Download png, svg
AI explanation
As people drank more bottled water, they stayed more hydrated and ended up booking more hotel rooms, leading to higher revenue for Marriott International. Perhaps the secret to a successful hotel chain is simply H2O-pening more water bottles!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a character standing in a vast, picturesque landscape resembling the iconic setting of Skyrim. The character is depicted carrying a bottle of water in one hand, and with the other hand, they are engaged in checking the Marriott International's stock price on their smartphone. The clear blue sky overhead reinforces the idea of widespread bottled water consumption in the US and the global significance of Marriott International's stock. The serene environment around the character enhances the visual's impact, emphasizing the contrast between nature and technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism Realistic Brutalism A scene from Skyrim Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a person is carrying a bottle of water in one hand and checking the Marriott International's stock price on their smartphone with the other hand. The bottle of water symbolizes US Bottled Water Consumption per Person, while the smartphone represents Marriott International's stock price. They are standing under a clear blue sky, suggesting the widespread availability and consumption of bottled water in the US and the global reach of Marriott International's stock.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a person is carrying a bottle of water in one hand and checking the Marriott International's stock price on their smartphone with the other hand. The bottle of water symbolizes US Bottled Water Consumption per Person, while the smartphone represents Marriott International's stock price. They are standing under a clear blue sky, suggesting the widespread availability and consumption of bottled water in the US and the global reach of Marriott International's stock. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a character standing in a vast, picturesque landscape resembling the iconic setting of Skyrim. The character is depicted carrying a bottle of water in one hand, and with the other hand, they are engaged in checking the Marriott International's stock price on their smartphone. The clear blue sky overhead reinforces the idea of widespread bottled water consumption in the US and the global significance of Marriott International's stock. The serene environment around the character enhances the visual's impact, emphasizing the contrast between nature and technology.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Marriott International's stock price (MAR) to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation Journal of Aquatic Finance Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and financial markets has long been a source of fascination for researchers and analysts alike. The idea that seemingly disparate aspects of the economy could be intertwined often conjures skepticism, like the idea of a fish riding a bicycle. Yet, time and again, we have been surprised by the curious connections that emerge when we dive beneath the surface. In this study, we undertake a systematic investigation of the relationship between bottled water consumption in the United States and the stock price of Marriott International (MAR). Our goal is to pour over the data and distill any potential correlations that may exist, shedding light on this intriguing aspect of economic interplay.
The concept of bottled water consumption may seem trivial at first glance, like a drop in the ocean of economic factors influencing stock prices. However, as we know, even the smallest droplet can create ripples that extend far beyond its immediate vicinity. Similarly, the reach of consumer behavior, even in the seemingly mundane act of choosing bottled water over other beverages, can have far-reaching implications that touch various sectors of the economy. It's like the butterfly effect, but with water bottles and stock tickers instead.
As for Marriott International, the company's sprawling presence in the hospitality industry makes its stock price a revealing barometer of economic dynamics. Studying the potential relationship between this global hospitality giant and the hydration habits of Americans may seem as unusual as a penguin in the desert, but it offers a fascinating lens through which to examine the coalescence of consumer choices and financial performance.
The aim of this paper is to quench the thirst for understanding the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated variables. By conducting a rigorous analysis of the available data, we endeavor to add a drop of clarity to the ocean of economic inquiry, and perhaps unearth some unexpected findings along the way. We invite readers to join us as we navigate the currents of bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, illuminating the depths of this fluid relationship.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and financial markets has long been a source of fascination for researchers and analysts alike. The idea that seemingly disparate aspects of the economy could be intertwined often conjures skepticism, like the idea of a fish riding a bicycle. Yet, time and again, we have been surprised by the curious connections that emerge when we dive beneath the surface. In this study, we undertake a systematic investigation of the relationship between bottled water consumption in the United States and the stock price of Marriott International (MAR). Our goal is to pour over the data and distill any potential correlations that may exist, shedding light on this intriguing aspect of economic interplay.
The concept of bottled water consumption may seem trivial at first glance, like a drop in the ocean of economic factors influencing stock prices. However, as we know, even the smallest droplet can create ripples that extend far beyond its immediate vicinity. Similarly, the reach of consumer behavior, even in the seemingly mundane act of choosing bottled water over other beverages, can have far-reaching implications that touch various sectors of the economy. It's like the butterfly effect, but with water bottles and stock tickers instead.
