AI explanation
As the saying goes, "desperate times call for brilliant inventions!" The spike in robberies in North Dakota led to an unexpected surge in innovation, as residents sought new ways to protect their belongings and outsmart the thieves. This ultimately resulted in an increase in patents granted in the US, as North Dakotans' sticky situations bred a new wave of creative problem-solving. Remember, necessity may be the mother of invention, but a good old-fashioned heist is the wacky uncle!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] Visual Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint Midwestern town in North Dakota, with a charming community hall as the focal point. Surrounding the hall are a diverse group of lively residents huddled around a table, passionately brainstorming ideas and sketching out inventive security systems. In the midst of the conversation, a local inventor enthusiastically presents a new locking mechanism for doors, while another resident demonstrates a clever alarm system. Elsewhere in the town, a few individuals are seen drafting blueprints and diagrams, eagerly filing patent applications with the US Patent Office. The scene should exude a sense of determination and creativity as the community bands together to combat the recent spike in robberies, ultimately resulting in a surge of patents granted in the US. The overall style should be whimsical and heartwarming, capturing the spirit of innovation and camaraderie within the town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Oragami Charcoal Cute cartoon Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US, in the following situation: As the saying goes, "desperate times call for brilliant inventions!" The spike in robberies in North Dakota led to an unexpected surge in innovation, as residents sought new ways to protect their belongings and outsmart the thieves. This ultimately resulted in an increase in patents granted in the US, as North Dakotans' sticky situations bred a new wave of creative problem-solving. Remember, necessity may be the mother of invention, but a good old-fashioned heist is the wacky uncle!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in North Dakota, a group of residents gather in a community hall, discussing recent robberies that have taken place. They huddle around a table, brainstorming ideas and sketching out innovative security systems to protect their homes and businesses. A local inventor excitedly presents a new locking mechanism for doors, while another resident demonstrates a clever alarm system. Meanwhile, in another part of town, a few individuals are seen drafting blueprints and diagrams, as they eagerly file patent applications with the US Patent Office. The air is filled with a spirit of determination and creativity, as the spike in robberies fuels a surge of inventive solutions, ultimately resulting in a rise in patents granted in the US.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in North Dakota, a group of residents gather in a community hall, discussing recent robberies that have taken place. They huddle around a table, brainstorming ideas and sketching out innovative security systems to protect their homes and businesses. A local inventor excitedly presents a new locking mechanism for doors, while another resident demonstrates a clever alarm system. Meanwhile, in another part of town, a few individuals are seen drafting blueprints and diagrams, as they eagerly file patent applications with the US Patent Office. The air is filled with a spirit of determination and creativity, as the spike in robberies fuels a surge of inventive solutions, ultimately resulting in a rise in patents granted in the US. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] Visual Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint Midwestern town in North Dakota, with a charming community hall as the focal point. Surrounding the hall are a diverse group of lively residents huddled around a table, passionately brainstorming ideas and sketching out inventive security systems. In the midst of the conversation, a local inventor enthusiastically presents a new locking mechanism for doors, while another resident demonstrates a clever alarm system. Elsewhere in the town, a few individuals are seen drafting blueprints and diagrams, eagerly filing patent applications with the US Patent Office. The scene should exude a sense of determination and creativity as the community bands together to combat the recent spike in robberies, ultimately resulting in a surge of patents granted in the US. The overall style should be whimsical and heartwarming, capturing the spirit of innovation and camaraderie within the town.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Robberies in North Dakota caused Patents granted in the US to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents Journal of Criminological Patent Research Jan 2024 |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and USPTO to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle once said, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." And we, as meticulous researchers, agree – especially when the data itself leads to a puzzling conundrum that tickles our intellectual fancy. In all seriousness, dear reader, picture us standing at the crossroads of North Dakota’s robberies and the United States’ patent landscape, scratching our heads and throwing our hands up in bemused surrender, before diving headfirst into this enigmatic correlation.
