about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,665 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Kingston, New York and the second variable is Kerosene used in Syria.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Kingston, New York decreased, it created a ripple effect that was positively 'air-resistible.' This led to a lowering of demand for kerosene, as there was less need for purification processes, so the kerosene used in Syria decreased. It's a case of pollution solutions leading to a bit of 'kero-clean' diplomacy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image generation prompt: Generate an image that depicts a vibrant, retro-futuristic cityscape with a clean, pastel color palette and bright neon lights. Show a transformed, cleaner city skyline of Kingston, New York, with clear, starry skies and a sense of uplifting positivity. In the foreground, include people leisurely enjoying the outdoors, perhaps skating or walking in a serene park setting. Emphasize the absence of face masks and a joyous, carefree atmosphere. Additionally, incorporate subtle visual cues representing the decrease in kerosene demand, such as a symbolic transition from pollutant-infused air to fresh, clear atmospheres. Suggest a harmonious link between Kingston and Syria, symbolizing the positive ripple effect of reduced pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art a funny image macro A photo-realistic image Cyber folk Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Vaporwave

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria, in the following situation: As air pollution in Kingston, New York decreased, it created a ripple effect that was positively 'air-resistible.' This led to a lowering of demand for kerosene, as there was less need for purification processes, so the kerosene used in Syria decreased. It's a case of pollution solutions leading to a bit of 'kero-clean' diplomacy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Kingston, New York, the air is noticeably cleaner following widespread efforts to reduce pollution. The city skyline is now clearer, and people can be seen enjoying the outdoors without masks. As a result, the demand for kerosene in Syria has decreased. The air-resistible transformation has created a positive ripple effect, leading to a decrease in the need for kerosene purification processes. This has resulted in cleaner air in Syria as well, as kerosene usage has decreased. Both locations are experiencing the benefits of pollution solutions, paving the way for a bit of 'kero-clean' diplomacy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Vaporwave ] and depicting this scene: In Kingston, New York, the air is noticeably cleaner following widespread efforts to reduce pollution. The city skyline is now clearer, and people can be seen enjoying the outdoors without masks. As a result, the demand for kerosene in Syria has decreased. The air-resistible transformation has created a positive ripple effect, leading to a decrease in the need for kerosene purification processes. This has resulted in cleaner air in Syria as well, as kerosene usage has decreased. Both locations are experiencing the benefits of pollution solutions, paving the way for a bit of 'kero-clean' diplomacy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image generation prompt: Generate an image that depicts a vibrant, retro-futuristic cityscape with a clean, pastel color palette and bright neon lights. Show a transformed, cleaner city skyline of Kingston, New York, with clear, starry skies and a sense of uplifting positivity. In the foreground, include people leisurely enjoying the outdoors, perhaps skating or walking in a serene park setting. Emphasize the absence of face masks and a joyous, carefree atmosphere. Additionally, incorporate subtle visual cues representing the decrease in kerosene demand, such as a symbolic transition from pollutant-infused air to fresh, clear atmospheres. Suggest a harmonious link between Kingston and Syria, symbolizing the positive ripple effect of reduced pollution.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Kingston, New York caused Kerosene used in Syria to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

The Journal of Ecological Entanglements

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the smog of curiosity hovers over the scientific community, we embark on a journey to unravel the mysterious link between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the use of kerosene in Syria. The connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables appears to be as enigmatic as a statistical anomaly at first glance, but as researchers, it is our duty to dive into the depths of data and emerge with compelling insights, even if it means wading through a sea of perplexing correlations and surprising associations.

One might be inclined to ask, "What has the charming, picturesque town of Kingston got to do with the ancient and historically rich land of Syria?" Well, as it turns out, more than one might expect! As we plunge into the vast pool of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this unconventional relationship and examine the intricate web of factors that bring Kingston and Syria together in the realm of environmental impact.

While some may think that studying air pollution and kerosene use is as thrilling as watching paint dry, we assure you that the pursuit of knowledge is anything but dull. Armed with our statistical tools and a healthy dose of scientific curiosity, our research team embarked on this journey with the enthusiasm of adventurers and the determination of intrepid explorers. We are ready to unearth the buried treasure of correlations, sift through the sands of data, and emerge with findings that will leave the world astounded and inspired.

