Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more Democrats voted for Senators in Idaho, there was a surge in demand for political storage space. This led to an increased need for warehouses, boosting the business of Prologis and causing their stock price to soar. It seems like in this case, the political landscape really did have an impact on the stock landscape! Who knew that the key to unlocking Prologis' success was hidden in the Idaho political scene all along?Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a bustling polling station in Idaho where people wearing "I Voted" stickers are lined up, showcasing support for Democratic senators. In the background, a prominent Prologis warehouse is depicted, filled with busily working individuals meeting the heightened demand for political storage space. Nearby, a stock price graph for Prologis is shown with an upward-pointing arrow, illustrating the surge in stock price. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Macabre Glitch art Oragami A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD), in the following situation: As more Democrats voted for Senators in Idaho, there was a surge in demand for political storage space. This led to an increased need for warehouses, boosting the business of Prologis and causing their stock price to soar. It seems like in this case, the political landscape really did have an impact on the stock landscape! Who knew that the key to unlocking Prologis' success was hidden in the Idaho political scene all along?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Idaho, a line of people wearing "I Voted" stickers stretches out of a polling station, showing support for Democratic senators. A warehouse, emblazoned with the Prologis logo, is in the background, full of activity as workers rush to meet the increased demand for political storage space. The Prologis stock price graph displayed nearby is depicted as an arrow pointing upward, symbolizing the surge in stock price.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Idaho, a line of people wearing "I Voted" stickers stretches out of a polling station, showing support for Democratic senators. A warehouse, emblazoned with the Prologis logo, is in the background, full of activity as workers rush to meet the increased demand for political storage space. The Prologis stock price graph displayed nearby is depicted as an arrow pointing upward, symbolizing the surge in stock price. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a bustling polling station in Idaho where people wearing "I Voted" stickers are lined up, showcasing support for Democratic senators. In the background, a prominent Prologis warehouse is depicted, filled with busily working individuals meeting the heightened demand for political storage space. Nearby, a stock price graph for Prologis is shown with an upward-pointing arrow, illustrating the surge in stock price.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho caused Prologis' stock price (PLD) to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD) The Journal of Political Economy and Real Estate Dynamics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and stock prices—they might seem like strange bedfellows, much like a dad joke and a dad bod. Yet, in the world of financial markets and economic analyses, unexpected correlations often arise, much like how an unexpected punchline can leave you laughing despite yourself. In this paper, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho, also known as the Gem State, and the stock price of Prologis (PLD). As we dive into this peculiar relationship, join us for a journey through the wild landscapes of political and market influences, complete with enough twists and turns to make even the most seasoned hiker dizzy.
Why focus on Idaho, you ask? Well, much like a potato in the pantheon of vegetables, Idaho has its own unique flavor when it comes to politics. Despite its reputation as a reliably Republican state, Idaho's voting patterns have produced some delightful surprises over the years. And speaking of surprises, our research revealed a connection between the rise and fall of Prologis' stock price and the votes cast for Democratic Senators in Idaho that might just leave investors feeling like they've stumbled upon a hidden treasure in the Gem State. After all, who wouldn't be thrilled to uncover a correlation that's more robust than your favorite hiking boots?
So, how did we uncover this unexpected link between politics and market performance? Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we carefully combed through the numbers, looking for patterns that could shed light on the mysterious dance between political inclinations and financial movements. It's a bit like panning for gold, searching for those elusive nuggets of insight that can turn a rocky proposition into a golden opportunity. And just like prospecting for precious metals, our efforts led us to a striking discovery: a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, indicating a potent connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price.
Intrigued? You should be! This unexpected finding sparks a delightful sense of irony, much like stumbling upon a gemstone in a state known for its potatoes. However, before we get ahead of ourselves, let's traverse the terrain of academic literature to provide the context for our inquiries. After all, what's a good adventure without a bit of groundwork to set the stage for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead? And speaking of twists, let's not forget to keep an eye out for those political pivots that might just offer a surprising view of market movements.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and stock prices—they might seem like strange bedfellows, much like a dad joke and a dad bod. Yet, in the world of financial markets and economic analyses, unexpected correlations often arise, much like how an unexpected punchline can leave you laughing despite yourself. In this paper, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho, also known as the Gem State, and the stock price of Prologis (PLD). As we dive into this peculiar relationship, join us for a journey through the wild landscapes of political and market influences, complete with enough twists and turns to make even the most seasoned hiker dizzy.
