spurious correlations
random · discover · next page →
don't miss spurious scholar,
where each of these is an academic paper
View details about correlation #1,914

What else correlates?
The number of mechanical drafters in Colorado · all cccupations
Season wins for the Denver Broncos · all sports
The number of mechanical drafters in Colorado · all cccupations
Season wins for the Denver Broncos · all sports
View details about correlation #2,599

What else correlates?
Popularity of the first name Killian · all first names
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags · all weird & wacky
Popularity of the first name Killian · all first names
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags · all weird & wacky
View details about correlation #2,246

What else correlates?
Butter consumption · all food
The number of epidemiologists in Colorado · all cccupations
Butter consumption · all food
The number of epidemiologists in Colorado · all cccupations
View details about correlation #2,009

What else correlates?
Annual US household spending on eggs · all weird & wacky
Emerson Electric Co.'s stock price (EMR) · all stocks
Annual US household spending on eggs · all weird & wacky
Emerson Electric Co.'s stock price (EMR) · all stocks
View details about correlation #1,080

What else correlates?
Popularity of the first name Tyler · all first names
Gasoline pumped in Italy · all energy
Popularity of the first name Tyler · all first names
Gasoline pumped in Italy · all energy
View details about correlation #2,732

What else correlates?
The distance between Venus and Mercury · all planets
The number of nursing assistants in Indiana · all cccupations
The distance between Venus and Mercury · all planets
The number of nursing assistants in Indiana · all cccupations
View details about correlation #2,965

View details about correlation #2,498

What else correlates?
Popularity of the first name Blanca · all first names
Robberies in Texas · all random state specific
Popularity of the first name Blanca · all first names
Robberies in Texas · all random state specific
View details about correlation #5,865

What else correlates?
The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in · all films & actors
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme · all memes
The number of movies Amy Poehler appeared in · all films & actors
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme · all memes
View details about correlation #5,825

What else correlates?
Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' · all google searches
Fossil fuel use in British Virgin Islands · all energy
Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' · all google searches
Fossil fuel use in British Virgin Islands · all energy
View details about correlation #1,828

What else correlates?
Number of public school students in 9th grade · all education
Bank of America's stock price (BAC) · all stocks
Number of public school students in 9th grade · all education
Bank of America's stock price (BAC) · all stocks
View details about correlation #4,986

What else correlates?
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' · all memes
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' · all google searches
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' · all memes
Google searches for 'who is elon musk' · all google searches
View details about correlation #3,705

What else correlates?
The number of physicists in California · all cccupations
Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking · all weird & wacky
The number of physicists in California · all cccupations
Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking · all weird & wacky
View details about correlation #2,730

What else correlates?
The distance between Uranus and the moon · all planets
Electricity generation in Japan · all energy
The distance between Uranus and the moon · all planets
Electricity generation in Japan · all energy
View details about correlation #2,709

What else correlates?
Associates degrees awarded in History · all education
Centene's stock price (CNC) · all stocks
Associates degrees awarded in History · all education
Centene's stock price (CNC) · all stocks
View details about correlation #5,920

What else correlates?
Per capita consumption of margarine · all food
The divorce rate in Maine · all random state specific
Per capita consumption of margarine · all food
The divorce rate in Maine · all random state specific
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.”
Fun fact: the chart used on the wikipedia page to demonstrate data dredging is also from me. I've been being naughty with data since 2014.
Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead tossed a bunch of data in a blender to see what correlations would shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random. - Lack of causal connection: There is probably no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above.
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. You will often see trend-lines form. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A naive p-value calculation does not take this into account.
You will calculate a lower chance of "randomly" achieving the result than represents reality.
To be more specific: p-value tests are probability values, where you are calculating the probability of achieving a result at least as extreme as you found completely by chance. When calculating a p-value, you need to assert how many "degrees of freedom" your variable has. I count each year (minus one) as a "degree of freedom," but this is misleading for continuous variables.
This kind of thing can creep up on you pretty easily when using p-values, which is why it's best to take it as "one of many" inputs that help you assess the results of your analysis.
- Y-axes doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graphs above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. If you click on any of the charts that abuse this, you can scroll down to see a version that starts at zero. - Confounding variable: Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
- Outliers: Some datasets here have outliers which drag up the correlation.
In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.
Because this page is automatically generated, I don't know whether any of the charts displayed on it have outliers. I'm just a footnote. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong. - Low n: There are not many data points included in some of these charts.
You can do analyses with low ns! But you shouldn't data dredge with a low n.
Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Pro-tip: click on any correlation to see:
- Detailed data sources
- Prompts for the AI-generated content
- Explanations of each of the calculations (correlation, p-value)
- Python code to calculate it yourself