As we delve into this eclectic mix of variables, we cannot help but appreciate the complexity of our natural and social systems. The interconnectedness of our world never ceases to amaze, much like a complex algebraic equation - just when you think you've solved for "x," another variable jumps into the mix, leaving you scratching your head and reaching for more advanced statistical models.

So, buckle up as we embark on a statistical rollercoaster through the realms of air quality and energy consumption. Together, we will navigate through the twists and turns of correlation, causation, and perhaps even a few statistical outliers that are as unexpected as an algebraic expression yielding an imaginary number. We invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating and data-driven adventure, where the journey promises to be as eye-opening as a microscope revealing hidden mysteries in a drop of water. Let's harness the power of data and embark on this quest to uncover the truth behind the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the smog of curiosity hovers over the scientific community, we embark on a journey to unravel the mysterious link between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the use of kerosene in Syria. The connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables appears to be as enigmatic as a statistical anomaly at first glance, but as researchers, it is our duty to dive into the depths of data and emerge with compelling insights, even if it means wading through a sea of perplexing correlations and surprising associations.
One might be inclined to ask, "What has the charming, picturesque town of Kingston got to do with the ancient and historically rich land of Syria?" Well, as it turns out, more than one might expect! As we plunge into the vast pool of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this unconventional relationship and examine the intricate web of factors that bring Kingston and Syria together in the realm of environmental impact.
While some may think that studying air pollution and kerosene use is as thrilling as watching paint dry, we assure you that the pursuit of knowledge is anything but dull. Armed with our statistical tools and a healthy dose of scientific curiosity, our research team embarked on this journey with the enthusiasm of adventurers and the determination of intrepid explorers. We are ready to unearth the buried treasure of correlations, sift through the sands of data, and emerge with findings that will leave the world astounded and inspired.
As we delve into this eclectic mix of variables, we cannot help but appreciate the complexity of our natural and social systems. The interconnectedness of our world never ceases to amaze, much like a complex algebraic equation - just when you think you've solved for "x," another variable jumps into the mix, leaving you scratching your head and reaching for more advanced statistical models.
So, buckle up as we embark on a statistical rollercoaster through the realms of air quality and energy consumption. Together, we will navigate through the twists and turns of correlation, causation, and perhaps even a few statistical outliers that are as unexpected as an algebraic expression yielding an imaginary number. We invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating and data-driven adventure, where the journey promises to be as eye-opening as a microscope revealing hidden mysteries in a drop of water. Let's harness the power of data and embark on this quest to uncover the truth behind the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing literature offers a wealth of information and perspectives on air pollution, energy consumption, and their interconnectedness. Smith (2015) provides a thorough analysis of the socio-economic implications of air pollution in urban environments, demonstrating the wide-ranging effects on health, economy, and quality of life. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricacies of kerosene usage in developing nations, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities associated with this energy source.

However, as we venture deeper into the labyrinth of academic inquiry, we encounter unexpected companions on this scholarly odyssey. "Clean Air and Kerosene: A Comparative Study" by Johnson et al. (2019) is a beacon of insight, illuminating the parallels between air quality in industrialized nations and energy choices in regions with limited access to modern fuels. This juxtaposition offers a fresh perspective on the transcontinental dance of airborne pollutants and the use of kerosene.

Further diversifying our intellectual arsenal, we turn to non-fiction literature that explores the intersection of environmental impact and human behavior. "The Air We Breathe" by Davis (2017) provides a poignant exploration of the global ramifications of air pollution, weaving together tales of resilience and environmental stewardship. In a similar vein, "Kerosene Chronicles" by Patel (2016) paints a vivid portrait of energy dynamics in developing societies, capturing the essence of necessity-driven resource utilization.

Yet, as scholars, we also draw inspiration from unexpected sources that stimulate the imagination and thought. In the realm of fiction, "Cloudy with a Chance of Kerosene" by Sparkle (2014) offers a whimsical narrative that sparks contemplation about the whims and fancies of atmospheric interactions. Conversely, "The Polluted Princess" by Stone (2015) captures the essence of environmental degradation and the quest for cleaner air, infusing a thought-provoking blend of fantasy and reality.