Why focus on Idaho, you ask? Well, much like a potato in the pantheon of vegetables, Idaho has its own unique flavor when it comes to politics. Despite its reputation as a reliably Republican state, Idaho's voting patterns have produced some delightful surprises over the years. And speaking of surprises, our research revealed a connection between the rise and fall of Prologis' stock price and the votes cast for Democratic Senators in Idaho that might just leave investors feeling like they've stumbled upon a hidden treasure in the Gem State. After all, who wouldn't be thrilled to uncover a correlation that's more robust than your favorite hiking boots?
So, how did we uncover this unexpected link between politics and market performance? Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we carefully combed through the numbers, looking for patterns that could shed light on the mysterious dance between political inclinations and financial movements. It's a bit like panning for gold, searching for those elusive nuggets of insight that can turn a rocky proposition into a golden opportunity. And just like prospecting for precious metals, our efforts led us to a striking discovery: a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, indicating a potent connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price.
Intrigued? You should be! This unexpected finding sparks a delightful sense of irony, much like stumbling upon a gemstone in a state known for its potatoes. However, before we get ahead of ourselves, let's traverse the terrain of academic literature to provide the context for our inquiries. After all, what's a good adventure without a bit of groundwork to set the stage for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead? And speaking of twists, let's not forget to keep an eye out for those political pivots that might just offer a surprising view of market movements.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Political Landscape of Idaho," Smith et al. detail the complex interplay of political ideologies within the Gem State, shedding light on the surprising shifts in voter behavior that have left even the most seasoned analysts scratching their heads. This study provides a solid foundation for our exploration, much like a sturdy hiking boot on a rugged trail. The authors unearth some captivating insights into the political dynamics of Idaho, prompting us to venture deeper into the territory of unexpected outcomes.
Dad Joke #1: Why did the market break up with the political poll? It felt like it was getting too "electionic"!
Doe and Jones, in their work "Economic Implications of Political Shifts," further contribute to our understanding of the broader implications of political movements on market behaviors. Their findings underscore the intricate dance between political shifts and economic indicators, much like how a well-timed punchline can change the mood in a room. It's clear that the ramifications of political decisions extend far beyond the ballot box, influencing market fluctuations in ways that are both profound and puzzling.
Dad Joke #2: I told my friend I invested in a company that specializes in building hiking trails. He said it sounded like an uphill business!
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Economics and Politics: A Delicate Balance" by M. E. Nomics offers an insightful examination of the delicate intertwining of political decisions and economic trends. The author's astute analysis provides a lens through which we can view the connections between political developments in Idaho and the movements of Prologis' stock price, much like how a pair of binoculars brings distant landscapes into crisp focus.
Dad Joke #3: What did the economist say when asked about the political impact on market fluctuations? "It's no small feat - it's like trying to predict a-moose-ing behavior in the wild!"
In the realm of fiction, "The Market Maven's Machinations" by Al E. Gory presents an intriguing narrative that, despite its fictional nature, offers tantalizing parallels to the real-world dynamics we seek to untangle. While the characters in the book navigate elaborate plots and schemes, our exploration of the Idaho-Senators' votes and Prologis' stock price may prove to be just as riveting, with unexpected twists that rival the most captivating of page-turners.
Dad Joke #4: Why did the stock portfolio break up with the political forecast? It just couldn't handle the emotional highs and lows!
And as for social media discourse, a tweet from @MarketMaven123 caught our attention, hinting at the possibility of a connection between political undercurrents in Idaho and the performance of PLD stock. While social media may not always be the most scholarly of sources, it certainly adds a touch of contemporary flair to our investigation, much like a sprinkle of seasoning can elevate a classic dish to new heights.
Dad Joke #5: What did the financial analyst say when asked about the Idaho-Senators' votes and PLD stock correlation? "Looks like the market is feeling pretty 'gem-nastic'!"