It is not often that one finds themselves in the curious position of pondering, "What do cat burglars in North Dakota have in common with the inventors of Silicon Valley?" But upon peering into the intricate web of data, one might find these seemingly unrelated strands weaving a surprising tale of connection. It’s almost as if North Dakota's robbers have been quietly whispering invention secrets to the winds, carrying them across the plains and into the minds of innovative individuals nationwide. It's like Robin Hood, but instead of stealing from the rich to give to the poor, it's stealing to incite an invention fiesta!
This study stakes its claim in the fascinating intersection of crime and creativity, probing the depths of coincidence and causality to uncover a link that might just be the missing piece in this statistical puzzle. As we don our metaphorical deerstalkers and start connecting the dots, we invite you to join us on this journey into the unexpected, as we unveil the surprising tale of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle once said, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." And we, as meticulous researchers, agree – especially when the data itself leads to a puzzling conundrum that tickles our intellectual fancy. In all seriousness, dear reader, picture us standing at the crossroads of North Dakota’s robberies and the United States’ patent landscape, scratching our heads and throwing our hands up in bemused surrender, before diving headfirst into this enigmatic correlation.
It is not often that one finds themselves in the curious position of pondering, "What do cat burglars in North Dakota have in common with the inventors of Silicon Valley?" But upon peering into the intricate web of data, one might find these seemingly unrelated strands weaving a surprising tale of connection. It’s almost as if North Dakota's robbers have been quietly whispering invention secrets to the winds, carrying them across the plains and into the minds of innovative individuals nationwide. It's like Robin Hood, but instead of stealing from the rich to give to the poor, it's stealing to incite an invention fiesta!
This study stakes its claim in the fascinating intersection of crime and creativity, probing the depths of coincidence and causality to uncover a link that might just be the missing piece in this statistical puzzle. As we don our metaphorical deerstalkers and start connecting the dots, we invite you to join us on this journey into the unexpected, as we unveil the surprising tale of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their exploration of the complex relationship between crime and innovation, Smith and Doe (2015) posit that societal dynamics may play a key role in shaping patterns of invention and criminal behavior. Despite the seemingly divergent nature of these two realms, the authors uncover a thought-provoking intertwining of forces, prompting readers to consider the unexpected ways in which human endeavors intersect. It’s like a cerebral game of cat and mouse, with innovation and crime engaged in a perpetual dance of intrigue.
Now, turning to a more lighthearted take on correlations, Jones (2017) delves into the humorous side of statistical analysis, quipping that finding a connection between robberies in North Dakota and US patents would be as improbable as finding a polar bear in a snowstorm – and yet, our research proves otherwise! Talk about a plot twist worthy of a Sherlock Holmes mystery – elementary, my dear reader.
Steering into the realm of non-fiction works, "The Economic Impact of Crime" by Brown (2019) offers insights into the economic repercussions of criminal activities, while "From Idea to Invention" by Green (2018) outlines the patent process and the innovative spirit. The real kicker, though, is when we bring in "How to Catch a Thief" by Black (2016) – who would have thought that catching a thief could lead to uncovering the secrets of groundbreaking inventions? It's like solving a whodunit, only to stumble upon the blueprint for the next big invention!
It’s all fun and games until we take a dive into the fictional section of our research. "The Art of Robbery" by Silver (2014) and "The Patent Conspiracy" by Gold (2017) may be works of fiction, but what if they hold within them hidden truths about the curious connection we've uncovered? After all, stranger things have happened – just ask the protagonists of "Robbers R Us" by Platinum (2016) and "Patent Pirates" by Diamond (2018). Who knows, maybe these fictional tales hold the key to unraveling the perplexing relationship we're investigating.
And now, for the grand finale of our literary excursion, we present to you the most groundbreaking findings of them all: "The Shampoo Chronicles" by Rainbow (2020). As we meticulously studied the backs of various shampoo bottles during our extensive literature review process, we stumbled upon hidden messages that unraveled the true conspiracy behind North Dakota robberies and US patents. Okay, maybe that last part is a bit of a stretch, but who’s to say where the real truth lies?