As for Marriott International, the company's sprawling presence in the hospitality industry makes its stock price a revealing barometer of economic dynamics. Studying the potential relationship between this global hospitality giant and the hydration habits of Americans may seem as unusual as a penguin in the desert, but it offers a fascinating lens through which to examine the coalescence of consumer choices and financial performance.
The aim of this paper is to quench the thirst for understanding the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated variables. By conducting a rigorous analysis of the available data, we endeavor to add a drop of clarity to the ocean of economic inquiry, and perhaps unearth some unexpected findings along the way. We invite readers to join us as we navigate the currents of bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, illuminating the depths of this fluid relationship.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the relationship between consumer behavior and stock prices is replete with studies that probe the intricacies of seemingly disparate variables. Smith et al. (2017) examine the impact of coffee consumption on the stock market, while Doe and Jones (2019) explore the correlation between avocado toast sales and real estate prices. These investigations underscore the far-reaching implications of consumer habits on financial markets, showcasing the pertinence of seemingly mundane choices in shaping economic dynamics.
Moving beyond the confines of traditional economic analyses, the intersection of beverage consumption and stock prices has garnered attention in recent years. Lorem and Ipsum (2020) posit a direct association between soda consumption and the stock performance of major fast-food chains, further illustrating the noteworthy influence of consumable goods on financial markets. Building on this foundation, our study ventures into uncharted territory by delving into the relationship between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR).
In the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "The Economics of Thirst" by Aquanomics (2015) and "Market Hydration: Beverage Consumption and Financial Fluctuations" by Financi-Water Consultants (2018) have shed light on the underexplored confluence of beverage trends and economic indicators. These seminal texts offer valuable perspectives on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains, setting the stage for our exploration of bottled water consumption and its correlation with a hospitality juggernaut's stock performance.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, captivating narratives such as "The Water Wealth Wager" by Aqua A. Read (2013) and "The Stock-Ticker Swig" by Market Mary (2019) provide entertaining allegories that, while not grounded in empirical evidence, offer whimsical reflections on the potential interplay between consumer hydration habits and financial markets. With a touch of humor and imagination, these literary works serve to reframe the discourse surrounding our investigation, infusing our analysis with a lighthearted perspective as we navigate the depths of this aquatic inquiry.
It is worth noting that our research also draws upon unconventional sources, including children's cartoons and animated shows that, while seemingly unrelated to finance and beverage consumption, offer subtle insights that enliven our investigation. Shows such as "SpongeBob SquarePants," with its emphasis on the importance of staying hydrated in the underwater world of Bikini Bottom, and "Adventure Time," where characters embark on whimsical quests for refreshing beverages, provide quirky inspirations that infuse our exploration with a playful spirit.
In summary, the literature on the confluence of consumer behavior and stock prices, combined with imaginative narratives and unconventional sources, forms a comprehensive backdrop against which we embark on our fluid investigation of bottled water consumption and its intriguing correlation with Marriott International's stock price.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and financial markets has long been a source of fascination for researchers and analysts alike. The idea that seemingly disparate aspects of the economy could be intertwined often conjures skepticism, like the idea of a fish riding a bicycle. Yet, time and again, we have been surprised by the curious connections that emerge when we dive beneath the surface. In this study, we undertake a systematic investigation of the relationship between bottled water consumption in the United States and the stock price of Marriott International (MAR). Our goal is to pour over the data and distill any potential correlations that may exist, shedding light on this intriguing aspect of economic interplay.
The concept of bottled water consumption may seem trivial at first glance, like a drop in the ocean of economic factors influencing stock prices. However, as we know, even the smallest droplet can create ripples that extend far beyond its immediate vicinity. Similarly, the reach of consumer behavior, even in the seemingly mundane act of choosing bottled water over other beverages, can have far-reaching implications that touch various sectors of the economy. It's like the butterfly effect, but with water bottles and stock tickers instead.
As for Marriott International, the company's sprawling presence in the hospitality industry makes its stock price a revealing barometer of economic dynamics. Studying the potential relationship between this global hospitality giant and the hydration habits of Americans may seem as unusual as a penguin in the desert, but it offers a fascinating lens through which to examine the coalescence of consumer choices and financial performance.
The aim of this paper is to quench the thirst for understanding the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated variables. By conducting a rigorous analysis of the available data, we endeavor to add a drop of clarity to the ocean of economic inquiry, and perhaps unearth some unexpected findings along the way. We invite readers to join us as we navigate the currents of bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, illuminating the depths of this fluid relationship.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To conduct this investigation, we propagated through an ocean of data, casting our metaphorical nets wide in search of the elusive link between bottled water consumption and Marriott International's (MAR) stock price. Firstly, we made a splash by collating historical per capita bottled water consumption statistics from the reputable well of knowledge known as Statista. Drawing on data from 2002 to 2022, we created a comprehensive timeline of the ebb and flow of the American thirst for bottled hydration.
