about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,610 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Nevada and the second variable is Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon.  The chart goes from 1987 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

At first, this may seem unrelated, but hear me out. As the number of intentionally lit fires in Nevada decreased, there was a surplus of unemployed arsonists. Without their usual outlets for fiery mayhem, these disgruntled individuals decided to put their skills to use in the Brazilian Amazon. The result? A decrease in remaining forest cover as these rogue arsonists brought their destructive expertise to the lush greenery. Remember, only you can prevent forest fires and unemployed arsonists with a passion for combustion.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover that depicts a devastating scene: In the dry Nevada desert, a wildfire rages uncontrollably, casting a fiery glow over the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. The flames consume acres of trees, emphasizing the impact of arson in Nevada and the destruction of the Amazon. The image should highlight the contrast between the arid desert landscape and the lush rainforest, with the flames serving as a stark reminder of the environmental threat. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave a Polaroid photo Vaporwave A TIME magazine cover image Concept art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the dry Nevada desert, a wildfire blazes out of control, engulfing acres of trees in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. The flames cast an eerie glow over the dwindling forest cover, bringing attention to the impact of arson in Nevada and the destruction of the Amazon.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the dry Nevada desert, a wildfire blazes out of control, engulfing acres of trees in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. The flames cast an eerie glow over the dwindling forest cover, bringing attention to the impact of arson in Nevada and the destruction of the Amazon. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover that depicts a devastating scene: In the dry Nevada desert, a wildfire rages uncontrollably, casting a fiery glow over the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. The flames consume acres of trees, emphasizing the impact of arson in Nevada and the destruction of the Amazon. The image should highlight the contrast between the arid desert landscape and the lush rainforest, with the flames serving as a stark reminder of the environmental threat.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Nevada caused Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

The Journal of Pyroecology and Ecological Pyrotechnics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Mongabay to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and p < 0.01 for 1987 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The scintillating dance of fire has captivated human curiosity since time immemorial. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has unfortunately been a persistent menace, causing significant economic and social disruptions. On the other hand, the magnificent green expanse of the Amazonian rainforest has been a subject of fascination and concern for environmentalists and policymakers alike, given its significant ecological and climatic influence.

The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate elements – arson in the deserts of Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon – has sparked our interest in examining potential connections between these phenomena. Our endeavor involves a rigorous statistical inquiry, seeking to uncover any underlying relationships and causations that may exist between these distant yet intertwined occurrences.

The impetus for this investigation stems from an inherent curiosity to understand the broader implications of environmental crimes and their potential impacts on global ecosystems. While the connection may seem like attempting to light a fire in a downpour, our exploratory analysis has shown promising indications of a potential correlation, prompting us to venture deeper into this intriguing nexus.

Drawing upon the comprehensive data repositories available from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the esteemed environmental database of Mongabay, we embarked on a data-driven odyssey spanning nearly four decades, from 1987 to 2022. The underlying motivation for examining this extended time horizon is rooted in the recognition that ecological processes often unfold over extended periods, and any discernible effects may manifest gradually over time.

The implications of our research extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of crime and environmental conservation. If our findings substantiate a tangible link between arson in Nevada and the state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, it would underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly isolated events and locations, illuminating the broader dynamics of environmental degradation and the transnational ripple effects of such activities.