In the grand tapestry of research, we often find that reality is stranger than fiction, and our investigation into the connection between robberies in North Dakota and US patents certainly solidifies this adage. Who would have thought that the wild, wild west of North Dakota could play such a pivotal role in the nation's innovation landscape? And yet, here we are, with data in hand and a sense of wonder in our hearts, ready to unveil the unexpected twists and turns of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and USPTO . You used data from 1985 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle once said, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." And we, as meticulous researchers, agree – especially when the data itself leads to a puzzling conundrum that tickles our intellectual fancy. In all seriousness, dear reader, picture us standing at the crossroads of North Dakota’s robberies and the United States’ patent landscape, scratching our heads and throwing our hands up in bemused surrender, before diving headfirst into this enigmatic correlation.
It is not often that one finds themselves in the curious position of pondering, "What do cat burglars in North Dakota have in common with the inventors of Silicon Valley?" But upon peering into the intricate web of data, one might find these seemingly unrelated strands weaving a surprising tale of connection. It’s almost as if North Dakota's robbers have been quietly whispering invention secrets to the winds, carrying them across the plains and into the minds of innovative individuals nationwide. It's like Robin Hood, but instead of stealing from the rich to give to the poor, it's stealing to incite an invention fiesta!
This study stakes its claim in the fascinating intersection of crime and creativity, probing the depths of coincidence and causality to uncover a link that might just be the missing piece in this statistical puzzle. As we don our metaphorical deerstalkers and start connecting the dots, we invite you to join us on this journey into the unexpected, as we unveil the surprising tale of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
We embarked on our research with the tenacity of a sleuthing Sherlock and the curiosity of a cat burglar eyeing a diamond necklace. Our first order of business was to gather data on the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States from 1985 to 2020, recognizing that these unlikely bedfellows might just be more than a statistical fluke. We scoured the depths of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), employing our secret arsenal of web scraping techniques and data extraction spells to extract the desired information. It's safe to say we had our "patent"-ed attention to detail during this phase!
To establish a dependable foundation for our analysis, we meticulously cleaned and harmonized the obtained data, gingerly removing any outliers and suspicious characters that might have been lurking in the shadows. After all, we couldn’t let any rogue data points disrupt our investigation – we were on a quest for truth, not a wild goose chase! Once our data were pristinely polished, we set about calculating the correlation coefficient and the significance level, employing complex statistical algorithms that would have made even the most seasoned mathematician blink twice.
Fueled by countless cups of coffee and an unwavering resolve to decipher this enigmatic link, we then conducted a series of regression analyses to delve into the nuances of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. We used a concoction of linear, polynomial, and maybe even a pinch of magical regression models to turn this puzzle into child's play. And through the magic of our statistical wizardry, we unearthed an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9189160, sending ripples of marvel through the research team. It was a eureka moment that not even the wiliest of cat burglars could snatch away from us!
However, it wasn’t all smooth sailing. We encountered our fair share of challenges, akin to dodging an intricate security system while attempting a daring heist of prized data. We wrangled with the complexities of spatiotemporal analysis, traversed the treacherous terrain of data standardization, and deciphered the cryptic hieroglyphics of multivariate regression models. But through the collective expertise of our team and a healthy dose of resilience, we proudly emerged victorious, armed with findings that would shake the very foundations of statistical theory.
In essence, dear reader, our methodology was a delicate dance of data wrangling, statistical acrobatics, and unwavering tenacity, sprinkled with a touch of whimsy and an undying thirst for discovery. As we present our findings, we invite you to join us in celebrating the sheer audacity of this research endeavor, where the unexpected convergence of robberies in North Dakota and patents in the United States unfolds like a captivating mystery novel, filled with twists, turns, and maybe even a cleverly executed pun or two.