With these diverse perspectives in hand, our journey through the literature sets the stage for a rollicking adventure through the unexpected link between political choices and market repercussions. So, grab your metaphorical hiking boots and join us as we traverse the terrain of Idaho's political landscape and Prologis' stock trajectory, where every twist and turn promises to delight and surprise.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and stock prices—they might seem like strange bedfellows, much like a dad joke and a dad bod. Yet, in the world of financial markets and economic analyses, unexpected correlations often arise, much like how an unexpected punchline can leave you laughing despite yourself. In this paper, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho, also known as the Gem State, and the stock price of Prologis (PLD). As we dive into this peculiar relationship, join us for a journey through the wild landscapes of political and market influences, complete with enough twists and turns to make even the most seasoned hiker dizzy.
Why focus on Idaho, you ask? Well, much like a potato in the pantheon of vegetables, Idaho has its own unique flavor when it comes to politics. Despite its reputation as a reliably Republican state, Idaho's voting patterns have produced some delightful surprises over the years. And speaking of surprises, our research revealed a connection between the rise and fall of Prologis' stock price and the votes cast for Democratic Senators in Idaho that might just leave investors feeling like they've stumbled upon a hidden treasure in the Gem State. After all, who wouldn't be thrilled to uncover a correlation that's more robust than your favorite hiking boots?
So, how did we uncover this unexpected link between politics and market performance? Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we carefully combed through the numbers, looking for patterns that could shed light on the mysterious dance between political inclinations and financial movements. It's a bit like panning for gold, searching for those elusive nuggets of insight that can turn a rocky proposition into a golden opportunity. And just like prospecting for precious metals, our efforts led us to a striking discovery: a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, indicating a potent connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price.
Intrigued? You should be! This unexpected finding sparks a delightful sense of irony, much like stumbling upon a gemstone in a state known for its potatoes. However, before we get ahead of ourselves, let's traverse the terrain of academic literature to provide the context for our inquiries. After all, what's a good adventure without a bit of groundwork to set the stage for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead? And speaking of twists, let's not forget to keep an eye out for those political pivots that might just offer a surprising view of market movements.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather 'round, fellow adventurers, as we unveil the convoluted yet enthralling methodology that guided our exploration into the quirky nexus of democratic voting patterns in Idaho and Prologis' stock price. Our journey begins with the assembly of a motley crew of data sources, scavenged from the depths of the internet – much like a band of treasure hunters seeking riches in uncharted territories. We harnessed the power of MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to capture the political and market landscapes in the span of 2002 to 2020, harnessing their collective wisdom like pieces of a map leading us to hidden financial treasures.
The first step in our intrepid quest involved the intricate art of data wrangling. Much like herding cats, this process required us to corral and organize the wealth of information we unearthed. 'Twas no small feat to transform raw data into a harmonious symphony of statistics, yet we persevered, armed with the patience of a saint and a supremely caffeinated research assistant. We honed our data into a finely crafted shield, ready to fend off the dragons of statistical insignificance and embrace the golden nuggets of correlation that awaited us.
Electric with anticipation, we embarked on a statistical odyssey of epic proportions. Armed with our trusty statistical software and fortified with an abundance of patience, we subjected our data to the rigors of correlation analysis. Like alchemists transmuting base metals into precious gold, we sought to uncover the hidden connections between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and the tumultuous undulations of Prologis' stock price. Every calculation and iteration carried us deeper into the heart of this enigmatic relationship, akin to deciphering the cryptic writings on an ancient treasure map.
As we delved into the realm of statistical significance, we encountered the mighty Pearson correlation coefficient, a measure of the linear relationship between two variables. We scrutinized this numerical paladin, searching for a glimmer of hope signaling a meaningful connection between political leanings in Idaho and the blips and surges of PLD's stock price. The coefficient of 0.9814192 that emerged from the depths of our analysis held promise – a beacon of hope amidst the tempestuous seas of data, illuminating the potential entwining of political fortunes and market destinies.
And now, for our much-anticipated dad joke intermission!
Why did the statistician take a shovel to the data? Because they wanted to dig up some buried treasure – just like our correlation coefficient!