As we navigate the multifaceted landscape of knowledge, it is imperative not to overlook the insights gleaned from childhood tales and animated adventures. The animated series "Kerosene Quest" and the classic children's book "The Pollution Puzzler" serve as reminders of the timeless lessons embedded in storytelling. Through these unconventional lenses, we are reminded that the quest for understanding transcends the boundaries of age and genre, intertwining valuable lessons with the charm of artistic expression.

In the spirit of scholarly curiosity, let us embrace the diversity of intellectual influences and embark on this expedition of discovery with an open mind and a hint of whimsy. The journey ahead promises to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria, demonstrating that academic pursuit can be as enthralling as unearthing buried treasure in a sea of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1991 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the smog of curiosity hovers over the scientific community, we embark on a journey to unravel the mysterious link between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the use of kerosene in Syria. The connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables appears to be as enigmatic as a statistical anomaly at first glance, but as researchers, it is our duty to dive into the depths of data and emerge with compelling insights, even if it means wading through a sea of perplexing correlations and surprising associations.
One might be inclined to ask, "What has the charming, picturesque town of Kingston got to do with the ancient and historically rich land of Syria?" Well, as it turns out, more than one might expect! As we plunge into the vast pool of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this unconventional relationship and examine the intricate web of factors that bring Kingston and Syria together in the realm of environmental impact.
While some may think that studying air pollution and kerosene use is as thrilling as watching paint dry, we assure you that the pursuit of knowledge is anything but dull. Armed with our statistical tools and a healthy dose of scientific curiosity, our research team embarked on this journey with the enthusiasm of adventurers and the determination of intrepid explorers. We are ready to unearth the buried treasure of correlations, sift through the sands of data, and emerge with findings that will leave the world astounded and inspired.
As we delve into this eclectic mix of variables, we cannot help but appreciate the complexity of our natural and social systems. The interconnectedness of our world never ceases to amaze, much like a complex algebraic equation - just when you think you've solved for "x," another variable jumps into the mix, leaving you scratching your head and reaching for more advanced statistical models.
So, buckle up as we embark on a statistical rollercoaster through the realms of air quality and energy consumption. Together, we will navigate through the twists and turns of correlation, causation, and perhaps even a few statistical outliers that are as unexpected as an algebraic expression yielding an imaginary number. We invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating and data-driven adventure, where the journey promises to be as eye-opening as a microscope revealing hidden mysteries in a drop of water. Let's harness the power of data and embark on this quest to uncover the truth behind the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the web of complexities surrounding the relationship between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and kerosene usage in Syria, our research team utilized a mix of traditional statistical methods and a dash of unconventional flair. While some may argue that studying the connection between these variables is as unusual as finding a unicorn in a data set, we believe that embracing the unexpected can lead to groundbreaking discoveries.

Data Collection:
We harnessed the power of the internet to gather a plethora of information, akin to a digital treasure hunt. The primary sources of our data were the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. As any seasoned researcher knows, navigating these virtual landscapes requires a keen eye for valid sources and a knack for distinguishing credible data from statistical myths and mathematical legends.

Statistical Analysis:
With our data in hand, we embarked on a statistical journey that would make even the most ardent thrill-seeker envious. We employed a range of statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time-series analysis. It was like conducting a symphony of statistical wizardry, where each method played a crucial role in unraveling the melodic relationship between air pollution and kerosene usage.

Correlation and Causation:
As we dove into the depths of correlation, we remained vigilant against the sirens of spurious relationships and confounding variables. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 glimmering like a statistical gem, we pounced on the opportunity to examine the strength of the relationship between our variables. However, we also remained wary of mistaking correlation for causation, understanding that causation can be as elusive as a statistical chimera in the wilds of research.

Time-Series Analysis:
To capture the dynamic nature of our variables over time, we delved into the realm of time-series analysis. Much like unraveling the twists and turns of a detective novel, we scrutinized the temporal patterns of air pollution in Kingston and the ebb and flow of kerosene usage in Syria. This method allowed us to decipher the underlying narrative of how these variables danced through the annals of time, revealing insights that were as captivating as a statistical page-turner.