Next, we delve into the beguiling tapestry of our findings, where the unexpected linkage between crime and creativity takes center stage, inviting us to reevaluate our understanding of causality and serendipity in the complex web of human endeavors.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and USPTO .
For the time period 1985 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9189160, r-squared of 0.8444066, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle once said, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." And we, as meticulous researchers, agree – especially when the data itself leads to a puzzling conundrum that tickles our intellectual fancy. In all seriousness, dear reader, picture us standing at the crossroads of North Dakota’s robberies and the United States’ patent landscape, scratching our heads and throwing our hands up in bemused surrender, before diving headfirst into this enigmatic correlation.
It is not often that one finds themselves in the curious position of pondering, "What do cat burglars in North Dakota have in common with the inventors of Silicon Valley?" But upon peering into the intricate web of data, one might find these seemingly unrelated strands weaving a surprising tale of connection. It’s almost as if North Dakota's robbers have been quietly whispering invention secrets to the winds, carrying them across the plains and into the minds of innovative individuals nationwide. It's like Robin Hood, but instead of stealing from the rich to give to the poor, it's stealing to incite an invention fiesta!
This study stakes its claim in the fascinating intersection of crime and creativity, probing the depths of coincidence and causality to uncover a link that might just be the missing piece in this statistical puzzle. As we don our metaphorical deerstalkers and start connecting the dots, we invite you to join us on this journey into the unexpected, as we unveil the surprising tale of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and an r-squared value of 0.8444066, the association between these two variables is undeniably robust. This statistical evidence firmly establishes a compelling relationship that demands further exploration.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between robberies in North Dakota and patents granted in the US. The plot vividly conveys the striking relationship between these apparently unrelated phenomena, leaving little room for doubt that something intriguing is afoot.
It's almost as if the robbers in North Dakota were saying, "We may steal some goods, but we also steal some ideas!" This unexpected connection challenges traditional assumptions about the drivers of innovation and criminal behavior, opening up a world of possibilities for interdisciplinary inquiry and creative problem-solving.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidifies the credibility of our findings, emphatically underscoring the strength of the association uncovered. The implications of this discovery are as vast as the North Dakota plains, prompting us to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms that link crime rates in a sparsely populated state to the surge of inventive activity across the entire nation.
In light of these findings, one cannot help but muse, "Who knew that the seed of innovation could be sown amidst the windswept prairies of North Dakota?" This unexpected revelation challenges conventional wisdom and invigorates the exploration of the interplay between societal phenomena and creative endeavors.
Stay tuned for the next installment of our research, where we aim to unearth the hidden threads linking the Dakotan heist to the nation’s intellectual wealth, all while keeping an eye out for any suspicious characters skulking about the patent office!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their exploration of the complex relationship between crime and innovation, Smith and Doe (2015) posit that societal dynamics may play a key role in shaping patterns of invention and criminal behavior. Despite the seemingly divergent nature of these two realms, the authors uncover a thought-provoking intertwining of forces, prompting readers to consider the unexpected ways in which human endeavors intersect. It’s like a cerebral game of cat and mouse, with innovation and crime engaged in a perpetual dance of intrigue.
Now, turning to a more lighthearted take on correlations, Jones (2017) delves into the humorous side of statistical analysis, quipping that finding a connection between robberies in North Dakota and US patents would be as improbable as finding a polar bear in a snowstorm – and yet, our research proves otherwise! Talk about a plot twist worthy of a Sherlock Holmes mystery – elementary, my dear reader.
Steering into the realm of non-fiction works, "The Economic Impact of Crime" by Brown (2019) offers insights into the economic repercussions of criminal activities, while "From Idea to Invention" by Green (2018) outlines the patent process and the innovative spirit. The real kicker, though, is when we bring in "How to Catch a Thief" by Black (2016) – who would have thought that catching a thief could lead to uncovering the secrets of groundbreaking inventions? It's like solving a whodunit, only to stumble upon the blueprint for the next big invention!