Channeling our inner cartographers, we plotted the significance levels, navigating the treacherous waters of p-values in search of a clear path to enlightenment. Discovering a p-value of less than 0.01, we glimpsed the shores of statistical significance like a distant island emerging through the mist. This finding fortified our resolve, proving that the connection between Democratic votes in Idaho and Prologis' stock price was not merely a mirage but a tangible bridge between the seemingly disparate worlds of politics and real estate.
With our swords of empirical evidence unsheathed, we stand ready to present our hard-won findings, offering a glimpse into the unexpected intersections of political dynamics and market movements. Whether you're a seasoned investor or a scholarly adventurer, we invite you to join us on this exhilarating expedition, where the twists and turns of correlation lead to illuminating vistas and, perhaps, a chuckle or two along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2002 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9814192, r-squared of 0.9631837, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Politics and stock prices—they might seem like strange bedfellows, much like a dad joke and a dad bod. Yet, in the world of financial markets and economic analyses, unexpected correlations often arise, much like how an unexpected punchline can leave you laughing despite yourself. In this paper, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho, also known as the Gem State, and the stock price of Prologis (PLD). As we dive into this peculiar relationship, join us for a journey through the wild landscapes of political and market influences, complete with enough twists and turns to make even the most seasoned hiker dizzy.
Why focus on Idaho, you ask? Well, much like a potato in the pantheon of vegetables, Idaho has its own unique flavor when it comes to politics. Despite its reputation as a reliably Republican state, Idaho's voting patterns have produced some delightful surprises over the years. And speaking of surprises, our research revealed a connection between the rise and fall of Prologis' stock price and the votes cast for Democratic Senators in Idaho that might just leave investors feeling like they've stumbled upon a hidden treasure in the Gem State. After all, who wouldn't be thrilled to uncover a correlation that's more robust than your favorite hiking boots?
So, how did we uncover this unexpected link between politics and market performance? Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we carefully combed through the numbers, looking for patterns that could shed light on the mysterious dance between political inclinations and financial movements. It's a bit like panning for gold, searching for those elusive nuggets of insight that can turn a rocky proposition into a golden opportunity. And just like prospecting for precious metals, our efforts led us to a striking discovery: a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, indicating a potent connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price.
Intrigued? You should be! This unexpected finding sparks a delightful sense of irony, much like stumbling upon a gemstone in a state known for its potatoes. However, before we get ahead of ourselves, let's traverse the terrain of academic literature to provide the context for our inquiries. After all, what's a good adventure without a bit of groundwork to set the stage for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead? And speaking of twists, let's not forget to keep an eye out for those political pivots that might just offer a surprising view of market movements.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD) for the period 2002 to 2020 produced some impressively significant results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192, indicating a strong positive relationship between Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations in Prologis' stock price. It turns out, Idaho's political choices can really make waves in the market - talk about a blue wave with some serious market force!
In addition, the r-squared value of 0.9631837 confirms that a substantial proportion of the variability in Prologis' stock price can be explained by the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho. It's almost like the political landscape of Idaho has been secretly whispering stock market secrets to us all along. Who knew the Gem State had such hidden treasures?
Further adding to the robustness of our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative that there is indeed a significant relationship between these variables. It's as clear as day - or in this case, as clear as Idaho's blue skies - that the political inclinations of the state have a notable impact on the performance of Prologis' stock.
Not to be too boastful, but the connection we uncovered is about as strong as the roots of a potato plant in Idaho's fertile soil. It seems the votes in Idaho have much more than just political power; they seem to have a stock market sway as well. You could say that Idaho's political landscape has been quietly "PLD-ing" the market's movements all along!
[INSERT FIGURE 1: Scatterplot Showing Strong Correlation]
In summary, our research unearthed a compelling link between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price, shedding light on the "blue state blues" that seem to reverberate through the market. Who would have thought that the political leanings of a state known for its potatoes could have such a profound impact on a real estate giant's stock price? It just goes to show that in the world of market analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating results. And speaking of fascinating results, our findings truly are the "tater" to our research salad!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Political Landscape of Idaho," Smith et al. detail the complex interplay of political ideologies within the Gem State, shedding light on the surprising shifts in voter behavior that have left even the most seasoned analysts scratching their heads. This study provides a solid foundation for our exploration, much like a sturdy hiking boot on a rugged trail. The authors unearth some captivating insights into the political dynamics of Idaho, prompting us to venture deeper into the territory of unexpected outcomes.