While the proverbial smoke from our initial analysis hints at a potential conflagration of insights, it is imperative to approach our findings with cautious skepticism, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation. However, as the adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and we are poised to delve deeper into unraveling the sparks and embers of this unexpected connection.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will present our methodological approach, the empirical findings, and the implications of our research. With this fiery investigation, we aim to cast light on the often-unseen interdependencies between seemingly disparate phenomena and shed new illuminative perspectives on the intricate web of global environmental dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The scintillating dance of fire has captivated human curiosity since time immemorial. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has unfortunately been a persistent menace, causing significant economic and social disruptions. On the other hand, the magnificent green expanse of the Amazonian rainforest has been a subject of fascination and concern for environmentalists and policymakers alike, given its significant ecological and climatic influence.
The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate elements – arson in the deserts of Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon – has sparked our interest in examining potential connections between these phenomena. Our endeavor involves a rigorous statistical inquiry, seeking to uncover any underlying relationships and causations that may exist between these distant yet intertwined occurrences.
The impetus for this investigation stems from an inherent curiosity to understand the broader implications of environmental crimes and their potential impacts on global ecosystems. While the connection may seem like attempting to light a fire in a downpour, our exploratory analysis has shown promising indications of a potential correlation, prompting us to venture deeper into this intriguing nexus.
Drawing upon the comprehensive data repositories available from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the esteemed environmental database of Mongabay, we embarked on a data-driven odyssey spanning nearly four decades, from 1987 to 2022. The underlying motivation for examining this extended time horizon is rooted in the recognition that ecological processes often unfold over extended periods, and any discernible effects may manifest gradually over time.
The implications of our research extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of crime and environmental conservation. If our findings substantiate a tangible link between arson in Nevada and the state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, it would underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly isolated events and locations, illuminating the broader dynamics of environmental degradation and the transnational ripple effects of such activities.
While the proverbial smoke from our initial analysis hints at a potential conflagration of insights, it is imperative to approach our findings with cautious skepticism, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation. However, as the adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and we are poised to delve deeper into unraveling the sparks and embers of this unexpected connection.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will present our methodological approach, the empirical findings, and the implications of our research. With this fiery investigation, we aim to cast light on the often-unseen interdependencies between seemingly disparate phenomena and shed new illuminative perspectives on the intricate web of global environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the connection between arson in Nevada and remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon is as varied as the ecosystem it seeks to understand. Smith et al. (2015) laid the groundwork for examining environmental crimes and their impact on global ecosystems, emphasizing the need to consider the far-reaching implications of seemingly isolated events. Doe (2017) expanded on this work, delving into the socio-economic ramifications of arson and its potential link to deforestation in remote regions. Jones (2020) took a more statistical approach, examining correlations between arson rates and forest cover across different geographical regions, setting the stage for our current investigation.

As our research kindled, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Big Burn: Teddy Roosevelt and the Fire that Saved America" by Timothy Egan and "The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate – Discoveries from a Secret World" by Peter Wohlleben, which provided unique perspectives on the relationship between fire and forest ecosystems. These literary sparks ignited our conceptual framework and fueled our desire to unearth the hidden connections between seemingly disparate occurrences.

In our quest for a deeper understanding, we also found ourselves drawn to literary works with titles such as "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes" by Caitlin Doughty and "Where There's Smoke" by Jodi Picoult. While not directly related to our topic, these titles certainly struck a chord with our inferno of curiosity, serving as literary kindling for our fiery pursuit of knowledge.

Furthering our unconventional approach to literature engagement, we turned to fictional works such as "Playing with Fire" by Tess Gerritsen and "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson. While these novels may not offer scientific insights, their fiery themes and dramatic narratives added a touch of playful irony to our otherwise rigorous exploration.

In a whimsical turn of events, our research also led us to draw inspiration from animated classics such as "FernGully: The Last Rainforest" and children's shows like "Avatar: The Last Airbender," wherein the intricate balance between fire and the natural world was depicted in a visually captivating manner. These unexpected forays into children's entertainment may seem frivolous, but they provided a refreshing perspective on the elemental dynamics of the natural world, reminding us that research, too, can benefit from a sprinkle of whimsy and wonder.

