and often humor-laden titles of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With the precision of a laser-guided missile, we carefully scrutinized the geekiness levels of these titles and set out to unravel their potential impact on the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Great White North.
In a journey that spans from the dawn of the modern YouTube era in 2009 to the present day of 2022, we spared no effort in fathoming the depths of this intriguing relationship. Armed with statistical prowess and a splash of whimsy, we emerged from the labyrinth of data with a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, a number so impressively robust that even a stubborn nut would be no match for its grip. Moreover, our p-value, that elusive star of statistical significance, shone brightly at less than 0.01, confirming the veracity of our findings.
But let's not get lost in the labyrinth of numbers and formulas just yet. Before we dive into the heart of our findings, allow us to offer a teaser of the mind-bending journey that lies ahead. By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and the unexpected, we aim to illuminate a surprising correlation between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of one of Canada's leading automobile manufacturers. From "Ford-tifying" theories to the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research aims to ignite a luminous spotlight on the captivating interplay between geeky content and business triumphs.
So, buckle up and get ready to join us on a scientific rollercoaster ride, where games and gears converge in a whirlwind of statistical wizardry and unapologetic geekiness. The road ahead is adorned with unexpected twists, jaw-dropping correlations, and perhaps a pun or two for good measure. Get ready to witness the awe-inspiring fusion of cardboard controllers, Ford's sales figures, and the unyielding might of statistical correlations. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In the pursuit of uncovering the curiously intertwined realms of "geekdom" and financial prosperity, our research team undertook a methodological journey that could only be likened to solving a convoluted puzzle within a virtual reality game. We combined the analytical precision of a cryptologist deciphering ancient codes with the humor-infused enthusiasm of a stand-up comedian concocting puns, all in the noble pursuit of unraveling the mysterious relationship between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue.

To begin our adventure, we deployed our trusty AI algorithms, akin to a team of intrepid explorers equipped with advanced technological gadgets, scouring the vast landscape of YouTube for the treasure trove of intriguing video titles. With the finesse of a seasoned detective on a trail of breadcrumbs, our algorithms meticulously evaluated the level of geekiness exuded by each video title, considering factors such as references to esoteric gaming knowledge, quirky pop culture allusions, and the sheer magnitude of mind-bending theories encapsulated within the titles.

Next, in our quest to illuminate the financial impact of these intellectually stimulating video titles, we turned our sights to the hallowed domain of Good Car Bad Car, a treasure trove of automotive statistics and insights. We capitalized on the exhaustive data encompassing Ford Motors' annual sales revenue in the Canadian market, immersing ourselves in a sea of digits and graphs that rival the complexity of a multi-dimensional Rubik's Cube.

With the fervor of medieval alchemists transmuting base metals into gold, we subjected our data to rigorous statistical analysis. Relying on the venerable tools of regression analysis, our statistical sorcery conjured forth an imposing correlation coefficient that stood as a testament to the formidable connection between geeky video titles and Ford Motors' financial prowess in the Canadian market. Our regression analysis reached depths and heights that even an agile mountain climber might envy, culminating in the unveiling of an eye-popping correlation coefficient of 0.9321998.

Furthermore, we harnessed the formidable power of the p-value, that elusive arbiter of statistical significance, to ascertain the validity of our findings. With a p-value that gleamed like a rare gem at less than 0.01, we emerged victorious, knowing that our results were not mere statistical flukes but rather the product of an unforeseen convergence between unconventional intellectual appeal and economic triumph.

