Download png, svg
AI explanation
As Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire decreased, so did the intensity of political debates. With fewer fiery discussions, the overall climate cooled down. This unexpected chill made it uncomfortable for carjackers to continue their activities, leading to a nationwide decrease in carjackings. Who knew that political preferences in a small state could have such a chilling effect on crime waves across the country?Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a lighthearted scene in a New Hampshire town square, where a group of former fiery political debaters engage in a comical exchange of ideas. The setting should reflect a chill in the climate, with a relaxed atmosphere. As the atmosphere cools down, have the image include a humorous detail such as carjackers awkwardly shivering in their attempts to operate, resulting in a decrease in carjackings nationwide. This imaginative scene should capture the quirky and unexpected connection between political shifts and criminal activity, resembling a humorous Reddit post. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Cyber folk a Polaroid photo A scene from Skyrim a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US, in the following situation: As Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire decreased, so did the intensity of political debates. With fewer fiery discussions, the overall climate cooled down. This unexpected chill made it uncomfortable for carjackers to continue their activities, leading to a nationwide decrease in carjackings. Who knew that political preferences in a small state could have such a chilling effect on crime waves across the country? . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In New Hampshire, as the Votes for Libertarian Senators decreased, the political debates lost their intensity. The once fiery discussions cooled down, creating a chill in the overall climate. This unexpected change made it uncomfortable for carjackers to continue, resulting in a decrease in carjackings nationwide.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In New Hampshire, as the Votes for Libertarian Senators decreased, the political debates lost their intensity. The once fiery discussions cooled down, creating a chill in the overall climate. This unexpected change made it uncomfortable for carjackers to continue, resulting in a decrease in carjackings nationwide. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a lighthearted scene in a New Hampshire town square, where a group of former fiery political debaters engage in a comical exchange of ideas. The setting should reflect a chill in the climate, with a relaxed atmosphere. As the atmosphere cools down, have the image include a humorous detail such as carjackers awkwardly shivering in their attempts to operate, resulting in a decrease in carjackings nationwide. This imaginative scene should capture the quirky and unexpected connection between political shifts and criminal activity, resembling a humorous Reddit post.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire caused Carjackings in the US to decrease. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
The Live Free or Carjack Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US The Journal of Political Criminology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Justice Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and p < 0.05 for 1995 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
The relationship between political ideology and societal outcomes has been a topic of considerable interest and debate. While much attention has been paid to the influence of political beliefs on policy decisions and macro-level economic indicators, little research has delved into the potential connection between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the broader United States. This paper aims to address this intriguing association and explore the nuanced dynamics at play.
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma, as we playfully dub it, implicates the intersection of political philosophy and criminal behavior. The paradoxical juxtaposition of advocating for personal freedom with the criminal act of carjacking presents a curious avenue for investigation. While prior literature has primarily examined the link between ideological stances and policy implications, our study takes a distinctive turn by examining the potential impact of libertarian votes on criminal activities, specifically car theft through force or intimidation.
The present research harnesses data acquired from diverse sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Our rigorous methodology covers a time span ranging from 1995 to 2020, encompassing a broad swath of political and criminal trends. Through an exhaustive analysis of these datasets, our study uncovers a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a robust relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the broader United States.
The unexpected nature of these findings demands thoughtful consideration, prompting us to ponder the potential implications of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. It is a deviation from the customary narrative, sparking intrigue about the underlying mechanisms driving this association. The discerned correlation directs attention to the unexplored territory of political preferences and crime trends, raising questions about the multifaceted relationship between individualistic ideologies and illicit activities. This unearths a facet of societal dynamics that has hitherto been overlooked, underscoring the need for comprehensive inquiry and deeper understanding.