In parallel, we dove deep into the ocean of financial data, utilizing the offerings of LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to net the stock price dynamics of Marriott International over the same period. We then meticulously synchronized the temporal dimensions of these datasets, aligning the waves of beverage consumption with the tides of stock market performance in a precise and synchronized manner.
With these foundational datasets in hand, we employed a nifty statistical analysis to discern any undertows of correlation between the two variables. Leveraging correlation analysis akin to the clinking of ice in a fine glass of water, we measured the strength and direction of the relationship between US bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price. Our statistical arsenal included the calculation of Pearson's correlation coefficient, allowing us to quantify the degree of association with numerical precision.
Further, we surfed the waves of time-series analysis, using econometric techniques to tease out potential patterns and trends hidden within the undulating data points. Our rigorous approach allowed us to navigate the choppy waters of statistical inference, determining the robustness and significance of any observed correlations.
In addition, we conducted supplementary analyses to account for potential confounding factors, recognizing that the sea of economic interactions can be muddied by lurking variables. Through regression modeling and sensitivity analyses, we sought to filter out the noise and isolate the essence of the relationship between bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price.
Lastly, we subjected our findings to the scrutiny of various tests, ensuring that our conclusions stood firm against the barrage of statistical storms. By establishing the statistical significance of our results and diligently considering alternative explanations, we aimed to provide a reliable beacon of insight amidst the tempestuous seas of empirical inquiry.
In sum, our approach combined statistical rigour with methodological transparency, anchoring our investigation in a solid framework while fluidly navigating the complexities of our research question. Through these convoluted yet purposeful methods, we aimed to distill the essence of the connection between US bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, uncovering the fluid dynamics of this unexpected relationship.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9278586, r-squared of 0.8609217, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and financial markets has long been a source of fascination for researchers and analysts alike. The idea that seemingly disparate aspects of the economy could be intertwined often conjures skepticism, like the idea of a fish riding a bicycle. Yet, time and again, we have been surprised by the curious connections that emerge when we dive beneath the surface. In this study, we undertake a systematic investigation of the relationship between bottled water consumption in the United States and the stock price of Marriott International (MAR). Our goal is to pour over the data and distill any potential correlations that may exist, shedding light on this intriguing aspect of economic interplay.
The concept of bottled water consumption may seem trivial at first glance, like a drop in the ocean of economic factors influencing stock prices. However, as we know, even the smallest droplet can create ripples that extend far beyond its immediate vicinity. Similarly, the reach of consumer behavior, even in the seemingly mundane act of choosing bottled water over other beverages, can have far-reaching implications that touch various sectors of the economy. It's like the butterfly effect, but with water bottles and stock tickers instead.
As for Marriott International, the company's sprawling presence in the hospitality industry makes its stock price a revealing barometer of economic dynamics. Studying the potential relationship between this global hospitality giant and the hydration habits of Americans may seem as unusual as a penguin in the desert, but it offers a fascinating lens through which to examine the coalescence of consumer choices and financial performance.
The aim of this paper is to quench the thirst for understanding the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated variables. By conducting a rigorous analysis of the available data, we endeavor to add a drop of clarity to the ocean of economic inquiry, and perhaps unearth some unexpected findings along the way. We invite readers to join us as we navigate the currents of bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, illuminating the depths of this fluid relationship.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) revealed a striking correlation between per capita bottled water consumption in the United States and Marriott International's stock price (MAR) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient calculated was 0.9278586, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.8609217 further underscores the substantial portion of Marriott International's stock price variability that can be explained by the fluctuations in bottled water consumption. This finding might just make one ponder, could it be that investors are not only paying attention to revenue projections and market trends, but also to whether Americans are reaching for a bottle of refreshment?
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the observed correlation is not simply the result of random chance. Instead, it provides compelling evidence that the relationship between these variables is more than just a mere statistical mirage. It appears that the fluctuations in bottled water consumption hold some sway over the movements of Marriott International's stock price, adding a new dimension to the concept of "thirst" for profits in the financial markets. It's almost as if Wall Street could benefit from its own water cooler gossip about bottled water consumption trends.