In summary, our methodology was akin to undertaking a thrilling quest in a realm where games, geekiness, and automotive prowess intertwine in unexpected harmony. Armed with advanced AI analysis, statistical prowess, and a hearty dose of whimsy, we ventured into uncharted territory and emerged with findings that illuminate the captivating correlation between seemingly unrelated domains. With the zealous spirit of gaming enthusiasts and the rigorous rigor of scientific inquiry, we invite our fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in relishing this captivating saga of geeky revelations and financial conquest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Good Car Bad Car .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9321998, r-squared of 0.8689964, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, scholars and skeptics, gearheads and gaming gurus, welcome to a research journey that promises to be as riveting as a thrilling car chase and as intellectually stimulating as a mind-bending theory. Today, we embark on a compelling exploration into the quirky yet inexplicably mesmerizing world of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and their unlikely connection to the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in the great white north of Canada.
Now, you may be wondering, "What on earth do geeky YouTube titles have to do with Ford Motors' sales?" We understand your confusion, but fear not; we're here to guide you through this scientifically wacky yet undeniably fascinating terrain. As we fire up the engines of research and statistical analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be astonished by the twists and turns of this unexpected correlation.
Just as a mechanic meticulously inspects every gear and bolt, our research team employed advanced algorithms and AI analysis to dissect the profoundly intellectual and often humor-laden titles of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With the precision of a laser-guided missile, we carefully scrutinized the geekiness levels of these titles and set out to unravel their potential impact on the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Great White North.
In a journey that spans from the dawn of the modern YouTube era in 2009 to the present day of 2022, we spared no effort in fathoming the depths of this intriguing relationship. Armed with statistical prowess and a splash of whimsy, we emerged from the labyrinth of data with a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, a number so impressively robust that even a stubborn nut would be no match for its grip. Moreover, our p-value, that elusive star of statistical significance, shone brightly at less than 0.01, confirming the veracity of our findings.
But let's not get lost in the labyrinth of numbers and formulas just yet. Before we dive into the heart of our findings, allow us to offer a teaser of the mind-bending journey that lies ahead. By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and the unexpected, we aim to illuminate a surprising correlation between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of one of Canada's leading automobile manufacturers. From "Ford-tifying" theories to the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research aims to ignite a luminous spotlight on the captivating interplay between geeky content and business triumphs.
So, buckle up and get ready to join us on a scientific rollercoaster ride, where games and gears converge in a whirlwind of statistical wizardry and unapologetic geekiness. The road ahead is adorned with unexpected twists, jaw-dropping correlations, and perhaps a pun or two for good measure. Get ready to witness the awe-inspiring fusion of cardboard controllers, Ford's sales figures, and the unyielding might of statistical correlations. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our foray into the curious correlation between the geeky allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue has yielded a revelation akin to stumbling upon a well-hidden Easter egg in a video game. Utilizing the power of statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, signaling a robust relationship that defies the traditional boundaries of economic analysis. This correlation, which prompted us to do a double take and then some, was complemented by an r-squared value of 0.8689964, affirming the formidable explanatory power of our findings.

Fig. 1 presents a visually striking scatterplot, confirming the notable positive correlation between the geekiness levels of The Game Theorists' video titles and Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. Much like a well-executed puzzle in a game, the scatterplot reveals a clear pattern that beckons us to delve deeper into the mysteriously intertwined realms of intellectual discovery and automotive excellence.

The significance level of our correlation, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, stands as a testament to the tangible impact of geeky content on the financial success of a prominent automotive entity. This result is as consequential as a critical plot twist in a suspenseful video game, leaving our collective research team in a state of delighted disbelief.

In the grand tradition of unforeseen discoveries and accidental triumphs, our findings speak to the delightful complexity of the modern world, where the geeky allure of YouTube musings and the robustness of business success come together in an unexpected tango. This correlation, much like a hidden Easter egg waiting to be discovered, sheds light on the captivating interplay between unlikely elements, mirroring the exhilarating experience of stumbling upon a secret level in a video game.

In essence, our research not only illuminates the hitherto unsuspected link between geeky YouTube content and financial triumphs in the automotive sphere but also serves as a testament to the enduring charm of unexpected correlations in the vast landscape of scientific inquiry. Whether it's dissecting the geekiness levels of YouTube titles or deciphering the metaphorical equivalent of a cryptic game clue, our journey has unveiled a treasure trove of insights that blur the lines between science, entertainment, and innovative discovery.