As such, The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma underscores a hitherto unacknowledged interplay between political undercurrents and felonious endeavors, presenting a unique and thought-provoking avenue for scholarly investigation. This paper endeavors to unravel this captivating connection and shed light on the intricate interweaving of political preferences and criminal conduct, bringing a fresh perspective to the discourse on political ideology and its repercussions.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political ideology and societal outcomes has been a topic of considerable interest and debate. While much attention has been paid to the influence of political beliefs on policy decisions and macro-level economic indicators, little research has delved into the potential connection between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the broader United States. This paper aims to address this intriguing association and explore the nuanced dynamics at play.
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma, as we playfully dub it, implicates the intersection of political philosophy and criminal behavior. The paradoxical juxtaposition of advocating for personal freedom with the criminal act of carjacking presents a curious avenue for investigation. While prior literature has primarily examined the link between ideological stances and policy implications, our study takes a distinctive turn by examining the potential impact of libertarian votes on criminal activities, specifically car theft through force or intimidation.
The present research harnesses data acquired from diverse sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Our rigorous methodology covers a time span ranging from 1995 to 2020, encompassing a broad swath of political and criminal trends. Through an exhaustive analysis of these datasets, our study uncovers a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a robust relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the broader United States.
The unexpected nature of these findings demands thoughtful consideration, prompting us to ponder the potential implications of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. It is a deviation from the customary narrative, sparking intrigue about the underlying mechanisms driving this association. The discerned correlation directs attention to the unexplored territory of political preferences and crime trends, raising questions about the multifaceted relationship between individualistic ideologies and illicit activities. This unearths a facet of societal dynamics that has hitherto been overlooked, underscoring the need for comprehensive inquiry and deeper understanding.
As such, The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma underscores a hitherto unacknowledged interplay between political undercurrents and felonious endeavors, presenting a unique and thought-provoking avenue for scholarly investigation. This paper endeavors to unravel this captivating connection and shed light on the intricate interweaving of political preferences and criminal conduct, bringing a fresh perspective to the discourse on political ideology and its repercussions.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Libertarian Votes and Carjackings: An Analysis of Data from New Hampshire and Beyond," Smith et al. analyze the correlation between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Through meticulous examination of state-level voting records and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting database, the authors discern a notable positive relationship between these variables. However, this initial exploration of the Live Free or Carjack phenomenon merely scratches the surface of this complex and curious association.
Moving beyond traditional political and criminological literature, Doe et al. explore the sociopolitical ramifications of libertarianism in "Individual Liberty and Vehicular Theft: Unearthing the Libertarian-Carjacking Nexus." Their work delves into the ideological underpinnings of libertarian philosophy and its potential impact on criminal behavior, providing intriguing insights into the intersection of personal freedom and felony vehicular theft. Though the findings are thought-provoking, they beckon further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play.
Jones et al. contribute to the discourse with "Autonomy and Auto Theft: A Libertarian Lens on Carjackings." In their analysis, the authors employ a multidisciplinary approach, integrating political theory, criminology, and behavioral economics to scrutinize the relationship between Libertarian votes in New Hampshire and nationwide carjacking incidents. Their comprehensive investigation reveals a robust statistical association, engendering novel perspectives on the interplay between political preferences and criminal activities.
Beyond the confines of academic research, several non-fiction works provide valuable insights into the intricacies of political ideology and criminal conduct. "Freedom and Felonies: Exploring the Paradox of Libertarianism and Vehicular Theft" by Lorem Ipsum offers a comprehensive overview of the historical and philosophical foundations of libertarianism and its implications for illicit vehicular appropriation. Additionally, "The Carjacker's Manifesto: A Critical Examination of Political Discontent and Vehicular Acquisition" by Sit Amet delves into the psychological motivations that underpin carjacking incidents, offering a fascinating exploration of the intersection between personal autonomy and criminal behavior.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the works of renowned authors such as Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle, while not explicitly delving into the nuances of libertarianism and carjacking, offer captivating insights into criminal motivations and the complexities of human behavior. The classic tale of "The Carjacking of the Baskervilles" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, although fictitious, presents a compelling narrative that underscores the enigmatic nature of vehicular theft and the underlying societal dynamics at play. Similarly, Agatha Christie's "Carjacking on the Orient Express" weaves a gripping tale of intrigue and illicit auto appropriation, providing a fictional lens through which to contemplate the intersection of political ideology and criminal activities.
Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, the strategic challenges inherent in titles such as "Automobile Larcenist: The Libertarian Edition" and "Criminal Conundrum: The New Hampshire Nexus" underscore the multifaceted dynamics of vehicular theft and the potential impact of political undercurrents on criminal behavior, offering a playful yet insightful vantage point from which to ponder the Live Free or Carjack dilemma.
As we navigate the extensive body of literature and diverse perspectives on the peculiar relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States, it becomes evident that this intersection of political philosophy and criminal conduct warrants further investigation and contemplation. The range of scholarly, non-fiction, and fictional contributions to this discourse underscores the intricate and thought-provoking nature of this fascinating association, opening avenues for additional research and scholarly inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Justice Statistics . You used data from 1995 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between political ideology and societal outcomes has been a topic of considerable interest and debate. While much attention has been paid to the influence of political beliefs on policy decisions and macro-level economic indicators, little research has delved into the potential connection between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the broader United States. This paper aims to address this intriguing association and explore the nuanced dynamics at play.
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma, as we playfully dub it, implicates the intersection of political philosophy and criminal behavior. The paradoxical juxtaposition of advocating for personal freedom with the criminal act of carjacking presents a curious avenue for investigation. While prior literature has primarily examined the link between ideological stances and policy implications, our study takes a distinctive turn by examining the potential impact of libertarian votes on criminal activities, specifically car theft through force or intimidation.
The present research harnesses data acquired from diverse sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Our rigorous methodology covers a time span ranging from 1995 to 2020, encompassing a broad swath of political and criminal trends. Through an exhaustive analysis of these datasets, our study uncovers a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a robust relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the broader United States.
The unexpected nature of these findings demands thoughtful consideration, prompting us to ponder the potential implications of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. It is a deviation from the customary narrative, sparking intrigue about the underlying mechanisms driving this association. The discerned correlation directs attention to the unexplored territory of political preferences and crime trends, raising questions about the multifaceted relationship between individualistic ideologies and illicit activities. This unearths a facet of societal dynamics that has hitherto been overlooked, underscoring the need for comprehensive inquiry and deeper understanding.
As such, The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma underscores a hitherto unacknowledged interplay between political undercurrents and felonious endeavors, presenting a unique and thought-provoking avenue for scholarly investigation. This paper endeavors to unravel this captivating connection and shed light on the intricate interweaving of political preferences and criminal conduct, bringing a fresh perspective to the discourse on political ideology and its repercussions.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
The current research assembles an extensive dataset comprising the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. These data were meticulously gleaned from reputable sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The period under scrutiny spans from 1995 to 2020, offering a comprehensive overview of political and criminal trends during this time frame.
The dataset was acquired through a rigorous combing of the aforementioned sources, ensuring the inclusion of reliable and accurate information. However, it is important to note that the retrieval process was not without its challenges, akin to embarking on a scavenger hunt in the labyrinthine corridors of internet repositories. Nevertheless, the research team navigated these virtual mazes adeptly, emerging victorious with a trove of pertinent data.
Data Analysis:
The collected data underwent a meticulous process of cleaning, verification, and organization, akin to the meticulous sorting of a library's eclectic collection. Once appropriately tidied, the data were subjected to a battery of statistical analyses to unravel potential patterns and correlations.
The first step involved calculating the correlation coefficient between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. This coefficient served as a quantitative measure of the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables under scrutiny. The statistical software employed in this endeavor performed admirably, akin to a virtuoso pianist weaving a complex concerto from the notes of disparate datasets.
Subsequently, a p-value was derived to assess the statistical significance of the observed relationship. The p-value, a quintessentially capricious statistical construct, danced on the threshold of significance, demanding a keen eye for discerning validity amidst the mélange of data points. Ultimately, the p-value yielded a result of less than 0.05, signaling a statistically significant relationship that bypassed the stringent scrutiny of hypothesis testing.
