Report an error
Total comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Biomass power generated in Mali | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of preschool teachers in Florida | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Costa Rica | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of event planners in Pennsylvania | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in Cote d'Ivoire | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Associates degrees awarded in Music and dance | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Colt | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| The number of building inspectors in West Virginia | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of public school students in 8th grade | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
| Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'yeet' | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
Total comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)