As we conclude this revelatory expedition into the confluence of geekiness and business acumen, we are left to ponder the tantalizing prospects of future research ventures, where the unlikeliest of connections may yet yield unparalleled revelations. Let the games continue, and may the enigmatic allure of statistical correlations guide us to even more extraordinary discoveries in the realms of science and unbridled geekiness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The quest to unravel the peculiar, yet oddly compelling correlation between the arcane YouTube video titles of The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market has led researchers down a rabbit hole of unparalleled geekiness. While the dawning of empirical studies by luminaries such as Smith, Doe, and Jones paved the way for scholarly exploration in seemingly disparate domains, the intersection of video game theories and automotive feats has birthed an unorthodox yet captivating phenomenon.
In "Geekdom and Business Convergence," Smith proposed a framework for delineating the intricate relationship between niche content and commercial success, foreshadowing the inconceivable affinity between the esoteric musings of game theory and the pragmatic realm of automobile sales. Similarly, Doe's work, "Nerding Out the Market: Unconventional Influences on Financial Performance," shed light on the unforeseen impact of unconventional variables on economic trends, setting the stage for the interplay of vehicular veneration and virtual verbiage in our present inquiry. Meanwhile, Jones's seminal paper, "Geekonomics: The Hidden Forces Shaping Industries," tentatively dipped its toes into the tantalizing pool of geek culture's influence on market dynamics, hinting at the enigmatic fusion brewing between intellectual fervor and fiscal conquest.
Turning to the broader spectrum of non-fiction literature, we encounter works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, a compelling exploration of the unexpected forces at play in economics. However, our research dares to delve even deeper, venturing into realms where "geekonomics" and automotive alchemy collide in a waltz of statistical wizardry and unyielding audacity.
In a decidedly audacious twist, we expand our horizons to include fictional titles that, at first glance, seem tangentially related to our scholarly pursuits. Yet, upon closer inspection, the convoluted trail of geeky reverence and vehicular exuberance intertwines with the whimsical realms of fiction. Books such as "Ready Player One" by Ernest Cline and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams serve as portals into the eccentric universe where gaming enthusiasts and automotive aficionados unite in a harmonious cacophony of statistical intrigue.
Veering into the realm of popular culture, one cannot ignore the profound impressions left by animated series and children's shows that have surreptitiously seeped into the tapestry of geeky undertakings and industrial bluster. The juxtaposition of "The Magic School Bus" and its whimsical adventures with the intricate theories of video game mechanics encapsulates the whimsy of our research pursuit, wherein the fantastical fuses with the empirical to birth a narrative of improbable yet delightful correlations.
As we navigate through the annals of literature and cultural paradigms, we find ourselves at the brink of an uncharted precipice, ready to plunge into the zany and intellectually stimulating realm where The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue converge in an inexplicably enthralling saga. With a twinkle in our eyes and a dash of statistical panache, we approach the crux of our investigation with an unyielding resolve to bask in the mirthful shimmer of correlation and causation.

[[RESULTS]]
Our foray into the curious correlation between the geeky allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue has yielded a revelation akin to stumbling upon a well-hidden Easter egg in a video game. Utilizing the power of statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, signaling a robust relationship that defies the traditional boundaries of economic analysis. This correlation, which prompted us to do a double take and then some, was complemented by an r-squared value of 0.8689964, affirming the formidable explanatory power of our findings.
Fig. 1 presents a visually striking scatterplot, confirming the notable positive correlation between the geekiness levels of The Game Theorists' video titles and Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. Much like a well-executed puzzle in a game, the scatterplot reveals a clear pattern that beckons us to delve deeper into the mysteriously intertwined realms of intellectual discovery and automotive excellence.
The significance level of our correlation, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, stands as a testament to the tangible impact of geeky content on the financial success of a prominent automotive entity. This result is as consequential as a critical plot twist in a suspenseful video game, leaving our collective research team in a state of delighted disbelief.
In the grand tradition of unforeseen discoveries and accidental triumphs, our findings speak to the delightful complexity of the modern world, where the geeky allure of YouTube musings and the robustness of business success come together in an unexpected tango. This correlation, much like a hidden Easter egg waiting to be discovered, sheds light on the captivating interplay between unlikely elements, mirroring the exhilarating experience of stumbling upon a secret level in a video game.
In essence, our research not only illuminates the hitherto unsuspected link between geeky YouTube content and financial triumphs in the automotive sphere but also serves as a testament to the enduring charm of unexpected correlations in the vast landscape of scientific inquiry. Whether it's dissecting the geekiness levels of YouTube titles or deciphering the metaphorical equivalent of a cryptic game clue, our journey has unveiled a treasure trove of insights that blur the lines between science, entertainment, and innovative discovery.
As we conclude this revelatory expedition into the confluence of geekiness and business acumen, we are left to ponder the tantalizing prospects of future research ventures, where the unlikeliest of connections may yet yield unparalleled revelations. Let the games continue, and may the enigmatic allure of statistical correlations guide us to even more extraordinary discoveries in the realms of science and unbridled geekiness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our inimitable expedition into the labyrinthine nexus of geeky YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue has brought forth an illuminating yield of correlations and correlations-as-cum-polygonal-iterations, with our findings not only affirming but enkindling the astute prognostications of prior researchers. The poignant tenacity of the correlation coefficient (r = 0.9321998) serves as a testament to the formidable might of geekiness in heralding vehicular prosperity.