In summary, the data collection and analysis processes culminated in the unearthing of a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and a statistically significant p-value, substantiating the noteworthy relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. This outcome piques curiosity and proffers a compelling impetus for further scholarly exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Justice Statistics .
For the time period 1995 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8305652, r-squared of 0.6898385, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between political ideology and societal outcomes has been a topic of considerable interest and debate. While much attention has been paid to the influence of political beliefs on policy decisions and macro-level economic indicators, little research has delved into the potential connection between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the broader United States. This paper aims to address this intriguing association and explore the nuanced dynamics at play.
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma, as we playfully dub it, implicates the intersection of political philosophy and criminal behavior. The paradoxical juxtaposition of advocating for personal freedom with the criminal act of carjacking presents a curious avenue for investigation. While prior literature has primarily examined the link between ideological stances and policy implications, our study takes a distinctive turn by examining the potential impact of libertarian votes on criminal activities, specifically car theft through force or intimidation.
The present research harnesses data acquired from diverse sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Our rigorous methodology covers a time span ranging from 1995 to 2020, encompassing a broad swath of political and criminal trends. Through an exhaustive analysis of these datasets, our study uncovers a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a robust relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the broader United States.
The unexpected nature of these findings demands thoughtful consideration, prompting us to ponder the potential implications of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. It is a deviation from the customary narrative, sparking intrigue about the underlying mechanisms driving this association. The discerned correlation directs attention to the unexplored territory of political preferences and crime trends, raising questions about the multifaceted relationship between individualistic ideologies and illicit activities. This unearths a facet of societal dynamics that has hitherto been overlooked, underscoring the need for comprehensive inquiry and deeper understanding.
As such, The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma underscores a hitherto unacknowledged interplay between political undercurrents and felonious endeavors, presenting a unique and thought-provoking avenue for scholarly investigation. This paper endeavors to unravel this captivating connection and shed light on the intricate interweaving of political preferences and criminal conduct, bringing a fresh perspective to the discourse on political ideology and its repercussions.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States over the period of 1995 to 2020 yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8305652, indicating a strong association between these two variables. The r-squared value of 0.6898385 further suggests that approximately 68.98% of the variability in carjackings can be explained by the variability in Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, reinforcing the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
The striking correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena invites intriguing speculation and raises eyebrow. It seems that the Live Free or Die state's political leanings may be influencing the penchant for carjacking nationwide, in an odd twist that combines political philosophy and felonious behavior. The unexpected nature of these findings beckons an era of academic reflection, serving as a conversation starter for tailored probing into the latent implications of political ideology on vehicular theft through intimidation.
Unearthing this correlation brought to light an intersection not previously considered, urging scholarly scrutiny into the nuanced interactions between individualistic political inclinations and criminal activities. The connection revealed in this study challenges conventional assumptions and propels the discourse into a realm where political beliefs and criminal actions collide.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the notably strong correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States, serving as a visual testament to the robust relationship uncovered in this study.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Libertarian Votes and Carjackings: An Analysis of Data from New Hampshire and Beyond," Smith et al. analyze the correlation between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the occurrence of carjackings in the United States. Through meticulous examination of state-level voting records and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting database, the authors discern a notable positive relationship between these variables. However, this initial exploration of the Live Free or Carjack phenomenon merely scratches the surface of this complex and curious association.
Moving beyond traditional political and criminological literature, Doe et al. explore the sociopolitical ramifications of libertarianism in "Individual Liberty and Vehicular Theft: Unearthing the Libertarian-Carjacking Nexus." Their work delves into the ideological underpinnings of libertarian philosophy and its potential impact on criminal behavior, providing intriguing insights into the intersection of personal freedom and felony vehicular theft. Though the findings are thought-provoking, they beckon further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms at play.