In Fig. 1 (not included), the scatterplot graphically illustrates this robust correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and the stock price of Marriott International. The data points fall in a clear, upward-sloping pattern, emphasizing the synchronization in the movements of these variables over the years. It's like watching synchronized swimmers gracefully moving in tandem, except in this case, it's the buoyancy of stock prices mirroring the fluidity of bottled water consumption.
In summary, our research has brought to the surface an unexpected connection between hydration preferences and financial performance. This investigation into the aquatic world of bottled water consumption and the financial seas of Marriott International's stock price serves as a reminder that even in the vast ocean of economic factors, there may be currents of influence flowing between the most unexpected of sectors. It's as though we've stumbled upon an underwater treasure chest in the sea of economics, revealing this hidden link between hydration and stock market fluctuations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the relationship between consumer behavior and stock prices is replete with studies that probe the intricacies of seemingly disparate variables. Smith et al. (2017) examine the impact of coffee consumption on the stock market, while Doe and Jones (2019) explore the correlation between avocado toast sales and real estate prices. These investigations underscore the far-reaching implications of consumer habits on financial markets, showcasing the pertinence of seemingly mundane choices in shaping economic dynamics.
Moving beyond the confines of traditional economic analyses, the intersection of beverage consumption and stock prices has garnered attention in recent years. Lorem and Ipsum (2020) posit a direct association between soda consumption and the stock performance of major fast-food chains, further illustrating the noteworthy influence of consumable goods on financial markets. Building on this foundation, our study ventures into uncharted territory by delving into the relationship between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR).
In the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "The Economics of Thirst" by Aquanomics (2015) and "Market Hydration: Beverage Consumption and Financial Fluctuations" by Financi-Water Consultants (2018) have shed light on the underexplored confluence of beverage trends and economic indicators. These seminal texts offer valuable perspectives on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains, setting the stage for our exploration of bottled water consumption and its correlation with a hospitality juggernaut's stock performance.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, captivating narratives such as "The Water Wealth Wager" by Aqua A. Read (2013) and "The Stock-Ticker Swig" by Market Mary (2019) provide entertaining allegories that, while not grounded in empirical evidence, offer whimsical reflections on the potential interplay between consumer hydration habits and financial markets. With a touch of humor and imagination, these literary works serve to reframe the discourse surrounding our investigation, infusing our analysis with a lighthearted perspective as we navigate the depths of this aquatic inquiry.
It is worth noting that our research also draws upon unconventional sources, including children's cartoons and animated shows that, while seemingly unrelated to finance and beverage consumption, offer subtle insights that enliven our investigation. Shows such as "SpongeBob SquarePants," with its emphasis on the importance of staying hydrated in the underwater world of Bikini Bottom, and "Adventure Time," where characters embark on whimsical quests for refreshing beverages, provide quirky inspirations that infuse our exploration with a playful spirit.
In summary, the literature on the confluence of consumer behavior and stock prices, combined with imaginative narratives and unconventional sources, forms a comprehensive backdrop against which we embark on our fluid investigation of bottled water consumption and its intriguing correlation with Marriott International's stock price.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) revealed a striking correlation between per capita bottled water consumption in the United States and Marriott International's stock price (MAR) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient calculated was 0.9278586, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.8609217 further underscores the substantial portion of Marriott International's stock price variability that can be explained by the fluctuations in bottled water consumption. This finding might just make one ponder, could it be that investors are not only paying attention to revenue projections and market trends, but also to whether Americans are reaching for a bottle of refreshment?
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the observed correlation is not simply the result of random chance. Instead, it provides compelling evidence that the relationship between these variables is more than just a mere statistical mirage. It appears that the fluctuations in bottled water consumption hold some sway over the movements of Marriott International's stock price, adding a new dimension to the concept of "thirst" for profits in the financial markets. It's almost as if Wall Street could benefit from its own water cooler gossip about bottled water consumption trends.
In Fig. 1 (not included), the scatterplot graphically illustrates this robust correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and the stock price of Marriott International. The data points fall in a clear, upward-sloping pattern, emphasizing the synchronization in the movements of these variables over the years. It's like watching synchronized swimmers gracefully moving in tandem, except in this case, it's the buoyancy of stock prices mirroring the fluidity of bottled water consumption.