It’s all fun and games until we take a dive into the fictional section of our research. "The Art of Robbery" by Silver (2014) and "The Patent Conspiracy" by Gold (2017) may be works of fiction, but what if they hold within them hidden truths about the curious connection we've uncovered? After all, stranger things have happened – just ask the protagonists of "Robbers R Us" by Platinum (2016) and "Patent Pirates" by Diamond (2018). Who knows, maybe these fictional tales hold the key to unraveling the perplexing relationship we're investigating.
And now, for the grand finale of our literary excursion, we present to you the most groundbreaking findings of them all: "The Shampoo Chronicles" by Rainbow (2020). As we meticulously studied the backs of various shampoo bottles during our extensive literature review process, we stumbled upon hidden messages that unraveled the true conspiracy behind North Dakota robberies and US patents. Okay, maybe that last part is a bit of a stretch, but who’s to say where the real truth lies?
In the grand tapestry of research, we often find that reality is stranger than fiction, and our investigation into the connection between robberies in North Dakota and US patents certainly solidifies this adage. Who would have thought that the wild, wild west of North Dakota could play such a pivotal role in the nation's innovation landscape? And yet, here we are, with data in hand and a sense of wonder in our hearts, ready to unveil the unexpected twists and turns of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and an r-squared value of 0.8444066, the association between these two variables is undeniably robust. This statistical evidence firmly establishes a compelling relationship that demands further exploration.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between robberies in North Dakota and patents granted in the US. The plot vividly conveys the striking relationship between these apparently unrelated phenomena, leaving little room for doubt that something intriguing is afoot.
It's almost as if the robbers in North Dakota were saying, "We may steal some goods, but we also steal some ideas!" This unexpected connection challenges traditional assumptions about the drivers of innovation and criminal behavior, opening up a world of possibilities for interdisciplinary inquiry and creative problem-solving.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidifies the credibility of our findings, emphatically underscoring the strength of the association uncovered. The implications of this discovery are as vast as the North Dakota plains, prompting us to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms that link crime rates in a sparsely populated state to the surge of inventive activity across the entire nation.
In light of these findings, one cannot help but muse, "Who knew that the seed of innovation could be sown amidst the windswept prairies of North Dakota?" This unexpected revelation challenges conventional wisdom and invigorates the exploration of the interplay between societal phenomena and creative endeavors.
Stay tuned for the next installment of our research, where we aim to unearth the hidden threads linking the Dakotan heist to the nation’s intellectual wealth, all while keeping an eye out for any suspicious characters skulking about the patent office!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
In the grand symphony of academia, our research serves as a harmonious note in the ongoing saga of uncovering the connections that shape our world. Our study not only reaffirms the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States but also extends the web of knowledge, weaving together seemingly disparate strands of human activity in a revelatory manner. It's like discovering that the wheels of progress are greased with the dust of the Wild West!
Our findings align with the scholarly work of Smith and Doe (2015), who pointed to the intertwining forces shaping patterns of invention and criminal behavior. The dance between innovation and crime continues to captivate our attention, much like a choreographed ballet of intellectual and illicit pursuits. It's as if the robbers are saying, "We've definitely stolen something, but we've also sparked some creative ideas in the process!"
Furthermore, our results echo the humorous skepticism portrayed by Jones (2017), who likened finding a correlation between North Dakota robberies and US patents to finding a polar bear in a snowstorm. Yet, the improbable has become reality, and our research exemplifies the unexpected plot twists that keep the academic narrative rich and engaging. As we delve deeper into this unforeseen connection, we invite further exploration and contemplation of the curious forces at play.
The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value obtained in our study firmly establish the veracity of the relationship between robberies in North Dakota and patents granted in the US, defying conventional assumptions and prompting amazement akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure in the prairies. Perhaps North Dakota has truly become a hotbed of both inventive spirit and, well, some rather inventive heists. This revelation challenges preconceptions about the origins of innovation and criminal activity, enticing researchers to probe deeper into the enigmatic undercurrents that fuel these phenomena.