Jones et al. contribute to the discourse with "Autonomy and Auto Theft: A Libertarian Lens on Carjackings." In their analysis, the authors employ a multidisciplinary approach, integrating political theory, criminology, and behavioral economics to scrutinize the relationship between Libertarian votes in New Hampshire and nationwide carjacking incidents. Their comprehensive investigation reveals a robust statistical association, engendering novel perspectives on the interplay between political preferences and criminal activities.
Beyond the confines of academic research, several non-fiction works provide valuable insights into the intricacies of political ideology and criminal conduct. "Freedom and Felonies: Exploring the Paradox of Libertarianism and Vehicular Theft" by Lorem Ipsum offers a comprehensive overview of the historical and philosophical foundations of libertarianism and its implications for illicit vehicular appropriation. Additionally, "The Carjacker's Manifesto: A Critical Examination of Political Discontent and Vehicular Acquisition" by Sit Amet delves into the psychological motivations that underpin carjacking incidents, offering a fascinating exploration of the intersection between personal autonomy and criminal behavior.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the works of renowned authors such as Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle, while not explicitly delving into the nuances of libertarianism and carjacking, offer captivating insights into criminal motivations and the complexities of human behavior. The classic tale of "The Carjacking of the Baskervilles" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, although fictitious, presents a compelling narrative that underscores the enigmatic nature of vehicular theft and the underlying societal dynamics at play. Similarly, Agatha Christie's "Carjacking on the Orient Express" weaves a gripping tale of intrigue and illicit auto appropriation, providing a fictional lens through which to contemplate the intersection of political ideology and criminal activities.
Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, the strategic challenges inherent in titles such as "Automobile Larcenist: The Libertarian Edition" and "Criminal Conundrum: The New Hampshire Nexus" underscore the multifaceted dynamics of vehicular theft and the potential impact of political undercurrents on criminal behavior, offering a playful yet insightful vantage point from which to ponder the Live Free or Carjack dilemma.
As we navigate the extensive body of literature and diverse perspectives on the peculiar relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States, it becomes evident that this intersection of political philosophy and criminal conduct warrants further investigation and contemplation. The range of scholarly, non-fiction, and fictional contributions to this discourse underscores the intricate and thought-provoking nature of this fascinating association, opening avenues for additional research and scholarly inquiry.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States over the period of 1995 to 2020 yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8305652, indicating a strong association between these two variables. The r-squared value of 0.6898385 further suggests that approximately 68.98% of the variability in carjackings can be explained by the variability in Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, reinforcing the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
The striking correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena invites intriguing speculation and raises eyebrow. It seems that the Live Free or Die state's political leanings may be influencing the penchant for carjacking nationwide, in an odd twist that combines political philosophy and felonious behavior. The unexpected nature of these findings beckons an era of academic reflection, serving as a conversation starter for tailored probing into the latent implications of political ideology on vehicular theft through intimidation.
Unearthing this correlation brought to light an intersection not previously considered, urging scholarly scrutiny into the nuanced interactions between individualistic political inclinations and criminal activities. The connection revealed in this study challenges conventional assumptions and propels the discourse into a realm where political beliefs and criminal actions collide.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the notably strong correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States, serving as a visual testament to the robust relationship uncovered in this study.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study demonstrate a remarkable correlation between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. This unexpected association raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal activities. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value support the notion that there may indeed be a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and the occurrence of carjackings.
The results of this investigation align with previous research that has hinted at the curious connection between political preferences and criminal behavior. Notably, the work of Smith et al. and Jones et al. unearthed similar positive relationships between Libertarian votes and carjacking incidents. The current study builds upon these earlier findings, offering additional empirical evidence to support the existence of this intriguing association. Furthermore, the broader literature review, including the unconventional insights from Lorem Ipsum and the narrative provocations of Agatha Christie and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, has contributed to the multidimensional understanding of this complex phenomenon.
While the correlation uncovered in this study is striking, it is essential to approach the interpretation of these results with caution. The correlation does not imply causation, and further research is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms through which political ideology may influence criminal behavior. Moreover, it is imperative to consider potential confounding variables and alternative explanations that may account for the observed relationship.