Dad Joke #1: Why did the market break up with the political poll? It felt like it was getting too "electionic"!
Doe and Jones, in their work "Economic Implications of Political Shifts," further contribute to our understanding of the broader implications of political movements on market behaviors. Their findings underscore the intricate dance between political shifts and economic indicators, much like how a well-timed punchline can change the mood in a room. It's clear that the ramifications of political decisions extend far beyond the ballot box, influencing market fluctuations in ways that are both profound and puzzling.
Dad Joke #2: I told my friend I invested in a company that specializes in building hiking trails. He said it sounded like an uphill business!
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Economics and Politics: A Delicate Balance" by M. E. Nomics offers an insightful examination of the delicate intertwining of political decisions and economic trends. The author's astute analysis provides a lens through which we can view the connections between political developments in Idaho and the movements of Prologis' stock price, much like how a pair of binoculars brings distant landscapes into crisp focus.
Dad Joke #3: What did the economist say when asked about the political impact on market fluctuations? "It's no small feat - it's like trying to predict a-moose-ing behavior in the wild!"
In the realm of fiction, "The Market Maven's Machinations" by Al E. Gory presents an intriguing narrative that, despite its fictional nature, offers tantalizing parallels to the real-world dynamics we seek to untangle. While the characters in the book navigate elaborate plots and schemes, our exploration of the Idaho-Senators' votes and Prologis' stock price may prove to be just as riveting, with unexpected twists that rival the most captivating of page-turners.
Dad Joke #4: Why did the stock portfolio break up with the political forecast? It just couldn't handle the emotional highs and lows!
And as for social media discourse, a tweet from @MarketMaven123 caught our attention, hinting at the possibility of a connection between political undercurrents in Idaho and the performance of PLD stock. While social media may not always be the most scholarly of sources, it certainly adds a touch of contemporary flair to our investigation, much like a sprinkle of seasoning can elevate a classic dish to new heights.
Dad Joke #5: What did the financial analyst say when asked about the Idaho-Senators' votes and PLD stock correlation? "Looks like the market is feeling pretty 'gem-nastic'!"
With these diverse perspectives in hand, our journey through the literature sets the stage for a rollicking adventure through the unexpected link between political choices and market repercussions. So, grab your metaphorical hiking boots and join us as we traverse the terrain of Idaho's political landscape and Prologis' stock trajectory, where every twist and turn promises to delight and surprise.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD) for the period 2002 to 2020 produced some impressively significant results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192, indicating a strong positive relationship between Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations in Prologis' stock price. It turns out, Idaho's political choices can really make waves in the market - talk about a blue wave with some serious market force!
In addition, the r-squared value of 0.9631837 confirms that a substantial proportion of the variability in Prologis' stock price can be explained by the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho. It's almost like the political landscape of Idaho has been secretly whispering stock market secrets to us all along. Who knew the Gem State had such hidden treasures?
Further adding to the robustness of our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative that there is indeed a significant relationship between these variables. It's as clear as day - or in this case, as clear as Idaho's blue skies - that the political inclinations of the state have a notable impact on the performance of Prologis' stock.
Not to be too boastful, but the connection we uncovered is about as strong as the roots of a potato plant in Idaho's fertile soil. It seems the votes in Idaho have much more than just political power; they seem to have a stock market sway as well. You could say that Idaho's political landscape has been quietly "PLD-ing" the market's movements all along!
[INSERT FIGURE 1: Scatterplot Showing Strong Correlation]
In summary, our research unearthed a compelling link between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price, shedding light on the "blue state blues" that seem to reverberate through the market. Who would have thought that the political leanings of a state known for its potatoes could have such a profound impact on a real estate giant's stock price? It just goes to show that in the world of market analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating results. And speaking of fascinating results, our findings truly are the "tater" to our research salad!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study have not only validated but also significantly strengthened the existing literature supporting the influence of political decisions on market behavior. The correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 between Democratic support in Idaho and Prologis' stock price aligns closely with the previous works that highlighted the intricate relationship between political leanings and economic trends. Much like the intricate dance between the potato harvest and market demand for French fries, the correlation we uncovered speaks volumes about the far-reaching impact of political choices on market dynamics.