As we move forward in presenting our empirical findings and methodological approach, we hope to ignite the same sense of curiosity and playful intrigue that has fueled our investigative journey thus far. The heat is on, and we are stoking the flames of knowledge to illuminate the intricate web of interdependencies between seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Mongabay . You used data from 1987 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The scintillating dance of fire has captivated human curiosity since time immemorial. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has unfortunately been a persistent menace, causing significant economic and social disruptions. On the other hand, the magnificent green expanse of the Amazonian rainforest has been a subject of fascination and concern for environmentalists and policymakers alike, given its significant ecological and climatic influence.
The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate elements – arson in the deserts of Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon – has sparked our interest in examining potential connections between these phenomena. Our endeavor involves a rigorous statistical inquiry, seeking to uncover any underlying relationships and causations that may exist between these distant yet intertwined occurrences.
The impetus for this investigation stems from an inherent curiosity to understand the broader implications of environmental crimes and their potential impacts on global ecosystems. While the connection may seem like attempting to light a fire in a downpour, our exploratory analysis has shown promising indications of a potential correlation, prompting us to venture deeper into this intriguing nexus.
Drawing upon the comprehensive data repositories available from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the esteemed environmental database of Mongabay, we embarked on a data-driven odyssey spanning nearly four decades, from 1987 to 2022. The underlying motivation for examining this extended time horizon is rooted in the recognition that ecological processes often unfold over extended periods, and any discernible effects may manifest gradually over time.
The implications of our research extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of crime and environmental conservation. If our findings substantiate a tangible link between arson in Nevada and the state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, it would underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly isolated events and locations, illuminating the broader dynamics of environmental degradation and the transnational ripple effects of such activities.
While the proverbial smoke from our initial analysis hints at a potential conflagration of insights, it is imperative to approach our findings with cautious skepticism, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation. However, as the adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and we are poised to delve deeper into unraveling the sparks and embers of this unexpected connection.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will present our methodological approach, the empirical findings, and the implications of our research. With this fiery investigation, we aim to cast light on the often-unseen interdependencies between seemingly disparate phenomena and shed new illuminative perspectives on the intricate web of global environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the fiery web of seemingly unrelated events, our methodology embarks upon a scorching journey that involves a careful fusion of statistical analysis and environmental data exploration. The process of uncovering the potential relationship between arson in Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon requires an inferno of methodological rigor. Our data, collected from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the venerable environmental database of Mongabay, were then set ablaze with statistical manipulation and analysis.

The first step in our methodology involved the extraction and collation of arson data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, utilizing their comprehensive records from 1987 to 2022. The data were meticulously scrutinized to ensure accuracy and completeness, as we sought to capture the full spectrum of arson incidents within Nevada. This process involved sifting through the proverbial ashes of crime reports and synthesizing the scorching details into a coherent dataset for further analysis.

Simultaneously, our incendiary quest led us to Mongabay's environmental database, where we ferociously sought to gather information on the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon over the same timeframe. Delving into the lush data foliage, we meticulously harvested the forest cover statistics, aiming to capture the verdant essence of this iconic ecosystem to juxtapose it with the fiery events unfolding in the arid landscapes of Nevada.

With our datasets in hand, we then employed a scorching array of statistical analyses to examine the potential relationship between arson in Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. We applied a searing correlation analysis to unveil any underlying connections, allowing us to gauge the intensity of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our statistical inferno spared no measure of intensity, as we sought to capture the heat of any potential association, lest we leave any smoldering embers of doubt unattended.

The magnitude of our statistical conflagration was further amplified by the deployment of a multivariate regression analysis, which allowed us to control for the influence of potential confounding factors and delve deeper into the nuanced interplay between arson in Nevada and the state of the Amazonian forest cover. This approach kindled an inferno of insights, enabling us to discern the potential impact of arson on the preservation and degradation of this vital ecological resource.

In addition to these incendiary statistical methodologies, we incorporated spatial analysis techniques to geographically map and visualize the spatial interplay between the incidence of arson in Nevada and the geographical distribution of the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. The heat maps generated from this analysis provided a scorching visual representation of the potential spatial relationships, igniting new perspectives on the geographic dynamics of this unexpected connection.

Finally, our volatile analysis steered towards the calculation of a scorching correlation coefficient, accompanied by scintillating p-values, to substantiate any statistically significant relationships between arson in Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. These statistical metrics erupted with significance, illuminating the heat of the linkages that lay concealed within the charred remnants of our data.

In the ensuing sections, we will present the incandescent findings of our statistical exploration, shedding light on the potential correlations and implications of this fiery juxtaposition. Our approach aims to set ablaze a new understanding of the interconnectedness between environmental crimes and ecological conservation, offering a scorching vantage point to ponder the far-reaching impact of seemingly disparate events.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Mongabay .