Outliers and Robustness Checks:
In the labyrinth of statistical analysis, we encountered a few outliers that could rival the most unexpected plot twists in a research saga. Through robustness checks and sensitivity analyses, we ensured that our findings remained resilient against the whims of statistical anomalies and outliers, providing a robust foundation for our conclusions.

In summary, our methodology blended the rigors of traditional statistical analysis with the excitement of uncovering unexpected connections. Our journey through data landscapes and statistical terrains revealed a correlation as captivating as a serendipitous discovery in the vast universe of research. With our methodology as our compass, we navigated through the statistical wilderness, ultimately shedding light on the intricate relationship between air pollution in Kingston and kerosene usage in Syria.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1991 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.8496761, r-squared of 0.7219494, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the smog of curiosity hovers over the scientific community, we embark on a journey to unravel the mysterious link between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the use of kerosene in Syria. The connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables appears to be as enigmatic as a statistical anomaly at first glance, but as researchers, it is our duty to dive into the depths of data and emerge with compelling insights, even if it means wading through a sea of perplexing correlations and surprising associations.
One might be inclined to ask, "What has the charming, picturesque town of Kingston got to do with the ancient and historically rich land of Syria?" Well, as it turns out, more than one might expect! As we plunge into the vast pool of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this unconventional relationship and examine the intricate web of factors that bring Kingston and Syria together in the realm of environmental impact.
While some may think that studying air pollution and kerosene use is as thrilling as watching paint dry, we assure you that the pursuit of knowledge is anything but dull. Armed with our statistical tools and a healthy dose of scientific curiosity, our research team embarked on this journey with the enthusiasm of adventurers and the determination of intrepid explorers. We are ready to unearth the buried treasure of correlations, sift through the sands of data, and emerge with findings that will leave the world astounded and inspired.
As we delve into this eclectic mix of variables, we cannot help but appreciate the complexity of our natural and social systems. The interconnectedness of our world never ceases to amaze, much like a complex algebraic equation - just when you think you've solved for "x," another variable jumps into the mix, leaving you scratching your head and reaching for more advanced statistical models.
So, buckle up as we embark on a statistical rollercoaster through the realms of air quality and energy consumption. Together, we will navigate through the twists and turns of correlation, causation, and perhaps even a few statistical outliers that are as unexpected as an algebraic expression yielding an imaginary number. We invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating and data-driven adventure, where the journey promises to be as eye-opening as a microscope revealing hidden mysteries in a drop of water. Let's harness the power of data and embark on this quest to uncover the truth behind the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In conducting the statistical analysis to unravel the intertwined fate of air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the consumption of kerosene in Syria, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8496761. This finding, paired with an r-squared value of 0.7219494 and a p-value less than 0.01, leaves one marveling at this unexpected dance of data.

Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly distant variables. It's as if the data points themselves are shouting, "We're all in this atmospheric soup together!"

The strength of this correlation is as striking as uncovering a diamond in the rough – a true statistical gem. It prompts us to question whether there might be an unseen connection between the fumes in Kingston and the burning of the midnight oil – or rather, the midnight kerosene – in Syria.

This finding has sent shockwaves through the academic community, akin to the surprise of discovering an unexpected statistical outlier lurking within the dataset. It serves as a quirky yet thought-provoking reminder that in the realm of statistics, there's often more than meets the eye – just like peeling back the layers of an onion and discovering that the core is not what you anticipated.

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a fascinating and robust relationship between air pollution in Kingston and the use of kerosene in Syria. The statistical evidence points to an intricate interplay between these variables, reminding us that in the world of research, correlations can sometimes be as intertwined as a pair of earbuds pulled out from the depths of a pocket. This discovery challenges our perceptions of environmental interconnectedness, prompting us to approach statistical analyses with a fresh perspective and a keen eye for unexpected relationships.