In summary, our research has brought to the surface an unexpected connection between hydration preferences and financial performance. This investigation into the aquatic world of bottled water consumption and the financial seas of Marriott International's stock price serves as a reminder that even in the vast ocean of economic factors, there may be currents of influence flowing between the most unexpected of sectors. It's as though we've stumbled upon an underwater treasure chest in the sea of economics, revealing this hidden link between hydration and stock market fluctuations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
The results of our investigation into the relationship between US bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR) bring to light a striking correlation that has significant implications for our understanding of consumer behavior and financial markets. Our findings align with previous research that has delved into the curious connections between consumer habits and stock prices, including the impact of coffee consumption on the stock market and the correlation between avocado toast sales and real estate prices. While these relationships may initially seem far-fetched, they ultimately underscore the profound influence of consumer preferences on economic dynamics.
In line with these prior studies, our analysis supports the notion that seemingly mundane choices, such as the decision to reach for a bottle of water, can indeed exert a tangible impact on the financial performance of companies in the hospitality sector. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value uncovered in our research point to a direct association between bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, providing compelling evidence that this linkage is more than just a curious happenstance. It appears that the ebb and flow of Americans' hydration habits intertwine with the fluctuations in Marriott International's stock price in a manner that commands attention from market observers. This finding underscores the need for investors to consider not only traditional financial metrics but also the quenching patterns of consumers when assessing the performance of hospitality companies.
Our results also align with the insights offered by Aquanomics and Financi-Water Consultants, as well as the whimsical reflections presented in "The Water Wealth Wager" and "The Stock-Ticker Swig." While these sources may seem unconventional, they inject a sense of playfulness into our investigation and provide an avenue for contemplating the interplay between consumer hydration habits and financial market dynamics. It's almost as if we've embarked on an aquatic adventure through the depths of economic correlations, discovering hidden treasures of insight along the way.
The scatterplot vividly depicts the synchronization in the movements of bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, evoking images of synchronized swimmers gracefully moving in tandem. This visual representation serves as a compelling illustration of the fluid relationship between these variables, capturing the essence of their interconnectedness. It's as though we've stumbled upon a hidden underwater treasure chest in the sea of economics, unveiling this unexpected link between hydration and stock market fluctuations.
Our research offers a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries, illustrating the potential influence of beverage consumption on financial markets. While our findings may initially appear to be swimming against the current of conventional economic analyses, they ultimately reveal a compelling connection that merits further exploration. In a world where conventional wisdom can sometimes be as clear as mud, our investigation has shed light on a surprising ripple effect that extends from the realm of bottled water consumption to the financial seas of hospitality stocks.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and financial markets has long been a source of fascination for researchers and analysts alike. The idea that seemingly disparate aspects of the economy could be intertwined often conjures skepticism, like the idea of a fish riding a bicycle. Yet, time and again, we have been surprised by the curious connections that emerge when we dive beneath the surface. In this study, we undertake a systematic investigation of the relationship between bottled water consumption in the United States and the stock price of Marriott International (MAR). Our goal is to pour over the data and distill any potential correlations that may exist, shedding light on this intriguing aspect of economic interplay.
The concept of bottled water consumption may seem trivial at first glance, like a drop in the ocean of economic factors influencing stock prices. However, as we know, even the smallest droplet can create ripples that extend far beyond its immediate vicinity. Similarly, the reach of consumer behavior, even in the seemingly mundane act of choosing bottled water over other beverages, can have far-reaching implications that touch various sectors of the economy. It's like the butterfly effect, but with water bottles and stock tickers instead.
As for Marriott International, the company's sprawling presence in the hospitality industry makes its stock price a revealing barometer of economic dynamics. Studying the potential relationship between this global hospitality giant and the hydration habits of Americans may seem as unusual as a penguin in the desert, but it offers a fascinating lens through which to examine the coalescence of consumer choices and financial performance.
The aim of this paper is to quench the thirst for understanding the intricate connections between these seemingly unrelated variables. By conducting a rigorous analysis of the available data, we endeavor to add a drop of clarity to the ocean of economic inquiry, and perhaps unearth some unexpected findings along the way. We invite readers to join us as we navigate the currents of bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price, illuminating the depths of this fluid relationship.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) revealed a striking correlation between per capita bottled water consumption in the United States and Marriott International's stock price (MAR) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient calculated was 0.9278586, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.8609217 further underscores the substantial portion of Marriott International's stock price variability that can be explained by the fluctuations in bottled water consumption. This finding might just make one ponder, could it be that investors are not only paying attention to revenue projections and market trends, but also to whether Americans are reaching for a bottle of refreshment?
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the observed correlation is not simply the result of random chance. Instead, it provides compelling evidence that the relationship between these variables is more than just a mere statistical mirage. It appears that the fluctuations in bottled water consumption hold some sway over the movements of Marriott International's stock price, adding a new dimension to the concept of "thirst" for profits in the financial markets. It's almost as if Wall Street could benefit from its own water cooler gossip about bottled water consumption trends.