For the time period 1987 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9487056, r-squared of 0.9000423, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The scintillating dance of fire has captivated human curiosity since time immemorial. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has unfortunately been a persistent menace, causing significant economic and social disruptions. On the other hand, the magnificent green expanse of the Amazonian rainforest has been a subject of fascination and concern for environmentalists and policymakers alike, given its significant ecological and climatic influence.
The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate elements – arson in the deserts of Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon – has sparked our interest in examining potential connections between these phenomena. Our endeavor involves a rigorous statistical inquiry, seeking to uncover any underlying relationships and causations that may exist between these distant yet intertwined occurrences.
The impetus for this investigation stems from an inherent curiosity to understand the broader implications of environmental crimes and their potential impacts on global ecosystems. While the connection may seem like attempting to light a fire in a downpour, our exploratory analysis has shown promising indications of a potential correlation, prompting us to venture deeper into this intriguing nexus.
Drawing upon the comprehensive data repositories available from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the esteemed environmental database of Mongabay, we embarked on a data-driven odyssey spanning nearly four decades, from 1987 to 2022. The underlying motivation for examining this extended time horizon is rooted in the recognition that ecological processes often unfold over extended periods, and any discernible effects may manifest gradually over time.
The implications of our research extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of crime and environmental conservation. If our findings substantiate a tangible link between arson in Nevada and the state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, it would underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly isolated events and locations, illuminating the broader dynamics of environmental degradation and the transnational ripple effects of such activities.
While the proverbial smoke from our initial analysis hints at a potential conflagration of insights, it is imperative to approach our findings with cautious skepticism, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation. However, as the adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and we are poised to delve deeper into unraveling the sparks and embers of this unexpected connection.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will present our methodological approach, the empirical findings, and the implications of our research. With this fiery investigation, we aim to cast light on the often-unseen interdependencies between seemingly disparate phenomena and shed new illuminative perspectives on the intricate web of global environmental dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The scorching quest to uncover any potential relationship between arson in Nevada and the extent of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon has yielded a remarkably incendiary correlation coefficient of 0.9487056. This conflagration of statistical evidence is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9000423 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong and significant relationship between these seemingly distant yet intertwined phenomena.

It's quite remarkable how these two seemingly unrelated events have set the stage for a fiery statistical pas de deux, demonstrating a compelling association that has sparked intense interest in the interplay of disparate ecological dynamics. The scalding correlation coefficient itself represents the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the frequency of arson in Nevada and the area of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon.

Notably, our findings suggest a direct and positive relationship between the two variables, illuminating the potential influence of arson incidents in Nevada on the preservation of forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This unexpected connection has set our research endeavor ablaze with curiosity, inciting a fervent desire to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this scorching association.

Our singular figure (Fig. 1) captures the essence of this red-hot relationship, showcasing the compelling scatterplot that visually elucidates the robust correlation between arson in Nevada and the extent of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This graphic representation serves as a fiery testimony to the sizzling statistical evidence that underscores the interplay between these apparently disparate yet interconnected ecological phenomena.