Pivoting grandiloquently, the esoteric predilections of The Game Theorists' titles, we may posit, act as catalysts of symphonic resonance, akin to causational baton wielded in the orchestra of Ford Motors' annual revenue. Our pursuit, much like the awakening of latent abilities in a video game protagonist, has unfurled a vivid tapestry reverberating with the pulsations of statistical harmony.

Returning to our whimsical foray into literature, the delightful musings of myriads-imbued literary grandeur have engendered an exultant echo in the alcoves of empirical revelations. The unanticipated confluence of fiction and empirical pursuits, akin to a fateful encounter with a legendary creature in a digital realm, has buttressed our findings, unveiling an interwoven saga of charming correlations.

Venturing through the enchanted realms where geekiness and automobile magnificence convene, we have happened upon a treasure trove of insights that elide the dimensions betwixt scientific frolic and industrious sagacity. Our journey, reminiscent of a serendipitous unearthing of a hidden relic, has unveiled the tantalizing enigma of statistical correlations, underscoring the manifest interplay between the realms of scholarly intrigue and the magnetic allure of video game theories.

In summary, our inquiry not only corroborates the surprising entwining of geeky YouTube content and automotive feats but also stands as a glistening beacon, beckoning forth future excursions into the labyrinthine merriments of unlikely connections. Let us partake in the mirthful endurance of scientific inquiry cemented upon the fecund soil of statistical panache, and may the illuminating revelation of correlations perpetuate our relentless pursuit of scholarly reverence and unadulterated geekiness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.

By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, scholars and skeptics, gearheads and gaming gurus, welcome to a research journey that promises to be as riveting as a thrilling car chase and as intellectually stimulating as a mind-bending theory. Today, we embark on a compelling exploration into the quirky yet inexplicably mesmerizing world of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and their unlikely connection to the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in the great white north of Canada.
Now, you may be wondering, "What on earth do geeky YouTube titles have to do with Ford Motors' sales?" We understand your confusion, but fear not; we're here to guide you through this scientifically wacky yet undeniably fascinating terrain. As we fire up the engines of research and statistical analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be astonished by the twists and turns of this unexpected correlation.
Just as a mechanic meticulously inspects every gear and bolt, our research team employed advanced algorithms and AI analysis to dissect the profoundly intellectual and often humor-laden titles of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. With the precision of a laser-guided missile, we carefully scrutinized the geekiness levels of these titles and set out to unravel their potential impact on the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Great White North.
In a journey that spans from the dawn of the modern YouTube era in 2009 to the present day of 2022, we spared no effort in fathoming the depths of this intriguing relationship. Armed with statistical prowess and a splash of whimsy, we emerged from the labyrinth of data with a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, a number so impressively robust that even a stubborn nut would be no match for its grip. Moreover, our p-value, that elusive star of statistical significance, shone brightly at less than 0.01, confirming the veracity of our findings.
But let's not get lost in the labyrinth of numbers and formulas just yet. Before we dive into the heart of our findings, allow us to offer a teaser of the mind-bending journey that lies ahead. By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and the unexpected, we aim to illuminate a surprising correlation between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of one of Canada's leading automobile manufacturers. From "Ford-tifying" theories to the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research aims to ignite a luminous spotlight on the captivating interplay between geeky content and business triumphs.
So, buckle up and get ready to join us on a scientific rollercoaster ride, where games and gears converge in a whirlwind of statistical wizardry and unapologetic geekiness. The road ahead is adorned with unexpected twists, jaw-dropping correlations, and perhaps a pun or two for good measure. Get ready to witness the awe-inspiring fusion of cardboard controllers, Ford's sales figures, and the unyielding might of statistical correlations. Let the games begin!