Such findings not only broaden our understanding of the global landscape of environmental impact but also add a touch of statistical intrigue to the discussion. After all, who would have thought that the air we breathe could hold such a compelling statistical story?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature offers a wealth of information and perspectives on air pollution, energy consumption, and their interconnectedness. Smith (2015) provides a thorough analysis of the socio-economic implications of air pollution in urban environments, demonstrating the wide-ranging effects on health, economy, and quality of life. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricacies of kerosene usage in developing nations, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities associated with this energy source.
However, as we venture deeper into the labyrinth of academic inquiry, we encounter unexpected companions on this scholarly odyssey. "Clean Air and Kerosene: A Comparative Study" by Johnson et al. (2019) is a beacon of insight, illuminating the parallels between air quality in industrialized nations and energy choices in regions with limited access to modern fuels. This juxtaposition offers a fresh perspective on the transcontinental dance of airborne pollutants and the use of kerosene.
Further diversifying our intellectual arsenal, we turn to non-fiction literature that explores the intersection of environmental impact and human behavior. "The Air We Breathe" by Davis (2017) provides a poignant exploration of the global ramifications of air pollution, weaving together tales of resilience and environmental stewardship. In a similar vein, "Kerosene Chronicles" by Patel (2016) paints a vivid portrait of energy dynamics in developing societies, capturing the essence of necessity-driven resource utilization.
Yet, as scholars, we also draw inspiration from unexpected sources that stimulate the imagination and thought. In the realm of fiction, "Cloudy with a Chance of Kerosene" by Sparkle (2014) offers a whimsical narrative that sparks contemplation about the whims and fancies of atmospheric interactions. Conversely, "The Polluted Princess" by Stone (2015) captures the essence of environmental degradation and the quest for cleaner air, infusing a thought-provoking blend of fantasy and reality.
As we navigate the multifaceted landscape of knowledge, it is imperative not to overlook the insights gleaned from childhood tales and animated adventures. The animated series "Kerosene Quest" and the classic children's book "The Pollution Puzzler" serve as reminders of the timeless lessons embedded in storytelling. Through these unconventional lenses, we are reminded that the quest for understanding transcends the boundaries of age and genre, intertwining valuable lessons with the charm of artistic expression.
In the spirit of scholarly curiosity, let us embrace the diversity of intellectual influences and embark on this expedition of discovery with an open mind and a hint of whimsy. The journey ahead promises to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria, demonstrating that academic pursuit can be as enthralling as unearthing buried treasure in a sea of data.

[[RESULTS]]
In conducting the statistical analysis to unravel the intertwined fate of air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the consumption of kerosene in Syria, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8496761. This finding, paired with an r-squared value of 0.7219494 and a p-value less than 0.01, leaves one marveling at this unexpected dance of data.
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly distant variables. It's as if the data points themselves are shouting, "We're all in this atmospheric soup together!"
The strength of this correlation is as striking as uncovering a diamond in the rough – a true statistical gem. It prompts us to question whether there might be an unseen connection between the fumes in Kingston and the burning of the midnight oil – or rather, the midnight kerosene – in Syria.
This finding has sent shockwaves through the academic community, akin to the surprise of discovering an unexpected statistical outlier lurking within the dataset. It serves as a quirky yet thought-provoking reminder that in the realm of statistics, there's often more than meets the eye – just like peeling back the layers of an onion and discovering that the core is not what you anticipated.
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a fascinating and robust relationship between air pollution in Kingston and the use of kerosene in Syria. The statistical evidence points to an intricate interplay between these variables, reminding us that in the world of research, correlations can sometimes be as intertwined as a pair of earbuds pulled out from the depths of a pocket. This discovery challenges our perceptions of environmental interconnectedness, prompting us to approach statistical analyses with a fresh perspective and a keen eye for unexpected relationships.
Such findings not only broaden our understanding of the global landscape of environmental impact but also add a touch of statistical intrigue to the discussion. After all, who would have thought that the air we breathe could hold such a compelling statistical story?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a surprising and robust correlation between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the utilization of kerosene in Syria. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761, r-squared value of 0.7219494, and a p-value less than 0.01 have illuminated an unexpected linkage between these seemingly distant variables. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to showcase the whimsical waltz of air quality and energy choices.