The findings of this investigation ignite a fervent call to arms, as it underscores the far-reaching implications of seemingly isolated events and transcends boundaries, illuminating the transnational ripple effects of environmental degradation. It appears that the sparks of environmental dynamism do not confine themselves within geopolitical borders, but rather, they transcend these boundaries, casting a wide net of ecologically significant consequences.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will explore the scorching implications of our findings, shedding further light on the unexpected correlation and its potential wider ramifications. This unexpected connection has enkindled our curiosity and provoked us to consider the heat transfer across borders, from the arid landscapes of Nevada to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest, igniting a fervent fire under the realm of environmental research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the connection between arson in Nevada and remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon is as varied as the ecosystem it seeks to understand. Smith et al. (2015) laid the groundwork for examining environmental crimes and their impact on global ecosystems, emphasizing the need to consider the far-reaching implications of seemingly isolated events. Doe (2017) expanded on this work, delving into the socio-economic ramifications of arson and its potential link to deforestation in remote regions. Jones (2020) took a more statistical approach, examining correlations between arson rates and forest cover across different geographical regions, setting the stage for our current investigation.
As our research kindled, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Big Burn: Teddy Roosevelt and the Fire that Saved America" by Timothy Egan and "The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate – Discoveries from a Secret World" by Peter Wohlleben, which provided unique perspectives on the relationship between fire and forest ecosystems. These literary sparks ignited our conceptual framework and fueled our desire to unearth the hidden connections between seemingly disparate occurrences.
In our quest for a deeper understanding, we also found ourselves drawn to literary works with titles such as "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes" by Caitlin Doughty and "Where There's Smoke" by Jodi Picoult. While not directly related to our topic, these titles certainly struck a chord with our inferno of curiosity, serving as literary kindling for our fiery pursuit of knowledge.
Furthering our unconventional approach to literature engagement, we turned to fictional works such as "Playing with Fire" by Tess Gerritsen and "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson. While these novels may not offer scientific insights, their fiery themes and dramatic narratives added a touch of playful irony to our otherwise rigorous exploration.
In a whimsical turn of events, our research also led us to draw inspiration from animated classics such as "FernGully: The Last Rainforest" and children's shows like "Avatar: The Last Airbender," wherein the intricate balance between fire and the natural world was depicted in a visually captivating manner. These unexpected forays into children's entertainment may seem frivolous, but they provided a refreshing perspective on the elemental dynamics of the natural world, reminding us that research, too, can benefit from a sprinkle of whimsy and wonder.
As we move forward in presenting our empirical findings and methodological approach, we hope to ignite the same sense of curiosity and playful intrigue that has fueled our investigative journey thus far. The heat is on, and we are stoking the flames of knowledge to illuminate the intricate web of interdependencies between seemingly unrelated phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching quest to uncover any potential relationship between arson in Nevada and the extent of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon has yielded a remarkably incendiary correlation coefficient of 0.9487056. This conflagration of statistical evidence is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9000423 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong and significant relationship between these seemingly distant yet intertwined phenomena.
It's quite remarkable how these two seemingly unrelated events have set the stage for a fiery statistical pas de deux, demonstrating a compelling association that has sparked intense interest in the interplay of disparate ecological dynamics. The scalding correlation coefficient itself represents the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the frequency of arson in Nevada and the area of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon.
Notably, our findings suggest a direct and positive relationship between the two variables, illuminating the potential influence of arson incidents in Nevada on the preservation of forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This unexpected connection has set our research endeavor ablaze with curiosity, inciting a fervent desire to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this scorching association.
Our singular figure (Fig. 1) captures the essence of this red-hot relationship, showcasing the compelling scatterplot that visually elucidates the robust correlation between arson in Nevada and the extent of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This graphic representation serves as a fiery testimony to the sizzling statistical evidence that underscores the interplay between these apparently disparate yet interconnected ecological phenomena.
The findings of this investigation ignite a fervent call to arms, as it underscores the far-reaching implications of seemingly isolated events and transcends boundaries, illuminating the transnational ripple effects of environmental degradation. It appears that the sparks of environmental dynamism do not confine themselves within geopolitical borders, but rather, they transcend these boundaries, casting a wide net of ecologically significant consequences.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will explore the scorching implications of our findings, shedding further light on the unexpected correlation and its potential wider ramifications. This unexpected connection has enkindled our curiosity and provoked us to consider the heat transfer across borders, from the arid landscapes of Nevada to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest, igniting a fervent fire under the realm of environmental research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The fiery link between arson in Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, as illuminated by our scalding correlation coefficient and sizzling p-value, has set our research ablaze with curiosity. Our findings not only fan the flames of previous research but also add fuel to the fire of understanding the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events.

Building on the kindling laid by Smith et al. (2015) and the blazing path forged by Doe (2017), our results scorch the scene with statistical evidence, solidifying the notion that the sparks of environmental dynamism do not confine themselves within geopolitical borders. The heat is truly on, with our findings adding a new flame to the realm of environmental research, transcending geographic distances and igniting a fervent call to arms.

While our research may seem like a mere flicker in the grand wildfire of scientific exploration, the robust correlation between arson and forest cover provides a scorching reminder of the interplay between seemingly isolated events. It seems that we have fired up a new avenue of inquiry, shedding light on the incendiary transnational ripple effects of environmental degradation.

The visual testament of our red-hot relationship, as captured in our singular figure (Fig. 1), serves as a smoldering reminder of the potential influence of seemingly distant yet intertwined phenomena. This graphic representation not only kindles the imagination but also stokes the flames of curiosity, as it visually elucidates the scorching statistical evidence that underscores the interplay between these apparently disparate yet interconnected ecological phenomena.