In line with Doe and Jones' work on the economic implications of political shifts, our research highlights the substantial role political movements play in influencing market behavior. In a way, each vote for Democratic Senators in Idaho seems to act as a tiny, yet potent, nudge for the stock price of Prologis. It's as if the political landscape of Idaho has been playing a high-stakes game of chess with the stock market, making astute moves that sway market sentiments. Who would have thought that potatoes weren't the only things shaking and stirring things up in Idaho?
The r-squared value of 0.9631837 reaffirms the magnitude of the influence of Democratic support in Idaho on the fluctuations in Prologis' stock price, echoing the intricate dance between political shifts and market behaviors as elucidated by Nomics. This substantial proportion of variability in the stock price, attributed to the political preferences of Idahoans, underscores the undeniable significance of political decisions in shaping market trends. In this sense, Idaho's political landscape offers not only scenic beauty but also a profound impact on market trajectories.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the substantial relationship between Democratic votes in Idaho and Prologis' stock price. It's almost as if the political inclinations of Idaho have been secretly pulling the strings behind the scenes, impacting the stock market in ways that were previously unnoticed. Who would have guessed that the political winds blowing through the Gem State could carry such potent market forces?
Our results, much like a well-timed dad joke, reveal unexpected but undeniably substantial connections. The implications of our study stretch beyond mere statistical discoveries; they open a window into the intricate interplay between political decisions and market movements. So, next time someone wonders about the relationship between blue states and real estate, we can confidently assert that it's not just a whimsical allegory – it's a statistically significant phenomenon with tangible effects. And if our findings could speak, they’d probably say, "Looks like Idaho's political landscape has been a real PLD-all along!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Politics and stock prices—they might seem like strange bedfellows, much like a dad joke and a dad bod. Yet, in the world of financial markets and economic analyses, unexpected correlations often arise, much like how an unexpected punchline can leave you laughing despite yourself. In this paper, we explore the surprising connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho, also known as the Gem State, and the stock price of Prologis (PLD). As we dive into this peculiar relationship, join us for a journey through the wild landscapes of political and market influences, complete with enough twists and turns to make even the most seasoned hiker dizzy.
Why focus on Idaho, you ask? Well, much like a potato in the pantheon of vegetables, Idaho has its own unique flavor when it comes to politics. Despite its reputation as a reliably Republican state, Idaho's voting patterns have produced some delightful surprises over the years. And speaking of surprises, our research revealed a connection between the rise and fall of Prologis' stock price and the votes cast for Democratic Senators in Idaho that might just leave investors feeling like they've stumbled upon a hidden treasure in the Gem State. After all, who wouldn't be thrilled to uncover a correlation that's more robust than your favorite hiking boots?
So, how did we uncover this unexpected link between politics and market performance? Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we carefully combed through the numbers, looking for patterns that could shed light on the mysterious dance between political inclinations and financial movements. It's a bit like panning for gold, searching for those elusive nuggets of insight that can turn a rocky proposition into a golden opportunity. And just like prospecting for precious metals, our efforts led us to a striking discovery: a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, indicating a potent connection between the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price.
Intrigued? You should be! This unexpected finding sparks a delightful sense of irony, much like stumbling upon a gemstone in a state known for its potatoes. However, before we get ahead of ourselves, let's traverse the terrain of academic literature to provide the context for our inquiries. After all, what's a good adventure without a bit of groundwork to set the stage for the unexpected twists and turns that lie ahead? And speaking of twists, let's not forget to keep an eye out for those political pivots that might just offer a surprising view of market movements.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and Prologis' stock price (PLD) for the period 2002 to 2020 produced some impressively significant results. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9814192, indicating a strong positive relationship between Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations in Prologis' stock price. It turns out, Idaho's political choices can really make waves in the market - talk about a blue wave with some serious market force!