In Fig. 1 (not included), the scatterplot graphically illustrates this robust correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and the stock price of Marriott International. The data points fall in a clear, upward-sloping pattern, emphasizing the synchronization in the movements of these variables over the years. It's like watching synchronized swimmers gracefully moving in tandem, except in this case, it's the buoyancy of stock prices mirroring the fluidity of bottled water consumption.
In summary, our research has brought to the surface an unexpected connection between hydration preferences and financial performance. This investigation into the aquatic world of bottled water consumption and the financial seas of Marriott International's stock price serves as a reminder that even in the vast ocean of economic factors, there may be currents of influence flowing between the most unexpected of sectors. It's as though we've stumbled upon an underwater treasure chest in the sea of economics, revealing this hidden link between hydration and stock market fluctuations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
The results of our study have quenched our intellectual thirst for uncovering the surprising relationship between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). The robust correlation coefficient, akin to a refreshing splash of statistical significance, underscores the strength of this unanticipated linkage. These findings add a new dimension to the notion of market dynamics, providing evidence that even the waves of beverage preferences can ripple through the stock market seas.
As we reflect on the implications of our research, it's hard to resist a chuckle at the thought of investors keeping an eye on the ebb and flow of bottled water consumption while analyzing their stock portfolios. It seems the old adage of "water, water, everywhere" applies not only to the seas, but also to the intricate web of financial influences.
In conclusion, our investigation highlights the need to recognize the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated economic variables, reminding us that beneath the surface of statistical analysis, there may be undercurrents of correlation waiting to be discovered. We trust that our findings will make a splash in the academic and financial communities, encouraging further exploration of the whimsical ways in which consumer choices can impact market movements.
Zesting with pride in this research, we assert that further investigations into this buoyant relationship would be akin to carrying coals to Newcastle. Thus, we conclude that no further research is warranted in this area, as we have brought this unexpected correlation to the surface, ready to be sipped and savored by scholars and investors alike.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Aquatic Finance
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Hydroeconomic Analysis and Lodging Investments
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between US per capita bottled water consumption and Marriott International's stock price (MAR). Leveraging data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9278586 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01 for the time period between 2002 and 2022. Our research provides compelling evidence of a surprising linkage between the hydration habits of Americans and the financial performance of a hospitality giant. We discuss potential implications and offer a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated industries. Join us in this quenching journey through the realms of finance and beverage consumption.
ChatGPT:
- bottled water consumption and stock price correlation
- bottled water consumption and hospitality stock performance
- US per capita bottled water consumption trend
- Marriott International stock price analysis
- correlation between beverage consumption and stock performance
- US bottled water consumption statistics
- financial impact of beverage consumption
- hospitality industry and consumer habits
- interconnectedness of industries in finance and beverage consumption
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
US Bottled Water Consumption per PersonSource: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Marriott International's stock price (MAR)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Marriott International (MAR) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with Marriott International's stock price (MAR)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8609217 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Marriott International's stock price (MAR)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-9. 0.0000000014029746828225453000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.4E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 712,771,237 random variables You don't actually need 712 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.83, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons) | 20.1 | 21.6 | 23.2 | 25.4 | 27.6 | 29 | 28.5 | 27.6 | 28.3 | 29.2 | 30.8 | 32 | 34.1 | 36.5 | 39 | 42 | 42.3 | 44 | 45.2 | 47 | 46.5 |
Marriott International's stock price (MAR) (Stock price) | 18.94 | 15.43 | 21.48 | 29.25 | 31.29 | 44.47 | 31.79 | 18.2 | 26.02 | 39.49 | 29.88 | 38.32 | 49.03 | 78.34 | 65.93 | 83.35 | 135.89 | 106.72 | 151.5 | 131.51 | 165.07 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.1,21.6,23.2,25.4,27.6,29,28.5,27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,46.5,])
array_2 = np.array([18.94,15.43,21.48,29.25,31.29,44.47,31.79,18.2,26.02,39.49,29.88,38.32,49.03,78.34,65.93,83.35,135.89,106.72,151.5,131.51,165.07,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Marriott International's stock price (MAR)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
- Line chart for only Marriott International's stock price (MAR)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Wading into the Relationship between Bottled Water Consumption and Marriott International Stock Price: A Fluid Investigation
Your dedication to rating warms my heart!
Correlation ID: 2106 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 1699