In the realm of unconventional literature engagement, our thematic inspiration from works such as "Playing with Fire" by Tess Gerritsen and "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson may seem like a playful interlude, but their fiery themes and dramatic narratives added a touch of poetic irony to our otherwise rigorous exploration. Indeed, it's as if we've found ourselves dancing on the edge of reason, playing with the fires of curiosity, and seeking to uncover the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated occurrences.

Our findings raise the temperature of environmental research, encouraging a rekindling of curiosity and a pursuit of knowledge that transcends the boundaries of conventional inquiry. It's as though we've dipped our toes in the fire of discovery, harnessing the flames of statistics to illuminate the intricate web of interdependencies between seemingly disparate phenomena. Indeed, the heat is on, and we are stoking the flames of knowledge to shed blazing light on this unexpected connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Nevada and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.

Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The scintillating dance of fire has captivated human curiosity since time immemorial. Arson, the deliberate act of setting fire to property, has unfortunately been a persistent menace, causing significant economic and social disruptions. On the other hand, the magnificent green expanse of the Amazonian rainforest has been a subject of fascination and concern for environmentalists and policymakers alike, given its significant ecological and climatic influence.
The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate elements – arson in the deserts of Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon – has sparked our interest in examining potential connections between these phenomena. Our endeavor involves a rigorous statistical inquiry, seeking to uncover any underlying relationships and causations that may exist between these distant yet intertwined occurrences.
The impetus for this investigation stems from an inherent curiosity to understand the broader implications of environmental crimes and their potential impacts on global ecosystems. While the connection may seem like attempting to light a fire in a downpour, our exploratory analysis has shown promising indications of a potential correlation, prompting us to venture deeper into this intriguing nexus.
Drawing upon the comprehensive data repositories available from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the esteemed environmental database of Mongabay, we embarked on a data-driven odyssey spanning nearly four decades, from 1987 to 2022. The underlying motivation for examining this extended time horizon is rooted in the recognition that ecological processes often unfold over extended periods, and any discernible effects may manifest gradually over time.
The implications of our research extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of crime and environmental conservation. If our findings substantiate a tangible link between arson in Nevada and the state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, it would underscore the interconnectedness of seemingly isolated events and locations, illuminating the broader dynamics of environmental degradation and the transnational ripple effects of such activities.
While the proverbial smoke from our initial analysis hints at a potential conflagration of insights, it is imperative to approach our findings with cautious skepticism, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation. However, as the adage goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and we are poised to delve deeper into unraveling the sparks and embers of this unexpected connection.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will present our methodological approach, the empirical findings, and the implications of our research. With this fiery investigation, we aim to cast light on the often-unseen interdependencies between seemingly disparate phenomena and shed new illuminative perspectives on the intricate web of global environmental dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching quest to uncover any potential relationship between arson in Nevada and the extent of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon has yielded a remarkably incendiary correlation coefficient of 0.9487056. This conflagration of statistical evidence is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9000423 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong and significant relationship between these seemingly distant yet intertwined phenomena.
It's quite remarkable how these two seemingly unrelated events have set the stage for a fiery statistical pas de deux, demonstrating a compelling association that has sparked intense interest in the interplay of disparate ecological dynamics. The scalding correlation coefficient itself represents the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the frequency of arson in Nevada and the area of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon.
Notably, our findings suggest a direct and positive relationship between the two variables, illuminating the potential influence of arson incidents in Nevada on the preservation of forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This unexpected connection has set our research endeavor ablaze with curiosity, inciting a fervent desire to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this scorching association.
Our singular figure (Fig. 1) captures the essence of this red-hot relationship, showcasing the compelling scatterplot that visually elucidates the robust correlation between arson in Nevada and the extent of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This graphic representation serves as a fiery testimony to the sizzling statistical evidence that underscores the interplay between these apparently disparate yet interconnected ecological phenomena.
The findings of this investigation ignite a fervent call to arms, as it underscores the far-reaching implications of seemingly isolated events and transcends boundaries, illuminating the transnational ripple effects of environmental degradation. It appears that the sparks of environmental dynamism do not confine themselves within geopolitical borders, but rather, they transcend these boundaries, casting a wide net of ecologically significant consequences.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will explore the scorching implications of our findings, shedding further light on the unexpected correlation and its potential wider ramifications. This unexpected connection has enkindled our curiosity and provoked us to consider the heat transfer across borders, from the arid landscapes of Nevada to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest, igniting a fervent fire under the realm of environmental research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scorching investigation into the interplay between arson in Nevada and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon has unveiled a remarkable correlation of 0.9487056, setting our research ablaze with fervent curiosity and illuminating the unexpected nexus between these seemingly distant phenomena. The robust statistical evidence, represented by the sizzling r-squared value of 0.9000423 and the scalding p-value less than 0.01, has kindled a fervent desire to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this fiery association. Our findings suggest a direct and positive relationship, shedding light on the potential impact of arson incidents in Nevada on the preservation of forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, sparking intense interest in the interplay of disparate ecological dynamics. It appears that the sparks of environmental dynamism do not confine themselves within geopolitical borders but transcend them, casting a wide net of ecologically significant consequences. However, as we wrap up this fiery expedition, it seems that no more research is needed in this area. After all, where there's smoke, there's fire, and we've certainly fanned the flames of knowledge in this scorching pursuit.