The paradoxical nature of the Live Free or Carjack dilemma invites whimsical contemplation about the influence of political sentiments on auto-appropriative inclinations. The unexpected relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings on a national scale adds a peculiar dimension to the discourse on political ideology and criminal conduct. The intersection of these seemingly disparate domains provides fertile ground for future research endeavors and theoretical inquiries, enlivening the scholarly conversation with its thought-provoking implications.
In conclusion, the correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States uncovered in this study challenges conventional assumptions and introduces a novel dimension to the understanding of the interplay between political philosophy and criminal activities. The unexpected nature of this association serves as a catalyst for further scholarly exploration, beckoning the academic community to delve deeper into the nuanced complexities of this intriguing phenomenon.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between political ideology and societal outcomes has been a topic of considerable interest and debate. While much attention has been paid to the influence of political beliefs on policy decisions and macro-level economic indicators, little research has delved into the potential connection between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the broader United States. This paper aims to address this intriguing association and explore the nuanced dynamics at play.
The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma, as we playfully dub it, implicates the intersection of political philosophy and criminal behavior. The paradoxical juxtaposition of advocating for personal freedom with the criminal act of carjacking presents a curious avenue for investigation. While prior literature has primarily examined the link between ideological stances and policy implications, our study takes a distinctive turn by examining the potential impact of libertarian votes on criminal activities, specifically car theft through force or intimidation.
The present research harnesses data acquired from diverse sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Our rigorous methodology covers a time span ranging from 1995 to 2020, encompassing a broad swath of political and criminal trends. Through an exhaustive analysis of these datasets, our study uncovers a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a robust relationship between libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the broader United States.
The unexpected nature of these findings demands thoughtful consideration, prompting us to ponder the potential implications of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. It is a deviation from the customary narrative, sparking intrigue about the underlying mechanisms driving this association. The discerned correlation directs attention to the unexplored territory of political preferences and crime trends, raising questions about the multifaceted relationship between individualistic ideologies and illicit activities. This unearths a facet of societal dynamics that has hitherto been overlooked, underscoring the need for comprehensive inquiry and deeper understanding.
As such, The "Live Free or Carjack" Dilemma underscores a hitherto unacknowledged interplay between political undercurrents and felonious endeavors, presenting a unique and thought-provoking avenue for scholarly investigation. This paper endeavors to unravel this captivating connection and shed light on the intricate interweaving of political preferences and criminal conduct, bringing a fresh perspective to the discourse on political ideology and its repercussions.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States over the period of 1995 to 2020 yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8305652, indicating a strong association between these two variables. The r-squared value of 0.6898385 further suggests that approximately 68.98% of the variability in carjackings can be explained by the variability in Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, reinforcing the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
The striking correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena invites intriguing speculation and raises eyebrow. It seems that the Live Free or Die state's political leanings may be influencing the penchant for carjacking nationwide, in an odd twist that combines political philosophy and felonious behavior. The unexpected nature of these findings beckons an era of academic reflection, serving as a conversation starter for tailored probing into the latent implications of political ideology on vehicular theft through intimidation.
Unearthing this correlation brought to light an intersection not previously considered, urging scholarly scrutiny into the nuanced interactions between individualistic political inclinations and criminal activities. The connection revealed in this study challenges conventional assumptions and propels the discourse into a realm where political beliefs and criminal actions collide.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the notably strong correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States, serving as a visual testament to the robust relationship uncovered in this study.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the "Live Free or Carjack" dilemma presents a perplexing correlation between Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and carjackings in the United States. The substantial correlation coefficient, coupled with the statistically significant p-value, unequivocally underscores the robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. It appears that the Live Free or Die state's political leanings may be exerting an unexpected influence on vehicular theft on a national scale, forming a peculiar nexus between political philosophy and criminal behavior. The uncanny connection uncovered in this study amplifies the need for a deeper understanding of the intersections between ideological proclivities and illicit activities, prompting a reevaluation of the traditional discourse on the repercussions of political beliefs.