As we peer into the kaleidoscope of societal dynamics, our research energizes the pursuit of knowledge, offering a gleaming nugget of insight amidst the untamed expanse of data. Who knew that the windswept plains of North Dakota held the keys to understanding the nation's intellectual wealth? This unexpected revelation not only sparks thought-provoking discussions but also incites curiosity about the potential applications of our findings in interdisciplinary investigation and real-world problem-solving.
Our quirky exploration of the uncharted frontier of academic inquiry beckons scholars and enthusiasts alike to join us in unraveling the mystical ties that bind North Dakota's daring exploits to the nation's innovative tapestry. After all, in the words of the academic jesters, "Who knew that chasing down a few outlaws could lead to unlocking the secrets of America's ingenuity?" It's an adventure filled with unexpected twists and wry chuckles, as we remain vigilant for any suspicious characters lurking in the fog of academic intrigue!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in North Dakota and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle once said, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." And we, as meticulous researchers, agree – especially when the data itself leads to a puzzling conundrum that tickles our intellectual fancy. In all seriousness, dear reader, picture us standing at the crossroads of North Dakota’s robberies and the United States’ patent landscape, scratching our heads and throwing our hands up in bemused surrender, before diving headfirst into this enigmatic correlation.
It is not often that one finds themselves in the curious position of pondering, "What do cat burglars in North Dakota have in common with the inventors of Silicon Valley?" But upon peering into the intricate web of data, one might find these seemingly unrelated strands weaving a surprising tale of connection. It’s almost as if North Dakota's robbers have been quietly whispering invention secrets to the winds, carrying them across the plains and into the minds of innovative individuals nationwide. It's like Robin Hood, but instead of stealing from the rich to give to the poor, it's stealing to incite an invention fiesta!
This study stakes its claim in the fascinating intersection of crime and creativity, probing the depths of coincidence and causality to uncover a link that might just be the missing piece in this statistical puzzle. As we don our metaphorical deerstalkers and start connecting the dots, we invite you to join us on this journey into the unexpected, as we unveil the surprising tale of The Great Dakota Patent Heist!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and an r-squared value of 0.8444066, the association between these two variables is undeniably robust. This statistical evidence firmly establishes a compelling relationship that demands further exploration.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between robberies in North Dakota and patents granted in the US. The plot vividly conveys the striking relationship between these apparently unrelated phenomena, leaving little room for doubt that something intriguing is afoot.
It's almost as if the robbers in North Dakota were saying, "We may steal some goods, but we also steal some ideas!" This unexpected connection challenges traditional assumptions about the drivers of innovation and criminal behavior, opening up a world of possibilities for interdisciplinary inquiry and creative problem-solving.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidifies the credibility of our findings, emphatically underscoring the strength of the association uncovered. The implications of this discovery are as vast as the North Dakota plains, prompting us to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms that link crime rates in a sparsely populated state to the surge of inventive activity across the entire nation.
In light of these findings, one cannot help but muse, "Who knew that the seed of innovation could be sown amidst the windswept prairies of North Dakota?" This unexpected revelation challenges conventional wisdom and invigorates the exploration of the interplay between societal phenomena and creative endeavors.
Stay tuned for the next installment of our research, where we aim to unearth the hidden threads linking the Dakotan heist to the nation’s intellectual wealth, all while keeping an eye out for any suspicious characters skulking about the patent office!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research unravels the captivating tale of how robberies in North Dakota seem to be linked to the number of patents granted in the United States. It's like the state is saying, "We may have fewer people, but our ideas are grander than our vast open spaces!" These unexpected findings not only challenge traditional assumptions but also beckon further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play.
As we close this chapter, we can't help but quip, "Who knew that the winds of North Dakota carried more than just whispers of mischief, but also the seeds of innovation?" It's almost as if the state has been silently nudging the inventive minds across the nation to think outside the box while keeping their valuables under lock and key.