In addition, the r-squared value of 0.9631837 confirms that a substantial proportion of the variability in Prologis' stock price can be explained by the votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho. It's almost like the political landscape of Idaho has been secretly whispering stock market secrets to us all along. Who knew the Gem State had such hidden treasures?
Further adding to the robustness of our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative that there is indeed a significant relationship between these variables. It's as clear as day - or in this case, as clear as Idaho's blue skies - that the political inclinations of the state have a notable impact on the performance of Prologis' stock.
Not to be too boastful, but the connection we uncovered is about as strong as the roots of a potato plant in Idaho's fertile soil. It seems the votes in Idaho have much more than just political power; they seem to have a stock market sway as well. You could say that Idaho's political landscape has been quietly "PLD-ing" the market's movements all along!
[INSERT FIGURE 1: Scatterplot Showing Strong Correlation]
In summary, our research unearthed a compelling link between Democratic votes for Senators in Idaho and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price, shedding light on the "blue state blues" that seem to reverberate through the market. Who would have thought that the political leanings of a state known for its potatoes could have such a profound impact on a real estate giant's stock price? It just goes to show that in the world of market analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating results. And speaking of fascinating results, our findings truly are the "tater" to our research salad!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has uncovered a remarkable connection between Democratic Senatorial votes in Idaho and the stock price of Prologis (PLD), highlighting the unexpected influence of political choices on market dynamics. Our findings, with a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 and a p-value of less than 0.01, provide compelling evidence of this intriguing relationship. It seems that Idaho's political landscape has been quietly "PLD-ing" the market's movements all along! It's a revelation that proves that in the world of data analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating results.
Furthermore, our study offers a new perspective on the intersection of politics and finance, showcasing how seemingly unrelated elements can have a significant impact on each other, much like how a well-timed dad joke can liven up a serious conversation. These results highlight the need for further exploration into the intricate connections between seemingly disparate factors, reminding us that there's always more than meets the eye - quite the revelation, just like finding a hidden gem in a field of potatoes!
In light of our groundbreaking findings, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. Our study has brought to light the potent influence of political choices in Idaho on the stock price of Prologis, providing a solid foundation for future analyses. It seems we've peeled back the layers of Idaho's political landscape to reveal a market force that's been cooking up surprises all along - a fitting conclusion, don't you think?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD). Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Political Economy and Real Estate Dynamics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD). Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Intergalactic Policy Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD) with an abstract of In this research, we delve into the curious relationship between the Democratic support in the Gem State and the fluctuations of Prologis' stock price. Armed with data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a quest to uncover the connection between political leanings and market tendencies. Our findings revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9814192 with p < 0.01, suggesting a robust link between the two. It's safe to say that political decisions can pack quite the market punch - an effect you can say is quite "stocking"! Rest assured, our study leaves no stone unturned... or should we say "gem"?
ChatGPT:
Democratic support, Democratic Senatorial votes, Idaho, Prologis stock price, PLD stock, stock market correlation, political leanings, market tendencies, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, market impact of political decisions
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for Democratic Senators in IdahoDetailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Idaho
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho
Prologis' stock price (PLD)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Prologis (PLD) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with Prologis' stock price (PLD)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9631837 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Prologis' stock price (PLD)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho) over the 6 years from 2002 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00051. 0.0005146601439031810000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.051% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,943 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.83, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2008 | 2010 | 2014 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho (Total votes) | 132975 | 219903 | 112057 | 151574 | 188249 | 285864 |
Prologis' stock price (PLD) (Stock price) | 26 | 57.48 | 25.76 | 36.99 | 42.36 | 89.67 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
- Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([132975,219903,112057,151574,188249,285864,])
array_2 = np.array([26,57.48,25.76,36.99,42.36,89.67,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho"
array_2_name = "Prologis' stock price (PLD)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho
- Line chart for only Prologis' stock price (PLD)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Blue State Blues and Real Estate Views: The Impact of Democratic Senatorial Votes in Idaho on Prologis' Stock Price (PLD)
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 5802 · Black Variable ID: 26228 · Red Variable ID: 1620