The findings shed light on an unforeseen dimension of sociopolitical dynamics, calling for further investigation into the potential ramifications of libertarian ideology on criminal conduct. The unanticipated nature of this correlation invites contemplation of the intricate mechanisms underlying the relationship between individualistic political preferences and felonious endeavors. This revelatory discovery, while initially confounding, serves as a catalyst for renewed scholarly inquiry into the intricate interplay of political ideologies and societal outcomes. The results underscore the need for a reexamination of the intersection between political philosophy and criminal behavior, propelling the academic community into a realm of interdisciplinary exploration and critical analysis.
It must be emphasized that the distinctive nature of these findings necessitates a shift in the scholarly discourse, encouraging a comprehensive reassessment of the complex interrelationships between political orientations and criminal activities. The surprising correlation uncovered in this study challenges conventional assumptions, prompting a reevaluation of the nuanced dynamics at play. Nevertheless, it is important to note that while these results offer intriguing insights, they represent only a preliminary exploration of the "Live Free or Carjack" dilemma. Further research encompassing a broader spectrum of variables and contexts is warranted to corroborate and expand upon the implications of our findings.
Conclusively, the "Live Free or Carjack" dilemma provokes contemplation and raises provocative questions about the potential influence of political ideologies on criminal behaviors. The results of this study necessitate a paradigm shift in the examination of the complex interplay between political preferences and societal outcomes, but also provoke cheeky questions about whether "liberty" in New Hampshire extends to one's choice of vehicles. In light of these revelations, the current study serves as a springboard for future investigations, urging scholars to delve deeper into the quirky interactions between political philosophies and criminal propensities. Hence, no more research is needed in this area.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Live Free or Carjack Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Political Criminology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Live Free or Carjack Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Rationality and Societal Impacts
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Live Free or Carjack Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US with an abstract of This research paper investigates the intriguing association between the number of Libertarian votes for Senators in New Hampshire and the incidence of carjackings in the United States. Leveraging data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, our study spans the years 1995 to 2020. Through meticulous analysis, our research team unearthed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8305652 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.
While the outcomes may appear perplexing at first glance, the data paints a thought-provoking picture, raising questions about the potential influence of libertarian ideology on criminal behavior. The findings imply a relationship between advocating for individual liberties and incidents of vehicle theft – a correlation that certainly drives the conversation in a unique direction. This research sheds light on an unexpected relationship and prompts further examination of the peculiar intersection between political preferences and crime trends.
ChatGPT:
libertarian votes, Senators, New Hampshire, carjackings, United States, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Bureau of Justice Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, libertarian ideology, criminal behavior, individual liberties, vehicle theft, political preferences, crime trends
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for Libertarian Senators in New HampshireDetailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Libertarian Senate candidates in New Hampshire
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire
Carjackings in the US
Detailed data title: Rate of nonfatal carjacking victimization per 1,000 persons age 16 or older (3-year moving averages)
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics
See what else correlates with Carjackings in the US
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6898385 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Carjackings in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire) over the 7 years from 1995 through 2020.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0207. 0.0206707821402734340000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 2.07% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 48 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.21, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1996 | 1998 | 2002 | 2008 | 2010 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire (Percentage of votes) | 4.52576 | 2.41598 | 2.19956 | 3.09678 | 1.04528 | 1.70428 | 2.31445 |
Carjackings in the US (Carjackings) | 0.48 | 0.3 | 0.19 | 0.185 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.1 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.52576,2.41598,2.19956,3.09678,1.04528,1.70428,2.31445,])
array_2 = np.array([0.48,0.3,0.19,0.185,0.13,0.11,0.1,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Carjackings in the US"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for Libertarian Senators in New Hampshire
- Line chart for only Carjackings in the US
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Live Free or Carjack Dilemma: Examining the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Carjackings in the US
Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!
Correlation ID: 5811 · Black Variable ID: 26426 · Red Variable ID: 1200