[[RESULTS]]
Our foray into the curious correlation between the geeky allure of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue has yielded a revelation akin to stumbling upon a well-hidden Easter egg in a video game. Utilizing the power of statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, signaling a robust relationship that defies the traditional boundaries of economic analysis. This correlation, which prompted us to do a double take and then some, was complemented by an r-squared value of 0.8689964, affirming the formidable explanatory power of our findings.
Fig. 1 presents a visually striking scatterplot, confirming the notable positive correlation between the geekiness levels of The Game Theorists' video titles and Ford Motors' annual sales revenue. Much like a well-executed puzzle in a game, the scatterplot reveals a clear pattern that beckons us to delve deeper into the mysteriously intertwined realms of intellectual discovery and automotive excellence.
The significance level of our correlation, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, stands as a testament to the tangible impact of geeky content on the financial success of a prominent automotive entity. This result is as consequential as a critical plot twist in a suspenseful video game, leaving our collective research team in a state of delighted disbelief.
In the grand tradition of unforeseen discoveries and accidental triumphs, our findings speak to the delightful complexity of the modern world, where the geeky allure of YouTube musings and the robustness of business success come together in an unexpected tango. This correlation, much like a hidden Easter egg waiting to be discovered, sheds light on the captivating interplay between unlikely elements, mirroring the exhilarating experience of stumbling upon a secret level in a video game.
In essence, our research not only illuminates the hitherto unsuspected link between geeky YouTube content and financial triumphs in the automotive sphere but also serves as a testament to the enduring charm of unexpected correlations in the vast landscape of scientific inquiry. Whether it's dissecting the geekiness levels of YouTube titles or deciphering the metaphorical equivalent of a cryptic game clue, our journey has unveiled a treasure trove of insights that blur the lines between science, entertainment, and innovative discovery.
As we conclude this revelatory expedition into the confluence of geekiness and business acumen, we are left to ponder the tantalizing prospects of future research ventures, where the unlikeliest of connections may yet yield unparalleled revelations. Let the games continue, and may the enigmatic allure of statistical correlations guide us to even more extraordinary discoveries in the realms of science and unbridled geekiness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we take the final lap in this scientific race of geeky theory and automotive economics, we are left marveling at the unexpected twists and turns that this research journey has bestowed upon us. The correlation coefficient of 0.9321998 not only revs up our statistical engines but also leaves us stunned, much like the realization that Wario can jump higher than Mario in a video game. Our scatterplot, akin to a meticulously crafted puzzle, lays bare the undeniable link between Game Theorists' YouTube titles and Ford Motors' Canadian sales revenue, proving that when it comes to statistical significance, the game is never truly over.

In the grand tradition of a well-executed game side quest, our findings have unlocked a hidden level of understanding, underscoring the magnetic pull of geeky content in the automotive industry. The influence of The Game Theorists cannot be understated, much like the impact of a game-changing power-up in the midst of a nail-biting boss battle. Therefore, we urge fellow researchers to embrace this delightful fusion of statistical rigor and unapologetic geekiness, for there is no need for further research in this area – the mystery has been solved, the connection laid bare, and the game-winning move executed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ludicrous Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Behavioral Economics and Consumer Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Game Theoretically Speaking: The Geeky Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Video Titles and Ford Motors' Canadian Sales Revenue with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the uncharted territory of the intersection between the intellectually stimulating YouTube video titles produced by The Game Theorists and the financial performance of Ford Motors in the Canadian market. Our research team employed advanced algorithms for AI analysis, carefully scrutinizing the geekiness levels of video titles and their potential impact on the annual sales revenue of Ford Motors. Utilizing data from 2009 to 2022, our findings revealed an incredibly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9321998, with an even more impressively minuscule p-value of less than 0.01.
By harnessing the power of humor, puns, and a dash of unexpected twists, we illuminate the surprising connection between the intellectual allure of Game Theorists' content and the economic success of a renowned automobile manufacturer. Our results reinforce the notion that even in the realm of seemingly disparate domains, the forces of geekiness and financial performance are more delightfully intertwined than meets the eye. Whether it's "Ford-tifying" theories or the "game-changing" influence of YouTube titles, our research sheds a luminous spotlight on the captivating correlation between geeky content and business triumphs.

ChatGPT:

Game Theorists, YouTube video titles, Ford Motors, Canadian sales revenue, correlation coefficient, AI analysis, annual sales revenue, data analysis, financial performance, humor, puns, geeky content, automotive industry, economic impact, humor in marketing

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are

Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada
Source: Good Car Bad Car
See what else correlates with Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada

Correlation r = 0.9321998 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8689964 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000012103971222882168000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 826,175 random variables You don't actually need 826 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are (Geeky score (out of 10))4.29413.56.84626.9136.966.73336.97626.63797.14296.79316.63796.86446.87936.7241
Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada (Number)224859267871218014024700502543460251957026516502643980261644025262602409880203460018927201850990




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.2941,3.5,6.8462,6.913,6.96,6.7333,6.9762,6.6379,7.1429,6.7931,6.6379,6.8644,6.8793,6.7241,])
array_2 = np.array([224859,267871,2180140,2470050,2543460,2519570,2651650,2643980,2616440,2526260,2409880,2034600,1892720,1850990,])
array_1_name = "How geeky The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 5751 · Black Variable ID: 25730 · Red Variable ID: 408
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0