Building on the existing literature, our findings corroborate the surreptitious hints sprinkled throughout studies such as "Clean Air and Kerosene: A Comparative Study" by Johnson et al. (2019) and the whimsical narrative of "Cloudy with a Chance of Kerosene" by Sparkle (2014). Who knew that amidst the scholarly pursuit, we would stumble upon evidence that links the scent of kerosene in Syria to the gusts of pollution in Kingston?

This unexpected correlation challenges traditional boundaries and underscores the lighthearted yet thought-provoking nature of statistical inquiry. Just as intriguing as finding a stray sock in the laundry, our results prompt us to reconsider the unseen connections that permeate the realm of environmental impact and energy consumption. It is the statistics whispering to us, "There's more to this data set than meets the eye."

Fig. 1, the scatterplot, acts as a visual testament to the strong relationship between these variables, akin to two peas in a statistical pod. The statistical gem unearthed through our analysis is a testament to the unpredictability and complexity of the world of data, much like a surprise plot twist in an old novel.

In the spirit of scientific curiosity and statistical whimsy, our research invites fellow scholars to embrace the unanticipated and view data through a light-hearted lens. After all, who thought that the threads of statistical correlation could weave a tale as captivating as "The Pollution Puzzler"?

Our findings, much like a statistical magician's sleight of hand, have flipped conventional perceptions on their head, reminding us that statistical discoveries can be as captivating as a Sherlock Holmes mystery. Just as the scent of kerosene lingers in the air, so too does the aroma of unexpected statistical relationships in our research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kingston, New York and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the smog of curiosity hovers over the scientific community, we embark on a journey to unravel the mysterious link between air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the use of kerosene in Syria. The connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables appears to be as enigmatic as a statistical anomaly at first glance, but as researchers, it is our duty to dive into the depths of data and emerge with compelling insights, even if it means wading through a sea of perplexing correlations and surprising associations.
One might be inclined to ask, "What has the charming, picturesque town of Kingston got to do with the ancient and historically rich land of Syria?" Well, as it turns out, more than one might expect! As we plunge into the vast pool of statistical analysis, we aim to shed light on this unconventional relationship and examine the intricate web of factors that bring Kingston and Syria together in the realm of environmental impact.
While some may think that studying air pollution and kerosene use is as thrilling as watching paint dry, we assure you that the pursuit of knowledge is anything but dull. Armed with our statistical tools and a healthy dose of scientific curiosity, our research team embarked on this journey with the enthusiasm of adventurers and the determination of intrepid explorers. We are ready to unearth the buried treasure of correlations, sift through the sands of data, and emerge with findings that will leave the world astounded and inspired.
As we delve into this eclectic mix of variables, we cannot help but appreciate the complexity of our natural and social systems. The interconnectedness of our world never ceases to amaze, much like a complex algebraic equation - just when you think you've solved for "x," another variable jumps into the mix, leaving you scratching your head and reaching for more advanced statistical models.
So, buckle up as we embark on a statistical rollercoaster through the realms of air quality and energy consumption. Together, we will navigate through the twists and turns of correlation, causation, and perhaps even a few statistical outliers that are as unexpected as an algebraic expression yielding an imaginary number. We invite you to join us on this intellectually stimulating and data-driven adventure, where the journey promises to be as eye-opening as a microscope revealing hidden mysteries in a drop of water. Let's harness the power of data and embark on this quest to uncover the truth behind the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria.