And we don't want to get burned out on this topic, do we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pyroecology and Ecological Pyrotechnics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ecological Pyrotechnics Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Playing with Fire: Investigating the Blaze Trade Between Nevada Arson and Amazonian Greenery with an abstract of In this paper, we seem to have stumbled upon the sizzling connection between the blazing crimes of arson in Nevada and the smoldering state of remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the environmental database of Mongabay, we have engaged in a scorching exploration of this fiery pairing, delving into the years spanning from 1987 to 2022.
Our findings have ignited quite the excitement, with a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9487056 and a p-value less than 0.01. So, it seems that the heat is on between these seemingly distant locales. This unexpected connection has set our research ablaze with curiosity and has us pondering the far-reaching impact of seemingly unrelated events. Perhaps it's time to consider the heat transfer across borders - from the desert sands of Nevada to the lush canopies of the Amazon rainforest - and bring a new flame to the forefront of environmental research.

ChatGPT:

Nevada arson, Amazon forest, connection, correlation coefficient, criminal justice data, environmental database, FBI, Mongabay, heat transfer, forest cover, Nevada desert, Amazon rainforest, border impact, arson investigation, environmental research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Nevada
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Nevada
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Nevada

Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon
Detailed data title: Estimated Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon
Source: Mongabay
See what else correlates with Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

Correlation r = 0.9487056 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9000423 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Nevada) over the 36 years from 1987 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-18. 0.0000000000000000014171804970
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 1.4E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 705,626,419,582,317,952 random variables You don't actually need 705 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 35 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 35 because we have two variables measured over a period of 36 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Arson in Nevada (Arson rate)41.650.560.348.147.146.146.745.748.344.640.138.234.529.125.629.325.729.531.83325.72620.516.916.917.1151515.912.412.412.59.414.213.213.3
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon (Sq. KM)374457037235203705750369202036809903667200365231036374103608350359019035769603559580354232035241003505930348428034588803431110341210033978103386160337325033657903358790335237033478003341910333690033306903322800331585033083103298550329012032796503268050




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([41.6,50.5,60.3,48.1,47.1,46.1,46.7,45.7,48.3,44.6,40.1,38.2,34.5,29.1,25.6,29.3,25.7,29.5,31.8,33,25.7,26,20.5,16.9,16.9,17.1,15,15,15.9,12.4,12.4,12.5,9.4,14.2,13.2,13.3,])
array_2 = np.array([3744570,3723520,3705750,3692020,3680990,3667200,3652310,3637410,3608350,3590190,3576960,3559580,3542320,3524100,3505930,3484280,3458880,3431110,3412100,3397810,3386160,3373250,3365790,3358790,3352370,3347800,3341910,3336900,3330690,3322800,3315850,3308310,3298550,3290120,3279650,3268050,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Nevada"
array_2_name = "Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1610 · Black Variable ID: 20055 · Red Variable ID: 372
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0