The robust correlation coefficient and high significance level firmly establish the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena, leaving us to ponder the complex interplay between crime and creativity. It's like a classic whodunit, where the suspects turn out to be the unlikeliest characters!
After all is said and done, it is evident that no more research is needed in this area. The unexpected relationship uncovered has truly stolen the show, leaving us with a conclusion as firm as a bank vault door – it seems that when it comes to robberies in North Dakota and patents in the US, there's more to it than meets the eye.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Criminological Patent Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Society for the Advancement of Prairie Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents with an abstract of This groundbreaking research delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of robberies in North Dakota and the number of patents granted in the United States. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our study aimed to shed light on this puzzling association. Remarkably, we discovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9189160 and a significance level of p < 0.01, firmly establishing the link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Our analysis spans the period from 1985 to 2020, encompassing a wealth of historical data that has never been comprehensively studied in this context. Through rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data processing, we unearthed compelling patterns and interactions between robberies in the remote plains of North Dakota and the thriving innovation landscape across the nation. This research not only reveals the fascinating interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal trends but also underscores the richness of our data-driven world.
In light of these findings, one might be tempted to say, "It seems like North Dakota really knows how to steal the show when it comes to patents!" Our study not only confirms this sentiment but also suggests that there may be hidden dynamics at play, waiting to be unveiled through further inquiry. This research sparks thought-provoking discussions and leaves us pondering the intricate tapestry of human behavior and its unexpected reverberations in the realm of innovation.
ChatGPT:
robberies, North Dakota, US patents, correlation coefficient, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, United States Patent and Trademark Office, historical data, statistical methods, data processing, societal trends, innovation landscape, interconnectedness, human behavior, hidden dynamics, inquiry
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Robberies in North DakotaDetailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in North Dakota
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in North Dakota
Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of utility patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8444066 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Patents granted in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Robberies in North Dakota) over the 36 years from 1985 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-15. 0.0000000000000027001193768579
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 2.7E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 370,353,995,668,032 random variables You don't actually need 370 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 35 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 35 because we have two variables measured over a period of 36 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.85, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | |
Robberies in North Dakota (Robbery rate) | 6.4 | 6.9 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 9.2 | 7.8 | 8 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 11.1 | 10 | 11 | 6.4 | 10.2 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 6.8 | 8.5 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 11.4 | 16.5 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 18.1 | 22.2 | 23.6 | 21 | 24 | 24.2 | 20.8 | 24.1 | 19.7 |
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted) | 71661 | 70860 | 82952 | 77924 | 95537 | 90365 | 96511 | 97444 | 98342 | 101676 | 101419 | 109645 | 111984 | 147517 | 153485 | 157494 | 166035 | 167331 | 169023 | 164290 | 143806 | 173772 | 157282 | 157772 | 167349 | 219614 | 224505 | 253155 | 277835 | 300677 | 298408 | 303049 | 318828 | 307759 | 354430 | 352049 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.4,6.9,7.6,8.1,9.2,7.8,8,7.9,8.3,11.1,10,11,6.4,10.2,8.8,8.7,9.4,9.1,8.4,6.8,8.5,11.8,11.7,11.4,16.5,13.3,13.3,18.1,22.2,23.6,21,24,24.2,20.8,24.1,19.7,])
array_2 = np.array([71661,70860,82952,77924,95537,90365,96511,97444,98342,101676,101419,109645,111984,147517,153485,157494,166035,167331,169023,164290,143806,173772,157282,157772,167349,219614,224505,253155,277835,300677,298408,303049,318828,307759,354430,352049,])
array_1_name = "Robberies in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Patents granted in the US"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Robberies in North Dakota
- Line chart for only Patents granted in the US
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Great Dakota Patent Heist: Uncovering the Connection Between Robberies in North Dakota and US Patents
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 4071 · Black Variable ID: 20209 · Red Variable ID: 847