[[RESULTS]]
In conducting the statistical analysis to unravel the intertwined fate of air pollution in Kingston, New York, and the consumption of kerosene in Syria, we unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8496761. This finding, paired with an r-squared value of 0.7219494 and a p-value less than 0.01, leaves one marveling at this unexpected dance of data.
Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly distant variables. It's as if the data points themselves are shouting, "We're all in this atmospheric soup together!"
The strength of this correlation is as striking as uncovering a diamond in the rough – a true statistical gem. It prompts us to question whether there might be an unseen connection between the fumes in Kingston and the burning of the midnight oil – or rather, the midnight kerosene – in Syria.
This finding has sent shockwaves through the academic community, akin to the surprise of discovering an unexpected statistical outlier lurking within the dataset. It serves as a quirky yet thought-provoking reminder that in the realm of statistics, there's often more than meets the eye – just like peeling back the layers of an onion and discovering that the core is not what you anticipated.
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a fascinating and robust relationship between air pollution in Kingston and the use of kerosene in Syria. The statistical evidence points to an intricate interplay between these variables, reminding us that in the world of research, correlations can sometimes be as intertwined as a pair of earbuds pulled out from the depths of a pocket. This discovery challenges our perceptions of environmental interconnectedness, prompting us to approach statistical analyses with a fresh perspective and a keen eye for unexpected relationships.
Such findings not only broaden our understanding of the global landscape of environmental impact but also add a touch of statistical intrigue to the discussion. After all, who would have thought that the air we breathe could hold such a compelling statistical story?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we close the chapter on our expedition through the statistical wilderness, we find ourselves marveling at the remarkable relationship we've uncovered between air pollution in Kingston and the use of kerosene in Syria. It's as if these variables have been engaged in a clandestine dance of correlation, whispering secrets to one another in the language of statistical significance.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 we've unearthed is the kind of finding that makes statisticians do a double take, much like stumbling upon a black swan in a sea of white ones. It's a reminder that in the world of data, there's always room for surprises, much like uncovering a hidden Easter egg in a video game.

Our results have a charm as captivating as a magician's performance, leaving us in awe of the unseen forces at play. It's like discovering a statistical symphony, with air pollution in Kingston and kerosene use in Syria harmonizing in a way that defies conventional logic.

In this light, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, when it comes to statistical quirks and unexpected correlations, we've hit the jackpot. It's time to sit back, savor the findings, and appreciate the statistical marvels that our research has unveiled. Who knew that the world of environmental impact could be so full of surprises and statistical whimsy?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Entanglements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Cross-Cultural Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Tangled Tale of Two Cities: Unraveling the Air Pollution-Kerosene Connection Between Kingston and Syria with an abstract of This study delves into the fascinating yet unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in Kingston, New York, and the usage of kerosene in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration for the period of 1991 to 2012, our research team found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8496761 and a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings shed light on a previously unnoticed relationship between seemingly disparate regions, giving new meaning to the phrase "the air we share." This research challenges conventional wisdom and ignites a fresh perspective on environmental interconnectedness, proving that when it comes to air quality, what happens in Kingston doesn't necessarily stay in Kingston.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution, kerosene usage, correlation, Kingston, New York, Syria, environmental interconnectedness, air pollution levels, EPA data, Energy Information Administration, 1991-2012, pollution correlation coefficient

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Kingston, New York
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Kingston, NY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Kingston, New York

Kerosene used in Syria
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Syria in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Syria

Correlation r = 0.8496761 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7219494 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Syria) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Kingston, New York) over the 22 years from 1991 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-7. 0.0000005631971762378525000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 5.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,775,577 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012
Air pollution in Kingston, New York (Bad air quality days)0.2521990.1453490.2396690.228650.1587740.1589040.1671230.2114290.2290320.1333330.1813190.1939060.1629830.1243090.1492960.1166670.1250.07584270.07182320.1267220.08333330.110169
Kerosene used in Syria (Million Barrels/Day)5.54.84.95.23.43.15.25.76.34.414134.087374.087373.388493.400363.748521.567180.444740.3168030.06353420.04235620.06353420.0633607




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.252199,0.145349,0.239669,0.22865,0.158774,0.158904,0.167123,0.211429,0.229032,0.133333,0.181319,0.193906,0.162983,0.124309,0.149296,0.116667,0.125,0.0758427,0.0718232,0.126722,0.0833333,0.110169,])
array_2 = np.array([5.5,4.8,4.9,5.2,3.4,3.1,5.2,5.7,6.3,4.41413,4.08737,4.08737,3.38849,3.40036,3.74852,1.56718,0.44474,0.316803,0.0635342,0.0423562,0.0635342,0.0633607,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Kingston, New York"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Syria"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 4665 · Black Variable ID: 22330 · Red Variable ID: 24965
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0